Not a Rookie: Troy Tulowitzki
Not a Rookie: Troy Tulowitzki
One of my favorite current young players is Troy Tulowitzki. We've never done a retrospective on him, so there is no time like the present.
Tulowitzki was drafted in the first round in 2005, seventh overall, out of Long Beach State University. He was very successful in college, hitting .349/.431/.599 as a junior (in a difficult-for-college hitting environment) and the Rockies had no hesitation in drafting him despite an injury-plagued campaign. A broken hamate kept him to 39 NCAA games that spring, and a torn quad limited him to just 22 games as a pro, where he hit .266/.343/.457 in 22 games for Modesto in the California League. He drew very positive reviews for his defense as well as his bat, and I gave him a Grade B+ in the 2006 book, writing that he would likely advance very rapidly. I ranked him at 26th on my Top 50 Hitting Prospect list.
Moved up to Double-A Tulsa for 2006, Tulowitzki hit .291/.370/.473 in 104 games, with 34 doubles, 13 homers, 46 walks, and 71 strikeouts in 423 at-bats. Some scouts questioned his defensive range, but as I wrote in the '07 book, "it looks OK" to me. He got a cup-of-coffee in Colorado to end the season and struggled, hitting .240/.318/.292 in 25 games, 96 at-bats. In the '07 book, I wrote that it would be a good idea for him to spend some time in Triple-A, and that he currently projected as a .260/.330/.430 hitter in a neutral park. But I also wrote that his ultimate upside was as a .300/.380/.500 hitter, with strong defense. I gave him a Grade A-, ranking him as the Number Four offensive prospect in baseball.
The Rockies didn't listen to me about Triple-A and it was a good thing they didn't: he was their regular shortstop in 2007 and hit .291/.359/.479 with 24 homers, finishing second in Rookie of the Year voting behind Ryan Braun. An injury-plagued '08 season resulted in a much weaker .263/.332/.401 line, but last year he rebounded fully and had a stellar campaign: .297/.377/.552, 134 OPS+. His defense is excellent. It is true that Colorado boosts his numbers somewhat, but even if you ignore his home park he hit .267/.352/.507 on the road last year. Combine that with his glovework and you have a helluva player. He was 5.4 WAR as a rookie and 5.4 WAR last year; his injury season resulted in a 0.9 WAR, but it is clear how good he is when healthy.
Looking at comparable players, Sim Scores brings up the following names: Ernie Banks, Gary Carter, Earl Williams, Juan Uribe, Vern Stephens, Derek Jeter, Wil Cordero, Tony Lazerri, Yogi Berra, and Glenn Wright. There are four current Hall of Famers on that list and one future one, although oddly enough two of them are catchers. PECOTA comps are all over the map but are still interesting: Mark Carreon, Joe Cronin, Fernando Tatis, Dick McAuliffe, Keith Miller, David Justice, Travis Fryman, Ryne Sandberg, Oscar Gamble, and Eric Chavez are the top ten. Cal Ripken checks in at 15, with Jeter at 19, Barry Larkin at 20, and Ernie Banks at 23.
The presence of so many Hall of Famers on Tulowitzki's comp lists shows us what kind of ceiling he has. It doesn't mean he'll get there: there are several journeymen comps, too, and some guys who were just pretty good. Whether he reaches his ultimate ceiling or not will depend on factors like health and durability.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Braun v Tulo
Has this question ever been conclusively answered? Phenomenal offense with decent defense from a power position. Or great offense with great defense from a defensive position.
As long as Braun isn’t at the hot corner, I still choose the Cocky Cali Kid from the U.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
by ILuvDaBush on Apr 6, 2026 1:19 PM EDT reply actions
Its settled and its Tulo
Phenomenal offense with decent defense from a power position
Are we talking about the same Ryan Braun who plays for the Brew Crew? He’s nowhere close to a “decent defender.” He’s a butcher in the OF. Career -17.7 UZR.
WAR
Braun
2007: 3.2
2008: 4.0
2009: 4.8
Tulo
2007: 5.4
2008: 0.9 (injured and disappointing in only 377 ABs)
2009: 5.4
I just did this in another thread a couple weeks back. Braun was co-rookie of the year with Dustin Pedroia and Pedroia has been more valuable in every season of their careers. Tulo is significantly better.
And these WAR numbers are using UZR - which has Tulo as a negative defender in 2 of his 3 seasons. I think UZR is wrong on this guy, too. Dewan had him +34 from 2006-2008. Dewan and UZR don’t agree terribly often and people need to stop treating it like gospel. It took forever for people to accept defensive metrics had any value… now they’ve taken it too far in the other direction in some ways. Think of it as a range centered on a number rather than a number we can really nail down.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Apr 6, 2026 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Tulo...
is probably one of my three favorite current players. Outstanding defense at SS to go along with really good offensive numbers. I would choose him over almost any player to build a team around because of those things, his leadership, and the fact that he is still young. If there wasn’t an Albert Pujols, he would probably win a few MVP awards.
by joegonzo on Apr 6, 2026 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions
As usual bold proclamations and certitude
UZR is wrong about who you like but right about the one you don’t.
You use WAR as a definer of value - that’s foolish.
Braun is actually pretty good in the outfield.
It’s far from settled.
by JetSam on Apr 6, 2026 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, UZR is far from a science.
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
by Frederick0220 on Apr 6, 2026 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Mostly because most people don't know how to use it.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Apr 6, 2026 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I would say many people are just accepting it now rather than understanding how it is calculated
and arent aware of its limitations. IMO its the best out there… but it has problems with odd shaped fields and extreme park factors.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Apr 7, 2026 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
If you've actually watched Braun much in the outfield, I don't see how you can see he's pretty good
Every fly ball he catches looks like his first.
I don’t see how he’s any better than average, and even that is a stretch.
www.zekeishungry.com
by thejd44 on Apr 6, 2026 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions
I tried
To answer the question here
I think you overrate Brauns D. It is flat out awful. He has the tools to improve it, but I will want to see results before banking on it. As a side note, if you look at some of the players he gets compared to in history, who were awful defensively, he comes nowhere near so far when it comes to WAR.
I think its a toss up. I would take the middle infielder with Tulowitzki’s defense and offense over Braun any day of the week, as would most of the people who responded to my post. My point was that Brewer fans and old fashioned stat heads would choose Braun, and saber slanted people would choose Tulo.
Also, dont forget that the years that Braun has hit over .300 he also had a very high BABIP those years. And the year he was under, his BABIP was average. Also working in Tulos favor, at worst he moves to 3B as he moves on in his career, Braun could move to CF but only if he dramatically improves defensively.
by backtocali on Apr 7, 2026 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions
by John Sickels on 





