Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: MLB Hot Stove: blogging the rumors, trades, signings Bar-right-arrows



Dewey's Hot 99 Prospects

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen,

 

I would like to present my Top 99 Prospects List.

 

Enjoy!

 

1. Matt Wieters - Strong bet to assault AL pitchers

2. David Price - Will overtake Scott Kazmir as 'Ace' of the Rays

3. Travis Snider - Middle of the order run producer with good avg

4. Trevor Cahill - Smart kid has better stuff than Webb IMO.

5. Dexter Fowler -Breakout year showed .300, 20+ HR, 30+ SB potential

6. Justin Smoak - Switch-hitting power 1B with great defense

7. Derek Holland - Fits the Scott Kazmir/Jon Lester mold

8. Pedro Alvarez - Should've been drafted #1 overall in June

9. Michael Stanton - Big athletic kid with legitimate 40+ HR potential

10. Jesus Montero - Wont stick at catcher, but .300+ avg and 30+ HR is nice

11. Jason Heyward - I see a young Barry Bonds if development continues

12. Lars Anderson - Potential .300+ avg & 30+ HR 1B bat

13. Cameron Maybin - 5 tool stud just needs to cut down on Ks

14. Tim Alderson - I think he has realistic John Lackey upside

15. Freddie Freeman - Big 1B can hit for avg, power, and draw walks

16. Jarrod Parker - Excellent stuff, just needs consistency

17. Angel Villalona - Young and raw, but the potential is huge

18. Gordon Beckham - 25-30 HR Shortstop

19. Yonder Alonso - Excellent approach at the plate, high avg/good power

20. Jhoulys Chacin - Gets K's & GBs, perfect to be Rockies' Ace

21. Neftali Feliz - Overpowering fastball with improving off-speed stuff

22. Mike Moustakas - 30+ HR power with solid avg, move to OF likely

23. Matt LaPorta - I see Pat Burrell, which is a pretty darn good hitter

24. Madison Bumgarner - Made low A look way too easy

25. Michael Saunders - Very similar to Grady Sizemore

26. Tommy Hanson - He's making it hard not to like him, lots of Ks

27. Chris Tillman - Good fastball with hammer curve = plenty of strikeouts

28. Andrew McCutchen - Has the tools, needs better results

29. Daryl Jones - Cards fans should be more excited about him than Rasmus

30. Logan Morrison - Might be better than the 2006 version of Lyle Overbay

31. Ben Revere - Might become one of the best leadoff men in the AL

32. Brett Cecil - Good FB/SL combo will make him a solid #2 starter

33. Junichi Tazawa - Newly signed import has potentially 2-3 plus pitches

34. Carlos Santana - Catcher with an Incredible offensive season

35. Chris Perez - Ready to close now, potential Brad Lidge

36. Andrew Lambo - Good power, good avg, I liken him to JD Drew

37. Rick Porcello - Nice debut, Tigers should take the kid gloves off

38. Brett Wallace - Kid can flat out hit, can he play 3B though?

39. Brian Matusz - Excellent command of 4 above avg pitches

40. Brett Anderson - Knows how to get outs without plus stuff

41. Elvis Andrus - Should be an excellent leadoff hitter for the Rangers

42. Austin Jackson - Yankees long term CF, 15/15 with .280-.290+ avg

43. Colby Rasmus - 20/20 potential, but avg needs to be higher

44. Buster Posey - Solid hitting skills with good defense behind the plate

45. Phillpp Aumont - Has the stuff for a lot of ground outs and punchouts

46. Dellin Betances - Nasty FB/CB combo, needs to reduce the BBs

47. Matt Dominguez - Good pop/defense, reminds me of Ryan Zimmerman

48. Mat Gamel - Too bad there is no DH in the NL

49. Gregory Halman - I see a Mike Cameron type hitter

50. Michael Bowden - Has four quality pitches that he controls very well

51. Eric Hosmer - HS kid with big power potential, cant wait for debut

52. Michael Inoa - All hype at this point, but a teen that throws high 90s

53. Shooter Hunt - Improved command/control would make him Matt Cain

54. Beau Mills - Pronk's replacement as run producer for Indians

55. Wade Davis - Big guy should be a workhorse for the Rays

56. Jordan Walden - Would be higher on list if he'd maintain high 90s heat

57. Jordan Zimmerman - Not a true frontline starter, but will be for Nationals

58. Carlos Carrasco - Excellent changeup makes him very effective

59. Will Inman - Flyball tendencies wont hurt as much in Petco

60. Josh Vitters - Will hit for high avg, more power will make him an allstar

61. Dayan Viciedo - Intriguing kid could be a force with the bat

62. Jake Arrieta - Good stuff, needs to improve command for #3 upside

63. Zach McCallister - Stuff is getting better, keeps the ball on the ground

64. David Cooper - Good avg, good power, can take a walk

65. Adam Miller - Injuries slowed what looked like a bright future once

66. Tim Beckham - Similar to Edgar Renteria, good but not great player

67. Jonathon Niese - Lefty with good curve gets a lot of groundball outs

68. Tyler Flowers - Not sure about his future as C, but good power and OBP

69. Carlos Truinfel - Young kid holding his own, despite being rushed

70. Jeremy Hellickson - Excellent control, but gives up too many HRs

71. Jordan Schafer - Was really high on him before the scandal

72. Fernando Martinez - Needs to stay healthy and produce to warrant hype

73. Taylor Teagarden - Good power and defense, needs to improve avg

74. Wes Hodges - A potential .280+ avg and 20 HR bat

75. Jeff Samardzija - Love his FB, is he better suited for the bullpen?

76. Todd Frazier - Solid performance despite tough hitters league (FSL)

77. Jose Tabata - He'll hit for a great avg, but is there power potential?

78. Desmond Jennings - Was injured, but still has 5 tools potential

79. Neftali Soto - Its early, but showing signs of ability for avg & power

80. Kyle Blanks - Big dude proving he can hit consistently

81. Wilmer Flores - Very impressive debut

82. Aaron Hicks - Small sample size, but displayed 5 tool potential

83. JP Arencibia - I like the power, but not the lack of walks

84. Daniel Cortes - Good fastball and curve, but the flyball rates scare me

85. Chris Marrero - Lost season due to injury, dont forget about him and his pop

86. Danny Duffy - Strikeout machine, but alot of flyballs

87. Kila Ka'aihue - Hits HRs and takes BBs

88. Scott Elbert - Healthy, has #2-3 potential if Dodgers return him to starting

89. Michael Main - I should probably give this kid more respect.

90. Julio Teheran - Loosely compared to King Felix, too early IMO

91. Hank Conger - Switch-hitting catcher showed nice power

92. Daniel Bard - Hard thrower has the potential to be a lights out reliever

93. Cedric Hunter - David DeJesus clone?  Not a bad ball player

94. Jairo Heredia - Under the radar kid should be watched in '09

95. Dae-Eun Rhee - Nasty splitter makes him hard to hit

96. Martin Perez - Solid #s for such a young kid (17 years old)

97. James McDonald - Impressed as a reliever, long-term role?

98. Michael Burgess - Young kid has serious power, needs to cut down Ks

99. Chris Carter (Oak) -Massive power, but low avg and high Ks

100. ???

Who should be the #100 prospect on my list?

3 recs | Comment 149 comments | Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

#100 should be...

Etahn Martin!

by joegonzo on Dec 22, 2025 3:21 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

#100 should be

Jeremy Jeffress

by thudean on Dec 22, 2025 7:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Oops!

Major oversight by me.

I would’ve had him in the high 70s or low 80s.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:05 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Does that mean?

That I win?! Is it a cash prize? :-)

by thudean on Dec 23, 2025 10:04 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

#100: Julio Borbon.

" He throws it where he wants it, his breaking ball kept getting better and better and of course God gave him that special arm. He's great." ~ Neftali Feliz on Derek Holland.

by Kinslerhomer on Dec 22, 2025 3:26 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

It's your list, but

how Holland or Stanton are top 10 guys, but Maybin, Feliz are not is beyond me. Freeman at 15 and MadBum at 24!?

KLaw called Stanton a 4A type. I’ll give Holland props for his great year, but I think most scouts/BA/BP guys see Feliz as the more promising starter.

I also think Porcello at 37 is one you might regret by next year.

While i have a lot of issues with this list, i’s good to see/hear others opinions.

by MightyMoose on Dec 22, 2025 3:26 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

slurve's Dewey impersonation

Those two are are future HOF’ers based on my exclusive scouting reports than no one else has ever (or will ever) see. Maybin and Feliz just don’t do it for me and BA has been wrong before - so I must be right.

by slurve on Dec 22, 2025 4:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

LOL

I’m Dewey Finn, NOT Paul Thomas!

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Bite me.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 23, 2025 12:36 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

you wouldn't be confused with PT

Paul Thomas actually backs his arguments up with stats or logic… something you seem allergic to.

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 23, 2025 2:23 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

It's all good Dewey

just had to give you some shit…

by slurve on Dec 23, 2025 2:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

No worries dude

All in good fun.

Paul Thomas’ hissy fits are hilarious. I could just picture him smashing his keyboard, LOL.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 3:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Ok

Feliz only has a slightly better fastball than Holland, Holland gets the edge in secondary offerings.

I think Freeman has more skills as a hitter than Bumgarner does as a pitcher (fastball and…).

Keith Law called Stanton a 4A type? Doesn’t surprise me, Law says alot of dumb things.

As for Porcello, I fully expect him to rank higher next year, but for now, he doesn’t deserve it.

Anyways, I dont expect you to agree with what I have to say. Just voicing my opinions.

Merry Christmas.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:25 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

merry Christmas Dewey

In response,

like it or not Law does have more inside info than you or I. I’m not saying he will be a 4A player, but he played in a hitter’s park/league and the k’s are a concern. for every Ryan Howard there are 10 other guys that strikeout too much and don’t materialize. however, if he turns into a Jack Cust type with high k’s but makes up for it in power than i’m sure the Marlins would be pretty happy. he’ll be challenged next year in the FSL. i just think its very pre-mature to have him that high. I think mid-20’s for now is about right.

I have a bit of a man-crush on Porcello. kid was lights out and I think the K’s will come.

also props for you with Revere. I really think he is going to be a speed freak. good to see he is getting some respect.

by MightyMoose on Dec 23, 2025 2:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Stanton

His Ks do worry me too. However, I think he has the ability to hit for a respectable avg, unlike guys like Chris Carter. Furhermore, he’s very athletic and plays good defense.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 3:40 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

thats just silly

carter hit 291 in 07 and had a flukey low BABIP of .296 last year. If you regress that to the .330 that he had in 07 his batting average would be right around 290 again. Carter will hit for plenty average.

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 24, 2025 3:32 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

???

.300 is average unless i’m seriously mistaken.

Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.

by doublestix on Dec 24, 2025 3:56 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

+1 on Revere

Sickels, Goldstein and Callis have all been quoted as saying that Revere isn’t some slap hitter. He hits hard line drives all over the field and has unbelievable bat control. Personally I could see him becoming a hitter similar to Kenny Lofton.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Dec 23, 2025 3:58 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

keith law

is a tool. . . i thought that for a long time. . . then i met him . . . now i think he’s even a bigger tool

by SoCalSoxFan on Dec 23, 2025 2:47 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

He definitely sees the world differently

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:10 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Thoughts

Guys to move up:
1. Porcello - I see #1 starter potential in this kid
2. Eric Hosmer - His power potential is enormous
3. Tim Beckham - Should he be top 10? No. Top 30? Yes
4. Desmond Jennings - If healthy he will crack top 20 next year. Potential replacement for Crawford.

Guys to move down:
1. Derek Holland - Great pitching prospect but a tad over ranked.
2. Zach McCallister - I see middle reliever in his future
3. Tyler Flowers - If he moves off catcher his bat starts to look average at 1B.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Dec 22, 2025 3:35 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Overall

Great job on the list so far Dewey. While not everyone will agree with you, it should generate some good discussion.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Dec 22, 2025 3:36 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

If by “good discussion” you meant a massive flame war.

Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all.

by baetown415 on Dec 23, 2025 2:54 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

This is certainly your list

And I mean that in the best of ways

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 22, 2025 3:36 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Out of curiosity

Why so high on Lambo?

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Dec 22, 2025 4:12 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

because he's apparently JD Drew's clone

Even though he’s not that good.

by boonitez on Dec 22, 2025 10:27 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

IMO

I see a lot of similarities between Lambo and Drew.

Will Lambo be as good as Drew? I think he’ll be close, making him a fine talent.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:07 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

the guy barely posted an .800 OPS in A ball

how is he anything like JD Drew?

by boonitez on Dec 23, 2025 12:21 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Dont cherry pick numbers

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 12:29 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

K fine

If using OPS is cherry picking, lets look deeper than that. His line this year was .288/.346/.462 with 110 K’s and 41 BB’s. His K% was 23.3. That’s a lot. He’s displayed some HR power, but that’s pretty much it. Nothing else he’s done so far sticks out, besides his strikeouts, which is a bad thing. Now what about his numbers screams JD Drew?

by boonitez on Dec 23, 2025 12:53 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I don't think you know what cherry picking is

That was his line in his full season debut.

by aCone419 on Dec 23, 2025 9:30 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I noted this in your "B" grade thread too

Lambo doesn’t profile anywhere near Drew as a defensive player. Drew has been an above average-to-great LF/RF/CF his entire career. Lambo is viewed as a liability in LF (average arm, poor range now which will decrease as he ages). I think Lambo would have to outhit Drew by a vast margin in order to be considered close to Drew’s value as an overall player.

by jibs on Dec 23, 2025 11:23 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Comparable offensively

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:13 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I do

When it presents itself.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 11:49 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

okay...

Since you can’t use stats, give me one scouting report that compares his abilities to that of Drew and you will have made a believer out of me.

by boonitez on Dec 24, 2025 12:40 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Niese over Martinez?

Interesting take, but even if you don’t care much for him, I don’t see how F-Mart is 30 places below guys like Elvis Andrus and Austin Jackson. F-Mart has a very similar career batting line as Jackson (F-Mart: .280 / .337 / .427, A-Jax: .284 / .355 / .410), they had very similar seasons in AA (F-Mart: .287 / .340 / .432, A-Jax: .285 / .354 / .419), they play the same position (If the Mets had Johnny Damon instead of Carlos Beltran, you’d almost certainly see F-Mart projected as the future CF), and Martinez is nearly two years younger. Yes, I see that F-Mart’s plate discipline is lagging a bit behind, but with his BB/K still around 2.7-2.8, he’s not quite in the range of major red flag, especially considering age and level (although its certainly worth keeping an eye on). But he’s also flashed plenty of power for a guy who hasn’t seen a stateside AB since before he turned 20 in October. He’s hit his 22 HR in 929 pro ABs, while Jackson has hit his 26 in 1696 ABs, and Jackson did it at much more age appropriate levels.

I can definitely see Andrus being higher than Martinez, and maybe even Jackson, but it should be a lot closer. I like what Andrus has shown so far, and he’s in a similar situation to Martinez at a more important position. But with Jackson, it just seems like they make about the same amount of contact (Similar averages, and check out the K% for 2008, F-Mart: 19, A-Jax: 19.4), and while Jackson gives you a handful of extra walks (BB% F-Mart: 7, A-Jax: 9.5), Martinez is already making harder contact (LD% F-Mart: 19, A-Jax: 13). Maybe you give a slight defensive plus to Jackson, but he’s not Carlos Beltran either, and were he in the Mets system might look like a future 4th outfielder. The tipping point might be health, but that’s the only way I can see making a case that Jackson belongs higher than F-Mart, and I don’t think it justifies 30 spots on a Top 100.

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 4:22 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

+1

I can’t think of any reason for Niese to be over Fernando. Or Flores for that matter.

by supermets on Dec 22, 2025 5:40 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yeah

It seems like Fernando gets penalized more than he should for not quite living up to the enormous hype. The A-Jax comp is telling. They’ve accomplished almost exactly the same thing, except Martinez is 1.75 years younger and has consistently played against competition that was older and more advanced. Yet Jackson’s the future answer to the Yankees CF prayers, while Martinez still “has to produce”. Personally, I’ll take the younger guy who got all the hype from the scouts to begin with any day.

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 10:43 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Also

I also think he gets burned because he’s behind one of the best all around CFs in the game on the depth chart. Its assumed he’s going to wind up in a corner, but he hasn’t yet, and no ones really calling him a poor defender, just not a superb one like Beltran.

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 10:50 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Niese vs Fmart

IMO, Niese has the potential upside to be a #3 starter. Solid fastball, excellent curve, groundballs.

Personally, I’ve always felt Fmart was overrated. He’s young, bla bla bla. Put up or shut up.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:10 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

But A-Jax isn't young

And he’s done the exact same thing

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 11:12 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Personally

I believe more in Ajax’s potential than Fmart’s. Fmart is just too inconsistent to be relied upon.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Um...

How so? Did you look at the stats side by side? They’re nearly identical. F-Mart has a touch more power, A-Jax has drawn a few more walks. BA and K% are nearly identical. They put up almost identical lines at the same level in 2008, except F-Mart was two years younger, and has been among the youngest players at his level his entire pro career.

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 11:44 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Age

Has been a crutch for Fmart for too long.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:49 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Austin Jackson has been hyped since he was 13

so it isn’t like fmart has had more time to prove he is a bust, jackson was a big time amatuer and has never lived up to his hype, it isn’t like he just hasn’t had a chance to prove it yet

by IHateMitchMustain on Dec 23, 2025 12:23 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Player comparison:

Take a look if my first post was too long for you to read:

F-Mart has a very similar career batting line as Jackson (F-Mart: .280 / .337 / .427, A-Jax: .284 / .355 / .410), they had very similar seasons in AA (F-Mart: .287 / .340 / .432, A-Jax: .285 / .354 / .419), they play the same position (If the Mets had Johnny Damon instead of Carlos Beltran, you’d almost certainly see F-Mart projected as the future CF), and Martinez is nearly two years younger.
they make about the same amount of contact (Similar averages, and check out the K% for 2008, F-Mart: 19, A-Jax: 19.4), and while Jackson gives you a handful of extra walks (BB% F-Mart: 7, A-Jax: 9.5), Martinez is already making harder contact (LD% F-Mart: 19, A-Jax: 13). Maybe you give a slight defensive plus to Jackson, but he’s not Carlos Beltran either, and were he in the Mets system might look like a future 4th outfielder.

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 11:47 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Ajax

IMO is a future gold glove CF with good avg/pop/speed.

His all round game is more developed than Fmart.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:51 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

What parts of those are more development

Than F-Mart? He also runs well, he already has more power, his contact numbers are identical (.287 BA 19 K% for F-Mart .285 BA 19.4 K% for A-Jax). Even if you throw age out the window, they’re still really close, and you certainly don’t take points away from F-Mart for being young for his level.

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 11:55 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Future gold glove for A-Jax

I haven’t heard that anywhere. I’ve heard he’s a solid CF glove, probably better than F-Mart, and certainly better than Johnny Damon, but really? How do you project that? Do you have a quote from an expert suggesting it?

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 11:57 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

And again

I’m not saying F-Mart is necessarily better than Jackson, but he at least belongs in the same discussion, not 30 places lower.

by Meddler on Dec 23, 2025 12:04 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

30 places lower

Because that gap is filled with guys that I feel are better talents than Fmart.

IMO, they belong in the same discussion more so than Fmart.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 12:12 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Are you

going offer any evidence to support your position? It seems like the numbers I provided are pretty compelling. I get that its your opinion, that much is clear, but you haven’t offered anything tangible to support it other than “IMO”.

by Meddler on Dec 23, 2025 12:20 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Numbers aren't everything.

Afterall, Hanley didn’t exactly light the world on fire in the minors.

Look at him now. By the way, its his birthday today.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:14 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

While that's true

Doesn’t that mean that the guy who gets the scouting hype should get the edge? Hanley didn’t tear it up, but he got the same kind of mega-hype at a very young age that F-Mart did. He had some minor league struggles, but busted out in A+ and AA as a 20 year old. That comp seems to enhance the case for F-Mart if anything.

Is it Hanleys Bday? So it is. Happy B-day Hanley (see, Mets fans pay attention to you too ;))!

by Meddler on Dec 23, 2025 5:03 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

And in repy to
Thanks man!
Good to know I haven’t offended at least one person, lol.

Its a fine list, I’m not offended that you don’t like the guy I like as much. I apologize if I came off as gruff, but I do appreciate your opinion and your willingness to share it. I just get a little hyper-analytical sometimes, and I get locked into that mode of thinking. I’m really just curious as to what your basing your opinion on.

by Meddler on Dec 23, 2025 5:06 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Isn’t as young I should say

by Meddler on Dec 22, 2025 11:12 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Good list Dewey!

by Orioles77 on Dec 22, 2025 5:00 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Thanks man!

Good to know I haven’t offended at least one person, lol.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:31 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

in my personal opinion

Villalona over Neftali Feliz is a JOKE

by stogies on Dec 22, 2025 5:19 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Well

I think Villalona has the potential to be an offensive force.

I like Feliz, and did not try to insult him with my ranking.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:13 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

He does

but he hasn’t done too much to back that up at this point. Until he has a 20+ homer season where he doesn’t strike out 1,000,000,000 times, it’s not really fair to rank him over someone who has already put up great numbers. Feliz is one of the best pitching prospects in baseball; Villalona isn’t one of the best hitting prospects at this point. I believe he will be, but it’s not fair to say that until he has a break out year.

by boonitez on Dec 23, 2025 12:20 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I guess

It depends on ultimately what you think Feliz will become. If you think he has #1 written all over him, then having him ranked ahead of Villalona would make sense from your perspective.

IMO, Feliz should be a good/great #2. Villalona will be a .300 hitter with 40+ homers (eventually).

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:33 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Rasmus

Has two terrible months in Triple A, and the rats are already bailing.

by CoolCat23 on Dec 22, 2025 5:27 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Sorry

Unlike you, I can’t ignore his suckiness. I’m trying to be objective.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:14 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Most people still rank him high

I applaud you for going so low with him though I think he is a little higher than 43. I would think more around 25-30. The kid is still really young though and I think he will put that terrible slump behind him and do great next year, even though his average was pretty terrible.

by wizardofozzie on Dec 23, 2025 3:23 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

half the players on this list are way off

Just to name a few:

Dae Eun Rhee-would not make my top 300. #95???
Derek Holland-There is just no way that he’s better than Heyward
Michael Inoa-simply too high
Tim Alderson-MadBum should be higher

These lists take time, I know that, but this list seems to have more flaws than others.

PS: why on earth does this site overrate Holland so much?

by Matt Rox on Dec 22, 2025 5:44 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Holland

Because he throws hard and is left handed. People tend to overrate those types of pitchers. Hyperbole tends to run rampant on prospect sites anyway.

by CoolCat23 on Dec 22, 2025 5:56 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Yeah

It seems to me that prospect ranking is starting to become more an more of a religion rather than a science. Too many absolute certainties and not enough speculation and research.

by CoolCat23 on Dec 22, 2025 6:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Derek Holland...

Throws hard (mid-high 90s)
Left-handed pitcher
Good secondary stuff (getting even better)
Excellent performance (dominant)
Racks up strikeouts

Ya, not sure why people would like him so much.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:41 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Inoa

I bet Inoa is higher than 50 in BA’s top 100 list.

by DeJay on Dec 22, 2025 6:35 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

+1

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:38 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Hi

Rhee would not make your top 300 because you don’t know enough about him. Kid has good stuff.
Holland is more proven than Heyward at this point. LOVE both though.
Inoa has gotten a lot of hype, but it’s hard to ignore all the scouting reports gushing over him.
Alderson > Bumgarner due to more pitches and better command.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Rhee wouldn't make anyone else's top 300

because he’s only pitched 40 innings in A ball.
Heyward is pretty much the best hitting prospect in the game that’s not named Weiters. That seems to be pretty much a concensus around here. How is Holland that much more proven if he’s only pitched 20 innings in the level above Heyward (AA)?
I personally think Inoa shouldn’t be rated at all until he pitches a game in the minors, but I do see why he’s being hyped so much.
 Alderson is not better than Bumgarner. He doesn’t have more pitches; his secondary stuff is just more developed. That doesn’t make him better; it just means he’s further along in the developmental track. And show me a single stat that shows Alderson has better command. If you’d ever actually looked at their season stats you’d know that’s not true.

by boonitez on Dec 23, 2025 12:12 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Rhee

I believe Rhee had TJ surgery this year. Did that factor into your ranking?

The Dodgers won't win a playoff series until the Cool-a-Coo returns.

by mckeeno on Dec 23, 2025 8:54 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Right

Rhee has 40 innings in low A ball, a fairly high walk rate in that small sample size, and we have no idea how he’s going to return from TJ surgery yet. Top 100 seems too aggressive to me too.

Just as rankings comparison, John has him at #9 in an extremely weak/thin Cubs system, which would probably put Rhee outside of John’s top 300 as well.

by jibs on Dec 23, 2025 11:32 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Oh

I didn’t have info about TJ surgery. With that in mind, he would be removed from top 100.

Will look into this.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:26 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Porcello

I never like to criticize people’s list because it is there oppinion, I would justl ike to know why you rank Porcello below people like Cecil and Perez? If the Tigers offered Porcello for Cecil I think the Blue Jays would do it instantly.

by FishHead on Dec 22, 2025 6:25 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

cecil for porcello?

Not a hope in hell from the jays perspective…mostly for “other” reasons though. I personally think Cecil is a bit underappreciated due to the patient approach the Jays have had with him.

by ayjackson on Dec 22, 2025 9:34 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Well

As of right now, I think Cecil and Perez have better stuff and are further along in their development.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:19 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Inoa

I would like to know when he was ever clocked throwing in the mid 90’s.

by CoolCat23 on Dec 22, 2025 6:59 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

From Scout.com (subscription required)
Built like an NBA small forward, Inoa stands at 6’7’’. He comes from a family of athletes and, according to Patterson, he already repeats his delivery with ease. Inoa reportedly can touch 94 miles per hour with his fastball. He also has a 78 mile per hour curveball, an 81 mile per hour slider and a 79 mile per hour change-up, according to the A’s internal reports."

http://athletics.scout.com/2/819773.html

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 22, 2025 8:32 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

From BA (subscription required)
Several scouts have called Inoa one of the best 16-year-old pitchers they’ve ever seen. He already has a lively low-90s fastball that has touched 94 mph, and with his size and mechanics he projects to throw even harder. He has remarkable athleticism and coordination for his size, allowing him to repeat an effortless delivery and have good command. He has the potential for a plus curveball and also throws a changeup that already grades as fringe average.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2009/267275.html

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 22, 2025 8:35 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

"That has touched 94 mph"

Touching 94 =/= Throwing mid 90s

by Southwest on Dec 23, 2025 2:17 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I was responding to "I would like to know when he was ever clocked throwing in the mid 90’s."

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 23, 2025 2:36 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

+1

“Throwing mid 90s” implies a repeated action, not an isolated event. Lots of prospects have hit 94 or higher, and then never displayed that velocity again.

by aCone419 on Dec 23, 2025 9:35 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

You're answering a question different from the one asked.

What point are you trying to make? If your point is that pitching prospects are risky, then I think everyone already knows that.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 23, 2025 9:49 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Point

That having hit 94 is not the same as throwing mid-90s, which was the spirit if not exact wording of the question.

by aCone419 on Dec 23, 2025 2:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

You got served

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Well sort of. It seems Inoa throws in the low 90s and can get it up to 94, but it doesn't sound like

he’s “a teen that throws high 90s”. Do you have a source on that?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 23, 2025 9:53 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I'll try to find it...

The report I remember reading was Inoa hitting 97 mph, sitting at 94-95.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:22 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Dewey Finn

You are going to ride this Dexter Fowler mancrush thing until it throws you off and runs you over aren’t you. Live in the last 15 minutes much?

by CoolCat23 on Dec 22, 2025 7:08 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Well

Fowler is putting it all together and his performance showed it this season.

IMO, he is just tapping into his vast potential.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:29 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Chris Carter - 100% in Agreement

Well, the list certainly on the whole is different. But one ranking I’m glad you did (which is where I ranked him, or so), is Chris Carter. Thankfully someone else realizing how terrible a player he may be and how many holes he has in his game.

by thudean on Dec 22, 2025 7:29 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

you look at his description of him though

and it describes adam dunn. not many teams would be upset with that out of a minor league first baseman, oakland especially.

sit*

by U-God on Dec 22, 2025 8:46 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Dunn

Is a crazy outlier of how players with such tools turn out. Carter also needs to have a great eye and take walks to have anywhere near the value of dunn.

by thudean on Dec 22, 2025 8:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

+1

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:27 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Also

Dunn hit for high average in the minors and has much greater plate discipline then Carter. Carter draws walks, strikes out, and hits power at a clip alarmingly similar to Rob Deer. Unfortunately he doesn’t have the same strong arm from RF.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Dec 22, 2025 11:35 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Is there really that big a difference between Lars Anderson and Kyle Blanks?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 22, 2025 8:36 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Significant difference IMO

Anderson has a more advanced approach at the plate with superior hitting skills.

He has the potential to be a special all-star calibre hitter, I don’t see this in Blanks.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:16 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Is either something more than a prospective .380/.480 guy?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 23, 2025 2:37 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Let's see, one's a Red Sox prospect, right?

That guy’s automatically better then.

by DrunkIrish on Dec 23, 2025 4:15 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

uh oh!

Please don’t instigate.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:35 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Hey

are you planning to submit this to the community synthesis top 100? I’m not seeing your name in my inbox ;)

by siddfynch on Dec 22, 2025 10:34 PM EST reply reply   0 recs

Sorry dude

What’s your email?

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 22, 2025 11:15 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Ivan DeJesus

Just wondering. I’m assuming its because of the seeming lack of upside, however

by Navi's_Navy on Dec 23, 2025 12:03 AM EST reply reply   0 recs

Bingo

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 12:12 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

But that does leave just Beckham, Andrus and Beckham as middle IF

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 23, 2025 2:39 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Ya...

Not very deep IMO. Guys like Antonelli and Brignac disappointed me. Cardenas is just overrated.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:20 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Reports of Brignac's Much-Improved Defense

don’t help the cause?

by Navi's_Navy on Dec 23, 2025 6:18 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Nah

Not at the expense of offense.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 8:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Derek Holland - Fits the Scott Kazmir/Jon Lester mold

What does this mean? What kind of mold is this? Those are two very, very different pitchers. That’s like saying someone fits the Tim Wakefield/Andy Pettitte mold.

by alskor on Dec 23, 2025 1:00 AM EST reply reply   0 recs

They don't have many similarities outside of that vague category though

Looking at 2008, Kazmir threw an overwhelming amount of fastballs, occasionally mixing in a slider or change. Lester used a very even distribution of fastballs, sliders, curves, and splitters. Kazmir has a much higher K rate, but walks more guys and is a flyball picther, whereas Lester is overall more efficient by limiting walks and getting guys to hit the ball on the ground half of the time (pitch to contact).

Lester averages 6 1/3 innings per start, whereas Kazmir averages 5 2/3 (that might not seem like much of a difference, but over the course of the season that’s a lot more innings that you’re relying on middle relief arms to get outs if you’re putting a Kazmir-type guy on the hill instead of a Lester-type guy).

by jibs on Dec 23, 2025 11:48 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Kazmir

Had to cut back on the sliders this year due to the injury (elbow) during spring training.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 3:27 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Alcides Escobar

Am I mistaken or did a top 10 prospect according to minorleagebaseball.com get left out of the top 99 of Dewey?

by ILuvDaBush on Dec 23, 2025 3:12 AM EST reply reply   0 recs

Dewey apparently prefers 1B who don't make a contribution other than hitting to MI who don't make

a contribution other than fielding

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 23, 2025 3:55 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

True

I don’t care for defensive specialists.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 3:26 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

With all due respect

That milb list was so ludicrous, that doesn’t mean very much. Escobar might make a top-100, but he really shouldn’t be higher than 80 or so

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 23, 2025 11:39 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Escobar's value

He’s got a lot of question marks still with the bat, but he’s ready to provide elite SS defense at the MLB level today. I think combining his current defense with the offensive potential he flashed in 2008 makes him definitely a top 40 guy in my eyes.

by jibs on Dec 23, 2025 11:54 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Even an excellent defensive SS

who is a marginal hitter is not a significantly above average major leaguer. He has value, yes, but not top-40 worth

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 24, 2025 2:20 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I guess it depends what you mean by "marginal hitter"

The average SS in 2008 had a .255 EqA. A SS with a .255 EqA and excellent defense is an easily above average player.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 24, 2025 7:51 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Disagree highly

… that the list was ludicrous. Especially since the most “ludicrous” aspect was the specific ranking in question.

by aCone419 on Dec 23, 2025 2:44 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Frankly, I think the Escobar pick was significantly better

than Scott Elbert at 37. Escobar will probably be an average major league starting SS and maybe an above average one. Elbert doesn’t look like much more than a good middle reliever. I’m not giving up on Nick Adenhart, but putting him at #35 is just a little too optimistic for my tastes. And I know some Yankee fans will be appalled, but I think Austin Jackson, who with the exception of a few months in Tampa has shown utterly average power and an acceptable eye, at #27 is incomprehensible as well - these are good prospects who may be good major leaguers, but are simply not in the same class as a number of other prospects.

As a rule, I think that you’re right that most of the list was perfectly fine - a number of their picks, including Esocbar’s, were so bizarre that ignoring them is probably wise.

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 24, 2025 2:27 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Where is...

Gio Gonzalez at? I think he needs to just put it all together and can be a Zito type for Oakland maybe

"Hello. My name is Matthew Berry. I am on a Fantasy Jihad. Prepare to be die!"

by Dominatio on Dec 23, 2025 7:18 AM EST reply reply   0 recs

Interesting comparison

Not sure Gio’s curve was as good as Zito’s, and dont think Gio has a good enough fastball.

Are we talking A’s Zito or Giants Zito? haha.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 3:25 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

maybe i mean to say oliver perez but a little more consistent?

"Hello. My name is Matthew Berry. I am on a Fantasy Jihad. Prepare to die!"

by Dominatio on Dec 24, 2025 6:41 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

More awful content from Dewey Finn!

How are the only three currently rec’d posts by this guy? By the looks of the comments, I’m not the only one who got a laugh out of these lists.

As much as I like Rhee (and I do like him), he should not be touching a top 100 list. Period.

by RedSoxFaithful on Dec 23, 2025 10:26 AM EST reply reply   0 recs

Aw...

I like cheering people up during the holidays.

Merry Christmas!

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:39 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Bryan Anderson for #100

Threw out 38% across AA & AAA as a 21-year-old, and seems certain to hit for average in the majors (.306 career mark while always one or two years young for his leagues). His error/passed ball numbers are in line with all other top backstop prospects—save Matt Wieters—so he looks to be a solid defender.

At worst, Anderson looks to be a .290/.360/.390 MLB catcher with average glovework, which would make him a top 10-12 guy in the majors. That’s his floor.

If he adds just a little pop, several years of .310/.380/.440 is well within reach, and that’s a top 5-6 guy.

Thought experiment: would you rather have a catcher who (in 500 ABs) hits .280, with 30 homers, 30 doubles, and 30 walks…or one who hits .310 with 10 HRs, 25 doubles, and 55 walks? The first guy (Arencibia type) looks sexier, but the second (Anderson type) is offensively identical overall, due to his OBP advantage.

by Mekonsrock on Dec 23, 2025 10:32 AM EST reply reply   0 recs

Solid arguments

I respect that.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 4:38 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

He's not listed...

Not a big fan of his.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 3:24 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Please elaborate on this

His defensive deficiencies are obvious but is there another reason?

by hiafex on Dec 24, 2025 4:49 AM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I like how he still wrote "knows how to get outs without plus stuff"

even though there was a whole fanpost dedicated to putting scouting reports right in front of his face that said he’s got very good stuff.

by NateHST on Dec 23, 2025 6:56 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Good does NOT mean PLUS

FYI

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 8:37 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

I'm aware of that, but let's not nitpick

You ignored all of the scouting reports that said he does have plus stuff. Have you seen the kid pitch or is this just a gut feeling?

by NateHST on Dec 23, 2025 8:47 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Per BA's 2009 Scouting Report...

Only the change up ranks at plus, and they even qualify that as “usually” plus. They ranked his breaking stuff as above-average. They also list his fastball at a lower velocity then A’s fans seem willing to accept. I don’t think there is anything wrong with claiming Anderson doesn’t have plus stuff. I might even agree with it.

by nixa37 on Dec 23, 2025 11:16 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Nope

I am aware of him and at this point, he only looks like a situational lefty reliever.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 23, 2025 11:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply   0 recs

Salome

I understand how you can be low on him, but why him below Arencibia who can run and crawl but never walk, and how much lower is he in your respect?

by Navi's_Navy on Dec 24, 2025 12:47 AM EST reply reply   0 recs


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dewey_finn_small
Dewey's Hot 99 Prospects
Dewey_finn_small
Dewey's Report Card: The "B" List
Dewey_finn_small
Dewey's Report Card: The "A" List

Recent FanPosts

Small
Another top 100 list
Super_grover_small
Need a little help finding SS prospects ready to play in the Show
Small
Teixeira to the Yankees
Small
Prospect Smackdown: Dexter Fowler v. Daryl Jones
Small
Fantasy draft: MadBum or Hanson
Small
A Relative Newcomer's Top-100 List
Batmanbaseball_small
Community Prospect List: #111
Mets 2007 1s Pick Calls it Quits?
Dago1_small
Dynasty League Openings

New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter
Site Meter