Prospects in the Ernesto Frieri Trade: Alexi Amarista and Donn Roach
Prospects in the Ernesto Frieri Trade: Alexi Amarista and Donn Roach
The San Diego Padres traded pitcher Ernesto Frieri to the Los Angeles Angels in exchange for infielder Alexi Amarista and right-handed pitcher Donn Roach. Let's take a look at this pair of prospects. Amarista is better-known since he's reached the majors already, but Roach is the prospect to watch in this trade.
Alexi Amarista, INF: Amarista is a 5-8, 150-pound left-handed hitter and right-handed thrower, born April 6th, 1989. The Angels signed him out of Venezuela as a free agent in 2007. He was a consistent .300 hitter at the lower levels, lacking power but showing a knack for contact. He hit .292/.337/.419 in 86 games for Triple-A Salt Lake last season and was hitting .273/.289/.403 in 18 games so far this year. Amarista saw action in 23 games for the major league team last season, hitting .154/.182/.250 in 52 at-bats.
The Angels were grooming Amarista as a utilityman and that looks like his best role in the majors. He is an excellent defensive second baseman, is solid at shortstop, and can perform competently at third base and all three outfield positions, although his below-average arm strength can be a problem. With the bat, he's a contact hitter but lacks power and doesn't draw many walks. Amarista is an aggressive runner with slightly above-average speed, although he gets caught stealing more often than ideal.
Donn Roach, RHP: The Angels drafted Roach in the supplemental third round in 2010, from the Junior College of Southern Nevada. He was the ace of the pitching staff and received plenty of exposure as Bryce Harper's teammate. The Angels used him in relief last year for Low-A Cedar Rapids in the Midwest League, where he posted a 3.45 ERA with a 68/20 K/BB in 70 innings. He was moved back to the starting rotation this spring and is off to an excellent start for Inland Empire in the California League: 5-0, 2.16 ERA in six starts, with a 29/3 K/BB in 42 innings, with 36 hits allowed.
Roach is a 6-1, 200 pound right-handed hitter and thrower, born December 14, 1989. He is one of the most extreme ground ball pitchers in the minor leagues, posting an amazing 6.23 GO/AO so far this year and 3.55 last season. The Angels have revised Roach's mechanics considerably since college; you can find a comparison of his mechanics now and then here.
Roach has a low-90s fastball; as you can imagine from the numbers, this pitch has strong sinking action. He mixes in an improving slider, an occasional curve, and an impressive split-finger pitch that he uses in changeup counts. The revised delivery has dramatically improved his command within the strike zone, and (in theory) should help him stay healthy. Although some scouts still see him as a reliever, Roach's arsenal is diverse enough for him to start as long as he maintains his command. He should reach Double-A later this year and could see the majors sometime in 2013 if all goes well.
13 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Your Thoughts
John I was wondering what your personal opinion was on this trade. Do you think the Angels overpaid for Frieri or do you think they got fair value? You had Roach and Amarista in your “Others” section when the top 20 lists came out and I assume if you had to regrade Roach he would probably be a C+/B- do to the small sample size of dominance this season and Amarista’s grade would probably still hold put, but it seems to me the Padres sold high on a pitcher who might not have been in their long term plans and the Angels out of desperation slightly over paid. Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
"On [umpire] Jeff Kellogg taking a foul tip to the groin: ‘Two balls, one strike.’"
by James Westfall on May 4, 2025 7:53 PM EDT reply actions
well...
Frieri is a pretty solid guy. Amarista is just a UT in my view. I really like Roach but, you know, he’s in A-ball….he could easily blow his arm out next week. I think it makes some sense for both teams.
by John Sickels on May 4, 2025 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions
im going to miss Roach
but I really cant blame DiPoto for going out and helping one of the teams biggest needs. Plus Frieri is under club control through 2017 I believe
Nick Adenhart will always be my favorite baseball player
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on May 4, 2025 8:24 PM EDT reply actions
Through 2017? Where in the hell did you hear that?
Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty good.
by Bface on May 5, 2025 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
It looks like through 2016, even that surprises me.
Pretty, pretty, pretty, pretty good.
by Bface on May 5, 2025 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
losing faith in Pujols already huh?
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
by feslenraster on May 5, 2025 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm sure his power is going to come around
What I’m worried about with Pujols is what I’ve been worried about with him for the last several years. His sharp BB/K change over the last few years sure looks like that of a player who is getting more aggressive for the purpose of staving off the effects of physical decline.
In 2009, his BB/K was 115/64. This year, he has more than twice as many strikeouts as walks. Above all else, I have confidence that a struggling player will revert back to his previous level of performance when he’s maintaining the approach that has brought him success. For whatever reason, and you can make sense of his other numbers however you wish, he does not appear to be anything like the player that he was once in terms of approach.
by mrkupe on May 5, 2025 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
this
don’t understand why DiPoto signed him to that contract and why it seemed to be lauded as a great move for the Angels by most people, whereas Fielder’s contract was ridiculed to a great extent
don’t think either contract is great, but it seemed obvious to me at the time that if i had to bet on who would generate more value overall over the next 9-10 years, i’d bet on Fielder and not Pujols
by blue bulldog on May 5, 2025 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Pujols means more to a team than just his on field production
I’m sure he also faced pressure from ownership to get something done. Arte’s filthy rich and really wants to win.
Or, maybe, he wants to have massive short term success to put on his resume, leave anaheim, and then repeat with a new franchise. I dunno. But really, it’s Albert Pujols. Just how could you pass up an opportunity at the greatest free agent you’ll see in a long time when your owner also clearly wanted it?
by CaptainCanuck on May 5, 2025 2:20 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
They said the same thing about Dice K and Fonzie Soriano
Of course all those other things seem to go out the window as soon as the production craters.
I thought Fielder would be the better value. And I had really hoped the Cubs would pony up once the market seemed to dry up.
However, Detroit really came out of nowhere to set that market. I didn’t see any team going more than 5 years.
" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "
by aaronb on May 6, 2025 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Neither is Pujols
And by that I mean bringing in the greatest hitter of our generation and one of the best sluggers in history can do a lot for a fan base.
Dice-K had that effect being the most hyped Japanese player then, and I’m sure the Red Sox brought in more money through off the field matters, more than they paid Dice-K to tank on the mound. Soriano isn’t even close.
by CaptainCanuck on May 6, 2025 10:28 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I kinda think that from a "bird in the hand" standpoint, the Angels got the better of the Padres in this trade.
However, San Diego manages to spin bullpen arms out left and right.
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
A lot is two words. Allot can be one word but it has another meaning.
The only time you really want to use "myself" is when you are the recipient of your own action. Usually you're better off using "me."
Your is not the correct contraction of you are. The word you're looking for is you're.
It's anyway, not anyways.
But if you only remember one thing...
There are no apostrophes in plurals.
by Since1993 on May 6, 2025 2:34 AM EDT reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by John Sickels on 













