New York Mets Preliminary Prospect List
Preliminary Mets prospect list after the jump.
Feel free to suggest additions, but any addition has to be accompanied by a suggested cut.
New York Mets 38 players
Kyle Allen RHP
Eric Beaulac RHP
Shawn Bowman 3B
Robert Carson LHP
Ike Davis 1B
Zach Dotson LHP
Lucas Duda 1B
Jeurys Familia RHP
Wilmer Flores SS
Jim Fuller LHP
Chase Greene OF
Ronald Harris OF
Reese Havens SS
Brad Holt RHP
Richard Lucas 3B
Zach Lutz 3B
Brahaim Maldonado OF
Jefry Marte 3B
Fernando Martinez OF
Steve Matz LHP
Jenrry Mejia RHP
Roy Merritt LHP
Scott Moviel RHP
Jon Niese LHP
Kirk Nieuwenhuis OF
Cesar Puello OF
Sean Ratliff OF
Aderlin Rodriguez 3B
Armando Rodriguez RHP
Brent Rustich RHP
Nick Santomauro OF
Josh Satin 2B
Scott Shaw RHP
Josh Stinson RHP
Robbie Shields SS
Ruben Tejada INF
Josh Thole C
Juan Urbina LHP
0 recs |
66 comments
Comments
Is Robbie Shields worth writing about?
With his Tommy John surgery I mean.
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
Current 2010 Draft Order
by Andy Seiler on Jan 6, 2026 10:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yeah
Yeah i think so given his draft position. unless there is someone clearly more important.
by John Sickels on Jan 6, 2026 10:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah, no one.
I was just wondering, since he probably won’t even make any meaningful appearance before your next book comes out. You can add another Ranger instead!
MLB Bonus Baby - A Draft Blog
Current 2010 Draft Order
by Andy Seiler on Jan 6, 2026 10:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Neifi Zapata looks pretty projectable.
He has a really nice swing, is a catcher, etc.
I think it’s safe to say you could drop Ronald Harris, Nick Santomauro, or Chase Green, and I wouldn’t notice.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jan 6, 2026 10:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Why would you take out Santomauro and Green?
Seem like some guys with a couple of tools from the recent draft
by Pelferized on Jan 6, 2026 11:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Greene
Green could turn out to be a good pick. Signed for about $150k, apparently a real burner. Far away though.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 2:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I really like Santomauro.
I don’t know much about what scouts think, but going purely on the numbers he looks like he could become a pretty decent prospect. In his small sample in Brooklyn, he had a .200 ISO, with 66 homers, and walked 28 times in 175 plate appearances. He struck out a lot, but he’s pretty big at 6’3, 205 pounds and looks like he could hit for good power. He’ll probably be in Savannah next season, so we’ll at least get to hear what Mike Newman at Scouting the Sally thinks.
I really need to start going to some Cyclones games.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 6:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I watched him in Brooklyn a little
very athletic guy
by Pelferized on Jan 7, 2026 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
66 homers in 175 PA!
man, he should be getting way more press.
David Eckstein: so gritty they would eat him in the south for breakfast with some butter and sprinkle cheese.
by wrightHOF on Jan 7, 2026 3:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know right!
I really wish SBNation had an edit button somewhere. It’s really supposed to be 666 homers in 175 plate appearances, sorry for the mix up. Hitting multiple home runs in a single plate appearance should be enough to get him on the Mets top 40 I think.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 7:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It was a joke
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 8, 2026 5:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was joking as well
“Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666.” Rev. 13:18
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 11:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd drop both
More like OK tools. Santomauro will probably end up in LF, not quite enough speed for CF, or arm for RF. He’s a 10th rounder from Dartmouth, signed for $82k. Sounds like an organizational guy to me.
Greene on the other hand is a burner with some potential, but I’m not sure how he ranks over Ceciliani, who is 2 months younger, was the higher pick, higher bonus, has about the same speed, is more polished and played at the higher level, and is a bigger kid with a bit more projection.
And I’m not really arguing for Ceciliani, either. I like Niesen, Guzman, Gee, Pena, or Carr over all these guys.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 7:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on Niesen, Gee, Carr and Guzman
but Pena just looks like a bust. He’s still young enough to pan out, but he’s done nothing in 3 seasons.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 7:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
Pena was only 19 this year. His .688 OPS last year in low A ranked him as one of the best hitting 18 year olds in the minors that season. There’s only a handful of guys who do better at that age. Josh Vitters is the same age and hit about the same in the FSL this year as Pena, is he still a prospect? Heck, Ruben Tejada was only a year younger when he had a .588 OPS in this league, was he a bust? Pena will have similar positional value, and if he does improve his approach, a higher offensive ceiling because he’s got some power.
These other guys we’re discussing down in the rookie leagues are about the same age. Jeff Greene is only 6 months younger and he’s playing down in the GCL. Nelfi Zapata is only a year younger and far less accomplished. Do people not understand the huge jump in talent level from rookie ball to high-A?
I agree the lack of progress has been disappointing, considering what expectations might have been, but he’s still easily in the top 25 here for me. He looks like a good bet to stay at catcher, with an above average arm. And the flaws in his plate approach aren’t that different from a guy like Maldonado, who is 4 years older at the same level with much less positional value. Pena is still young enough to correct some of that, and even if he doesn’t that bat might still have some value at catcher. He may have been over rated in the past, but he still easily has more potential than most of the guys we’re debating for the last few spots here.
I honestly wasn’t going to even bother debating Pena, since John’s report will probably just end up saying “Pena sucks”. So might as well have him write someone else up. :)
Plus, I don’t think he’ll bust out huge in one year, so he can probably wait and see and rank him next year if he earns it. So I was focusing more on Niesen and Guzman because those are guys who I think could be pretty big misses in 2010. But if it were my list, Pena would be there for sure.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 8:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You make a convincing argument
He is certainly very young and never really had a chance to succeed, being rushed from the beginning. Hopefully he can make some strides next season and show why the Yankees were dumb for signing Montero over him!!! Okay, that’s not gonna happen, but you’ve convinced me enough to to write him off just yet. He still needs to show some substantial progress offensively next season. I’d at least be a bit more encouraged had his walk rate improved a little, instead of dropping from 6.1% to 5.9% to 3.7% this season.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 10:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Viva Zapata!
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 2:45 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
John
I think Eric Niesen belongs on this list over Josh Satin. Satin is 25 years old with 22 career ab’s above A-ball with the Mets saying his glove isn’t strong enough to be a regular at any position. Niesen on the other hand is a lefty with a plus breaking ball, low 90’s fb, has “high draft pick” pedigree and had a strong year going 140.2 innings 127 hits 57 walks 134 k’s in the FSL and then AA. At AA his numbers can be deceiving as he started very slow his first 2 starts yet still struck out 85 in 83 innings. As I said Niesen’s first 2 AA starts were putrid (9 innings 11 hits 12 er 7 walks and 7 k’s) but he really came on with his final 8 starts going 46 innings 33 hits 45 k’s allowing only 1 hr during that time) he also struck out 8 or more 4 times at AA
by Peter North on Jan 6, 2026 11:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The few videos I've seen of Niesen showed crazy movemnt on his pitches
He may turn out to be no more than a LOOGY, but he could very well be the best LOOGY in baseball. Not to mention, I like the idea of having two guys whose name start with the letters “Niese,” and three who start with “Nie.”
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 2:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Niesen would come in to relieve Niese who would get the batter to fly out to Nieuwenhuis.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 6:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was thinking Nieve
I thought you meant the three pitchers.
“We the Knights whose names say Nie, will not allow you to score! Unless you bring us a shrubbery!”
Hey, that could be the Buffalo rotation there.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 6:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That would actually make much more sense,
but I don’t see Nieve being good enough to be more than a minor league option for the big club.
The Mets lobby Omar for a plan, and his plan, he likes his plan. The problem is that he didn't write his plan down 'cause that makes it paperwork, and that’s false hustle... Know what I’m sayin’?
by Evan_S on Jan 7, 2026 6:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Agreed, that’s an obvious flip to me. Niesen deserves Top 20 consideration and Satin probably doesn’t even belong in this group.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 7, 2026 11:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I remember when Satin was drafted John was high on him and believe took him in his shadow draft so he probably isn’t going to give up on him just yet
by Pelferized on Jan 7, 2026 1:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Alonzo Harris, Nelfi Zapata, Richie Lucas, Carlos Guzman
I think C Nelfi Zapata and 3B Richie Lucas both deserve in. I would rate Lucas right there with Zach Lutz, though Lucas has been limited by injuries and almost quit baseball. And I think of Zapata as a young Pablo Sandoval, when he was a catcher, but I’m not going to compare the two that directly. Similar game.
Next, you have the wrong “Harris,” in my opinion. Ronald Harris can hit a little and has some speed, but I like the bat of Alonzo Harris better.
If you want to look at similar players, you should most certainly include Carlos Guzman over Brahiam Maldonado. The two put up similar numbers at St. Lucie, but Guzman strikes out less with far fewer professional ABs. Also, the Mets gave Guzman a promotion to AA at the end of the season, while they left Maldonado at High A. While neither would be anything but a “C” prospect, I think Guzman’s bat will turn out better, though Maldonado’s the better athlete.
by Rocks on Jan 6, 2026 11:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dillon Gee
He’s on the verge of a major-league call-up, and would have had he not been hurt most of the season. In terms of near-major-league-ready starting pitching, the Mets have him and Jon Niese.
by Rocks on Jan 7, 2026 12:00 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
+1
he should be a solid back end guy if hes healthy now
by jarjets89 on Jan 7, 2026 4:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Jordany Valdespin
He seems perpetually in trouble with the Mets organization, as they’ve suspended him and held him at low levels at an advanced age. He’s a middle infielder with pop and some patience. He’s worth a few sentences.
www.twitter.com/willDavidian
by All Shook Down on Jan 7, 2026 12:46 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Maldanodo doesn't belong
Maldonado is kind of a typical minor league slugger. Struck out 126 times. Not good in the field. Approach won’t work at higher levels. Carlos Guzman at the same level has much more potential.
And Eric Niesen is probably the biggest omission, unless there’s an injury there I don’t know about (which there may be given the velocity drop in the AFL).
The other guy I’d probably cut there would be Ronald Harris. I dont’ know, 14th round 22 year old, college senior, spends most of the season in Kingsport? You might know something I don’t here. I certainly don’t remember that one standing out on draft day!
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 2:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Harris confused me a bit too
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 7, 2026 12:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yes
Supposedly he does have good tools, so maybe a sleeper type. But I’d wait until he makes some noise in full season ball.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 12:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryota Igarashi
Not sure whether or not you typically rank first year players from Japan, but if so, Ryota Igarashi should be on this list. He’s apparently got a mid-90s fastball and is expected to compete for the Mets set-up man job this year. Keith Law had him ranked as the #25 best free agent this offseason ahead of Hideki Matsui, Adrian Beltre, Erik Bedard, and Adam LaRoche among others. Also, I’d like to see Dillon Gee as someone else mentioned. Before his injury last season, he was probably in the top 15 - 20 in the system. I don’t think the injury should drop him out of the top 40. I’d drop Zach Dotson, Chase Greene, or Ronald Harris
by LanceAW on Jan 7, 2026 5:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Junichi Tazawa got ranked
and thus there’s a case for Igarashi to be ranked.
"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West
by Blicks on Jan 7, 2026 9:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Tazawa never played professionally in Japan
Tazawa didn’t play professionally in Japan. Igarashi did. I don’t know of any other distinction between the two situations, though, to determine whether or not they are eligible to be considered “prospects”. If you’re going by rookie eligibility, Igarashi is eligible, but I know some people don’t like to call players with professional experience in Japan “prospects”.
by LanceAW on Jan 7, 2026 10:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what about Mike Anotinini, Dillon Gee and Dylon Owen?
I believe Gee got hurt, but what about the other guys?
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
by feslenraster on Jan 7, 2026 8:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Owen, Antonini
I like Gee over both of the other two. Neither Owen nor Antonini has proven much above high-A ball, while Gee has had limited success in the upper minors.
by Rocks on Jan 7, 2026 9:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Antonini
He had a 3.69 FIP in AA, 4.56 FIP in AAA this year. The high BABIP is probably more than just bad luck, he still has work to do to get guys out at higher levels. The fastball isn’t better than average, and while the change up is good, the breaking ball still needs more work. He did get pushed pretty quickly to AAA though.
Without a better breaking ball though, he’s more a potential pen arm, and with the change his best pitch, he’s not a potential loogy either, as he’s arguably tougher on RHB (a dead even split, 3.83 FIP vs. each side this year).
Has a bit of a case still, especially as a lefty, but not really the most glaring omission either. I’d probably have him over Fuller or Merritt, though there’s not that much space between them all. I agree Gee is better.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 9:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Niesen
I agree with those who say Niesen should be on the list.
by wobatus on Jan 7, 2026 8:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Tobi Stoner
I think Tobi Stoner should be on the list. Had a decent year on a bad Buffalo team, and wasn’t awful in his cup of coffee with the Mets. More upside than some of the guys on this list, and a better chance of sticking in the majors than as much as half of this list. As I mentioned in my post about Igarashi, I would get rid of Dotson, Greene and Harris. I’d be fine with Maldonado being dropped as well.
by LanceAW on Jan 7, 2026 10:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Tobi
Of the pitchers, aside from Merritt and Stinson, who I think are strictly relievers without any late inning potential, and maybe Fuller, Stoner might have a lower ceiling than any on there. But he’s maybe the closest guy to being something useful. The very low swing and miss rate means ceiling is probably something like a Tim Redding #5 SP. But it seems the kid does know how to pitch.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 12:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ryota and Junichi
Good point by LanceAW, by MLB writers’ Point of View, Hideki Matsui didn’t even get a vote for ROY because he played in the Major Leagues of Japan for a long time. Junichi was a “real” rookie when he signed with the BoSox.
but I don’t care about that kind of stuff, Ryota is a rookie in the MLB in my mind, but I don’t think he’s good enough in general to be on the Mets top 20.
Oops, I meant Dylan Owen, not Dylon sorry for the misspelling! and I agree, I like Dillon Gee better than either Antonini, Owen but I figured I might throw those guys in the mix.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
by feslenraster on Jan 7, 2026 11:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
japan
My general policy for 12 years has been to NOT include Japanese imports if they have experience in Japan.
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2026 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
list
Logic says I should not include Josh Satin due to excessive age, but intuition says I should. Therefore he stays. Other adjustments include adding Gee, Guzman, and Niesen, dropping maldonado and Greene
Kyle Allen RHP
Eric Beaulac RHP
Shawn Bowman 3B
Robert Carson LHP
Ike Davis 1B
Zach Dotson LHP
Lucas Duda 1B
Jeurys Familia RHP
Wilmer Flores SS
Jim Fuller LHP
Dillon Gee RHP
Carlos Guzman OF
Reese Havens SS
Brad Holt RHP
Richard Lucas 3B
Zach Lutz 3B
Jefry Marte 3B
Fernando Martinez OF
Steve Matz LHP
Jenrry Mejia RHP
Roy Merritt LHP
Scott Moviel RHP
Jon Niese LHP
Eric Niesen LHP
Kirk Nieuwenhuis OF
Cesar Puello OF
Sean Ratliff OF
Aderlin Rodriguez 3B
Armando Rodriguez RHP
Brent Rustich RHP
Nick Santomauro OF
Josh Satin 2B
Scott Shaw RHP
Josh Stinson RHP
Robbie Shields SS
Ruben Tejada INF
Josh Thole C
Juan Urbina LHP
Nelfi Zapata C
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2026 11:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Gee, Guzman, and Niesen were the three big ones. Also like that you’re including Merritt. I know he probably won’t make the final cut, but lefties with funky deliveries always get a value boost no matter how limited their upside is.
The only other change that jumps out is maybe Stoner for Stinson. Neither has a great arm, but Stoner’s already made it to the upper levels as a starter. Stinson’s younger and was pretty solid at a younger age in full season and HiA, but I still think I’d take Stoner.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 7, 2026 12:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
stinson
I’d like to keep Stinson but I see the case for stoner as well.
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2026 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I was wrong
After doing a little research on Dotson, I now realize I was an idiot for suggesting that. Sorry.
by LanceAW on Jan 7, 2026 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
No worries. Dotson is one of only the guys from this recent draft who has top 20 potential so it would be silly to not include him.
by Pelferized on Jan 7, 2026 1:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sleeper pick?
John should maybe consider him as one of his sleeper guys, given how few really know him yet.
Problem with this system is not enough guys like Dotson.
I think the top 20 is very solid, but most of the guys we are debating now at the back end shouldn’t really even be candidates. But, I’m not coming up with a lot of guys who are obviously better.
On the pitching side at least, it’s hard to think of top 20 potential guys not on there already. Brandon Moore and Eduardo Aldamo both performed well in short season ball, but probably have #4 SP ceilings at best if all goes right. Nick Carr and Ryan Coultas are hard throwers who can hit mid-90s in a bullpen role, but both are coming off injuries. Coultas is rehabbing, but he’s also 28 next year.
As shallow as the pitching is here, Dotson could be in the top dozen pitching prospects before throwing his first pro game.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll second that
I haven’t been Stoner’s biggest fan, but for me, the best argument for Shaw is that he has an outside chance to be another Stoner. Stoner last year in St. Lucie had better stuff than Shaw this year. And better results. Stoner had a similar FIP in AAA this year to Shaw in St. Lucie. Neither guy throws very hard but Stoner had better secondary stuff.
And even with that, Shaw might be better than Stinson. Stinson looks like a RH specialist. Shaw arguably has a shot at a #5 SP.
I actually like this list pretty well as it is now. There are several guys I had different, but none missing now I was really passionate about (aside from Pena, who isn’t making it anyway), and none included I really dislike.
Merritt, Stinson, Shaw I could do without, and I’m sort of a skeptic on Zapata for now. But the guys I would include have arguably as many question marks.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Shaw's a little ahead of Stoner's path so far
He was more effective in the FSL and pitched the full season against the tougher competition. From what I understand his fastball is a bit better, and his size gives him more downward plane and perhaps even a bit of projection that Stoner didn’t have when he was 22, though time might be running out on that. If he can develop his secondary pitches, I think he has a bit more upside than #5 starter, but I definitely see what you’re saying.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jan 7, 2026 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough
Yeah I did a quick comparison with Stoner last year, but it’s a pretty good point that a more fair comparison might be with Stoner in 2007. And, he is supposed to maybe have some projection, and others have seen him with better velocity than I saw. I had him around 88-89, though, breaking ball OK, change pretty marginal.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How about Ceciliani?
Sort of on the bubble for me, but I thought the best upside guy left worth considering. A pre draft blurb here:
http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/draft/?p=672
He’s sort of similar to Chase Greene or Alonzo Harris, but a lefty with maybe a bit more upside. Was a JC pick, but still pretty young, born 6/90. Pick #134 of the draft. Only a .623 OPS in his first taste of pro ball, but weird split there:
OPS
.808 - July
.426 - August
He was flashing some real potential before going into the tank in August. At least that’s in Kingsport rather than the GCL.
Maybe over Merritt, or Zapata (though a lot of people do seem to like Zapata)?
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe even vs. Shields
Shields was a round earlier. It depends I guess on whether you think the TJ surgery lowers his stock much.
by acerimusdux on Jan 7, 2026 4:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not that I'm expecting him on the list...
I just wonder if Javier Rodriguez will ever make anything happen. I took a draft flier on him in a league…oops? haha
by BobbyS on Jan 7, 2026 12:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't see anyone he should replace, but Clint Everts is interesting
He hasn’t lived up to his draft pedigree, but his 2009 season shows he may finally be figuring things out. ERA under 2.00 and more than a K per inning. The Mets thought enough of him to give him a major league contract. He’s been around forever, but at 25, he’s not much older than several of the older players on this list.
by LanceAW on Jan 7, 2026 2:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
he got to AAA for the first time last year
and gave up 10 walks and 14 hits in 10.2 innings.
my main point is actually that you should never use “the Mets thought enough of him” as a justification of a player’s skills.
David Eckstein: so gritty they would eat him in the south for breakfast with some butter and sprinkle cheese.
by wrightHOF on Jan 7, 2026 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That’s too small of a sample size to put any weight in his AAA walk rate. For the season, he had 26 walks in 60 innings, which isn’t great but isn’t terrible either. Again, I’m not even saying he should be in the top 40 in the Mets’ system, but he’s got an outside chance of developing into a decent major league relief pitcher and many of the players on this list will never make the majors. Some will never get as close as Everts is now.
by LanceAW on Jan 7, 2026 4:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but he's also 25
and has never had success above A+ ball, he wasn’t any better in AA. And while some may never get as close as Everts is now I’d still say Everts is probably in the non-prospect category at this point.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 7, 2026 4:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
First Time As A Reliever
I can see him becoming a decent setup man.
Mark my words, he will be a major leaguer.
Hey guys, I run a music blog. alternative, powerpop, punk, electronica, screamo, etc etc, check it out. http://muzikdizcovery.blogspot.com/ artist interviews and many other stuff. free cookies! (not really, but still) :D
by cwhitman412 on Jan 7, 2026 9:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
niesen
sick, sick stuff. Should be great in the bullpen. Potential setup man/
by METSMETSMETS on Jan 7, 2026 9:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Best three names missing
Best three guys still missing in my opinion:
Ryan Coultas
Eduardo Aldama
Darrell Ceciliani
Coultas was shut down and had surgery on his shoulder, but apparently not too serious (no reconstruction, “cleaned out” whatever that means) and is supposed to be back. Had success as SP in AA with plus FB, a solid recently developed change, inconsistent breaking ball. Could have potential as a bullpen arm throwing mid-90s.
Aldama had a solid year in Kingsport as a 19 year old with a low 90s FB, decent change, and a breaking ball with some potential. Not a projectible frame though, and could end up a bullpen guy.
Ceciliani I’ve said enough about above.
But, I don’t really have a strong case for them over the guys listed. I kind of like the list as it is, just thought I’d throw this out there in case anyone else wants to argue one way or the other with these guys.
by acerimusdux on Jan 8, 2026 1:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs






