Either/Or: Domonic Brown or Mike Trout?
If you could have Domonic Brown or Mike Trout for your favorite team's farm system, who would you pick and why?
Brown is closer to the majors and has more present power, and has terrific tools. But Trout's upside is outstanding, he'll be a better defender and probably keep his speed longer. And he's younger. Is Trout the more attractive property, or does the fact that Brown is closer to the majors and has shown more power trump Trout's benefits in your mind?
This isn't so much "who is the better prospect" as "who would you want for your favorite team's farm system?" In other words, consider context, too.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Trout
Far superior defense at a more premium position with similar, if not greater, upside with the bat
by jaroche6 on Feb 14, 2026 5:11 PM EST reply actions
Easy choice for Jays fans is Trout
Right handed bat to replace Vernon Wells and the speed and youth compliments the rest of the roster.
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Feb 14, 2026 5:14 PM EST reply actions
Regarddless of context . . .
Id prefer Trout
1) I’d dont believe Brown is going to be the better hitter here, even as a corner outfielder vs a centerfielder
2) Even If I did have a great CF, and no good corner OF’s, I’d take Trout. You can always move the better ballplayer easier. Perhaps as a real life GM it is a bit more problematic but, I still think Id take who I percieve as the best ballplayer.
"If my uniform doesn't get dirty, I haven't done anything in the baseball game." - Rickey Henderson
by casejud on Feb 14, 2026 5:21 PM EST reply actions
I'm not sure how context matters
Both are outfielders.
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects for 2011!
Come check out Bullpen Banter!
Follow Bullpen Banter on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JD Sussman on Feb 14, 2026 5:27 PM EST reply actions
I'm thinking it would matter to Seattle.......
knowing that Ichiro could play CF I see Brown as the better fit because he’s ready now and for the power potential for a lineup that’s short on it.
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Feb 14, 2026 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
It doesn't matter where an OF plays
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects for 2011!
Come check out Bullpen Banter!
Follow Bullpen Banter on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JD Sussman on Feb 14, 2026 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
Context....Brewers would take Brown because they're all in for 2011
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Feb 15, 2026 1:08 AM EST up reply actions
makes sense there
But, where would he play? Hart in CF?
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects for 2011!
Come check out Bullpen Banter!
Follow Bullpen Banter on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JD Sussman on Feb 15, 2026 7:35 AM EST up reply actions
Sure, Hart has good wheels so he could be league average in CF imo
Seems like most people were posting as if this was a prospect smackdown and even when fans like McCuthistruth. point out that Pit already has “2 speedy CF types” they are being savaged for passing on Trout’s potential. Even if you believe that Brown has a lower floor than Trout, you can’t discount the fact that many fans would prefer Brown because he’s ready to compete immediately.
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Feb 15, 2026 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
Trout
Brown will have more power and a better arm but thats about it
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on Feb 14, 2026 5:29 PM EST reply actions
Brown if his swing is refined could be a monster
He could be Howard or Utley with speed.
by Bravesin07 on Feb 14, 2026 5:37 PM EST reply actions
Isn't Utley with speed still Utley?
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 20, 2026 2:07 AM EST up reply actions
Trout
Braves could use a CF’er and a top of the order guy..Mike would give them that…for non baseball reasons, he’s a local Jersey guy who I watched his senior year and would love watching him grow as a Brave…alas, that aint happening.
by jerzbravesboy24 on Feb 14, 2026 5:42 PM EST reply actions
Trout is going nowhere
If the Angels trade him, I will convert to whatever team Trout is on :)
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on Feb 15, 2026 1:20 AM EST up reply actions
As a Pirates fan....
I would easily take Trout. Even with McCutchen already roaming center. I would keep Trout in CF and move McCutchen to left with Tabata taking over in right. I believe in Trout’s power potential. I can see him topping 20 homers most of his career with outstanding speed and good defense. Brown would probably make more sense as he could play RF, but Trout is tthe better overall player. I would rather have the better talent and figure out what to do with them then have a lesser player because I already have someone playing that position. In other words: Talent>Need.
ETHAN MARTIN!!!!
by joegonzo on Feb 14, 2026 5:58 PM EST reply actions
Domonic Brown a 'lesser player'?
I mean I agree with your basic argument in theory (as far as talent &/or need), but I don’t think there’s the chasm between these two prospects is as great as the poll results & most comments thus far seem to make it out to be.
Brown has perennial All Star/franchise batter upside & he is a gifted athlete as well. I think Brown is pretty much a sure bet to be a very good major leaguer & this question isn’t cut & dry, but besides pure speed I wouldn’t say that Mike Trout is clearly more gifted than Brown.
by Matt0330 on Feb 14, 2026 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
LOL
Joegonzo I actually posted before I read your post, so its funny how we have differing viewpoints.
I think the talent is close enough you can start picking for need. Personally I like the closer, higher floor, more powerful RF than the further away, higher ceiling, speedier CF.
Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Feb 14, 2026 6:56 PM EST up reply actions
honestly i like trouts floor better than brown
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on Feb 14, 2026 7:46 PM EST up reply actions
I do...
I think their is a significant gap between the two players. Sure, Dom Brown could be a perenial all star and is more of a sure thing, but I think Trout has superstar upside. A very rare player in my opinion. I could be wrong, but I don’t believe I will be. I would take Trout over anyone at this point.
ETHAN MARTIN!!!!
by joegonzo on Feb 14, 2026 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
minor leaguer...
any minor leaguer. lol
ETHAN MARTIN!!!!
by joegonzo on Feb 14, 2026 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
First
I probably like floor better than most and brown is going to be a solid regular at worst with much better upside than that (albeit not Trout’s upside).
Second, as a Pirates fan I think Brown in RF starting out of ST or mid-season fits much better than Trout in a year or two, especially considering we already have 2 speedy CF type players in our OF.
Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Feb 14, 2026 6:44 PM EST reply actions
I take talent...
first every time. It’s like choosing Corey Hart over Joey Votto becuase you already have Alert Pujols. Why choose the lesser player if you can make it fit? I would be happy with either one, but I take Trout because of the potential. Trout would let us move McCutchen to left and Tabata to right. That defensive outfield would be insane. Not to mention we would be one of the fastest teams in the league while also having good power. We might be faced with another situation like this soon. Anthony Rendon or Matt Purke? We have Alvarez at 3rd, but Rendon has more talent than Purke. I would take Rendon easily.
ETHAN MARTIN!!!!
by joegonzo on Feb 14, 2026 8:04 PM EST up reply actions
good comparison to your future #1 pick ...
although I think it’s different. Trout & Brown both play outfield and are both athletic. They profile differently on offense but you’re still talking run producing (or run catalyst) outfielder.
With Purke (or Cole) vs. Rendon you’re talking run stopper or run producer. Eventually you’re looking at a Rendon/Alvarez as your 3-4 lineup combo or Taillon/Purke as your 1-2 pitching rotation. Either one looks very nice but I think it’s a drastically different choice than Trout vs. Brown (2 athletic outfielders).
by Rhombus67 on Feb 15, 2026 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
Rays fan opinion here.
Presently, the Rays top outfield prospects consist of Jennings, Sale, and Vettleson. In the majors, the Rays have Damon, Upton, Joyce, Zobrist, and Fuld. In 2012, the Rays outfield will probably be Zobrist/Jennings/Joyce. With this in mind, the Rays don’t have a huge need for either player. Joyce and Zobrist both are good defenders and have sticks and we all know Jennings. Don’t get me wrong that every system would love to have Trout/Jennings, but there just isn’t a big need.
With all this in mind, I would take Trout. The Rays could give him plenty of time in the minors.
by mr. maniac on Feb 14, 2026 7:23 PM EST reply actions
Hm
I think you have a bit too much faith in Joyce, RF seems like a glaring need w/ only Sale as a possibility.
by hybrid on Feb 15, 2026 8:22 AM EST up reply actions
In 575 major league PAs, Joyce has been worth 3.3 wins.
That means he’s been worth what Andrew McCutchen was to his team last year, but McCutchen had 78 additional PAs.
I think Joyce will be just fine.
by PissedMick on Feb 15, 2026 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
I take Trout
I like dynamic players and Trout is the definition of that. Brown may hit 30 HR in the bigs but Trout could be a 15+-15-40+-40+(HR-3B-SB-2B) type of player and play pretty good defense in CF.
by DominicanDandy on Feb 14, 2026 7:58 PM EST reply actions
Trout.
Brown is closer to the majors but he’s older then Trout and still needs work before he’s replacing Werth in Philly.
Trout is younger and if he is as good as his upside is, the Angels will be happier in the long run then the Phillies. That doesn’t mean they both aren’t studs though.
"Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9 Number 9"
by Gelatin on Feb 14, 2026 10:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Brown
I voted for DB. He’s performed well at a much higher level. I believe in him.
I like Mike Trout a lot. I just want to see him thrive at higher levels before gushing on him. Abusing Class A pitchers is not the toughest thing to do.
"Most overrated prospect in the minors." -- Bravesin07 on Madison Bumgarner
by criminal type on Feb 14, 2026 10:42 PM EST reply actions
No, but ...
… I wonder if Harper Hysteria is getting just a little out of hand these days. The top prospect in the minors is a kid who hasn’t even played in the minors? I find that odd.
I hope, for his sake, that he ends up being really good. The expectations are insane.
"Most overrated prospect in the minors." -- Bravesin07 on Madison Bumgarner
by criminal type on Feb 15, 2026 8:31 AM EST up reply actions
i was just pointing out that your argument for why brown > trout
could be used as justification for kila over harper. I dont think having brown over trout is indefensible, even though i disagree, i just dont think you gave any legitimate reasoning.
Harper has proven more than any 18 year old prospect ever. He more than doubled the previous HR record in a good JUCO league while hitting with a wood bat in what shouldve been his junior year in HS. He was very good in instructs and he was awesome in the AFL. Add all this to the otherworldly scouting reports and its totally reasonable to have Harper as the number 1 prospect.
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 15, 2026 5:56 PM EST up reply actions
I like Trout, but if he can't develope 20 HR pop he is Johnny Damon at best
Damon is a good all around player except he can’t throw, hmmm Trout can’t either apparently to scouts. Brown has Superstar upside, and has a great great work ethic.
by Bravesin07 on Feb 14, 2026 10:49 PM EST reply actions
oh no a borderline HOF
disaster.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Feb 14, 2026 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
+1
If everybody likes you, then either no one knows anything about you, or you're dead.
Fantasy Prospect Central: http://fantasyprospectcentral.blogspot.com/
by Archie A on Feb 15, 2026 1:48 AM EST up reply actions
Damon's been consistently good for a very long time...
but he’s never been a star. He’s got three years where he’s finished above 4 WAR. His best year, 4.4 WAR in 1999, was the 50th best total in baseball that year.
by PissedMick on Feb 15, 2026 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
yeah i know
but it’s still a damn good outcome, doncha think?
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Feb 15, 2026 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think the comp extends to longevity or consistency, which are the two most important aspects of Damon's value.
Still, you’re right, he’s not a bad player at all.
by PissedMick on Feb 15, 2026 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
if im the angels and thats what trout turns into, im ecstatic
thats almost 15 WAR in the team controlled years…
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 15, 2026 5:57 PM EST up reply actions
lol this is funny
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on Feb 15, 2026 1:23 AM EST up reply actions
ive seem trout throw
he doesnt look like a girl like damon does. trout will be 20 hr hitter, no doubt in my mind
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on Feb 15, 2026 1:24 AM EST up reply actions
you probably said the same thing about Brandon Wood.
The Preamble to the United States Constitution is 52 words. The preamble (emphasis on amble) to Al’s first question was 59 words. That seems about right. -Andy @ disipio
by e-gus on Feb 15, 2026 2:07 AM EST up reply actions
As a Braves fan
I want Brown, just so that the Phillies don’t have him.
I hate the Phillies so much...
by frozendesert on Feb 15, 2026 12:46 AM EST reply actions
funny context
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Feb 15, 2026 1:14 AM EST up reply actions
I voted Brown.
I love Trout, but I’ve seen this kind of hysteria over guys who have performed well in the low-minors too many times. Trout was great at Cedar Rapids, and scouts love him. He was also just okay in the California League. Still, people are projecting him to be great across the board in the majors (maybe even this year!), and I think that’s a bit premature.
Brown’s a guy who also oozes tools, and just got done annihilating AA and AAA. He’s a bit older, but he was also a raw player that took some time to learn the game. Since it clicked for him in 2009, he’s moved across four levels while hitting something like .300/.380/.540. He’s an above-average player in the bigs at 23, and has a ceiling about as high as a corner outfielder’s can get.
I don’t have a problem with anybody preferring Trout. I just see a lot of people here who haven’t learned caution when it comes to prospects in the low minors. Chances are that Trout will be a very good player. Brown’s chances of getting there are just better.
by PissedMick on Feb 15, 2026 12:56 PM EST reply actions
Trout
By a long shot. The Cubs are lacking in superstar caliber prospects, and he’s the most superstar-iest of them all. Plus, his arrival time isn’t an issue since the Cubs are finishing no better than fourth place this season.
by sep484 on Feb 15, 2026 3:31 PM EST reply actions
They are both physical specimen. Trout is faster and probably stronger
Brown is taller and leaner. Brown will hit for power because he plays in a crazy HR park. 30 HR in Philly tuns into 20 in LA. SO I think power is going to end up being equal. So it all comes down to defense and age. Both give Trout the advantage.
It’s not close, and that’s not to say Brown is bad at all. He’s going to be very good. I’m predicting .285/.350 30 DB 8 triples 25 HR 20 SB and good defense. I can see Trout turning into .300/.400 40 DB 15 triples 20 HR 40 SB with great defense.
"You play for Cleveland? I didn't know they still had a team." - Claire Holloway
"Yup, we've got uniforms and everything, it's really great!" - Jake Taylor
by Halowood on Feb 15, 2026 5:51 PM EST reply actions
so....you think that Trout hits around 10 more homers/year than brown?
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 15, 2026 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
No I think Brown hits probably 5 more HR a year than Trout, only because of the ball park he plays in
Read it. Like I said, power is equal, but I take Trout’s speed, defense, younger age and higher ceiling. Brown’s going to be a very good ball player, but since the Angels already have three terrific OF in Hunter, Bourjos and Wells, Trout’s the better option, not only because he’s the better player but because he can afford to wait another year or two, he’s only 19.
"You play for Cleveland? I didn't know they still had a team." - Claire Holloway
"Yup, we've got uniforms and everything, it's really great!" - Jake Taylor
by Halowood on Feb 17, 2026 9:07 PM EST up reply actions
What can I say
I’m a Rays fan. I’d love to have a guy like Brown ready to make an impact.
by joaker5 on Feb 15, 2026 9:14 PM EST reply actions

by John Sickels on 











