Pittsburgh Pirates Organization Discussion
I am now working on the Los Angeles Angels prospect report. The next team in line is the Pittsburgh Pirates, to be followed by the New York Mets, Chicago White Sox, and Colorado Rockies.
Use this thread to discuss the Pirates organization. The administration here has dumped a ton of money into the draft the last few years, focusing primarily on high-upside arms, particularly with over-slot high school pitchers. What do you think of the results? It looks very thin on the positional side to me. Would you do anything different in upcoming drafts, especially considering the changes in the CBA? What is your master plan to restore this team to competitiveness in the big leagues?
Do you see any risk that Gerrit Cole could become the Pedro Alvarez of pitchers?
As always, feel free to point out sleepers and overlooked players.
116 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I would just make sure
to not trade away their best prospects for win-now players if they’re on the brink of contention in the next few years. Think like the Rays and funnel money/resources into player development and the draft.
by Jaumiusk on Dec 21, 2025 11:03 AM EST reply actions
Well....
sometimes you have to make a deal for a Latos when you have the chance to win, even if it means giving up three or four upper-level prospects. Otherwise you can wind up like the Angels, hoarding prospects that you really have no use for and passing up chances to improve the major league team enough.
Not that the Pirates are at that stage yet, but the NL Central is in sufficient flux that if the team is offered a chance in a year or two to acquire an established, relatively young building block, while giving up a couple of not-quite-there-yet prospects, they could be well advised to take it.
Mike Emeigh http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/minor_key/
by MikeE on Dec 21, 2025 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
"Do you see any risk that Gerrit Cole could become the Pedro Alvarez of pitchers?"
Actually, yes.
by Kelsdad on Dec 21, 2025 11:09 AM EST reply actions
-infinity
I’ll give u the inherent risk with him, and most all pitchers in general, but the Cole skeptics around here just don’t get it. Bauer isn’t even in this kids atmosphere when it comes to upside.
by St.Steve on Dec 21, 2025 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
but his floor is significantly higher wouldn't you say
go long with extenze...i do
by angelsownredsux on Dec 21, 2025 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
Bauer's floor is what I'm referring to
go long with extenze...i do
by angelsownredsux on Dec 21, 2025 2:23 PM EST up reply actions
Yes
I’d agree with that.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 2:29 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
yes
I evaluate/project prospects like a bizarro Adam foster…don’t weigh the floor factor much at all.
by St.Steve on Dec 21, 2025 2:58 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think Bauer’s floor is significantly higher than Cole’s, personally. It’s a tricky question, since “significantly” isn’t a very precise word, but I don’t think the odds that Bauer becomes a #3 starter are any higher than the odds that Cole does.
by epoc on Dec 21, 2025 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
Cliff Lee told me to ignore everything anyone says about pitcher ceilings.
by philosofool on Dec 22, 2025 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
Someone
should tell Cliff Lee that extreme exceptions don’t provide much predictive use.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 22, 2025 3:14 AM EST up reply actions
I think it is WAY
to early to say that Pedro Alvarez is the Pedro Alvarez of 3B, that is to say a top prospect that busted. This is the same guy that was the #8 prospect in baseball just two years ago. In 2010, he raked in AAA and was called up. After a horrible first 10 games adjusting to ML pitching, he finished the year by posing a .272/.345/.494 triple slash with 16 HR in 85 games (31 HR pace). He was absolutely horrible last year but he was also dealing with injuries most of the year and never really got a chance to adjust to what big league pitchers were doing to him. Could he repeat that train wreck this season and really call his future into question? Of course. At the same time, I really wouldn’t be surprised at all to see a .260/.340/.460 season with 25 HRs out of Petey next year.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 21, 2025 9:10 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Not actually affiliated with whygavs.
by WHYG Zane Smith on Dec 21, 2025 9:13 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
by Kosstic518 on Dec 22, 2025 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
I am on board with the Pirates approach to the draft to this point and now wish they would focus on some position players.
Part of me is wondering if the plan all along was to draft a lot HS pitchers after the 3rd round because they take a while to develop and then later add more position players to the fold.
What could greatly harm the Pirates is if Alvarez and Tony Sanchez do not turn out because that would be two wasted top 5 draft picks. If Pedro turns it around this year (and he may very well do that) the Pirates will be much better off.
by Cainyoudigit on Dec 21, 2025 11:23 AM EST reply actions
Alvarez
I have never been on the Alvarez bandwagon - I felt then, as I do now, that the Pirates should have drafted Hosmer instead. I don’t see Alvarez as a lineup anchor; I see him as closer to the new Dave Kingman than anything else. Too many swings and misses and failures to make adjustments to how he’s being pitched for my liking.
I think what bothers me most about the organization is that it doesn’t appear as though the minor league instruction has improved one bit since Huntington took over.
Mike Emeigh http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/minor_key/
by MikeE on Dec 21, 2025 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
I think the minor league instruction is hit or miss. You could look at Rudy Owens (except this year), Alex Presley, Robbie Grossman and Kyle Mcpherson as being positive developments.
I think it is hard to grade Huntington, his drafts and his development process until after this year or so, primarily because of the HS pitchers and the fastball approach. I think he has been somewhat lackluster at the major league acquisition phase (maybe Casey McGehee will fix that).
I also think they have gotten a little better at recognizing talent in the draft. The 2010 draft class had Kingham, Hafner, Allie, Taillon and a few guys who we didn’t sign (Weiss, Dace Kime, and Austin Kubitza) who all seem to have alot of talent.
by Cainyoudigit on Dec 21, 2025 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
add Walker and maybe Tabata also (was hitting .248 when we got him).
I’m not sure why people think only players drafted by Huntington count towards his player development record.
by Mr. E on Dec 22, 2025 2:39 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Completely agree, although if the Pirates could get a do-over, they’d probably go with Posey.
Never like Alvarez, big time beneficiary of the aluminum bat in college, and never showed a plus defensive tool.
He likely ends up at first base, and will end up a .240-,260 hitter with 25 homers and 180 strikeouts.
by Kelsdad on Dec 21, 2025 9:41 PM EST up reply actions
50/50 hindsight
I wish the Pirates would’ve gotten Eric Hosmer. 1st base problem solved.
by BadAndy on Dec 22, 2025 7:52 AM EST up reply actions
I felt Cole was overrated
Actually had him outside my top five from the ’11 draft, crazy as that may sound, and would “only” grade him out as a B+ right now. His underperformance really bothered me, he should have been striking out way more hitters against that level of competition. The philosophy which led them to pick Cole, I think, is the same one which led them to go hard after Allie the year before, and I think their drafting priorities when it comes to pitchers may be a little skewed.
I loved the Josh Bell pickup though. He’s a quality prospect and slots comfortably into the top 100 for me, following Taillon and Cole.
After those three, I think this system thins out a lot more than Pirates fans and some others would like to believe. I’m not sold on Marte as yet—his stock rose, but I still have questions about whether he’s an everyday regular—or Heredia, who is too young and raw for me to have a stable read on. It’s an okay system, but considering how close they’ve been to the top of the draft the past few years, I feel like it could be better than it is.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 21, 2025 11:48 AM EST reply actions
The Pirates should have drafted Bauer, IMO.
But only time will tell.
The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.
by Stupendous Man on Dec 21, 2025 12:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Jack, specifically
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on Dec 22, 2025 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
He had one stellar performance as a prep
Four TDs if memory serves. It buoyed his prospect status at the time considerably.
by Matt0330 on Dec 23, 2025 9:28 AM EST up reply actions
Revisionist History?
Actually had him outside my top five from the ’11 draft,
If you did, I’m pretty sure most people would have laughed at you. Cole was pretty much #1 or #2 on everyone’s, and I mean EVERYONE, draft board.
by JoelGuzman'sScout on Dec 21, 2025 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
Eh
not trying to take sides, but I could see people having him at #3 or #4 if they really liked Bundy or Bauer better, and didn’t buy into the Rendon health-scare.
He was #3 on my personal board
Rendon
Bundy
Cole
Although I wouldn’t have Rendon nearly that high after falling 5 spots. I think he has something seriously, seriously wrong with his shoulder.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
but the issue is the guy said he didn't have Cole IN HIS TOP 5
that’s just ridiculously wrong
by JoelGuzman'sScout on Dec 21, 2025 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
I don't
see how any opinion is “wrong” Brett Lawrie will probably end up as the best player in a stacked 2008 draft class, and he didn’t go until the teens. If I had put him in my top 5 on a draft board that year, I probably would have been crucified, but now I’d look like a genius.
Prospecting is to hit-or-miss and to fluid to hate on someone for not having a prospect in the consensus range. For example, I have Harper as my #3 prospect behind Trout and Moore, and I’m sticking to it.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 5:40 PM EST up reply actions
No
I actually wrote a week before the draft that I had him outside the top five. It was a stacked draft and there were simply guys I liked better. It’s strange to me how willing people are to ignore the issues with Cole’s consistency, command, and as a result, his mediocre (for a #1 overall pick) performance. I’m sorry, but size and stuff alone don’t cut it in MLB.
All of that said, he’s obviously an elite or near-elite prospect with fantastic upside.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 21, 2025 3:51 PM EST up reply actions
Would you trade next years Astros #1 pick for him?
Not knowing who they’ll take?
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 7:35 PM EST up reply actions
I'd have to think long and hard about it
But I’d lean toward “yes” right now. I have a feeling that may change as the draft approaches though.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 21, 2025 11:39 PM EST up reply actions
The strange thing about Cole
is that his 2011 season at UCLA was almost like two different seasons. The first half of the season he was absolutely filthy. People were already calling for him to be the #1 pick over Rendon (the consensus #1 coming in to the year) before the concerns over his shoulder came up at all. I saw people comparing him to Strasburg. His change was graded as an 80 by KLaw midseason. He had a plus slider and a triple digit fastball. Then, his second half didn’t really measure up to that. If nothing else, that fast start showed his potential. The ceiling for a guy with a 200 inning build, a 100 mph fastball, an elite change and a plus slider is substantially higher than anybody else in this draft IMO, and I really don’t think it’s all that close.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 21, 2025 9:21 PM EST up reply actions
I'm pretty sure
Most people would agree he has the highest upside of the pitchers from the draft.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 9:35 PM EST up reply actions
Bundy
would like to have a conversation with you, even if it’s brief.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 10:02 PM EST up reply actions
Ha maybe so
I prefer Bauer and Bundy as overall prospect (not by much though). But I still think most people would say Cole is the biggest pure upside guy. Maybe I’m wrong. Either way, those 3, plus several others from the draft are really good pitching prospects.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 11:22 PM EST up reply actions
I see him as being tied with Bundy for pure upside
As well as maybe Archie Bradley, who has a much lower floor than either of those guys.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 21, 2025 11:43 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sure you mean Bradley has a higher floor and agree, he's worth the wait
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Dec 22, 2025 12:49 AM EST up reply actions
Floor means current ability, as far as I'm concerned
Bradley’s current ability is below Cole’s or Bundy’s.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 22, 2025 12:59 AM EST up reply actions
Thank you so much for mentioning Cole's weird season
I found it very odd since in today’s day and age everyone likes to pinpoint performance (i.e. here is when this guy took off, here is where this guy dropped off, etc.) that no one talks about Cole’s season. The first half of the season, he and Bauer were just about the same. And then Cole started to get knocked around a bit, yet no one had an explanation. I’ve heard its a command issue, that hitters adjusted, that hitters were able to see the ball easily against him, all of these…but no one ever said his stuff dropped off. In fact, if it had, the Bucs probably wouldn’t have drafted him. My guess is, they think whatever caused the dropoff in performance is fixable and thats why they drafted him. I’m hoping they’re right.
by NastyNate82 on Dec 22, 2025 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
Potential Sleepers
Ryan Hafner, Tyler Glasnow (he is super tall), Jake Burnette (two sport athlete in high-school), Wes Freeman (could have finally figured it out), and Clay Holmes (probably not considered a sleeper).
by Cainyoudigit on Dec 21, 2025 11:58 AM EST reply actions
Another
sleeper to add. Alen Hanson. 2B/SS played in the GCL last year.
And a super deep sleeper. Dovydas Neverauskas. Starting pitcher out of Lithuania. Pitched in the GCL.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
He's still a ways away
but I’m pretty intrigued by Jose Osuna. He had a good showing in the GCL as an 18 year old and showed good power. He isn’t much of a defender at 1B but he doesn’t strike out much for a guy with good power which is always nice to see.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 21, 2025 9:24 PM EST up reply actions
He
put up some intriguing stats, that’s for sure. I thought he played OF some, even though 1B seems to be his likely destination?
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 10:03 PM EST up reply actions
He did
It was about a 50-50 split between the OF and 1B but his build and lack of mobility make him much more likely to wind up at first.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 22, 2025 12:16 AM EST up reply actions
Glasnow will be in our top 5 in 2 years, book it.
by Mr. E on Dec 22, 2025 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
Huntington
From the photo, is his plan a Blitzkrieg!? Seems like it ended with a Sieg Heil. Good thing he is in the Central and not the ‘East’.
by BryceHarper on Dec 21, 2025 11:58 AM EST reply actions
geez
‘he planning’. Hooked on phonics worked for me!
by BryceHarper on Dec 21, 2025 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
Position Players
the lack of position player depth is the main issue with the Pirates minor leagues.
The Pirates do have a strong group of outfielders from the Majors on down so the main issue is infielders. Outfield from the majors on down - McCutchen, Tabata, Presley, Gorkys Hernandez, Starling Marte, Robbie Grossman, Mel Rojas Jr., Wes Freeman etc..
It might be time to trade some outfielders.
by Cainyoudigit on Dec 21, 2025 12:02 PM EST reply actions
The
lack of position players to me is a false knock on the Pirates.
1. If you look at the major league team, the primary young, team/cost-controlled talent is McCutchen, Walker, Tabata, Alvarez, Morton, and McDonald. 4 of the 6 are positional players. In addition those four are younger, better, and team controlled for longer than their pitching counterparts. The Pirates need their farm system to be rich in pitching to complement their major league team, and it is, so in my eyes, perfect.
2. Of my top 7 prospects, 4 are hitters versus three pitchers. The hitters are Marte, Bell, Grossman, Sanchez, ranked at 3, 5, 6, and 7. Yes the top 2 are pitchers, but it’s not as skewed as one may think. Moving deeper, it’s still 5-5 after 10, and only 12-8 after 20.
You are right about the OF depth though, but I think we let them develop and wait one more year before considering any trades. The only guy who’s really blocked is Gorkys, so trying to trade him may be a very good idea although it is my only exception.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
I'm a little surprised to see everyone writing off Pedro
Lots of players have a bad sophomore season and we don’t write them off. I hope when he has a bounce back year, and he will, that people give him credit.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Dec 21, 2025 12:05 PM EST reply actions
I hope
so too, but just watching him actually take AB’s and looking at his ghastly K rate makes a Pirate fan sick.
He still doesn’t even have a full season of AB’s, so there is hope. This year will be big for the Pirates organization. If Pedro looks like a competent 3B (say -5.0 UZR) with the glove, and looks like he can put up a .260/.335/.510 line or so, then that will do wonders for the Pirates looking forward.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
Could be worse.
You could have Ian Stewart as your starting 3B.
by odbsol on Dec 22, 2025 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
Good
point! Although Pedro is two seasons away from Stewart levels
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 22, 2025 5:34 PM EST up reply actions
if the Pirates have any shot of breaking the 20 year losing season in 2012
Pedro MUST bounce back.
If Pedro struggles again losing 90+ is a near certainly once again.
by BadAndy on Dec 21, 2025 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
As
far as returning the team to competitiveness, it’s actually fairly simple when it comes to the general philosophy needed.
1. Re-sign McCutchen. Easier said then done, but get at least one of his free agency years, if not two. That’s absolutely crucial. Right now McCutchen will become a free agent after the 2015 season, which is when, optimistically, the Pirates will just start being a contender in the NL Central. Looking at guys like Marte, Sanchez, Grossman, Cole, and Taillon, the 2015 season is really when that collection of prospects will have been in the majors for a year or two (or just be arriving) and be ready to make an impact. Adding Cutch through 2016 or 2017 would extend the “window” for the Pirates and give them a realistic shot at a playoff birth in the next half decade.
In that same vein, I think the Pirates should not trade Cutch under any circumstances unless a team just offers an absurdly good proposal. I’m talking the Rangers offering Profar, Perez, Martin, Olt, Neil Ramirez, and Cody Buckel or something like that. Keep him through 2015 and sell the farm similar to what the Brewers did this year if need be. Then, try and resign him after 2015, and if he walks, he walks.
2. Along that same line, DO NOT trade away any of the farm, at least any top 8 pieces, for the next year or two. As depressing as it sounds to Pirates fans, the window I’m looking at for serious, pre-season on paper contention, is 2014-2016. (I think/hope the Pirates could surprise some people in the next two years, but when I look at our team on paper I do not see a playoff team or even close. One addition, such as Gio Gonzalez or Ike Davis will not change that). The Pirates need to wait a year or two to see what they have in Cole, Taillon, Marte, and Sanchez. Then, before the 2014 season if it looks like it’s the time, trade guys like Josh Bell, Luis Heredia, and Robbie Grossman to fill some hole, a hole that its clear what it is.
3. Keep drafting and signing international players. Be aggressive as possible, but stay under the cap.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 12:07 PM EST reply actions
You would never get that package for Cutch
1 A, 3 B+, 2 B- is way too much for anyone but the best. I offered a suggested trade with the Braves, centered around Vizcaino, Minor, Simmons, plus a few further away C+ types. Or you could switch out Viz and Minor for Teheran and Delgado.
To me, this would be about as good as you could expect. Given your Rangers proposal, I could see Olt, Perez, Martin, Ramirez as a reasonable trade. But if you want Profar, you might get Martin and Ramirez with him.
by cookiedabookie on Dec 21, 2025 3:21 PM EST up reply actions
I don't disagree
and I wouldn’t even consider taking either of those offers if I were the Pirates GM.
I think the “lowest” I could take that could actually happen would be Profar, Olt, Martin, Ramirez, and Justin Grimm or something like that. I can’t recall a team trading a guy as valuable as Cutch in my memory. Miggy Cabrera and D-Train come close, and the Marlins got a hell of a return; it just didn’t pan out.
Also, I feel like if anything else, the Pirates should keep him for the next 2 years, continue to try and extend him, and then if they are out of contention before 2014, then trade him. He will still have two years of control left and would still command a huge return.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 5:36 PM EST up reply actions
1 A, 3 B+, 2 B- is way too much for anyone but the best.
Who would you consider the best?
Cutch came in at #6 on Dave Cameron’s trade value list this year.
He was also #2 behind only Justin Upton on Klaw’s top 50 talents under age 25. You can’t really get much better.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 5:38 PM EST up reply actions
When was the last trade for one player that netted that much talent?
by cookiedabookie on Dec 21, 2025 8:48 PM EST up reply actions
Never
and that’s why trades like that don’t happen. That’s why Cutch won’t be traded, at least for a few years. If he is traded this offseason, it will and should shatter trades in terms of the prospect package going the other way.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 9:58 PM EST up reply actions
I really think we need to re-evaluate the role of projected value of salary-controlled players in trades
You’re exactly right: if you go completely by projected future value and refuse to take any less than that for Cutch, nobody will match that price. At the same time, if he’s not presently contributing to a winning Pirates team, doesn’t stand to do so before he gets very expensive, and is approaching his peak performance years, a good argument can be made that he’s really not doing the Pirates all that much good, or at least as much good as he can do as the centerpiece of a trade.
There is a lot to be said for taking a conservative track and making sure you get the best deal, but at the same time the sooner you put players into the pipeline, the sooner you’ll get them to the majors. It’s a tricky balance for the Pirates - maybe they’ll want to hold Cutch a little longer (perhaps until they have a viable in-system replacement), but unless they’re planning on making him a ridiculously awesome extension offer in the not-too-distant future, a trade should probably happen sooner rather than later.
by mrkupe on Dec 22, 2025 1:01 AM EST up reply actions
but unless they’re planning on making him a ridiculously awesome extension offer in the not-too-distant future, a trade should probably happen sooner rather than later.
Completely disagree. He’s insanely valuable to them going forward. I’m extremely confident in arguing I’d rather get 4 years out of him and 2 draft picks than any realistic package the Pirates could get for him right now.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 22, 2025 2:58 AM EST up reply actions
okay then, let's hear it
What makes him “insanely valuable”? Yes, he is a very good player . . .a very good player on a very mediocre team. The difference makers in that system are years away from getting to the majors, let alone establishing themselves as consistent positive contributors. If Cutch is going to be part of a resurgent Pirates team, it’s almost certainly not going to happen without a contract extension.
Having a player as valuable as McCutchen is, holding him while his trade value dissipates as he plays extremely well for a well below .500 team, and only getting 2 draft picks for him would be a disaster for the Pirates. It makes much more sense to trade him soon, get known properties rather than hoping for the best out of a couple of draft picks, and strengthen the org’s chances of a successful re-emergence in 3-4 years. As is, they’re just setting themselves up for more of the same.
by mrkupe on Dec 22, 2025 3:46 AM EST up reply actions
Not to sound like a homer
but you won’t find many Pirates fans that truly believe this team can’t compete within the next four years. With Cutch, the Pirates already have an excellent defensive OF who can hit 3rd in any lineup. Tabata, if healthy, is incredibly talented and has the ability to be a .300 hitter. Neil Walker is an above average 2nd baseman. Many still hold out hope that Tony Sanchez will be a major league catcher some time in 2012 and a starter by 2013. A resurgence by Pedro Alvarez gives the Pirates a legit middle of the lineup bat. Alex Presley has looked intriguing and top hitting prospect Starling Marte (who is good enough defensively he could move ‘Cutch to PNC’s massive LF) should be in Pittsburgh this year. James McDonald and Charlie Morton are both really good when they are on and last year was their first as full time starters. Kyle McPherson could be up as soon as this year and an optimistic timeline has Cole in Pittsburgh by June 2013. That’s not a bad group to have Andrew McCutchen in the middle of. If the team can get even a 2-year extension out of him, he’d be here long enough for that core to really run it’s course.
If, over the next two years, enough of that group flames out that it is clear this group won’t be able to contend, it might make sense to deal him with 2 years left (assuming they can’t get him to extend). To do it now, though, would be to assume beforehand that this group of players-the same one that was in first place at the end of July, despite a disappearing act by Pedro, injuries to Tabata, Presley and Doumit, and zero production from a FA 1B-has no shot. I don’t think that’s a logical next move for this organization. As far as what would be a fair return, with this much time left on a guy’s contract, the Pirates couldn’t afford to take anything less than max value. If they accept a good but not great deal for two top prospects and two good ones, they run too much of a risk that they see Jason Bay redux. Not only that, what message does it send to fans, the players on the team and other organizations around the league that the Pirates have no problem trading their best asset in 20 years for less than fair value? With this fanbase, the team can’t risk that.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 22, 2025 7:25 AM EST up reply actions
this all sounds terribly optimistic
Tabata is a decent regular and I’ve long been a Neil Walker fan, but there are still a ton of issues. Sanchez has injury problems and a questionable bat even when healthy. Alvarez isn’t nearly as bad as he was last year (how could he be?), but it’s hard to see him playing much beyond average in the best case - he’s an abyss at 3B and at 1B his bat is meh. Marte is a nice piece, although I don’t think there’s any chance that the Pirates move Cutch to a corner (good way to ding the guy’s trade value). The pitching staff is a bunch of No. 4 starters who might play up a little more than that. I’m going to take a hold on Morton for the moment - didn’t miss bats last year, and tore his labrum.
I just can’t see why Cutch would take any kind of extension at this point, especially a short one. Those are typically signed by high risk players (usually pitchers) who want the guaranteed money, while McCutchen has no worries there. He’s going to get paid, and there’s really no good reason for him to delay entering the open market. Besides, would Pittsburgh even be willing to give him the money he’d need to cover a couple years beyond free agency - perhaps a small discount, so something like $16-$18M/year?
The Tabata extension last year put the writing on the wall, I think. I’m sure McCutchen was the team’s top priority re: extensions, so it seems awfully telling that he didn’t get one and another of the team’s outfielders (a decidedly lesser one) did. I will agree, it makes sense for the Pirates to take some time to make sure they are getting a great deal. It just doesn’t make sense for them to wait TOO long and allow his trade value to drain away to the point that they end up with a lesser package than they might have otherwise obtained.
by mrkupe on Dec 22, 2025 8:41 AM EST up reply actions
If trading him now nets a Latos return, and trading him three years from now nets an Adrian Gonzalez or Halladay-to-the-Jays return, it makes far less sense to deal him now than to keep him for three years, try to build around him and extend him, and then deal him in a few years if they can’t win with him or extend him. You have to balance the odds that you can win with Cutch in the next four years against the odds that the difference between a current trade return and a future trade return will be the difference-maker in some future window. It’s virtually impossible to calculate the odds of the latter, and the odds of the latter would have to be obviously better than the odds of the former, since you’re giving up the best player and the only sure thing in the trade (assuming Cutch for prospects is what we’re discussing here).
Personally, I don’t see any reasonable argument for trading Cutch in the next couple years. If, in two years, it still seems like the Pirates can’t win with Cutch, then at that point they can still trade him for a ridiculous return. But keeping him for two years, trying to extend him, and seeing if you can develop the pieces around him to contend is far more valuable than getting an extra B+ prospect right now.
by epoc on Dec 22, 2025 11:28 AM EST up reply actions
I don't think the Tabata extension is telling
It’s not going to tie up any money that could be used for extending Cutch — Tabata is basically being paid like a fourth outfielder for the guaranteed years of the contract (and the option years are pretty team-friendly too).
Not actually affiliated with whygavs.
by WHYG Zane Smith on Dec 22, 2025 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
The Tabata extension last year put the writing on the wall, I think. I’m sure McCutchen was the team’s top priority re: extensions, so it seems awfully telling that he didn’t get one and another of the team’s outfielders (a decidedly lesser one) did.
I’d argue the opposite. The general feeling around Pittsburgh when Tabata signed his extension was that it was done to encourage Cutch to resign by proving the Pirates were willing to commit money longterm. NH also admitted as much.
I also think historically it’s very clear a player can bring in a similar haul if they have two years of control versus four years. Look at Hunter Pence last year. McCutchen, on the merits of his talent alone, would have brought in another top 100 prospect more than Pence, and that prospect would probably have to be a top 25 guy. That’s 1 top 25 prospect, two more top 100 guys, and a C+/B- guy in Santana. If the Pirates absolutely had to trade McCutchen today, I’d live with that return. It seems that’s also the type of return non-Pirates (and therefore more objective) fans are calling for right now. So why would the Pirates trade McCutchen now for a package that is very similar to what they could get in two years.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 22, 2025 1:03 PM EST up reply actions
Not to be a dick
but there is a lot of what you said that I just think is flat out wrong. First of all, how is Tabata nothing more than a decent regular? He hit .300 in the major leagues as a 21-year old. He hit .300 everywhere he went through the minor leagues. He’s an above average defender and has good speed. The biggest ding on him was that he didn’t walk much and last year he bumped his BB rate up to 10.5%. He didn’t produce as hoped last year but he was also struggling with hamstring problems. Oh yeah, he’ll also only be 23 next year. If all you can say about that is he’s a decent regular, I think you have crazy standards.
Tony Sanchez has injury problems? Really, like what? His injury problems have pretty much been limited to getting hit in the face by a pitch. That’s not an injury problem, that’s just bad luck. He was healthy this year, he was just underweight because of the requisite liquid diet and that sapped a lot of his strength.
It’s hard to see how Alvarez can play above average even in the best case? Are you kidding? So Pedro’s struggles during an injury plagued 2011 against ML pitching is something that he couldn’t possibly ever come back from but Eric Hosmer’s awful 2009 is of course nothing to worry about. To say that a player can’t be better than average a year after being an elite prospect because of a down year is just foolish and baseless.
As far as moving, or not moving McCutchen because it will hurt his trade value, that won’t matter if the Pirates don’t plan on trading him. If Marte in center and Cutch in left makes the Pirates a better team, they will do it.
You say that players like McCutchen don’t sign extensions. What about Jay Bruce, Justin Upton, Nick Markakis, Carlos Gonzalez and Carl Crawford (he extended then hit FA after the extension ran out. This is not to say that Cutch definitely will extend but it’s certainly not impossible.
You say that extending Tabata was somehow the “writing on the wall” indicating that Cutch is gone. How is this true at all? Even if Tabata’s contract is paid out in full, he only gets $37.5M over 9 years. The Pirates didn’t sign that deal instead of signing McCutchen they did it because Tabata desperately wants to be a Pirate forever (he idolizes Clemente) and he wanted to sign a contract that was so team friendly his agent quit rather than signing off on it. It is also cheap enough that it, in no way, would prohibit the team from signing McCutchen or anybody else for that matter.
Finally, I’m not saying cling to McCutchen for dear life until he has no value left, I’m saying that he doesn’t need to be traded any time soon. Hunter Pence, a lesser player than McCutchen was dealt with a year and a half left and landed two top 100 prospects. Two months of a 34 year old Carlos Beltran got Zack Wheeler. Dealing McCutchen now is throwing in the towel on a group of players that still has a lot of time and a lot of potential. Dealing him in 2 years (if this group doesn’t reach its potential) could still bring a great return and it wouldn’t require punting on their next two seasons just to command 2 additional B prospects in return.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 22, 2025 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
okay
1. Tabata IS a decent regular. When healthy in 2010, he put up a 2.1 WAR. Last year, hindered by injury, a 1.0. He’s a good hitter who hits the ball hard but doesn’t have much in the way of power numbers . . .seems pretty fair to say that good health permitting, he should continue to be in the 2-3 WAR range, making him a “decent regular”. So, chill.
2. I agree, getting hit in the face IS bad luck for Tony Sanchez. He’s also got a shoulder worth keeping an eye on. The weight issue with him is a little concerning - he hasn’t been on a liquid diet in a year and a half AFAIK. I think Kevin Goldstein’s ranking of Sanchez as a two star prospect gives a pretty good idea of how he’s considered, injury and all.
3. No, I am not kidding about Alvarez. I don’t know what Eric Hosmer has to do with any of this, so I’ll set that aside. Alvarez certainly has some time to improve (when did I say he could never do that?), but there are a lot of flags. Conditioning has always been an issue and he’s a terrible fielder at 3B. He has a ton of swing and miss in his game - even in 2010 he struck out swinging in 22.5 percent of his ABs (MLB average: 13.1 percent). He put up a 1.6 WAR in 95 games in 2010, making him another “decent regular” performer in that one season, albeit one with shaky strike zone judgment. So where am I going wrong in my thinking? He’s a de facto first baseman with an erratic at best bat coming off a terrible season.
4. Trading McCutchen is always going to be a possibility unless he gets extended. And he is MUCH more valuable (both literally and ancedotally) as a center fielder than a left fielder. There are also plenty of examples of teams keeping established players in their long-term positions, even when evidence and/or superior defenders are in abundance. So, I’ll believe it when I see it.
5. A couple of good examples there; there are always exceptions I suppose. Most of those guys signed WAY below market value, though - especially Bruce, who is probably his best comparable. I’d think that if McCutchen were willing to do the same, he’d already be signed. Worth noting: none of those players signed short-term contracts.
6. Obviously the Pirates have a limited budget. As you mentioned, they have several talented outfielders on the way up. There are only so many places to put these guys, and I have a hard time believing that they’re going to lock up both payroll and roster slots with long-term contract extensions on two outfielders. This isn’t a team that should be operating with the expectation of selling off their prospects, and I think they recognize that. And if you’re going to choose one, Tabata (wants to be on the team, took under market value) makes a lot more sense for what the Pirates have to work with than McCutchen (probably not taking much if any under market value). I can understand why they wouldn’t publicly dismiss the possibility of retaining both, but it just doesn’t seem to make much sense.
7. I think we’re mostly on the same page here with this one. The Beltran deal was terrible, I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect that rate of return. My main point is that the sooner a deal is made, the easier it is to get players that will emerge during that window 3-4 years down the line. Trading McCutchen in the next year or two means getting players who should be ready in that 3-4 year window (when the last couple of loaded draft classes should be getting established). Trading him in 3.5 years means getting players who are going to trail that window a bit. Holding him to free agency and taking draft picks for him means you’re waiting 4-6 years after the fact for a return.
by mrkupe on Dec 22, 2025 6:05 PM EST up reply actions
While
I was probably a little harsh with my comments, my general point was that if my predictions above were a little optimistic, I think yours were really pessimistic. You pretty much assumed that none of the players the Pirates are putting their hopes on (Tabata, Sanchez, Pedro) will improve at all despite having age, talent and track records on their side. Maybe all three don’t pan out but I think it’s equally unlikely that none of them do.
The only thing point that you made that I can’t even pretend to agree with is that Tabata’s extension will prevent them from signing McCutchen. During the five remaining years that the Pirates are locked into Tabata (the last 3 years are options) the most that they have to pay him is $4.5M. That is the amount of money that the Pirates would pay any mediocre aging free agent outfielder to fill in for a year so I don’t see how it has any chance of limiting another player’s contract.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 22, 2025 7:29 PM EST up reply actions
not quite what I said
Tabata is the safest of the three and probably the best bet to improve a bit. I think his upside is a little limited (not much power, and speed is likely to erode), but no doubt he is a very good hitter. 2-3 WAR player going forward assuming good health. Perhaps he’ll find more in his game, but I think that is a reasonable expectation.
Sanchez is a catcher who has always had some questions about the future projection of his bat. His good performance in the lower minors gives some hope, but at the same time I don’t think we should be surprised if his bat doesn’t really progress. Lots of young catchers see their offensive development stagnate. I don’t think you can necessarily say that raw talent is on his side there. He’s clearly the riskiest of the three.
Alvarez is the wild card. Tons of power obviously, but conditioning, consistency of approach and swing-and-miss in his game have long been lingering issues. He had a good but not great 2010 season at the plate, but he struck out over 30 percent of the time, and nobody should have been surprised to see him struggle the second time around even had he been healthy. He has pretty good upside with the bat, but obviously his defensive issues compromise much of the value he can generate at the plate. The offensive talent might be on his side, but I don’t see any of the others being so. I think it is reasonable to expect him to find his way back to being a decent regular. I just don’t see where you can reasonably expect him to get beyond that . . .he has some pretty big holes in his game that drain his value, and at 25, he doesn’t have THAT much time to close them.
Finally, as for Tabata’s extension . . .I don’t see the financial aspect of his deal being an issue. More like I have a hard time believing that even with the deal the Pirates got that extending McCutchen wasn’t the priority. And if he can’t be extended, then it makes all the sense in the world for the Pirates to secure Tabata long-term. It’s a read-between-the-lines move, not one that literally deprives the Pirates of resources to sign Cutch.
Perhaps I will be proven wrong, but I struggle to see what will work here for both sides. It’s unlikely that Cutch is taking a crazy discount and I’ll believe the Pirates will pay franchise-player money to anybody for any amount of time when I see it.
by mrkupe on Dec 23, 2025 7:22 AM EST up reply actions
I feel like this has become
a really circular argument and I think it’s probably pretty likely that we just won’t agree on any of these things. To close, I will just reiterate that the way I read and re-read you comments it does seem like it is your assumption that none of the three will pan out and I think that is wrong.
You assume that Tabata is capable of being a 2-3 WAR player. While that obviously is not the same as busting, that is saying that he won’t be any better at 23, 25 or 28 than he was when he was 21. Given that he already greatly improved his plate patience this past year, I don’t think that is a fair expectation. Clearly you do, but I disagree.
Yes, there were some concerns about Sanchez bat but not about his defense. Furthermore, as a catcher, Sanchez doesn’t have to be a great hitter to be very valuable if he is good defensively. The fact that he was very successful in his first two years does provide a some hope going forward. The fact that even last year he didn’t look overmatched at the plate and kept up solid BB:K rates still makes it seem as if his bat could bounce back. I also believe that the weightloss could easily explain his lack of power in ‘11. I know he was not on a liquid diet during the season but he was not able to gain back all of the weight he lost before the year started and players almost never gain weight during the season. Even if he was back to eating solid foods, he ran out of time to get himself back in playing shape before the year started so the effects of the jaw were still there. This is not to say that I feel confident that Sanchez will match his A+ numbers in the bigs but I see no reason that he can’t be Yadier Molina. Maybe that doesn’t make him a superstar but it would solidify the catching position for 6 years.
As for Pedro, well first of all, I think he got a bad shake going into last season in some respects. There was one report (ONE) from the middle of last offseason that said Petey looked out of shape and everybody jumped all over him for a lack of conditioning. Then by all accounts, he showed up to spring training in good shape but when his production dropped, people jumped all over him as being lazy and out of shape. That one tweet from January irrationally trumped all reports to the contrary. Ultimately, I just disagree that one season can change Pedro’s upside that much. As I said above (or somewhere else on this thread) it wouldn’t surprise me if Pedro rebounds this year with a .260/.350/.470 line, albeit with a boatload of K’s. Since is is poor defensively, that still probably leaves him as no better than a 3 WAR player which would make him above average but not by much. My contention with Pedro is that you claim this to be “the best case.” All the talent that landed Pedro as the #8 prospect in baseball going into a productive 2010 is still there. Even if it isn’t terribly likely, I think that the “best case” for Pedro would have to be slightly higher and make him a 4-5 WAR player. Maybe I’m just arguing semantics with the whole “best case” issue but that’s what really caught me.
Finally with Tabata, you correctly point out that it “makes all the sense in the world” to sign Tabata if they can’t extend ‘Cutch but you ignore that it would also make sense if they could extend Cutch. It would make sense if they wanted to trade Tabata or keep him or bench him or use him as a 4th OF or pretty much anything else. The deal was so team friendly that it would have been idiotic not to sign it regardless of what else it could do, wanted to do, planned to do or hoped to do. Maybe the Pirates don’t extend ’Cutch but I believe that a 6 year $50-60M deal would make sense and be fair for both sides. It would also fit into the financial guidelines that Pirates management has public claimed it can afford.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 23, 2025 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
Do you think
that 6/50 mil would get it done for Cutch? If memory serves, I think thats what Upton got…I’d have to assume that Cutch might get a little more being a CF. That might be where the disagreements might come between him and management. I’m not taking either’s side (since there are no numbers that have been released publicly) it just makes me wonder what numbers are in mind for him.
by NastyNate82 on Dec 23, 2025 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
just to clarify
My opinion of the future of these three players is:
Tabata: consistently solid player, but not more than that save maybe a peak season
Sanchez: lower tier starter or quality backup type. Don’t think he’ll hit enough to do more than that. But still, potential starter, I would consider that relatively optimistic.
Alvarez: here’s the one I’m pessimistic on. Not enough glove for 3B, skeptical that his bat will be consistent enough or productive enough for 1B. His conditioning has been a question going back to his HS days, when skepticism about his future position played a role in sending him to Vanderbilt. He was also said to be out of shape when he originally got into pro ball.
In 2009, Alvarez hit .256/.326/.461, pretty close to what you were suggesting with the exception of walks. Over 95 games his WAR was 1.6, so a return to that form over a full season would put him at only a 2.3-2.5 WAR. I doubt his defense is getting better. I’m just not really sure why I should be optimistic about him . . .he’s a one tool player with serious contact problems and considerable defensive limitations. There is a place for him to contribute, but I think overall above-average performance from him should probably go into the “pleasant surprise” category, not the “to be expected” category.
by mrkupe on Dec 23, 2025 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
Not to pile on but
Morton tore the labrum in his hip, not his right arm
by Mr. E on Dec 22, 2025 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
thanks, my bad
Still not a minor surgery, but acceptable. Will be very interesting to see if he can survive with that kind of strikeout rate.
by mrkupe on Dec 22, 2025 6:10 PM EST up reply actions
It would be an absurdly huge return
But I’m not that far off in terms of “value.” If you project Cutch’s next four years using this season’s production 5.7 fWAR and assume that he’ll match Prince Fielder’s salary over the last four years ($34M) by going to arbitration each year, he would be worth about $80.7M over the next four years. Profar is going to be an 11-25 hitting prospect ($25.1M), Perez is probably still a top 50 pitching prospect ($15.9M). Let’s say Martin and Olt are 76-100 hitting prospects ($12.5M each). Ramirez and Buckel are B grade pitchers ($7.3M each). If you add it all up, that package is worth $80.6M. You’re correct in saying that there hasn’t really been a single player who got that kind of trade return, but there also hasn’t been a player on McCutchen’s level dealt with four years of control left either…
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 21, 2025 9:53 PM EST up reply actions
Bell = Stud
Love the old CBA. Only way we sign him is the ability to go overslot. New agreement kills small market’s ability to sign these guys in places like Pittsburgh.
by ByANose on Dec 21, 2025 12:10 PM EST reply actions
I've been saying since
they drafted Alvarez, they have the second coming of Kevin Young. He will develop slowly but he has the skills to be a good hitter at least. The question is if they can be that patient. I hope they do.
I don’t see Cole becoming an ace. I see him as a #2 or 3 on a top level club. He will flash dominance but be too hittable to do it regularly.
MLB Bonus Baby MLB Draft Prospects
MiLB Prospects
by Matt Garrioch on Dec 21, 2025 12:18 PM EST reply actions
Kevin Young didn't break out
until he was 28 and was released then resigned with the Pirates.
They won’t be that patience with Pedro. He is out of options beginning next season.
That makes the Casey McGehee trade all the more necessary (provided he bounces back from his horrible 2011 season).
by BadAndy on Dec 21, 2025 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
Curious about Kyle McPherson
BA ranked him ahead of Tony Sanchez and Robbie Grossman. I would have thought he’d be a B-/B, but maybe he’s more of a straight B (still lower end). Those control guys are tough to really evaluate, but I’ve seen some indications that he has a decent upside as well as floor.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 12:54 PM EST reply actions
Personally
not a big fan, but McPherson backers see him as having the makings of three plus pitches with excellent command. That’s #2 upside, with #4 floor probably. Personally, he just screams too much of Rudy Owens, who also had a velocity spike in his AA year, and I was always wary of Owens.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 21, 2025 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
McPherson
I watched McPherson a lot in the NYPL. i even got the chance to talk with him when he was charting pitches in the stands a couple times. The guy is massive. He reminds me of a Don Robinson, only more athletic and chiseled. He struck me as a student of the game and a tireless worker. He certainly has an explosive and moving fastball, but I really think he needs to find success with his offspeed stuff, otherwise, he’s destined for the pen. As determined and hard working as he is, I wouldn’t be shocked if he finds that pitch and becomes an innings horse in the future rotation. Nick Kingham is very similar, but McPherson’s physical presence and mental make-up appears to be ahead of Kingham.
by Karp62 on Dec 21, 2025 3:30 PM EST reply actions
BA
Says he has the best changeup in the organization, so it certainly isn’t all fastball. Maybe his breaking stuff needs work though.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 3:33 PM EST up reply actions
Then you’ll be the one who tells him he has to move to the pen.
by NastyNate82 on Dec 23, 2025 9:07 AM EST up reply actions
good and will get better
I think the is very exciting times for pirate fans. For the first time in a very long time the system has both elite talent and fair depth. But, I think the most exciting part is that the system isn’t at “capacity” yet. No real prospect should graduate to the majors this year, that means you have another whole draft to add talent (#8 pick plus 1-2 comp picks). Only after next year will they get to the point where the draft had to replace talent as it graduates to the big leagues.
by Bucsfan1978 on Dec 21, 2025 4:02 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Marte
is pretty likely to play in Pittsburgh this year and could open 2013 in the Pirates’ outfield. Sanchez could also make the jump if he rebounds from a down 2011.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 21, 2025 9:56 PM EST up reply actions
Starling Marte has the batting approach
of Baltimore’s Adam Jones and the defense of Franklin Gutierrez. Marte can certainly be a .300 20HR+ guy with a few gold gloves (depending on the Pirates standing).
His defense is certainly his strong suit. He goes line to line like a gazelle.
He is more suited to CF at PNC Park than Cutch ever would.
A future 4-5 WAR guy (2 on his D alone!)
by BadAndy on Dec 22, 2025 8:03 AM EST up reply actions
I think you forgot "the looks of a Dominican Brad Pitt"
by mrkupe on Dec 22, 2025 8:43 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Not sure if sarcastic
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 22, 2025 8:51 AM EST up reply actions
Ha
I vote no on the sarcastic and yes on hyperbole
by Drufan11 on Dec 22, 2025 12:37 PM EST up reply actions
Definitely
not hyperbole or sarcasm. Starling Marte can easily be a .300, 20 HR guy with plus, plus defense. That’s pretty much spot on as an optimistic scouting report for Marte, say a 85% of his ceiling. Now, it’s important to note that his .300 average will only translate to a .340 OBP, but he can still be a consistent 4 WAR player in the big leagues. Clearly he also has a fairly decent bust rate with his plate discipline “issues” (which I believe to be overstated, but they do exist).
I’d seriously question one’s knowledge of Marte at all if they believe otherwise.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 22, 2025 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
I can buy .280, 15 HR, above average defense for CF
As a maximum ceiling. I’m not buying into him having the ceiling of one of the top players in baseball. The player BadAndy described is not a 4-5 WAR guy it’s more like an 6-8 WAR guy.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 22, 2025 2:22 PM EST up reply actions
Jones has averaged about 3 oWAR the last 2 years, Gutierrez has averaged ~1.7 dWAR last 3 years. That looks like 4-5 WAR to me
by Mr. E on Dec 22, 2025 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
Above-average
defense? Not sure what scouting reports you’ve been looking at. Marte could be a plus defensive CF in the majors right now.
To each their own though. Time will tell who’s right and I selfishly hope it’s me :P
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 22, 2025 5:37 PM EST up reply actions
John
Did you delete your comments about Cole? I was going back to double check what you wrote, but now I can’t find them.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 6:59 PM EST reply actions
Nevermind
It was A.J. Cole comments in the other thread.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 21, 2025 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
Jordy Mercer
He seems like he might be an overlooked guy. He seems to have a legit SS glove (Brian Cartwright’s OLIVER system loves him), and last year he hit 19 home runs across AA and AAA, in what I think aren’t overly hitter-friendly environments.
Admittedly he was repeating AA at 24, and I wouldn’t say he’s any kind of top prospect, but as a guy who’s close to the majors and who might already be ready to step in as a utility guy, I think he ought to be in the organization discussion. Seems like he’s one more breakthrough away from being a very useful player.
Not actually affiliated with whygavs.
by WHYG Zane Smith on Dec 21, 2025 9:10 PM EST reply actions
+1
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
by Kosstic518 on Dec 22, 2025 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
also, just for a laugh, check out RInku Singh's K/BB in the Australian Baseball League
here
Not actually affiliated with whygavs.
by WHYG Zane Smith on Dec 21, 2025 9:11 PM EST reply actions
Sleepers?
Ramon Cabrera and Elevys Gonzalez. Dont know much about them, but their stats and ARL look good.
Someone already mentioned Jose Osuna.
by rhd on Dec 22, 2025 12:52 AM EST reply actions
fringe players
i’d like to get your thoughts on Mike Colla, Phil Irwin, and Nate Baker. And a word on Lorin, if possible, even though he isn’t a Pirate at this point (I admit to having been lazy and not having checked if Lorin was on the AZ list.
by BurgherKing on Dec 22, 2025 1:16 AM EST reply actions
I think a lot of people are going to be down on Tony Sanchez, but I'd still bet he becomes a league average catcher
He had one below average season coming off of a significant injury and people are already calling him a bust at 23. I think he deserves at least 2 more years before we call him a bust, and I’d easily rank him in the Pirates top 10 prospects.
Should the Pirates keep Neal Huntington?
http://www.bucsdugout.com/2011/5/16/2174135/poll-should-huntington-be-retained
by Kosstic518 on Dec 22, 2025 11:34 AM EST reply actions
I think the best sign
for a bounceback from Sanchez is that his injury is not something that is chronic at all (unless you think something about him makes him especially likely to be hit in the face by pitches) and the damage from that injury (substantial weightloss) is easily correctable and can explain his biggest weakness from his lousy 2011.
by KentuckyPirate on Dec 22, 2025 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
I think our depth is underrated but we also had a lot of prospects take a step back in performance in 2011.
by Mr. E on Dec 22, 2025 3:16 PM EST reply actions
Agreed
Unfortunately, a lot of the “top” guys were the guys who took steps back, like Sanchez. In the meantime, guys who were in the background, like McPherson took steps forward. I am a little leery of the Bucs position players in the system beyond Marte…Sanchez is coming off a rough year (although he maintained good plate discipline), Grossman just broke his hamate bone, and with Bell, I kind of don’t like to heap praise on a guy who was just drafted until we’ve seen him play.
The pitching though…I think can be pretty darn good. Kingham, who flew under the radar in the 2010 draft, really looks like he could come on pretty strongly. As in, he might fly by the bonus baby class of 2009.
by NastyNate82 on Dec 23, 2025 9:13 AM EST up reply actions

by John Sickels on 












