Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
New Blog: And Down The Stretch They Come, horse racing!

BA Oakland A's top 10


http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2010/269399.html

 

 

TOP TEN
PROSPECTS
1. Chris Carter, of/1b
2. Michael Taylor, of
3. Grant Green, ss
4. Max Stassi, c
5. Pedro Figueroa, lhp
6. Tyson Ross, rhp
7. Jemile Weeks, 2b
8. Grant Desme, of
9. Adrian Cardenas, inf
10. Sean Doolittle, of

PROJECTED 2013
LINEUP
Catcher Max Stassi
First Base Sean Doolittle
Second Base Jemile Weeks
Third Base Adrian Cardenas
Shortstop Grant Green
Left Field Michael Taylor
Center Field Rajai Davis
Right Field Grant Desme
Designated Hitter Chris Carter
No. 1 Starter Brett Anderson
No. 2 Starter Trevor Cahill
No. 3 Starter Pedro Figueroa
No. 4 Starter Tyson Ross
No. 5 Starter Vin Mazzaro
Closer Andrew Bailey

Poll
Your Oakland A's Top Prospect?

  214 votes | Results

0 recs  |  Comment 84 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Minor League Ball

Oakland Athletics Top 20 Prospects for 2010

Dec 2009 by John Sickels - 256 comments

Scouting Report: Midland Rockhounds

Aug 2009 by John Sickels - 7 comments

Around SB Nation

Kouzmanoff + For Hairston & Cunningham -- 4 Reasons To Like This Trade

Jan 2010 from Athletics Nation - 536 comments

Down on the Farm: John Sickel's Top 20 Oakland A's Prospects for 2010

Dec 2009 from FakeTeams - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Interesting List

I’m not really sure where to start:
-I like where Grant Green is placed
-I’m OK with the Stassi love
-Figueroa and Ross seem really high to me
-I’m surprised Doolittle made the list
-BA sure did jump off of the Ynoa bandwagon quickly. I agree with him being left off, but I don’t see how BA can justify it considering where they ranked him last year.

by jar75 on Jan 20, 2026 3:35 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree...

on Ynoa. They sure did jump off really fast. I would have thought he would have at least made the top ten for them. I might rank him 10th on talent, but I he wouldn’t be any higher than that. Also, I don’t know much about Figueroa. Anyone have any info on him? What is his upside and what kind of pitcher is he?

by joegonzo on Jan 20, 2026 3:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seem like BA sticks WAG at #10

just so they can say: “hey we had him in top 10” if player develops and bury said player if he turns out to be a total bust. You know, it’s hard to brag if your lower-rated guys do too well, because the subsequent question is: “hey, why didn’t we rank him higher?”

by slacker george on Jan 20, 2026 9:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Self-replying is a mental disorder

My point isn’t that Doolittle is a WAG, but that Ynoa would be a typical BA #1 WAG.

by slacker george on Jan 20, 2026 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cut me Mick, I'm bleeding from my misposts.

Meant that Ynoa would be a typical BA #10 WAG.

I must cut off these damn fingers before I start making sense.

by slacker george on Jan 20, 2026 9:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 10:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

WAG?

I get the gist, but that’s an acronym I’m not familiar with.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 1:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

WAG = Way Away Guy

meaning he’s a ways away from the major leagues…

I’ve never seen it myself…

by okteds on Jan 21, 2026 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wild Ass Guess, maybe?

http://sonicliving.com

by whaxed on Jan 21, 2026 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

This is the usage I’m familiar with.

by FI2 on Jan 21, 2026 3:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Figueroa seems to like Figueroa

He was on their radar as a potential rule 5 choice in 2008. Then made several of their league top 20 lists.

  1. in CA league top 20
  2. MWL top 20

http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/league-top-20-prospects/2009/268949.html

by Asfan4ever723 on Jan 20, 2026 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m sure I’ll get blasted but I’m just not buying Carter. I’d take Taylor, possibly Green ahead of him. I really like Stassi but that would be insane. Haha I’ve got Carter ahead of Green on my current rankings but, thinking long term, I’d probably have a real hard time deciding between Green and Carter.

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 3:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'm starting to wonder how BA creates their lists.

No Ynoa? 4-5 of Stassi and Figueroa?? I like Stassi a lot, but he’s years away and I hardly think he’s the A’s 4th best prospect. I think an argument could be made for Figueroa in the top 10-12 but at 5? Cardenas continues to get underrated and I really don’t get it. He hit .326/.392/.446 as a 21 year old in AA, and his 2nd stint in AAA was nearly as impressive. I don’t expect him to be an elite 2nd/3rd baseman but he should be a very solid regular for many years. A .300/.370/.430 major league line doesn’t seem at all out of reach for him so why is he being considered a worse prospect now then he was at this point last year?? It’s almost like these lists just get created to suprise everyone with the rankings.

by JPShark on Jan 20, 2026 4:04 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

BA has long saw Cardenas as a LF haven’t they? Perhaps they just don’t think he has much upside and consider him a low ceiling/high floor type of guy?

I can’t really speak much about Figueroa and I actually like Stassi enough that being that high doesn’t bother me much but I’m not a A’s fan. The Ynoa rating is a bit peculiar given their grade last year.

It should also be said that Jim Shonerd wrote the list and not one of the normal BA guys. I actually dislike that they bring in all of those different writers but that is mostly because I don’t know who half of them are (I don’t know who Shonerd is for example). I guess my point is this list may not really reflect Callis or Manuel’s opinion of the system.

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 4:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well I haven't heard anything about a Cardenas move to LF

but if that was the case I could see where it would definitely hurt his value as a prospect. That said, I don’t think thats whats going to happen and as long as he sticks somewhere between 2B and 3B his bat should play well enough for either. I’m not a huge believer in his power developing, but I am a believer in his ability to hit. He’s a line drive hitter that looks as though won’t have much trouble consistently hitting near or above .300, with a lot of doubles. All in all he had a better season then his 2008, yet the majority of lists I see drop him lower then he was ranked last year and I just don’t see the justification at this point. My main gripe with Ynoa being left off is the fact that they were so high on him last year. His status as a prospect really hasn’t changed all that much since last year, yet he’s been completely left off of the list. I see good points in arguments from both sides of the spectrum on Ynoa, as he really could be ranked anywhere from 1-15 on these lists depending on your preference for upside vs. performance but I personally think he ranks somewhere in the 4-8 range for the Athletics.

by JPShark on Jan 20, 2026 4:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ben Badler made the list last year, depending on just how much control the author has over the list, that could very well be the reason for the drastically different approaches with Ynoa.

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 4:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This post is literally the first time I've ever heard the words "Cardenas" and "left field" in the same sentence.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2026 4:34 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Before he was even dealt to Oakland BA was saying that was his likely destination in the future. I don’t believe they didn’t think he could stick in the middle infield due to his D and wouldn’t hit enough for a corner infield spot. *The world doesn’t revolve around A’s news, Cardenas was a player before Beane acquired him. ;)

*Meant to be sarcasm, it’s too bad you have to specify.

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 4:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When it comes to evaluating defense,

I trust the A’s a zillion times more than I trust BA.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2026 4:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Has Cardenas actually done anything to suggest

2B/3B will be a problem for him defensively?

I like Cindi. A. She never pretends to know more than she does. B. She has unbridled enthusiasm for her "Hotties," and isn't afraid to show it. -IM4Oakgal

by Nico on Jan 20, 2026 4:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you do Paul, I imagine you trust the A’s on every single decision an organization could possibly pass judgment on all the way down to Coke vs Pepsi. Not saying you are wrong to do so but it is their list so should be their opinion. I guess that is the confusion I have, just how much control over each individual team list does the author have? I already think their League top 20’s aren’t worth much because it isn’t even BA’s opinion.

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 4:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

…I should probably add the coaches/scouts who do have input on the League top 20’s is nice but they just seem all over the place every year with very little correlation with their actual rankings.

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 4:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This comment indicates either that you have never read anything I've ever written,

or that you are intentionally ignoring it to score a cheapo rhetorical point. I go after the A’s’ stupid decisions every bit as hard as I do anyone else’s.

I mean, did you not see this thread? It was posted like four days ago. That’s just the most recent example that I can spot at this site! Forget all the commentary at AN (which I don’t know if you read or not).

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2026 5:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So there is some facet of player development or scouting that you would take BA’s opinion on over the A’s organization? I wasn’t necessarily calling you a homer…

by jfish26101 on Jan 20, 2026 8:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, I'd be more inclined to believe a scouting report on a player's hitting from BA than from the A's org

Ideally, you’d have some decent statistical information that you could use to help decide between the two, but that may not be available at the lower levels. If it just came down to a “they said, they said” battle of scouting reports, I’d take BA’s.

But on defense? I’d prefer Oakland’s. They have something of an institutional bias, but it’s outweighed by the fact that they’re SO much better informed about how to evaluate players.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 1:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? You would take BA’s scouting over the Athletics scouting? That really surprises me.

by jfish26101 on Jan 21, 2026 7:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

a writer’s over a scout’s? why?

by richieabernathy on Jan 21, 2026 9:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The writer is just writing up what scouts have told him

And I presume BA talks to scouts both inside and outside the organization, thus providing a less biased perspective.

by aCone419 on Jan 21, 2026 5:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't recall BA ever saying such a thing

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jan 20, 2026 6:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You can hear the internet? OMG

/shameful pedantry

by aCone419 on Jan 20, 2026 9:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Figueroa

Placed inside the top 10 of two different league top 20 lists. Maybe there are those who disagree with BA’s assessment of him, but at least they’re consistent with their love for him.

by mrkupe on Jan 21, 2026 4:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Horrible list

Utterly horrible.

People are correct to note the bizarre treatment of Ynoa, whose inclusion high on their lists last year now looks like a transparently sensationalist hype job.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 20, 2026 4:40 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Or that different authors have different takes

The team lists are made by individual BA writers. The guy who did this year’s list has never done an organizational prospect list for BA before.

by Danny on Jan 20, 2026 5:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also

Perhaps they have changed their minds after a full calendar year.

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Jan 20, 2026 5:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not quite

Callis, Manuel, et al. have to approve the lists and they make suggestions to the author about who should be moved up and down.

by jar75 on Jan 20, 2026 6:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This big a difference is pretty close to inexcusable

I would need an explanation.

There was no performance before, only projection. There is till just projection, and its basically the same projection.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 6:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

BA's willingness to admit mistakes is legendary

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jan 20, 2026 8:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But how can you call it a mistake NOW?

Everybody who pays attention here and at AN knows I hate the aggressive ranking of Ynoa. It’s not that I have no faith in him, but I just don’t believe in ranking guys who’ve done nothing over those who have. I won’t rehash that whole argument. That said, I completely agree with those here who wonder how they can rank him so high last year and not at all this year. That’s just silly to me.

I could see a minor downgrade, maybe, but that’s it.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 20, 2026 8:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ynoa just missed the Top 10

It’s not like they kicked him out of the Top 30

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jan 20, 2026 11:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But last year he was #3.

More importantly, #1, 2, 4, 7, and 8 all graduated. And #10 was James Simmons, who fell off the prospect map. So in a way, he fell a TON.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 21, 2026 3:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not really...

he wasn’t going to pitch much anyway, maybe just instructionals.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 9:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was definitely going to pitch in some form of short-season ball

Even if it was just the AZL. There is absolutely no way that “the best 16 year old ever” wasn’t going to throw professional innings this year, health not being a factor.

That he was unable to throw a single inning this year is a fairly obvious demerit.

Now I absolutely think Ynoa was overranked last year, by both BA and KG, but “super-projectable-now-stuff 16 year old” sounds better than “super-projectable-now-stuff 17 year old… with an injury history,” so I down see what’s so crazy about them downgrading him.

by aCone419 on Jan 20, 2026 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, that's all Im saying

They didnt have big plans for him this year anyway and considering his age it wouldn’t take much for them to just hold him back.

He’s probably on the extended spring training and then short season track for 2010, too.

So, unless it was a major injury (and we have no indication it was) I can’t see that and him missing time in 09 could downgrade him so seriously. Is it a downgrade? Sure. Off the top 10? I dont really see how it could change anyone’s opinion that much. That’s hard to justify to me.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Look, I don’t think he should have been so highly ranked to begin with, but teenager’s with an injury history (even if it isn’t “major”) should give anyone pause.

As for being off the top ten, Shonerd said in the chat that he just missed. Say that makes him #12 (for arguments sake). If he had been ranked #8 rather than #12, would that have really mattered that much?

by aCone419 on Jan 20, 2026 11:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he belongs in the top 10

But I don’t see how BA’s opinion could change that drastically. He was ranked #3 last year and Oakland graduated a lot of talent.

by jar75 on Jan 20, 2026 11:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think #8 would have been hard to explain

and #12 is kind of ridiculous.

Flat out, they were either wrong last year or theyre wrong this year. Nothing has really changed that much for him. IMO, there is just no way, given the information we have that you could rank him #3 one year and #11 the next and remain logically consistent.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 11:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and Im not making an argument at all about where he should be ranked, bear that in mind

All Im saying is you cant rank a teenage IFA pitching project that highly entirely on projection and scouting one year and then 12 months later decide he’s now WAY down the list. There’s no logic in that at all.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 11:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

When your value is almost all projection

having a injury history of any sort is a much bigger deal.

You can disagree (I’m not even sure I agree with it myself), but acting as though it’s an unjustifiable change is silly.

by aCone419 on Jan 21, 2026 12:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was fucking 16!

How many 16-year-olds go through the next 5-ish years without any arm injuries? 5%? 10%, at most? The term “injury nexus” exists for a reason…

This risk should have been taken into account to begin with in the form of lower grades. But that wouldn’t have sold prospect books in the way that blowing his value completely out of proportion did.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 1:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t disagree with any of this.

by aCone419 on Jan 21, 2026 5:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

To Americanize this:

Ynoa as a 2009 prospect was equivalent to an elite High School talent who had just finished his junior year, one who sort of like Bryce Harper was already getting “penciled in” as the top prep pitcher in the following year’s draft. Ynoa then is forced to sit out and miss not only all of his Senior season in high school with an elbow injury, but also is unable to pitch at all in any of the June/July AAU tourneys or Showcase events.

I would say that the above fact pattern would have a SIGNIFICANT impact on a player’s draft slot. If you agree, why should it not also have a SIGNIFICANT impact on said player’s prospect ranking?

Fat man is no more,
Bursting on through Heaven's Door
Come on in, says Bill

by Wilbur Wood on Jan 21, 2026 7:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm like 90% certain that Ynoa would have been pitching had he been a free agent.

The A’s treated it with kid gloves for what should be fairly obvious reasons— they wanted to protect their investment, and having him throw a few innings in short-season ball isn’t worth whatever risk it might have created.

If he was still in the “prove himself to talent evaluators” phase, I really doubt he’d have been kicking back all season.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 7:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ehh..

Figueroa and Ross too high. Cardenas too low. Corey Brown should prob be 10th spot over Doolittle.

"Carter's 25-game hitting streak isn't any normal streak. He's 46 for 97 (.474 average) during the run, adding 16 walks and compiling 81 total bases in the process. I'm out of superlatives for what he's doing." - Kevin Goldstein

by Syphon on Jan 20, 2026 4:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No Josh Donaldson surprised me. Really like him athough his value is tied up in shaky defense/positional adjustment

Also, Carter over Taylor is surprising. Its very hard for an average 1B at best to compete with what should be a slightly above average corner OF. Will Carter’s bat be 10 runs better than Taylor’s every year? We’ll see.

by Navi's_Navy on Jan 20, 2026 5:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

good write up and chat

I am not that familiar with jim shonerd but I thought rankings aside the write up and chat answers were some of the best of the top 10 series.

by tugboat11 on Jan 20, 2026 6:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'm surprised by the recent anti-Cardenas trend

John’s done it, and now BA. I just don’t know what part of his 2009 warrants it. Where’s Nico to copy and paste the “Cardenas is getting screwed” post again? He did a better job of it than I could.

I can’t see him being any lower than 4th, behind Carter, Taylor, and Green. Maybe, just maybe, Weeks can sneak ahead of him. But that’s it for me.

As for Carter/Taylor. I can’t decide! I love them both. I think I might lean towards Taylor because I always like the guy who is more of a sure bet to be a quality major leaguer a bit more. I think Carter will hit well, but there’s definitely a possibility he won’t. I think Taylor is almost a guarantee to be solid.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 20, 2026 8:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

What's so great about Cardenas?

A plus hit tool/skill

He doesnt have a great approach or much power, and his defense is still a question mark.

He’s overrated around here a good bit IMHO. I think the rankings you’re seeing are much more realistic.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 9:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+7

well said. Never been a fan.

by slamcactus on Jan 20, 2026 9:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm curious what you dislike about Cardenas' approach.

His problem is that he doesn’t have power or speed, and his defense is pushing him toward areas where it’s hard to get by without either.

As far as his hit tool and approach, they’re both great.

by PissedMick on Jan 20, 2026 10:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree the big issues are athleticism and power, but his approach has also been questioned. I wouldn’t call it great (despite good BB rates in the minors - its more than that) nor would I call it a weakness. Its not a strength, though.

From BP’s A’s top 11 a few weeks back:

he’s improved his plate discipline to at least average.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9891

Not a big concern for me, but again, this is a player whose defense is a question mark and who will have to consistently hit for high averages to be valuable. I guess Im just saying Im fine with where John, KG and BA ranked him. Give me Weeks, who despite his question marks (which are overstated IMO) has a number of things he does really well - like defense, approach, contact, the power was surprisingly good and he’s extremely fast.

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 10:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Weeks

Nobody really seems to like Weeks that much. He’s got some plate discipline, he makes decent contact, and he runs well. His power isn’t much to talk about, Cal League helping out a guy who is ALL gap power.. Defense is okay. Also very fragile.

I guess I could see utility guy out of him, but the lack of power alone is pretty damning.

by mrkupe on Jan 20, 2026 11:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have a drastically different opinion on him.

Here’s BP’s write up:


Weeks’ tools rank with anyone of the system. Like older brother Rickie, Weeks’ bat speed is off the charts and, despite his size, he’s shown an ability to punish mistakes, and projects to hit 15-20 home runs annually. He’s a 60 runner on the 20-80 scouting scale and knows how to use his speed on the bases. He also has an excellent understanding of the strike zone, which should lead to 70-90 walks annually.
http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9891

I see more like his brother, but with more power. The question for me is health

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 11:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

more power than Rickie?

Rickie had more than 15-20 HR power. His problem was always making consistently good contact . . .I sometimes wonder if he could actually have TOO MUCH bat speed for his own good.

by mrkupe on Jan 21, 2026 12:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rickie has never hit more than 16 in a season

though he’s only 26. I love Rickie, though. Love him game. I see a very similar and maybe slightly more polished player in his brother (came from a major college program). I suppose the power is still a question for Jemile (Im probably full of crap on that Jemile more power than Rickie now that I think about it, Rickie’s just kind of disappointed me on that front for a few years running…), but its not a huge question IMO. I love his swing and see the projection there.

Here’s some more quotes (not as an argument towards any point! just adding to the conversation):

The only concern at this point is Weeks’ inability to stay healthy. He has a leadoff man’s approach, surprising power for his size, and speed that’s well above-average

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9623

Jemile Weeks, Athletics (US): A monster athlete, he flirted with .400 during his first month, and can surprise people with his power.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9219

Jemile Weeks, 2B, Athletics (High-A Stockton)
Is anybody noticing this? I constantly hear from readers and people in the business about nearly every top prospect around, but nobody has brought up Weeks. Since making his debut at the end of May, it’s hard to find a guy more locked in at the plate; the 2008 first-round pick has begun his year with a 22-game hitting streak during which he is hitting .400/.481/.711. His bat speed is outstanding, his power (seven home runs in 90 ABs) is even better than expected, and his defense at second base has been surprisingly solid, as he’s committed just two errors. If you’re keeping your own charts for either real or fantasy purposes, move this guy way up.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9146

Yarky1
(17617)

Before the season, you listed Weeks as the college draftee not in the top 100 most likely to move into the list next year. Is that happening? Does he look like a top-50 prospect and a future star?

Kevin Goldstein
BP staff
(27460)

It’s happening. I’m not sure about the top 50 yet.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=9146

While Weeks is constantly compared to his older brother Rickie (Brewers), he’s actually a very different player, with a better all-around set of tools. He has an advanced feel for the strike zone, makes good contact, has at least gap power with some projection for more, and plus-plus speed. He has above-average range at second base, and a good throwing arm.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8551

Joey (Oakland)

Please evaluate the taylor for wallace swap? Also, are the A’s moving cardenas to third smart or dumb?

Jim Callis (2:17 PM)

I like Wallace more as a hitter, but the A’s have tons of 1B/DH types, and Taylor makes a lot more sense for them. If Oakland has decided Jemile Weeks is their second baseman of the future, then it’s smart to move Cardenas.

http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/id/30095

The knock on him was he was cruising on tools in college. So there was a perception he was a project kind of kid. His skills looked surprisingly developed in pro ball, and he really has phenomenal tools. The issues with him are: 1) Health; 2) Effort; and 3) Platoon split. None of them concern me terribly… do people really think his ceiling is less than that of Cardenas? I cant see the argument for that at all. Really, I think Weeks is terribly underrated on this site… I have no clue why. Maybe we have a lot of closet Seminoles fans…?

by alskor on Jan 21, 2026 12:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

underrated

by svigen on Jan 21, 2026 1:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I am a bit skeptical of his power, but I do agree with most of this post.

by jar75 on Jan 21, 2026 9:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Phenomenal tools?

The knock on him in college was actually that his raw tools really WEREN’T that good, but he was praised for being very polished and for getting the most he can out of those tools. He is the very opposite of a project player who doesn’t give enough effort to be a top player.

He is certainly fast which gives him good range at 2B, although he is limited by an average throwing arm. He’s a decent contact hitter but not a great one. His power projects to be no better than fringe-average . . .when people say his power is “surprising” they mean “surprising that this guy isn’t slugging .370”, not “could hit 20 home runs one day”. He MIGHT have enough power to challenge advanced pitchers, although the fact that he’s already struggling with that at AA should give pause.

That is an okay set of tools, but it’s nowhere close to “phenomenal”. Ryan Westmoreland has phenomenal tools. Jemile Weeks does not. He has a respectable ceiling but it’s owed much more to his improving defense at 2B than his bat.

by mrkupe on Jan 21, 2026 11:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Im not sure where you're getting that. Not at all how I remember it, and everything I check says great tools, lacks polish for a college player
It’s a difficult thing to figure out with players like Weeks. College players are generally seen as a more polished product, yet Weeks is player many of whose accomplishments come from pure athleticism. He’s a plus-plus runner with bat speed-based power who is the most exciting player on nearly any college field, but at the same time, he’s still raw at the plate, in the field, and on the basepaths. That leaves teams with incredibly mixed feelings about Rickie’s younger brother. In one camp, there are those who see a player who is a project and already 21 years old, and the other group wonders just how good he can be if he learns how to translate his tools into skills.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7604

He’s a different beast from his brother, equally as short but a good 20-30 pounds less than the compactly-built Brewers second baseman. He has his brother’s bat speed, and his power comes from that, not strength, and he’s a much better runner

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7199

Jemile Weeks, Miami
Weeks isn’t as physically talented as his older brother, but he’s not lacking for tools. He has 70 speed on the 20-80 scouting scale and unlike Rickie, he’s a quality defender who leaves no doubt that he can play second base. His bat isn’t as dynamic as his brother’s, but he projects as a leadoff hitter and has shown occasional pop.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=3252909

Lonestar (Deep in the heart of Texas): Where does Jemile Weeks currently slot? Would he be too much of a risk for the Twins at #14? Seems like a perfect fit.

Kevin Goldstein: 14 seems a little high, but he could work his way up there. He’s added a power element to his game, and his kind of athleticism is hard to find in the college ranks this year. I’ll have much more on him in part 2 of the draft notebook later this week.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=447

ashitaka (long beach, ca): Hey KG! Jemile Weeks seems to be progressing nicely this season. What is his ceiling and timetable? Do you think he sticks at 2B?

Kevin Goldstein: I think he sticks at second, he’s actually been better than expected there, and the athleticism is outstanding. There’s star possibility there as an absolutely ideal No. 2 hitter.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=629

Greg (NYC): Hi Kevin, any idea what the word is on Jemile Weeks’ injury (I figure he’s local for you)? How quickly do you think he can move through the Oakland system? For someone who’s an unpolished toolsy guy, he sure seems to put up good numbers.

Kevin Goldstein: Hip flexor and they’re taking it easy with him. When I think of Weeks’ issues, most of them for me are defensive.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=504

26. Jemile Weeks, 2B, Miami
What He Is: A leaner, faster, less powerful version of his brother, Rickie.
In A Perfect World He Becomes: A 20/40 second baseman.
Backup Plan: He certainly his the athleticism to give center field a try.
Open Issues: He gets by on athleticism right now; his defense and base running need work.

http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7611

although he is limited by an average throwing arm.

Posted this above:


While Weeks is constantly compared to his older brother Rickie (Brewers), he’s actually a very different player, with a better all-around set of tools. He has an advanced feel for the strike zone, makes good contact, has at least gap power with some projection for more, and plus-plus speed. He has above-average range at second base, and a good throwing arm.
http://baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8551

although the fact that he’s already struggling with that at AA should give pause.

The fact his power didn’t show up in AA in his first full season in a SSS doesnt give me the slightest pause. He showed pretty decent power this year - more than expected, and I posted many power expectations higher than a SLG of .370 quality. 15-20 HR is reasonable, IMHO.

That is an okay set of tools, but it’s nowhere close to "phenomenal". Ryan Westmoreland has phenomenal tools. Jemile Weeks does not.

He may not have Westmoreland tools, sure, so we can quibble over the term “phenomenal,” but the fact remains he has some of the better tools in the minor leagues. If he moves to CF, for instance, isnt he a poor man’s Desmond Jennings(injury and power question marks as well)?

by alskor on Jan 21, 2026 2:09 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, Im full of crap. Rickie will still probably end up more powerful than Jemile

I really do still think Rickie will have that breakout year… one of these years…

I do think Jemile’s power will surprise, though.

by alskor on Jan 21, 2026 12:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Plus...

The consensus does seem to like him more than Cardenas (like me). BP and BA both did, and John had them #5 and #6, and with the same grade…

by alskor on Jan 20, 2026 11:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

seems like solid B to me

The kid really can hit. His approach is pretty decent actually . . .and while he’ll probably never be a big home run hitter, he should hit tons of doubles.

Not a star type of player, but a guy I can see being a regular for some time.

by mrkupe on Jan 20, 2026 10:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Is Placido Polanco a good comp?

Good hit tool, doubles power and average plate discipline… obviously Polanco is a better defender, but it’s what always comes to mind when I see Cardenas.

President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.

by demondeaconsbaseball on Jan 21, 2026 1:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's a comp I've heard before

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 21, 2026 3:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bill Mueller is the one that seemed to resonate the best over at AN

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 3:33 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If so, I don't understand why you think he's overrated

because Bill Mueller had a very good career. Eyeballing it, I’ve got him at about 30 WAR over his career.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 7:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I dont think Cardenas is overrated in general

Just around here he gets an inordinate amount of love, in my opinion. I argued for raising his grade to a straight B in the other thread. I do like Weeks more than him, but that’s a different story, as I have Weeks very high compared to most. Plus, as I linked above, Cardenas really isnt rated all that highly by most experts… and I think I DO like him better than them, but still less than many here and less than Weeks (though theyre pretty close to eachother).

I agree Bill Meuller as a comp is a good one, but that doesnt necessarily mean I think that’s the kind of career he’s going to have. Mueller’s career WAR is skewed by many knee injuries as well. They just have similar skill sets, though Mueller, at least by the time he got to Boston, was likely a better defender and a more patient hitter than Im projecting for Cardenas. Similar type of players though (if Cardenas stays at 3B), and with an excellent contact skill.

by alskor on Jan 21, 2026 8:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The only reason Cardenas' defense is a question mark is...

the A’s just decided to switch him to 3B permanently. And the only bad thing anyone has said about his limited time at 3B thus far is they don’t think his bat profiles well at the corner. His defensive tools profile better at 3B than 2B and the main thing he needs now is experience.

I am a little worried about the power and I don’t think he’ll ever be a big HR hitter but he did show he could find the gaps enough to hit 40+ doubles.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Jan 20, 2026 11:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His defense really isn't a "question mark"

It doesn’t really project as any worse than 0 run defense (slightly below average at 2B or 3B), which in turn would mean that his value would be wrapped up in his bat. It’s pretty easy to see him reliably turning out .300/.370/.430 seasons that are worth 4 WAR or so.

I second the notion that ranking him as low as 9th is utterly ridiculous. Players who hit that well in AA/AAA (second stint) at age 21 and are even semi-competent defensively are unlikely to be worse than at least league-average.

Ranking Weeks, who has shown a level of injury-proneness in his time in the minors that even Chris Snelling would be proud of, above him is patent silliness.

Shawn Spencer: "I’m receiving a transmission from your husband. Really more of a voicemail, if I'm being honest. A status update. Perhaps a twitter."
Burton Guster: "I believe it’s called a tweet."
Shawn Spencer: "There’s no way I’m saying that."

by PaulThomas on Jan 21, 2026 1:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He was 21 this year

And, yes, a lot of his success will be tied to a high average. I don’t see why that’s necessarily a bad thing. I don’t think he profiles as a guy who all of a sudden won’t hit for average at a higher level.

If he’ll only be really successful as a .300 hitter, I won’t argue with that. But I need to know why you think he can’t or won’t be a .300 hitter.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jan 21, 2026 3:47 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Community Prospect #32
Small
Runoff for Community Prospect #31
Small
Community Prospect #31
Small
Communit Prospect #30
Headshot_small
John's Farm System Rankings

Recent FanPosts

Small
Project Prospect Top 10 Prospect List
Zz_small
Another "Rank these players" post
Small
BP Braves Top 11
Small
Long-Term Catcher Question
Small
Trade offer/Thoughts
Small
Brad Holt
Small
BA Oakland A's top 10
Small
Clay Buchholz

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

In Association With

MLB -- FanHouse

  • Expectations Lowered, Eric Chavez Readies for Comeback in New Role
  • Flexibility for Mariners Comes With King Felix's Extension
  • Dodgers Re-Sign Vicente Padilla
  • Ricky Nolasco Could Earn Extension

Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter