Career Profile and Prospect Retro: Jason Varitek
Career Profile: Jason Varitek
As you know by now, long-time Red Sox catcher Jason Varitek announced his retirement last week. Let's review his career, see what kind of prospect he was, and where he ranks in historical context.
A star catcher at Georgia Tech, Varitek was drafted in the first round by the Minnesota Twins in 1993, 21st overall. However, they were unable to come to terms, and Varitek returned to school for his senior season. He was drafted in the first round again in '94, this time by the Mariners 14th overall. He didn't sign right away and signed a contract with the St. Paul Saints, but eventually Scott Boras and the Mariners came to an agreement.
Varitek made his pro debut for Double-A Port City in 1995 and was terrible, hitting just .224/.340/.361. He did hit 10 homers and draw 61 walks, but he struck out 126 times in 352 at-bats. He was unimpressive on defense as well, throwing out 27% of runners (worse than expected) while coughing up 21 passed balls in just 89 games behind the plate. Reports were pretty negative and he was generally considered a massive disappointment. He was supposed to be a future star, but his performance didn't match the expectations generated in college.
Varitek returned to Port City in 1996 and improved slightly, hitting .262/.350/.406 with 12 homers. He drew 66 walks and reduced his strikeout rate, whiffing 93 times in 503 at-bats, and he wasn't as bad with the glove, either, although his 29% caught rate was still not as good as anticipated. He was now 24 years old and had repeated the league without a massive upgrade in performance.
Moved up to Triple-A Tacoma for 1997, Varitek hit .254/.329/.443 with 15 homers, 34 walks, and 71 strikeouts in 307 at-bats. Late that summer he was traded from the Mariners to the Red Sox along with Derek Lowe in exchange for Heathcliff Slocumb. He hit .197/.284/.318 in 20 games for Pawtucket after the trade. Reviews of his defense were improving and he looked a lot more like the player anticipated on defense, but his swing was perceived as too slow and long for him to be a major league star at that point. He looked like a Grade C prospect to me, and I wrote "while Varitek won't be a luminary in the Show, his combination of power and defense does have value, provided that expectations aren't too high."
Varitek played 86 games for the Red Sox in 1998 at age 26, hitting .253/.309/.407 with seven homers. He took over as the full-time regular in 1999 at age 27, hitting a more luminous .269/.330/.482 with 20 homers, beginning a decade-long run as the primary Red Sox catcher.
He had particularly good offensive seasons in 2001 (.293/.371/.489, OPS+123), 2005 (.281/.366/.489, OPS+122), and 2004 (.296/.390/.482, OPS+121). His peak season according to WAR was 2004 with a 4.3 mark. Overall, he hit .256/.341/.435 in a 1546-game major league career, with a 25.5 WAR. He was the first catcher in Red Sox history to catch 1,000 games. A three-time All-Star, he holds a major league record by catching four no-hitters.
Looking at history, Varitek's total WAR ranks 64th-all time among catchers, in the neighborhood with Joe Ferguson (26.0), Terry Kennedy (25.6), Jack Clements (25.4), and Johnny Kling (24.8), solid players though not Hall of Fame types. His most comparable players by Sim Score are Ramon Hernandez, Del Crandall, Terry Steinbach, Sherm Lollar, Bill Freehan, Darrell Porter, Walker Cooper, A.J. Pierzynski, Frankie Hayes, and Mike Lieberthal. Again, all solid players but short of elite.
Overall, Varitek was a very solid player who turned out better than his minor league numbers would lead you to expect. In his case, the scouting reports from college turned out to be better indicators than what he was doing in Double-A and Triple-A.
11 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
His holdouts
There have been a few articles suggesting that Boras cost Varitek millions by not signing when he was drafted, it pushed back his arbitration clock and future millions off the table.
I wonder if, when he was getting drafted, Boras thought Varitek was more like the AA numbers suggested and was more worried about getting him as much money as possible, thinking he might flame out as a prospect.
by Gunnarthor on Mar 6, 2026 6:03 PM EST reply actions
Maybe he was a juicer.
Would it really shock anyone?
Cherington has taken off his pants and he’s shitting all over my hopes for 2012
by TheLoneDavid on Jan 10, 2026 12:31 PM CST
by SandalsNoPants on Mar 6, 2026 7:02 PM EST reply actions
Wow nice one sparky
What the hell led you to think that?
by sportsfreak2744 on Mar 6, 2026 7:07 PM EST up reply actions
Crap numbers until his
peak at the height of the steroid era.
Probably a coincidence.
Cherington has taken off his pants and he’s shitting all over my hopes for 2012
by TheLoneDavid on Jan 10, 2026 12:31 PM CST
by SandalsNoPants on Mar 6, 2026 7:27 PM EST up reply actions
I had the same thought when looking at the disparity between minors and majors
expectations are premeditated resentments - cheshirecat
by kcgard2 on Mar 6, 2026 8:38 PM EST up reply actions
Spurred my memory!
(opens in new window)
In your Red Sox column, I couldn’t help but stutter when I got to the part about Jason Varitek and Trot Nixon (“noticeably trimmer and with less pop”). Short of saying “Jason and Trot sure miss that flaxseed oil and the clear,” what are you insinuating? I’m not from Egypt, and don’t know about da’ Nile.
— John, Windsor, Conn.
Ah, yes, this is the shadowy age we live in, the one owners and players created by giving us the Steroid Era. Scouts take note all the time of players who look smaller and show less pop. They use the line “Congress got him” to explain some guys’ declines. If you’ve been watching the past two seasons, you know what I mean. That said, I do think both players got very big, and at their age, and in Nixon’s case, with his injury history, they’re probably better off being a bit lighter. The question is not what happened — everybody deserves the benefit of the doubt — but will they suffer any decline? Pudge Rodriguez, Bobby Higginson, Scott Spiezio, Ryan Klesko, Nomar Garciaparra … all suffered declines when they weren’t as bulked.
Verducci does nothing to deny Varitek’s use. This is a bit like Braun: I think ‘Tek probably did juice. However, he never failed a test and he played in a significant portion of his career in the post-Mitchell (i.e. strong) testing era. So far as I’m concerned, that sleeping dog should be left to lie.
by GuyinNY on Mar 7, 2026 10:26 AM EST up reply actions
Sorry for the mass post.
Couldn’t figure out that link doohicky: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/tom_verducci/05/03/baseball.mailbag/index.html
by GuyinNY on Mar 7, 2026 10:27 AM EST up reply actions
Career highlight
Other than the two WS and four no no’s, was shoving Arod in the face with the mitt.
"When the going gets tough, the tough get going."
by BenMc5 on Mar 6, 2026 8:42 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Bill Freehan
Looking at history, Varitek’s total WAR ranks 64th-all time among catchers, in the neighborhood with Joe Ferguson (26.0), Terry Kennedy (25.6), Jack Clements (25.4), and Johnny Kling (24.8), solid players though not Hall of Fame types. His most comparable players by Sim Score are Ramon Hernandez, Del Crandall, Terry Steinbach, Sherm Lollar, Bill Freehan, Darrell Porter, Walker Cooper, A.J. Pierzynski, Frankie Hayes, and Mike Lieberthal. Again, all solid players but short of elite.
Freehan an 11 time all-star and a excellent defensive catcher with a baseball reference WAR of 43.3 and a fangraphs WAR of 52.8 is a much better/elite catcher than those you put him with. Plus those career numbers were during the pitchers era.
by KalineCountry on Mar 6, 2026 8:48 PM EST reply actions
Freehan
I don’t disagree with that, but the Freehan comp came from Sim Scores, which don’t adjust by era. Freehan was a considerably better player than Varitek, so i agree with you.
by John Sickels on Mar 6, 2026 8:59 PM EST reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by John Sickels on 













