Orioles Discussion
I am now working on the Baltimore Orioles for the book. Here is a thread to discuss this system.
Interesting stuff at the top...Wieters and Tillman of course, plus some intriguing mid-level guys, though they could use more depth.
0 recs |
56
comments
| Add comment
Comments
Matusz
I’d consider Matusz to absolutely be at the top (along with Wieters & Tillman).
Lefties with control of 4 at least MLB average pitches don’t come around every day.
by soxkid on
Nov 17, 2025 9:24 PM EST
reply
0 recs
+1
1. Wieters ……… A
2. Matusz/Tillman …. A-
3. Matusz/Tillman …. A-
4. Arrieta …….. B/B+ (always liked this guy)
5. Erbe ……. B
Matusz/Tillman is very close, depends what you’re looking for I guess. Some notable analysts are on record as preferring Matusz - i.e Jim Callis (http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=22592)
by rdf8585 on
Nov 17, 2025 10:02 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Yeah
I think there’s a clear big 3 and then the rest (technically a big 1 and then the rest). Saying that I feel like I’m slighting Arrieta a bit by leaving him out but he’s a little behind Tillman and Matusz.
by cowboy4eva on
Nov 17, 2025 10:01 PM EST
reply
0 recs
how in the world can you put...
tillman and matusz on the same line? tillman has to be above matusz…….let’s let the guy make his debut and then we can decide where he should be ……
by psugator on
Nov 17, 2025 11:10 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Welcome
to the world of prospect rankings.
by cowboy4eva on
Nov 17, 2025 11:20 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
He's made a few starts in the AFL
And done pretty well sans the homers.
My best game plan is to sit on the bench and call out specific instructions like 'C'mon Boog,' 'Get ahold of one, Frank,' or 'Let's go, Brooks.' -Earl Weaver
by Baltimo on
Nov 17, 2025 11:47 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Oh
He’s done pretty well in a small sample size except for the times he’s gotten the ball hit out of the park
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on
Nov 18, 2025 1:03 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
He's done quite well.
27:5 K:BB in 22 innings. 1.50 GB/FB. Remember, the AFL is a pretty extreme hitters league this year. The five homers can’t be very reliable given his groundball rate.
by Lt Melmo on
Nov 18, 2025 1:30 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
It does not alarm me
He is pitching in a hitters league and is on one of the worst staffs in Arizona.
1.10 WHIP/27 K/5 BB/11ER in 22.2 Innings. He has given up five homers, but you have to take that number with a grain of salt as he has probably been working on his fourth pitch.
The AFL is said to be be an AA+ league, and for a guy who is making his pro debut, I’m not disappointed in the least. Sure it’s a small sample size and guys are fatigued, but Matusz hadn’t gotten a single real game in over the summer.
My best game plan is to sit on the bench and call out specific instructions like 'C'mon Boog,' 'Get ahold of one, Frank,' or 'Let's go, Brooks.' -Earl Weaver
by Baltimo on
Nov 18, 2025 3:21 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
I should add
League average ERA is around 5.80 runs.
My best game plan is to sit on the bench and call out specific instructions like 'C'mon Boog,' 'Get ahold of one, Frank,' or 'Let's go, Brooks.' -Earl Weaver
by Baltimo on
Nov 18, 2025 3:23 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
some thoughts
1. Wieters A
2. Tillman A-/B+
3. Matusz B+
4. Arrieta B+
by METSMETSMETS on
Nov 17, 2025 11:11 PM EST
reply
0 recs
i'm with RDF
I think it’s a top 5, not a top 4. There’s not nearly as big a gap between Arrieta and Erbe as a superficial look at their stats would indicate. I’d prefer Arrieta, but only by a small margin. Considering age and K/BB ratios, very close….and Erbe has a higher upside.
by scooter on
Nov 17, 2025 11:28 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Troy Patton
Hopefully he comes back healthy. He’s still young and a lefty. Wonder if they’ll put him in the pen now after labrum surgery. Anyone hear anything about his rehab?
by The Colonel on
Nov 17, 2025 11:35 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Reports have been very good
He’ll be ready for spring training barring a setback.
by dkdc on
Nov 17, 2025 11:48 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Fall Stats
The O’s had a lot of their top talent playing ball this fall.
Arizona Fall League
Snyder: .328/.418/.655 (Serious sleeper, IMO)
Reimold: .271/361/.494 (solid line, but streaky)
Wieters: .290/.402/.420 (Does he need half a season at AAA?)
Matusz: 22.2 IP, 27/5 K/BB, 5 HR, 1.10 WHIP, 4.37 ERA (very nice debut, start off at AA?)
Hawaii Winter League
Henson: .266/.384/.444 (Good to see some walks)
Bascom and Gleason got shredded.
by dkdc on
Nov 17, 2025 11:39 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Matusz
AA probably not. My bet is that he begins in high A Frederick like Arrieta did this year. But could moved aggressively if performance warrants it.
by rdf8585 on
Nov 18, 2025 12:06 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Mickolio
Gotta love a 6’9 righty with a sinker like that. I’m curious to see what you give him.
by jfish26101 on
Nov 17, 2025 11:55 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Some intriguing mid-level guys...
I think the mid-level guys are the prospects who may make this a pretty strong crop. Everyone loves to write about the Big 3 (Wieters, Tillman, and Matusz), but, some guys behind them could be above-average players in their own right like Reimold and Snyder. Snyder has fallen off the first few seasons below the radar, but he’s been quietly putting together s nice rebound period ever since last year’s Fall League. This season’s AA appearance will be a pivotal season for him. Arrieta and Erbe both have some intriguing possibilities. More and more Erbe may be an eventual bullpen arm if the command issues persist. Arrieta is probably the better balanced and poised version between the two Dropped-In-The-Draft-But-Signed-Above-Slot draftee for the Os. Both are strong picks for where they picked them.
I have some confidence in more than a few of the guys out of the top 10. A few years ago, John Maine was considered the Orioles top pitching prospect. In this system, I don’t think he cracks the top 10. In fact I don’t think he even trumps David Hernandez. The Os have a lot of arms and I have my hopes that attrition won’t eat up all the depth.
All in all, we must keep in mind the current players in the majors that these guys would be added to, like Markakis and Jones of course. JJ. Guthrie maybe. They have some other solid guys in Michlio, Albers, Sarfate. And perhaps one or more of Penn, Olson, Liz turn into something too.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 12:27 AM EST
reply
0 recs
Don't sleep on Rowell
He still has time, and if he puts together a nice 2009, people’s opinions will change quickly.
My best game plan is to sit on the bench and call out specific instructions like 'C'mon Boog,' 'Get ahold of one, Frank,' or 'Let's go, Brooks.' -Earl Weaver
by Baltimo on
Nov 18, 2025 12:40 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
zach britton lhp
12-7 3.12 147 1/3 118h 114/49 k/bb 2.81 go/ao .219 baa at delmarva low A
An intresting prospect that will start at high A and could end up in AA….low 90s Fb, slider has really came along nicely probly a plus pitch now, and his change up is solid….not in the class of tillman, matusz or arrietta but i think he can be a good 3/4 ML starter…ill be intrested in seeing what John has 2 say about him…
Overall though the Baltimore system has come a long way in 12 months..
by cubsfan1 on
Nov 18, 2025 12:32 AM EST
reply
0 recs
Britton
Is the guy I’m most interested in seeing his ranking/rating. Brandon Snyder a distant 2nd.
by cowboy4eva on
Nov 18, 2025 11:44 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
britton
i think this kid could really sneak up on some ppl in 09
by cubsfan1 on
Nov 18, 2025 4:19 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Interested in John's take on Rowell.
disappointing season to say the least, but a serious improvement in terms of average in the last month… last year a B. What do you see for this season?
by gpellet41 on
Nov 18, 2025 12:33 AM EST
reply
0 recs
thanks to a .406 BABIP in august...
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on
Nov 18, 2025 12:55 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
And?
It could just as easily mean that he was simply killing the ball.
by wickedwitch on
Nov 18, 2025 10:37 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
you'd think his power numbers would be better if he was "killing" the ball
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on
Nov 18, 2025 8:13 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
His problem is
that he strikes out way, way too much for a guy without premier power. if he could raise his average somehow to .300 he’d be a marginal player, but without that he’s significantly less
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on
Nov 18, 2025 1:08 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
hits the ball on the ground far too much as well.
62%? that is ridiculous.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on
Nov 18, 2025 1:36 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
I've also heard...
…that he’s in need of an “attitude adjustment” (yes? no?).
by royshowell on
Nov 18, 2025 11:17 AM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Rowell at Frederick
I watched Rowell at Frederick 3 times this past year, and — small sample size alert, plus I am not a scout, plus I am not a psychologist — if I were a coach, I would say he looked utterly disinterested in every aspect of playing baseball. Lackluster fielding, hack-at-everything hitting, not legging out foul balls, etc., etc.
None of that may mean anything, but when you hear “he needs an attitude adjustment,” I suspect it comes from people like me who’ve seen him play like that.
by AndrewTorrez on
Nov 18, 2025 5:04 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Rowell...
I may have to agree a bit on this. He’s never struck me as a hungry kid laying it all out there. This is just based on body language I’ve seen but I’ve seen the kid play a lot. It’s obvious why he is regarded so highly based just on physical gifts, but the danger with drafting such young kids is that they might act like a..well..a kid. Go figure.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 10:46 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Hernandez
would be considered in the top 10. Lead the EL in K’s with 167 and was 3rd in ERA and a BAA of .217. Command an issue but if he can have a BB/9 of ’07(2.91) and have the same success in ’08 then possible 3/4 starter.
by orioole26 on
Nov 18, 2025 12:41 AM EST
reply
0 recs
The O’s have a nice crop of prospects coming along - obviously Wieters is the gem (how those teams drafting ahead of Baltimore regret not drafting him)
IMO & based on 08 season:
1 Wieters A
2 Tillman A-/B+
3 Matusz B+
4 Arrieta B+/B
5 Erbe or Hernandez B-
the top 4 are clear & then a drop to Erbe or Hernandez - problem is they are the exact opposites - Hernandez is the guy who record is better than his supposed stuff & Erbe the stuff better than the record.
Problem for the O’s is that there is a real lack of position players post-Wieters & most are either high upside but very raw (eg Avery or Hoes) or guys who are under performing & have limited growth (eg Costanzo,Reimold or Snyder - since his move to 1B).
It will be interesting to see how John actual rates the guys in the 10-20 range & some unusual players like Mickolio or Rowell (& his awful tendency with Ks)
by frenchredsox on
Nov 18, 2025 1:40 AM EST
reply
0 recs
Reimold and Snyder
I think you’re undervaluing Reimold. The only problem with Reimold in his minor league career was getting injured which forced him to lose 1.5 years. That accounts for his age. Other than that he’s performed well, and is continuing to do so at AFL. He’s a power hitter who hits moonshots, can take walks, and is a plus defender. How is that limited? No one’s suggesting he’s a perrenial MVP, but, you make him sound like he’s barely Jeromy Burnitz.
Snyder suffered a labrum and 2 lost years as well and that knocked him off track but ever since, he’s been building a nice rebound campaign for the last 1.5 years, and like Reimold, he’s continuing to do so in the AFL. He needs to increase the power and/or reduce the Ks but he’s not been a liability as you imply.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 8:36 AM EST
reply
0 recs
Reimold and Snyder
I wasnt saying they were bad LOL - what I said due to certain factors - in Reimold’s case injuries/power limit & in Snyder’s case the move from C to 1B - have changed what their upside value was seen as in the past.
I think Reimold,due to his performance could be a solid RF/CF but not a B+ prospect like he was just a couple of years ago.
I maintain that after Weiters the drop is quite large & quick & that the top 10 will be dominated by Pitchers’.
Snyder,to me is an enigma,simply because he moved from a consensus high D position to the “weakest” D position.The move in itself & his injury record means,IMO,he has to really over perform with the bat (which he did in 08) but still the upside is lower than previously envisioned.
I would think both are solid B/B-‘s depending on how you rate attributes & needs.The O’s have deifinately moved forward but Snyder WONT be 1B starter in 09 & that is where the hole is at the moment (unless they decide to sign Tex or move Aubrey there).
I like Reimold & at his age think he could have a shot to make the OD roster in 09.
by frenchredsox on
Nov 18, 2025 4:17 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Reimold is 25
It might not be his “fault” that he’s 25, but he’s 25 and he’s mastered AA ball. That’s not impressive.
Snyder can’t field enough to play C or 3B, and can’t hit enough to play first. Period. I’ll say it: these guys are not prospects.
by AndrewTorrez on
Nov 18, 2025 5:05 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Both guys are older because...
…of injuries mainly…it took both guys about a year or year and a half to fully recover…I believe they both had labrum tears which aren’t easy injuries to come back from…if they were pitchers, they might be done…the move to 1B for Snyder was talked about before he was drafted, but I don’t think he really had even a full year at C to decide it one way or the other, defense or otherwise. He came in as a C in short season the year he was drafted, then had a half season at lower A ball, then got injured…by the time he came back he was only doing rehab stints and then, Wieters entered the picture…
I agree that we shouldn’t ignore the age/level argument which works against Reimold, but, it’s not as if he repeated a level or two because of seemingly no reason at all (e.g. Rowell). If a pitcher had TJ surgery which forced his rise to the majors to slow, that’s about the kind of track we have to factor in for Reimold. Though the fact of the matter is that Reimold still has the same kind of pure power potential that he had at age 22, perhaps with more track record today since he’s done it at AA and has ranked in the top of the leaderboards in his league. The same way we might downgrade a B+ pitching prospect recovering from TJ to B or B-, we might do the same with Reimold here. To talk of the kid as if he’s an organizational player is idiotic.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 10:29 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
My top 5
1) Wieters A
2) Matusz B+
3) Tillman B+ (his flyball tendencies worry me)
4) Arrieta B+
5) Erbe B
by wickedwitch on
Nov 18, 2025 10:44 AM EST
reply
0 recs
My O's Ten
M.Wieters A The best prospect in baseball.
C.Tillman A- Needs to improve control to become ace, but has time on his side.
B.Matusz B+ Good in Arizona.
J.Arrieta B+ Promising. Needs to work on control.
B.Erbe B Much better repeating A+. Needs to cut down on HRs to be effective.
N.Reimold B Good chance to make it as average corner outfielder.
B.Snyder B- Nice rebound in ’08; still just 21.
D.Hernandez B- Needs more time in AA, but looking good as a back end starter or setup man.
B.Rowell C+ Still has the talent; will production ever come?
L.Hoes C+ Fast with good plate discipline. In GCL, posted .308/.416/.390 line.
by randymilligan on
Nov 18, 2025 1:06 PM EST
reply
0 recs
+1
I think this list will be pretty close.
Considering John gave Porcello a B+ with this comment in 2008:
(I am hesitant to give out a Grade A- or Grade A without seeing some pro numbers first. This grade should not be interpreted as a negative comment on Porcello).
https://www.minorleagueball.com/2007/12/10/134646/64
Matusz is certain to be a B+. I think Wieters is clearly going to be an A and Tillman slots in nicely between at A-. I could actually see John being agressive with a full A for Tillman, though, but I wouldnt quibble with either grade.
I think Arrieta has to be a B+ as well… after that, Erbe repeating a level could go B or B+, and the rest have some leeway. I would like to see Hernandez up there.
by alskor on
Nov 18, 2025 1:34 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
close
current grades Wieters A, Tillman B+, Arrieta B+, haven’t done Matusz yet.
by John Sickels on
Nov 18, 2025 1:48 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Well
looks like I was off. Interested to see the comments on Tillman. I dont have an issue with the grade. I like Tillman a lot, but dont really have any strong feelings on the subject. Im sure there will be a great deal of discussion about it, though.
Thanks for the sneak preview…
by alskor on
Nov 18, 2025 2:23 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Based on eveyone's list...
The Big Three are truly the big three. The link on the side titled “101 Top Prospects” puts Wieters at #2, Tillman at #8, Arrieta at #27, and then Matusz at #31 (probably due to being a recent draftee). Out of these 4 guys, the Os may have a nice crop of future stars to add to Markakis and Jones. And perhaps Guthrie as the “old man” of the team by then.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 1:28 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Tillman
I like this guy but not as a future ace type . . .what are people seeing in him that I’m not? He looks like a curveball artist with solid but not great attributes elsewhere. I think some may be reading a bit too much into a pretty ERA and being young for the league.
I’d gladly take Matusz.
by mrkupe on
Nov 18, 2025 1:35 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Curveball Artist?
I’d say he’s more of a power pitcher with a projectable body, great K rates, and the potential for three plus pitches. He dominated Double-A as a 20-year old.
by ThomasG on
Nov 18, 2025 2:51 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
The main attribute about Tillman...
..is his fastball. He came to Spring training and he was the talk of camp because he was considered to have one of the more overpowering fastballs from a minorleaguer in camp for a while. He does have a good complement of secondary stuff but it’s the fastball, fastball, fastball with this kid. He was a young kid with the Os and the Ms and is featuring a mid-90s fastball. He hasn’t yet filled out yet but already has major league velocity.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 7:09 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
other Oriole prospects
Underrated Oriole prospects:
Zach Britton
Tyler Henson
Ryan Adams
Overrated Oriole prospects:
Bergeson
Patton
Mickolio
Librarians are hiding something
by dfa on
Nov 18, 2025 3:15 PM EST
reply
0 recs
Mickolio
Is Mickolio overrated? I really don’t hear many people overrating him.
by ThomasG on
Nov 18, 2025 3:57 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
BA
BA ranked him in the Orioles top 10, that was pretty surprising…
Librarians are hiding something
by dfa on
Nov 18, 2025 4:17 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
BA ranked him in the Orioles top 10, that was pretty surprising…
BA has its" likes & dislikes" - sometimes I have a hard time following their logic.For example,they ranked Hagadone the no #3 prospect in the Red Sox system - this a guy with less 20 IPs & is sidelined for nearly all 08 season & at least the start of the 09………..
Kam is what BA (rightly or wrongly) consider a upside prospect because of his size/plane for pitching (the now infamous Big Unit mold).
Is he a prospect ? Yes,but top #10 difficult to say considering his varied performance all through his milb career - even this year he was very hittable at AA (1.59 WHIP) to nearly unhittable in AAA (1.10) but extreme small sample size.The walk rate however is a concern as he goes forward but I would say that he is more in the 15-20 range than top 10…
by frenchredsox on
Nov 18, 2025 7:45 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
O's grades
Wieters A (clearly the #1 prospect in baseball, in my mind)
Tillman B+ — on the plus side, he dominated AA at age 20; on the minus side, control
Matusz B+ — no track record
Arrieta B/B+
everyone else C
There’s just so much garbage in this system that wouldn’t be on anyone’s radar in a decent organization. Rowell can’t hit or field. Snyder doesn’t have the glove to play third or the bat to play first. Erbe doesn’t have an out pitch. Patton, Mickolio… these guys are roster filler.
And I hated, hated HATED my home team’s 2008 Rule 4 draft. Bleh.
by AndrewTorrez on
Nov 18, 2025 4:58 PM EST
reply
0 recs
...a lot of people's idea of the Os farm system is based on...
…the minorleague system they carried through the early 00s. When I hear those comments usually it’s from fans who don’t really follow the minors that closely…ever since the abysmal Syd Thrift years, where they ranked last or near last around 2000, they’ve slowly made their way up. For the last 3 or so years they’ve been either middle or middle-upper level system. The “There’s just so much garbage in this system that wouldn’t be on anyone’s radar in a decent organization” comment is harsh and not that informed.
I’d guess that John would agree that this system has made steady progress for the last 3 or so years, at least since Jordan took over Player Development, and certainly since MacPhail really put them on the Rebuilding path.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 7:14 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Clueless
that’s all you are just clueless. Orioles minor league system will probably be in the top 10 or higher.
by orioole26 on
Nov 18, 2025 9:30 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
The default comment for the Os...
Is to bash them pretty much out of habit, either based in fact or not. Granted that it’s fair since they’ve contributed to that reputation in these last 10 or so years, but, the last few years the Os have deserved credit. They have been turning it around, and it started before MacPhail got there. Macphail has expanded the International Development program and he’s been making the tough salary dump-for-prospects type of trade you expect from a rebuilding club. They need to continue it, but it’s not as if they are signing 35+ yr old former All-Stars for inane contracts and years while giving up the draft picks anymore. Today most of the bashing comes over things like signing former Giants 1st rounder Hennesy to a minor league contract, or, signing a reliever.
It’s idiotic that random fans of other teams, are so used to expecting the Os to make bad moves, that they find a way to nitpick everything they do, until they are complaining about minutiae. At some point you’ve gotta think it’s like a rich priviledged kid beating up a homeless man who’s down on his luck, down and out.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 10:41 PM EST
up
reply
0 recs
Most systems are defined by their top...
…and then you look and see how fast the general depth fades out to “Organizational Player” level. The Orioles are extremely deep in arms. As far as position players, they have their top guys but after, say, Ryan Adams or Matt Angle (who I am not a fan of either) it thins out quickly. All in all, I believe the Os have a deep system in pitching.
Wieters A
Tillman B+
Matusz B+
Arrieta B+/B
Any system with those guys at the top should be good eventually. The degree of attrition that hits the pitching depth will decide how successful this crop will be. Add these guys to Markakis and Jones and they have the makings of an interesting core. Remember that they have already graduated and traded for quite a few arms at or around the majors (i.e. Ray, J. Johnson, Liz, Olson, Penn?, Albers, Sarfate, Michilio, et al..). Even tho their pitching didn’t have much success in the majors, the minors featured some strong rotations with good logjams. That logjam should start to reach the major league level next year.
by basemonkey on
Nov 18, 2025 11:01 PM EST
reply
0 recs





