New York Mets Top 20 Prospects for 2010
Top 20 New York Mets Prospects for 2010
All grades are EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY and subject to change. Don't get too worried about exact rankings at this point, especially once you get beyond the Top 10. Grade C+/C guys are pretty interchangeable depending on what you want to emphasize. Complete reports on these and over 1,000 other players will be in the 2010 Baseball Prospect Book, now available for pre-order, shipping on February 2nd!
1) Jenrry Mejia, RHP, Grade B+: He needs to refine his breaking ball and a full year of Double-A/Triple-A is necessary in my view, but he also has number one starter potential. I hope they don't rush him.
2) Wilmer Flores, SS, Grade B+: Considering the age/competition differential, he had a pretty good year. Hard to get a handle on him sabermetrically as a result, but I'll give him some slack.
3) Fernando Martinez, OF, Grade B+: People are now too negative on him. The guy was the equivalent of a college sophomore last year. If a college sophomore got drafted and hit .290/.337/.540 in Triple-A, people would be drooling over him. He's made significant progress refining his tools. My main concern now is health and durability, which keeps him from ranking higher.
4) Ike Davis, 1B, Grade B: Showed he could hit for power, also has a fine glove. But I think he looks more like a solid regular than a future star.
5) Jon Niese, LHP, Grade B: Assuming the hamstring is OK, I see him as a slightly above average starting pitcher, classic number three guy.
6) Reese Havens, SS, Grade B-: He'll need to switch positions, and health is an issue. Has power and draws walks, and I think the batting average will come up if he stays healthy.
7) Kyle Allen, RHP, Grade B-: Significantly underrated prospect who deserves more attention than he's received. Breakout candidate for '10. I expect this ranking will surprise people.
8) Jeurys Familia, RHP, Grade B-: Like his teammate Allen at Savannah, Familia could break through big in '10. This is another ranking I expect will surprise people.
9) Brad Holt, RHP, Grade C+: I don't like the way he fell apart in Double-A, but the arm strength still deserves respect. Perhaps he might do better in relief.
10) Ruben Tejada, INF, Grade C+: At worst a fine utility guy, but given his youth (age 20) and contact hitting ability he could get beyond that. I like him as a sleeper for long-term success.
11) Kirk Nieuwenhuis, OF, Grade C+: The strikeouts scare me a little, but he has a broad range of skills.
12) Eric Niesen, LHP, Grade C+: You have to love the velocity and movement on his pitches, but command still holds him back.
13) Jefry Marte, 3B, Grade C+: Didn't handle the rush job as well as Flores did, but he's too young to give up on. Plate discipline a big problem.
14) Cesar Puello, OF, Grade C: Excellent tools, showed speed and power potential in the Appy League but weak plate discipline worries me. Could rank much higher next year if he handles more advanced pitching.
15) Josh Thole, C, Grade C: He can hit for average, but has no power and defense is mediocre. Sounds like a bench guy to me.
16) Juan Urbina, LHP, Grade C: He was born a week after I got my master's degree. I'm getting really freaking old. Has the raw potential to rank higher than this but let's see him pitch first.
17) Steve Matz, LHP, Grade C: I think cold-weather high school pitchers are often underrated in comparison to their warm weather counterparts. We'll see if Matz fits that profile.
18) Brent Rustich, RHP, Grade C: If he can stay healthy, he could help in the Mets pen sooner than expected.
19) Tobi Stoner, RHP, Grade C: Could contribute in '10 as fifth starter/long relief type.
20) Dillon Gee, RHP, Grade C: Like Stoner, he can contribute this year, assuming his shoulder rehab has gone well.
OTHERS: (Grade C): Eric Beaulac, RHP; Shawn Bowman, 3B; Robert Carson, LHP; Zach Dotson, LHP; Lucas Duda, 1B; Clint Everts, RHP; Carlos Guzman, OF; Zach Lutz, 3B; Roy Merritt, LHP; Scott Moviel, RHP; Sean Ratliff, OF; Aderlin Rodriguez, 3B; Armando Rodriguez, RHP; Nick Santomauro, OF; Josh Satin, UT: Scott Shaw, RHP; Josh Stinson, RHP; Robbie Shields, SS; Nelfi Zapata, C.
Most of those Grade C guys could slot in the 14-20 spots depending on what you emphasize. I am rushed for time on the book and didn't spend hours and hours worrying about the 14-20 Grade C ranks, so please bear with me.
First I want to clarify something I wrote earlier about propaganda and groupthink surrounding the Mets system. Everyone is vulnerable to the lure of crowd opinion. . .even people who regard themselves as independent observers still absorb biases, or conversely, they fight so hard against other people's biases that they go too far in the other direction. This is especially true for any organization which has a substantial media presence surrounding it and a motivated fanbase. It cuts both ways: a run-of-the-mill Grade C prospect can easily get overhyped, but at the same time a guy who is really an excellent prospect can fall victim to unrealistic expectations. Fernando Martinez, as I point out above, is absolutely still an elite prospect, yet people are disappointed in him through no fault of his own.
Part of the problem with analyzing the Mets is the weird way they have handled prospects. Some guys, particularly the Latin American signees, have been rushed way too fast, while others have been handled very cautiously. I'd be a lot more confident in sabermetrically analyzing Wilmer Flores if he'd been playing in the New York-Penn League for example. However, you write your baseball book with the data you have, not the data you wish you had.
On the pitching side, the Mets have something potentially special in Jenrry Mejia, although they really need to be careful about how they handle him in '10. His secondary stuff still needs work, and I think they are asking for trouble if they rush him. Niese is ready now, and while he's not spectacular I think he will have a good career. Holt and Niesen have upside but need to sharpen their command. There are other Grade C types who can help as utility pitchers soon, but I'm very intrigued by the pitching the Mets have gathered in A-ball. Allen and Familia look like breakout candidates to me and I'm going to rank them aggressively. Lefties Matz and Urbina provide some long-distance projection.
On the hitting side, Martinez can still be a star, but he's got to stay healthy. I think 400 Triple-A at-bats would do him a world of good. Flores' numbers in the Sally League aren't great, but he was the youngest guy in the circuit and we have to cut him some slack for that. Ike Davis should be a solid hitter, while Tejada, Havens and Nieuwenhuis can at least be contributors and maybe more. Thole is one of the guys I think is overhyped. Marte and Puelo have potential but are too raw to rank higher at this stage.
Overall, I think the Mets system is stronger at the top than a lot of people think, but at the same time they could use more depth in Grade C+/B- types. Some of the Cs have the potential to improve greatly.
1 recs |
157 comments
|
Comments
Nice write up
I would only say that I would like to see Kirk as a B- otherwise, can’t say I disagree with much during this quick glance.
Follow me at http://twitter.com/JDSussman
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JDSussman on Jan 8, 2026 1:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Gotta
say I think this list is very fair. If I could change anything I agree that Kirk is underrated at C+, I think he is more of a B-, I agree with JDSussman and I think Thole belongs in front of Puello and Marte (though I am high on Puello)
by Peter North on Jan 8, 2026 2:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
hahaahaha AWESOME job John Sickles !!!!
Yes
Dewey Finn is gonna love the Thole ranking !!!!
and it is probably spot on !!!
I'd rather have Nick Punto playing 3B and Felipe Lopez playing 2B
than Punto playing 2B and Kouzy, Crede, DeRosa or Glaus playing 3B.
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jan 8, 2026 2:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
i'd give him a C+
i don’t like how the “no power” thing is getting thrown around like he’s a Gathright esque slap hitter either. he’s had ISO’s of about .100 in pitcher friendly leagues the past two years, not a disaster. i don’t love him but i think he does get underrated a little bit. i’ll give his defense another year or two to catch up also…last year was only #2 for him catching…I think.
he’s better than the prototypical “C” grade prospect. IMO.
baseball rules.
by doublestix on Jan 8, 2026 2:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
I’m not sure where C ends and C+ begins, but looking at last year I’m surprised how many were C+. I think likely too many, and maybe part of why John is railing against Mets “hype”:
Marte, Mejia, Parnell, Kunz, Evans, Davis, Gee, Moviel, Shaw, Beaulac, Tejada, Veloz
Obviously Mejia and Davis have proved better than C+. Gee and Moviel both might arguably still be C+ if not for injury setbacks. Parnell was pretty much as expected (solid in the pen anyway), but Kunz and Veloz at least were clearly over hyped. And maybe Shaw. Beaulac probably drops a bit just from his inability to sustain good velocity (that was probably hyped as well, I think I remember Parnell comps somewhere?).
Where Thole is now, I’d expect his value to be behind what at least the first half dozen of those guys was perceived to be a year ago, but I doubt he’d be behind the last 4 or 5. Maybe that’s where the C+ cutoff should have been though.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 9:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Flores was ahead of F-Mart on BA's list, too.
Makes no sense to me.
.877 OPS in AAA at age 20 with the potential to be a serviceable CF.
Flores’ OPS in low-A at 17: .637
Martinez’s OPS in low-A at 17: .880
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
by Frederick0220 on Jan 8, 2026 3:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
agree with this
almost mentioned it in my other post. would definitely have martinez ahead of flores.
baseball rules.
by doublestix on Jan 8, 2026 3:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree that F-mart should probably be higher, I'm pretty much indifferent to that
but I don’t think there’s much chance he sticks at CF, I think it’s much more likely he’ll end up in a corner, which makes his .877 OPS less impressive.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 3:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also Sickels said his main concern was health
Which I think is a pretty reasonable knock against F-mart, he hasn’t made it through a full season yet with some sort of injury causing him to miss significant time.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 3:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That does make some sense.
Even if he’s a LF, his floor is still pretty high.
Flores is a complete wild card; all he has going for him is a 2-month span of success in rookie ball.
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
by Frederick0220 on Jan 8, 2026 3:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, what I've read about him
is that he’s very slow, poor range defensively, and at this point, all his power comes from his wrists which I guess would mean as he fills out and improves his swing, he can be a 30+ home run guy.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 8:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
From what I’ve read, Flores is very clearly not a middle infielder, and he is slow as molasses, but according to a number of observers the bat is quite special, even if it hasn’t completely shown up in the stat line yet. And those reports come from 2 years of American observers, so they are much more reliable than those sometimes mythical-seeming reports that come out of the Dominican during the IFA season.
I think it highly inaccurate to say that all we have on him is a two month stat line, though I do think John is a bit bullish here (as a did last year as well).
by aCone419 on Jan 8, 2026 12:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree
To me, Fernando is still the Mets best prospect on talent and upside alone. His problem is staying healthy, but I’d have him at number one on my list.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 5:25 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you can make a fair case for Mejia over him though.
I really can’t see Flores being ranked above him…he’s being pushed aggressively, but he didn’t really tear up the sally league and there’s no way he sticks at short. I think he’s more of a C+/B- type at this point. By the same token, I think Holt is ranked a little low. I’d look at him as more of a B/B- type, and I’d probably put him ahead of Havens at this point. All in all a great list, and I love the Allen and Familia notes. I’d love to see a guy like Dotson take Stoner’s spot though, as Tobi (besides a cool jersey) will probably never amount to much in the majors while Dotson has some very interesting stuff. Clint Everts is an interesting guy as well.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
really surprised with a lot of these
overrated
martinez- yeah he did well at AAA but remember sample size, even with the success he had, he has shown poor b/kk skills that need a lot of improvement.
flores- i would have thought he would have been a C+, maybe you could argue B-. he’s a corner guy with no power, poor plate discipline and subpar results albeit at a level higher than where he should have been. there are so many guys in the B to C+ range i would take over him
underrated
davis- i would have thought b+ but your grade isnt far off. i guess i disagree with the guys you have ahead of him. yeah he likely wont be a star, but he is a lot safer than a guy like flores and unlike flores, the power and plate discipline skills are alreay there. flores has to hit for power or he is worthless considering how he projects as a average at best defensively and below average baserunner.
holt- the guy dominated in A+. i think he deserves some slack for not adjusting to AA right away.
do love the kyle allen placement. i think he is a good one. one of the few pitchers i like in this system. mets system usually has a lot of raw boom or bust guys. i dont think the higher ceiling tool guys are there but most of the guys have higher floors. an okay system, better than the past.
by bravitos5122 on Jan 8, 2026 3:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think part of what hurts Holt is the fact he's 23
So while you can cut him some slack of not adjusting right away, he doesn’t really have a lot of time to get it right/develop his secondary stuff more.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 4:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Holt's ranking is fair
as long as its specified that he could pretty much jump way up with a strong campaign in the first half of this year. He still does have the potential to be a #2 esque starter.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jan 8, 2026 8:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
I think there’s a good chance lack of command might make him more a #4. But one of those guys who might have #2 stuff if he ever put it all together.
I don’t see the bullpen move though. I think he has 2 solid secondary pitches now, and an ability to pitch deep into games, it’s just a matter of being able to command and locate. I don’t see the command improving that much in the pen, maybe he could go fastball only there, but how good is he going to be then? Might as well have him struggle some with command and still maybe be a #4 type SP rather than move him.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 9:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More than anything I'm surprised he's a grade behind Familia and Allen
Who I think are excellent prospects, but neither really dominated and its LowA. I don’t expect them to get exposed in the upper levels, but its always something to watch for. And its not so much that you expect Holt to move to the bullpen, but its almost an automatic path to the majors for him if for whatever reason he doesn’t last as a starter.
If it were me, I’d have it the other way around, but I suppose I see what John’s saying.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 9:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Familia
Yes, in my mind Holt is what you hope Familia has a chance to be in a couple of years. On the other hand, Familia is 3 years younger, and arguably not all that far off from that, so you could debate it either way.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 10:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Familia's not missing nearly as many bats as Holt though
He has a better second pitch, but his fastball isn’t on par with Holt’s, and it requires a lot of projection to assume he’ll strike out more than a batter per inning as he moves up the ladder.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1 on Flores
A B+? Seriously? John usually is a lot more conservative ranking the low level toolsy guys. This ranking surprised me much more than any of the others. I have no problem with F Mart as a B+, but Flores pretty much shocked me.
by guru4u on Jan 8, 2026 10:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Though I do agree the grade is a bit bullish.
Flores supposedly has a pretty good feel for hitting and working the count etc. So I don’t think it is entirely correct to compare him to the all-tools-no-polish guys that John typical holds off on.
by aCone419 on Jan 8, 2026 12:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't mean to be too negative on John here
But if he made a mistake last year in giving Flores too high of a grade, it doesn’t mean he should make the same mistake this year as well.
I pretty much agree with what you are saying aCone. The B+ grade on Flores shocked me last year just as much as it shocks me this year. I just don’t see him as being THAT good with the bat. The D, by all accounts, is mediocre at best, so his bat will really have to carry him. And the bat is all projection at this point.
by guru4u on Jan 8, 2026 12:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
2 MASSIVE BRAIN FARTS ON DAVIS & THOLE!
Ike Davis deserves atleast a B+. He has demonstrated excellent power, above average defense, a good walk rate, and the ability to hit for a solid average. He’s certainly capable of being more than just a ‘solid regular’. He’s got the potential to be Adrian Gonzalez.
As for Thole, I would accept a B grade. Power isn’t everything. Josh Thole will never hit 20 HR, however, hitting around 10 HR, with a .320+ avg, and solid defense makes him a pretty valuable player. As much as people might believe I overrate Thole, he is severely under appreciated. You gave him a C??? Disappointing John.
JOSH THOLE > carlos santana
by Dewey Finn on Jan 8, 2026 3:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
If he learns to play solid defense, I'd agree with you completely.
He really isn’t at that point yet, and while he could hold his own at the plate in the majors, he’s just not there defensively yet. If that comes around, I could see a much more agressive ranking, but a C/C+ is probably about fair for him now.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 9:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Josh Thole's career
has a floor of Robinzo Diaz and a ceiling of Jose Morales. I think Thole is good, C+ish, but nothing like what you are saying. Also, his defense is not solid, at least not yet.
Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson
by gore51 on Jan 8, 2026 11:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you realize how hard it is to hit .320 in majors?
by Manstein on Jan 8, 2026 4:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This.
Dewey Finn is Josh Thole’s niece.
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
by Frederick0220 on Jan 8, 2026 5:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At best Thole gets a C+
but no way he comes near a B.
I'd rather have Nick Punto playing 3B and Felipe Lopez playing 2B
than Punto playing 2B and Kouzy, Crede, DeRosa or Glaus playing 3B.
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jan 8, 2026 7:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No way a C, though.
I mean, he’s almost a sure bet to be a backup, if nothing else.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
by squid92 on Jan 8, 2026 8:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well not if he can't handle the position defensively
most catching back ups are defensive specialists.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 9:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think a backup/fringe starting catcher would be a fair expectation for a guy with a C grade.
In Tholes case if you buy into his defense, you’ll see him as a good prospect. If you don’t he won’t have much value. It really depends what John thinks of his defensive abilities.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
That’s why Thole is not getting enough respect.
He’s capable of an average anywhere from .300 to .340 yearly, .320 being the average season.
JOSH THOLE > carlos santana
by Dewey Finn on Jan 8, 2026 6:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Doing that at AA and doing that at the ML level are two completely different things.
As of right now that’s his only plus tool, so it makes sense to see how that tool translates at AAA before saying he’ll be competing for batting titles at the major league level.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 6:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond
by hero66 on Jan 8, 2026 7:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll believe in Thole
When he improves his defense, drastically improves his HR:PA ratio from 1:500 he had last year and hits for high average in AAA. Until than he’s a C+ at best.
by Manstein on Jan 9, 2026 7:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
.340?
I am willing to wager anything that Josh Thole will not-
A. Ever hit .340 in a season he gets over 400 PAs
B. Finishes with a career BA of .320
Seriously, you need to get a clue. Trust me.
by bl on Jan 9, 2026 8:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you are a parody of yourself at this point
by RedSoxFaithful on Jan 10, 2026 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is an upside of Adrian Gonzalez a B+?
The three B+’s all seem to have considerably higher upside than that. 2009 was Gonzalez’s first stellar year. Even if you want to debate how much Flores’s bust potential hurts him, his upside is still considerably higher. And yes, Miguel Cabrera is considerably better than Adrian Gonzalez. Same with Fernando. A plus defensive corner outfield with good contact skills, crazy power (higher power upside than Davis), and decent speed? Upside much higher than Adrian Gonzalez. And I don’t think I need to talk about Mejia’s upside. I also think these upsides are much more likely outcomes for the three B+ guys than Adrian Gonazalez for Davis.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 5:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
bananas
JOSH THOLE > carlos santana
by Dewey Finn on Jan 8, 2026 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Career 133 wRC+
You have to be kidding…
Follow me at http://twitter.com/JDSussman
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JDSussman on Jan 8, 2026 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Miguel Cabrera
141. He also had a three year head start, and has been worth 5 WAR or more in four separate seasons.
Here’s their wRC+ by age starting with first full season:
Gonzalez
24: 129
25: 127
26: 135
27: 158
Cabrera:
21: 133
22: 151
23: 156
24: 146
25: 131
26: 138
Cabrera’s had a considerably better career so far. I’m not saying Gonzalez isn’t elite, in terms of upside, Fernando, Flores, and Mejia all have higher ceilings.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 6:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
last one should be 148 for miggy
Anyway, point is, an upside if Adrian Gonzalez, absolute best possible outcome, isn’t THAT awesome, its very good, but a bit less than that is just a slightly above average player. I wouldn’t be surprised if Davis turned into a perennial 2-3.5 WAR first baseman, and you could make a case he’s more likely to do that than any Mets prospect, but his ceiling just isn’t that crazy high. Mejia has #1 SP potential, the classic comp for Flores’ upside is Cabrera, and Fernando is tough to comp, but he may have more raw power right now than Davis, and he’s much younger.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 6:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah that makes sense
I think part of the argument here is that 133 wRC+ has less value at 1B. So 2009 for example was A. Gonzalez’s only season over +4 WAR.
If we think a LH Carlos Lee is a comp for Fernando, that’s as valuable a player. Except Carlos Lee at the same age was in low A ball putting up a .772 OPS with an even worse walk rate than Fernando had in AAA this year. So you could argue Fernando has a fair chance to be as good or better.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 6:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How likely is a guy to turn into Cabrera?
Davis may not be likely to turn into Adrian Gonzalez, but can you really look at a kid at 18 and say, just because he’s similar to Cabrera at that age, that he has a good chance to be that good?
I agree those three probably have higher ceilings, but basing it on a Miguel Cabrera comp seems just as much a reach as projecting Ike to be Adrian Gonzalez.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 6:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly what I'm saying
That the two are similar types of reaches, and represent something similar to the absolute best possible outcomes. Not saying I at all expect it unless development is virtually as positive as possible.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 6:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
still debateable
You still could argue in a best possible outcomes scenario that Davis has as much power potential as anyone. If you are quoting Miggy comps for Flores, you can quote the guys at scouting book who were projecting 40 HR power for Davis.
I don’t think the issue with Davis is his best possible ceiling, it’s his likelihood of reaching it, as at the moment he strikes out too much and usually has more of a line drive stroke. So the issue is he’s maybe still more likely to be closer to Overbay than Gonzalez.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 7:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess thats true
But even still, he doesn’t have one skill that really jumps out and screams elite, and he does have the one very big weakness that seems bound to show itself more next year. I’m not totally sold on his power, I have a feeling NYSEG was just really kind to his swing, but I could be wrong thats just a gut guess. I see it more as 25-35 HR power at best, but again, I may be being conservative.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 7:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wasn't talking about Cabrera
You stated:
Fernando: A plus defensive corner outfield with good contact skills, crazy power (higher power upside than Davis), and decent speed? Upside much higher than Adrian Gonzalez.
My reply was meant to read: Projecting someone to have Hall of fame upside is moronic.
Follow me at http://twitter.com/JDSussman
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JDSussman on Jan 9, 2026 6:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
is Adrian Gonzales a HOFamer?
Until last year he had been a solid regular but not an all-world player or anything.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 9, 2026 7:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
...but his recent production is HOFer level
6.3 WAR in 2009. Thats ridiculous from a 1B.
Seems like this is just semantics.
by alskor on Jan 10, 2026 2:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's one season
Lets him do it twice before we start calling him a Hall of Famer. It’s entirely possible last season was an aberration for Gonzalez.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 10, 2026 7:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thinking that Adrian Gonzalez is a Hall of Famer is moronic.
And no, upside is just that- his “all things break the right way” projection. You need to get a clue.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
by squid92 on Jan 9, 2026 11:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's one definition of upside
Its hardly the only, and I would wager 75% of the people on this site would define it differently.
For instance, when I see “upside” Im inclined to think “reasonable optimistic projection.” If we’re talking absolutely everything breaks right I think of that as a “perfect world projection.” Maybe its just me.
by alskor on Jan 10, 2026 2:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I personally don’t see a difference between “perfect world projection” and “upside.” For instance, when KG lists the former in his writeups, I don’t take that to mean something beyond “upside.”
by aCone419 on Jan 11, 2026 12:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would say that's an absolute ceiling projection
upside isn’t necessarily the best possible scenario but more like best case and most likely scenario.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 10, 2026 3:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
right
we’d be talking about 50+ players with hall of fame upside otherwise. because there is probably around a 1/10 of a percent chance that any random top 50 player could make the hall.
we are talking about around 20% likelihood in most cases (that gets higher as players get older). to say someone has an upside much higher than adrian gonzalez, you are saying that player has around a 20% chance to be a hall of famer (much better than a-gone = HOF). that would be a bold statement for even Heyward.
by auclairkeithbc on Jan 10, 2026 10:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well I disagree with the last part
Last year Adrian Gonzales put up HOF worthy numbers but most of his career hasn’t been anything near that. Most of his career he’s been more just above average but not really a star.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 10, 2026 10:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I never said Adrian Gonzalez was a hall of famer
Wow. Please read.
He said:
Upside much higher than Adrian Gonzalez.
A Career wRC+ of 133 (which is where AGon is) is HoF territory. Much higher than 130 would probably mean 143. Which is an EASY hall of famer.
And I didn’t call you a moron. I like your work at AA. But again, the point that Fernando Martinez has an upside much higher than Adrian Gonzalez is moronic. I’ve said moronic things in my life, that doesn’t make me a moron.
Follow me at http://twitter.com/JDSussman
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JDSussman on Jan 11, 2026 4:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Someone has to have hall of fame upside
Or else we wouldn’t have any hall of famers
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 10, 2026 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And also
I was replying to the comment that Ike Davis’s upside was Adrian Gonzalez, which is the reference scale I was using in making that claim. Ike Davis is to Adrian Gonzalez what Fernando Martinez is to someone better than Adrian Gonzalez.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 10, 2026 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And one more
wtf is with calling people morons? Why do so many commentors on this site feel the need to belittle other perfectly reasonable claims? You clearly didn’t read the whole conversation. I’m not asserting any degree of likelihood that Fernando becomes a better player than Davis, my argument was that Fernando has more upside than IKE DAVIS, who someone else had compared to Gonzalez. I don’t think its that ridiculous to suggest Fernando’s upside is better than a 133 career wRC, its not likely, but he could certainly be that and more with his hitting ability. And like Cabrera, he’s going to break into the majors at a much younger age than Gonzalez.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 10, 2026 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I suggest following adjustments in your book before printing....
Jenrry Mejia A-
Ike Davis A- or B+
Josh Thole B or B-
Fernando Martinez B
Wilmer Florez B
Brad Holt B
Kirk Nieuwenhuis B
Trust me, it makes sense.
JOSH THOLE > carlos santana
by Dewey Finn on Jan 8, 2026 4:01 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm a Mets homer, but thats crazy
I think Thole is definitely a C+/B-, Holt is B/B- and I gree that Davis is a better prospect than Flores
by viktor06 on Jan 8, 2026 6:20 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, I just saw your signature
That is the dumbest thing I’ve ever read on this site.
by aCone419 on Jan 8, 2026 8:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree
I hope he’s right, but Santana does everything better on offense, has infinitely more power, and while I know nothing of his defense, Thole is passable at best.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 8:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Trust me, it makes sense.
Quick question for the community. Does it make more sense, or less sense than Dewey’s signature?
Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson
by gore51 on Jan 8, 2026 11:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
More
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 11:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Emperor Dewey Finn, please
You’re going to catch a cold without your clothes.
by mrkupe on Jan 8, 2026 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes... Thole is a better prospect than Martinez and Flores
by Navi's_Navy on Jan 8, 2026 12:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sarcasm?
Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson
by gore51 on Jan 8, 2026 12:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ike
Ike’s grade is spot on . . . . he is a longer swing and until he shows he can hit a breaking ball, he has to be at a B.
by gunkdog on Jan 8, 2026 1:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
eh.
I don’t think that’s totally fair. He’s proven quite a bit, and one thing that people keep forgetting is his purported excellent defense.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
by squid92 on Jan 8, 2026 2:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I haven no problem with Davis at B
I think “solid regular rather than future star” describes Davis pretty well. He’d be a B+ if he was a plus defensive corner outfielder with that bat. And I don’t think his defense grades out that awesomely, above average sure, but an above average defensive first baseman with a .360-.380 wOBA isn’t a superstar. Its a solid player, but not a superstar.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 3:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Which is why in my fantasy future
Bay will be at first base and Ike Davis will be providing average defense in rf.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 4:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What makes you think you gain value that way though?
If Bay is -5 OF and Davis is +5 1B, you’d still have to get the sum to 0 or better if you want to get value out of switching them them. If Davis is 0 in the outfield, Bay has to be 0 or better at 1B or you’re losing value. I mean, give or take a defensive run is nit picking and its definitely worth considering if you can leverage it better with your pitching staff, but Bay could be just as bad at first as in the outfield, which would hurt a lot more than it helps.
Besides, I’ve got Fernando in my fantasy future RF providing above average defense :).
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 4:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well I assume F-mart will be in left field
And because I expect Bay to be worse than -5 in the of. And in my fantasy world Bay is an average first basemen.
This is random and totally unrelated to anything in this post but it occurred to me while I was typing this, do you have any idea how Beltran projects to decline the few years after his contract expires.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hard to tell
What gets him first? Natural decline or his bad knees?
by Lunkwill Fook on Jan 8, 2026 6:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Job
This is probably the best Mets ranking I’ve seen this year. I think you are right about the hype going both ways. You are never as bad as they say when you are losing and you are never as good as they say when you are winning. The media just magnifies the over reactions in both directions. As awful a year as the Mets had, they are actually seeing too much negativity lately, including with regard to the farm.
Ike Davis is a good example of both the positive and negative reactions. People loved him at draft time, hated him when he didn’t hit last year, and now think he’s a star. I think you can make a good case for a B+ there, but there are still flaws (I’m always cautious about high k rates). So why not give him the B for now and make him earn it?
Holt is another example. I actually like him better than I did a year ago, I think he’s made good progress. But a year ago when there were people arguing for him here in the community top 100 list here, I thought it was premature. Now though, when healthy, I think he’s a solid B. He dominated in the FSL, probably the best pitching prospect in that league after Drabek and Mejia. Then he struggled in his first AA start, and then dominated for the next 9 starts before an ankle injury. The last two months were ugly, and then he didn’t attend instructional league, which certainly makes me wonder. But my first suspicion is he was never 100% after that injury. I think it’s worth docking him for that second half meltdown, to B-, but I think you may be the one over reacting with the C+.
Thole, I mostly agree on. I don’t think he belongs higher than 12. Yes, some get over exited by the numbers, and some do underestimate how raw the defense still is. He probably needs a year to work on the defense in AAA before settling into an offensive bench role. But, the kid can hit. I think he’ll be a very valuable guy on a roster as a LH catcher with a bat. If you look at his last 1000 PA, counting majors, minors, AFL, and winter ball, he’s hit everywhere, cumulatively hitting over .320 with over a .400 OBP. That’s worth the C+.
Finally, I also like Nieuwenhuis higher, but seeing as he came out of nowhere, I can certainly see why you are giving him the C+ and saying make him earn it as well. But I personally like him right alongside Havens.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 4:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
What do you mean here?
Then he struggled in his first AA start, and then dominated for the next 9 starts before an ankle injury. The last two months were ugly, and then he didn’t attend instructional league, which certainly makes me wonder. But my first suspicion is he was never 100% after that injury.
His first AA start he gave up 2 earned, struck out 3 in 6.1 innings, in his second he gave up 5 in 0.1 innings, the 4 earned in 3.1, the he had a nice three game stretch where he stuck out 24 and gave up 5 runs in 18.2 innings, and then survived the rest of the way never striking out more than 4 in a game while giving up at least 5 earned in each one. He started 11 games in AA, gave up 9 homers, had a K/9 of 5.80 and a 5.55 FIP. Outside of that strong three game stretch, he never came close to dominating anything.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 5:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
My mistake
I must have been looking at A+ starts and not realized it.
Yeah, the ankle injury was right at the beginning of his AA stint then, after only 1 start. So he never dominated AA at all. So maybe more likely he just was not ready to handle AA. The C+ grade makes more sense then.
Somehow I was looking at game logs and thinking they were just for AA. Should have realized the dates made no sense.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 5:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You got me excited about Holt too. Damn you!
He still has next season to prove himself. If he goes out there and pitches in AA like he did in A+, that C+ won’t mean much.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 6:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was also his first full season in the minors, so I'd expect him to wear out to some extent.
I think you’ll see him do just fine this season, and if his secondary stuff never comes around he’s probably already developed enough to be a better reliever than Bobby Parnell.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 9:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Secondary stuff is already decent
His secondary stuff isn’t bad as far as quality. It will be at least as good as Maine’s I believe. What I doubt is whether he’ll have Maine’s command of it. Maine has pretty average secondary pitches, but gets good results with them because he locates them very well.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 9:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Command is part of quality
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on Jan 8, 2026 2:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He may have screwed up A+ stats vs AA stats, but its pretty clear that either he didn’t fully recover from that ankle injury, or he lost his groove when he came back from it, because he clearly wasn’t the same pitcher in the 2nd half that he was in the 1st half IMO. I think the change in leagues was coincidence more then anything else. I think dropping him to C+ is a little ridiculous when chances are you’re evaluating a stint where he was at less then his best. Chances are he’ll come back and handle AA hitting well enough in his second go-around, and his stock will rebound then, but it’ll be because he’s healthy that time around more then anything else.
by adropofvenom on Jan 8, 2026 11:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
It’s less obvious, but you can still make an argument that the injury had an effect. But that’s just one possibility, the other being that his command of the secondary stuff is still somewhat spotty and it’s not surprising he struggled at that level. And it would be questionable if they would let him pitch if his ankle wasn’t right, as that would also risk causing arm injury. So that’s a lot to assume.
But, there’s still pretty good projection there for a guy who sustains 90-94 deep into games and shows two quality secondary offerings. It takes time to really learn to command a breaking ball and change up. And hitters in AA will hit them if the location is poor in the zone.
A prospect ranking is still about projection though, and Holt’s still looks solid. I don’t see the front of rotation guy some are wishing for, but I also don’t see much space between him and Niese. Niese is more polished, but Holt is likely to be at least near as good, and still has a higher ceiling if things go right. I think you could have a pretty good debate right now over which guy is likely to have the better career.
And then you have a guy like Familia who might end up with a similar fastball, but for now has even less in the way of secondary pitches. If Niese is a B, and Familia a B-, then Holt is at least a B-. Familia’s SO and BB rates in low A weren’t much different from Holt’s in AA. Holt will adjust to that level, the stuff is there.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great list here john
I’m surprised Niesen is so high after not being on your original preliminary list. If he gets command, he can be a deadly left hander.
Couple of changes I’d like to see, but not too upset about would be:
1) Davis to B+, he dominated AA last season, hits for power, a good average, takes his walks, good glove, just needs to cut back on the strikeouts. At this point, the only question mark on him last season was the strikeouts. I think right now he’s on par with Yonder Alonso who was a B+ last year.
2) Tejada to B-, played the whole season at 19, the youngest player in the league, is supposed to be very good fielder, has good speed (stole 19 out of 22 bases), doesn’t strike out (only 12.1% K%) has a decent eye for someone so young (7% BB%), and for a player written off with no power, he hit 5 homers and has plenty of time to add strength. Would 10 home runs be out of the question next season? He had very comparable numbers to Starlin Castro, not he’s as good or has as much potential, but just that they had comparable seasons, both at age 19 (though Castro is a few months younger)
3) Thole to C+, A catcher who hits over .300, walks more than he struck out in A, A+ and AA, doesn’t hit homers, but still has doubles power, and only in his second year behind the plate and is adequate.
4) Nieuwenhuis to B-, Played most of the season at 21, was the best hitter in the FSL last season, led the league with .383 wOBA and .824 OPS, third in homers with 16, first in doubles with 35, stole 16 of 20 bases, had a high K% (28.1%), but waked a decent amount as well (11.1%) and he’s a solid fielder.
I may be a bit of a homer, but I really like where the farm was this year and think there are a bunch of guys who could potentially breakout next season and become top prospects. Havens, Allen, Familia, Nieuwenhuis, Tejada, Holt at the more advance levels, and Puello, Urbina, Marte, and Matz, at A or below. (Just to be clear, not that all will become top prospects, just think one or two of those groups could have monster years)
Fernando and Niese will probably graduate this year, perhaps along with Stoner and Gee, but the Mets should get some help with the seventh pick in the draft next season.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 6:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I would agree with all of these changes.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jan 8, 2026 8:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I have a feeling Martinez will actually play a full season in AAA.
Bay and Francoeur (unfortunate) are entrenched in the corners, and if Beltran stays healthy he’s fairly well established in center. Pagan would likely be the first to replace any of them, and I think even Omar would like to see F! play a full season in AAA. I really hope he tears it up and pushes the front office to get rid of Francoeur at some point.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 9:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Francoeur will play his way out by the end of the year
I really don’t want to see Fernando in the majors this year anyway unless he’s hitting like .330/.410/.590 through Mid July and hasn’t had any injuries
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 11:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Or Omar will extend Frenchy 5 years
and trade F-mart for a of he’ll later trade for someone as equally as crappy as Frenchy.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 8, 2026 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on Tejada
For all the reasons posted above. He seems to have a floor of a decent utility guy that can play SS and seems to have a very good chance of realizing that. That profile seems like a B- to me given his age.
Having watched him play though, he’s a tiny guy. That may limit his ceiling.
by Guyute on Jan 8, 2026 10:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he's a guy who if everything goes right will never be a 5 tool player.
He’s already a plus defender with a good arm and good speed. He already has a decent eye at the plate, but if he can get his BB% to around 10% while maintaining his K% he’ll be a very safe bet to be at least a decent hitter (albeit with very little power). That has real value in the majors, and I think the floor there is pretty high. Those are the types of complimentary players that large market teams really need to keep producing.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 10:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What he said, although I will concede that you overranked Flores.
by adropofvenom on Jan 8, 2026 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Niesen
I reviewed some video of Niesen and was very impressed with him.
I can see Tejada at a B-.
by John Sickels on Jan 8, 2026 12:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Does Thole even have doubles power?
My understanding was that he hit a ton of grounders that just happened to find holes this year. …Yep, a 55% GB rate and just a 12% LD rate, but he was able to hit over .300 because of a .360 BABIP. Had an .ISO below 100. A guy who has such limited power and hits so many grounders won’t be pitched around in the majors, limiting the one positive — his walks.
Dude is also bad defensively.
He’s the Ian Desmond of catchers.
"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond
by hero66 on Jan 8, 2026 7:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The one bright side about Thole's power potential
Its grasping at straws a bit, but its strange that his best power year came in the FSL. You’d think that he’d have built on that in Double-A, but he didn’t, he regressed. Its possible that his approach played better in the FSL for some reason, and he doesn’t have the traditional pull hitter profile that plays well at NYSEG. It probably doesn’t mean anything, but its still curious.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 7:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His stance and approach looks very similar to Adam Kennedy IMO
"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond
by hero66 on Jan 8, 2026 8:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember reading an interview where he talked about how he changed his approach
Because he was struggling early in ABs but was getting a lot of hits by shortening up with two strikes, so he started shortening up for all pitches. He may stick with that indefinitely, but again, that was when he was in the FSL and hitting in a park and league that really suppresses power. He was also dealing with making adjustments to the positional conversion, which he still is. There are only so many adjustments a player can make at once, but perhaps when/if he plateaus in terms of his defensive ability, he’ll have filled out a bit more, have a bit more raw strength, and can start experimenting a bit more with his offensive approach. I’m not saying its likely, but its the one decent argument I can think of for trying to make Thole’s lack of power not seem like such a huge long-term weakness.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 9, 2026 11:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
heard the same thing
about the shortened up, 2 strike approach. and watching him w/ the mets, you could definitely see it where he’d shorten up and whip a ball right through the hole. but you could also tell that as long as he hits that way there will be little power to speak of.
IMO he probably sticks w/ this style until he establishes himself and since so much of it is seemingly based on his psychological approach, once he feels confident that he can maintain a .300 AVG then he starts to loosen the reigns and swing harder. as you noted, he showed some power in the FSL so it’s definitely in there but if he can’t maintain his same rate of discipline and AVG (or at least acceptable levels) w/o using this style then that power may never be unleashed.
by robcast23 on Jan 9, 2026 10:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just a question to John and anyone who follows the minors closely
Where does the Mets system rank in your opinion? Is saying top 15 me being too optimistic about my favorite team, or is a 13, 14 or 15 ranking fair? I pretty much follow the Mets entire farm and the top prospects of other clubs. I’m don’t go too in depth after the top few prospects.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 6:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jim Callis says 24
I think that’s way too low. I had been thinking 14-15, but I guess Holt’s stock has fallen more than I realized, and maybe there’s a couple less C+ guys than I expected. Something like 16-18 at minimum I could accept, but lower than that hardly makes sense. From my point of view, the system is in the best shape it’s been in a long time. Really, since about 2002 when they had Reyes, Wright, Kazmir, Heilman, Bay (briefly), Huber, Wigginton, Pagan, Jacobs, Heath Bell, Tyler Yates, Grant Roberts, Matt Peterson, Neal Musser, and Len DiNardo all in full season ball at the same time.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 8:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Callis said 24.
If I remember correctly he gave a list of teams in the 16-25 range and the Mets fell 2nd to last alphabetically. He didn’t want to give away the rankings before the book was released. My BA subscription expired though, so I have no way of double checking at this point.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 9:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was John Manuel
Callis in a chat recently actually said 24. His own personal rankings, not the official book.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 10:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotcha...like I said, I let my subscription run out.
BA relies to heavily on Adam Rubin for their Mets coverage for my taste. I don’t know what a beat writer that travels with the major league team is doing writing for them, I’d at least hope they’d find someone who occasionally travels to minor league games. They also seem to discount guys who actually perform too much in favor of guys with great tools. I’m finding more and more sources that do a much better job than them, and I really don’t think I’ll ever go back to subscribing.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 10:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Id say middle of the pack, maybe a bit below.
by alskor on Jan 8, 2026 11:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
The constant worry over the Mets system within the NY media is just way overblown. They have lots of talent here.
"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond
by hero66 on Jan 8, 2026 7:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Only in the AFL, which doesn't really count for much, as most teams best MI prospects are playing SS.
Murphy played there too in the AFL. Havens played SS all season in St. Lucie, and will likely do the same at Binghamton.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 10:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do we know that?
In my mind, the move to 2nd base in the AFL was a precursor to playing there on a semi-permanent basis in AA.
by Lunkwill Fook on Jan 8, 2026 10:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe sort of
I believe they indicated somewhere recently they want both Tejada and Havens to play some 2B next year. That may not mean they are moving either completely, but it’s pretty clear both will have more big league chances at 2B in the Mets organization.
I think the smart thing might be to hold Tejada back at AA another year, and play Tejada at SS, Havens at 2B, and then flip them for a spell as well.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 10:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Mets traditionally let their better prospects play the most demanding positions on the field that they can handle, and move them when they absolutely have to.
Havens by all accounts plays an adequate SS, although he will likely need to move by the time he reaches the majors. If they were going to have Tejada repeat AA I might be in agreement there, but I don’t see any reason not to let him move to Buffalo. He definitely played well enough in a full season of AA to warrant a promotion, and there really is nobody in AAA to take playing time from him (unless you’re a big Anderson Hernandez fan).
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 10:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good write up John
I agree with John about this list, though Ike Davis is probably a borderline B+ guy. If he has another solid season in the minors he will most likely be more than just a solid regular.
I like Josh Thole a lot too and I believe he can be a solid starter. That said, he looks very much like former Mets’ catcher Mark Johnson (remember him?).
I am most high on Ruben Tejada (for no apparent reason other than I like him a lot).
My 2c opinion a fair ranking for this improved system would be #14 overall.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
by feslenraster on Jan 8, 2026 8:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Merritt
Is his upside a LOOGY or a more prominent role?
by thebroman on Jan 8, 2026 8:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
loogy for sure
as a lefty sidewinder type, righties have no problem squaring him up while lefties have batted .196 against him in his minor league career
by robcast23 on Jan 8, 2026 10:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate loogies
I tend to not want a guy like that even on a roster. Which is why I didn’t really agree with Merritt on this list. Coultas or Carr have question marks, but profile as much more valuable pen arms in my opinion. Maybe it will take some time, but I’ll bet on the guy who can bring mid-90s heat with at least one decent secondary offering, thanks!
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 10:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody wants a LOOGY over a guy that can get hitters out on both sides.
The problem is that there just aren’t enough guys that can do that for every team to have 12-13 of them. At some point even a team with a 140 million dollar payroll has to find cheap guys that fill a role. A pitcher like that who can do one thing very well can be more valuable than a guy like Stoner or Gee who really don’t excel at anything.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 10:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
good point
a guy like merritt or adam bostick could absolutely be an effective major league LOOGY right now which w/ the rampant overuse of pedro feliciano the last few years definitely has serious value. i personally hope that pat misch gets a real shot to take this spot.
by robcast23 on Jan 9, 2026 10:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I would quibble on Thole.
He’s not a star, or even an average starter, but he actually is pretty valuable to a Mets team that currently has Omir Santos as its starting catcher.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jan 8, 2026 8:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
also
with the utter crap out there that passes for league average catching, thole will look fine if he can sustain his excellent on-base skills and improve his defense (which has already shown great strides).
by robcast23 on Jan 8, 2026 10:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The problem is that right now he is a one tool player.
This year we should get a good look to see how his defense comes along, but it really has to improve by a decent amount to be even worth having as a backup catcher. You have no idea how much I wish Omar had protected Jesus Flores.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
eh
immediately following that loss i felt that way too but 2 years later and flores still looks as raw and undisciplined as ever. i know he’s been hurt but i remember thinking at the time “man in 2-3 years he could be a really good player” and he really hasn’t progressed at all.
by robcast23 on Jan 9, 2026 10:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
nice list
I’d go B on Flores, Davis maybe B+, but B seems reasonable, B- Holt, C+ Thole, C on Marte. B- on Familia and Allen, well, I don’t want to disagree. But I figured they’d be C+s.
by wobatus on Jan 8, 2026 8:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Martinez
Its already been addressed but Martinez over Flores shouldn’t even be a question. Martinez is still the best prospect for the Mets, injury concerns or not, if I had to choose one guy out of the system I’d still take FMart. I like Mejia a lot and I wouldn’t argue much about placing him equal to Martinez. But I would drop Flores to a B, because Martinez and Mejia are clearly a step up from Flores IMO.
by GoldenSpikes24 on Jan 8, 2026 10:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Jefry Marte
I’m still optimistic on him. He had a monster year in 08 and a horrible year in 09, no doubt. Given his age, I’m willing to give him a pass. The skills that gave him rave reviews in 08 didn’t just disappear.
2010 will be a telling year.
by Guyute on Jan 8, 2026 11:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think most Mets fans are, but for the same reason we feel Flores is ranked to high we probably feel Marte is about right.
He has a nice bat, but he’s got a long way to go and probably won’t stick at third. He certainly has the tools to be a very good prospect (which he shows in flashes), but to move him up based just on his tools is probably unfair to the guys that have actually performed at the higher levels. He stills has a better chance of never reaching the majors than just about anybody on that list due to his age.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Schmidtxc on Jan 8, 2026 11:22 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ike Davis & Wilmer Flores
You definitely got Davis right, John. A nice guy to have in your system and somebody that you can project to fill a 1B/OF slot capably but not at a star-type level of production.
I’d definitely count myself among those surprised at how highly you think of Flores, though. I like the projection his bat shows, but it’s all projection at this point. And while I’m not going to harp on the production level of any teenager (especially a 17 year old) in the Sally League too much, it just wasn’t a very good year other than the fact he managed to make decent contact. For a guy who is probably very average with the glove long-term wherever he plays, he’s really going to need to hit, and right now he is a short-season wonder.
I will admit that I thought Flores was overrated last year as well.
by mrkupe on Jan 8, 2026 12:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
FMart comps/projections
I have FMart on my dynasty league because I’ve heard so much about him, but I honestly don’t know much about him. What do you all see as comps for him, and got any guesses for projections (both average and peak years)?
by rmarx on Jan 8, 2026 12:25 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I've heard JD Drew a bit if he learns to walk and can't stay healthy. Its tough to come up with a really accurate comp because his zone control and power are so divided right now. Not Jeff Francoeurish, he's better on both fronts than Francoeur was
at this point, but he needs to improve his discipline. His best tool right now is power, he really could be a monster power threat, but he needs to control the zone better. Walks and health are the two big things. His power is going to mean the opportunity to up his OBP is going to be there, but he has to learn to take advantage of it. I’d guess an average year for him, assuming a slightly optimistic path from here, is something like .290 / .340 / .500 and peak is something like .320 / .390 / .580. That’s the other point, despite his power, he also has surprisingly decent contact skills, enough of both where he could hit for a decent average pretty consistently. Decent speed and athleticism should also play pretty well on the basepaths and he should be an above average defender in a corner.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 1:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
average/peak year?
I could see the average year performance, although it might be a little overstated, need to see if he can maintain the power production or if it’s just a bit of noise at the moment.
That peak year projection is REALLY high, though.
I always thought of Martinez’s upside as the rich man’s Jose Guillen.
by mrkupe on Jan 8, 2026 6:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah your right I should have worded it better though
That’s his peak “ceiling”. Expected, maybe more like .310 / .380 / .530? Either way, point is, power is always going to be his best tool, contact skills are pretty decent, walks are yet to come, and health is a concern. Rich man’s Jose Guillen well undersells Fernando’s power potential I think. Not many 20 year olds can have 11% of the balls they hit in the air go for homers in Triple-A, even in just 190 PAs.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 6:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and I'll take issue again
If Fernando Martinez were expected to be a .900+ OPS hitter every year, having already reached AAA at the age of 20, he would be a consensus top 10 prospect even with the injury bug.
When you say you think his ability to make contact is “pretty decent” . . .you DO realize you just projected the guy to be a 70 hitter for average, don’t you? And Jose Guillen had excellent raw power in his prime, a solid 70 and maybe better . . .he also had terrible plate discipline that prevented him from using it fully.
More realistic “expected” projection: .275/.335/.495 (.830 OPS)
More realistic “peak” projection: .300/.355/.540 (.895 OPS)
That’s a pretty nice player. But his development could go down a lot of different paths given his youth and propensity for getting hurt. I’m just working with the stuff that we know and the stuff that we can realistically expect at this point. Perhaps I’ll be surprised.
by mrkupe on Jan 10, 2026 6:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't say I expected him to be a .900 OPS every year
I said a typical year would be more like .290/ .340 / .500, which is basically the same as what you said, just a bit more average heavy. And .310 / .380 / .530 is a .910 OPS, which is only .015 more than the one you put. Again, now you’re giving him more ISO credit than me, while I’m giving him a bit more of a BB% expectation, partly because if his ISO is .220 or higher, he’s going to draw some intentional walks.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 11, 2026 12:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
flores/martinez
I went back and forth between ranking Flores or Martinez at 2….ultimately I just made a decision and moved on. I’ve got a book to write. :)
Davis was almost a B+, but I didn’t like the way his swing looked in the Arizona Fall League…I could really see the “length” the scouts were talking about.
by John Sickels on Jan 8, 2026 12:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Question
Hi John, I just have a quick question. In regards to scouting, about how many of the players you write about did you see play in 2009? Thanks for these lists, as I am loving reading the discussions so far.
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 8, 2026 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
depends
depends. I saw almost every player on the rangers list, for example. I haven’t seen as many of the Mets guys. It depends on the organization.
If I havne’t seen a guy I do have sources I trust who have.
by John Sickels on Jan 8, 2026 7:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks John
I have another quick question. Do you prefer to watch a MLB or MiLB game in person? Which do you consider the better fan experience?
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift
by King Billy Royal on Jan 8, 2026 9:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1-5 I'm in total agreement
After that it gets a bit shaky. I could even stomach Havens at B-, but I think he’s a B. I agree that Holt’s Double-A struggles are troubling, but I also think he’s clearly a better prospect, by quite a bit, than any of the other guys ranked C+ here, and that its really tough to argue that he belongs below Familia and Allen. Those two are excellent prospects and they both have time on their side in a big way, but they have a long way to go before they’ll be able to consistently retire upper level hitters either, much longer than Holt. I agree with the relief thing on Holt, its possible he winds up there, but I don’t see this as a negative. Saying a SP prospect could wind up in the pen, at least with a guy like Holt, is basically the equivalent of saying they have a MLB caliber fastball, and that in short stints they could probably retire big league hitters in the very near future. I don’t see that as a built-in floor for Familia and Allen yet. Their upside is similar, #2 starter or something of the like, but they have a much longer way to go to get there and they don’t have the security of a relief gig if they can’t handle the upper levels.
I also think Thole is a much better prospect than any of the rest of the C group here, and his value much more closely resembles the C+ group. He’s older than Tejada and inferior defensively, but he’s a much better and similar type of hitter and plays an even tougher defensive position, one that he’s only had two full seasons to adjust to so far. Its not that he’s such a bad defender that he’ll have to move off the position, just that his ceiling is somewhat limited defensively by his lack of a real cannon arm. His actions behind the plate are improving at about the pace you’d expect a converted first baseman to, and he has the bat to be well above average for the position, and the skills to maintain his offensive production very consistently. I’ve heard left handed Paul Lo Duca as a possible comp, which at first made sense to me, then didn’t when I looked at his minors numbers, but the more I think about it, the more I think Thole could be that and a bit more.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 1:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thole
He constantly walks more than he ks, and has good obps and very high averages. Didnt he dominate the venezulan league too? Considering power is often the last skill to develop, and thole has clearly shown that he knows how to hit, i think a C+ would better represent his skillset and potential.
by jarjets89 on Jan 8, 2026 2:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You've clearly never seen Thole swing
He will not be developing power. He chokes up and throws his hands at the ball.
by aCone419 on Jan 8, 2026 10:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
but he’s VERY skilled at the plate, in terms of working the count as well as getting liners and making constant contact.
by METSMETSMETS on Jan 11, 2026 6:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Too high on Flores
In my opinion, and I guess many people’s. Maybe it’s just because he’s being pushed too far, and JOHN is the expert, not me, but I feel like SOME performance is necessary before he can be ranked so prestigeously.
Also, rather low on Holt, who fought a small injury and was adjusting to AA after being in Brooklyn and college for all of 2008.
Low on Thole as well. From what I’ve seen from Josh he’s a line drive hitter who can get hit off of just about anyone. I saw him live againts Rich Harden and Carlos Marmol and he ripped liners off of both, which is pretty impressive considering that they have some elite velocity and movement. For a regular catcher Thole should be above average, at least.
by METSMETSMETS on Jan 8, 2026 3:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm so glad that someone else likes Havens
He’s probably one of my favorite players in minors, not including A’s guys of course. Overall I think Mets system is better than people give them credit. For example, if I were Padres GM I could definitely see a more interesting match in Mets than in Mariners or maybe even Red Sox regarding potential Gonzalez trade.
by Manstein on Jan 8, 2026 4:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1, real big on Havens
Havens and Lutz are two guys from last years FSL squad who I’m hoping will tear out of the gate. Two guys who have fallen a bit behind because of injuries. Lutz was also quietly very solid in the FSL last year. He walks almost like Lucas Duda but he actually has some power.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 8, 2026 4:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
especially in how much I could exploit Minaya
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
by squid92 on Jan 8, 2026 8:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Matz...
more than I thought I did. Athletic windup, good size, pitches downhill…more to come.
by SenorGato on Jan 9, 2026 12:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Is everyone in agreement on the definitions here?
Such as a “B” prospect has x percent chance of making the majors as a y WAR players, and so on?
by SeanSchirmer on Jan 20, 2026 2:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs








