Not a Rookie: Carlos Villanueva
Carlos Villanueva was signed by the Giants as an undrafted free agent out of the Dominican Republic in 2002. He made his pro debut with the AZL Giants that year at age 18, posting an 0.59 ERA and a 23/3 K/BB ratio in 30.1 innings. His command was obviously outstanding, but his mediocre stuff kept him off most prospect lists, including mine, pending higher level data. I would have given him a Grade C.
Villanueva returned to the Arizona Rookie League in 2003 and became a starter, going 3-6, 3.97 with a 67/13 K/BB in 59 innings with 64 hits allowed. Again the strong K/BB stood out, but as a league-repeater he needed to prove out at higher levels to move past Grade C.
The Giants traded him to the Brewers in March, 2004. Milwaukee sent him to Beloit in the Midwest League where he had a solid season in the rotation, making 21 starts with a 3.77 ERA and a 113/30 K/BB in 115 innings. HIs only negative stat was 20 homers allowed. By this time he'd boosted his velocity a bit into the 88-92 range. I gave him a Grade C+ in the 2005 book, pointing him out as a sleeper if he could get the home run tendency under control.
The Brewers sent him to the Florida State League to begin 2005. He did great, posting a 2.32 ERA in 21 starts with a 124/32 K/BB in 112 innings. A late promotion to Double-A resulted in a 7.40 ERA in four starts with a 14/9 K/BB in 21 innings with 21 hits allowed. His fastball was back to the 87-88 range at the end of the year, and scouts indicated that Double-A hitters weren't as easily fooled by his arsenal, granted the sample was small. I lowered him to Grade C in the '06 book, noting however that he deserved more chances and that he still had some sleeper potential.
Villanueva opened 2006 in Double-A and pitched well; he continued pitching well in Triple-A, then ended the season with 53.2 strong innings for the Brewers. Last year he pitched 114 innings for Milwaukee with a 3.94 ERA. In 168 career innings entering 2008, Villanueva has a 138/64 K/BB with 144 hits allowed and a 3.86 ERA.
What does the future hold?
PECOTA seems to hate him, giving him a collapse rate of 60% entering 2008. His comparables list includes scary comps like Todd Van Poppel and Ken Cloude, but also a few more successful guys like Mudcat Grant and Moe Drabowsky. Although in the rotation right now, my personal belief is that he is best utilized in the long relief/spot starter role, and that as a full-time starter he would be more likely to get overexposed and fail.
Villanueva is a Grade C/C+ prospect made good, and I tend to root for guys like this. If he stays healthy I think he will have a mixture of good and bad seasons, the kind of guy who will post a 6.00 ERA in a bad year, drift to another team, then turn things around quickly and post a 3.00 mark in a limited role, before being overexposed and struggling again. In the end I think Villanueva balances out as an average major league pitcher overall, but that's not an insult, and he gives hope to every guy in Double-A who has average stuff and is looking for a break.
0 recs |
3
comments
Comments
Agreed....
on your future assessment of him. I too think he would be best used as a spot starter/long reliever. I drafted him last season in my sim league because he had great numbers, and he simmed well for me. But I traded him this past offseason because I felt the league may catch up to him a bit and his flyball tendencies wouldn’t play well long term in my home ballpark. But I got a good haul for him. Traded he and Franklyn Gutierrez for Garko and Zumaya :)
"My mom always taught me it's better to laugh at yourself than to laugh at others. She was so wrong. ;)" -Pedrophile
by Boxkutter on Apr 17, 2025 1:41 PM EDT 0 recs
Agreed
I took Villaneuva in a couple of leagues this year hoping for a repeat of his solid numbers from last year, but was also cautious that over exposure could lead to problems. I’ve since dropped him, because until he’s back in a long relief role, I don’t think he’ll perform well. I haven’t checked the numbers, but I wonder if he struggles the second time thru the lineup-that could explain the success last year in short stints but the troubles this year. I do think he could be an effective long man/swingman for quite a while, or maybe a solid back end starter in a home park where the FB’s would be limited.
"You're a terrible ballplayer, but you've always been a great asshole."-salb918 on Ozzie Guillen
by gatling on
Apr 18, 2025 11:41 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Well, he's one of the Brewers' five best starters right now
So his “best role” is pretty irrelevant.
He's extremely quick and good.
by battlekow on Apr 18, 2025 5:47 PM EDT 0 recs



