Daniel Cabrera and the K/BB Ratio from Hell

Daniel Cabrera (AP photo)
In the interesting young pitcher department today, we have Daniel Cabrera, RHP, Baltimore Orioles. He's got a great arm, and he had flashes of success in his 2004 rookie season. He also had a horrible 76/89 K/BB ratio in 148 innings last summer.
Cabrera was very effective this spring: 1.64 ERA, 15/5 K/BB in 22 innings, showing much better command. Will this hold up in the regular season? Will his control improve enough for him to live up to the potential in his pure arm strength? I think Cabrera could be a dominating pitcher, but his command was so bad last year that you have to wonder if it can improve so drastically within one season. Or is Ray Miller this much of a genius?
What say you, should we look for a big improvement from Cabrera, yes or no?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
not so much
by rickieweekshof2028 on Apr 3, 2026 5:51 PM EDT reply actions
No
It could happen, I suppose, but I'm taking the "I'll believe it when I see it" position.
by delomir on Apr 3, 2026 6:12 PM EDT reply actions
he can't get any worse...
by IBCCommish on Apr 3, 2026 6:29 PM EDT reply actions
question
He's been moved very (overly) quickly, and the only time he got to repeat a level, he pushed his K/BB ratio to 2.75.
My guess is that he starts to trust his stuff (thanks possibly to Miller's mantra of working fast), and pushes his K/BB rate to somewhere between 2-1 and 2.5-1. Improvement, but not to the ST level.
He's never shown an ability to NOT walk guys, so long-term his success will probably become dependent on his ability to keep missing bats and avoiding HR's.
by joeficarra on Apr 3, 2026 8:09 PM EDT reply actions
improves
My guess is he'll get things "under control" again, and by that I mean not atrociously awful. Especially with Ray Miller preaching "throw strikes--work fast."
My guess is he'll improve to 8K/9IP, 4BB/9IP, and a K/BB of 2. I'm still not as excited about him as a lot of "real" analysts (Gammons, Scott Miller), at least not until he shows me something more, but I've some (perhaps naive) hope.
by bc on Apr 3, 2026 8:23 PM EDT reply actions
Average pitcher
Speakin of the O's, how stunted is Majewski's development because of this labrum/cuff issue?
by jayg on Apr 3, 2026 8:58 PM EDT reply actions
nope
I think looking at spring numbers is wishfull thinking.
I don't see him ever doing much but he get lots of chances becasue scout will "love his arm" even if the results done come.
by providence bruins on Apr 3, 2026 10:47 PM EDT reply actions
Bruce Chen
by theoldbreed on Apr 3, 2026 11:42 PM EDT reply actions
Yeah. Coicidence
Could be the definition of 'random.'
by PeterF on Apr 4, 2026 12:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Ordinarily I'd agree
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/gammons/story?id=2028294
Gammons says he has a new pitch. Miller was famous for teaching the straight change, before he was a manager, to big league pitchers.
I don't think this is a case of a mysterious influence by a pitching coach. I think this is a case where Miller knows something about how to teach a particular pitch that can work for particular pitchers who lack some variety in their pitches.
If Cabrera was a change-speeds pitcher before, then there is no way Miller works any magic. But he was fastball-slider pitcher with nothing else to call on.
by greenlantern on Apr 4, 2026 4:07 AM EDT reply actions
track record
by jhelfgott on Apr 4, 2026 4:35 AM EDT reply actions
He'll do better
by simsypoo on Apr 4, 2026 8:19 AM EDT reply actions
Gammons
Its no coincidence that Cabrera and Erik Bedard had good springs. Ray Miller has had a tremendous affect on Cabrera and Bedard with their increased control and new changeups
by stwright on Apr 4, 2026 9:10 AM EDT reply actions
yes
by thook007 on Apr 4, 2026 10:47 AM EDT reply actions
greenlantern is right
by So Cal Bob on Apr 4, 2026 1:36 PM EDT reply actions
He was supposed to learn Pedro's circle change...
...last year, his Twins start was a phenomenal thing to see...not because the raw stats say so (although they do) but they really belied the real story of that game...that was the first game where he cut loose and really threw the hardest any Os fan has seen from him...before that time, he would reach 95-97 mph...in that game he was hitting 98-100 mph throughout the game...and ever since that game, that's really where he operates...that day, the Twins batters looked completely helpless against him...
...the insane thing about Cabrera is that before his velocity increase, he was always said to have a curveball that was in the mid-80s...since the velocity increase, he's been throwing that same pitch with tons more oomph behind it making it more of a slider by virtue of its velocity (88-91 mph) but the arc is really more like a 11-5 curve...you couldn't really call it a slurve because it's just too hard a pitch and has too much break...I guess "power curve" fits...
by basemonkey on Feb 7, 2026 8:34 PM EST reply actions

by John Sickels on 











