Boston Red Sox Top 20 Prospects for 2011
Boston Red Sox Top 20 Prospects for 2011
All grades are EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY and subject to change. Don't get too concerned about exact rankings at this point, especially once you get past the Top 10. Grade C+/C guys are pretty interchangeable depending on what you want to emphasize.
Feel free to critique the list, but use logic and reason rather than polemics to do to. The list and grades are a blending of present performance and long-term potential. Full reports on all of players can be found in the 2011 Baseball Prospect Book. We are now taking pre-orders. Order early and order often!
QUICK PRIMER ON GRADE MEANINGS:
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
Boston Red Sox Top 20 for 2011
1) Anthony Ranaudo, RHP, Grade B: Could rise a notch or two if he proves fully healthy in pro ball.
2) Drake Britton, LHP, Grade B: Could also rise a notch or two if he handles increased workload well.
3) Jose Iglesias, SS, Grade B: Won't have much fantasy value, but in real baseball he will hold a job for a long time due to his glove and line drive hitting.
4) Josh Reddick, OF, Grade B-: Power potential remains, but plate discipline is a big issue.
5) Stolmy Pimentel, RHP, Grade B-: Projects as a solid number three starter for me.
6) Garin Cecchini, 3B, Grade B-: Grade could/should rise once we get some pro data to make sure he's as good as the scouting reports.
7) Oscar Tejeda, 2B, Grade B-: I think the breakout is real.
8) Brandon Workman, RHP, Grade B-: Future workhorse starter.
9) Ryan Lavarnway, C, Grade B-: The power is legit, defense not great but not awful if he hits enough.
10) Kolbrin Vitek, 3B, Grade B-: Defense needs a lot of work, but I think the bat will be fine.
11) Chris Balcom-Miller, RHP, Grade B-: One of the best-kept secrets in the minor leagues and my pick for a big breakout in '11.
12) Felix Doubront, LHP, Grade C+: Borderline B-, a useful lefty arm that can start or relieve.
13) Michael Bowden, RHP, Grade C+: Another flexible pitcher who can start or relieve and is ready now.
14) Will Middlebrooks, 3B, Grade C+: Glove is very strong, offense is gradually improving but plate discipline will be tested in Double-A.
15) Yamaico Navarro, INF, Grade C+: Looks like he can be a fine backup infielder to me right now with a chance to still develop beyond that.
16) Luis Exposito, C, Grade C+: Should reach the majors later this year. No outstanding attributes, but a catcher with some power will stick around awhile.
17) Lars Anderson, 1B, Grade C+: Blocked now, will go back to Pawtucket, see if he can get hot enough to interest someone in a trade. Disappointing, but could still develop into useful platoon bat.
18) Kyle Weiland, RHP, Grade C+: Strike-throwing inning-eater type.
19) Sean Coyle, 2B, Grade C+: Interesting high school bat from '10 class.
20) Henry Ramos, OF, Grade C+: Another sleeper prospect, '10 draft pick from Puerto Rico looked great in rookie ball.
OTHERS OF NOTE: Xander Bogaerts, SS; Bryce Brentz, OF; Keury De La Cruz, OF; Tim Federowicz, C; Alex Hassan, OF; Jeremy Hazelbaker, OF; Chris Hernandez, LHP; Pete Hissey, OF; Brandon Jacobs, OF; Che-Hsuan Lin, OF; Juan Carlos Linares, OF; Kendrick Perkins, OF; Mathew Price, RHP; Jason Rice, RHP; Manuel Rivera, LHP; Pete Ruiz, RHP; Kendal Volz, RHP; Alex Wilson, RHP; Madison Younginer, RHP.
The Adrian Gonzalez trade ripped the top off this system, leaving no current B+ or A- prospects, although both Ranaudo and Britton can get to that level in 2011 if all goes well. Iglesias will be a regular due to his glove eventually, although if you are looking in pure fantasy terms his value won't be that great. Reddick looks destined to become trade bait to me unless a rash of injuries hits in spring training. It wouldn't surprise me to see the same thing happen to Lavarnway, although he is a favorite of Red Sox fans. Cecchini, Workman, Vitek, and Balcom-Miller are all B- types with a good chance to raise their grades.
All told, the system has thinned out but there is raw material percolating that could make it look much better a year from now. The Sox have shown they will invest loads of money in the farm system, and I don't doubt their ability to recharge quickly.
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Iglesias
I agree, he will have a career because of his glove, but at this point, I don’t see much value for fantasy owners except a nice BA.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.sbnation.com
www.minorleagueball.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 27, 2025 12:22 PM EST reply actions
I guess I see a little differently
I could see an Omar Vizquel fantasy career out of him. The type of guy that gives you solid steals and a good-enough average not to hurt you, and who is available typically toward the end of your draft so you can load up at other positions and cover for the lack of other counting stats. I’ve also read good things about Iglesias’s bunting ability, which could make him a 2-hole candidate, and in Boston, that will likely translate to a solid number of runs as well.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
by biggentleben on Dec 27, 2025 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
I'm more to this side, in that I think the lack of fantasy value is probably overstated.
There were like… 3 half decent SSs in the AL this year. If Iglesias is a true talent .290-.300 hitter in the Red Sox lineup he’s already no worse than a middle of the road option at SS. Handful of steal, High AVG, decent R & RBI numbers for a SS, in a park that would help with HRs slightly… that’s a guy who will always be owned
Jeff Gross over at THT had a recent article projecting the top 20 SS fantasy options for 2011. Here’s his top 20 (with their OLIVER projected slash stats):
Rank Name Team Oliver Slash (2011)
1 Hanley Ramirez Marlins .307/.383/.518
2 Troy Tulowitzki Rockies .275/.354/.488
3 Jose Reyes Mets .278/.330/.426
4 Derek Jeter Yankees .278/.344/.376
5 Alexei Ramirez White Sox .272/.311/.399
6 Jimmy Rollins Phillies .239/.301/.377
7 Stephen Drew Diamondbacks .261/.324/.427
8 Asdrubal Cabrera Indians .281/.339/.390
9 Starlin Castro Cubs .303/.342/.420
10 Rafael Furcal Dodgers .275/.344/.399
11 Elvis Andrus Rangers .277/.344/.352
12 Mike Aviles Royals .276/.307/.398
13 Danny Espinosa Nationals .241/.312/.403
14 Ian Desmond Nationals .261/.312/.399
15 Erick Aybar Angels .267/.314/.358
16 Cliff Pennington Athletics .237/.322/.328
17 Miguel Tejada Giants .268/.302/.378
18 Alcides Escobar Royals .267/.310/.357
19 J.J. Hardy Orioles .251/.313/.395
20 Jhonny Peralta Tigers .256/.315/.408
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/top-20-fantasy-shortstops-for-2011/
Really not hard at all for me to see Iglesias sitting in the 10-15 range, surrounded by worse hitters with higher SB totals.
…but yes, you aren’t going to hit a fantasy HR with Iglesias. He just strikes me as a guy who will probably end up a middle of the road fantasy SS a lot. Some upside here, too.
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Dec 27, 2025 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
I assume...
Avilies will be the Royals starting 2B (with SS eligibility) and Alcides Escobar at SS.
Also, Toronto’s Yunel Escobar I think could easily be in the top 10 if he plays to his ability.
by Havok1517 on Dec 27, 2025 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
Yunel
….should be a year-in, year-out All-Star by now. There’s a reason the Braves let him go.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
by biggentleben on Dec 27, 2025 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
I'll take Yunel..
over Gonzalez for the future any day.
by Havok1517 on Dec 27, 2025 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
Of course
But the Braves were willing to take the downgrade in order to just get rid of Yunel and his lack of hustle and care for the game. I truly hope he gets past that and turns into a great player, but he was a lot of talent wasted in Atlanta.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
by biggentleben on Dec 27, 2025 8:11 PM EST up reply actions
Tejeda
I’m excited to see how much he can move in 2011. I’m hoping he can improve his ranking to a B+. Could be a very solid IF prospect going into next year and hopefully he sticks at 2nd where for fantasy purposes I think he will have the most value!!!
by srbaseball2003 on Dec 27, 2025 12:39 PM EST reply actions
Can’t quantify things terribly at this time, but it seems to me you were just about a half grade harder on this system than many I’ve seen. I actually think this is more accurate, but not in line with how other systems have received grades..
I don’t see, for example, how Chad Bettis is a B but ahead of a number of these B- prospects, or in line with Ranaudo, Iglesias, etc.
by WrenFGun on Dec 27, 2025 12:54 PM EST reply actions
Jose Iglesias
Iglesias showed solid offensive numbers in both A and AA ball this year. Hes never going to be a burner on the basepaths, maybe 10-20 SB/year but if he can maintain a .280+ Avg and a solid OBP he should be an average to above average fantasy SS option. Based on the numbers I have seen so far, I can see him putting up a line of 85/5/60/16 .285 pretty easily. Not to mention he is still very young, and by all accounts a quick learner. I think his stats from next year in AA/AAA should silence some of the doubters.
by Mr. Homerun on Dec 27, 2025 1:12 PM EST reply actions
Not sure about a solid OBP
I think whether he can maintain a solid OBP is one of the question marks for me there. He only had a .315 OBP in AA, despite hitting .285, due to walking in only 3.4% of PA. The walk rate was better in a very small sample in Lowell, but still only 5.2% on the season. In two season in the AFL now, he has only walked 6 times in 139 AB. And even back in Cuba as an 18 year old he only walked in 5% of PA.
He is young enough that I think that should improve, but he has yet to demonstrate a proven ability to walk in over 5% of PA. And while he has shown an ability to hit for average, that has also come with high strikeout rates considering his limited power (and with extra base hits having been as scarce as walks). Given his age, these aren’t the serious red flags they would be if he were two years older, but it’s enough uncertainty for me to doubt for now how high his ceiling will really be.
He also has a pretty small frame, so I’m not quite sure how good the offensive upside really is there. He is toolsy enough, and talented enough, that I think he could break out some next year. But I don’t see the argument yet for a B+ (as someone argues for below). If the plate discipline and power doesn’t improve given another year to mature and adjust to upper level pitching, then I think he could end up looking more like a good defensive backup than a solid future starter. I actually might have had him a B- for now, though I expect him to be a B after this year.
But maybe he will surprise me given how quickly he’s adjusted so far.
by acerimusdux on Dec 27, 2025 5:57 PM EST up reply actions
Westmoreland
Is he just not even considered anymore?
by Galt on Dec 27, 2025 1:51 PM EST reply actions
That's my question
Was he considered, but not listed in the top 40 or so names, or is his chance of recovery considered so remote that he’s not even discussed as a prospect anymore?
by Galt on Dec 27, 2025 2:20 PM EST up reply actions
He will be back next season
but it’s hard to rank him before he plays again.
Before the surgery, he was ranked second I recall. Looking at the system now, if he healthy he would be first.
by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 27, 2025 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
Fairly obvious?
Isn’t he the quintessential “I” for “incomplete?” What other grade could he possibly have after not playing a year for health reasons?
I think it’s understood that he had tremendous potential before last spring, but just to see him put on a uniform and get onto a ball field would make him a huge success in life, and that makes him worth rooting for. I’m not sure how anyone would begin to try and put a letter or number grade on what his future would be, based on his track record.
by AGuinness on Dec 27, 2025 3:01 PM EST up reply actions
I don't like Bowden there.
And I think Reddick is a bit high. I’d have Lavarnway over him. I’d also have Coyle over Anderson.
by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 27, 2025 2:10 PM EST reply actions
How badly did Bryce Brentz look this year?
I had him pegged as a guy that would exceed expectations, but by all accounts, he probably struggled worse than any other first round/sandwich pick.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 27, 2025 3:18 PM EST reply actions
No love for Lin?
I understand I’m in the minority given the extreme power reservations but still I’m a little disappointed Che-Hsuan Lin missed out on this list given the weakened state of the system. That defense/plate discipline combination plus his yearly improvements and strong second-half in Portland has me very intrigued. How much power development is really necessary if you’re that good at getting on base while playing a key position?
by eriatarka on Dec 27, 2025 3:47 PM EST reply actions
it's really hard to get on base if you don't have any power at all
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Dec 27, 2025 4:36 PM EST up reply actions
Someone should tell that to Brett Gardner
Denard Span had some pretty sick OBPs despite not popping a .100+ IsoP until the majors. Michael Bourn also managed to walk almost 10% of the time last year despite having roughly the same power as me.
What you say is the conventional wisdom but by no means a hard and fast rule. Strikezone discipline doesn’t typically disappear and at 22, he has plenty of time to develop mediocre power. Hell, even if he can only manage a .100-110 like he did in the lower levels, if he can manage a better average with improved contact skills, his OBP at that point would likely be plenty respectable for a plus CF.
by eriatarka on Dec 27, 2025 7:24 PM EST up reply actions
i knew those guys would be brought up
exceptions. not the rule. i guess if you’re willing to bet on a long shot, go for it.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
by doublestix on Dec 27, 2025 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
I'd take him 10 times of 10 over Michael Bowden
There is precedent for what he’s doing and key to him, I’d say, is that every year, he’s climbed the ladder and every year, he has improved his skills while doing it. What a player can’t presently do and what a player can’t learn to do are different things so as a gamble, I do like what Lin brings to the table.
by eriatarka on Dec 27, 2025 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
Lars, and Depth
Take it with at least a slight grain of salt, but according to Clay Davenport’s Peak Translations, Lars Anderson was the 8th best hitting prospect in the minors — the 34th best position prospect after adjusting for position. He’s also turned himself into a very good defender. I came late to the Lars vs. Brandon Allen smackdown, but they essentially had the same year after adjusting for league and park (Allen just a tad better), and Lars was two years younger.
Some fun facts as to why the system is so deep: starting from 2006, the number of players per year the Sox have given at least third round money to (based on MLB slotting recommendations and including international signings) has gone 12, 9, 11, 12, 12. In the system right now there are currently 11 guys who got first round money, 11 who got supplemental first money, 11 who got second round money, and 14 who got third round money. I’m guessing the total (47) is about double most teams.
by emvan on Dec 27, 2025 4:18 PM EST reply actions
He'll likely his chance at DH/1B...
when Ortiz is done.
by Havok1517 on Dec 27, 2025 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
Calling Theo
the Nats are on the line offering Chris Marrero for Lars Anderson, if not what else?
by 3b11 on Dec 28, 2025 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
double?
I’d guess it’s more than that. They’ve spent a staggering amount of money on the draft. With the strong chance of hard slotting in 2012, I wouldn’t be surprised if they go all out in the 2011 draft.
Really, the more I think about it, the angrier I get at MLB’s ridiculous system that only serves to strengthen large market teams over time.
by mrkupe on Dec 28, 2025 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
Allowing teams...
to trade picks would help even that some imo.
by Havok1517 on Dec 28, 2025 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
no, it wouldn't
Since trades can include cash, there’s more than a few teams out there that would gladly sell off a pick or a number of picks.
by mrkupe on Dec 28, 2025 6:27 PM EST up reply actions
However
“Netting out” compensation picks would certainly help. The fact that the Red Sox signed two Type A guys last offseason and still had three of the top 39 picks in the 2010 draft is a sign that it’s not working. If you sign two and lose two guys, that should net out to ZERO comp picks.
by realitypolice on Dec 28, 2025 9:02 PM EST up reply actions
MLB’s ridiculous system that only serves to strengthen large market teams over time.
I don’t think it’s just slotting that’s accomplishing that. The problem is that BOS can afford to exceed slot and go sign Crawford/A-Gon in the off season. Any team who wants to can exceed slot. It’s my opinion that many owners actually like the excuse to not spend the money in the draft.
by blackoutyears on Dec 29, 2025 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
Kalish
What would Ryan Kalish’s grade be if he were still eligible?
by Randolph314 on Dec 27, 2025 4:56 PM EST reply actions
Kalish
John,
I’m surprised you’d still have Kalish as a B since I think you gave him a B in last season’s list, and he had an outstanding 2010 minor-league season & solid major-league debut.
Do you see Kalish becoming (assuming everything continues to go well) something close to Shin-Soo Choo Part 2?
by The Laser Show on Dec 27, 2025 5:07 PM EST up reply actions
Ditto
I was thinking at least a B+, and I wouldn’t have been surprised by an A-. No weaknesses in his game; good plate approach, improving power, excellent base runner, capable of handling CF…he’s a more advanced Brett Jackson. Heck, he’s only 6 months older than Jackson but Kalish has already proven himself capable of holding his own at the MLB level whereas Jackson couldn’t even match Kalish’s AA performance. I can’t be the only one who’d definitely prefer Kalish over Jackson, can I?
Now writing for BaseballInstinct.com
by Franchise887 on Dec 27, 2025 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
You can
.. a cursory glace at the numbers shows Kalish exceesding Jackson in his SECOND go-round in AA . . . and being inferior to him in his age 21 season. Maybe give Jackson a chance to play some AA next season before reaching that conclusion?
"If my uniform doesn't get dirty, I haven't done anything in the baseball game." - Rickey Henderson
by casejud on Dec 28, 2025 12:27 AM EST up reply actions
+1
This was Kalish’s 4th full minor league season, his 5th overall. This was Jackson’s first full minor league season. The statistical results aren’t very comparable.
by mrkupe on Dec 28, 2025 2:19 AM EST up reply actions
I'm not saying I don't agree, but Kalish did lose a lot of time to hamate & wrist injuries.
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Dec 28, 2025 2:20 AM EST up reply actions
thiat is true, yes
It’s something I account for, but despite the injuries, Kalish has still played in more games than Jackson since HS and Kalish has had the benefit of more formalized training (spring training + instructionals). Then you have to also consider the adjustments that every amateur has to make in transitioning to the pro game . . .I just don’t see how anybody can act like Jackson being in AA in his first full year is at all comparable to Kalish getting a second go in his 4th full year. Players with Jackson’s profile sometimes don’t even get to AA until their third full year out of college.
I think Grade B is perfectly acceptable for Kalish. That’s a player who projects as a solid regular. I wouldn’t put it past him to play up beyond that, especially given his work ethic, but at the same time playing well in the minors off of effort and doing the same in the majors are two very different things. He doesn’t have nearly as much of a talent gap to make up against quality arms in the minors. I do think, however, that Kalish could be a very interesting player to watch in his years of peak physical ability, maybe something of a Youkilis situation.
by mrkupe on Dec 28, 2025 9:13 AM EST up reply actions
I really like Jackson - and again, not sure I disagree with you about Kalish at all (even the grade)
but it does bear mentioning he was considered very toolsy when he was drafted. A sort of power/speed guy, but with a great approach at the plate. He’s not some… middling athletic talent making the most of his tools (ie Youkilis… to some degree). When you watch him its apparent the guy is pretty toolsy.
Here’s a few highlights (I really do think he can play a good CF, too, fwiw. Very impressed overall by him):
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=12500137
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=12500479
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=12311455
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=12048001
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=11936405
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Dec 28, 2025 2:04 PM EST up reply actions
One other thing that confuses me...
When the Brett Jackson vs. Kalish head to head was posted, Kalish won the popular vote slightly, and even John said he’d have trouble choosing. That was before Kalish had even hit the MLB and held his own. Basically, if we’re going to run out the “Jackson has less experience/lets wait and see how he does next year/etc” argument, then shouldn’t the fact Kalish has already proven himself at those levels actually be a positive for him, instead of being held against him? Hell, Kalish’s “inferior” year in AA, he showed marked improvement each month in AA, to the point that his final two months there had some people noting that his numbers compared favorably to Domonic Brown’s.
Now writing for BaseballInstinct.com
by Franchise887 on Dec 28, 2025 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
I tend to agree
I can buy that Brett Jackson’s defense gives him the edge, but I have a hard time seeing Kalish as a grade below him. When people say that BOS prospects are continually overrated, Kalish always jumps out me as the glaring exception. After he injured his hamate bone, it seemed as if the scouting community became highly skeptical of him for some reason.
Ryan Kalish, It’s the “tweener” ya love to hate.
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by Jeff Reese on Dec 28, 2025 8:27 PM EST up reply actions
Kind of off-topic...
But I think the “tweener” thing may finally, mercifully be dying. Why it took so long for analysts to realize that a guy who is only a marginal defensive CF may be a very good defensive corner OF, and that that defensive value could make up for some lack of power, I have no idea. So…thank you Carl Crawford for proving you don’t have to hit 30 HRs annually to be an elite corner outfielder?
Now writing for BaseballInstinct.com
by Franchise887 on Dec 28, 2025 8:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't know, it still gets used fairly often
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by Jeff Reese on Dec 28, 2025 9:18 PM EST up reply actions
Dying...
But certainly not dead.
Now writing for BaseballInstinct.com
by Franchise887 on Dec 28, 2025 10:20 PM EST up reply actions
you forgot this one alskor
http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=11469235
He wont play CF because he will be playing RF when Drew leaves but he does provide great flexibility and can cover CF in case of injury
by Jimothy on Jan 1, 2026 6:14 PM EST up reply actions
Alskor's got it...
Kalish has always been known to be a very toolsy player. I remember KG in particular was extremely high on Kalish after his brief play in 2007 (actually this is a good time to mention that two of Kalish’s “minor league seasons” comprised a total of 148 ABs).
Again, it makes no sense to say that Jackson should be preferred because he’s only had one stint in AA, and he might get better. Kalish ALREADY has gotten better, and has already proven himself capable of playing at the MLB level. Why the AA point (as opposed to the actual meat of the post regarding Kalish’s strengths) is being so stressed is beyond me…unless its just that its the only thing people see that they can quibble with, so they’re trying to build it into a strawman?
One last thing…could you give some examples of college hitters who were drafted in the first round who failed to get to AA until their third full pro year and were still very highly regarded? It’s possible that you’re right, but that….really doesn’t sound right.
Now writing for BaseballInstinct.com
by Franchise887 on Dec 28, 2025 8:26 PM EST up reply actions
I'd argue "very toolsy"
If he was still that toolsy, it’d show up in better evaluations. A player can be toolsy and yet not blow somebody away with those tools . . .having even major league average tools across the board is very impressive.
Jackson was impressive in AA last year. Sure Kalish was better, but these are obviously very different circumstances for each player. Given the perception (fair or not) that Jackson has more upside, the fact that Jackson appears to be farther along than expected in realizing that upside has to be encouraging. I’ll also caution against assuming “better in AA in 2010” = “better in MLB in 2013”.
I’m not sure why you’re putting the condition of the players in question having to be drafted in the first round. In this case, you’re actually implying that a player’s pedigree should count against them, which I disagree with. So I’m going to list players from all rounds, who made good in the end. When I said “profile”, I meant “talented, but need work/experience against quality competition”.
Here’s five guys who fit the criteria, and have had careers of substantial impact (I won’t insult your intelligence and throw out a bunch of lesser players/role players who might qualify):
Drew Stubbs (1st)
Ryan Howard (5th)
Kevin Kouzmanoff (save a 8 game stint in his first full year, 6th)
Casey Blake (7th)
Brad Hawpe (11th)
I only listed 5 guys, but 5 guys who have carved out good looking careers. And obviously if you want to expand this to players who reached AA in their second full season (or a full season ahead of Jackson), the list blows up with future impact players and regulars. Anyways, we are getting off the point and discussing things that don’t actually pertain to either of the players being discussed here.
by mrkupe on Dec 29, 2025 2:07 AM EST up reply actions
Doubront
I love the list, and I think it speaks to the depth of the system (despite the lack of top-tier prospects). My only quibble would probably be Doubront’s ranking. Seems like his floor at this point is high enough that I can easily see him as a solid B- somewhere in the 5-6 range on this list.
I think he’ll have a pretty solid role with the Red Sox in 2011 out of the bullpen and/or in the rotation when DiceK or Beckett go down.
by The Laser Show on Dec 27, 2025 5:19 PM EST reply actions
I agree with that. Doubront looks like a very solid #4/swingman type, maybe with Chris Capuano upside.
by limozeen on Dec 27, 2025 9:49 PM EST up reply actions
Lavarnway
That’s probably the best non-Sox affiliated report on Lavarnway’s defense I’ve heard. Any sense as to whether his defense can continue to improve (as his late start as a catcher suggests), or whether he’s just physically not a catcher (as Keith Law seemed to suggest in his podcast interview with Alex Speier)?
"Laser show. So relax."
"For the Patriots [playing the Jets], it was like fighting Piston Honda knowing that every time he raises an eyebrow, he's about to throw a jab."
by nuthinboutnuthin on Dec 27, 2025 6:26 PM EST reply actions
Whither Dan Butler?
He seemingly came out of nowhere, but had a decent year.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Dec 27, 2025 9:26 PM EST reply actions
Too old
A great statistical year but given how much older he was than the competition, it’s hard to take much away from it. There’s too much depth in the system for him to sniff the top 20 unless whoever is making the list is related to him. If he continues to produce next year though, he could see a promotion to AA and that’ll get him taken a little more seriously.
by eriatarka on Dec 27, 2025 9:39 PM EST up reply actions
The Main Guys Not Mentioned
Based on my own rankings (which are informed by Davenport Peak Translations for hitters and my own pitching metrics and level adjustments for pitchers) and SoxProspects’, there are nine guys whose omission from the OTHERS OF NOTE is noticeable. In rough order:
Junichi Tazawa
Jose Vinicio*
Adalberto Ibarra
Stephen Fife
Robert Coello
David Renfroe
Michael Almanzar
Daniel Butler
Derek Gibson**
*When a Dominican SS signs for a $1.95M bonus and then plays in the GCL at age 16 and is the fourth best offensive SS in the league (.253 / .290 / .373, 13 SB / 1 CS) while showing plus defensive tools, and can’t crack a system’s top 39, you know you have a deep system. (Or that the guy doing the rankings inexplicably omitted him. :)
**When a guy who was BA’s #10 has a bad year and falls all the way to 48 or 49 (I’d have to put Westmoreland in there somewhere), you know you have a deep system, too.
by emvan on Dec 30, 2025 12:12 AM EST reply actions
Gibson
has almost zero power, and I know I felt that BA was a little high on him. I love the on-base ability, but he’s getting written up as a 2B long term and doesn’t have the bat for it at this point. And it’s Derrik. I see no reason why Tazawa s/b anywhere near a BOS top prospect list considering the TJ. I do like Fife based on scouting reports and could see him as an HM. Vinicio too.
by blackoutyears on Jan 1, 2026 6:15 PM EST up reply actions
One guy I've been following is Yunior Ortega
I just can’t get any decent info on him, or why he was stuck in the DSL for a second straight year.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Dec 31, 2025 8:22 PM EST reply actions

by John Sickels on 











