Not a Rookie: Phil Hughes
Lots of people have been asking me about Phil Hughes, so here goes. First the brief career rundown.
Hughes was drafted in the first round in 2004, 23rd overall, out of high school in Santa Ana, California. He threw five shutout innings in a three-game trial in the Gulf Coast League. Scouts liked his projectability and his command of his low-90s fastball, along with a strong slider and changeup. I gave him a Grade B in the '05 book, worried about reports regarding a sore elbow.
Shoulder trouble limited him to 16 starts in 2005, but they went well, including a 1.97 ERA and a 72/16 K/BB in 69 innings in the Sally League, and a 21/4 K/BB in 18 innings in the Florida State League. He improved his curveball dramatically and began using it more than the slider, to reduce stress on his arm. I raised his grade to B+ in the '06 book, but was worried about injury risk.
Hughes threw 146 innings in 2006, split between five starts for Tampa and 21 for Double-A Trenton, where he went 10-3, 2.25 with a 138/32 K/BB in 116 innings. His velocity spiked into the 93-95 range, hitting 96 at times. The curveball also got better. Scouts were somewhat concerned about his erratic changeup, but overall it was hard to knock his performance. I gave him a straight Grade A, now considering that his injury risk was no higher than any other pitcher his age.
As you know, Hughes did have some durability troubles last year, Thankfully it was his hamstrings and a bum ankle that were the problems, not his elbow or shoulder. He held his own in major league action, very commendable given his age and the pressure of the New York environment, but his velocity was down at times, and again this year in the early going. In his major league career thus far, Hughes is 5-6, 5.14 with a 69/39 K/BB in 91 innings. He's been hit hard in April, and I don't like his 11/10 K/BB ratio in 2008.
So what is wrong with Hughes? I get panicked email from Yankees fans, asking if he was overhyped. No, he wasn't overhyped. Yes, there is a problem with Hughes right now. He's 21, practically skipped Triple-A, and is pitching for the New York Freaking Yankees. Cut the kid some slack. Indications are that his mechanics are a bit off right now , hampering his fastball command and probably the velocity too. As long as he remains healthy, I think there is a really good chance that Hughes will be just fine. Maybe he just needs some additional Triple-A time to regain his mechanical footing.
Ah, but there's the standard young pitcher caveat: as long as he remains healthy. I'm not worried about the mechanical problem in and of itself: that should be correctable. But what if the mechanical problem is a symptom of some underlying physical issue? That's known to happen, a pitcher altering his delivery on a subconcious level in response to a developing injury that he's not even aware of yet. Or what if there is no physical problem right now, but the mechanical tinkering triggers one as muscles are stressed in an unusual way? That's known to happen, too.
Yankees fans want a prediction. So here's one: Hughes will struggle on and off the next month or two, alternate strong outings with weak ones, with a slight improvement in his ratios but not enough to make statheads comfortable. Then in late July he goes on the DL with an injury of some kind, probably something vague like "shoulder weakness." He rests and rehabs, comes back in September and pitches like his normal self the rest of the way. He still may have to pay the Major Injury Piper sometime down the line, but not this year.. Whaddya think?
Tweet
13 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
re
I kept Hughes in my partial keeper league - hoping he’d be on par this year with the likes of Gallardo and Linececum, both of whom were also kept by other owners. That scenerio isn’t looking too hot right now. Things can change. I hope they do.
by spectfreak on Apr 25, 2025 5:52 PM EDT reply actions
Hughes was looking strong last night
NY fans just need to calm down. I am not sold on Kennedy at all though.
by number_twentyone on Apr 25, 2025 5:55 PM EDT reply actions
he's fine
he got squeezed a bit in kc start, had some bad luck, it’s been cold, etc. He looked great last night before they pulled him due to rain delay.
but he has been a bit rushed, and his AA numbers weren’t THAT dominant. Not like Doc in Fla St league at 18, or Hanson now, say. He got respect due to age and Yankees. He’d always have a pretty good team behind him in majors.
I am not worried about arm injuries. He looks a bit baby fattish, but his delivery is a simple, seaver-esque thick trunk hurl. He’ll be sub 4 era for last 4-5 months of season I wager, improving all year long.
Watching Pelfrey now. He walked a bunch in 1st, but got out of bases loaded 1 out only 1 run. He is throwing 95, sinking and rising fastball. He will eventually be very good. Stuff moves so much he has a hard time getting strikes. Jurrjens is pitching against him. Already a vet at 22.
I have all 3 in fantasy.
by wobatus on Apr 25, 2025 7:48 PM EDT reply actions
Mechanically
Don’t know when the picture on that card is taken but its very telling. Hughes clearly has some timing issues.
This pic is a great shot at the start of shoulder rotation (note his glove arm against the outside of his shirt sleeve). A pitching coach couldn’t ask for a more perfect snap shot.
First, his arm is short of vertical. This is causing excessive external rotation which is likely the cause of the previous shoulder issues. He is not extremely short of vertical (i.e. Kerry Wood) but its enough to give him the sensation of being late:
“Hughes said he knows he needs to slow down his delivery to keep from rushing forward and having his arm drag behind.”
I think this statement shows Hughes knows what it feels like but the fix is NOT to slow down but rather open the hips later.
Second, his shoulders are beginning to rotate but his hips haven’t finished rotating (note his back foot has not rotated completely yet.) I am not totally against the toe closed position he’s showing but when it hinders hip rotation I would look to correct. In this case, it may be a problem. There are usually two reasons for this lack of separation between hips and shoulders, one you are dealing with a younger player that doesn’t have the flexibility, strength and coordination to accomplish this complex action or two you have a player that is unwilling/unable to do so because of a loss of range of motion or injury (See Gil Meche - I don’t think Gil is more than 5 starts from a DL stint right now). Biomechnical research indicates a direct correlation between velocity and a greater separation (in terms of time) between maximum hip and torso rotational speed.
I’m optimistic that Hughes and the Yankees are aware there is an issue, but I’m not all that high on this being an easy fix from my experience. Nor am I all that high on the Yankees ability to develop young pitchers.
Baseball Instructor - www.frozenropes.com
by HuskerBob on Apr 25, 2025 10:53 PM EDT reply actions
Husker Bob
Nice call. He’s injured, and you essentially said that may be the issue.
by wobatus on May 2, 2025 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I think
I think you should have moved Tim Lincecum ahead of both Phil and Homer Bailey last winter just as I suggested you do. :)
By the way, it’s not over—but I don’t think anyone would argue that Tim is ahead of both the other two pitchers right now. They are also two years younger than Tim and have each pitched in the majors at an age when Tim hadn’t pitched beyond college.
I am happy that one of the reasons I backed Tim was because despite all the worry about his violent motion, I felt he would be the healthiest of the group. So far he has yet to experience even a sore arm, while both the other two have missed time to injury on at least two occasions I believe.
Tim hasn’t really pitched quite as well as his 1.23 ERA this season would indicate. This isn’t Bob Gibson in 1968, although it is beginning to somewhat resemble Steve Carlton in 1972. Tim won’t continue to strand 90% of his runners. Then again, batters won’t continue to hit .363 on Balls In Play against him, either.
If one wants three numbers to summarize how well Tim has pitched this season (aside from the 1.23 ERA, of course, since little in life is as simple as one, two, three), here they are:
. SLG against of … .299!
. 36 strikeouts
. 6 Grounded into double plays
By way of explanation, Tim has yielded 22 singles, 5 doubles, no triples and on home runs. The 36 strikeouts go pretty much without explanation, except that Tim now has four strikeout pitches—and in his worst game for off-speed pitches on last night, he still struck out nine batters in 6 1/3 innings. As for the double plays, Tim isn’t a highly-pronounced ground ball pitcher, but he IS that best combination of a high strikeout-high ground ball pitcher.
Control remains an issue, as Tim’s strikeouts per nine are actually up slightly from his 4.00 in 2007. However, his strike percentage is up from about 62% in 2007 to 65% this season.
Tim walked four as a reliever in his first appearance of the season, a game in which both he and Chad Billingsley didn’t enter the game until it became likely that the game would become official, which turned out to be the fourth inning for each. That Tim walked four in difficult conditions—including returning from a 74-minute rain delay.
He walked only one batter in each of next two starts, but walked three and five in his last two starts, as he lost his control late after having excellent control for the first four innings or so.
The Giants allowed Tim to throw 121 pitches last night, and he was still throwing primarily 95 to 97 mph in his final inning. He lost control of his off-speed pitches in particular late in the game, but still was able to achieve nine strikeouts and no runs in 6 1/3 innings primarily with his fastball.
I don’t think Tim can get by well for a full game on just his fastball, unless it is particularly live. But he has shown that with as little as a fastball and change up he can be very difficult to hit. When he has four pitches at his disposal and under command, he is darn hard to hit.
Tim’s off-speed stuff is very hard to square up. He has now thrown nearly 1000 off-speed pitches in his 29 major league appearances, and he has yielded only two or three home runs on those pitches.
He yielded a home run on the first curve ball he threw in the majors—and a round tripper to Todd Helton on a high, inside change up a few games later. I believe he yielded one other homer on the curve ball last season, although I can’t specifically remember it.
But yielding only two or even three home runs on nearly 1000 pitches is pretty phenomenal. And I would say Tim’s fastball is even better this season, which is one of the reasons his strikeout rate is up. As I mentioned before, Tim has yet to yield a triple or home run in five appearances this season.
by sharksrog on Apr 26, 2025 1:41 AM EDT reply actions
Hughes
Sharks, I really don’t mean to spout any invective, but keep Lincecum to Lincecum. At very minimum, at least say something about Hughes (rather than just describing the nascence of an ace in SF as opposed to the struggles of a young hurler in NYC.)
Regarding Hughes, I think this is just a case of a young pitcher adjusting to the majors. It takes time and as long as Cashman remains in power, which is no guarantee past this season, I think Hughes will be given every chance to develop. Last fall, Hughes showed that even without his best stuff, he has the capacity to be a front end of the rotation guy. The debate seems to be about whether or not he’ll end up a an ace, or “merely” a no.1, or a no.2.
This year, I can see Hughes doing something like John outlined in this NAR with the final tally looking a great deal like the crystal ball.
I draw a distinction between aces and no. 1 starters. It’s enigmatic, but there’s a definite difference for me between a Wang and a Santana, and it goes far beyond mere K/9. It’s a level of dominance, reliabilty, and I suppose a result of those two things and several others that make somebody an ace. I don’t know that I’ll ever see Phil Hughes become an ace, but as a resident of the tri-state area, it’s always good to have another one around to watch. As long as he never faces the Mets. :)
by GuyinNY on Apr 26, 2025 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Asterisk
Not in the Barry Bonds sense, but there should be one after the sentence referring to what sort of starter Hughes will be and before the final paragraph. I really wish we could edit. :(
P.S. John’s crystal ball would make Hughes a decent 3/4 starter this season, very impressive for someone his age.
by GuyinNY on Apr 26, 2025 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Um
Are you talking about Phil Hughes? Do you mind?
This is obviously the Not A Rookie: Tim Lincecum Thread #237.4.
Oh . . .wait. No it isn’t. Hmm.
by mrkupe on Apr 26, 2025 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Move Joba into the rotation
Hank is right.
Trade for a set-up man to replace him.
Hughes would benefit as would Kennedy. Or maybe even try Kennedy in the relief role first. He can’t possibly pitch any worse. Or can he?
by batonball on Apr 27, 2025 1:15 PM EDT reply actions
Maybe
Maybe Joba Chamberlain will burn up the Yankee rotation if placed therein. But I heard today from someone who knows him that his best bet is as a short reliever.
by sharksrog on Apr 29, 2025 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry guys
Sorry guys. But when the names of either Phil Hughes or Homer Bailey come up, I immediately wish I could have convinced John to put Tim ahead of them a winter ago. As I mentioned, it is possible they will still surpass Tim - since each is two years younger - but even though both have far more professional experience than Tim, neither has yet pitched as well. And while one of the reasons John downgraded Tim from an A to an A- was his worry about the effect of Tim’s heavy college innings on his arm, Tim has never had so much as a sore arm, while I believe Phil and Homer have EACH missed time TWICE due to injury.
By the way, I liked Husker Bob’s point about the picture of Phil indicating timing problems. That picture doesn’t make Phil look good at all. I still need to get in touch with Husker, since I think he can provide some insight into some present and/or potential problems regarding Lincecum’s mechanics.
But as of right now, I would say that the past year has developed rather positive evidence for Lincecum, while it has raised some questions about Hughes and Bailey.
I like all three pitchers. But I like Tim better than either of the other two. He has more stuff and seemingly healthier mechanics. Despite a slow start control-wise this season, Hughes has the best control of the three, and both Hughes and Bailey have the age advantage.
By the way, I got to see a baseball card of Tim’s from the summer of 1988, back when he was 14. It showed him at 4-foot-10 and 78 pounds. By the time he was a freshman the following year, he had surged to 4-foot-11 and 85. :)
by sharksrog on Apr 27, 2025 8:57 PM EDT reply actions
Phil Hughes
Since people are asking for an opinion directly on topic, I will make one.
I would like to say that I know relatively little about Phil and posted about Tim Lincecum not only because he interests me far more, but because I know a LOT more about Tim than Phil. My comments on Phil should probably be taken with a grain of salt. But here they are.
I loved Phil because at a very young age he showed the best combination of dominance and control of any prospect I can remember. Because of this, I liked him better than the same-aged Homer Bailey.
But as Husker Bob pointed out, the still picture John placed at the top of this thread doesn’t make Phil’s mechanics look very good. And while a still picture can indeed give a FALSE picture, the picture seems to me to be disturbing, particularly given Phil’s large size, which might make him more prone to serious mechanical flaws.
And although he’s only, what, four years out of high school?, Phil has already lost time to injury in two different seasons.
Phil is still a prospect I would LOVE to have—but I think he star has dimmed, perhaps only temporarily. That Phil is pitching in the majors at a very young age is impressive. That he has already thrown a partial-game no-hitter is EXTREMELY impressive. But the issues that first were visible in injury and mechanics are now affecting his effectiveness.
I have dropped Phil back almost to the Homer level. That’s still pretty elite company. But while I’m not sure Phil’s high ceiling has dropped, I fear his chances of reaching it may have.
Homer Bailey.
by sharksrog on Apr 28, 2025 3:23 PM EDT reply actions

by John Sickels on 













