Prospects in the Mat Latos Trade
Prospects in the Mat Latos Trade
On Saturday, December 17th, the San Diego Padres traded starting pitcher Mat Latos to the Cincinnati Reds for pitcher Edinson Volquez and three prospects: first baseman Yonder Alonso, catcher Yasmani Grandal, and pitcher Brad Boxberger.
The Padres farm system was already stacked, but the addition of these three prospects makes it outstanding indeed. Alonso is getting most of the attention so far, but Boxberger and Grandal are also highly-intriguing prospects. Let's take a look at the haul of talent.
Yonder Alonso, 1B: A star first baseman for the University of Miami Hurricanes, Alonso was one of the best hitters available in the 2008 draft and went seventh-overall. Although he was dogged by some injury problems in the minors, Alonso's bat is highly-regarded, featuring above-average power and superior strike zone judgment. He hit a solid .296/.374/.486 in 358 at-bats for Triple-A Louisville in 2011, but was truly outstanding during his major league trial, hitting .330/.398/.545 in 88 at-bats for the Reds. Blocked by Joey Votto in Cincinnati, he is a definite first baseman, lacking the speed or mobility to handle the outfield. His bat is ready for the majors now. Does he compete with Anthony Rizzo for the first base job? Or are there more trades to come for San Diego? Stay tuned.
Brad Boxberger, RHP: Boxberger was a supplemental first round pick in 2009 from the University of Southern California. He struggled in 2010, but turned things around in '11 with a fine season in Double-A and Triple-A, posting a combined 2.03 ERA with a 93/28 K/BB in 62 innings, allowing a mere 32 hits. Note his exceptional K/IP and H/IP ratios. Boxberger has a 92-95 MPH fastball and an above-average slider. A former starter, he will toss an occasional changeup but relies primarily on his harder pitches. He fanned 22 in just 13 innings in the Arizona Fall League. Some scouts see him as a future closer if his command is good enough, and at worst he'll be a solid middle reliever.
Yasmani Grandal, C: Like Alonso, Grandal was a star at the University of Miami, turning his college performance into a first-round selection, going 12th overall in 2010. He was quite successful in '11, hitting a combined .305/.401/.500 with 14 homers and 59 walks in 374 at-bats between High-A, Double-A, and Triple-A. A switch-hitter, Grandal has very good plate discipline and above-average power. He needs polish on defense, needing to improve his blocking, but he has a decent arm, threw out 34% of runners, and shows some leadership skills. He should be a solid defender with a potent bat. Like Alonso, Grandal was blocked in Cincinnati, ranking behind fellow top prospect Devin Mesoraco.
This seems like a trade that will help both teams, although in different ways. The Reds didn't have room for Alonso and they like Mesoraco slightly better than Grandal. They took two blocked players and a pair of surplus arms and turned it into an established starter in Latos. The Padres add depth to an already-strong farm system, and all three prospects involved are either ready (Alonso) or almost ready (Boxberger, Grandal) to contribute. If these three guys develop to their maximum potential, the Padres will get the better of this trade in the long run.
96 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd put Alonso and Grandal
as the definite #1 and #2 prospects in that system. Where do you think you’d slot them?
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 17, 2025 5:14 PM EST reply actions
#1 & 2...
In the Padres system? Ummm, no…
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 17, 2025 6:56 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions 1 recs
Ha
For me it is without any question at all. The Ummm, no response is certainly absurd.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 17, 2025 7:11 PM EST up reply actions
I'd
agree, not with it being absurd, but with the #1 and #2 statement.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 17, 2025 8:40 PM EST up reply actions
i'd probably go
Grandal, Erlin, Alonso as 1, 2, 3
by blue bulldog on Dec 17, 2025 9:03 PM EST up reply actions
You loooove Erlin.
I would put both Rizzo and Alonso ahead of him.
by nivarsity on Dec 19, 2025 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
I much prefer Rizzo
and, to a lesser extent Grandal, over Alonso. Alonso looks like Overbay to me—a decent player, but not someone who hits enough power that you want him as your regular at 1B, and his defense is way too bad for him to play elsewhere.
by PrincetonCubs on Dec 18, 2025 12:34 AM EST up reply actions
I think Overbay's 2006 season
Could be a reasonable typical season for Alonso, maybe a tad more power, and a tad less average.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 18, 2025 1:29 AM EST up reply actions
same here. I think Alonso bat is way overrated. He will hit for a good average, get on base but average-to-slightly above average power as a 1st baseman.
by Sniderlover on Dec 18, 2025 1:32 AM EST up reply actions
+1
I don’t see him being anything more than a 280/360/430 with 15 homers type.
James Loney-ish
by ScottAZ on Dec 19, 2025 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
that is probably his floor
those that use floor super literally, obviously he could forget how to hit tomorrow. but there is less than a 10% chance in my estimation that he will be any worse that that projection. of course, he has way more upside than that…though I don’t think he’ll be a 30HR hitter.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 19, 2025 1:48 PM EST up reply actions
Def not in Petco.
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
by CasanovaWong on Dec 21, 2025 10:26 AM EST up reply actions
I like this deal for the Padres
a great deal….shocked they got so much for Latos.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 17, 2025 5:15 PM EST reply actions
why?
Top pitching talent that is cost-controlled tend to net a high return. I mean, Garza netted Lee/Archer/Guyer/Chirinos and it’s easy to forget that the value of Lee/Archer last year was fairly high and arguably close to Grandal/Alonso’s value (albeit, for different reasons). The Padres package is better, but Latos this year had more value than Garza last year.
We could go through a history of trades of young talent, but in general, in the modern era, there is typically a gigantic premium placed on top young pitching talent. Not always, but often, and I think this trade reflects that. I’m just not sure that this is “so much” that it should be that shocking.
by toonsterwu on Dec 17, 2025 5:23 PM EST up reply actions
Should we expect an update to the Padres’ prospect list sometime after you finish off the other teams?
by polyrhythm07 on Dec 17, 2025 5:16 PM EST via mobile reply actions
he does that for every team who dealt (for) prospects I think
as well as some grade revisions
by CaptainCanuck on Dec 17, 2025 5:23 PM EST up reply actions
yes,
once every team is done, I will go back and revise all the lists to account for trades. This will be in early January
by John Sickels on Dec 17, 2025 6:11 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Liking the deal quite a bit
Alonso seems better suited for Petco than Rizzo, Grandal should be our catcher of the future, Box could be a closer. If Volquez rights the ship enough to become even a solid MOR starter then this trade will look great.
by walnut falcons on Dec 17, 2025 5:35 PM EST reply actions
don't underestimate
The impact of one of the top pitching coaches, Darrin Balsly, in righting the Edinson Volquez ship.
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 17, 2025 11:14 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
If Volquez bounces back
It will be primarily because he’s coming up on two years since the surgery.
by realitypolice on Dec 18, 2025 3:28 AM EST up reply actions
Two years since surgery, leaving a home run prone park for Petco, great SD pitching coach.
Volquez is a very good bounce back candidate next season, absolutely.
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 18, 2025 5:56 AM EST up reply actions
Both teams benefit
This is a good trade for the Reds because it nets them a top caliber starter and for the sacrifice the Padres get two prospects who should develop into very nice positional players, another who should be a quality back-end reliever and yet another player who has no. 2 starter talent if healthy.
Rockies’ Prospects
by Mjay424 on Dec 17, 2025 5:36 PM EST reply actions
"If these three guys develop to their maximum potential,
the (team that traded for them) will get the better of this trade in the long run."
Isn’t that pretty much a given in any trade involving prospects?
by None Taken on Dec 17, 2025 5:36 PM EST reply actions
well yes, but
the Padres got a pair of B+/A- prospect and a B- guy. That’s an unusually strong haul
by John Sickels on Dec 17, 2025 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
Like it for the Pads.....
…..but found it interesting that they were willing to trade Latos a year removed from his “breakout” season in 2010…..Didn’t look like the same guy last year, and I know he has a bit of a flake reputation……In the NL West you need a #1 starter to take on guys like Lincecum & Kershaw…..Pads fans, why did they let him go ?
by jkaflagg on Dec 17, 2025 5:43 PM EST reply actions
because
they need a lot of other things to take on guys like Lincecum & Kershaw as well
i like this deal for the Pads. don’t think Latos is that good that he’s irreplaceable for a team like SD
by blue bulldog on Dec 17, 2025 5:55 PM EST up reply actions
Because our offense was truly terrible and we've got loads of arms in the minors.
Latos is just a jock, and as such, can be a bit of a cocky jerk sometimes. But that’s no real big deal. He’s a stud. You want a guy like that to be cocky and supremely confident. He’s not a bad guy, he’s just hot shit and he knows it. That’ll rub some people the wrong way.
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 17, 2025 7:44 PM EST up reply actions
Agree....
…that you need the bats - hopefully Alonso will work out as well as A. Gonzalez did, as least as a hitter……It will be interesting to see which of young pitchers emerge; according to BA, Kelly might be a #2 and Erlin & Wieland profile a little lower….but when you factor in the home ballpark, they might end up performing better than projected.
by jkaflagg on Dec 17, 2025 8:20 PM EST up reply actions
Actually
Latos was better than ever over the 2nd half of the 2011 season after a somewhat shaky start to it. Over his final 16 outings, he tossed 14 quality starts with outstanding ratios.
Post All Star Break, Latos had 14 starts, throwing 94 IP (i.e over 6.5 IP per start), allowing 70 H, 7 HR, 24 BB while striking out 92. Of course, he went 4-4 over that stretch thanks to the inept SD offense. And this wasn´t a PETCO mirage either - as 4 of those starts (28.2 IP, 2.25 ERA, 2 HR allowed 29 K´s) came in games @ CIN, @ COL, @ PHI and @ ARI among others.
Except for the start of 2011 and the end of 2010, Latos has pitched like an ace for the past two years. Home & away. Night & day.
by Doob on Dec 18, 2025 3:24 AM EST up reply actions
Flake..
more like an asshole.
Everyone I know in and around the Padres Spring Complex and workout facility say he is huge dick and can’t stand him
by ScottAZ on Dec 19, 2025 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
whatever...
He’s heavily involved in local charities (without Padres involvement), he gets along w/ a lot of his teammates, he does meet & greets… I’ve heard rumors but from people I know that know him personally, he’s not a bad dude…
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 19, 2025 6:40 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Being friendly with Steve Adler isn’t exactly a glowing recommendation of someone’s personality.
by realitypolice on Dec 19, 2025 9:02 PM EST up reply actions
why must
This devolve into slandering?
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 19, 2025 11:34 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
If you’re going to reference “people who know him,” don’t you think you should disclose that it’s your publisher, not just some random guy who knows Latos? And that he’s been the biggest public honk for Latos for the last two years?
by realitypolice on Dec 20, 2025 8:35 AM EST up reply actions
LOL
Being involved in charities and PR (set up be agents) is the measure of character? In 2011 Michael Vick contributed more to charity than any other professional athele. OJ Simpson was renowned for his charity work before 1994.
An athlete that makes millions contributing time/money as a tax writeoff in PR setup by their agents or personal assistents in nothing to get excited about.
And I’ve heard from service people inside the Padres Complex in Peoria that he is an asshole. I tend to believe what the common working man tells me behnd the scenes than what is said when the camera is on
by ScottAZ on Dec 19, 2025 11:54 PM EST up reply actions
So if this means Rizzo is on his way out, what sort of player(s) would the Padres target?
RIP Greg Halman
by WhyGodWhy on Dec 17, 2025 6:33 PM EST reply actions
Rizzo +++
…for Manny Machado (wishful thinking, I know)…
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 17, 2025 6:58 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Not Machado...
But they might try to target Schoop…
by dbreer23 on Dec 17, 2025 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
I like this idea a TON.
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 17, 2025 7:59 PM EST up reply actions
Not
disagreeing, but why would the O’s wanna make that type of move right now?
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 17, 2025 8:41 PM EST up reply actions
We can offer value in prospects.
There’s a surplus at the position, why wouldn’t they make the move? We can build a package starting with Rizzo. I would think he’d be someone they’d look at. What are your thoughts?
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 17, 2025 9:01 PM EST up reply actions
I'm
just saying why would they give up a guy like Schoop for Rizzo.
Rizzo’s team control clock is already running, and the O’s aren’t close to competing (in my opinion). I’d rather keep Schoop who could come up with Machado and Bundy etc.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 17, 2025 9:44 PM EST up reply actions
Then again
its the O’s. So who knows what the hell they’ll do.
by NastyNate82 on Dec 18, 2025 1:10 AM EST up reply actions
Rizzo
+ Headley + Prospect for Machado
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 17, 2025 11:16 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
I don't see the O's doing that end of the deal
I guess it somewhat depends on who the other prospect is. Just my hunch. Machado’s star potential is enormous, and despite some struggles, he looks very good at his young age. Would getting a good corner IF prospect, and a 3rd baseman in his prime be worth it for an Orioles club that is at least 2 years away from any real shot at a hard push, if not more?
Now, I guess if Headley is being shipped to a 3rd team (and I think Headley would bring fairly good prospect value in return), perhaps, but I just don’t see the O’s moving a potential elite shortstop talent.
by toonsterwu on Dec 18, 2025 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
Texas?
The Rangers want a 1B. Hit them up. Maybe get Mitch Moreland and stick him in left?
by noelman31 on Dec 17, 2025 10:07 PM EST up reply actions
Mike Olt is name that might interest the Padres.
That would make Headley expendable, who we could trade for…..MOAR PROSPECTS!
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 18, 2025 6:05 AM EST up reply actions
I don't think Rizzo is automatically a big upgrade over Moreland
Moreland’s minor league numbers compare well with Rizzo’s, pretty close in a similar number of games, and Moreland is still cheap. Where is the incentive for TX? If they deal Moreland it won’t be for another 1B.
Some see a glass half empty, some a glass half full. I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be. - George Carlin
by t ball on Dec 18, 2025 6:45 AM EST up reply actions
Rizzo for Reynolds?
Get another bat onto the major league roster?
by Trashman on Dec 18, 2025 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
no thanks...
One of the Padres’ best hitting prospects (the best if you ask me), Gyorko, plays 3B - he is why Headley is expendable (they also have James Darnell who can play 3B).
Reynolds wouldn’t work here…
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 18, 2025 5:33 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
max value for a premium pitcher
Obviously Latos is significantly more valuable but this shows how to get max value for your talent, unlike the Sox did in dealing Santos. And for Reds fans who feel they gave up too much the Pads did not have to move Latos and he is under control for the next 4 years. He is ace quality its hard to say they paid too much.
by thebroman on Dec 17, 2025 6:55 PM EST reply actions
Well his ace perception has to be filtered through Petco
He will probably be a 4.00+ ERA pitcher in Cincinnati, and his HR allowed will rise, and the rest of his peripherals will probably take a hit.
by cookiedabookie on Dec 17, 2025 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
But
Say we have Latos and pitcher X and Latos is amount Y more valuable than pitcher X in Petco.
Hypothetically Latos will still be Y more valuable than pitcher X at GABP aa well.
It’s not a perfect hypothetical because of certain factors, but I think it works for the most part.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 18, 2025 12:22 AM EST up reply actions
if that were accurate...
…wouldn’t you expect fairly dramatic home/road splits (which he does not have)?
-peter
by PeterF on Dec 18, 2025 12:59 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
you should take a look at his career splits as his road stats are just as good as his home stats and he’s started 10 more career games on the road. He also gives up slightly fewer homeruns at road.
by Sniderlover on Dec 18, 2025 1:30 AM EST up reply actions
Well the BB-Ref converter has him putting up a 3.92 ERA as a Red in 2011
About a half a run of ERA. Even if his road and home stats are similar, the type of home park is going to impact his overall numbers, since the majority of his starts will occur there.
by cookiedabookie on Dec 18, 2025 3:04 AM EST up reply actions
okay but he’s shown the ability to be just as great on the road. hes not automatically going to turn into a 4 ERA pitcher going from petco to cinci ballpark.
He’s a great pitcher at home and on the road. Yes, Cinci ballpark will likely affect him a little bit but its not going to be as significant as you think
by Sniderlover on Dec 18, 2025 11:19 AM EST up reply actions
Friendly wager then
Let’s check back in a year :)
by cookiedabookie on Dec 18, 2025 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
wish the Royals could of got a package this good for Grienke.
obviously not the same positions but they got a way better deal.
by vic1124 on Dec 17, 2025 7:01 PM EST reply actions
Greinke only had two controlled years left (the most expensive two), Latos has 4 - so he was way more surplus value. Even though he’s a better pitcher, they shouldn’t have got as much for them in the first place (I say this without prejudice to whether the Royals got fair value in abosolute terms). Similar to Garza’s value vs. Latos.
by MjwW on Dec 17, 2025 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
Even though he’s a better pitcher
To be clear, that “he” refers to Greinke
by MjwW on Dec 17, 2025 7:54 PM EST up reply actions
The Reds gave up a lot
Yeah, Grandal/Alonso were going to be blocked. But when you’re talking about catchers, it is really good to have depth there.
Padres got a good deal, but now they need to figure out what to do with their first base prospects.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Dec 17, 2025 7:08 PM EST reply actions
I think
they wait for the Fielder market to play out. Once Fielder signs, they can then shop either Alonso or Rizzo around and see what they can get. Worst case scenario, they send Rizzo back to AAA for a bit more seasoning, which isn’t the worst thing, and contemplate moving one of them closer to mid-season.
While I’m not huge on Rizzo, if the Cubs miss on Fielder (and I’m not too enthused, as a Cubs fan, to want to give Fielder too many years), I think they’d definitely be in on someone like Rizzo.
by toonsterwu on Dec 17, 2025 10:41 PM EST up reply actions
good point on CHC & Rizzo
With ex-BoSox braintrust there and long-term 1B need, I can see that happening. Cashner & ? for Rizzo?
by qksilver on Dec 18, 2025 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
excited pads fan
Great deal forpadres. We need so much help and we got it. This trade gets us back to the top quicker. Latos is great but top starters have less value in petco. Now we get two needed young offensive studs and a power arm with real potential and volquez who could return to form and replace Latos. Plus if rizzo can’t play of he will be dealt for more. Reds traded from strength but props to the pads for realizing the big picture. Latos traded at his peak for undervalued talent. Cat wait to see the pads move up fast with players I am excited to see them get. Go padres
by Jeremy1Esq on Dec 17, 2025 7:14 PM EST via mobile reply actions
As much as I love Latos, Petco made Harang awesome so yeah, great news for padre fans
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Dec 17, 2025 8:05 PM EST up reply actions
Check out Latos home/road splits and get back to me on that one.
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 17, 2025 8:10 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure what you mean but I should have been clearer as well
Don’t necessarily agree with Jeremy that “top starters have less value in petco” or that Volquez might return to form, but I do feel that petco makes it easier to “replace” Latos and threw in homeboy harang as proof.
Regardless of how well Latos does I think padre fans are thrilled to get the promising hitting.
"I didn't really say everything I said."-Yogi ism
by chewbalka on Dec 18, 2025 12:26 AM EST up reply actions
Ah, I see.
Well, in that case, I agree.
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Dec 18, 2025 6:09 AM EST up reply actions
I wonder...
If in late July if Volquez will have decent numbers pitching at Petco and the Pads can swap him out for even more prospects…
by AGuinness on Dec 17, 2025 7:58 PM EST reply actions
Hmmm
I didn’t think about it in that fashion but the Friars definitely could put him on the market mid-season if he is having a good year to get more prospects which goes with their philosophy. Be interesting to see if that’s the case. Guess first he has to pitch well leading up to the trade deadline.
Redbird Dugout
http://www.redbirddugout.com
by JDizzidy on Dec 17, 2025 10:44 PM EST up reply actions
The best part of this trade for Cincy is
they got rid of a total head case in Volquez.
I think it’s pretty obvious Rizzo’s on his way out, there’s no way Alonso can play the OF, especially in Petco, and no way did the Padres picked him up so he could spend the season in Tucson.
Not a Grandal fan, a decent regular on a less than playoff quality team, certainly no one you’re going to build around.
The Reds are a better team now than when we woke up this morning, San Diego isn’t.
Whether they are in three years remains to be seen.
by Kelsdad on Dec 17, 2025 8:29 PM EST reply actions
so grandal can't be a decent regular
on a playoff team? you absolutely need a better catcher than him to win?
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 17, 2025 9:10 PM EST up reply actions
"you absolutely need a better catcher than him to win?"
Not at all.
He could be the everyday catcher for the Phillies because they have more than enough quality players to compensate for the lack of production.
The worse the team is, the better he would appear to be.
by Kelsdad on Dec 17, 2025 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
i feel extremely confident saying
no player benefits in the public eye or the expert eye from being on a worse offensive team, unless that player wouldn’t be good enough to play on a better team.
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 17, 2025 11:14 PM EST up reply actions
“you absolutely need a better catcher than him to win?”
The Molina crew is waving from the cheap seats.
by JoelGuzman'sScout on Dec 18, 2025 2:37 AM EST up reply actions
am I the only one excited about the union of Mat Latos and Dusty Baker?
by mrkupe on Dec 17, 2025 8:33 PM EST reply actions
The questionable decision from the Reds side of things seems to be the inclusion of Grandal.
I’m just not buying that Grandal is blocked positionally in Cincy until I see some evidence that Mesoraco can hit and catch capably at the big league level. If for some odd reason Mesoraco is hitting .200ish in August and not exactly impressing with his defense, there could be a lot of second guessing of Jocketty about that particular component of the deal.
by reillocity on Dec 17, 2025 11:07 PM EST reply actions
As a Reds' fan, I don't think it's really that questionable.
They’re not relying on Mesoraco and Dust to fill the catcher role. They have Ryan Hanigan, a 31-year-old who’s solid defensively and has a career 99 OPS+ (OBP heavy). His worst on-base percentage in his career is .356. I understand being a Grandal fan. I certainly was. His .300/.400/.500 line in the Minors this year showed a broad base of skills that lead you to belive he’ll be a contributor at the Big League level. But, you can’t let that get in the way of filling your biggest need with the Big club; not when the Reds already have an above-average catcher, and a top-10 prospect to develop behind him.
"Bitch slap your goldfish folks, we're all screwed."
-KevinMitchellisBatman
by BLee2525 on Dec 17, 2025 11:34 PM EST up reply actions
Ummmm
if Mesoraco isn’t playing 3/5 of the schedule, then Dusty Baker needs to be fired. That bat is legit and his Defense is ok.
by JoelGuzman'sScout on Dec 18, 2025 2:38 AM EST up reply actions
That's a lot for Latos
Interestingly, looking at career stats:
ERA ERA+
3.37 108 Matt Latos
3.83 109 Johnny Cueto
I guess that sort of gives an idea of the difference in the environments. And I’m not sure why people are bringing up Home/Road splits, as Latos was 0.46 runs worse on the road, which is about what one would expect.
Of course Cueto was awesome last year, but something like Cueto’s 2010 season might be a reasonable expectation, plus Latos should have the ability to throw a few more innings. And, Latos only just turned 24 in the past 2 weeks.
Still, I think that’s a pretty nice package. None of those guys look like sure fire stars, though.
by acerimusdux on Dec 18, 2025 3:43 AM EST reply actions
I think we've reached the point where prospects are officially overvalued
Yonder Alonso is 8 months older than Mat Latos. And he has a career .842 OPS in AAA. I think he’s going to be a nice player, but he’ll be a 25 year old below average defensive 1B. That’s not exactly a huge prospect.
Yasmani Grandal is only 11 months younger than Latos, and while he had a nice season, he’s far from a slam dunk. His A+ numbers were great….in the best hitting environment in baseball. His AA numbers were good, but not spectacular. Many scouts question his defensive skills behind the plate. Again, I think he’ll be a good player, but he’s not a slam dunk.
Brad Boxberger is going to be a good reliever. But he’s still a reliever.
This is no doubt a big haul for Latos, but people are pretending like Latos is a huge question mark while the other players are sure fire stars, but that is far from the reality.
It feels so nice to be back to normal
by nycredsfan on Dec 18, 2025 11:48 AM EST reply actions
he isn't below average defensively at 1B
by auclairkeithbc on Dec 18, 2025 12:07 PM EST up reply actions
He might be average, but I doubt it.
Decent hands, below average range/instincts
It feels so nice to be back to normal
by nycredsfan on Dec 18, 2025 2:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I don’t get a lot of these comments. Cincinnati is poised to win now; they have a competitive roster and one of the best players in baseball in Votto and should be managing the roster like they won’t have him forever. Alonso and Grandal are nice prospects, but neither of them is a sure-fire star, and both of them are redundant. In Latos, the Reds get four years of a front-of-the-rotation guy in both numbers and stuff, which coincides nicely with their likely window to compete. Sure, he’s not without health risks, but that’s the only thing I don’t like about this for the Reds. This was a fantastic deal for them; while their two division rivals faltered, they went out and got a young ace to anchor their rotation.
by limozeen on Dec 18, 2025 1:02 PM EST reply actions
I completely agree.
The Reds gave up some nice prospects, but they dealt them from positions of depth. I can’t find any faults with either team in regards to this trade.
The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.
by Stupendous Man on Dec 18, 2025 6:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Ditto
Yup, I’d say the boring truth is it’s a good deal for both sides; Alonso & Grandal look like 2-3.5 WAR guys to me, with maybe a couple better years at their peaks.
Latos is that good already, and young enough to still have a decent chance at real stardom.
Reds are still “only” an 85-87 win team, though…unless Jocketty has something else up his sleeve. (Which he probably does.)
by Mekonsrock on Dec 19, 2025 6:18 PM EST reply actions
I’ve read that Grandal won’t stick behind the plate, and if that’s the case, where’s he gonna play, 1st base? Alonso 1st base too? Rizzo?
I think the Reds did really well here in that they got an ace and still have a superior catching prospect and Joey Votto at 1st. The Padres will definitely need to make some more trades before we can accurately judge this trade, but I don’t think it’s a lopsided trade for the Padres like a lot of people are saying.
by Mrbasepaul on Dec 21, 2025 6:57 PM EST reply actions
Grandal has a pretty good shot of sticking behind the plate
He doesn’t have anywhere near the defensive questions of a Montero or a Lavarnway, even if he is a step behind Mesoraco and D’Arnaud defensively.
by cookiedabookie on Dec 22, 2025 10:58 AM EST up reply actions

by John Sickels on 













