San Francisco Giants Top 20 Prospects for 2012
San Francisco Giants Top 20 Prospects for 2012
The list and grades are a blending of present performance and long-term potential. Comments are welcome, but in the end all analysis and responsibility is mine of course. Full reports on all of players can be found in the 2012 Baseball Prospect Book. We are now taking pre-orders. Order early and order often!
QUICK PRIMER ON GRADE MEANINGS:
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment in the book for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
1) Gary Brown, OF, Grade B+: Future center fielder. Outstanding speed, doubles power with occasional home runs, not a big walk guy but makes contact and should continue to hit for a high average. Combined with strong defense, you have an impressive package of tools and skills.
2) Joe Panik, SS-2B, Grade B: I was very impressed with him in the Arizona Fall League. Line drive bat with gap power, good plate discipline, uses speed well on the bases, plays with fire. I think he can be an average defensive shortstop or above-average at second base. Nice tablesetter when combined with Brown at the top of the future Giants order.
3) Tommy Joseph, C, Grade B-: Borderline B: I like the way he improved his defense, also has standout power, hit 22 homers in High-A at age 19/20. Strike zone judgment remains poor and precludes higher grade, but he projects as a regular catcher if he can improve his approach.
4) Andrew Susac, C, Grade B-: Hasn't played yet, but based on what we saw in college, should be a steady defensive catcher with an above-average arm, producing power. We'll have to see if his pure hitting skills hold up.
5) Heath Hembree, RHP, Grade B-: Love the fastball, but slider, changeup ,and command are all works in progress. Potential to be a closer.
6) Francisco Peguero, OF, Grade B-: Never draws a walk, makes his living with speed, contact, gap power, and extreme BABIP. Might show more power in time. Good glove. Problem is that he has to hit .300 to be productive with his current approach, and if he's just hitting .280 he will hurt you more than he helps.
7) Eric Surkamp, LHP, Grade B-: Doesn't throw hard but has the statistical components of a power pitcher, excellent K/IPs and few hits, in the minors anyway. Was more tentative in the majors once the scouting reports got around and was hit hard. I think he can adjust and become a solid number four starter.
8) Kyle Crick, RHP, Grade C+: Borderline B-: High-ceiling arm, potential for four major league pitches with a workhorse body, still refining command. Could be the top prospect in the system in two years but isn't there yet.
9) Josh Osich, LHP, Grade C+: Borderline B-: Power southpaw, needs to prove his arm is healthy before ranking higher. Does he start or relieve?
10) Hector Sanchez, C, Grade C+: Held his own after unexpected major league promotion at age 21. Very good defense, switch-hitter with a chance to surprise people with the bat once he settles in. At worst he'll have a long career as a backup.
11) Clayton Blackburn, RHP, Grade C+: Major sleeper prospect from 2011 draft, showed excellent command in Arizona Rookie League (30/3 K/BB in 33 innings, just 16 hits), above-average velocity. Overshadowed in Oklahoma high school ranks by Archie Bradley and Dylan Bundy, but he's got a lot of talent himself.
12) Ehire Adrianza, SS, Grade C+: Strong defensive shortstop from Venezuela. Hit .300 in the California League but scouts continue to question his hitting. At age 22 he has time to improve. Utility guy at worst.
13) Mike Kickham, LHP, Grade C+: Easy to overlook due to 4.11 ERA in Low-A, but his FIP was much better and he has good stuff for a lefty, low 90s with good slider and workable changeup. Small adjustments and better luck could take him a long way in 2012.
14) Seth Rosin, RHP, Grade C+: University of Minnesota product looked great in the Arizona Fall League following decent campaign as Low-A swingman. Big breakout is possible in 2012.
15) Jarrett Parker, OF, Grade C+: Good athlete, shows power, speed, draws walks, fine glove. Main problem is strikeouts: he struggles with contact and batting average/OBP will suffer at higher levels without adjustments in his approach. Fourth outfielder profile right now.
16) Ricky Oropesa, 1B, Grade C+: Southern Cal first baseman saw power drop with switch to less-potent metal bats in college, but he has summer ball track record of good hitting with wood. Should hit for power but we'll have to see about batting average/OBP.
17) Joan "Not a Typo" Gregorio, RHP, Grade C: Ultra-projectable, posted 2.32 ERA in rookie ball although peripherals were less impressive. Potential to rank much higher next year once he gets more innings in. Tall and lean at 6-7, 180.
18) Jesus Galindo ,OF, Grade C: Switch-hitter stole 47 bases in Northwest League. Lacks power, needs to improve on-base skills to stick as a leadoff hitter.
19) Chris Marlowe, RHP, Grade C: Oklahoma State right-hander has above-average fastball, nasty curve, and incredible K/IP ratios in college. Could move quickly in relief if his command is sufficient.
20) Conor Gillaspie, 3B, Grade C: Forgotten man, but I think he can still surprise us. Gradually showing more power, makes contact, draws some walks, and has improved his defense. Doesn't have the power ceiling of Chris Dominguez (also a Grade C prospect) but is a steadier hitter with a higher floor.
OTHERS: Bryce Bandilla, LHP; Ray Black, RHP; Brett Bochy, RHP; Alex Burg, C-UT; Ryan Cavan, 2B; Hector Correa, RHP; Charlie Culberson, 2B; Chris Dominguez, 3B; Jake Dunning, RHP; Jake Dunnington, RHP; Adam Duvall, 3B; Kendry Flores, RHP; Leonardo Fuentes, OF; Stephen Harrold, RHP; Chris Heston, RHP; Chuckie Jones, OF; Roger Kieschnick, OF; Derek Law, RHP; Adalberto Mejia, LHP; Dan Otero, RHP; Shawn Payne, OF; Brett Pill, 1B; Angel Villalona, 1B.
The Giants system has thinned out but still has intriguing possibilities. The combination of Gary Brown and Joe Panik at the top of a batting order would look very nice. Tommy Joseph, Andrew Susac, and Hector Sanchez provide catching depth that would be the envy of most organizations. I really like Joseph's upside, but his plate discipline issues concern me. Susac was one of my personal favorites from the 2011 draft.
It is fun to watch Peguero play and his tools stand out, but can he really hit .300 in the majors with such an impatient approach? Parker, Galindo, and Chuckie Jones all have significant tools but they come with big questions too.
The Giants have a reputation for pitching development. While there are no sure-fire aces right now, there is a lot of raw material. Surkamp still has a good shot at being a number four starter and anyone giving up on him after a few rough starts in the majors is overreacting. Crick and Blackburn from the 2011 draft have plenty of upside but will need time. Hembree will get to the majors sometime in 2012 and projects as an overpowering closer if he can sharpen his command a bit more. College products Kickham and Rosin from the 2010 draft look like they can take a big step forward in 2012.
176 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why is Buechele off the board
Sorry I missed the discussion.
by ttnorm on Jan 2, 2026 10:14 AM EST reply actions
Question for John
I was wondering how you even start to do a right up and grade for someone like Angel Villalona. We all know what he used to be, but the murder and lack of playing time must make giving an accurate grade nearly impossible. What do you do in cases such as his?
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 11:05 AM EST reply actions
I write a summary of what happened, and give him a Grade C. Nothing else I can do really.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
That is what I figured
He is truly one of the hardest guys to grade.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
Angel
Supposedly he looks good in workouts, but he’ll have rust to work off, and it wasn’t like he was a very polished hitter to begin with
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
And
now he’s 21, not 18. Kinda sad really.
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jan 2, 2026 3:19 PM EST up reply actions
Is what it is. He’ll either rise like Lazarus or fade away. He’s behind the 8-ball but its worth pointing out he made the effort to force the Giants to take him back. Whether he can get his visa straightened out with the DR is another question. He yo-yo’d his weight extremely, maybe the prison changed his outlook. Can’t predict that one.
Giants have very few big bats. Pill is not really a prospect any more. Eldred is org filler, Duvall feasted on poor pitching and will have to prove out at SJ (Giants fans are way over the top on his sleeper status in my opinion), Joseph is looking good, and Big Chris D has contact issues and struggled a bit in the mid season AA call up. You can add in Ricky O and Susac to the mix, but that’s about it on big bats. Nice to have AnVil as a wild card.
by shankbone on Jan 3, 2026 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
Zack Wheeler
Where would he have been, if he hadn’t been traded?
by sxelonghorn10 on Jan 2, 2026 11:33 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Most opinions I’ve seen suggest a it would have been a toss up between he and Brown.
by BestHyperboleEver on Jan 2, 2026 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry...
Wheeler is definitely the better prospect. Wheeler has Ace potential after the year he posted in Giants and Mets system. Furthermore, pitching prospects are definitely more prized than position prospects, so count the higher ceiling with the value of him being a starting pitcher and it’s Wheeler by a lot (though I think Brown is a very, very good prospect).
What can I say...I like Colombia and I like Carlos Willoughby...It's win-win.
by objesguy on Jan 16, 2026 8:42 PM EST up reply actions
John,
it’s off topic, but could you try to make a list of prospects using just scouting. People like Tom Tango think it would be a great idea. we could then combine this with MLEs. I wouldn’t want you to change your normal lists, but maybe you could just try to do a list using just scouting.
by Bososx13 on Jan 2, 2026 12:02 PM EST reply actions
John's a family man and his scouting trips are infrequent
Plus, that’s what scouts are for.
by Flynn Blake on Jan 2, 2026 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
yeah
I wish I had more time to scout than I do. Having a special needs child makes it difficult to travel for a variety of reasons. Hopefully in the next year or two it will get easier.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 12:19 PM EST up reply actions
I meant
you could use info scouts gave you too, just don’t use stats. Sorry to hear that you have a special needs child, didn’t know that, I’ll pray for him.
by Bososx13 on Jan 2, 2026 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
"John, it’s off topic, but could you try to make a list of prospects using just scouting."
As someone who does this kind of thing for a living, I would assume that’s all he uses, wouldn’t you?
Classifying someone as a top prospect because he hit .356 in the Florida State League doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny.
Right?
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
actually he does use stats
if you asked him, I would be sure he’d say yes.
by Bososx13 on Jan 2, 2026 1:00 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sure he does, but speaking from experience they're not that important, especially at the lower levels.
There’s so much that goes into evaluations that stats really don’t play a part, unless you’re comparing a FSL guy to a CAL guy, for example, almost like they’re a tie-breaker.
“Scouts scout tools, not stats.”
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 1:50 PM EST up reply actions
well yea
I use everything. My whole approach is to blend scouting and stats.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 1:53 PM EST up reply actions
funny
What’s really funny: if I poke around the internet, I can find people who say “Sickels sucks because all he uses is stats and doesn’t use enough scouting” and “Sickels sucks because he doesn’t pay enough attention to stats and pays too much attention to scouting”.
This is the risk of the middle position. No one is happy. :)
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 1:56 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, John, I hear ya.
I bumped into Jonathan Mayo the week before the AFL Stars game and he said he was excited to see Bryce Harper for the first time.
I about fainted on the spot.
The “MiLB Prospect Expert” had never seen the best prospect play in person before?
I couldn’t believe it.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
It happens, and not just to the writers.
One thing that I have discovered talking with baseball people over the years: even GMs or farm directors will say “whose that guy?” sometimes if you ask them for their opinion about someone in another organization, sometimes even a guy who is a hot prospect.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
"even GMs or farm directors."
Yeah, but that, IMO, is more of a reflection of the sabermetric movement, front office types were relying more on stats than on what makes a player.
I’ve noticed a change over the past couple of years, back to the way thing used (and should) be.
I saw a half dozen GM’s at the Rising Stars game, which is more than I’d ever seen before, and that’s not even counting the one’s I didn’t see.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
That has nothing to do with the sabermetric movement.
GMs and farm directors not having a complete view of prospects from other teams has nothing to do with the sabermetric movement. That is something that is as old as baseball itself.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
GMs and farm directors not having a complete view of prospects from other teams has nothing to do with the sabermetric movement.
I disagree.
If a team relies more heavily on the numbers than another, that GM won’t travel out as much, and thus won’t see the amount of players.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 3:22 PM EST up reply actions
um, no
That’s just not true. In my experience the opposite is true..the more statheady types have more familiarity with other organizations than the traditionalists.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 3:31 PM EST up reply actions
"the more statheady types have more familiarity with other organizations than the traditionalists."
Maybe, but there’s a difference between names on a spreadsheet and knowing whether he has a good pick-off move or not.
That’s what I meant by “knowing”, and I would think you’d agree there is a difference between the two.
The gap is much narrower from a GM who travels than one who doesn’t.
Sample size of course, lol.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
All GMs travel and would prefer to get a personal look at every important minor league player. But that’s just not possible…even for someone like a GM who lives and breathes baseball 70 hours a day.
I guess my point is that I wouldn’t be hard on Mayo for not having seen Harper before the AFL. Unless he has a huge travel budget, he can’t see everyone, and I don’t know of any writer who has a huge travel budget.
It is ALWAYS better to see the guy in person. I knew Brett Lawrie was going to be able to handle 3B just fine even when the scouting reports were still negative, because I saw it with my own eyes.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
"I guess my point is that I wouldn’t be hard on Mayo for not having seen Harper before the AFL"
That’s his job.
Mayo gets paid to provide as much information on these players as possible, which means seeing them, talking to GM’s and PD’s and scouts and managers, etc.
Mayo doesn’t write for you and me, he writes for the fisherman in Alaska or the taxi driver in Honolulu who can’t see these players.
How can he write objectively about a player without seeing him?
In the same vein, I would expect every GM to know who Harper is.
But the GM who knows how good an opposing Class A 2B is on his pivot has a distinct advantage over the GM who only knows him from a stat sheet put together by an intern.
“I knew Brett Lawrie was going to be able to handle 3B just fine even when the scouting reports were still negative, because I saw it with my own eyes.”
Exactly my point.
Keith Law is the biggest a-hole in the business, but I respect his opinion because he travels and sees players.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
his job is to see every prospect, so
not having seen Harper play is no more of an issue as not having seen Jarek Cunningham play. In fact, its less of an issue because everyone knows Harper is supposed to be good and there’s a ton of scouting reports on Harper.
Prospecting IMO is about finding the next big thing, not writing further about the current big thing that everyone already knows about; although writing further about them is important too.
by Looney4baseball on Jan 2, 2026 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
Mayo
had almost surely seen video of Harper at that point, so the fact that he was seeing Harper in person for the first time isn’t all that egregious imo. Mayo is also a reporter, not a scout, and I’m not sure how crucial in-person looks are to what he does.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 4:28 PM EST up reply actions
" Mayo is also a reporter, not a scout, and I’m not sure how crucial in-person looks are to what he does"
Would you hire a lawyer to fix the leak in your sink?
It’s everything.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
His job is to cover the industry
and tell the stories behind it, talk to various people, etc. His firsthand observations pale in comparison to what experts are saying about the kid. You won’t often find a reporter’s personal perspective splashed across an article. A column, yes, but Mayo is a reporter.
It sounds like there’s some confusion about what Mayo’s role is supposed to be.
by Flynn Blake on Jan 2, 2026 4:53 PM EST up reply actions
"It sounds like there’s some confusion about what Mayo’s role is supposed to be."
For some, obviously. lol
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 6:02 PM EST up reply actions
They have this thing now called "video"
It does wonders in evaluating a player.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 5:23 PM EST up reply actions
ok, so in following this (rather sanctimonious) point
wouldn’t it be better for Mayo to travel to see some lesser-known prospects to broaden his knowledge base, than to spend his time and travel budget on a player that has been covered from every possible angle in excruciating detail? Wouldn’t it behoove him to see the top prospect when he has the chance to see many, many more?
Furthermore, KLaw has an advantage in that he lives in Arizona and can see the AFL in his backyard every year. A strategic move on his part, sure, but not everyone has that option. Perhaps he saw Harper before when Harper was in HS or JC, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the AFL was also his first live look at Harper…
by msgg139 on Jan 3, 2026 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
Most of you missed the point on Mayo, which is OK...
…it’s personal choice where we get our information from anyway.
Law’s move to AZ had nothing to do with baseball.
by Kelsdad on Jan 3, 2026 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
'(Keith) Law’s move to AZ had nothing to do with baseball.'
Do we have to become ESPN Insiders to hear more?
by Matt0330 on Jan 3, 2026 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Hi, Charles.
As usual, you would be wrong.
Thanks for stopping by, though.
by Kelsdad on Jan 3, 2026 7:27 PM EST up reply actions
Ha, thanks anyways
I didn’t really care either way. I just thought the short, vague & not especially informative, Law-esque snippet lent itself to that joke.
by Matt0330 on Jan 4, 2026 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
I figured you were sleeping at night not knowing
Seemed to remember him saying something to that effect in a chat (irony: not paywall?) though.
by charles wallace on Jan 4, 2026 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
"I knew Brett Lawrie was going to be able to handle 3B just fine even when the scouting reports were still negative, because I saw it with my own eyes."
Which is interesting, and raises some questions itself, like why the scouting reports didn’t jibe with your look? When you say scouting reports, do you mean the general industry buzz or your sources, and if the latter, how does that factor in to your confidence in that source?
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
Scouting reports generally lag behind.
Just how it works until everyone catches on to what’s new.
by polodude017 on Jan 2, 2026 4:09 PM EST up reply actions
I understand that,
which is why I’m interested in what John means by “scouting reports”.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 4:11 PM EST up reply actions
buzz in lawrie's case. it all depends on what player you're talking about
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
Right,
so in this case it was akin to the Ackley situation, where scouting reports on the defense were probably out-dated as polodude says.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 4:30 PM EST up reply actions
"Right, so in this case it was akin to the Ackley situation, where scouting reports on the defense were probably out-dated as polodude says."
Not really, because as John said, it depends on the player.
Lawrie was a second baseman who had displayed enough questionable skills to remain at the position at a higher level.
Some scouts were of the opinion those lacking skills would also affect him at third base, which, after playing the position for a year, turned out to be not true.
Ackley was moved to second base because of an injury, after his TJ in college he played first base for a year then the Mariners tried to make an outfielder out of him, but his arm isn’t very good, so 2B was next on the list.
Projection is a big part of scouting, sometimes guys get it right, sometimes they don’t.
Seeing a guy for yourself just gives you that final justification on what you already know.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 4:52 PM EST up reply actions
I thought the Mariners backup plan was to make him an OF?
And 2B was their first choice. I could be wrong though.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 5:24 PM EST up reply actions
No, you're right.
Ackley was a CF in college, then a 1B after his elbow injury. The M’s drafted him with the intention of trying him at 2B because it increased his value, and they believed he could manage the switch. Seems to have worked out.
by goyo70 on Jan 2, 2026 9:52 PM EST up reply actions
Kelsdad,
in case you didn’t see it in the Yankees thread, I’ll ask you to not respond to my posts (I’ll do the same with yours). Your answer above — the Mariners made no secret that they intended to play Ackley at 2B when they drafted him — is an example of why I’m making the request.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 6:10 PM EST up reply actions
"I’ll ask you to not respond to my posts.."
Excuse me?
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
I think
it’s pretty clear. I’d appreciate if you did not respond to my posts (e.g. offer your opinion, whether in agreement or contradiction, attempt to engage me) and I’ll return the favor. Thanks.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 6:20 PM EST up reply actions
Good luck in your search for a new site, charles.
You do realize I’ll be responding to every comment, now, right?
LOL
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 6:23 PM EST up reply actions
That's your prerogative, of course
I can only ask that you do the right thing.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 6:42 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry, Charlie
The request in itself was probably the most ignorant comment I’ve ever seen on the internet, but to do so without cause or reason is way beyond sound reasoning, not to mention class and etiquette.
You got some big balls.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
It's the internet, dude.
Take a pill.
What could be better than Dan Johnson
hitting .108
Let's trade Reddick for Heyward!
Herreshoff.info -- The most awesome website since the invention of the internet.
by QW on Sep 28, 2025 9:47 PM CDT
by SandalsNoPants on Jan 2, 2026 10:42 PM EST up reply actions
My friend,
who teaches grade school science, showed me a trick this weekend. Fill up a 20-oz plastic pop bottle with water and replace the cap. Take a push pin and poke holes in the center of each of the five nubs on the bottom. Place it in a public place with a sign that says “Do Not Squeeze” or “Do Not Remove Cap” and keep a towel handy. lol
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 10:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
lol
Happy Holliday's everybody. Be safe and, enjoy! - Case
by casejud on Jan 3, 2026 1:47 AM EST up reply actions
probably the most ignorant comment I’ve ever seen on the internet
Kels, Just a guess here, you are kind of new to the internet. The alternative is that you are a pathetic anonymous internet stalker and I will petition John to get you banned here.
by ttnorm on Jan 3, 2026 7:50 AM EST up reply actions 10 recs
....and green
Pretty rare to see something go green on this site.
by siddfynch on Jan 3, 2026 11:08 PM EST up reply actions
Like John said, the bickering is helping his page views, so anything I can do to help.
Although I can’t take any credit, I don’t often disagree with intelligent comments.
Happy New Year!!
by Kelsdad on Jan 4, 2026 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
Personal looks are great but
No single person has the ability to see everybody and it should be plainly obvious that seeing a guy once or twice does not always give a complete picture. The top guys need to rely on their local guys and cross checkers before they get personally involved.
by ttnorm on Jan 2, 2026 6:18 PM EST up reply actions
I would think that they don't have enough time to know about all the players
A MLB GM must have an insanely busy schedule.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 5:22 PM EST up reply actions
Not to mention
that player evaluation is only one part of their job, and generally not the primary one for most. I’ve seen more than one GM reflect in interviews on the fact that the vast majority of their duties are opaque to fans (and even the media), and how bemused they are at the things they get hammered on.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 6:07 PM EST up reply actions
Schuerholz had some interesting takes in his book
He said something along the lines of his biggest job regarding prospects wasn’t analyzing and evaluating who the best prospects were, but rather analyzing and evaluating who the best scouts were and then hiring/retaining them, giving them more responsibilities, and placing greater emphasis on their evaluations and opinions
by nixa37 on Jan 2, 2026 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
why?
Bryce Harper’s the least interesting prospect in baseball to go take a look at from a scouting perspective
you don’t need to see him to know that he’s going to be among the top three prospects in baseball. seeing him is a waste of your most valuable resource as a scout (time). it’s much more important as a scout to go find the prospects that no-one knows about yet.
by blue bulldog on Jan 2, 2026 3:08 PM EST up reply actions
Not to mention the fact that they'd be scouting a player they have almost a 0% chance of acquiring.
by polodude017 on Jan 2, 2026 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
That is true, John and I are talking about guys who are already professionals.
You are right.
The Yankees aren’t going to send a scout to follow Harper around while he’s in school because they have no chance of getting him, so it’s a waste of man-hours and payroll.
by Kelsdad on Jan 2, 2026 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
My thoughts exactly
I don’t think it that odd that Mayo hadn’t used the resources to go see a prospect that everyone knows nearly everything about already. Might be good to better know the guys with less hype.
by pack_fan on Jan 2, 2026 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
+1
"When you find your way. Then you see it disappear."
by padmadfan on Jan 3, 2026 2:42 AM EST up reply actions
John - I like that you re-evaluate your picks every so often, and enjoy reading your analysis on all teams, not just mine. Not that many people spend a lot of time looking at or admitting mistakes or misjudgements.
And speaking of my favorite team, fans tend to hold Brian Sabean’s mistakes against him heavily versus his successes. Nobody is perfect, and Sabean has his flaws, but he is building a very nice core group of players. I haven’t seen the G’s farm system this full of promising players - and hitters to boot! - for a long time, if ever.
by shankbone on Jan 2, 2026 2:37 PM EST up reply actions
Sabean
It seems to me, as someone who isn’t a Giants fan and has no axe to grind either way, that Sabean gets nitpicked quite a bit.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
Just like to say also I appreciate the hard but fair grades on the Gints system. Guys who are far away at the moment, and not many headline grabbers. Still, Brown and Panik can be very solid regulars, and it would appear there are a fair number of guys with good chances to make the majors, which is different from the late 90s/early 2000s. Its not a flashy star driven system for sure.
by shankbone on Jan 2, 2026 3:19 PM EST up reply actions
I've been one to rag on Sabean in the past
primarily for his free-agent signings like Marvin Benard, Edgardo Alfonzo, Barry Zito and on and on. And I think there have been a lot of bad ones. I also think, in retrospect, that many of them have been dictated by ownership, especially in Zito’s case, and I’m willing to cut him a lot more slack than previously.
by Flynn Blake on Jan 2, 2026 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
Bernard was a system player, not a FA, though I agree with your point in general.
by Roger on Jan 2, 2026 9:30 PM EST up reply actions
Correct, but they had a choice on re-signing/extending him
or cutting him loose, and totally blew that decision.
by Flynn Blake on Jan 4, 2026 4:16 AM EST up reply actions
Yep
I have been defending him for years. He isn’t perfect but his teams win.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
5 playoffs in 15 seasons...
from a guy who inherited the greatest hitter of his generation (like Barry or hate him, the competitive advantage of his mammoth numbers) and a top flight payroll in a weak division isn’t that great a resume.
And judging a guy by his team’s results, while obviously tempting, is really misleading. You judge a GM by his moves. Sabean’s successes have come largely on the backs of his scouting department (and catching lightning in a bottle in 2010 with the out of nowhere performances of Aubrey Huff and Andres Torres - I’d be willing to give him credit if that happened more often, but most of his proven veteran additions are middling at best). I guess he deserves some credit for putting those guys in place and not dealing the players away, but this is still the guy who broke the bank for Barry Zito, guaranteed Aaron Rowand $60 million to play through his age-34 season, made an ill-advised 8-figure per year gamble on Aubrey Huff repeating his flukey 2010 performance, and reportedly offered up Tim Lincecum in trade for Alex Rios (and was thankfully rebuffed).
Sabean’s success is, like most GM’s, part shrewd moves, part luck. The proportion is debateable. You can say “hey, he won,” and give him a lot of credit for 2010. Or you can say that he lucked into two crazy flukey performances from veterans that nobody could have seen coming the same year he graduated a great core of young players, and give him very little credit for same. I prefer to look at his moves as a whole. There are some good ones to be sure, but there are a lot of very, very troubling ones, too, including one of the worst contracts of the last decade.
by slamcactus on Jan 3, 2026 1:02 AM EST up reply actions
Rowand and Zito signings were not driven by Sabean; Lincecum too
Local scribe Andy Baggarly reported late last year that according to his sources, both internal to the Giants and in the league, neither signings were driven by Sabean. As many Giants fans suspected, it was most likely driven by former managing owner, Peter Magowan, and evidenced by the fact that Magowan was the one forced out and not Sabean. It was pretty clear to most of us that both signings were marketing driven.
I think it was pretty clear that the Blue Jays were the ones who started the Lincecum-Rios rumor, which, BTW, Sabean never confirmed, all he ever noted was that the Giants were not in a position to ignore any trade proposal, if it improved the team.
In fact, Sabean’s record in trades is pretty spotless, with only one really bad trade, the AJ trade. Still Baseball Prospectus liked that trade, so it was good in concept, not in the reality of dealing with a hot head athlete.
Sure, Sabean has made his mistakes in signings (which I also suspect was owner-driven, in a drive to try to win with Bonds). But I think the big picture shows that the Giants are positioned nicely for the future.
They have the rotation every team dreams about, and with extensions, would have that core with us for another 4-5 years. The bullpen has been retooled to a dominant group and given Bochy’s history of crafting great pens, most probably will continue to be dominant.
They have a core group of middle hitters in Posey and Sandoval, plus hopefully Belt. Brown and Panik look to fill out the top of the lineup in 2013-14. Crawford looks to be great defensively at SS and good enough offensively to not negate all that defense with his bat. That leave openings in the corner OF.
And with a great pitching staff and good fielding, they don’t need much offense to win 90+ games, around league average is all they need, and if that young core of hitters produce as expected, that should not be a problem.
Bochy even contributes by being one of the few managers capable of winning 1-run games consistently.
The Giants are in great shape for the future, which is all that should matter now, not past hurts over actual or perceived mistakes, over his non-cuddly persona, or any other prior issues. Sabean has put the Giants into a great position to be dominant the entire 2010 decade, the Decade of the Giants if the owners are smart enough to finance it.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 3, 2026 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
About Barry
1993 was the last race with the Braves. Then the strike. Then 2 4th place finishes. This part of Sabey Sabes gets conveniently forgotten as having Bonds is somehow the only reason for success, but coming into 1997 things weren’t all sparkly in Giantland. The interwebz was in it’s infancy, so there wasn’t a lot of debate, but I don’t remember Giants fans complaining much (after the initial “I am not an Idiot” dust up) from the moves put in place for 1997, and continuing down the line. We can talk until we’re blue in the face about Kent being a lucky throw-in, but the fact is he made the trade and Barry had a running partner for the next six years. He stole JT Snow. Rob Nen. Joe Carter. Ellis Burks. Livan. Big Cat. Jason Schmidt. 4 2nd place finishes, a wild card and 2 Western titles. And a massive bummer of a game 6. Then a reboot with some question marks, an absolute rampage of the NL West and another bummer of a game with Snow gunned at the plate to end it all.
The wheels came off, for sure. What was Sabean’s first bad trade? Most will say AJ/Nathan. I have a hard time with letting Kent go myself, but that was a multifaceted operation, involving not only Kent himself, Bonds, Sabean and PeteyM. Still from hindsight it was a mistake. The bigger mistake was not signing Vladdy.
But I have a problem with folks trying to take the Bonds years away from Sabean. He built those teams fair and square. 8 years of contention. Fans have a right to an exciting competitive ballclub. We don’t get the right to win everything all the time. That’s up to the Baseball Gods. They gave incredibly in 2010 and decided to take away big time in 2011. C’est la guerre.
At some point Giant fans are going to have to let go of the bunk ass Aaron Rowand signing, and batting practice Barry Zito. Those were bonehead moves, but they cost Sabean plenty, and he remembers them better and more painfully than any fans can. He’s found a new way to build a club, and he’s actually doubling down on it this offseason. We’re putting way more faith in the farm system than I thought possible. Its sort of scary actually, but it should be fun.
by shankbone on Jan 3, 2026 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed on the Bonds years
Other GMs may have been scared off by Bonds attitude but his bat was worth way more than his contract.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 3, 2026 8:45 PM EST up reply actions
i still think bonds can hit 15-20 Hr's in 2012
with a full spring training…
Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.
by James Westfall on Jan 4, 2026 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
The best part is playing in a game, would put of the damn HoF debate another 5 years.
Bye Travis and thanks for 2010! Good luck with the Brewers!
by kennv on Jan 7, 2026 1:12 PM EST up reply actions
he’s been unnecessarily antagonistic with the fan base after getting questioned about his moves (the lunatic fringe comment and Benitez situations come to mind) and has publicly called out his own players on occasion (calling young players “bad soldiers” and saying Posey couldn’t catch 100 games yet prior to the 2010 season, which only produced more criticism from a fan base hungry for a younger team.) I’m not saying all criticism is warranted, but he most often doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt because of this attitude.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 2, 2026 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
The fan base is hungry for a young team?
And you aren’t happy with Sandoval, Posey, LIncecum, Cain, Sanchez, Belt, Bumgarner? That young core is arguably one of the best in baseball. Also, they won a ring just 2 seasons ago! It seems insane that the fans wouldn’t be 100% in his corner.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 5:35 PM EST up reply actions
Sabean isn't criticized for winning the WS
but prior to that, before the 2010 season, he said Posey wasn’t ready to catch 100 games (the team’s #1 prospect and messiah), then backtracked and said Posey was the starter..then re-signed Molina, a player much disliked by much of the Giants fanbase due to his age and lack of plate discipline. You might think that’s a great way for a GM to act, but many (maybe even most) fans don’t. He was criticized for his handling of that situation. So during that time, the fan base was definitely hungry for a younger team on offense. that’s not a controversial statement.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 2, 2026 6:04 PM EST up reply actions
…And Zito, Huff, Sanchez, Rowand (who we still owe $12M), Lopez, and Affeldt. I don’t hate him at all; I think he’s decent. But it seems like we could be doing much, much, MUCH better with the young core you just mentioned. He’s undone some of that goodwill by allocating money extremely poorly, IMO.
by boonitez on Jan 2, 2026 6:05 PM EST up reply actions
good points
he’s probably a top 3rd GM skillwise, but his public attitude doesn’t do him any favors w/ the fans. The WS got him back in good graces with a lot of us, but that only lasts so long, especially because he rightly doesn’t get all the credit or the WS title.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 2, 2026 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
"that young core is arguably one of the best in baseball"
and Sabean made every attempt possible to prevent Posey and Belt from being a part of that core lol
by blue bulldog on Jan 2, 2026 9:56 PM EST up reply actions
He made every attempt to prevent Posey and Belt from being part of that core?
Belt had every opportunity this year and just didn’t perform (though I still love my baby Belt!) and keeping Posey down in an effort to Super 2 him (I seem to remember this being the reason though I could be wrong) and get him more practice behind the plate certainly didn’t hurt his development (he did win the ROY after all).
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 3, 2026 12:22 AM EST up reply actions
yeah
Super 2 would cost the Giants an extra what, $2 million?
i’m sure the Giants can’t find a way to squeeze that into their payroll, since they need to budget that money accordingly for the next Zito and Rowand
keeping Posey down in an effort to prevent Super 2 makes sense for a lot of teams. it doesn’t really make sense for a team with the financial capacity as the Giants.
as for Belt, the kid had a 98 wRC+ despite being yanked back and forth, in 200 PA. on the other hand, the Giants refused to let him get another 200 PA, because they wanted some dude with a wRC+ of 84 to have 600 PA to play 1B instead.
only in SF does “doing better than the old, grizzled incumbent” = non-performance
by blue bulldog on Jan 3, 2026 12:48 AM EST up reply actions
How did keeping Posey down hurt them?
They won the World Series, he won ROY, and they were able to Super 2 him. Where is the negative?
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 3, 2026 1:03 AM EST up reply actions
you're like the dude
at the poker table who calls all-in pre-flop with pocket sevens, and sucks out pocket aces, then asks “how did calling hurt me?”
i’m sure Sabean calculated that the Giants would eke into the playoffs on a torrid September run and that the Padres would just nicely collapse, to let the Giants take the division by two games
imagine if the Giants had lost that last game, and lost the one-game playoff. you think Giants fans would have wanted Posey to have an extra 150 PA or so, instead of Bengie?
at the end of the day it’s just a really simple question. is saving $2-3 million dollars worth the risk that you lose a couple extra games and not make the playoffs. the Giants FO answered yes (either that or they really thought Posey was a worse catcher than Bengie….which is a bigger problem). tells you a lot about the Giants FO.
by blue bulldog on Jan 3, 2026 2:00 AM EST up reply actions
I know that, at least, McCovey Chronicles would have self-destructed. Burnings of Sabean in e-effigy, oh man, it would have been awful.
Twitter Blog
"I never argue with people who say baseball is boring because baseball is boring. Except, suddenly, it isn't. And that's what makes it great."
-Joe Posnanski
by free f.p. #14 on Jan 3, 2026 3:01 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe they didn't think Posey was a worse catcher than Benjie.....
Perhaps they just thought he could use more seasoning, not surprising since he had not been catching very long, on the defensive side of things.
Also, you can try to spin a 98 wRC+ as a positive sign for Belt but the fact remains he hit poorly in his first chance in the majors and there was no point wasting him by sitting him on the bench.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 3, 2026 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
this would suggest two much bigger problems with your FO
1) they like to play players that they think are worse than alternative players available
2) and they love small sample sizes when it comes to young players. Belt was given 50 PA to have a “first chance in the majors.” he sucked it up and was sent down, despite many scoutheads and statheads alike thinking that Belt simply needed some more time in the majors to adjust. and what do you know, when Belt comes up after spending some more time in the minors doing what he’s always done in AAA, he started playing well. meanwhile, Huff was given near 600 PA of playing time, despite sucking.
by blue bulldog on Jan 3, 2026 2:59 PM EST up reply actions
Not exactly true
Belt did hit very poorly in his first 50 PA, but did not come up and hit well in his second time up, he actually hit about as bad as before (I’m not counting the brief time up before being injured and DLed). In fact he continued to hit that poorly in the start of his third time up in the majors, and, with 153 MLB PA and 212 AAA PA under his belt, before he started hitting better, as it was near the end of the season when he started to look like he finally figured out what he’s suppose to be doing on a consistent, day-in day-out basis, and who knows if that was just small samples or not.
And for comparison, from the point at which Belt came back July 19th and got more playing time, here is what both he and Huff did to the end of the season:
Belt: .231/.296/.469/.765 in 142 PA, 11 BB, 42 K’s, 130 AB
Huff: .274/.348/.396/.744 in 187 PA, 19 BB, 27 K’s, 164 AB
Given that the Giants had a player who was producing just as well offensively in Huff, and they had a young hitter who was struggling to avoid strikeouts in Belt, I think it could be argued that he should have seen more time in AAA. I want Belt to be the hitter he appeared in AA and not become a Dave Kingman type if he struggles and develop bad habits in the majors. All the interviews with him I’ve seen had him noting that he was struggling mentally with the failures he was having in the majors, and Bochy noted that he was carrying it around with him. He still needed seasoning in the minors to reach his potential and not have it short-circuited by keeping him struggling in the majors and messing with his mind and his mechanics.
I don’t want a slugger who swings and misses a lot, just to get that one homer. I want the complete hitter we saw in him in AA in 2010, who hits for average, takes a lot of walks, don’t strike out a great amount of times, and hits for power and homers. He performed poorly in the majors until the end of the season, and even then he was still striking out a lot, only now he was also hitting for a lot of homers as well. Still, he wasn’t hitting for average nor walking a lot either, he was just good for a homer or nothing. That is not what the Giants need from him in the middle of the lineup.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 3, 2026 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed
I LOVE BELT! I have been hyping this kid before it was cool, but he simply didn’t perform in the majors last year.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 3, 2026 8:47 PM EST up reply actions
Lots of Giants fans believe what they want to believe
Like that they know the prospects better than the organization.
Here are the key bits of info that many either don’t know or gloss over:
- The Giants said before the season that Posey did not have enough stamina to last more than 100 games starting at catcher. If you look at his game by game stats, he went into a slump right around the 100 start mark if you combine minors and majors, and that lasted the rest of the season. He also admitted after the season that he was physically spent and that he needed the rest before the playoffs to freshen up physically. I think that was a reason why the Giants played him at 1B at lot early on, so that he could work on his offense in the majors without wearing him down more by catching full-time.
- Most of the fans are in denial that Posey was hitting under 700 OPS after 6 weeks in the majors. It was not like he dominated from the start and continued that, he still had things to figure out, clearly. As a contrast, Sandoval was hitting in the minors and did not skip a beat getting promoted to the majors.
- They were also in denial that Posey did not start out the 2010 season in the minors very well, not understanding that hitting well in Fresno is not the same as doing it in SF. The MinorLeagueSplits MLE calculator pegged Posey’s MLE to be in the .700 OPS range, from what I recall, which was not close to what Molina hit in April. He didn’t really start hitting until early May, then had a bad week, then was hot again for a while, then the Giants brought him up at that time, when his stroke was going well. He continued it for about a week, but then slumped badly until the end of July.
- Baseball America thought that Posey was not ready for the majors either, noting that his defense still needed work. So the people complaining are also saying that BA don’t know what they were talking about either, not just the Giants.
- Lastly, there is nothing wrong with holding back a player to save on Super-2, though I suspect that this is not a reason that held him back, as he clocked time in September the season before, so he should be a Super-2 after next season, if I understand how all that works, particularly under the new CBA rules on Super-2. In any case, the Giants noted all along that they would bring him up when they thought he was ready. Given how things worked out, it appears that they were correct.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 3, 2026 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
Your figures are off by a bit.
Most of the fans are in denial that Posey was hitting under 700 OPS after 6 weeks in the majors
He was brought up May 29, which puts his 6 week mark almost exactly at the All Star break, July 11. At that point he was hitting .350/.395/.569 for a .964 OPS.
The MinorLeagueSplits MLE calculator pegged Posey’s MLE to be in the .700 OPS range, from what I recall
Posey’s MLE for his time in Fresno in 2010 (by MLS calculator) was .296/.370/.452 which would have to have been considered nothing short of outstanding. It’s also pretty close to what he ended up with that year (though he had less OBP and more power) and is very very close to his career line thus far.
which was not close to what Molina hit in April
Ironically that MLE was almost exactly what Molina hit in April (.825 OPS v. Posey’s MLE of .822 OPS) and of course vastly more than Molina hit in May (.531 OPS).
by Roger on Jan 3, 2026 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
Minor League Splits had it as 0.286/0.351/0.381/0.732 in April 2010 for Posey
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/?comments_popup=28483
As I noted, the OPS was for his April, not his time in Fresno, because he started figuring out the hitting in May.
Thank you for correcting on the timing, yes, it was closer to 5 weeks (33 days). On June 30th, Posey was hitting .289/.314/.381/.695, or under .700 OPS.
Thanks also for correcting on Molina, very bad memory there. Maybe I flipped the numbers there, as he was about 100 points higher OPS than Posey for April.
In any case, my point on that should have been that Molina was still hitting .880 OPS on May 12th, hard to imagine Posey doing that much better given his struggles in June 2010.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
He has an antagonizing habit of seemingly:
1. Making decisions based entirely on his gut without paying much heed to more objective forms of evaluation.
2. Paying for outlying career years and acting like the continuation of that level of performance is a reasonable expectation.
3. Undervaluing prospects and overvaluing experience. Then, as a result, crying poor when he has a ton of money tied up in past-their-date players (who were often past their date at the time of signing.)
4. Coming off as a condescending bore anytime anybody has the gall to question his decisions.
That said, he does a decent job of fielding a competitive team. Personally I think he legacy will hinge a lot on how he deals with the impending free agency of Lincecum and Cain.
by BestHyperboleEver on Jan 2, 2026 6:15 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t disagree with that, though I think the ownership pressures have a lot to do with no. 2 and 3. But it’s really the no. 4 that kills any goodwill he has with the fans. he might be a nice guy in private (i have my doubts), but in public he’s a jerk and thus he doesn’t get much sympathy or benefit of the doubt. it makes fans quick to criticize his moves, even if the moves are reasonable in a baseball sense.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 2, 2026 6:32 PM EST up reply actions
I posted up above to say I appreciate the core of players we have, on the Big Gigantes as well as the farm system, not to start a Sabean discussion, so I apologize for that. As Giants fans its easy to go down the rabbit hole of Sabey Sabes, he’s the longest tenured GM in Giants history and 15 years is a helluva lot of rope. I believe he is trying something different, as he has had successful results with the farm system now, and is no longer viewing it as a trading post.
I have a different view on the press conferences, which are the main avenue for his decisions to be questioned - I see them as high comedy and a treasure hunt for clues on the state of the franchise as he can’t help himself with his plainspokenness despite his secretive efforts. Is he short, rude and abrasive? Sure. Does he throw down classic quotes? Sure. I’m not an idiot. Lunatic Fringe. Kicking the Tires. If we don’t see him again. The Vladdy quote. All delivered with that clipped New England tough guy accent.
Nice guy in private: well, his whole crew of greybeards, led by Dick Tidrow, are all incredibly loyal to him and have been with the guy forever. If he’s such a jerk, how does he have the same guys with him for this long? They tend to be more scouting oriented than stats oriented, but there are some clues that isn’t necessarily set in stone. They seem to know pitching pretty well, and are incredibly old school in a new era of baseball knowledge and analysis. I would go further, I’d call them the Monks of MLB. They seem to be getting more secretive and close to the vest as they go on. Notice they are always the last team to announce non-tenders or other deadline moves?
I guess I view him as most the people I know in life, flawed. You take the good with the bad. I grew up on the late 70s early 80s Gints. I have enjoyed the Sabean years immensely. Do I have criticisms? Yes. Can I forgive some of the bonehead moves? Yes. Everybody is up in arms about the offseason, but he didn’t go out and sign Coco Crisp to a 3 year contract now did he?
by shankbone on Jan 2, 2026 7:40 PM EST up reply actions
Great points
My thoughts exactly. Sabean isn’t perfect but he is definitely above average at what he does.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 3, 2026 12:23 AM EST up reply actions
Since when does a GM's personality factor into how to evaluate his performance?
I would rather have a Sabean, who has put out a winning team for us most years than not, plus who has gotten us to the playoffs many more times than the Giants had done in the roughly 25 years before he became GM, and more importantly, got us the Championship we have all desired, than a slick Beane, who talks a good game with the fans.
Ultimately, though, the reason he had to sell off his team this year is because he made stupid trades - imagine how good his team would have been if he still had Ethier and CarGon in the lineup in 2010 and 2011, or if he actually got any prospects worth anything from Atlanta for Hudson, same for Holliday and Swisher, or if he didn’t let both Tejada and Giambi go free agent for nothing but picks (horrible strategy due to the low odds of finding talent with them) - and has not been successful in the draft in a long time. Furthermore, his flawed strategy is what precipitated this sell-off, he was in the middle of rebuilding, then goes and spends $10M on Sheets (for nothing production) plus trades for Holliday. What exactly is his strategy, and why is it changing willy-nilly?
Sabean, meanwhile, has had a strategy of building up the pitching rotation since basically when Tidrow joined his staff. He had some good prospects early on in Ainsworth, Williams, and Foppert, but also bad luck, until Cain and Lowry, then hit big with Sanchez, Lincecum, and Bumgarner. I can remember interviews early in the 2000’s where he talked about building a team about pitching, fielding, and speed. And he did that in spite of having to deal with ownership’s desire to have a championship while Bonds was still playing.
People don’t appreciate how hard it is to actually build a team via the draft. The odds of finding a good starting player while winning is very low. It is still not that great when you are losing, but at least it is exponentially better than when you are winning (about 2-4 times more likely).
The Braves did it right: lose horribly for years, get great picks until you find the player you can build around (Chipper in their case) and go from there. Even then, they never had a team full of homegrown players, it was always a mix.
The Giants, if the owners OK the money, should have a team full of homegrown players: Lincecum, Cain, Bumgarner, Wilson, Romo, maybe Runzler or Hembree, Posey, Sandoval, Schierholtz, Crawford, and eventually, hopefully, Brown, Panik, Susac, Joseph, about half the team. That is pretty good for a four year period of losing, usually you have to lose for a much longer period to do that.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
the point is/was
that because of his personality, many fans will be a bit quicker to criticize Sabean’s borderline/questionable moves rather than give a benefit of the doubt. it’s a PR kinda thing, not necessarily a bottom line thing.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 4, 2026 9:09 PM EST up reply actions
So what you're saying is
That it is better to have a GM like BIlly Beane who can smooze the public and media into thinking he’s the doing well, when he ruined his team by 1) letting go free agents for lousy draft picks, 2) signing the wrong player to a big long-term contract that handcuffed his team’s already small finances, 3) trading away Ethier for Milton Bradley when Ethier was ready to join the majors and in fact hit better than Bradley the next season, 4) trading away Tim Hudson for nothing, 5) do the rebuild yo-yo by trading off players, then switching strategy soon afterward and trading for Holliday (and losing CarGon) then wasting $10M on Sheets while trying to be competitive, only to rebuild again a couple of years later, effectively turning CarGon and Huston Street into Michael Taylor. Then blame all that on his lack of finances, while the A’s have pulled in around $120M in EBITDA (free cash flow, which is used to measure valuation nowadays) in the past 6 seasons, when if he would have just held the hand he was given, he would have all that glorious pitching plus Ethier and CarGon in the middle of his lineup in 2010 and 2011.
Sabean, meanwhile, has built a pitching staff, mostly of young pitchers, which has been in the top 3 in Runs Allowed for three seasons now, supported by a strong defense (as measured by Plus/Minus system in Fielding BIble), and with a lineup that is shaping out to have Sandoval, Posey, and Belt in the middle, and hopefully Brown and Panik up top. And won a World Series Championship with that core of a team. But fans have a problem with that because he’s not soft and cuddly and talks nicely to the fanbase, like that good looking chap across the bay.
As a former Giants manager once was quoted, “Nice guys finish last”. :^)
I gladly accept Sabean, warts and all. After living through the 70’s and 80’s lack of competition, I applaud the work he has done to keep the Giants competitive throughout much of his career and especially applaud the team he has put together in the past few years that culminated in 2010’s World Championship.
Lots of you didn’t believe in him before the championship and still give him the back of the hand by claiming that 2010 was just luck. It was not just luck, he put together that young core of the team with his strategy of pitching and fielding, which he has spoke about all the time he has been GM. All teams encounter some amount of luck every season, least of which is BABIP luck, so by tarring the Giants 2010 World Championship, you basically said that all championships are just luck, no need to give credit. You guys just don’t realize that linkage, how broadly your diminishment of his accomplishment applies to all baseball, all sports.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 7, 2026 1:17 AM EST up reply actions
all else being equal
the amount of success teams have (as measured by wins and playoff appearances) should be directly proportional to their financial capability, relative to those in their division
it is undeniable in my mind, that the Giants have under-performed during Sabean’s regime considering how much money they have relative to the other teams in their division. this shows that all else isn’t equal, and strongly implies that the Giants front office is inferior to other front office’s in terms of its decision-making
for better or worse, Sabean is the figure-head of that front office. this is why he gets criticized so much
by blue bulldog on Jan 2, 2026 3:21 PM EST up reply actions
Using that logic, the Doyers should be kings of the west. In fact, during the Sabean years, they’ve only had success in 2004, 2006, 2008-9, a.k.a. the dark years of Sabey Sabes.
I’m all for busting on Sabean’s bonehead moves. An overall track record of 1 Championship, 1 Pennant, 4 Western Titles, 6 2nd place finishes in 15 years is pretty good. It did get pretty dark in 2005-8, I think a lot of fans think we’re headed back there. I don’t, but time will tell.
by shankbone on Jan 2, 2026 3:32 PM EST up reply actions
So I'm not seeing where he failed
Over his 15 seasons, the Giants have made the playoffs 5 times, 2 World Series, 1 Championship.
Arizona is the only one to do similar: 5 playoffs, 1 WS, 1 Champs. However, while they have been spending less in recent years, they were spending similar to the Giants when they won their championship, that is why those owners went bankrupt and nearly brought down the team.
As Shankbone noted, LAD only had 4 playoffs and 0 WS/Champs. They have clearly spent a lot more money than the Giants over that time.
Colorado has made only 2 playoffs, 1 WS, 0 champs. Which seems about right to me, actually Giants probably has done better because they are not spending more than twice what the Rockies spend, yet have double the playoffs and WS, plus the championship.
SD is the only one where maybe they clearly outperformed the Giants per your definition of success via wins and playoffs. They made 3 playoffs, plus 1 WS, but 0 champs and spends about a third of the Giants now. But just a few years ago, it was close to 50% of the Giants, so 3 playoffs vs. 5, plus the Giants did win the World Series, I would at worse call that equal, but mostly tip it to the Giants for winning it all.
So, four NL West teams, Giants based on your definition, probably outperformed 3 of the 4, and the fourth, AZ, benefited from overspending early in their franchise life, as evidenced by their near bankruptcy, which skewed the ratio greatly, as three of those playoffs were in their first 5 seasons as a franchise.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 1:31 PM EST up reply actions
Not to be a jerk, but where do you see the promising players in the Giants farm system?
With only 7 players B- or above, this appears to me to be one of the bottom 5 (perhaps bottom 10) minor league systems in terns of talent.
by Looney4baseball on Jan 2, 2026 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t get too hung up on B- or C+ grades. Its an inexact science, and that’s one thing John does very well at explaining, even if people choose to ignore him.
The Giants have had the reputation for developing pitching for a long time now. Their picks of Crick, Bandilla, Marlowe, Osich and Black should pay dividends. They stole Blackburn. They have DSL signings that are very interesting. The pitching might take some time to develop, but the track record is there.
Coupled with some actual hitters - Brown, Panik and Sanchez in particular, but also Ricky O and Susak, plus the speedy CF depth in Payne, Galindo and Hill look good.
The Giants are competing again, we can’t get the high #5-10 draft picks. The fact they’ve snagged Brown and Panik in the 20s shows me they have better guys scouting and making picks now. Barr is of course the figurehead for that.
I also don’t get hung up on bottom 5 rankings. That seems low, I’d say trending towards the middle of the pack, maybe #17-20 overall, but I wouldn’t really care one way or the other about that, its more about the change in philosophy that has gone on: no more punt the draft picks Michael Tucker/Benitez style, emphasis on getting hitters, etc.
by shankbone on Jan 2, 2026 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
a lot of their Grade C guys have a chance to be more than that, but are just too far away or are just getting started.
No matter how well you explain it, a letter grade is shorthand.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
I understand the letter grades are shorthand,
I was just interested as to what players he found promising. I looked over the rankings and read the captions for each player and the 1-2 sentences on the players which provided short blubs as to your information/feelings on each player. I was just looking for additional insight, which is why I will be purchasing your book again (for the 5th or 6th year in a row).
by Looney4baseball on Jan 2, 2026 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
There are a few players with lowish grades (Susac, Osich, Blackburn Krick) who show a good amount of promise but simply don’t have the pro data to rank any higher. He did say Susac was one of his favorites of this year’s draft.
by boonitez on Jan 2, 2026 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
Change in emphasis due to change in circumstances
Once they got their pitching set, then they could focus on getting hitters.
The draft is not conducive to rebuilding an entire team all at once. I like that they focused more of their high picks on pitching first, to build up their rotation and bullpen, then once that was done, then they focused more of their best bullets on hitters.
It’s like I’ve been writing for years now, focusing on pitching is the quickest way to rebuild any team, when you find a good pitcher, you have 11-12 slots you can fit him into, the cream rises to the top, but if you end up with 2-3 position players at the same spot where they can’t move (like Texas with 3 great 1B in Teixiera, Hafner, and A-Gon), you are forced to either play some out of position, weakening fielding defense, or to trade the excess away, which adds a lot of risk to the rebuilding process because you could end up with duds.
So I see it as a natural evolution as the Giants team has improved over the years. I expect the Giants to start picking up more pitching with their top picks going forward, maybe not 2012, but soon, because Lincecum, Cain, and Bumgarner won’t be here forever, either via free agency or age/performance issues.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
The only problem that I have with Sabean
is that he has a knack for not doing enough or at least it appears that way…I think most rational people can agree that the Giants have about a 3 year window to be WS contenders while we have a staff of cain, lincecum, madbum. By actively not fixing the glaring offensive weakness and hoping for players to rebound it just feels like the window is closing and the miracle of 2010 is all that we will have to show for it…which isnt terrible im sure there are dozens of teams who wish they had a ring in the last 10 years, but it just doesnt feel like enough.
plus trading our best pitching prospect for a 2 month rental really really really sucks.
Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.
by James Westfall on Jan 4, 2026 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
You say that he doesn't do enough to win but then get mad that he trades for a 2 month rental?
Seems kind of contradictory.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 4, 2026 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Pretty much
I’m likely in the vast minority on a site such as this, but I almost never fault a GM for those types of trades & Carlos Beltran performed well after the move too. Brian Sabean made a point of alluding to the fact that improving the present day team was a priority for the fans if memory serves also as the offensive output of the defending WS champions was putrid at the time.
I’ve never understood the simplistic & often contradictory vitriol that seems to accompany Sabean myself as he’s been pretty successful. I think a lot of it comes from glib comments here & there in the media, but who really knows.
by Matt0330 on Jan 5, 2026 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
He’s in a bad spot with this one. He has a rep of never trading for a rental. So he goes for it. Things don’t work out. If he signs Beltran up and Don Carlos gets hurt, it’ll be “Sabean chased after a gimpy vet to get value for Wheeler, he always goes after fragile vets”. Instead the Cards take the chance at what looks to be a nice value deal providing he stays healthy and its “Sabean signed two lefties, Eli Whiteside and our offense sucks!” I think its a good laydown myself, and I have admired Beltran for over a decade.
He took a shot. I think you always take a shot. Losing Wheeler hurts a lot, but I respect going for it, and we’ll move on. You can’t have it both ways.
I love Beltran’s bat, but he is a risk. He does not run the bases well, steal bases anymore or field well. The guys Sabean traded for will do that part much better. Now they won’t be putting up 900 OPS either, so its a tradeoff. But Sabean got a 27 year old and a 30 year old, both with upside in the tank, avoided a 35 year old injury risk proven vet, and more importantly avoided Coco Crisp or David Dejesus. That to me shows a change in mentality from 5 years ago. Will it work? We’ll see…
Last, its only Bill James projections, he’s an optimist, and they have to play the games, but here’s Beltran’s for next year:
128 games played, 279/369/480 slg, 20 HR, 8 SB
Here is a certain left handed highly touted 1B/OF:
151 games played, 266/358/482 slg, 25 HR, 11 SB
The Giants are playing their kids. We’ll see how it shakes out. With Belt, I’m a bit tired of the mantra that somehow the Giants hate him. They definitely mishandled him last year, but I think it was more being greedy dreaming of the next Posey, injury circumstances and some badly handled PR (yes, a Sabean specialty!). They scouted him, drafted him and developed him. The Giants love Belt. Somehow fans have decided that Belt is their precious and mean Bruce Bochy is screwing it up. I don’t agree with that narrative, and while I don’t expect 151 games from Belt, I think he’ll be in the mix.
Winning with home grown talent instead of dustbin vets is way more fun. I love this team.
by shankbone on Jan 5, 2026 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
Well to be fair those complainers suck
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 2, 2026 5:21 PM EST up reply actions
"...was a personal favorite..."
John, I’m amazed how often we agree on draft guys… You noted Nimmo with the Mets and Susac with the Giants… Anyway, keep up the good work.
-peter
by PeterF on Jan 2, 2026 12:29 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Gritty gamerness
How much weight does the gritty gamerness tool have for player evaluations? Joe Panik plays with fire, so he much be a 75 or so. Gary Brown seems to have a lot of this quality. Can this quality bump a prospect with lesser tools over a more talented guy?
by ScoutFinch on Jan 2, 2026 2:38 PM EST reply actions
I feel like Hector Sanchez is getting short-changed in prospect rankings this year. Can someone explain to me why I'm wrong?
What I see is a very young switch-hitting catcher with defense that will play in the majors, who held his own after a huge jump to AAA and the Majors despite being 21 years old. He makes great contact and has power upside that he’s already shown.
Compare that to a guy like Austin Romine, who has received higher grades despite being older, with similar defensive skills and less upside with the bat, and who suffers from a platoon disadvantage Sanchez doesn’t. Romine is a C+ this year, but has been seen as a B-/B player in the past before his poor 2011. Why wouldn’t Sanchez be seen as similar to or better than 2010 Romine?
If it’s my list, then Sanchez is at least a B-. I wouldn’t take Peguero over him, and certainly not Surkamp or Crick.
by PissedMick on Jan 2, 2026 2:41 PM EST reply actions
Hec-Tor
I’d say his perceived ceiling is what is limiting him. The Backup label is getting tossed around. Personally I think he’s going to be a mini-Pablo, and I like his chances to make the 25 with a good spring. Posey will need 50 games off this year, and having a potent bat (something the Gints desperately need) off the bench for the other 100 would be good. Does that limit his development? 50 MLB starts and maybe another 40-50 game chances versus 100-110 minor league games? The fact the Giants rushed him up, basically throwing stuff against the wall hoping for Sando 2.0, tells me they really like his bat. If he can ride his success from the VWL into spring and rake, the G’s will have a nice tough decision to make.
by shankbone on Jan 2, 2026 2:52 PM EST up reply actions
sanchez
I gave both Sanchez and Romine C+ grades but I like Sanchez a little better. I think his glove is more refined
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 3:18 PM EST up reply actions
He's a B- in my book
I think there’s a decent chance he turns into a solid regular. I definitely like him more than Romine.
Bullpen Banter
MLB Bonus Baby
Twitter Account: @Ioffridus
by Jeff Reese on Jan 2, 2026 5:36 PM EST up reply actions
Chris Marlow
John, anything specific to Marlow that gets him a top-20 ranking? In my mind, you can just throw all the power armed college arms the Giants took near the top of the draft last year (Bandilla, Black, Law…) into a hat and pick names. They all profile the same… great arms, live FBs, great K-rates and horrible control.
"When the Giants call up a 21-year-old Venezuelan catcher who started the year in San Jose, was hitting well with poor plate discipline, but wasn't on Baseball America's preseason list of the organization's 30 best prospects, only good things can happen."
Congratulations, Hector!
by tedfordfan on Jan 2, 2026 3:05 PM EST reply actions
yeah
Well I got to see Marlowe in college. But you’re right, you can just throw the Grade Cs into a hat if you like.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
I like the Giant’s approach to power arms… kind of like buying lottery tickets…
"When the Giants call up a 21-year-old Venezuelan catcher who started the year in San Jose, was hitting well with poor plate discipline, but wasn't on Baseball America's preseason list of the organization's 30 best prospects, only good things can happen."
Congratulations, Hector!
by tedfordfan on Jan 2, 2026 6:17 PM EST up reply actions
I was surprised
during the year when it turned out that they had so many interesting catching prospects. A depth chart of Posey/Sanchez/Joseph/Susac is remarkable.
by charles wallace on Jan 2, 2026 6:12 PM EST reply actions
surprised adalberto mejia didn't make the top 20
I’m guessing you are waiting for him to make his US debut before making an opinion.
Adoptive father of 18th round draft pick and future ace, BRANDON ALLEN
by Nnamdi Asomugha on Jan 2, 2026 6:54 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
this system is worse than the previous Yankees
and has had a drop off, in part due to the trade of Wheeler the graduation of Belt and almost Surrkamp.
I really like the Lefty OHHH and Mad Bum. who could be a top LH SP for years for them.
he’s awesome, if i was the Giants !>!!>!> i’d only extend 1 of Cain/ Lincecum and would ABSOLUTELY extend Bumgarner now or very soon.
Yoenis Cespedes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW9ge8l3jY8
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jan 2, 2026 7:01 PM EST reply actions
Well, that partly because they are so good at picking/developing
Other teams would have their Posey and Bumgarner’s still in the farm at their ages and still filling up their Top N rankings and looking good, while the Giants have already graduated them to the majors already. Even Belt was not on any ranking list more than one season, if they would have kept him in the minors in 2011, where he could have learned more about avoiding strikeouts, he would head up the rankings and the farm system is that much better looking.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 12:42 AM EST up reply actions
Common John!?
Bandilla and Correa (definite reliever a next level), but especially Villalona not in top-20…. Villalona was a top-3 two years ago before his incident and is only 21 and has that prison strength, dude is going to tear it up. I’m going to have him in my top-15 or even 10 for sure!
Plus, I know Pill is getting a little old to be a prospect, but if your putting him in the mix, he has to be top-20 too. He could probably be a league average first basemen in the NL right now if given the opp., I think anyway.
by trecole696 on Jan 2, 2026 7:28 PM EST reply actions
Pill was barely above league average for a 1B in his second go-round in AAA. What makes you think he would be league average in MLB?
by BestHyperboleEver on Jan 3, 2026 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
Flores Not Bandilla
I meant, how now Kendry Flores!? (20 years old- 16-9, 3.46, 160:50 K/BB ratio in 166 innings)…. Definitely has some top-20 potential!
by trecole696 on Jan 2, 2026 7:36 PM EST reply actions
kelsdad
since you don’t use stats, just post your top 100 at some time in fanposts. It would be helpful to get a list without stats because we can compare that with MLEs and stuff.
by Bososx13 on Jan 2, 2026 7:57 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
John,
Where would Brown rank, roughly, in your top 50 hitters and top 100 overall prospects? And is he the only Giants prospect to make either list, or does Panik come close?
Twitter Blog
"I never argue with people who say baseball is boring because baseball is boring. Except, suddenly, it isn't. And that's what makes it great."
-Joe Posnanski
by free f.p. #14 on Jan 2, 2026 10:05 PM EST reply actions
I don't know yet.
Not in Top 20. In Top 50. I should know by this time next week.
by John Sickels on Jan 2, 2026 10:51 PM EST up reply actions
Looking back at some of the archives here
Tim was Graded A
Bum and Posey were 1 and 2 twice, each spending a year at A and A-. Bum’s second time on the list he was debatibly B+ I guess.
Wheeler is B+, Brown is B+ this year. The biggest difference in all those, is 4 were top 10 picks, the other is Brown. The only top 10 not rated A- is in AA and well behind Bumgarner at his age.
If the Giants can indeed keep Cain, Tim and Bum re-signed, I am very very glad Brown was the prospect kept last year in the Beltran stakes. Also, Panik looking good so far too, hope he pans out.
Blerg
by Myemail21479 on Jan 3, 2026 4:11 PM EST reply actions
Good stuff John
1. I seem to be one of the few people that is as high on Andrew Susac as you are - I actually have him rated at #3 ahead of Tommy Joseph. I really liked what I saw from Susac in the NCAA Regional and Super-Regional last year. The defensive improvements that he made between the end of the 2010 college season and the end of the 2011 college season were very noticeable and substantial. I saw Buster Posey play at least 10 games (in person and on TV) in his final college season for FSU, and I have no doubt that Susac is a better defensive catcher now than Posey was when he left college. Of course, Posey is a much better all-around hitter at the same point in their careers and Susac won’t necessarily continue to improve his game to the point that he eventually reaches or exceeds the level of defense and game-management that Posey displayed during his 2010 rookie year in the majors.
2. I think that you’re too low on Hector Sanchez in terms of grade (I think he’s a B-) and ranking. Of the top 3 catchers in the org (including Susac and Joseph), Hector’s got the best toolset and is the most athletic, IMO. He’s already shown that he can hit for average, hit for power, and work a walk - just not all at the same time yet. The knock on him was always that he wasn’t serious about putting in the work and long hours to perfect his game keep his body in good physical shape. One of the reasons that he broke out and opened eyes in 2011 is that he came to spring training in good shape and ready to work. As long as he keeps his weight under control, I don’t see how he doesn’t become a starting catcher in the majors for some team.
3. Adalberto Mejia has to be in the top 20 in this system, IMHO. I understand that you want to see what he does in the States before giving too much credence to his outstanding 2011 pro debut season in the DomRep (where he was dominating). However, and I’m not sure that you know this,the Giants brought Mejia to Arizona in September and he spent more than a month pitching in the AZ Instructional League. The Giants have never done that with a DSL pitcher before, so it’s pretty easy to conclude that they think that he can be fast-tracked in 2012. I expect he’ll be pitching in the ss-A NWL in 2012 (at the age of 18) at a minimum, and he may even vault all the way to the Sally if he has an impressive enough spring training.
4. I like Jarrett Parker‘s tools, but I just don’t see that he can make enough contact and hit for enough power to ever be more than a defense-first utility OF. I saw him play several times as a junior in college and, though he made some changes to his mechanics in 2011, I still don’t think he’s fixed what I saw that was wrong with his bat back in college.
5. I like Joan Gregorio too, but I just don’t see anyway to rank him ahead of Kendry Flores. Flores is only 2 months older than Gregorio, but he’s one full season ahead of him in terms of level played, he has better stuff than Gregorio according to the reports I’ve heard and seen, and he has better peripherals than Gregorio. Flores pitched in the AZL when he was almost a full year younger than Gregorio was this year, but he had better numbers across the board:
IP: 55 vs. 51.3, K/9: 9.1 vs. 7.7, BB/9: 2.1 vs. 2.9, K/BB: 4.3 vs. 2.7, WHIP: 1.13 vs. 1.17, GO/AO: 1.23 vs. 1.20
6. Bryce Bandilla (in your Honorable Mention category) was reportedly diagnosed with having an issue with the labrum in his throwing shoulder after he signed his contract with the Giants. That’s why he didn’t make his pro debut in 2011. Anytime a pitcher has an issue with his labrum it’s hard to project any positive future for them.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 3, 2026 6:48 PM EST reply actions
1. If you thought he was impressive during the post season, you should have seen him before the hamate injury. He was a MUCH better player prior to that injury. Susac had an offensive and defensive swagger and was by the best player on the field when I watched OSU games. He never really got going afterwards. I’m a very big fan, and I would only take Brown ahead of him.
Bullpen Banter
MLB Bonus Baby
Twitter Account: @Ioffridus
by Jeff Reese on Jan 3, 2026 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
that should be "by far"
Bullpen Banter
MLB Bonus Baby
Twitter Account: @Ioffridus
by Jeff Reese on Jan 3, 2026 8:26 PM EST up reply actions
Good to know
I didn’t have a chance to see him pre-injury, although I’ve seen several short vid clips. Another thing that I neglected to add about him is that he was an elite catching prospect as a high school senior, he was one of the 2 best catchers in the Cape Cod League as a freshman in college, then he was the best college catcher in the draft following his sophomore season. He has consistently been one of the top 2 or 3 catchers in his age group for at least 3 years.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 3, 2026 8:49 PM EST up reply actions
Sanchez
has had a heckuva winter too. Good call on Susac’s defensive rep coming out of HS. I think he may have to tone down that leg lift, and the tendency to glide as he puts that foot down, but he’s got good hands and hand/eye coordination. Very nice get.
by charles wallace on Jan 3, 2026 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
I like Sanchez too
Not as optimistic about his ultimate upside as with Susac, but it’s pretty easy to see a solid regular emerging. I’ll be interested to see how this plays out.
Bullpen Banter
MLB Bonus Baby
Twitter Account: @Ioffridus
by Jeff Reese on Jan 4, 2026 9:18 AM EST up reply actions
Agree that Susac should be rated ahead of Sanchez.
As an aside, Sabean needs to start strategizing right now on how to best leverage this embarrasment of riches (in terms of catchers) into some good things in the trade market in the next 6 to 24 months. Between Susac, Joseph and Sanchez he should be able to get one starting C for SF (move Posey to 1B, LF or 2B) and 2 coveted trade chips. I’m not saying that all 3 will become starters in the majors, just that at some point in the next 2 years all 3 should have enough sustained success in the minors to allow Sabes to trade for 2 of the following 3 needs: SS, corner OF, or starting pitcher. In a perfect world, I would hold onto Susac and trade Sanchez and Joseph at some point when their value is at or near their peaks.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 4, 2026 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
I was going to ask,
where you thought Posey fit best. He obviously had an amateur history as a SS, so is a Biggio-like move to 2B an option in your opinion?
by charles wallace on Jan 4, 2026 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
He can’t play SS in the majors, but I believe that he could be a fringe-average defensive 2B with a lot of work and a year’s experience under his belt. But, I do believe that Joe Panik is the future Giants 2B so that’s not a greeat fit.
Posey’s best position in the majors (besides catcher) would be 3B (he has the arm, soft hands, quick feet and quick reflexes to be an above-average defender there), but Pablo Sandoval has that spot locked up for the foreseeable future.
Posey could be a very good defensive 1B in as little as a few months experience, but his bat wouldn’t be as valuable there and the Giants have a logjam at 1B with Belt and Pill.
Looking at the Giants’ likely future roster, LF appears to be the best fit for Posey, where I’m sure that he could play at least average D.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 4, 2026 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
Sleepers
Keep an eye on these Giant prospects that haven’t been mentioned yet.
Demondre Arnold: signed in the 25th round out of a Georgia JuCo following his freshman season (he was drafted by Tampa Bay in the 37th round in the 2010 draft). His FB is lively, sits 90-92 mph, and touches 94. He should start out in the Sally in 2012 after looking extremely poised and effective in 16 games out of the pen in his pro debut in the AZ Rookie League this past summer:
K/9=10.8, BB/9=2.7, K/BB=4.0, BAA=.182, ERA=1.69, GO/AO=1.47
Here’s a vid of him pitching for his JuCo team during Jan & Feb 2011: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTieeypHFT4
Tyler Mizenko: signed in the 2 round out of a non-major college in the Southeast. He was one of the top college closers in the nation in 2010, but his stock dropped when he had inconsistent results after switching to a starting role for the 2011 college season. He pitched with good results for 2 summers in the Cape Cod League.
Drew Stiner: Dylan Bundy’s high school catcher. The Giants were able to sign him despite an Okla. St. Uni. scholarship and a 43rd rond draft slot. He is smart and athletic, with a plus arm, excellent defensive skills, and some of the best pop times of any catcher in the draft. With the bat, Stiner has fringe-plus raw power, a good batting eye, and excellent plate discipline. Here are 2 vids of him in a pre-draft showcase during May 2011:
BP: http://www.baseballwebtv.com/Video.aspx?videoID=52058
Catching drill: http://www.baseballwebtv.com/Video.aspx?videoID=52059
Carlos Valdez: signed out of the Dom. Prospect League for $350K in July 2011. He has yet to make his pro debut, but he won’t turn 18 until the end of June 2012. He brings 3 above-average tools to the field right now (speed, arm & power), and has the potential to add the other 2 tools (defense & hit) in the future. He’ll probably end up playing in the DSL during 2012, but he could surprise and jump all the way to the AZL with a strong showing in the spring. He’s already gotten a visa and played in the States as part of the DPL All-Star team that toured Florida and AZ when the pros had spring training back in March 2011. Here’s a video collage of Valdez in training:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GVUeGF0dIE
Christian Diaz : he’s a young (turns 19 on July 15th), toolsy and athletic RF from Puerto Rico with 4 potential plus tools (defense, arm, hitting, power) that the Giants drafted in the 11th round of this year’s draft. He has an ideal and projectable frame - long and lean with long arms and legs, sloping shoulders, and a high waist with plenty of room to fill out and put on muscle over the next several years. Scouts like his raw bat speed, short swing, and ability to hit to the opposite field. He got in 10 games and 16 PAs in the AZL this summer and showed some promising flashes. Here’s a short vid of him taking BP back in January 2011:
http://www.baseballwebtv.com/Video.aspx?videoID=50666
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 3, 2026 7:50 PM EST reply actions
I guess it is safe to say that Rafael Rodriguez is no longer considered a prospect
at age 19. what a shame.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 4, 2026 10:26 AM EST reply actions
Never say never for a guy that young, but his prospect status is highly tarnished. At some point you have to show that your tools translate to prodution on the baseball field. I also believe that the original evaluation of RR’s tools and athleticism were greatly inflated at the time he was signed. Thankfully, after RR’s signing the Giants re-thought their strategy in the Caribbean FA market. RR was their last big $$$, big-hype signing. Since then they’ve described the market as overbought and proceeded to sign 10+ prospects a year for between $10K and $400K rather than 1 or 2 guys for $1.5M to $2.5M each.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 4, 2026 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
RafRod and the Legend of Chuckie Jones are born within 2 weeks of each other. I know you’re high on Chuckie, but I’d say both these players are in similar holding patterns until they prove out. I wouldn’t give up on either, but I think Chuckie is much more in the same boat as RafRod than where you’re rating him.
I second that spread the money strategy being a better bet in the Caribbean.
by shankbone on Jan 4, 2026 1:17 PM EST up reply actions
The difference being that Chuckie is way more athletic than RR - and he shows it on the playing field - and Chuckie has way more raw power and in-game power than RR. That’s huge when comparing 2 corner OFs.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 4, 2026 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Stocks Took Big Hits
But I think Jones and RafRod still have potential. Maybe not big-time “A” prospect potential, but I still think they could bounce back as C+/B- prospects with good years. I think they got a lot going against them, and I think RafRod has to show a lot this year if we want to take him more seriously again, but I wouldn’t throw in the towel just yet on a couple of guys who are so young.
Optioned to Fresno
A San Francisco Giants Minor League Blog
by objesguy on Jan 25, 2026 2:39 PM EST up reply actions
One note
The Giants did spend big money after RafRod, on someone named Luis Angel Mateo, but there was some problem (don’t recall but probably the usual, age and/or physical) which allowed the Giants to pull the contract.
So it could have been this deal that caused them to re-think their strategy.
I would also note that John Barr took over international scouting around that time too, so perhaps he was the trigger to avoid the big spending there.
In any case, the history of spending big money in the international market is littered with failed prospects for the most part (going by BA’s top bonuses list for international signings). So it would make sense to not do that anymore.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
They only gave Mateo $650K back in July of 2008, but that was voided when he failed his physical (seems fortuitous as he hasn’t really been heard from since), so I think that fits my comment.
The one signing that does contradict my point was Duanel Jones for a reported $1.3M back in Dec. 2009. That deal was also voided when Jones tested positive for PEDs during his team physical and MLB suspended him for 50 games. Jones subsequently signed with the Padres for a reported $900K. Jones had decent numbers in 36 games in the AZ Rookie league in 2011 (as an 18 year old), and earned a promo to the NWL - where he laid an egg in only 18 games and 68 ABs.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
by Fla-Giant on Jan 4, 2026 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry, my memory had them giving him more
So strike that. In any case, I agree that something changed fro the Giants, at some point, where they stopped spending the big money. So perhaps my suggestion that John Barr being appointed could have been the triggering event might be valid then.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 8, 2026 6:53 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, never say never
And I agree that his numbers were not that great in 2011.
But not horrible either considering that he is 4 years younger and thus at least 4 years less experienced than the players in the league. His strikeout rate was under 20% per AB, and he walked at an OK rate, again considering age vs. competition. Despite his youth, his strikeout rate was still better than league average, his contact rate was 81% vs. 77% league average. And his BABIP of .285 is much lower than the .314 league average BABIP, so he might have had some bad luck there or some development yet to achieve. And Sandoval’s power didn’t kick in until he turned 22, and RafRod was 4 years from that last season.
Adoptive parental unit of Ehire Adrianza.
Godfather of Travis Ishikawa.
"We deserve this" Sabean
"Not here to make friends, I'm here to win games" - Bruce Bochy
Q: "This doesn't happen every year." Posey: "Why not?"
"Do it again Baby!" Huff
"Let's get back to work and make another run at it" Posey
2010's will be known as "Decade of the Giants"
by obsessivegiantscompulsive on Jan 4, 2026 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
Strength Up The Middle
Just about every prospect named plays an up the middle defensive position. A very nice proposition for an organization.
Appreciate the talent Barr & Co have assembled at the catching position (Posey/Sanchez/Joseph/Susac). Even though each player has a question or two the surplus allows the organization plenty of options. As Fla-Giant stated above, the Giants can possibly parlay the riches to further improve the club.
I do question if the Giants have enough quality front of the rotation talent in the minors. I do like Seth Rosin and Josh Olsich and believe they can be middle of rotation.
Is Brandon Crawford the answer at SS? Dunno but I do like Ehire Adrianza a lot.
How much more development time does the organization give Chris Dominguez before they move him to the mound?
by wilriv21 on Jan 7, 2026 2:36 PM EST reply actions

by John Sickels on 














