2011 MLB Draft: Baltimore Orioles Review
2011 MLB Draft: Baltimore Orioles Review
Big splash at the top with Dylan Bundy, followed mostly by conservative traditional college picks with a couple of high school signability gambles.
1) Dylan Bundy, RHP, Oklahoma HS: Throws very hard, has great secondary pitches, throws strikes, knows what he's doing. Can't find any fault with this pick.
2) Jason Esposito, 3B, Vanderbilt: Excellent glove at third, bat draws mixed reviews which kept him from going earlier. Plate discipline spotty. Hit .357/.423/.560 with 15 steals, 17 BB, 41 K.
3) Matt Wright, RHP, East Carolina: Sinker/slider/groundball type, needs to improve changeup to remain a starter but throws strikes. 2.79 ERA, 75/30 K/BB in 100 innings, just two homers.
4) Kyle Simon, RHP, Arizona: Like Wright, he keeps the ball down, throws strikes, and could develop into an inning-eater or a reliever. 2.72 ERA, 86/11 K/BB in 129 innings, just two homers.
5) Matt Taylor, LHP, Middle Georgia JC: Excellent stats with high strikeout rate, 90 MPH fastball, good changeup, breaking stuff needs some work.
6) Nick Delmonico, 3B-C, Tennessee HS: Will take second round money to sign away from Georgia. Power, strong throwing arm, first-round candidate early, stock dropped due to signability issue, erratic spring, as well as questions about long-term position.
7) Trent Howard, LHP, Central Michigan: Excellent command and control, velocity varies between 85 and 92 MPH, good changeup, curve, and slider. 2.78 ERA, 96/22 K/BB in 87 IP.
8) John Ruettiger, OF, Arizona State: Hits for average, runs very well, lacks power. Fourth outfielder profile. .332/.417/.398, zero homers, 34 walks, 23 steals.
9) Devin Jones, RHP, Mississippi State: Can hit 95 MPH and has a good slider, but spotty command hurt his college statistics. Good raw potential. 4.37 ERA, 49/26 K/BB in 60 IP.
10) Tyler Wilson, RHP, Virginia: Average stuff across the board, throws strikes, good performance for a top program. 2.34 ERA, 111/21 K/BB in 88 innings, 62 hits, just four homers.
OTHERS OF NOTE: C Adam Davis (11th round, Illinois) has some pop in his bat and a chance to be a solid defender. OF Jason Coats (12th round, TCU) has decent tools and a good track record of success with wooden bats; he could have gone several rounds higher. 3B Brad Roney (18th round, Alabama HS) has a power bat and could have gone 15 rounds higher if not for a strong Southern Mississippi commitment.
SUMMARY: Bundy is the big star here, while Delmonico and Roney are intriguing high school bats who would be a nice boost for the system if signable. The rest of the class focused on solid-non-spectacular college guys, none of them projecting as stars but they should get at least some role players out of them. Bundy needs to live up to expectations.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They got some pretty good picks in this years draft,
Bundy obviously will do good and i think will glide through the system. Wright and Simon i really like and it looks like they did some good in getting Esposito. Also i like the pick of Delmonico if they can sign him. Could be a hard sign as he want to go to Georgia.
by Jt Malley on Jun 13, 2025 9:45 AM EDT reply actions
I wonder if 'second round money' will be enough for Delmonico
If so, I think Baltimore ponies up & brings him into the fold. I thought that he & Josh Tobias (who went much later than Nick Delmonico) were looking for money around or in excess of what Nick Castellanos received last summer to even consider passing one their reportedly strong verbals to Georgia & Florida respectively but this stuff is fluid to say the least.
It’s hard to find any fault with the Dylan Bundy pick at the top. I’m not quite as high on Jason Esposito but he’s a fine pick in the second round between 60-70.
by Matt0330 on Jun 13, 2025 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
agreed they made some nice picks,
if Baltimore can sign there top 6 picks there smiling that will take alot but with those there hole system gets a great up, and this is already a pretty good system.
by Jt Malley on Jun 13, 2025 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I know McPhail believes in buying bats
And this really backs that up. Most of the top picks were pitchers, and I think the actual signs will go 2 to 1 pitchers to hitters.
by ADLC on Jun 13, 2025 10:34 AM EDT reply actions
RE: Tyler Wilson
To say that he has only “average stuff across the board” is just plain wrong. His slider is a true weapon and a well above-average pitch. When added to his well above-average control, I think that the O’s got a reat steal in the 10th round.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Keep an eye on my son, Jake "The Jacksonville Rifle" Dunning. From SS to the mound - exclusively toeing the rubber since March 2010.
by Fla-Giant on Jun 13, 2025 12:11 PM EDT reply actions
yeah ok
Yeah ok, the comment probably undersells him
by John Sickels on Jun 13, 2025 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I was only adamant because I’ve seen him pitch 3 times in the last 4 weeks.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner
Keep an eye on my son, Jake "The Jacksonville Rifle" Dunning. From SS to the mound - exclusively toeing the rubber since March 2010.
by Fla-Giant on Jun 13, 2025 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions
It's interesting to see draft philosphy emerge...
…first of all, it’s pitchers first and foremost. Second, it’s pitchers with good groundball rates, when possible (esp. considering the Camden Yards profile). In the past, they’ve leaned heavily towards the LHP type too to nullify LH sluggers in the league, and, pitch towards the relatively larger parts of Camden Yards for the preponderance of the time.
That said, the ideal Oriole pitcher has yet to be developed yet. Bedard was close, but he was a flyball-strikeout pitcher. Even Mussina (even though he was drafted before Camden Yards) wasn’t quite the perfect fit for the Os park, which some whispered was a factor why Mussina eventually left, because his home park suppressed his true numbers.
by basemonkey on Jun 13, 2025 1:33 PM EDT reply actions

by John Sickels on 












