Rich Wilson's Top 100 Prospect List (#76-#100)
Today marks the beginning of my 2012 Top 101 prospects review. In this post, we'll be looking at prospects #101 to #76. Additionally, I'll be doing a special podcast on Monday, December 12th at 9pm to discuss - http://tinyurl.com/bshy6e3.
76. Bryce Brentz – OF (Boston Red Sox)
Drafted in the Supplement Round of the 2010 draft, Bryce Brentz’s calling card is his plus-plus raw power. Across Low-A and High-A in 2011, Brentz belted 30 home runs but did have some contact problems (75%) as his swing will get long as he tries to muscle up. 2012 will be an important year for Brentz as he moves to Double-A and more advanced pitching.
77. John Lamb – LHP (Kansas City Royals)
John Lamb, Danny Duffy, and Mike Montgomery were the lefties of the future for the Kansas Royals. Duffy made it to the show and had limited success, Montgomery lost his command and Lamb had Tommy John Surgery. Best laid plans… While there is now considerable risk placed on John Lamb as not everyone recovers from TJS, the talent is still there. His fastball sits at 92-94MPH with above average control and command and his curve and change-up both flash plus. Three above average pitches with above average command? I’ll take it, TJS or not.
78. Grant Green – SS/OF (Oakland A’s)
Drafted as a shortstop, moved to second, and now it appears he will make his way to the majors as an outfielder. Grant Green is a nice athletic player with an upside of a solid regular. Fans in particular got excited in 2010 when he hit 20 home runs in the California league, but for many young players, the power leaves upon promotion to Double-A. I would look for a .270 player with 10-15 home run power and 10 stolen bases.
79. Jedd Gyorko – 3B (San Diego Padres)
When you first see Jedd Gyorko, you don’t think, “WOW, that guy looks like a ballplayer?????” Short and squat at 5-10 and 195 lbs, Jedd Gyorko posses a great hit tool with nice bat speed and above average power potential. In 2011, he had an excellent 80% contact rate and an 11% walk rate. Based on his lack of athleticism, Gyorko may eventually move to a corner outfield spot. While he demonstrated power in the hitter friendly CAL league, the home runs didn't follow him to Double-A.
80. Sonny Gray – RHP (Oakland A’s)
Sonny Gray is not a physically imposing pitcher, standing only 5-10 and weighing a nice squatty 200lbs. He is though a strikeout pitcher due to his plus power curve that is clearly a swing and miss pitch. He was able to get 22 innings in professional ball during 2011, primarily in Double-A and was impressive, striking out 20 battings and walking only 6. Look for Gray to start 2012 in Double-A with a potential September call-up.
81. Derek Norris – C (Washington Nationals)
Derek Norris appears to be your prototypical young catcher working his way to the majors. He has power as is evidence by his 20 home runs in Double-A in 2011 but he also struck out 117 times in 339 at bats. I’ll save you the trouble of running for your calculator, that’s a 65% contact rate. What might set him apart and make him a solid regular major leaguer is he’s a walk machine. Last year, he had a walk rate of 20% and in 2010, his walk rate was a ridiculous 30%.
82. Mason Williams – OF (New York Yankees)
Signed as a $1.45M overslot 4th round draftee in the 2010 draft, Mason Williams was one of the poster children for Bud Selig’s clamp down on draft spending. The early results are showing that Williams was well worth the money. With plus-plus speed and very good defensive centerfield skills, the Yankees revamped his swing to increase the time through the zone in order to drive more pitches. The results in 2011 were encouraging. In 289 at bats in the NY Penn league, Williams batted .349 with a decent .468 SLG while striking out only 41 times and walking 20 times. Oh yeah, he stole 28 bases.
83. Matt Szczur – OF (Chicago Cubs)
In 2010, Szczur picked baseball over football as he signed a complicated deal with the Cubs. When drafted, scouts knew Szczur had plus-plus speed but worried that he would hit enough. In 2011, that was not a problem as he batted .293 across Low-A in High-A to go along with 24 stolen bases. His contact rate was nearly 90% but his walk rate was a paltry 6%. He’s a bit of a slappy hitter, so don’t expect a lot of power once fully developed.
84. Zack Cox – 3B (St. Louis Cardinals)
Drafted as a first rounder in the 2010 draft, Cox signed for an impressive $3M signing bonus based on his hit tool. The hit tool did not fail in his first year of professional ball, batting .306 across High-A and Double-A with a 98K/40BB in 516 at bats. The concern when he came out of college was his ability to hit for power. In High-A, he hit only three home runs in the cavernous Florida State League but upon promotion to the more hitter friendly Texas League, he hit 10 bombs. With little speed and average defensive skills, Cox will need to develop some pop in order to be viewed as a first division starter.
85. Allen Webster – RHP (Los Angeles Dodgers)
At 21 years-old, Allen Webster is already deemed to be a very polished pitcher with a 92-94MPH fastball with heavy sink that produced a very high number of ground ball outs (1.76 GO/AO in 2011). He has a plus change-up with an improving curve and a great strikeout rate of 135K in 145 innings. With his stuff and command, it was surprising that he gave up a 101 hits in 90 innings in Double-A. Should we chalked it up to a very unlucky BABIP or is his stuff just hittable to more advanced hitters?
86. Nate Eovaldi - RHP (Los Angeles Dodgers)
Nate Eovaldi had Tommy John surgery in his junior year of high school and that scared many teams off from signing him. The Dodgers took the plunge in the 11th round and have been rewarded as Eovaldi made his major league debut at the ripe old age of 21. He wasn’t overly effective as he walked 20 in 35 innings but his stuff and minor league track record predict a promising future. Eovaldi throws a heavy 92-93MPH two-seam fastball hitting higher and causing lots of ground balls (GO/AO of 1.49). His curveball is above average and even flashes plus, while his change-up is still pretty fringy. While he might have been rushed, there’s a lot to like here.
87. George Springer – OF (Houston Astros)
After Anthony Rendon, many scouts considered George Springer to be the best college positional bat in the 2011 draft. He has a nice combination of power and speed but his swing can get a little long and is therefore prone to strikeout a lot. Scouts do love his make-up, so he should take instruction well and hopefully correct both his erratic approach and propensity to strikeout. While there is huge upside in Springer, it doesn’t come free.
88. Josh Bell – OF (Pittsburgh Pirates)
Josh Bell had everyone convinced that he was going to the University of Texas to play on a partial scholarship for three years. However, a $5M signing bonus plus a fund set aside to pay for four years at a University down the road goes a long way. Bell is blessed with tremendous physical gifts, including a lot of natural raw power and the ability to make hard contact. He is an older high school player and will actually turn 20 during his first year of pro ball but is also relatively advanced for most players coming directly from high school to professional ball.
89. Josh Vitters – 3B (Chicago Cubs)
Taken #3 overall in the 2007 draft, Josh Vitters continues to confound everybody in baseball. He has one of the best right-handed strokes in any level of professional baseball, but his approach is one of the worse. Without changes, Vitters will never become the elite player that the Cubs thought they drafted. Make-up is an overused phrase, but in my mind, a player who is unwilling to take instruction and continue to believe he has all the answers is the definition of bad make-up. Most thought last year was the make it or break it year, I’m giving it one more year.
90. Robbie Erlin – LHP (San Diego Padres)
If you look only at stats, Robbie Erlin looks like the best pitcher in the minors. In 2011, across High-A and Double-A, he struck out 154 batters in 147.1 innings while only walking 16. You know you have good control when you can name the guys you walked! The fastball is only average at 88-91MPH but since he throws strikes, he gets ahead of batters and puts them away with two plus secondary pitches -a nasty curve and even better change-up. The move to San Deigo is what has gotten me excited as I believe that profile will play well in the Petco Park and the poor offensive environment of the NL West.
91. Addison Reed – RHP (Chicago White Sox)
It’s a little frightening when the best prospect in an MLB organization is a relief pitcher, but that is the sad case with the Chicago White Sox and years of playing by the slot recommendation of Major League Baseball. That said, Addison Reed is a very good pitcher. With the ability to throw in the upper 90’s with a nasty slider and also an above average change-up, Reed could eventually profile as a starter but most scouts believe he will be most effective as an “all-out” late inning reliever. Don’t be shocked if Addison Reed becomes the White Sox closer as early as 2012, he’s that good.
92. Matt Davidson – 3B (Arizona Diamondbacks)
Drafted in the supplemental round of the 2009 draft, Matt Davidson brings a combination of a quick bat with a nice approach to the plate that should enable him to become a solid regular third baseman in the big leagues. In 2011 in High-A, Davidson hit 20 home runs but did strikeout an alarming 147 times in 535. Given his quick power stroke, this is hopefully more of being overly aggressive as opposed to have a flaw in his swing. Expect Davidson to start 2012 in Double-A.
93. Tyrell Jenkins – RHP (St. Louis Cardinals)
St. Louis is stacked with elite pitching prospects and while Tyrell Jenkins might be one of the lesser known pitching prospects, his stuff and athleticism are as good as anyone in the system. Jenkins was taken in the Supplemental Round of the 2010 draft with a $1.3M signing bonus to lure him away from Baylor as a wide receiver. Jenkins sits 93-96MPH with a tight 12-6 curve and an emerging change-up. He’ll move to full season ball next year at Low-A, where more fans will get a chance to see what all the excitement is about.
94. Joe Wieland – RHP (San Diego Padres)
Wieland was the other finesse pitcher in the Mike Adams trade at the 2011 trading deadline. His fastball ranges in the 88-92MPH range with a big breaking curve. His average change-up completes the arsenal. The results in 2011 across High-A and Double A were extremely impressive with 150 strikeouts in 155.2 inning with only 21 walks. As with Robbie Erlin, high control and command pitchers with average to above average stuff can play very well in Petco and the NL West.
95. Alex Meyer – RHP (Washington Nationals)
Alex Meyer is a high risk/high reward prospect. Taken as the 23rd pick in the 2011 draft, Meyer has great stuff with a plus 94-96MPH explosive fastball to go along with a plus-plus slider with late life and tilt. The problem is the control and at 6-9, he’s got a tough job ahead of him. In fact, many scouts don’t believe his control will ever get above average and that could eventually force him to the bullpen. His stuff is elite but whether he can harness and control the stuff is where the risk exists.
96. Starling Marte – OF (Pittsburgh Pirates)
I’m not sold on Starling Marte. On the positive side, he’s got plus-plus speed that translates into speed on the base path as well as excellent range in the outfield. In fact, he’s a joy to watch in the outfield, seemingly able to catch anything hit near him. The problem is an overly aggressive approach at the plate. Marte swings at everything, walking 22 times in 536 at bats in Double-A. Fortunately he does make contact and with his speed, has a chance to reach base frequently. Throw in some above average power and Marte has a chance to be a star if he can just temper his overly aggressive approach at the plate.
97. Justin Nicolino – LHP (Toronto Blue Jays)
Justin Nicolino was the best pitcher in the Northwest League in 2011 with a 64K/11B over 52 innings. Nicolino was drafted in the second round of the 2010 draft and at 19 years old, has a nice three pitch arsenal that includes a 90-92MPH fastball with a lot of sink (1.44 GO/AO rate). He’ll pick up where he left off in Low-A to start the 2012 season. With his maturity and arsenal, a mid season promotion to High-A seems reasonable.
98. Chad Bettis – RHP (Colorado Rockies)
Bettis was taken in the second round of the 2010 draft out of Texas Tech University. He has plus velocity, sitting 93-94 and touching higher. His secondary pitches are ok but still need work with an above average curve and a below average change-up. He pitched the entire 2011 season in the hitter friendly California league and dominated, striking out 184 in 169.2 and walking only 45. They key will be the development of his change-up. If it progresses, he could be a solid #3 with #2 upside. If not, he has a chance to be a late inning reliever.
99. Jed Bradley – LHP (Milwaukee Brewers)
Taken with the #15 pick in the 2011 amateur draft, Bradley is a power lefty with a major league frame at 6-4 and 225 lbs. His fastball sits at 88-94MPH with sink; which is a broad range and therefore shows some inconsistencies. He also has a plus slider and his change-up is decent for a college pitcher, but will need to improve. Scouts love his makeup and believe he will quickly advance through the system.
100. Javier Baez – SS (Chicago Cubs)
One of the better high school positional prospects in the 2011 draft, Javier Baez has a very quick bat with plus raw power. While he was drafted as a shortstop, most scouts believe he will outgrow the position and will have to move to 3B. He got very high marks in the Arizona Instructional League, which is good as the big black mark against Baez was a questionable make-up.
101. Luis Heredia – RHP (Pittsburgh Pirates)
Luis Heredia fits the profile of a #101 ranking in a Top 100 list – a kid who has sky high potential but with tremendous risk. Heredia who hails from Mexico, signed one of the largest international bonuses at $2.6M in 2010 for Pittsburgh. He’s a big kid at 6-6 and 205lbs and has an electric fastball that can flash in the upper 90’s. He’s already proven an ability to spin a curve and his change-up has flashed plus potential. Ignore the stats in the Gulf league because at 16-years old, what can you really expect? Next year, Heredia could be a legitimate Top 50 prospect or be put in the bucket of woulda/coulda.
55 comments
|
Add comment
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Grant Green
To me, he doesn’t have any business on a top-100 list.
"Hello. My name is Matthew Berry. I am on a Fantasy Jihad. Prepare to die!"
by Dominatio on Dec 11, 2025 6:28 PM EST reply actions
Dont Agree
In a pitchers league (Texas League). Green was 10th in avg, 2nd in hits, 3rd in doubles. Done while changing positions. Sure the power numbers were down. Most players that come from the Caili League to the Texas League will see a reduction in power.
by down-n-dirty on Dec 19, 2025 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
still was an average hitter
And I was high on Grant Green last year.
97 wRC+, 100 wOBA+, 99 OPS+
by cookiedabookie on Dec 19, 2025 8:22 PM EST up reply actions
The Texas League
played as a pitcher’s league this year(or recently)? Not as extreme as the Cal, but I’m not sure I’ve seen it referred to as a pitcher’s league before.
http://bullpenbanter.com
RIP Randy "Macho Man" Savage
by gatling on Dec 19, 2025 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
TL
…is a hitters’ league. Only San Antonio plays to a pitcher’s advantage.
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 20, 2025 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
I'd take a lot of guys here over Szczur
But that’s the love/hate thing he’s got goin’ on.
Founder and Chairman of the Send Dan Some Pizzeria Bianco Commission (SDSPBC). SDSPBC is a totally, definitely for-profit organization.
by Dan Strittmatter on Dec 11, 2025 9:07 PM EST reply actions
We really wont know until 2012 with Szczur...
It’ll be a big year for him, likely starting in AA.
by bdlugz on Dec 13, 2025 3:15 PM EST up reply actions
I prefer lists with some reasoning thrown behind the rankings.
Enjoyed reading it - greatly prefer this to simple lists of names. If you have Nicolino in your top 100 and I don’t, it’s easy to say “Terrible list - I don’t have Nicolino in my top 100!” or “Great list - identical to mine!”, but that’s pretty meaningless to me. Nice to hear your thought process.
by Brownson on Dec 11, 2025 9:58 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
+1 on the commentary
go long with extenze...i do
by angelsownredsux on Dec 12, 2025 12:42 AM EST up reply actions
wieland
was traded for mike adams, no matt adams
by rangersfan24 on Dec 11, 2025 10:30 PM EST reply actions
Wieland
Thought I caught that in editing but didn’t. Thanks. Fixed.
by Rich Wilson on Dec 12, 2025 10:47 AM EST up reply actions
At
first I balked at your lowish placement of Marte, but I like the reasoning. I can’t argue with it; I just simply think Marte’s plate discipline is better than what the numbers show. My reasoning from that comes from seeing him play several times.
I do agree though, he has some risk because of the bad walk rate, and he does strikeout a fair bit.
Nice to see Heredia slot in there at #101. I also don’t mind Bell where he is. I loved getting him, but I think the top 50 is too much for him. 80’s is a good spot.
On non-Pirates
I’d put Springer higher, but at least you have a theme going with him and Marte.
I guess Baez where he is alright, but I straight up don’t like him as a prospect. I don’t think he will hit all that much and he’s not sticking at short if you ask me. I could be wrong though.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 11, 2025 10:30 PM EST reply actions
i expect
springer and bell will both shoot up lists this year or next. both have a ton of talent. i agree wit you on baez too though
by rangersfan24 on Dec 11, 2025 10:32 PM EST up reply actions
+1
It’ll be good to see Springer and Baez in professional ball to see what they can really do. While I like Springer’s skill-set, it will probably come down to how much he strikes out.
by Rich Wilson on Dec 12, 2025 11:35 AM EST up reply actions
Ya
you seem to be adverse to strikeouts, and there is nothing wrong with that. While most of us dream on tools, the smart people (you) are like “hey he strikes out once every three at-bats… he’ll do nothing in the majors.”
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 12, 2025 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
I think everyone projects Baez as a 3B in the future.
He’ll likely stick at SS for 2012, however. He was a pick that intrigued me, but worried me at the same time, but I think at the end of the day his bat will play.
by bdlugz on Dec 13, 2025 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks
I don’t know as much as I want to about the lower half top 100 prospects, so these write ups are very nice.
by MilesC on Dec 12, 2025 12:44 AM EST reply actions
I would be surprised if Alex Myer's control ever reached below average.
Its like a 25 grade. Purely awful.
by mr. maniac on Dec 12, 2025 11:24 AM EST reply actions
+1
I saw him pitch twice and he is an intimating guy on the mound. The control was ok once and awful the second time. Both times, there were two dozen scouts in a attendance and everybody’s gun was lighting up to 96-97. I talked to several between innings and everybody was…guy has nasty stuff if he can get the ball over.
by Rich Wilson on Dec 12, 2025 8:54 PM EST up reply actions
Seems
reminiscent of Fabio Martinez-Mesa of Miguel De Los Santos in the “nasty stuff.. if he can get the ball over” department.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 13, 2025 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
Excellent List
I’ll just add to the chorus on the write-ups - phenomenal, especially for the lesser known guys.
Looking forwards to the remaining 3/4
by MjwW on Dec 13, 2025 2:49 AM EST reply actions
+1
Thanks, we went into a lot of details on our podcast last night. You can check it out at http://tinyurl.com/bshy6e3. Next list and Podcast come out around Christmas.
by Rich Wilson on Dec 13, 2025 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
Jenkins
Little nitpicky but Jenkins was going to Baylor as a QB and not WR.
Redbird Dugout
http://www.redbirddugout.com
by JDizzidy on Dec 13, 2025 10:36 PM EST reply actions
Jenkins
You could be right as I don’t profess to know the whole story but in my research, I read an interview that given Griffin still had three years of eligibility left, Baylor wanted to get Jenkins playing and would move him to wide out. He apparently had 10.x 100 meter speed, which translates to a plus, or even a plus-plus speed. In looking at the high school records, he also averaged 19 PPG in basketball. Crazy athlete.
by Rich Wilson on Dec 13, 2025 11:25 PM EST reply actions
Sheesh
Seems like Jenkins is from that class of guys who end up to be scratch golfers and insane at billiards as well. Type of guy you just don’t want to compete against in general.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 14, 2025 5:42 AM EST up reply actions
Sheesh
Don’t forgot darts
@RichWilsonFSG
by Rich Wilson on Dec 14, 2025 3:11 PM EST up reply actions
He's
probably a card shark as well.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 14, 2025 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
3 amigos (Padres)
…are all too low… Gyoko CAN handle 3B in fact he’s surprised scouts by performing quite adeptly at the hot corner… As for his power not following him to AA, he struggled for about the first month after the promotion but then came on. He’s not a CAL-creation either (you didn’t claim that but it seemed somewhat implied) his home park was 425 to left-center (pitchers’ park in a hitters’ league).
Also, Wieland was thought of as a soft-tosser but increased velocity has him routinely touching 94…
I think you under-rating some pretty special players…
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 15, 2025 12:50 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
surprise!
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Dec 15, 2025 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
Pretty much
I wonder which of the 21st century SD minors Three Amigos is the equivalent of Ned Nederlander by the way?
by Matt0330 on Dec 16, 2025 9:43 AM EST up reply actions
3 amigos
Thanks for the comments.
I like them all. In fact, I like the Padres organization depth as they will have 7 in my top 100 - the most of any organization. However, when I do a weighted ranking, they fall just outside the top 10. I just don’t see any stars. I saw Gyorko in the AFL and I didn’t see the power, either in games or batting practice. Not a lot of loft in the swing. Guy can definitely hit. Also, once he gets to Petco, the power, what he has will not play. I see him as a solid regular. I really like Spandenberg though. Will see him soon.
@RichWilsonFSG
by Rich Wilson on Dec 15, 2025 10:24 PM EST up reply actions
"I saw Gyorko in the AFL and I didn’t see the power.."
Wow.
Ten guys in the AFL hit five (a total which led the league last year) or more homers this year, only one (Michael Choice) did so in fewer AB’s and games than Gyorko.
He’s easily a 20 HR guy annually in the majors, probably closer to 30 as he gets older.
by Kelsdad on Dec 20, 2025 11:55 AM EST reply actions
you can't compare
the AFL to 81 games in Petco. His power is average, and that stadium will sap most of his over the fence power. Could be a doubles machine with that stroke, though.
by another know it all on Dec 20, 2025 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
Gyorko
Agree that his power is average and Petco will be a problem. When I saw him in the AFL, his stroke was more line drive. Little loft in the swing and not a pull hitter. More spraying to all fields. I got a chance to see him in only on batting practice and thought the same.
@RichWilsonFSG
by Rich Wilson on Dec 20, 2025 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
As a RHH
…He hit plenty in the CAL where it’s 425 to left-center… Right-handed pull power is the easiest (relative term) place to hit them out in Petco… I look foward to a Chase Headley trade to open 3B for Gyorko.
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 20, 2025 6:46 PM EST up reply actions
petco might affect his raw stats
but not his value
by Bososx13 on Dec 20, 2025 8:12 PM EST up reply actions
ummm
how wouldn’t it? His value is affected the same way Alonso and Grandal had theirs affected with the Latos trade.
by another know it all on Dec 20, 2025 10:30 PM EST up reply actions
wait
how were theirs affected by the Latos trade?
i still like Grandal just as much as i did prior to the trade
by blue bulldog on Dec 21, 2025 4:58 AM EST up reply actions
another know it all
must be referring to fantasy value. obviously parks don’t affect actual value other that for player particularly hurt by certain parks maybe, and certainly the organization someone is in doesn’t affect prospect value in any way.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 7:00 AM EST up reply actions
not necessarily
offensive potential and fantasy value are not one in the same.
Let’s assume Grandal plays his entire career with the Padres. Let’s also assume no injuries and 120 games played per season (60 home games). While he’s obviously the exact same player he was while he was with the Reds, you cannot tell me you can project the same peak offensive numbers while playing his home games in a park that suppresses offensive so dramatically.
Maybe it’s just me, but when I look at prospects, I look at them outside of a vacuum. Park factors are prominently used for a reason.
by another know it all on Dec 21, 2025 8:31 AM EST up reply actions
why would I care about his environment-adjusted numbers?
Nobody should seriously think that he would be any more or less of a player because of where he plays. His level of ability is unaffected by his environment.
Park factors are identified and incorporated into performance analysis so we can neutralize their effects. You’re actually using them for the opposite reason - you’re incorporating them as the separator in outcomes.
I’d love to see your top prospects list. I’m guessing there’s about 15 Colorado Rockies position players on there.
by mrkupe on Dec 21, 2025 8:45 AM EST up reply actions
major league park factors
are identified and incorporated into the performance analysis of minor league players? I don’t think so. If you re-read my post you replied to, I clearly stated that Grandal, or any other player for that matter, is the exact same prospect he was after the trade. His tools grade out the same, his ability to call a game and handle pitchers is exactly the same, and his chance of reaching the major leagues is exactly the same.
“His level of ability is unaffected by his environment.”
I never said it did. Maybe I made the mistake of being a little too specific here, I don’t know. I’m not saying that a player in A ball should have his prospect status diminished because he one day may play in AT&T park or Safeco or what have you. I’m saying that, for Grandal and Alonso’s case (prospects on the brink of a full time job in the bigs), there status as future big leaguers (not prospects) was slightly altered.
“I’d love to see your top prospects list. I’m guessing there’s about 15 Colorado Rockies position players on there.”
No need for snide remarks. I’ve seen you on more than one occasion berate posters for like-minded posts. Don’t be a hypocrite. I value your opinion very highly on this site, don’t make me change that.
“Gyorko
Agree that his power is average and Petco will be a problem."-Rich Wilson
by another know it all on Dec 21, 2025 9:13 AM EST up reply actions
you also stated
“Maybe it’s just me, but when I look at prospects, I look at them outside of a vacuum. Park factors are prominently used for a reason.”
What am I supposed to take from that? So okay, I apologize. Tell me what it is you’re trying to say, because right now, you are contradicting yourself.
by mrkupe on Dec 21, 2025 9:25 AM EST up reply actions
true
that is a contradiction. Evidently I’ve been to vague, not too specific like I thought. I’m just stating that I take park factors into consideration when projecting a players ceiling.
Doesn’t really apply to low level prospects and I’m not trying to say that’s the way everyone should do it. But park factors shouldn’t be ignored when evaluating a AAA player after a trade.
by another know it all on Dec 21, 2025 9:39 AM EST up reply actions
You are valuing stats in a very basic way then.
Most people that seriously follow baseball stats, will adjust the numbers to account for the fact that some people play in Cincinnati and some people play in San Diego. So if Player X ends up with 18 HR and a .275 average in a pitchers park, that might be the equivalent to 21 HR and a .285 average in a hitters park. Both those stat lines are equivalent (I’m not doing actual math here of course). So his offensive value is same. His fantasy value is different, which I assumed was your point.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
Look at it this way
I take a more practical look at prospects… i don’t care how they stack up against other prospects. Prospect A does this better than prospect B, so he must be better. Not how it works in the real world, sorry.
Top prospect lists are fun and create some interesting banter, but are completely irrelevant and I believe they only serve to confuse and distort the thinking of prospect hounds like yourself. Case in point, the 15 or so Colorado Rockies in my non-existent top prospect list.
by another know it all on Dec 21, 2025 10:01 AM EST up reply actions
don't get me wrong
I’m not exactly a list junkie myself. At least not to the point where I’d restrain myself to the “100 good prospects and that’s it” line of thinking.
I don’t think anybody here thought you were comparing prospects to other prospects. You’re talking about how specific players would perform in the majors. The comparisons you seem to be making are along the lines of “Player A in San Diego” to “Player A in Cincinnati”. Which one of them is better? It’s the baseball equivalent to “What weighs more, a ton of feathers or a ton of bricks?”
by mrkupe on Dec 21, 2025 10:24 AM EST up reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.

- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!















