Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



New Blog: The 7th Floor for Miami Hurricanes Fans! Bar-right-arrows



Discussion Question: True or False, Tampa Bay

True or False:

The Tampa Bay Rays will be very disappointing in 2009, winning just 73-78 games.

Answer the question and explain your reasoning.

Poll
The Rays will disappoint and win just 73-78 games.

  1531 votes | Results

0 recs | Comment 55 comments | Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

too harsh

it wouldn’t completely shock me if they only won like 85-88 games, but no i don’t see them falling off that hard.

Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.

by doublestix on Feb 14, 2026 4:21 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agreed.

I think the pitching takes a step back this year, but I don’t think it falls on it’s face that hard.

by slurve on Feb 14, 2026 4:23 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

They will probably be a disappointment of sorts, as they got lucky in a few ways last year - most importantly pyth wise.

I could see them winning only 85 or so, but 90 is about as likely.

by alskor on Feb 14, 2026 4:34 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agree

They very well could disappoint - everything basically went right for them last year - but not to that degree.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Feb 15, 2026 6:01 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Even 81-85 seems like too much for me.

For a team that won 98 games and only got BETTER, losing more than 5-10 games more this season seems unlikely in my opinion.

Never, Never, NEVER give up

by hero66 on Feb 15, 2026 5:30 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

its ok

let them be in denial

by daveh33 on Feb 15, 2026 5:48 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They had a run differential of +103

so essentially they played like a 91 win team in 2008 and got lucky.

Now, that means they arent really close to the talent level of a 100 win team as some seem to presume… but they still should have legitimately won 90+ games. Theyre a very good, very deep team. They had some underachievers last year, but they had some overachievers as well… Hinske and Floyd werent really all that bad. I expect Burrell to be a nice upgrade, but not as much as people think. The Rays he is replacing didnt do all that badly. I would expect Crawford to bounce back, Upton to “bounce back” (he wasnt that bad or anything but he’s capable of better, especially in power categories), and decent chance Kazmir bounces back. Most of their gains were real, especially young players taking big steps forward. This is a legit team and one of the four or five most talented teams in baseball.

I basically see it like this:

DOWNSIDE
-Odds are they probably wont stay as healthy in 09.
-Kazmir is a health and performance question mark to some degree.
-Reliance (over-reliance?) on young players like Longoria and Gazra to not struggle while they develop and compete.
-Their offense wasnt great last year. Fourth most RS in the AL East and 9th in the AL.
-Exceeded their pyth by a decent margin… got fairly lucky and had many times hits
-Bullpen looks very shaky. Can Balfour repeat his 09 performance?? Bradford just had surgery… Teams that exceed their pyths usually have great pens.
-Presumably less ability to spend at the deadline for reinforcement compared to Boston and NY.

UPSIDE
-Greater depth than last year, so even if injuries are a bigger problem in 09 they have lots of MLB ready guys around to help out (Wade Davis, Niemann, Jaso, Brignac, etc…).
-David Price!
-Burrell is an OBP machine. He lengthens the lineup considerably.
-Will likely be as good as last year defensively, or at least close. Lots of young athletic players on this squad.
-Lots of young guys seemed to figure it out as the year went on and seem a decent bet to solidify those gains (ie Garza).
-Theyre now Playoff tested. These guys were weirdos like that anyway… they NEVER questioned themselves last year, but now there can be no doubt they belong with the class of baseball.
-Lots of good young pieces and strong farm system that gives them a huge edge over the Yankees (and to a lesser degree Sox) in going out and making trades.

I would pick them second to Boston right now on talent… but theyre very good and all three teams are within inches of each other - that is, well within the margin where it wouldnt and shouldnt be a surprise to see any of the three finish 1st or 3rd. They performed like a 91 win team in 08 but finished with 97 wins… Would it really be a shock to see them have the pyth of a 91 win team again and instead get unlucky and finish with 85 wins? Its very possible… its just the nature of baseball and doesnt mean a whole lot in the big scheme of things. I think 85 wins would be considered a disappointment by most people.

I cant envision a scenario where they finish with 73 wins. They are just too deep and too good for that.

by alskor on Feb 15, 2026 6:22 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i have a quibble with a few of your Downsides

— they weren’t very healthy last year. Kaz played injured. as did BOSSMAN, Pena, Longoria also hit the DL. odds are their 3 best hitters don’t all get injured again, right? plus Crawford had a down year… a really bad year for what he is capable of.

—i don’t see why they need the ability to spend? they are the best in the league at finding capable replacements for cheap. Aybar, Morgan Ensberg, Perez, Gross, etc… plus their minor leagues are stacked with guys ready to contribute at every position on the diamond (or can be used as trade bait)

—their offense will be better, everyone knows this… plus they were unlucky with risp.

—they proved that reliance on young players… = a myth. I never saw them at a disadvantage because of their youth all last year… why would that come into play this year now that they have experience and are battle-tested?

really the only thing you can call this team out on is the bullpen. Percival/Wheeler mostly.

by daveh33 on Feb 15, 2026 7:12 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

— they weren’t very healthy last year. Kaz played injured. as did BOSSMAN, Pena, Longoria also hit the DL. odds are their 3 best hitters don’t all get injured again, right? plus Crawford had a down year… a really bad year for what he is capable of.

As was discussed by someone above, the Tampa starting pitchers made 33-32-31-30-27 starts. That’s not all that common and getting that large amount of starts from your starting pitchers correlates well with success. Beckett, Dice K and Wakefield all made DL trips, Wang was lost for the year for the Yanks and they suffered many other injuries, Joba for one.

Were the injuries to their batters any worse than the Red Sox (Ortiz, Lowell, Drew and Lugo all missed significant time).?

I covered Crawford above. I would be surprised if he doesnt bounce back.

—i don’t see why they need the ability to spend? they are the best in the league at finding capable replacements for cheap. Aybar, Morgan Ensberg, Perez, Gross, etc… plus their minor leagues are stacked with guys ready to contribute at every position on the diamond (or can be used as trade bait)

I dont think you can argue that, comparative to the Yankees and Red Sox, the Rays have the same sort of financial muscle available to buy replacements in-season.

I think Friedman did a nice job of finding cheap help last year, but I dont think its safe to say he is the “best in the league at finding capable replacements for cheap.”

I mentioned specifically that the Rays have a ton of MLB ready depth.

—their offense will be better, everyone knows this… plus they were unlucky with risp.

I dont think everyone knows this. Iwamura, Bartlett Joyce and Navarro arent exactly sure things or great options. I would say the odds are they will score more runs in 09, but I dont think its safe to assume this.

Batting with RISP is just luck… there’s no guarantee they will be better at this next year.

—they proved that reliance on young players… = a myth. I never saw them at a disadvantage because of their youth all last year… why would that come into play this year now that they have experience and are battle-tested?

I dont think their success in 08 proved that at all. In fact, Id say it is very hard to win when youre relying on young players and this has been true throughout baseball history. Id say this was one of the more remarkable storylines surrounding the 08 Rays. Young players struggle often. Its a fact of life. Just because you didnt see it last year doesnt mean a whole lot. Did you start watching baseball last year?

really the only thing you can call this team out on is the bullpen. Percival/Wheeler mostly.

Nobody is “calling out” the Rays. I think you should re-read what i wrote above. I think Wheeler could very well be their best relief pitcher, actually.

by alskor on Feb 15, 2026 9:16 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

re: young players

Its not true for everyone though… sure it happens to a lot of guys, but not everyone. its not like you can make it a point that they are going to struggle because they’re young. that is what i call a myth, of course it happens, but its not guaranteed. and the Rays proved last year that they are not that kind of team.

as for their bullpen… go over to draysbay and have a poll for the guys who watch that team everyday and have sources and data…. ask them to rank the bullpen for you

by daveh33 on Feb 16, 2026 1:33 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Im not saying that it will necessarily be a problem, though - they have very good young players - but I felt I had to list it as a potential weakness. As I said above:

These guys were weirdos like that anyway… they NEVER questioned themselves last year,

Im not saying that the Rays young players will struggle - I have no idea if they will. Im saying young player are prone to struggles and the Rays have a higher than average amount of young players at key positions. Perhaps there is good reason to think the Rays young players are less risky than the average young players… I certainly feel that way about Longoria for instance, but on its face it is a potential weakness. I listed the fact that they have lots of young athletic guys as a plus on the injury and defense part of the equation.

Im not sure what youre saying about the pen there… are you saying Rays fans are worried about the pen or that theyre not…?

by alskor on Feb 16, 2026 1:59 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the pen

I’m saying Wheeler/Percival are universally regarded as the reason some people are worried about the pen. Howell is a stud, Balfour was a stud who may regress some, but he will figure it out. and everyone else plays well to their roles. Wheeler is the one you don’t want to give the ball to unless we’re up by 3. Percival, forget it.

by daveh33 on Feb 16, 2026 2:20 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They also add Joe Nelson and Brian Shouse

Those are two pretty good relievers. There bullpen, even with regression, should be fine.

vivaelbeñsheets

by vivaelpujols on Feb 16, 2026 2:50 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

mild dissapointment, but probably not a HUGE one, it’s just that in the ALE you need A LOT of things to go right to make the playoff, even if your the Yankee / Red Sox

by RollingWave on Feb 15, 2026 9:03 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

Exactly what I was thinking - a team that will take a step back, but still be above .500.

by guru4u on Feb 15, 2026 2:58 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Rays overperformed their pythag last year, so I think it's reasonable to expect some regression.

They also got subpar performances from Carl Crawford, Scott Kazmir and (to a lesser extent) B.J. Upton last season as well, though, and this year they’ll have David Price all season long. So they’d have to run into some pretty terrible luck to fall that far.

by acblue on Feb 14, 2026 4:28 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

not that bad

I can see them not catching a bunch of breaks staying close to .500… but I can’t see them fallign that far. the starting pitching is still there, they picked up the bat, bullpens are a crapshoot nomatter what. Longoria for an entire year, a healthy crawford, i’m thinking 82-88 wins.

"If you were a hot dog, would you eat yourself?"

by Trobone on Feb 14, 2026 4:28 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

can't wait for the 98 wins

that’s right.

how in the world would they fall to 73 wins?

injuries in May to Upton, Pena, Longoria, and 2 starters I guess…

by daveh33 on Feb 14, 2026 5:13 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they batted only .246 with RISP which is unrepeatable.

Maybe I’m being pedantic, but poor RISP average is definitely repeatable. It’s just not a skill (or lack of skill, in this case).

With 30 teams in Major League Baseball, odds are good that at any given time, one team will have overperformed with RISP 5 years in a row and one team will have underperformed 5 years in a row.

However, your underlying point (that there’s no reason to expect them to underhit their average with RISP again this season) is very correct. 92-70 sounds about right to me.

One good team and very possibly two good teams (I figure Toronto has a 50% shot and Baltimore maybe 20% of being good) will not make the playoffs from that division.

Many years from now, when his name's recalled
Everyone will say, "He should have passed the ball"
-- Al Stewart, "Football Hero"

by PaulThomas on Feb 14, 2026 7:35 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

False

Too much pitching, too many young players who will as a group improve, just too much talent overall. Longoria, Upton, Crawford, Price, Bartlett, Garza, Kazimir, Shields, even Burrel DHing like he should.

But on a side note, isn’t it funny how quickly standards change though? 2 years ago, the DEVIL Rays winning 78 or even 73 games would’ve been seen as miraculous, now people dismiss the thought out of hand. Heh

by JopeX37 on Feb 14, 2026 5:25 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

False, unless 3 or more starters get season ending injuries.

Brad Ziegler had a scoreless inning streak. Brad Ziegler had not met BJ Upton.

by P Brady on Feb 14, 2026 5:37 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i thought about this...

if Price pitches like I think he will (really well), and we still have Garza or Shields… then I think this is still an 80-85 win team.

Niemann, Davis, and Talbot might not be a bad 3-5. with Garza/Shields as a 1 and Price the #2.

or a trade could happen if Kaz, Sonny, and Garza/Shields all go down for the year… Rays still have plenty of pieces to deal.

by daveh33 on Feb 14, 2026 5:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

anyone who voted true, is afeared or delusional, and likely lives in the northeast US

remember that: "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering."

by daveh33 on Feb 14, 2026 5:44 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No

the main thing was their top 5 pitcher combined for 155+ starts last year. THAT is a lot harder to repeat than anything else.

Still though, I doubt they’ll fall THAT much. but the fact is, at least one of the top 3 team in the east will be on the outside lookign in.

by RollingWave on Feb 15, 2026 9:05 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

Agree with the pitching. Another year of the top five essentially making all the starts and the Rays would be a three-game series away from the play-offs.

I do have some questions on the year-to-year reliability of defensive metrics in believing any team will be considered good the next season based on d metrics from the season prior.

by faketeams on Feb 16, 2026 7:19 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Everyone can say false

but if the pen doesn’t repeat what it did last year, then yes, this could indeed happen.

by Daniel Plainview on Feb 14, 2026 6:49 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So the bullpen

is the difference between a 95 win team and a 75 win team. Does that make a lot of sense?

vivaelbeñsheets

by vivaelpujols on Feb 14, 2026 7:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

they have added bullpen depth.

and again, Niemann, Davis, Talbot wait in the wings…. plus McGee in the late summer if possible/need arises.

Yes, I do think if they have a weakness, its the pen.

No, I amn’t happy about Percival being “ready to go”

by daveh33 on Feb 14, 2026 7:04 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pitching

I think you have to look at their pitching. I dont believe any of their young pitchers had career yrs or yrs that cant be duplicated. I think the Pat Burrell is a good signing. I think Upton will have a much better year. Imagine a full year of Longoria as well. Then Price will be stuck in that rotation all year. Shields-Kazmir-Garza-Price-Sonnastine will be a dominate rotation. Welcome to the 90s braves redux.

by Michael Cave on Feb 14, 2026 8:12 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

show me one position where they will regress

This is one of those too good to be true deals where its hard to believe our own eyes. Its certainly possible the Rays not only win the division but do so with close to a 100 W’s.

I’m fairly sure their “pyth luck” from ’08 will be offset by:
a healthy in his prime Crawford
a healthy (remember the post season power) Bossman
a Joyce/Perez? platoon in RF
a whole season of a healthy (he was injured down the stretch w/ CC) Longoria,
a steady albeit slightly improving Navarro
Add in the obvious upgrade known as Burrell.
Pena, Aki & Bartlett are what they are at this point, no going backwards yet.
The D should remain constant correct?
Anybody here think Kaz, Shields, Sonny or Garza were lucky? Go back and check the numbers. Anybody here think Price is not a step up from EJax?

If they had the bullpen from ‘07 (possible worst in history) maybe they fall off 10 games. Figure they split the diff. between ’07 and ’08 at worst. But this yr’s edition was again smartly maneuvered this offseason. Maddon mixes/matches well, isn’t afraid to trust his instincts (yet another advantage). He knows his personnel thoroughly by now.

The better question is who’s left out in the cold between the Sauron & Saruman of baseball. I hope as always that it will be NYY but my hunch is Boston. Some like to talk about how they were 1 game away from Series - can’t have it both ways, they were also 1 game away from being run out in four straight. They looked old and played old. Only an obvious case of first time jitters let them back in - doubtful that happens again.

Mulder: Babe Ruth was an alien? Arthur Dales: sure; all the great ones were aliens.

by dew on Feb 14, 2026 8:59 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agree with the majority

While I think it’s not only possible but probable that they don’t make the playoffs - too many good players heading toward the big 2 - I still think they are a formidable team that will easily finish above .500.

Visit my D2 Baseball Blog - Northern Sun Baseball

by FishingMN on Feb 14, 2026 9:26 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

False

David Price will give the pitching a boost and Evan Longoria will be even more dangerous in 2009, as he cuts down on his strikeouts. The Rays won’t be quite as successful as they were a year ago, but they will still be a solid team and finish with ~90 wins.

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on Feb 14, 2026 10:50 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let's not forget Kazmir was pretty much hiding some soreness/injury for most of the year.

from the AS break on, he didn’t even throw sliders. he was fastball/change all that time. that is incredible to me that he was able to compete.

by daveh33 on Feb 15, 2026 12:08 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The rays are due for regression

I think it’s only natural especially considering the talent in the AL East. You could argue every team besides Toronto improved, that alone should take wins from Tampa.

Obviously bullpens are fickle, I don’t think it’s smart to pencil another season of domination, regardless of what rookies are “waiting in the wings.”

I think the offense is the only thing you can say without any hesitation should improve.

by Kenan and Kel on Feb 15, 2026 12:18 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"You could argue every team besides Toronto improved, that alone should take wins from Tampa."

Of course, you can’t argue that the Rays improved. I mean, they lost Eric Hinske, Edwin Jackson and Cliff Floyd, and only added Pat Burrell, Matt Joyce, David Price and Gabe Kapler to replace them.

Vogt early, Vogt often.

by Brickhaus on Feb 15, 2026 1:05 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

+1

Matt Joyce in RF and Burrell at DH gives them an above-average player at every position except SS, and even Bartlett is right around league average with his defense. This team has a full season of Longoria, a full season of Price, and probably some increased power output from Upton to look forward to, as well as regression from Crawford, and it’s added a 24-year-old right fielder who gives average offense and plus defense to the mix.

by slamcactus on Feb 15, 2026 2:20 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They will regress some

if for not other reason than that division is simply brutal. Orioles are set to improve I think, and the other clubs didn’t do anything to make me think they are anything less than they were last season. Put them anywhere other than AL East & they could very well win 95+ again.

"Errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it."
-Thomas Jefferson

by thinwhiteduke on Feb 15, 2026 3:32 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I dont buy that.

Other than the Yankees, nobody in that division made any huge upgrades. The Red Sox got a bunch of oft-injured pitchers, and have Bay instead of Manny all season. The Orioles still have no pitching, and the Blue Jays are awful.

Plus, even though the Yankees got better, the Rays did too. It doesnt mean they’re about to go 5-14 against them or something.

I still see the Rays winning anywhere from 90-98 games this year.

Never, Never, NEVER give up

by hero66 on Feb 15, 2026 5:34 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No upgrades???

Red Sox - essentially tread water in the lineup with expected improvements from young core, and Derek Lowe improves the rotation. Perpetually one of the best teams in baseball.

Orioles: Underperformed their pythag by 5 wins last year. Can expect improvement from Adam Jones and Nick Markakis (who’s gotten better every year and should up his power a bit), and the addition of Wieters as early as May. Tillman and Arrietta potentially ready to provide rotation upgrades by mid-season. This team could easily play .500 ball and has the upside to do better of a couple of things break right.

Blue Jays: Burnett loss offset by full seasons from Travis Snider and Adam Lind, which will replace the several hundred at-bats that went to the likes of Matt Stairs, Brad Wilkerson, Shannon Stewart, and Kevin Mench last year. Additionally, Aaron Hill and Vernon Wells should be healthy all year.

Yankees: huge, huge upgrades. Well documented and known by all who love baseball.

The AL-east is absolutely brutal next year. I still think the Rays won’t regress, but they’ll have to play a ton of games against 4 division rivals who all grade between decent and excellent.

by slamcactus on Feb 15, 2026 6:49 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

derek lowe is on the braves

i kind of like the sox’s additions… but they are all injury risks.

by daveh33 on Feb 15, 2026 7:05 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Poll by wins

A poll of how many wins they will get to see where everyone stands may have been better. I’d be curious to see out of the 85% how many would be in the low to mid 80’s and who really believes in them and sees 90+wins.
I voted for the 78 end of the 73-78, not because I think they will fall apart but I wanted to be on the opposite side of the ’there’s no way’ crowd. I think they are closer to an 80 win team than a 90 win team. I wouldn’t be surprised by a .500 season, I don’t think they’d fall below that but I think 82-84 is alot more likely than people think.
Their expected record was only 91 wins. They scored the second fewest runs in the division, they played 11 games over in 1 run games, they were 33 games over at home, 14 games over within the division. Those aren’t likely to stay at those levels.
And on top of those places where regression can happen, I wouldn’t be too confident in being a 90+ win team with that bullpen, and no closer at the end to bail them out.

by GoldenSpikes24 on Feb 15, 2026 3:51 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not a crazy ? at all but

I don’t see it. The argument they will have a dramatic fall off is the division they play in-Toronto is also decent, and I think their offense will struggle more. The pro argument is a great and deep staff and the rest of the league is down. I like no one in the Central and LA is good in West but not as good as 08-Texas has suprise potential, Oakland maybe but the 3 best teams in AL all reside in AL East

by ribman on Feb 15, 2026 4:38 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I voted false, and most of the answers here cover my thoughts

But I do wonder something: Why would John pick a number that is so obviously causing a huge difference in voting? For many here, it’s a no-brainer. That’s not like John. A better poll would’ve said 81-85 wins or 83-87 wins. Then I think the true/false split would be closer to 50/50. So I wonder if John is expecting a huge collapse for some reason. Otherwise it just seems like the 70-win range is, of course, possible, but really improbable.

by thejd44 on Feb 15, 2026 11:03 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Agree

It would be a more interesting question if 81-85 were used. It would make more people think a little harder about what the moves made by the rest of the AL East will do to the Rays’ prospects.

Visit my D2 Baseball Blog - Northern Sun Baseball

by FishingMN on Feb 16, 2026 9:50 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

They regress

The pitching lived a blessed life last year. Really no serious injuries. That doesn’t happen two years in a row. Sox are no longer a championship contender but still a force to be reckoned with. Yankees won 89 games with almost no pitching, and disappointing offense. If the offense returns to 06/07 form, and the pitching stays reasonably healthy, they have a 100 win team.

People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring. ~Rogers Hornsby

by sdhman11 on Feb 16, 2026 11:52 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deadhorse_small
BP's Top 100 Prospects
Img_0175_small
Keith Law Rangers Q&A;
Small
Community Synthesis?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Deep prospects for last rounds of MILB draft?
Small
Community Synthesis Once More
Batmanbaseball_small
Community Prospect List: #144
950e_2_small
Renew or Drop !!
Question about Minor League "Authors"
AA Ballplayers
Minor League Defensive Data
An immediate impact player
Small
Need Draft Advice
Small
Amateur Draft Decision

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

John Sickels

ad

Site Meter
Site Meter