Not a Rookie: Micah Owings
Not a Rookie: Micah Owings
Micah Owings was a high-profile college player at Georgia Tech (2005) and Tulane (2006), being used as a starting pitcher at both schools but also spending time as an outfielder and first baseman due to his strong bat. He was a very good hitter; hitting .355 with 18 homers for Tulane in '06 for example. But most scouts preferred him as a pitcher. The Diamondbacks drafted him in the third round in '05, and he did well right away, posting a 2.45 ERA with a 30/4 K/BB in 22 innings for Lancaster in the Cal League after signing. His fastball was average at 88-92 MPH in college, but he threw 92-94 MPH when used in the bullpen for Lancaster. He had a good changeup and a promising, if erratic, slider. I gave him a Grade B- in the 2006 book, noting that I liked him quite a bit but that he would have more value if the slider developed enough that he could be used in the rotation.
Owings split 2006 between Double-A Tennessee and Triple-A Tucson, going a combined 16-2, 3.32 with a 130/51 K/BB ratio. His velocity settled into the 89-92 range. Interestingly, his slider improved while his changeup regressed a bit. But he held his own in Triple-A one year out of college. I gave him a Grade B in the book last year, thinking that he would need additional Triple-A time, but again I wrote that I liked him.
Owings made 27 starts for the Diamondbacks last year, going 8-8, 4.30 with a 106/50 K/BB in 153 innings, ERA+ of 109. I don't think it's a fluke. He was very effective in August and September (45/13 K/BB, 3.02 ERA in 10 starts, 60 innings). As his fans point out, he's a really good hitter, too, a career .333/.349/.683 hitter in the majors and .377/.381/.525 in the minors, though those numbers would deflate if he played every day.
So what does Owings offer for the future?
I see him as an inning-eater type who should maintain his current level of above-average performance, perhaps with improvement as he gains experience. He doesn't strike me as the type with a higher-than-average injury risk. I'd like to see his walk rate come down a little bit. It's not bad, but improved command would obviously help him a great deal, as I don't think we're going to see a huge velocity or dominance boost.
I could see him developing along a John Lackey path. Lackey had a good rookie year at age 23, was an average inning-eater at age 24 and 25 (ERA+ of 95 and 96 but throwing 200 innings a year) then started to take a step forward at age 26 (ERA+ of 123, 128, and 151 the last three seasons). If Owings can get through to age 26-27 without a major injury or diminution of stuff, I think he will have some really nice seasons in his late 20s.
Of course he could also tear his rotator cuff in spring training and fall by the wayside.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
I suspect
by Brickhaus on Feb 15, 2026 4:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Lackey also
He
by nms on Feb 15, 2026 4:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
re
by ScottAZ on Feb 15, 2026 4:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Better as a pitcher
by Mike Green on Feb 15, 2026 4:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
thank you Captain Obvious
No one is saying he is a true .333 hitter.
The point is he has shown considerable potential as a hitter despite not having worked on it seriously since college. Putting up a BABIP that high is very impressive to me, especially for someone who hasn't worked on hitting. BABIP is something hitters DO have control over, not a .463 degree maybe so that would come down, but it shows he might have a great ability to make hard contact.
But the bottom line is, saying what his BABIP is doesn't explain the situation at all.
If he was a full time hitter maybe he would retain his ability to hit the ball hard while making more consistent contact. Look at the numbers from ML pinch-hitters, its not easy to hit the ball when you are getting at-bats so irregularly. And Owings isn't working on his swing mechanics either or going over scouting reports on other pitchers.
I would personally keep Owings on the hill, but just explaining away the whole arguement w. 5 stupid letters is detrimental to positive discussion and the spread of ideas
by nms on Feb 16, 2026 11:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i had a take on owings:
http://variablesdont.blogspot.com/search/label/micah%20owings
for all intents and purposes, owings throws 1 pitch. he throws a 90 MPH version of a fastball that tends to dive in towards a RHB. he throws a 84 MPH version that tends to dive in towards a RHB. owings also throws a 77 MPH version that tends to dive in towards a RHB...
i'm not very high on owings going into 2008. his fastball is average, his slider lacks depth, and he doesn't appear to have confidence in his changeup. as a fourth or fifth starter, he could be a solid contributor, but i expect a significant regression for 2008, and i would not feel comfortable being any team that relies on owings to be a horse for them down the stretch.
by overlord on Feb 15, 2026 5:36 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Pretty hard to argue with your take
by shoewizard on Feb 15, 2026 8:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well ,um..
by casejud on Feb 16, 2026 4:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
its not hard to argue w that guys take
Owings fastball isn't average velo or life-wise and his secondary stuff has a lot more potential than you are giving him credit for
by nms on Feb 16, 2026 11:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
owings has a lot of value
his second half was the definition of a tease. i won't write him off completely, but in that time frame, when he threw 72 innings with a 3.7 ERA, he pitched twice at petco, he pitched against pittsburgh twice, against washington, san francisco, and st louis, each once. in those 7 games, which were either in very favorable run environments or against very weak lineups, he allowed 9 ER in 43.3 innings, for a 1.87 ERA.
again, he has a lot of value in real life, in simulation, in fantasy, but he's not that good of a SP.
by overlord on Feb 16, 2026 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you know
And rookies can IMPROVE, right?
A rookie closing with 43 innings of a sub-2 ERA is impressive. Even if those lineups were weak, those were still major league hitters.
Owings is a good pitcher, with good stuff and strong athleticism who has succeeded at every level.
It doesn't really help anything to throw up some numbers from his initial performance and put those forth as if that is all he is capable of.
There are plenty of reasons to think he has a bright future
by nms on Feb 16, 2026 2:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you are correct, but
by overlord on Feb 16, 2026 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...
In my opinion, he did what he was supposed to do, shut down bad offenses. It isn't like all of A-Rod's homers last year were against Beckett, Santana and Sabathia.
by drwmsu1 on Feb 16, 2026 2:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder.
Still though, the difference is pretty huge considering that most pitchers hit in the NEGATIVE OPS+....
I just wonder, can someone point out from a VORP / Winshare prospective how much that would add?
by RollingWave on Feb 15, 2026 11:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
is there...
I remember a very brief aside Baseball Between the Numbers, in the context of discussing Tim Hudson and Mark Mulder, that implied this, but it was about a sentence long, and they didn't really get into it.
by Mean Dean on Feb 16, 2026 6:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
you can't really isolate
by nms on Feb 17, 2026 1:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Like Him!!
His WHIP was especially impressive the second half, I think about 1.04 or very close to it---and to me thats the biggest indicator of pitching performace. I also have Hamels, Lincecum and Cain all at bargain prices on my team ( NL only keeper league),(also had Valverde, Bell and Broxton), so targeting and trading for Owings as my #4 starter means I will go into our auction draft not needing any other starting pitching this year---and that was my goal. I won last year and expect to repeat my succcess, carried again by my pitching staff---and I'm counting on Owings to be very helpful in that regard.
by bobbym on Feb 16, 2026 7:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs





