Interview with Kansas City Royals General Manager Dayton Moore
I spoke with Kansas City Royals General Manager Dayton Moore on Sunday morning. Here is a transcript.
Interview with Dayton Moore
SICKELS: What is a typical day like for you during Spring Training?
MOORE: Well, Spring Training is obviously one of the most exciting times of the year. My typical day begins very early. I'll talk with Ned (Yost, Royals manager) and Bob (McClure, Royals pitching coach) first thing in the morning. We'll converse about the players and where they stand. Then most days I'll talk with J.J. (Picollo, Assistant GM for Scouting/Player Development) and Mike Arbuckle (Senior Advisor for Scouting and Player Development) to discuss any developments on their end, with scouting and the farm system. After that I'll talk with Dean Taylor (Assistant GM) and Jin Wong (Director-Baseball Administration). Seems like a lot of talking, but straight-line communication is the way we begin each day. Making sure we all know what is going on is crucial.
Once the spring training games begin, we have a meeting with Ned and the coaches every four or five days to discuss where the players stand. After every game, everyone in baseball operations will get together and talk about what they saw. We exchange opinions and observations, then I'll talk with Ned again, talk about what the scouts saw, what the player development people say, etc.
When the minor leaguers start playing their games, I will watch as many minor league games as I can, along with watching the major league game of course. So basically, Spring Training involves a lot of communicating, talking, and observing before we start making roster decisions.
SICKELS: As good as the farm system is, there is a lot of frustration among Royals fans that it hasn't translated into major league success yet. There is a lot of talk about "The Process." But fans don't seem to know what "The Process" means. How would you define it?
MOORE: We recognize that the fan base is frustrated. "The Process" means that we focus on scouting and player development.
Now, the thing is that the organization has been saying that for a long time, and the fans are tired of hearing it. We recognize that. We sympathize with that. I've tried to be honest about it.
When I got here, the farm system was almost empty, so we were starting from scratch. But even if you have a perfect draft, even if you are 100% right about a player, it can still take him three or four years to get to the majors, then another two to four years before he becomes a consistent performer. The 2007 through 2009 drafts have given us a really great farm system, and the early returns for 2010 look good too. But it takes time for that talent to flow to the majors. We want players to be reaching the majors in waves, two or three new guys per year, who have played together and know how to win together. And we are just starting to see the first results of that.
When Terry Ryan took over the Twins in 1994, it took them six or seven years to get to the point where they were consistently competitive. It doesn't happen overnight. But that is the model we have to follow to be competitive in Kansas City.
SICKELS: I think the fans understand that, but there is concern about how you make that transition from having a strong farm system to actually seeing the results in the majors.
MOORE: Of course. The other day I was looking at some notes I made during organizational meetings early in 2007. We decided then that by 2012 or 2013, we wanted the majority of our players to be home-grown, from the farm system. We wanted a young core in place by that time. We knew it would take at least five years for that to happen.
The first thing we had to do was get a leadership team in place, quality scouts and player development people. We wanted there to be some organizational stability, with quality people. That is something they have in Minnesota and Colorado and Atlanta. We have that now.
Another issue was morale. It isn't just the fan base, we had to turn morale in the organization around, too. We want players when they get drafted or signed with the Royals to feel like they are joining the best organization in the game. Everyone has to buy into it, coaches, players, development. It is hard to keep morale up when the major league team is losing. It affects everyone whether you like it or not. Baseball is a pass/fail system, but we refuse to just roll over because we are in Kansas City. Other teams in our situation have shown that you can succeed and we will too.
It is starting to happen now. We already have the second-youngest 40-man roster in baseball. Only Cleveland is younger. And that doesn't include players like Moose or Hosmer or most of the young pitchers not on the roster yet. We are finally at sea level and we can see the future ahead. In some ways, I feel like this is my first year on the job, and that the next one-to-three years we will take things to where they need to be.
I mentioned earlier that it can take a player three or four years before he's fully comfortable in the majors. Look at Billy Butler. He's been a really good hitter so far, but he's improved every year and we think he's about to take that to another level. That's why we gave him the contract extension last month. We believe he's a key part of that core we're building. That's the process.
SICKELS: Ok, let's get more specific. The Royals are universally considered to have the deepest farm system in the game right now. On the hitting side, you have Mike Moustakas, Eric Hosmer, and Wil Myers, all outstanding bats drafted out of high school. How difficult is it to project high school hitters? That is something I've had a lot of problems with personally.
MOORE: It is very difficult. It's hard enough for college hitters but even harder for high school hitters. The aluminum bat is a big factor, but the level of competition is an even bigger one. It is hard for hitters to develop beyond their level of competition. It is easier for pitchers to improve their game in some ways, a 90 MPH fastball is a 90 MPH fastball. But a hitter, he gets used to facing whatever pitchers he's facing, he gets grooved to facing that. You can't learn to hit against pitchers with plus velocity or great breaking stuff unless you see them.
SICKELS: So how do you do it? How do you project these hitters?
MOORE: You look at them in a physical way first, what physical tools they have. You look at their swing mechanics, how good their timing is, bat speed, how they position and use the legs. But even beyond that, and this is one thing we have really focused on, is their personality.
We are looking for players with a balanced personality. Calm, patient, poised. Strong character traits. This game will beat you up, and players need to have a strong support system and some mental, emotional security, in order to handle failure. Many of them haven't faced failure before and we have to get a feel for how they will handle it when they do fail, because at some point they will. Some hitters get into a bad habit of tinkering with their approach too much when they struggle. If there is a specific weakness, sure, but one of the things that hurts a hitter is a constantly changing approach, overreacting and panicking during a slump.
Just looking at our top two, both Moustakas and Hosmer have experienced failure, and they both showed they could handle it. That makes us very optimistic.
SICKELS: Anything else you look for?
MOORE: Lack of fear is a huge factor. They can't be afraid to hit with two strikes. We don't want a guy to be reckless, but he has to be able to hit without fear, too. You want a hitter who has both aggression and plate discipline.
SICKELS: Let's talk about some specific players. Mike Moustakas: can he stick at third base, and do you have any concerns about his ability to hit left-handed pitching?
MOORE: He can stick at third base, no question. He has the arm for it, and the body control. He makes backhand plays well, and his body positioning on slow rollers is improving. I don't worry about his glove. Hitting lefties will be a challenge. You don't see a lot of good left-handed pitching in the minors. Most lefties who command a breaking ball get to the majors quickly. Moose has some problems handling the ball away from him against left-handers, but he is recognizing the importance of that. He has short levers and that makes it easy for him to handle inside pitches. He's still working on the outside, but we think he'll get more competitive against them at least.
SICKELS: Eric Hosmer ?
MOORE: We have no worries about his bat at all. He handles the ball away naturally and has excellent command of the strike zone. He can play in a corner outfield spot but he has Gold Glove potential at first base. We'll have to see how things look when he's ready.
SICKELS: Kila Ka'aihue?
MOORE: Kila is a smart kid. He works hard. We think that what we saw in the last three weeks of the season from him is what he's capable of. We think he can hit .240-.260, hit 20-25 homers, .370 OBP. It will be a nice problem fitting all these guys in the lineup.
SICKELS: Does moving Wil Myers to the outfield boost his timetable for promotion?
MOORE: It might get him to the majors faster, but we'll see. He liked to catch. We think he could have handled it and become at least average, but the demands of the position could have hurt his bat, and that bat is special. He's a tremendous athlete, very strong, easy demeanor. He has that confidence I talked about earlier.
SICKELS: There's been some comment that his swing mechanics are unorthodox.
MOORE: His swing isn't typical, but I Iike it. He doesn't stay on his legs the way some hitters do, but it has worked so far. He may need to make some adjustments in Double-A, but we think he will do it. When we drafted him, there were three questions: what position does he play? How much money does he want? And his high school competition wasn't very good. A lot of teams discounted him for the draft because of that, but our scouts loved him and he did great when we brought him here for a stadium workout. The first two questions were answered and so far he's had no problems with pro competition.
SICKELS: Two players who had great years in Double-A were Johnny Giavotella and Clint Robinson. How do they fit in your plans?
MOORE: These guys had great years. Gio, he can hit, he gets on base, he plays tough, hard. We like the bat a lot. He's greatly improved at second base. He played outfield in high school and he could move back there if we need him, or maybe play some third base, but we're committed to him at second.
Clint gives us additional depth at first base and DH. He's a bigger guy and has holes, but the numbers were great. Both of these guys will move to Triple-A and they enhance our depth. You have to have depth to win a World Series, you have to have depth to handle injuries, you have to have depth to make trades. If all of our first base/DH players perform well there won't be room for everyone, but it is better to have too much than too little.
SICKELS: Can Christian Colon stick at shortstop?
MOORE: We believe he can stay at shortstop. He's very sure-handed, very good arm. His range and body control have improved between last fall and this spring. He's looked great so far in workouts and we feel good about his ability to stay at short. He can be an Orlando Cabrera type at short, or a Placido Polanco if he moves to second. Either way he keeps us strong up the middle.
SICKELS: Brett Eibner, he was a two-way player at Arkansas. How did you decide he was more of a hitter than a pitcher?
MOORE: Mitch Webster was on him from day one last year as a hitter. Mitch was talking up Eibner to us last February, he was totally convinced that this guy will hit. We see him as a center fielder with a good glove who will provide power. He strikes out a lot but we think the power will make up for that, and concentrating on hitting will help him blossom. Mitch really pushed him in the draft meetings. Brett is very smart, good family, very competitive. He'll strike out, but the ingredients are there, the intangibles plus the power.
SICKELS: As good as the hitting is, the pitching is also outstanding, especially lefthanders Mike Montgomery, John Lamb, Dan Duffy, and Chris Dwyer. And you have another group beyond them like Will Smith, Buddy Baumann, and Everett Teaford. Was gathering so many lefties something you did on purpose?
MOORE: Roy Clark taught me a long time ago that you have to be aggressive about acquiring left-handed pitching. We made a conscious effort to find lefties. We have the power arms, but the finesse guys are valuable too. But the four guys at the top have such upside. They all can be special. Duffy can throw his changeup at any point in the count and is very aggressive. Lamb has terrific fastball command. Montgomery's upside is huge.
So many of the best major league hitters are left-handed, that we have to have pitchers who can neutralize them. That means power arms but also guys who can command a breaking ball. Good lefties are one of the hardest things to find.
SICKELS: Tim Collins is an interesting acquisition.
MOORE: Mike Toomey (Special Assistant) really liked him. I had heard about him. We had been tracking his numbers for a couple of years. He has amazing velocity for his size, has a good curve, and a terrific changeup. I love the huge strikeout rate, and he gets the swing-and-miss on all three pitches.
SICKELS: There is the stereotype of the situational lefty, but I think his stuff is good enough that he doesn't have to be limited to that role.
MOORE: Yeah. Bobby Cox never liked the situational lefty thing. Ned is the same way. We want pitchers who can get anyone out, and Collins is like that.
SICKELS: You have all these lefties but less depth in right-handers. But the Greinke trade brought in a couple of good right-handers in Jake Odorizzi and Jeremy Jeffress from the Brewers. Where does Odorizzi start? Wilmington?
MOORE: Yeah, he's going to Wilmington. He could get to Double-A by the end of the year. The Brewers moved him slowly. We really like him, we liked him out of high school. Very athletic, very intelligent, great fastball command. Good feel for the changeup. He needs to settle on one breaking pitch, he uses both a curve and slider but we think he'll do better if he commits to one or the other.
SICKELS: Jeffress has a great arm but there are the inevitable makeup questions.
MOORE: Jeffress has had some problems, but you have to take a risk sometime and trust your support systems. He comes from a good family, he's a good kid. People in the fall league loved him. The arm strength is amazing and he can dominate with his fastball and curve. His command is inconsistent, but he has a real grip-and-rip mentality, attack mentality, that should fit well in the bullpen.
SICKELS: Finally, what do you think is the biggest weakness in the farm system?
MOORE: We need more speed and athleticism. My ideal team would have someone like Adam Jones or Torii Hunter up the middle, a guy who can provide speed, defense, and power. We'll have to see if Lorenzo Cain can be a player like that.
We need more right-handed power pitching in the system. We have all those lefties but we could use some balance.
We need more depth in catching.
You can never be satisfied, there is always a weakness somewhere. Even the best farm system is a fragile thing. Injuries can wipe you out fast.
We know we'll never win free agent bidding wars for catchers who can hit, middle-of-the-diamond players who can hit, and impact pitching. We'll have to develop those ourselves. In the end, we'll win with pitching. That's our focus.
104 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good Q&A;
You asked a lot of good questions & Dayton Moore was on top of just about everything. I know he takes something of a beating locally & from less than informed fans, but he is following that Minnesota-Colorado model to a tee & that’s the only sensible way to build in a market like Kansas City in a long term sense.
I thought that KC could have done better in terms of overall talent in the Zack Greinke trade, but all of the parts acquired do have some value. I still think Alcides Escobar is a fascinating young player & will be interested to see how he fares in KC.
by Matt0330 on Feb 28, 2026 10:00 AM EST reply actions
No, Dayton Moore takes a beating because of the free agents he signs
We are very well informed fans for the most part, and a lot of us have rather large doubts about whether Moore can fill in the holes from the farm system with quality free agents and trades. But this is a great interview, and if I keep hearing Moore saying such good things, maybe I’ll start to believe he can turn it around. It’s rather encouraging to see him talk about Kila’s OBP, when he has spent the last few years doing everything to deny Kila a shot at being an MLB regular.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
dont say that on a royals board....
people will insist that kilas been ready since 2008 when he really only earned his shot midway through last year….when he got it.
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
+1
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Feb 28, 2026 2:01 PM EST up reply actions
Moore was right again!
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
it's like the back of my hand
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Feb 28, 2026 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
Do we really want to rehash the pointless Mike Jacobs trade?
Kila could have done what Jacobs did, whether you believe he earned his shot at that point or not.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
Kila was ready in 2009 and had at least a potential future with the Royals
Jacobs was awful and had no future. Should have been DFA’d before the ASB.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 2:19 PM EST up reply actions
his numbers in AAA in 2009 were decent but not knocking down the door worthy
he definitely had some adjusting to do…and he did that in 2010 and got the last couple months of last year and will get at least a couple months this year to prove himself one way or another.
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
Given what the Royals had on their roster in 2009 and 2010
He should have been given most of both seasons as well as this one to prove himself. Getting a couple months last year and a couple this year isn’t nearly enough for a team this low on talent.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 3:29 PM EST up reply actions
And if Kila showed to you that he wasn't MLB-ready in 2009, does that mean you don't think Moustakas is MLB-ready?
In 2009, Kila hit .252/.392/.433 in AAA on the heels of his 2008 season in which he hit .316/.439/.640 in AAA and .314/.463/.624 in AA. In 2010, Moustakas hit .293/.314/.564 in AAA after hitting .347/.413/.687 earlier in the season in AA. So is Moose not yet MLB-ready? And what kind of stat line would Moose have to show you in AAA before you’d think he’s ready.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 3:35 PM EST up reply actions
no...i dont think Moose is ready now...
and Moose has much better scouting reports than kila did along with playing a position that requires significantly less offense. Also, Kila tore up AAA in late 2008 when much of the talent has been called up to the majors and then once 2009 started, his numbers decreased significantly. Moose struggled at the outset and then was back to his AA self. If I’m Moore, Im not calling Moose up in June unless he dominates the first couple months. Thats not what Moore will do though…Moose will be up.
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
He earned his shot by sometime (any time) in the 2009 season
His .392 OBP, even with decreased power, given what he’d done the prior season and his age meant that he should have moved up to KC and Jacobs should have been DFA’d. Leaving him in Omaha served no purpose.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 2:19 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed
Kila is completely overrated and will be exposed as a mediocre hitter in the majors.
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 28, 2026 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
You can be overrated and exposed as mediocre...
and still be a better option at 1B than Mike Jacobs.
I don’t give a crap what a player has or has not earned. Kila was the organization’s best option at 1B. He should have been playing there.
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 3:46 PM EST up reply actions
Did you consider that if Kila was in the majors it may have retarded his development?
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 28, 2026 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
In 2009, he was a 25 year old who had performed well at both the AA and AAA levels. It’s not like it would have been rushing some 20 year old kid. Sure seems like he was ready, wouldn’t have been rushed and could have used the development and extended look at the major league level.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
He wasn't even ready for AAA in 2009
He took some walks but his average was poor and he slugged only .433 while striking out with regularity. I don’t see the harm in the Royals keeping him down till he was 100% ready. No point wasting cost controlled years on a player who won’t perform.
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 28, 2026 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
I chalk up 2009 to the extreme disappointment of Kila being sent back to AAA
when there were expectations that he’d be on the MLB team since Gload was gone. That trade for Jacobs was pretty much Dayton Moore kneeing Kila in the groin and telling him to go ride the bus for another year. He’s been in the minors since 2002. It had to hurt a little.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
He was in the minors since 2002 because he often takes 2 years to adjust to levels
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 28, 2026 4:56 PM EST up reply actions
Or just the fact that players sometimes have down years
And, of course, that .392 OBP was still pretty spectacular. That is, if OBP is important. I guess some in this thread don’t really get OBP.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
obp is important....
but so is slugging and slugging 433 in the PCL as a 1b isnt impressive
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 6:20 PM EST up reply actions
Hitting well is important
And a .368 wOBA is hitting well, even in the PCL. It’s very similar to the .370 wOBA Moustakas had last year in Omaha. They got there from different directions, but with similar overall results. At age 25, given what he’d done at AA and AAA, I think he was ready. It was time to move him to the next level and let him grow as a player, rather than stagnate.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
so, you think they shouldve called moose up last year as well?
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 6:49 PM EST up reply actions
No, for several reasons
Among other things, I think it would have been rushing Moustakas, as he had less minor league experience than Kila and was only 21. Kila on the other hand, had more minor league experience and was 25 in 2009. And Kila had performed well at the AA and AAA level for a longer period than Moustakas (I would have called Kila up sometime in June 2009).
The standard for determining when a player is MLB-ready can’t just be dominance. If you only call up the minor leaguers who have dominated AAA, you wouldn’t promote many prospects. Kila had performed well, both in 2008 and 2009. And he was getting kind of long in the tooth for a prospect. It was time. Keeping him in the minors served no good end. And then he spent most of the next season (2010) in the minors as well.
Calling Kila up in 2009 and giving him most of that season and all of 2010 as a regular would have given the Royals valuable information. If he failed, then they would know that they can’t count on him and should keep Hosmer at 1B. If he succeeded, they could move Hosmer to the OF earlier, giving him valuable time to learn the position and hopefully become decent defensively. If Kila performs well this year, the Royals will be in a quandry. Do they gamble that this one season is the real deal and hurriedly move Hosmer to the OF, where he’d probably have one season to learn the position? Or do they try to trade someone? Knowing sooner would have given the Royals more and better options.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 7:15 PM EST up reply actions
It's ridiculous to say that he wasn't ready for AAA in 2009
Think a .392 OBP is a good? With that on top of his 2008, he was major league ready. Not necessarily ready to be great in the majors. But ready to take the next step in his development. Given his age, the Royals didn’t and don’t need to worry too much about when his cost controlled years start. He was wasted in the minors while the Royals wasted minor league at bats on Jacobs.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
His plate discipline was ready
Too bad his ability to hit for average and power weren’t.
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 28, 2026 10:42 PM EST up reply actions
He takes a beating from less than informed fans?
Please. Have you seen the major league players he’s acquired? Have you seen the lineups he’s constructed? Should he take a beating for the kinds of contracts he’s given out to Jose Guillen, Willie Bloomquist, Ross Gload, Kyle Farnsworth and Horacio Ramirez? Should he take a beating for trading for Betancourt and Jacobs?
Dayton Moore takes a beating for the bad job he’s done as Royals General Manager. Assembling a great farm system is a wonderfful achievement. But it might take you halfway to building a playoff team. And he’s shown that he doesn’t have the skills necessary to take the team the other half of the way. That’s why he takes a beating. Now, am I off base and “less than informed”?
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 1:46 PM EST up reply actions
Out of context
I wasn’t implying that all KC Royals &/or baseball fans were less than informed. Read that again. There are all sorts of fans out there & a mere cursory glance at just about any comments section/message board would show that though.
If the Royals’ farm system bears significant fruit (so to speak) in the next handful of years, I think that head scratching moves like the contract given to Jeff Francouer et al will be less of an issue because they will be construed as even more ancillary then they likely are now.
by Matt0330 on Feb 28, 2026 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
Not quite true
Assembling a great farm system is a wonderfful achievement. But it might take you halfway to building a playoff team.
In Atlanta’s heyday, the large majority of the most valuable hitters and pitchers were homegrown.
If Moore continues to focus on a Braves methodology of building teams primarily via homegrown players - which obviously would include core players that provide the most value - a consistent top-tier farm system would get the Royals much closer than halfway to being a playoff team.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
Hopefully you're right, because that's probably what it will take.
Average prospect flop rates will tell you that there are going to be plenty of holes to fill though.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
I'm not making predictions on prospect outcomes
All I’m saying is that given Moore’s background and comments about his grand vision for KC, it is clear he will emphasize homegrown talent just as much as Atlanta did. Those teams often had ~7 homegrown position players and ~4 homegrown starters, along with a healthy mix in the bullpen and in reserve roles.
If this is his vision, I think a consistently great farm system would certainly get them much further than halfway to being a playoff team.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, it probably depends on how many of the homegrown players are studs or role players.
If we have 5 studs in the system, we have a very bright future and are definitely more than halfway there. If there is 1-2, there is considerable work to do.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 2:54 PM EST up reply actions
atlanta dysnasty
I think saying it was all built on homegrown players is a bit of a stretch. I mean signing the best pitcher of the 90s as a free agent, getting Fred McGriff and John Smoltz in trades, and signing Marquis Grissom, trading for Kenny Lofton were all pretty decent outside the organization moves.
Atlanta did have some really great homegrown guys but I think it is a little overstated saying the “large majority” were from the farm.
by bushe on Feb 28, 2026 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
I think the Cards
Had the most homegrown players in all of baseball last year with 14. And most of them were relievers. You need to be able to acquire other good players through trades and free agency. Even the homegrown Rays have made shrewd trades to get guys like Matt Garza, Jason Bartlett, Edwin Jackson, Ryan Raburn, Ben Zobrist, Carlos Pena, and virtually their entire bullpen.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 28, 2026 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
Good thing I never said it was all built on homegrown players
In Atlanta’s heyday, the large majority of the most valuable hitters and pitchers were homegrown.
Go back and look at the Atlanta playoff teams from the 90’s. You’ve got Glavine, Avery, Smoltz (it’s ridiculous to not count him in a discussion of whether a great farm system is enough to reach the playoffs), Millwood, and Mercker in the rotation. In the field you have Chipper, Jones, Justice, Klesko, Furcal, Lemke, Lopez, etc.
Outside of Maddux and Crime Dog, the huge majority of valuable players came from their minor league system. The overall percentage of homegrown players fluctuated around 50%, but the core players that provided the highest WAR on an annual basis were from their system.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
So?
Yes, the majority of valuable players came from their core, but they got a ton of value every year from outside additions, including their best player.
Nobody’s trivializing the amazing results Atlanta got from its farm system in those years. They were awesome. The broader point, though, is that even with those core players, the Braves had significant holes to fill from outside every year. They needed to fill out the roster well to continue contending. No team can expect to build a contender solely from the farm system. If the GM is terrible at the major league talent acquisition part of his job, that will be a serious handicap on the team’s success, no matter how crazyawesome the farm system is.
You need to lean on a minimum of 16 players for heavy playing time (9 regulars, 5 starters, relief ace & setup man) and in today’s game the reality is that more like 19-21 guys per season get substantial playing time. No farm system, including the Royals, is prepared to graduate that many players at once. The guys who don’t come from within have to not suck if the team’s going to compete.
But to DM’s credit, he seems to be getting a little bit better. He’s abandoned his ridiculous strategy of overpaying for mediocre veterans to come to KC, and he’s made a few not terrible signings this winter (though paying Frenchy $2.5 million looks a lot like burning money). If he doesn’t do a good job filling out the roster though, it pretty much won’t matter how good the farm system is.
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
What do you mean so? That's the entire point
I’ve never once said FA’s are completely unnecessary; that’s your straw man.
My original comment was based on Scott’s guess that a great farm system might take you halfway to building a playoff team. I don’t think that is necessarily true.
In Atlanta’s case, the best players, and the majority of team WAR, was provided by players that came from their farm system. For example, go look at the WS team; 80% of WAR from the starting position players and 62% of WAR from the rotation came from their farm system.
That is what Moore is building for; he has said it over and over and over again. Arguing that it can’t be done because other teams don’t do prioritize it to this degree is weak.
Of course KC will eventually need to make some shrewd FA signings and/or trades, but there is objective proof of a franchise going to the playoffs by relying primarily on value from the farm system. The key for KC is continuing to have a great farm system year in and year out, instead of fading after this current wave.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
If you’re really just responding to the 50% number - which I strongly suspect Scott McKinney chose arbitrarily - then you’re just nitpicking.
His point was that the locus of criticism of Moore is that he doesn’t have the ability to make KC a contender no matter how good their farm system is, because you can’t build a contender on a great farm system alone. The Schuerholz Braves do nothing to invalidate that point.
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
Not nitpicking at all
I’m not sure I’ve heard anyone seriously say a great farm system is all you need to make the playoffs; again, that is a straw man.
But for a team that has expressly stated its desire to rely on its farm system to produce talent on an annual basis, similar to the 90’s Atlanta teams, churning out great prospects is much more important than FA signings.
When your farm ends up providing 70-80% of WAR out of your position players and rotation, plugging in a Roberto Hernandez or Alejandro Pena from free agency to fill in minor holes is not a big concern.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
While that is possible, I think it is highly unlikely.
How many teams get 75% of their WAR from homegrown players? If you’re saying it is possible because it has ever happened, then ok. But lots of things are possible, like me winning the lottery. Don’t bet on it actually happening.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 5:15 PM EST up reply actions
How many teams prioritize it to this degree?
Scouting and player development is a focus for all teams, but it is not necessarily the #1 focus for every franchise. About half the teams in the sport don’t need to overly focus on it simply because they don’t face severe salary constraints like KC does, so the FA market for established players is much more attractive.
All teams have a finite amount of resources, but allocate it differently based on internal priorities. Comparing a team getting 75% of WAR to winning the lottery is strange and illogical.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 5:36 PM EST up reply actions
Comparing a team getting 75% of WAR to winning the lottery is strange and illogical.
How common is it? Assuming your numbers are correct, you found one example in the last twenty years.
And I’m not saying the Royals should change their focus. I’m saying that we shouldn’t expect that a great farm system is going to carry the Royals to the playoffs. Their FO is going to have to also add sigificant talent from outside the organization. And they have been awful at that.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 5:40 PM EST up reply actions
How common is it? Assuming your numbers are correct, you found one example in the last twenty years.
Not sure. Maybe you should do a study? The Atlanta WS team was the first that popped into my mind.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 5:47 PM EST up reply actions
Find one or two others and I'll consider thinking that this is more than extremely rare
Considering prospect failure rates, I imagine more than 50% is pretty rare.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
Their FO is going to have to also add sigificant talent from outside the organization. And they have been awful at that.
This is really the only point that’s important to this conversation. If you don’t disagree with this, deezle, there is absolutely no reason to continue arguing.
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 6:14 PM EST up reply actions
But plugging in a Yuniesky Betancourt or Mike Jacobs is.
Because those guys have negative value.
That’s the point. Moore needs to make good moves to fill out the roster if the Royals ever want to contend and play October baseball, and he’s yet to show that he’s capable of doing so. That’s the criticism Scott was referring to.
I’m not sure I’ve heard anyone seriously say a great farm system is all you need to make the playoffs; again, that is a straw man.
That’s not what Scott was responding to. He was responding to the idea that the criticism of Moore is undeserved because of the great job he’s done with the farm system by pointing out that that’s not going to be enough to make up for his glaring deficiencies elsewhere.
When your farm ends up providing 70-80% of WAR out of your position players and rotation, plugging in a Roberto Hernandez or Alejandro Pena from free agency to fill in minor holes is not a big concern.
At this point I’m not really sure what your point is other than that it’s possible to get more than 50% of your WAR from homegrown talent. If you’re saying Moore doesn’t deserve the criticism because he’ll be able to fill out a competitive roster if he hits those numbers, then consider that even if he’s getting 70-80% of what he’d need from within (that’d be ~29-34 WAR, assuming you need about 93 wins to be a competitive team), he’d still be responsible for acquiring 13-17 wins from other sources.
13-17 wins. Last year, KC’s outside acquisitions amassed 7.1 WAR, which includes Alberto Callaspo who was acquired by Baird (and who Moore traded). Taking out Callaspo Moore’s additions gave the team 5.8 WAR, at a total cost of a bit more than $45 million. That’s really bad.
Even with the rosie assumption that he’ll get that 29-34 wins out of his farm system year in, year out, Moore will need to get about three times the return on his acquisitions than he got last year to build a contender. And 2010 was actually better than 2009.
So yeah, if your GM sucks at acquiring major league talent, it’s tough to envision your team ever contending. And to-date, Dayton Moore’s kind of sucked. This was Scott’s original point (the 50% mark notwithstanding), and it’s my point. What’s your point?
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 5:30 PM EST up reply actions
At this point I’m not really sure what your point is other than that it’s possible to get more than 50% of your WAR from homegrown talent. If you’re saying Moore doesn’t deserve the criticism because he’ll be able to fill out a competitive roster if he hits those numbers, then consider that even if he’s getting 70-80% of what he’d need from within (that’d be ~29-34 WAR, assuming you need about 93 wins to be a competitive team), he’d still be responsible for acquiring 13-17 wins from other sources.
I don’t believe this is nearly as difficult as you think it is when core players are in place that produce. Frankly, Moore has never had core players in place because the KC MLB team has been an absolute disaster for 10+ years; he’s been desperate to find them and has taken many ill-conceived FA and trade gambles that didn’t work. Most of those gambles would not have been made in the first place if the farm system had been producing MLB talent before now.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 5:43 PM EST up reply actions
I wonder if the total WAR of players Moore has brought in from outside the organization over 5 years is even 13, much less 13 per season.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 5:53 PM EST up reply actions
Yuniesky Betancourt and Mike Jacobs weren't gambles
They were overpays for horrible players without upside. Kyle Farnsworth was an overpay for a non-elite reliever. So was Ron Mahay. Jose Guillen and Gil Meche were horrible overpays for guys who were mediocre at best.
It’s not a gamble if the best you can hope for is to break even. It’s just a crappy move.
I don’t believe this is nearly as difficult as you think it is when core players are in place that produce.
You really don’t think it’s difficult to come up with 13-17 WAR per season from outside the organization? The market value of those wins is $65-85 million. An average GM could come up with those wins, and a great one definitely could, but Dayton Moore has fallen far, far short of that every year he’s been at the helm of the Royals.
And again, that’s if he gets 29-34 WAR out of his farm system. That’s still a very, very optimistic projection (as you point out, Atlanta didn’t even hit those #s on a 90-win team in ’95).
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
learn something everyday
never knew Callaspo was acquired by Baird.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Feb 28, 2026 9:20 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah.
The Callaspo trade was in february of ’06. Moore took over in midseason that year.
by slamcactus on Mar 1, 2026 1:21 PM EST up reply actions
you sure?
i think that’s when he was traded to Arizona.
Royals acquired Callaspo winter of ’07.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Mar 1, 2026 4:39 PM EST up reply actions
http://kansascity.royals.mlb.com/team/transactions.jsp?c_id=kc&year=2007&month=12
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Mar 1, 2026 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
Headsmack.
You’re right.
I’ll give credit to Moore for that acquisition. He was a solid player (despite being a pretty horrible human being).
by slamcactus on Mar 1, 2026 5:04 PM EST up reply actions
well
i was pretty sure moore did acquire him. but i had to do a double take. seems like callaspo was so long ago for KC.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Mar 1, 2026 7:13 PM EST up reply actions
This.
I’ll add Terry Pendleton, Andres Galaragga, Denny Neagle, Brian Jordan, Gary Sheffield, Mike Hampton, J.D. Drew, and Tim Hudson as non-homegrown guys who helped keep their string of division titles going.
Atlanta had an incredible pipeline of talent from Justice/Gant/Glavine to Klesko and Chipper to Andruw Jones, but baseball has never seen a team with a farm system that’s so good and so deep that they don’t need to rely on quality help from outside the organization to build a contender.
Dayton Moore needs to make good moves to fill out his roster, or the new generation of Royals’ talent will go the way of the 1997-1999 crop (Damon-Beltran-Dye-Sweeney-Randa.), frittering away their service time on losing seasons until one by one they leave for more money elsewhere.
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
NY and I disagree on this quite a bit
I think those are the only players we can get. Dayton has mentioned before that he knows those guys are just bandaids until we have homegrown players. In the interview he mentioned that we’ll never be able to buy those guys up the middle who produce. So, he’s admitting we can’t do that and he knows we have to build from within.
The FA acquisitions have all been designed to not lose 120 games.
Scouting the Royals
Royals Prospects
by 306008 on Feb 28, 2026 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
During his tenure, the Royals have been able to afford several $1M-5M players and a couple $11M+ players
And for millons, you can acquire decent players and even some good ones. It’s not like every player who makes less than $15M on the FA market is awful. But almost every FA Moore has acquired has been awful, regardless of how much they made. You can get some pretty good players for decent money if your FO can do a decent job of evaluating major league talent. There lies the problem.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
Nobody's saying DM should be breaking the bank to sign Pujols.
He needs to make solid acquisitions, not huge impact ones. The money he’s spent has to-date been spent very, very badly. Even if Gordon and Butler had turned into A-Rod and Teixiera over the past few years the Royals would not have been in a position to compete, because Moore did an awful job at acquiring pieces to surround them.
by slamcactus on Feb 28, 2026 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
So losing 120 games and getting the highest draft pick hurts you more than losing 90 games and getting a worse pick?
At this point it almost seems like Moore was trying to appease the fanbase by spending money but used it on poor players to get the draft picks needed to build the farm system.
All part of THE PROCESS!!!!
by oplaid on Feb 28, 2026 8:08 PM EST up reply actions
it does when you're trying to retain what fanbase you still have
if they do start winning…itd be better to start where the royals are now attendance wise than to start where tampa did
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 8:26 PM EST up reply actions
I've heard Dayton speak before
In the past, he’s almost mentioned the Yankees building around Jeter, Bernie, Mariano, and others. He also talked about how those teams followed the buildign that the Royals did in the early 80’s.
One thing I asked him about in the past was how do you change the culture of a clubhouse/organization and what steps have you taken? He mentioned bringing in people who see things the way you want them too, cleaning house, bringing in the right staff, and preparing to win before you start winning.
Very intelligent person and has done a tremendous job.
Scouting the Royals
Royals Prospects
by 306008 on Feb 28, 2026 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
Love
how candid Moore was. Nice job with the interview.
by Toddius on Feb 28, 2026 10:36 AM EST reply actions
+1
Really impressive how willing and open he was…
by SenorGato on Feb 28, 2026 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
Fantastic Read
This is an amazing quote… And a lot of the reason behind hitter ARL vs. pitcher ARL, in addition to the importance of geographical location and signee status…
MOORE: … It is hard for hitters to develop beyond their level of competition. It is easier for pitchers to improve their game in some ways, a 90 MPH fastball is a 90 MPH fastball. But a hitter, he gets used to facing whatever pitchers he’s facing, he gets grooved to facing that. You can’t learn to hit against pitchers with plus velocity or great breaking stuff unless you see them.
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects for 2011!
- - - - - - - -
You can find my musings at Bullpen Banter and Beyond the Box Score.
Follow Bullpen Banter on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
by JD Sussman on Feb 28, 2026 10:50 AM EST reply actions
damn good interview
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Feb 28, 2026 11:28 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Great interview
In all honesty, I found the Billy Beane interview to largely be a fluff piece with no real hard hitting questions. This interview blows that away as you seem to really get into the troubling issues the average Royals fan has with Moore. Great job.
Big Sexy!
by King Billy Royal on Feb 28, 2026 12:04 PM EST reply actions
Great interview
I’d love to see a follow up with Moore in a year, or maybe two, as some of these prospects graduate and the team begins to shift more focus on the major league team contending.
Nelson Cruz - 2011 MVP
by t ball on Feb 28, 2026 12:38 PM EST reply actions
Amazing interview. He was very open.
You HAVE to do one with Friedman. ;)
by mr. maniac on Feb 28, 2026 1:03 PM EST reply actions
You should have asked him why he's so bad at signing free agents.
by CaptainCanuck on Feb 28, 2026 1:37 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I'm surprised how open he was
Most interviews like this the GM’s just give the usual canned answers, but Moore provided some unique insight.
The comments about Moose, Hosmer (OF seems like a legit possibility), and what they look for when evaluating prospects was really interesting.
by deezle on Feb 28, 2026 1:38 PM EST reply actions
Good interview
Kinda wished you had asked about Salvador Perez - who seems to be skyrocketing in prospect status, and his evaluation of OBA skills in player development, since he seems to not be all that interested in it on a MLB acquisition level. Also maybe how he evaluates defense since he seemed to think Yuni Betancourt was a good defender.
Otherwise, really good questions on Hosmer, Eibner, and others.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 28, 2026 1:39 PM EST reply actions
Might as well of gone all the way and asked
if he felt his return on Cortes and Saito has been worthwhile?
Scouting the Royals
Royals Prospects
by 306008 on Feb 28, 2026 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
Very good interview.
Showed a lot about Dayton Moore IMO. Liked it when he said this feels like his first year. Only bad thing is he still doesn’t do well at all in signing free agents and that worries me.
by vic1124 on Feb 28, 2026 1:43 PM EST reply actions
After reading Moore's comments, how has your opinion of GMDM changed?
John? Everyone else?
Scouting the Royals
Royals Prospects
by 306008 on Feb 28, 2026 2:36 PM EST reply actions
My confidence meter is ticking up every time I read good stuff.
But when he trades his “currency of baseball” in one or two of his prized lefties for some magic beans, I’ll be back to my usual pessimistic self.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
I liked the interview, but I don't see anything which should change anyone's opinion of him
Was there anything new or different here? I mean, there was interesting information, but he confirmed his antiquated process.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
I don't know about that.
I guess I have a really low opinion of him, so when he makes some sense, that ups my opinion of him. He talks well of Kila and about possibly moving Hosmer to the OF. I’m surprised to hear him say these things and hope he’ll continue to change his thinking on others. I think the speed and athleticism comment reflects more on the fact that the Royals have speed without power, or at least I hope it does.
by AxDxMx on Feb 28, 2026 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
What here confirmed his "antiquated process?"
I read almost everything you write so I feel like I shouldn’t have to be asking clarfiying questions any more, but I didn’t follow you here.
"I think a tactical error might have been committed by the manager of the Royals"
by KSinDC on Feb 28, 2026 6:49 PM EST up reply actions
“The Process” means that we focus on scouting and player development.
Scouting shouldn’t be the only way major leaguers are evaluated. And if the major leaguer has several MLB seasons under his belt, scouting shouldn’t even be the primary way major league talent is evaluated. But it has been clear from his acquisitions that scouting and tools-based evaluation is the only way Moore’s FO evaluates any player. This is a very antiquated process.
Also, the Adam Jones comment further shows that Moore is looking only at tools. His ideal team would have someone like Adam Jones in CF because he provides “speed, defense and power.” Unfortunately those tools have only given rise to average performance on the field. And his read of Jones’s defense is at odds with every advanced defensive metric (as it was with Yuni).
Dayton Moore and his front office are living in the 80’s or early 90’s. He’s trying to recreate the Atlanta Braves organization. But the problem is that scouting alone isn’t going to work anymore. Unlike the 80’s and early 90’s, most other organizations are using other means to evaluate major league talent and the dollar value of that talent. So they are doing a better job of putting a major league roster together. Unless Moore opens his mind and diversifies his processes, he won’t be able to compete with those who do.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 7:23 PM EST up reply actions
The entire context of that quote deals with the minor leagues
There’s plenty of evidence that Moore has crappy results with Major League acquisitions. I don’t see the point in taking a quote of his out of context to indict the process he uses. If you think his Minor League process sucks and the results are just a fluke of good luck, I’m actually pretty open to that conclusion.
But I don’t see Moore talking about his process with Major League player acquisition here at all. The player development part of the quote wouldn’t really even make sense in that context. If you think the Major League player acquistion results suck because the process sucks, I’m open to that conclusion, but I think it’s a serious stretch to say that there’s any support for that idea in this interview.
And as I noted over on RR, Adam Jones is +23 Total Zone Rating (source: B-R) over the last three years (positive rating every year), and his WAR is 8.1 over that time span. I’m not staking my reputation on Adam Jones fielding skills, but again, I think you’re stretching to say every advanced defensive metric disagrees with Moore on Jones. And I’ll just pretend the Yuni comparison didn’t happen.
The Royals results in the minor leagues are better than the 29 clubs they’re competing against. I’m a big believer in random variation so I’m not willing to give them all the credit for the BA #1, but I think at least, that result should make it harder to claim that the team is living in the 80s or early 90s.
These are just nitpicks. I’m with you generally on most of the Moore criticisms, but I think you’re overstepping here.
"I think a tactical error might have been committed by the manager of the Royals"
by KSinDC on Feb 28, 2026 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, but...
his major league process also seems to be “trust the process” which once again gets back to building from within and developing the farm system. His process of major league talent acquisition needs to get better.
by slamcactus on Mar 1, 2026 1:52 PM EST up reply actions
Seems more open to moving Hos to the OF than I have read before
I think a move up the defensive spectrum would be wise, especially considering the potential glut of 1B/DH types in Butler, Kila and possibly Clint Robinson.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 28, 2026 3:40 PM EST reply actions
Clint Robinson is in no way contributing to a glut.....
he’s a minor league player.
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Well we'll see
At the very least, Billy + Kila + Hosmer is too many players for 1B and DH.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 28, 2026 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
Hopefully only one of them will fail in the majors.
You may know me as NYRoyal.
by Scott McKinney on Feb 28, 2026 4:13 PM EST up reply actions
Hopefully none of them fail
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 28, 2026 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
im not too concerned with there being a glut....
i think kila will be exposed this year. i hope im wrong and hosmer can successfully adjust to a COF spot or kila can be traded for some more pitching
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Feb 28, 2026 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
Excellent stuff.
Hope he’s not writing the 2011 White Sox Anal too. -Sox Machine
by Jack M on Feb 28, 2026 4:00 PM EST reply actions
Very good stuff
I don’t think you’re going to get many interviews if you take potshots (“why do you suck at evaluating free agents?”) like some people here are suggesting, but I would be very interested in how Moore would answer a question like “What do you think has been your biggest area of improvement since becoming a GM?”
"I think a tactical error might have been committed by the manager of the Royals"
by KSinDC on Feb 28, 2026 6:48 PM EST reply actions
Or "you've taken some criticism on...what do you say to...?"
Nelson Cruz - 2011 MVP
by t ball on Feb 28, 2026 8:43 PM EST up reply actions
Moore is a negative for the Royals at this point.
He’s done a great job of filling the pipeline, so amateur scouting is obviously a great strength. However, he has not shown any genius or creativity in trades and free agent signings. At best, he’s in the third tier with Alderson, Wade, Hendry, Colletti, Mozeliak, MacPhail and Reagins. A small market team like the Royals will need something more to push them over the top. It’s going to be incredibly frustrating to be a Royals’ fan over the next 3-4 years unless Moore is replaced.
by HeavyHitter on Feb 28, 2026 9:55 PM EST reply actions
Great Q and A
I’ve read a lot of interviews with Moore and this produced the most insightful responses not the usual corporate double speak sound bites I usually read. I sense he respects your knowledge John and this was really a good read. I don’t know if it was respect or the way you framed your questions (simple and direct-the usual media interviewer wastes about 30 seconds prefacing a question to make themselves look smart and ends up asking something muddled or banal. Your questions were excellent and inviting for elaboration on his part.
by ribman on Feb 28, 2026 11:35 PM EST reply actions
The Interview
Felt you could have expanded on a few points in the interview. Such as Moore’s comment on Mongomery’s stuff. No real structure in my opinion.
by Kyle Schnitzer on Feb 28, 2026 11:40 PM EST reply actions
Outstanding Interview John...
Great questions; a super read, thx for posting & Thx to Moore for the length & depth of his responses. Really good stuff!
by almantle on Mar 1, 2026 9:10 PM EST reply actions

by John Sickels on 












