Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: SB Nation Bloggers College Football Bowl Picks And Schedule

Grade Disagreements

Discussion Question: What grades from the 2010 book that I have given so far do you most disagree with, and why?

0 recs  |  Comment 137 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Josh Bell should be a B+

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 20, 2025 12:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

He is now an above averega defender at third

He gets on base, works the count, has above average power, could hit for average, has shown great work ethic and wants to improve.

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 20, 2025 12:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Anyone else agree with me on Bell?

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 21, 2025 12:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he's very well rounded.

Could be a top 30/35 guy right now.

Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.

by Frederick0220 on Dec 21, 2025 12:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have to agree with this.

He gains value by position as well. If he’s an above average defender likely to stick there, I’m all for Bell getting the B+

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 21, 2025 9:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Josh Bell can not hit lefties.... At all. B-

I hear what has been said about Bell & well I have to disagree. Look the guy hits righties at a very good rate, one that if he were simply a lefty batter he’d be a high B+ prospect, but he’s a switch hitter who shouldn’t be. The O’s are so impressed with him that they signed Garrett Atkins to a 1 year deal with a club option. Not only does Bell not him well for average against lefties, but he’s also got no pop either.
I’d compare Bell more to that of a Casey Blake. I’d grade him a high B- at best until he can show that he can hit lefties to at least a moderate clip.

by cyder7830 on Dec 22, 2025 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I only give Bell a B right now…..

I'd rather have Nick Punto playing 3B and Felipe Lopez playing 2B

than Punto playing 2B and Kouzy, Crede, DeRosa or Glaus playing 3B.

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Dec 23, 2025 1:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Alderson at B-

Seems a bit high to me.

by jar75 on Dec 20, 2025 12:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

+1

by gogotabata on Dec 20, 2025 12:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Living on past (undeserved) hype

by alskor on Dec 20, 2025 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm a HUGE believer in Alderson

Yeah he had a bad season at 2009, so he definitely drops from the B+ last year(a little high), but much of the issue was a drop of velocity, and I truly believe that this will return, and I actually think it will go up. Alderson is still growing into his frame. He’s 6’6/6’7 (depending who you ask), and I think once he learns to use this, he’s could be a good #2/3 pitcher, for quite a while. And remember he’s still only 21.

I think a B- is a good grade.

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Dec 20, 2025 3:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+ a lot

he’s borderline C+ to me

by daveh33 on Dec 20, 2025 4:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 C+ to me

The loss of velocity is a major concern

by Calvn n Hobbs on Dec 20, 2025 5:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Marrero & d'Arnaud

Maybe they’re just opposite ends of the spectrum as far as how I like them personally, but I’d bump d’Arnaud up to a B- and bump Marrero down to a B-.

I can see some reservation with d’Arnaud given that he’s a college bat that hasn’t played above High-A yet; but scouting reports from Arizona were good, he sounds like a legit shortstop (not a Jason Donald type), and I think the statistical profile is good.

Marrero, I’m just not a huge fan of. I know the raw ability is still there, but under the “First basemen really have to mash” school of thought, he’s now 21 and has really yet to do that. If he were at a more premium defensive position, I could see a straight B, but at first base, I think of him more as a B-, maybe even borderline C+ guy.

by PhillyFriar on Dec 20, 2025 12:15 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

SP David Bromberg should probably go from C+ to B-

Also speaking of the Twins

C Wilson Ramos should be a B not a B- IMHO.

Rene Tosoni is good.

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Dec 20, 2025 12:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

As far as why I think Bromberg should be a B- is that he led the MWL in 2008 in K’s
and the FSL in 2009 in K’s that in itself should speak volumes. Also this last year David maintained about a 2.5 to 1 K to BB ratio while holding the opposition to a .224 BA against.

Wilson Ramos is the scariest hitter in the Venezuelan Winter League right Now playing for the Tigres de Aragua … and he is one of the younger players, with the likes of Gregor Blanco, Luis Valbuena also in that league - Ramos dominating in the way that he is says something to me + his Defense is outstanding.
I think health is the key for Wilson and that may be largely why he got a B- over a B in the first place.

Rene Tosoni is good.

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Dec 20, 2025 12:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1 on Ramos

"I couldn't do that. Could you do that? Why can they do it? Who are those guys?"

by maxisagod on Dec 20, 2025 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jaff Decker - B+

He has a bad body. His production, given league and age, is probably at an A- level. He destroyed the MWL as a 19 year old - I think he deserves the bump.

by seabass on Dec 20, 2025 12:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If prospecting was all about age and production...

you could pretty much do it with a spreadsheet.

Especially at the lower levels, there’s a lot more than production to look at.

by PissedMick on Dec 20, 2025 1:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, but John said it himself

Decker is much more athletic than he is given credit for. He should get the A-.

by RedSoxFaithful on Dec 20, 2025 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

I love Decker as well, but A- is a little high. I wouldn’t be surprised if he gets the A- after he explodes again in 2010.

I do think he deserves a B+ over the B though.

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Dec 20, 2025 3:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His bat isnt that sure a thing that he's anywhere close to an A- for me

I like him as a B, but I dont really have any strong objections if he was given a B+. Im more concerned about his athleticism than John.

by alskor on Dec 20, 2025 3:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t get why everyone is down on Decker as if he has zero chance to be an average OF’er. I’ve read just as many analysts who thinks he can not only hold his own in LF but some think he could handle RF. It’s surprising to me that today people would see his body and jump to conclusions despite the results we see in the stats.

by jfish26101 on Dec 20, 2025 2:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It doesn’t mean he can handle CF or that he will be above average defensively in a corner but it does sort of argue against him having zero athleticism and negative value in the OF. He probably will age poorly but I don’t see anything that says he can’t be an average OF’er at least short term. Factor in the bat and I think he is a very good looking position prospect. A- may be to high but I think it’s defensible.

by jfish26101 on Dec 20, 2025 3:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Decker is a fascinating test case - how do we read him, projection-wise, in terms of physique and athleticism? It seems that is the difference b/w giving him an A or B+ or even B. I would give him a B+; he looks like Matt Stairs coming up in an era that knows what to do w/ a Stairs (as opposed to the Hamster toiling in the minors for too long).

What do I see in my imaginary crystal ball? Best case scenario: a couple of all-star type seasons, a lot of average to slightly above average seasons w/ just below average defense in RF or LF, and a long last act (a la Stairs) as a bat for hire. Worst case scenario is I guess Jack Cust w/ less power and a little more average.

What I’d love to hear is a summary/report from someone who has been following him in person for awhile; how athletic does he play? Has his physique changed in the last year? What is his bat speed like? etc

by gogotabata on Dec 20, 2025 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His worst-case is worse than Jack Cust.

I love Jaff Decker, but you would be delusional to tab a player’s floor as an .829 OPS Major Leaguer.

His floor, like most, is a career minor league player.

There are no guarantees in this glorious realm.

Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.

by Frederick0220 on Dec 21, 2025 12:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jack Cust w/ less power

and who bounces around in the minors from organization to organization for five to six years before getting a regular gig for a couple of years . . . of course, Decker could suddenly just bottom out, but I think he’s realistically a major league hitter

by gogotabata on Dec 21, 2025 6:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well Cust seemingly has lost his power so I don’t think Cust with more defensive value and a higher BA is that bad of a comp either. Sure it isn’t his floor but next to nobody has a floor that high if you are nitpicking, not even guys like Heyward or Montero.

by jfish26101 on Dec 21, 2025 9:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One year does not make for a trend

http://twitter.com/FutureSox

by The Big Hurt on Dec 21, 2025 6:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure

But production should outweigh what he looks like in the uniform. I haven’t heard any questions of his makeup or work ethic, he’s just a naturally big kid. I read after he had his back injury, people in the Padres organization said he recommitted himself to his conditioning. I’m not saying that his body isn’t of any concern at all, but his advanced approach at the plate, along with the power he’s shown are incredibly impressive for a 19 year old. I’ve never read anything that says he won’t be able to play in the OF, and he certainly has the arm for RF if he doesn’t slow down too much.

I think you can make the case for him being an A-. At most, his body concerns should knock him down to a B+. A straight B for that kind of production doesn’t make sense to me.

by seabass on Dec 20, 2025 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Brad Lincoln is not a C+ prospect by any means, particularly with Alderson’s grade. At WORST he’s equal, and it would take some difficult glasses to determine that they’re equal. I’d have Alderson as a C+ and Lincoln as a B-.

by WrenFGun on Dec 20, 2025 12:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think Lincoln is a B

Good stuff throughout the year, showing that he’s bouncing back from TJ surgery. His AAA line wasn’t that bad: 3.89 FIP, 6 k per 9, 1.5 walks per 9; AA: 3.15 FIP, 7.7 k rate, 2.1 walk rate.

His curveball was pretty nasty, and even if he tired by the end of the year, he has done plenty, plenty, plenty to set himself apart from the random collection of arms that are C+ quality. I can’t think of anyone who would trade Lincoln for Alderson; Lincoln has better stuff, is closer to the bigs, has a higher ceiling and a higher floor.

Alderson’s cumulative FIP last year: 4.29. Lincoln’s: 3.48.

So, you can’t even say that Alderson outperformed Lincoln in 09. Just puzzling . . .

by gogotabata on Dec 20, 2025 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

In the Pirates top 20 I commented that Lincoln should be bumped to a B- but the more I’ve thought about it I think he should be a straight B. He’s recovered from the TJ surgery, he pitched well in AAA, and he has a fairly high floor. I haven’t made a top 100 list yet, but I’m sure Lincoln would be on there, maybe near the top 50 even.

RIP Nick Adenhart

by gatling on Dec 20, 2025 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

http://www.baseballstothewall.com/2009/12/16/brad-lincoln-top-100-prospect-or-failed-top-pick/

..My write-up on the matter. Seeing the grade really struck me the wrong way.

by WrenFGun on Dec 20, 2025 2:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with the straight B

I’d put Lincoln on the fringes of a top 50.

He should be a B- at worst, and that’s only primarily because of age. His post-TJ body of work is strong and is indicative of a full /near-full recovery.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 21, 2025 9:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually

His age doesn’t bother me much. What does bother me ALOT is the 2007 season. You just can’t ignore that. Unless you want to blow his arm out again, he won’t be able to pitch 200 innings for at least another 2 years. And that still might not be enough to keep him from harm.

BTW, were his AAA stats really that impressive? The only number that was really good was his walk rate. A high LD% makes his BABIP a tad low most likely. Gives up too many fly balls too. I’ll wait another year or two to see a longer track record of record of health before I put him in the top 50 or give him a B+.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

by WayneCampbell08 on Dec 22, 2025 12:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think a B+ is too high, Wayne. As I speculated in my post, I wouldn’t be surprised if he was actually in the zone too much at AAA, explaining for the drop in K’s and walks. I wouldn’t put much stock in opponents LD%, though. I’d like to see another year of data before assuming he’s officially a flyball pitcher after having some decent GB numbers in the past.

By the time he’s a full-time starter in the majors (hopefully by the start of 2011) he’ll be three full seasons removed from Tommy John. I see no reason to think he won’t be able to handle an adequate work load at that number.

by WrenFGun on Dec 22, 2025 12:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+2

Lincoln is easily a B, if not B+

by rukiddingme on Dec 21, 2025 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Still don't think Alvarez should be a straight A

You’re name has 2k9 in it — what are you some 8 year-old who makes Pillsbury Doughboy cookies and jerks off to that bullshit video game with Tim Lincecum on the cover--
Frederick0220

by Mets2k9 on Dec 20, 2025 2:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

why?

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 20, 2025 2:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I Do

.

by Havok1517 on Dec 20, 2025 2:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

cool

You’re name has 2k9 in it — what are you some 8 year-old who makes Pillsbury Doughboy cookies and jerks off to that bullshit video game with Tim Lincecum on the cover--
Frederick0220

by Mets2k9 on Dec 20, 2025 2:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

same

he is far from a sure thing

by daveh33 on Dec 20, 2025 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But Dom Brown is? :D

by jfish26101 on Dec 20, 2025 6:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

did i say dom brown deserved an A?

no, they’re both A-

but yeah, I would take D Brown over Alvarez any day of the week if thats what you wanted to get out of me

by daveh33 on Dec 20, 2025 6:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

really Dom Brown over Pedro Alvarez any day of the week?

hmm

Rene Tosoni is good.

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Dec 20, 2025 7:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

i don’t why this would be shocking, i’ve rated him higher on every list i’ve made.

by daveh33 on Dec 20, 2025 8:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think it’s shocking, per se, but I do think it runs contrary to the consensus.

by PhillyFriar on Dec 20, 2025 8:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You can have him...

I still think he busts. Alavarez on the other hand could be a special middle of the order hitter. Some have said Ryan Howard, Jim Thome, David Ortiz, and Manny Sanguillen even called him the next Willie Stargell. He has an MVP caliber bat and he will likely stick at third for at least a couple years. I don’t know many players that I would take over him. Maybe Heyward and Matusz but no other prospect. He has a very special bat.

by joegonzo on Dec 21, 2025 6:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I still think he busts.

A pretty strong assertion there. any specific reason why?

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 21, 2025 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, PVez's defense does it for me.

If he moves to 1B, he’s not projected that much better with the bat than guys like Chris Carter and Brett Wallace, and neither of those guys should be getting straight As.

The defense knocks him down to A-.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 21, 2025 9:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because ...

I don’t want to fall into a Gookie Dawkins trap. Alvarez was pedestrian at A+, very good at AA.

I don’t understand Alvarez’s 2009 line.

An “A” guy should have no questions.

"Most overrated prospect in the minors." -- Bravesin07 on Madison Bumgarner

by criminal type on Dec 20, 2025 2:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Exactly my thinking

You’re name has 2k9 in it — what are you some 8 year-old who makes Pillsbury Doughboy cookies and jerks off to that bullshit video game with Tim Lincecum on the cover--
Frederick0220

by Mets2k9 on Dec 20, 2025 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure if it actually changes your opinion...

…but for those concerned about the work ethic after he showed up out of shape last season, this should be encouraging…

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09354/1022322-63.stm?cmpid=pirates.xml

by jseiner on Dec 20, 2025 3:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Alavrez tears the cover off the ball...

at AA and he doesn’t deserve a A. He is more than likely a top 5 prospect.

by joegonzo on Dec 20, 2025 6:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A couple:

I really thought Domonic Brown would be getting an A-, I think he’s going to be special.

James Darnell, I thought he’d get a B+, I can’t really find many things I don’t like.

Drew Storen, I thought he’d be a B, not B+

Ian Desmond, I thought he’d be a B-, not C+

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Dec 20, 2025 3:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Think I agree on Brown

Also, I know its been mentioned plenty in the Sox thread, but Lin probably needs a bump.

by alskor on Dec 20, 2025 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Storen

Are they still trying to move him to the rotation (they should!) ? He’s arguably one of the very, very few relief prospects I’d go B+ for. He’s easily the best stud relief prospect in all MLB IMO. But, obviously, relievers <<<<< starters. However, he’s immediately dominated competition. I’m willing to go B+ for him,

Desmond’s got position going for him and I agree with the B- for him.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 21, 2025 9:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 21, 2025 10:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There is NO move to rotation

for Storen.

He also had an episode in AFL where he melted after an error. Storen’s stats mirror Zech Zinicola after his 1st year, let’s see how he does his 2nd year, hopefully it’s not Zechory-ly - so I’d say B at max.

by VladiHondo on Dec 22, 2025 2:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ben Revere - B?

Too high for me. He’s a C+ until he learns how to take a BB, since it’s looks pretty obvious that the power’s not there.

ProspectTube.com

You Video. You Scout.

by ProspectTube.com on Dec 20, 2025 6:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Learn to walk?

Revere walks more than he strikes out…. he doesn’t need to learn to walk. Yes, some guys with his walk rate need to learn to walk. Those guys are striking out 100+ times a year also. Guys who walk more than they strike out don’t need to learn to walk at all. If he keeps his skillset he is a .300 hitter every year with 30+ steals and probably a .350 OBP. A center fielder who can do that is every bit of a B prospect.

by dougdirt on Dec 21, 2025 5:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

by PhillyFriar on Dec 21, 2025 5:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Below AVG walk rate

Revere actually is below avg when it comes to taking free passes, hence, my BB statement. Unless he’s the next Ichiro, and there looks to be about one of those guys, there’s no way he can sustain those monster babip numbers as he moves up. With absolutely zero power, there’s no reason for guys to pitch around him in the upper levels.

300/350/30SB guy is definitely valuable. I just don’t buy the .300/350 part.

ProspectTube.com

You Video. You Scout.

by ProspectTube.com on Dec 21, 2025 5:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Math

Lets say he walks/strikes out 40 times over 600 PA in a season and has 3 HR with 5 HBP, 2SF and 2 SH then he would need a .317 BABIP to hit .300/.350 (AVG/OBP). For someone with his speed its very possible that he can do that until he is 30.

by dougdirt on Dec 21, 2025 5:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

.317 is certainly reasonable. The 40/40 line feels light to me though. To me, the 08 Ellsbury line (less 20 SB’s) is a good Revere comp. Is that a B in your mind?

ProspectTube.com

You Video. You Scout.

by ProspectTube.com on Dec 21, 2025 6:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His speed...

could keep his BABIP well over .317 for most of his career. A guy who walks and strikes out the same amount of times and who will steal 30+ bases while hitting for a high average is a very valuable player. That is more Ichiro-lite which I would take anyday from my CF. He could be much more than a B prospect, but I think a B is about right.

by joegonzo on Dec 21, 2025 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

That would be a B for me out of a center fielder with good defense. Of course I think Revere will strike out less, thus having a higher average than Ellsbury’s .280 that year, and more OBP.

by dougdirt on Dec 21, 2025 8:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

defense...

Is something I haven’t completely thought about here. In reading reports, it sounds like he has a chance to be plus, which obviously would help his status greatly.

I too think he’ll strike out less than Ellsbury, but also walk less. I’m just hesitant to drop a B on any player with 20 power (yes, hyperbole, but probably not too far off). 3 HR’s in 1100 plate appearances. He’s listed at 5’9 165, so I’m not sure there’s any room to grow here. Also, 17 caught stealing in 63 attempts last year. It may sound like nit-picking, but when you’re completely void of one tool (power), you really need to excel in all other areas to be considered a B in my mind. Then again, maybe I grade on a different scale.

ProspectTube.com

You Video. You Scout.

by ProspectTube.com on Dec 22, 2025 12:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

The difference is that Ellsbury maintained his power each step up the ladder. Revere is trending downwards. He had Juan Pierre-esque power numbers this year. That has got to scare you a bit. If he doesn’t start hitting the ball with authority, the pitching at higher levels will expose him.

I reject your reality and substitute my own.

by WayneCampbell08 on Dec 22, 2025 1:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

We’re on the same page here, and not sure if Juan Pierre is much more than a 4th OF type with most teams.

ProspectTube.com

You Video. You Scout.

by ProspectTube.com on Dec 22, 2025 12:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Power

Revere certainly won’t have the power that Ellsbury has. I never said he would. But I don’t think the pitching will expose him because of the power because the guy just doesn’t swing and miss the baseball. He is going to be Juan Pierre like at the plate, falling into that .720-.750 OPS range that is built mostly on a .300 average. I think his defense overall can be better than that of Pierre though who throws like my grandma and brings down his overall defensive value. Lets not forget that Pierre has been a player with these WAR numbers since making a full season debut:
4.3, 3.6, 1.7, 2.9, 1.7, 0.1 and 1.8. Outside of 2008, Pierre has been a center fielder that has helped his team every year. If Pierre is his comp, then I would say being a 2 win player on average for 7 straight years is most certainly a B prospect.

by dougdirt on Dec 22, 2025 2:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes...

But the reviews on his defense havent been positive recently - though he does have all the tools to be a good defender.

by alskor on Dec 22, 2025 12:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Che-Hsuan Lin - not sure it's a grade disagreement

since I don’t know what grade you actually gave him, but I do think you have underrated him by a bit. Young, still has some projection left, going to AA, still a plus defensive player. Had a solid overall year, with very good adjusted lines. Sure, they can only take you so far, but it is something to consider. Outside of his slow first month (which I believe had to with an injury but I don’t recall right now) where his discipline was out of whack, he had a fairly solid rest of the year. Oh, strong plate discipline, good speed. Some natural power should happen, but that’s about his only negative. I don’t see how he falls that far behind Reymond Fuentes and some others that were ranked ahead. To be honest, I think there’s a better case for Lin for a B- than there is for some of the guys you’ve given it to so far, although I could see C+.

by toonsterwu on Dec 20, 2025 6:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Lin = So Taguchi?

I’ll admit I was very high on Lin but after watching some video and reviewing some scouting reports I’m not sold anymore. I do like Lin some don’t get me wrong it’s just he’s got that 4th OF feel to him ending up as a defensive replacement or PR.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 20, 2025 7:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's an odd comparison

So Taguchi was never a great defensive player. Even if he fails to be more than a luck dependent player, the plus defensive ability and discipline should mean a very useful player.

by toonsterwu on Dec 20, 2025 7:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

So Taguchi might not be as good defensivley as LIn but he is good defensivley. Not sure where you are getting your info.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 20, 2025 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Taguchi

For his career, he was average to slightly above average in CF. Maybe if I had seen him when he was younger … but I don’t think he was a plus defender in CF. Lin could be …

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 1:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

okay

I see that there are some things that, in his younger, he was a plus option in CF. I admittedly never saw him play in Japan before, so I was only speaking to what he did stateside. I know the next argument is likely to be a good UZR/150 overall score for him but the sample was relatively limited overall (1276 innings) and it’s limited because his max innings in CF for a season was 380.1 (in 2007). I simply don’t believe that the So Taguchi I saw in the US was a plus defensive CF, but then again, maybe I’ve forgotten something.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 2:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

according to UZR...

Taguchi was 6 runs better than the average center fielder over his 1200+ innings there.

So, he was pretty much a dead-on league average CF while he was in the states.

by PissedMick on Dec 21, 2025 5:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Taguchi comparisons are from soxprospects.com. If you look at his comps though they are more based of nationality or size rather than stuff or skill set.

by Pelferized on Dec 22, 2025 6:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

put it tihs way

since it seems like you are a Cubs fan as well, he’s basically what Hak-ju Lee would be if Lee moved to CF. Sure, being at SS gives Lee more value, but Lin will be a full 2 levels ahead of him to start 2010.

by toonsterwu on Dec 20, 2025 7:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

????

Uhhh not real sure what your point is here. Sure he’ll be 2 full levels ahead but Lee is over 2 years younger so what exactly is your point? BTW that is a horrible comparison. Lee’s ceiling is much higher at this point and it does matter that he plays SS it is different. That’s like saying James Loney would be equal value as Mauer pre-2009 if only he played C. Just dosen’t make much sense imho.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 20, 2025 10:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Huh

Lee’s ceiling is much higher? I’m as big a Cubs fan and Cubs system follower as the next guy … but no way I buy that. Like Lin, Lee would have to tremendously rework his swing to generate more than gap power, despite the fact that both have the physical potential to have more power. I believe, having seen both, that Lin will have more natural power, but that’s definitely debatable, particularly because I’m projecting based on comments in regards to how Lee’s body will mature. Both are fast - I think Lin will end up faster than Lee at similar ages as both mature, but again, it’s a wash, as it’s still guesswork on how Lee’s body will physically mature. Both are very disciplined - Lin with a slight advantage right now, but that could balance out as Lee matures a bit. Having seen both, I think raw arm strength favors Lin, but that’s also hard to assess from the different spots they play right now.

I thought it was fairly obvious why I was comparing the two, but the reason I compared them is because they have very similar physical and offensive profiles, along with the fact that Lee may end up in CF (if Castro sticks at short). None of this should be taken as a knock of Lee. As a Cubs fan, I am superbly excited about his potential, and maybe I show Cubs bias some of the times here, but I simply don’t see how there is a case for Lee’s potential to be “much higher”. Yes, he deserves points for being able to play short (keep in mind that while most believe he will stick at short and be a good defender if he has that opportunity, it isn’t certain. There’s definitely some ironing out, but we have to see, again, how he physically matures, how he adapts to American food (I point this out because some prospects from Asia have put on a lot more weight after coming stateside), and well, he has good, but not plus arm strength). Lee’s ability to stick at short is more rooted in his speed/quickness right now, and hence why it is important to watch how he fills out.

I’m not suggesting Lin should be a higher grade than Lee. Being a shortstop has added value. Barring a surprise, Lee should be a B/B- grade. He posted nice slash lines (.330/.399/.420 - that said, his adjusted slash lines were .277/.352/.364.) The reason I pointed out age and level is because I believe that being on the same age track and succeeding at a higher level should mean something. A guy succeeding in shortseason isn’t destined to succeed at A+. Said player isn’t destined to be a similar player at A+. A lot can happen, and Lee, by most early indications, will be “slowplayed” a bit more than Castro was. Furthermore, Lin had a solid year. Take a look at his adjusted slash lines (.319/.402/.438). I’m not asking people to buy into the adjusted slash lines of Lin as a sign of what he can do (because adjusted slash lines can only take you so far) but rather, as a sign of potential. There’s a reason why Che-Hsuan Lin still cracked a LOADED BA Carolina League Top 20 (considering the size of the league and the guys that passed through there this year, there was loads of talent). There’s a reason why KG (I think) wrote that the Red Sox are still very high on Lin (suggesting that they were higher on him moreso than he was … I believe it was KG … could be another evaluator, though, and I’m a bit too lazy to try and go search for the quote right now).

Again, to sum up, very similar offensive profiles and physical profiles. Unless John surprises with a lower than expected grade for Lee (that is, below a B/B-), I simply don’t see the huge gap (John gave Lin a C - didn’t realize that when I typed my initial post, but took a look at his wording again) between the two. I understand everyone grades differently, and I respect the work John does. He did ask for grade disagreements, though. Moreover, I really don’t see how guys like Reymond Fuentes/Derrik Gibson and some more deserve to be ranked ahead of Lin at this point. They may end up better, but I just don’t see how they deserve to be ranked ahead at this point (and in Fuentes case, significantly ahead if the B- holds), unless it’s in a SNTS/BA-esque way. It feels like we’re trying to find faults of Lin’s to pick, He does everything well except power, and this isn’t in a Sam Fuld/Brett Gardner/Reggie Willits type talent, as there’s much more ability, and potential, than those types of guys.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 2:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Couple Things.

1st I never said Taguchi was a plus defender nor did I saw he was as good defensivley as Lin. All of Taguchi’s ML value has come as a defensive replacement and PH. I was comparing Lin to that type profle as a player. I do like Lin don’t get me wrong.

2nd you put an awfull lot weight into slash adjusted lines. I look at them but I see you throw them around a lot. They have some value I just don’t buy into them like gospel.

3rd. Lin has a huge leg kick which will need to be worked out to reach any power potential. Tinkering w/ a guys swing in some cases will ruin what a guy had working for him in the 1st place. So while he might add power I’m a little bit more skeptical. His leg kick seems to be his trigger and messing around w/ that could affect his contact ability. (but again this is all conjecture)

3rd and this is my pet peeve. I have never seen anything about Lee moving to CF. Where are you getting this? I mean just pulling this out of thin air because it sounds good dosen’t make it so. Taking into account what Adam Foster had to say about Castro combined w/ numerous scouting reports I’ve read it’s more likely that IF Castro fills out like many think and adds power it will be him moving off SS to 2B. BA also eludes to this in their 2013 projected Cubs line up w/ Lee at SS and Castro at 2B. I think ppl on this site jump the gun so often trying to say player X has 2 move from there current defensive position because of this that or the other thing. When the reality is this is what the minor leagues is for is to work on defensive problems, plate discipline, ETC.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 9:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Speed.

Lin is rated as having plus speed while Lee has current plus-plus speed. Plus-plus is special and Lee’s frame is slight and even when/if he fills out more I have hard time seeing him add enough weight to seriously slow him down. So i guess I’m not buying that Lin will end up faster.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 10:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

responding to this first

Lin has plus-plus speed according to many right now. Expectations are that Lee’s plus-plus speed will decline a bit as he physically matures.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 11:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This is getting old...

so this will be my last response and I’ll leave it as we disagree. According to BA in both ‘08 and ’09 Lin has plus speed. The only place I can find that says Lin has plus-plus speed is soxprospects.com which routinley overrates their players skills and ML comps. Also I just noticed that they themselves compare Lin to So Taguchi LOL (purley coincidence I assure you as I hadn’t noticed that till just now).

Furthermore Lee’s body type is not that of someone who is gonna add a lot of weight. Please show me something from a reputable source that says Lee is projected to add so much weight he will slow down considerably. Also note Lee’s arm was considered very strong before TJ surgery.

As far as you knocking him defensively BA’s ‘10 scouting report on him reads as follows "He gets to balls that a lot SS can’t reach, and has the actions, hands, and arm strength to make difficult plays"

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 12:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

*****

The last part si worded wrong you may not nessarily be knocking him defensivley but you question him and w/ that scouting report not sure how you can question him staying at SS.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 12:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ok

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

again

a) Where have I knocked him defensively? I have said repeatedly that I expect him to stick at short. I have repeatedly said that he projects to be better at short than Castro. I’ve said there here, at BCB, NSBB, TCR, name a Cubs site.

My point is that to rule out anything right now, and assume that it will stick that way, is a bit flawed. That was my point in the original (that a player in SS A ball might not be the same player in A+). What about BA’s report contradicts anything that I’ve said on his ability right now? I’m simply saying that to not look at all the outcomes is a bit flawed. He doesn’t have plus-arm strength from most accounts - I believe BA even acknowledged that somewhere. He’s projected to fill out by about 25 pounds (there is every expectation that he’ll be around 6’2" 200).

b) I have no idea what soxprospects is. I’m assuming that’s a prospect for Red Sox? Or is Red and White Sox?

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nvm, i googled Soxprospects.com

I think I used to visit there in my college days. Site looks much different what I remember.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

soxprospects.com

It’s not a bad site I just feel they overvalue players/tools as it’s obviously Red Sox biased. You can get some good info from the site.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

side comment:

I think all sites dedicated to a team’s prospects will have a tendency to overhype them. A few years back, I thought Jason Churchill overhyped the Mariners prospects a bit, but I think he’s been much better with that over the last 4-5 years.

Side comment 2: I’ll stick by the plus-plus speed comment, but it isn’t based from anything that is online, and it’s not really based from visual evidence either. One thing to note in all this, though, is that the difference in plus-plus speed and plus speed isn’t that much in terms of what we can see on a baseball field. Actually, it could be as simple as human error depending on whomever is timing it.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

WOW!!!!

“Side comment 2: I’ll stick by the plus-plus speed comment, but it isn’t based from anything that is online, and it’s not really based from visual evidence either. "

What is it based on then??? When I make an argument 1 way or the other I try to include scouting reports, informed articles from reputable sources, stats, or personal observations. You kinda shoot your own argument in the foot w/ this comment.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 2:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What I meant was that

it isn’t based on me seeing him and saying “hey he’s fast”. It’s based on a bit more than that. Basically, that it isn’t random observation that I’m basing it on.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 2:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

ugh this is dragging

i was at a few games this summer and met and chatted with some folks, and when they timed him, the numbers they had were on the plus-plus level. As noted above, human error has to be taken into consideration with any SSS of times, but the folks I met suggested that he had been timing that well all year long.

Anyhow, this has really gotten away from the original discussion on what grade he deserved, and since there’s a grade thread as well, I’ll stop and wait to see if John keeps it as a C or if he moves it to a C+.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 2:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

re:

a) Your comment was that they compared well because Taguchi was good defensively. My point is that Lin is supposed to be a plus defensive CF, which Taguchi never was, and hence why I don’t see the comparison.

b) Please read my comment before making a comment like that. It’s a bit annoying. I specifically note your complaint. I am not utilizing neutralized lines as anything more than an indicator on potential. I even highlighted it above. As you note at the end, the minors is to work on a player’s issues, so potential should always be factored in.

c) I have not suggested that Lin would have any more than gap power. So, I’m not sure what to respond to here. My comparison was that, after watching the two, this year, and in year’s past, that I think Lee and Lin will project to have similar levels of power.

d) Actually, this has been speculated upon by many this year, at games, and online. I believe the esteemed AzPhil over at TCR has speculated upon it in the past. Part of it is Castro, part of it is concerns on how he physically matures. As I also noted, though, here and elsewhere, I do think he can stick at short and be a potential plus defender there (I know I’ve said that one this site before), but to remove that possibility, when so much physical maturation will occur, when it has been speculated upon, is sort of a half-glass full type look for me. I’d like to take in the whole picture and assess all the possibilities. I’ll talk about the Castro bit below, but what needs to be noted is that it’s not natural athleticism that is a concern for me on either - it’s how each works to fix their issues.

None of this, though, changes anything I was saying above. Namely, that these two players have similar offensive and physical profiles and I’m hard pressed, even accounting for the additional positional value of Lee at shortstop (which I have acknowledged), to see one as a potential B/B- (as Lee is likely to be) and one as a flat C when both have similar offensive concerns but one has succeeded offensively at a higher level.

As for Castro, it seems to be a case where, so much love has led to some people giving strong critiques. It happens when guys jump quickly, and Castro is probably a tad overhyped right now. Like Lee, everything with Castro depends on how he physically matures. Best guesses I’ve heard suggest that he can add probably 10-15 more pounds without impacting his athleticism. Any more than that, and he might have a problem (sits around 170-180 right now). Castro has good lateral movement and a plus-plus arm. If he maintains his athleticism, I’m not concerned. If he maintains his athleticism, I’m more concerned about his sidearming than I am about his range. That said, if adds way too much weight, that’d be problematic. Last couple points is that, if Castro establishes himself, I find it unlikely that he will be forced off short. The Cubs are also rather high on his ability to stick there as well. Tbh, I think Lee will likely be used as a trade chip in the next season or two, but that’s just a random guess on my part.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nit picking but....

Castro’s arm isn’t plus-plus sorry. Lake rates as the systems strongest IF arm and he gets a 65 on the 20-80 scouting scale. nCastro has a strong no doubt but let’s not get carried away LOL.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 12:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jason Churchill has said

that he has a 70 arm. I’ve seen that thrown around elsewhere. Maybe other people picked up Churchill’s comments and ran with it. That said, plus-plus was probably overstating it. He does have a plus arm, though. As for Lake, for all his tools, he’s probably more Ronny Cedeno than Starlin Castro in attitude, from what I understand, and that may be his biggest issue.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am in no way...

making any comparison of Lake and Castro. My only point is that Castro dosen’t have a plus-plus arm.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

fair enough, although if Churchill is right, 70 would be plus-plus

the problem is, his side arming impacts his overall arm strength. There’s so much of Starlin that could actually be better - he would generate more arm speed if he threw more over the top, he would be more accurate if he threw more over the top, his footwork impacts him offensively (decent to solid natural speed but despite the SB’s, I don’t really think he’s a good baserunner yet) and defensively. It’s somewhat scary to think how good he could be if he actually ironed out all these issues, but at this stage, expecting him to rework his throwing motion is unlikely.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Castro

I like Castro and as a Cub fan I hope he excels for our sake. That said I think he’s a bit overrated at this point and will be very interested in seeing John’s grade of him

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 12:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's more overhyped than overrated

I think a fair case can be made for a B+ with Starlin, but I think he’s gotten so overhyped this offseason that it’s hard to really look at him without contemplating how overhyped he’s gotten. Now, I don’t really think he’s the top 25 prospect that Keith Law has said, so he might be overrated on some lists. I’ll be curious about John’s grade more because he was there at AFL and probably met with a lot of people that hyped up Castro.

At the end of the day, this is a guy who has had success, has good contact ability, has enough natural athleticism and lateral range, and has the potential to be have a bit more power with the bat. All this was true pre-AFL … but the Alfonso Soriano and current Hanley Ramirez comparisons made things a bit ridiculous. You never should expect that high a level for 99% of players (and even Hanley wasn’t projected to be as good as he has been the last few years). It’s a bit problematic for me that he’s reached AA and still has so much revolving around projection, but it’s balanaced against positive work ethic reports.

I mean, looking at that picture, I think there’s a decent case for B+. There’s a case for a B as well. The hype just makes it hard to really assess him anymore (and I’m guilty of that as well).

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This was...

too long to read so I will agree with both of you.

by joegonzo on Dec 21, 2025 7:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay, the Lee thing is dragging away from the Lin thing

I’m still rather surprised that Lin is a flat C. That just seems low to me.

by toonsterwu on Dec 21, 2025 12:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Poreda's C+ is way too low.

Yes, he’s very likely to end up being a reliever, but he still carried an FIP of 4 as predominantly a starter in his 2009 work in the minors (I’m completely ignoring the ~13 MLB IP).

I see him very likely to be a pretty good reliever, if the Padres don’t push him into the rotation (which I think they should), where I think he could survive as a BOR starter in Petco.

Dropping to C+ thanks to 32.2 AAA IP sounds rather confusing, to say the least.

I’d give him a B-, or even a straight B. He’s still fringe top 100 material to me IMO.

"I generally avoid temptation unless I can't resist it" ~ Mae West

by Blicks on Dec 21, 2025 9:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

-1

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 21, 2025 10:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Explain Yourself If You Want To Be Respected

My young cricket.

Hey guys, I run a music blog. alternative, powerpop, punk, electronica, screamo, etc etc, check it out. http://muzikdizcovery.blogspot.com/ artist interviews and many other stuff. free cookies! (not really, but still) :D

by cwhitman412 on Dec 21, 2025 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 11:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I Know Him Personally

I actually led him to this site.

Hey guys, I run a music blog. alternative, powerpop, punk, electronica, screamo, etc etc, check it out. http://muzikdizcovery.blogspot.com/ artist interviews and many other stuff. free cookies! (not really, but still) :D

by cwhitman412 on Dec 21, 2025 1:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Uhhh OK???

What is you point? I LOL because i felt you made a valid point not that i thought you or me had anyhting against the guy.

by cubsfan1 on Dec 21, 2025 1:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

There’s still a lot to like about his arm. No way guys with no velocity and no ceiling like Alderson should be higher than a guy with a great fastball and some work to do like Poreda.

by alskor on Dec 21, 2025 12:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

-1

Maybe he didn’t belong as a B last year? I don’t think he did. And why are you completely ignoring the fact that even if we exclude his MLB numbers he walked a HORRIFIC 75 batters in just over 100 innings this past season. That’s not “Dropping to C+ thanks to 32.2 AAA IP” as you say … that’s dropping to a C+ b/c he couldn’t throw strikes all season, at AA, AAA or the major league level.

by jayjay on Dec 21, 2025 1:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yet,

With the exception of 32 disastrous innings in one AAA stint, his FIP was consistently in the mid-3s. The reason is simple; though his control is at best okay last year, he strikes out a ton of batters, and gets a lots of ground balls so doesn’t give up many homers.

And with those terrible innings, he had an FIP of about 4.00 in AA, AAA and the majors at age 22. If that’s as bad as he can pitch, even when his control disappears, he looks like a pretty nice prospect to me. And if he remembers how to throw the ball over the plate like he did last season…

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 21, 2025 1:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His control collapsed after the trade

same thing happened with Carter and Russell, and Richard got worse too. I think it’s possible that them getting away from the coaches that fine-tuned their mechanics to that point made them regress. Poreda doesn’t have a second pitch as it is, so it’s quite possible he’ll end up a reliever.

by Daniel Berlyn on Dec 21, 2025 4:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FIP

He does not strike out a TON of batters. His FIP was so low b/c his HR/air rate was 1%, otherwise known as: an unrealistically low rate. Bring that up to a reasonable rate then tell me what his FIP would be … or let me save you the trouble, not all that impressive. And even if he did get his K rate up to a really, really high level what does that make his likely future … a LH Octavio Dotel at best? He’s not a B- prospect by any means in my mind.

by jayjay on Dec 21, 2025 8:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Kody Johnson

First of all, I think it is really splitting hairs to argue a "B-" should be a "B" or a "C+;" however, I do think leaving a guy with an 80 power totally off the radar screen is a mistake.

Yeah, I make fun of the guy by spelling his name with a "K," and I hated this draft pick by the Braves. AA pitching will eat him up this year, but the dude was 20 years old last year. That gives him a lot of time to get better. The stats might get ugly in 2010, but give him 2-3 years, which he has, and he might just straighten it out.

I recognize that this guy has tremendous bust potential and I personally do not think he is going to make it, but the fact is that most guys in the B-/C+ range are not going to make it in the Bigs. The thing is that if many of these guys do, they are just regulars, at best. Kody has the chance to be a true impact bat and I think that potential should be recognized.

He should be a Top 10 guy for the Braves and would be for most clubs.

by parish on Dec 21, 2025 10:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think Johnson is basically the definition of a C+ prospect. The problem with Johnson is by all accounts he’s a horrible defender and a meh athlete, which means all he has going for him is mammoth, plus plus plus, power. If he can’t make better contact he’s got nothing.

by WrenFGun on Dec 21, 2025 3:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Willie Ramos an A-

I’m not sure why he is not rated incredibly high at this point. Consider this:
1) He’s a catcher
2) He is an above average defender behind the plate
3) He hits for average and power

His only real downside is that he could stand to learn a bit more plate discipline. He’s absolutely destroying his winterball competition right now. I would think he should be the #1 prospect in the Twins organization for the time being.

by diehardtwinsfan on Dec 21, 2025 4:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

A-?

That would put him in the top 20 overall or so, there is just no way. B+ is about as high as I could see for him.

RIP Nick Adenhart

by gatling on Dec 21, 2025 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup.

I’m on board with the straight B John gave him.

3) He hits for average and power

Power: .153 career ISO, .137 ISO this year.

His only real downside is that he could stand to learn a bit more plate discipline.

He walked in 2.8% of his plate appearances this year — 2.8 percent! That’s a pretty significant downside if he doesn’t correct it — he’ll get incredibly exposed by major league pitching.

You’re just putting too much into what he’s done in winter ball. Sure, it’s a data point, but it doesn’t override what Ramos did in 2009, or what he did in the rest of his pro career. Not trying to pick holes in your favorite prospect, but let’s get real here.

by PhillyFriar on Dec 21, 2025 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Needs to walk more and 2.8% is nothing

www.oriolesprospects.com | twitter @orioleprospects

Order the 2010 OriolesProspects.com Handbook!

by ravensfan3 on Dec 21, 2025 8:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Its more like:

“his only real strength is he’s a good defensive catcher”

and

“his only real weaknesses are he could stand to be better at everything and he needs to drastically change his approach.”

by alskor on Dec 22, 2025 12:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ramos was injured for most of his 2009 season

I think that has to factor in a bit. It certainly explains his power drop in AA, and when you look at winterball, it has returned. He’s also has 21 walks (38ks) in 200 at bats down there too.

What he’s been doing rather well is that he’s cut down his strike out rate significatnly. He was 1/4.5 at bats in A ball, and dropped that to nearly 1/10 at bats in AA. It’s up slightly in the VWL, but not too much. I’ll go out on a limb and say he is priming himself for a monster year in AAA (baring injury of course).

I’ll stand by my original statement. He’s ranked low. You can split hairs on the B+/A- thing, but he has some serious potential and seems to be realizing it.

by diehardtwinsfan on Dec 22, 2025 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

except John gave him a B-

I think Ramos deserves a straight B

not a B-…

I'd rather have Nick Punto playing 3B and Felipe Lopez playing 2B

than Punto playing 2B and Kouzy, Crede, DeRosa or Glaus playing 3B.

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Dec 23, 2025 1:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no.

by daveh33 on Dec 21, 2025 5:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

closer to B- than A-

Decent bat, but strike zone judgment is pretty bad. Is the Latino A.J. Pierzynski really somebody you want to give an A- to?

by mrkupe on Dec 21, 2025 8:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Cody Johnson

I agree with most of what Parish has said. Not only is Cody Johnson young, but he has gotten consisently better.

He will probably struggle in AA, but then I expect him to survive and reach AAA in 2011. Yes, he has a chance to be an ‘impact bat’….

by Stephen in the UAE on Dec 22, 2025 7:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

He struck out in 40% of his ABs

He may have plus power, but he has very little else going for him. C is a good grade.

by jar75 on Dec 22, 2025 8:48 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Offseason Regrades

Recent FanPosts

Ranking B- Pitching Prospects (1st year players)
Picks For Your Team
Small
And the Seattle-Toronto pipeline continues...?
Small
OT: Your investment mistakes and successes
Small
Info on these players
Royalsretro_small
Should the Braves lock up Jason Heyward?
Small
Vazquez to the Yankees
Small
Winter Break 2009 Minor League Fantasy Draft
Small
Vitters v. Castro: Who's #1?
Small
How would you rank these outfielders?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

In Association With

MLB -- FanHouse

  • Gammons Ready for Next Chapter
  • Yankees Enhance Depth With Vazquez
  • Mariners Trade Brandon Morrow to Toronto for Brandon League
  • Javier Vazquez Returning to Yankees in Five-Player Deal

Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter