BA AZ Top 10
Not a whole lot here.... Schlereth is in DET as of yesterday and Parker is a goner until 2011.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/rankings/organization-top-10-prospects/2010/269226.html
TOP TEN PROSPECTS
1. Jarrod Parker, rhp
2. Bobby Borchering, 3b
3. A.J. Pollock, of
4. Brandon Allen, 1b
5. Daniel Schlereth, lhp
6. Chris Owings
7. Mike Belfiore, lhp
8. Marc Krauss, of
9. Ryan Wheeler, 1b
10. Collin Cowgill, of
BEST TOOLS
Best Hitter for Average A.J. Pollock
Best Power Hitter Bobby Borchering
Best Strike-Zone Discipline Ryan Wheeler
Fastest Baserunner Antonio Sepulveda
Best Athlete Keon Broxton
Best Fastball Jarrod Parker
Best Curveball Daniel Schlereth
Best Slider Jarrod Parker
Best Changeup Josh Collmenter
Best Control Bryan Augenstein
Best Defensive Catcher Rossmel Perez
Best Defensive Infielder Reynaldo Navarro
Best Infield Arm Pedro Ciriaco
Best Defensive Outfielder A.J. Pollock
Best Outfield Arm Jeremia Gomez
0 recs |
25 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Wow
Really good draft this year
You’re name has 2k9 in it — what are you some 8 year-old who makes Pillsbury Doughboy cookies and jerks off to that bullshit video game with Tim Lincecum on the cover--
Frederick0220
by Mets2k9 on Dec 9, 2025 11:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
eh, pollock at 3?
don’t like that ranking. not a surprise, considering how ba ranks, but i don’t like it.
by toonsterwu on Dec 9, 2025 11:39 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Top 10
It seems the subscription version has omitted Schlereth. Everyone moves up a spot and Davidson goes on at #10.
This is a weak system. I like some of the guys on here (Parker, Borchering, Owings, Wheeler, Krauss), but they’re ranked a lot higher than they would in an average system.
by jar75 on Dec 9, 2025 11:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like Pollock. I’d have probably #2, but yeah, this is a weak system.
by WrenFGun on Dec 9, 2025 12:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lots of interesting guys
That are a long way away from contributing.
I think Brandon Allen is a bit underrated. I can see him being a useful 1B.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 9, 2025 12:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What's the ceiling
on Collmenter and how is Cowgill recovering from his injury?
by BlueVol03 on Dec 9, 2025 2:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Davidson looks way too low at #10.
I would personally have him at #3.
He has light-tower power, has a sexy frame, and looks athletic, to boot,
Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.
by Frederick0220 on Dec 9, 2025 3:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
We're not selling blue jeans.
And I fail to see how he’s even close to being top 5 in this system. He’s got a long way to go.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
by Andy Seiler on Dec 9, 2025 7:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
If anyone described Davidson’s bat-to-ball ability as “disappointing”, it would be a gross exaggeration. And besides his raw power (which is significant), he doesn’t bring another tool that’s worth mentioning. A No. 10 ranking is generous, in my opinion.
http://www.examiner.com/x-28775-MLB-Draft-Examiner
twitter | jesseburkhart -- draft-related content only
AIM | jb02186
by jesse.burkhart on Dec 9, 2025 11:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
all of them are 2009 draft picks!
Check out my website, it has scouting reports for all the Orioles' top prospects and is updated daily. www.oriolesprospects.com
Follow me on twitter
by ravensfan3 on Dec 9, 2025 5:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Except for Parker...
And Allen…
And Schlereth…
"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond
by hero66 on Dec 9, 2025 6:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
think it was sarcasm
baseball rules.
by doublestix on Dec 9, 2025 10:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a good draft when your 5th rounder is #8 on this list.
It’s also a sign of a bad system. But I really think they hit on their picks this year. I want to see where Eric Smith is when their book comes out.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
by Andy Seiler on Dec 9, 2025 7:31 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Marc Krauss
Andy what do you think about Krauss - sounds like they think he could be fast tracked
by thebroman on Dec 9, 2025 9:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He can hit.
Not many people argue about that. I have to wonder if he’ll be useful at all on defense. He could be Adam Dunn-like on defense.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
by Andy Seiler on Dec 9, 2025 10:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Krauss doesn't get enough credit for his athleticism.
He was an all-state wide receiver in high school, and I’m not sure that he’s as slow of a runner as the scouting report leads one to believe (it says “below-average”, but he might actually be average or fringe-average). I think he has a chance to become a fringe-average defender in right field, and if that doesn’t work out for him, then an above-average defender in left.
http://www.examiner.com/x-28775-MLB-Draft-Examiner
twitter | jesseburkhart -- draft-related content only
AIM | jb02186
by jesse.burkhart on Dec 10, 2025 12:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan Wheeler
I’m wondering why Wheeler is so low. Based on the numbers it seems as though he outperformed krauss & pollock by a mile.
He’s a big kid with terrific plate discipline. What’s not to like?
I heard Tim Lincecum will win 1 Cy Young & 11 Tim Lincecums. Question is, how many Cole Hamels will he win?
by the pinstripes on Dec 9, 2025 8:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The track record.
He wasn’t incredible in college, and he’s got no secondary skills behind the bat.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
by Andy Seiler on Dec 9, 2025 10:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bat looks very impressive though
"Chicks dig the long ball, although fat chicks will settle for warning track power" - Nick Diamond
by hero66 on Dec 10, 2025 7:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The bat potential is impressive.
The current bat is not.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
by Andy Seiler on Dec 10, 2025 8:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it's not?
I know that you take a rather amateur-centric POV . . .but the guy had a .977 OPS in 232 college ABs this year and then had a higher OPS . . .in more pro ABs this year (263). He only turned 21 in July, so he’s pretty young too.
I mean, maybe it’s just me, but any guy who puts up 300 ABs of 1.000+ OPS performance has certainly earned the “impressive” label in my eyes.
by mrkupe on Dec 11, 2025 12:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
His eye is what made his bat impressive in pro ball.
He’s got good potential to be a good pro hitter, but you’ll see a good shift when he hits AA and AAA. Once there are pitchers that know how to pitch to him, his lack of refinement will come back to bite him. That’s not to say he won’t improve by then, but I’m just saying that crazy pro debut isn’t backed up by much of anything in the past besides a high BABIP and a good eye. That good eye will serve him well, but his current bat isn’t as good as his pro debut numbers suggest.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
by Andy Seiler on Dec 11, 2025 7:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Brandon Allen
So what’s the prediction for him now? He’s run the gamut on projections. Any comparisons left? Massive athlete with superb power and inconsistent bat who makes a good first impression but then gets too comfortable doing what’s least expected of him? And does anyone besides Bill James think he will approach double digit steals? I know he’s athletic (and I heard he was making some explosive contact in the AFL) which is why I’m so curious about his ceiling and expectations.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
by ILuvDaBush on Dec 9, 2025 10:30 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 







