Either/Or: Eric Hosmer or Mike Moustakas
I'm going to start working on the book this weekend. The first three teams I do are always the Twins, the Braves, and the Royals. . .just a traditional order, then I start changing things up.
Planning ahead for the Royals this morning, I started thinking about Eric Hosmer and Mike Moustakas. Both had outstanding seasons of course. Which one would you rather have? Moustakas had the amazing power season obviously, but Hosmer is a year younger, controls the zone remarkably well, and had a terrific season of his own. I think that Moustakas will show up a bit higher on most prospect lists, but is that right? Ten years from now, who do you think will be the better player?
NOTE: The use of the Hosmer photograph is not intended to lean the discussion in a particular direction.
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Positional advantage
I picked Moustakas largely because the replacement level is much higher at 1B.
by RM on Sep 30, 2025 2:02 PM EDT reply actions
I lean towards Hosmer, I like the bat more
And I don’t think that Moustakas lasts more than a few years at 3B without becoming a legitimate liability.
I just like Hosmer’s bat more, and realistically the offense is what’s going to separate these guys.
Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
by Satchel Price on Sep 30, 2025 2:20 PM EDT reply actions
Exactly how I feel
Cancel out the positional advantage since Mous isn’t all that great over there and Hosmer is a significantly better bat IMO.
Still… both elite prospects and I expect them both to be great MLB players.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Sep 30, 2025 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Pretty much how I see them
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by jar75 on Sep 30, 2025 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions
So we all agree!
Yeah!
Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
by Satchel Price on Sep 30, 2025 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
ugh thats boring
Come check out Bullpen Banter!
Follow Bullpen Banter on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Remember: baseball guys... baseball...
by JD Sussman on Sep 30, 2025 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with that too
I would also add that I’d take Myers over both of them
Buster Posey>
"Screw it, Redbull time"-Brian Wilson
by Gobroks on Sep 30, 2025 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Except you wouldn't
These two guys are two of the best hitters in the minors. Moustakas had a ridiculous season with a combined line of .322/.369/.630 and an OPS of .999 with 36 HR and 124 RBI. And that’s in a total of only 118 games. Hosmer on the other hand played 137 games with 20 HR, 86 RBI, a line of .338/.406/.571 and an OPS of .977. These guys had unbelievable seasons, and they are undoubtedly the best hitting prospects in the Royals organization. As good as Wil Myers is, these guys are better
by armets on Oct 1, 2025 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't think there's a right answer
I would take Myers over them both, but it certainly isn’t clear cut.
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by jar75 on Oct 1, 2025 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions
I think I'd still take Hosmer, but I'd take Myers over Moustakas
I just wonder about Myers’ glove behind the plate, and I think that a move to RF is somewhat likely because his bat is going to advance faster than his defense at catcher.
And once you do that, I simply prefer Hosmer’s bat- I think it’s a step above the other two guys.
Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
by Satchel Price on Oct 1, 2025 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions
I think he moves as well
But his athleticism should allow him to be a plus defender in right.
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by jar75 on Oct 1, 2025 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd take Myers over both
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Oct 1, 2025 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Not sure if I was totally clear... made it sound like a tie.
I voted Hosmer.
I do expect both to be within 5 spots of each other on my top 100… its very close, but all the same I do give an edge to Hosmer.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Sep 30, 2025 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Hosmer
and for me it’s not even close. Hosmer’s younger, he walks more, he strikes out less, he’s more athletic, he’s faster and a better baserunner, he’s a better defender, and his body type is more conducive to a longer career than Moustakas’. Moustakas’ sole edges on Hosmer are power, arm strength, and experience.
From an offensive standpoint, Hosmer just seems to be more advanced. This is especially apparent if you compare their sophmore year performances at a tough hitters park in Wilmington, Hosmer’s slash line of .354/.429/.545 is so much more impressive than Moustakas’ .250/.297/.421
Waiting for April.
by DC Royal on Sep 30, 2025 3:03 PM EDT reply actions
Moustakas’ sole edges on Hosmer are power, arm strength, and experience.
My impression was Hosmer has the edge in power. He was considered the best power bat in his draft class IIRC. Moustakas does have an edge in bat speed, though.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Sep 30, 2025 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions
i think...
what gives Moustakas the edge in power is the fact that Hosmer hits the ball on the ground more than Moustakas, who is actually a pretty extreme fly ball hitter.
by Alex Eisenberg on Sep 30, 2025 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm talking tools wise...
I’m not that concerned with their minor league components.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Sep 30, 2025 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions
There is also the issue of Hosmer not having a big platoon split like Moustakas - which also will affect the power numbers.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Sep 30, 2025 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Mous also had those crazy Home/Away splits in the Texas League
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by jar75 on Sep 30, 2025 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions
good point
I hadn’t checked Moustakas’ splits.
by Alex Eisenberg on Sep 30, 2025 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Moose
Was also regarded as having the best power in his class. At the time BA rated him at 80 power.
by deezle on Oct 1, 2025 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Pretty sure I've heard the 80 hung on Hosmer, too.
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Oct 1, 2025 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
I picked Mous
partly because of his ability to play 3B even though I personally feel that Hosmer will slightly have the better bat.
by Havok1517 on Sep 30, 2025 4:24 PM EDT reply actions
Mous for me
I’m just not sold on the idea that he is going to be a liability there quite yet, although I admittedly may be putting too much stock in the stong TZ numbers. This year’s numbers may change things for me. He has the arm for it for sure, though, and I feel as a former shortstop and not an absolutely terrible runner that his range will be fine at least for the time being.
In terms of the bat, Hosmer has answered questions about his power for the most part, although I’d still say Moose has more power in the long run. Hosmer has the better approach though. This pretty much comes down to how close Moose is and that I think he will be at least an adequate defensive 3B.
by Navi's_Navy on Sep 30, 2025 4:35 PM EDT reply actions
I like Hosmer
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on Sep 30, 2025 4:49 PM EDT reply actions
difficult to choose...
I’m leaning toward Hosmer because he’s a more disciplined/patient hitter. Power is a slight edge to Moustakas, IMO. Moustakas has a little more bat speed and puts the ball in the air more. Contact rate is basically even. But the patience is what gives Hosmer the advantage in my view. Also, Hosmer is about a year younger.
This is also assuming Moustakas has to move off of third base.
The choice gets more difficult if you include Wil Myers with these two.
by Alex Eisenberg on Sep 30, 2025 5:38 PM EDT reply actions
+1
Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
by Satchel Price on Sep 30, 2025 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions
keith law
Jaypers (IL)
Lots of differing opinions as to the ranking of the top 3 prospects in KC’s system (Hosmer, Moose, Myers). Could you rank them for us?
Klaw (1:22 PM)
Probably Hosmer, Myers, Moustakas. Definitely Hosmer first.
by matthewmafa on Sep 30, 2025 7:09 PM EDT reply actions
Moose!
Huge advantage in ISO and in the level of competition he succeeded against (AA and AAA versus A+ and AA). Then you get into the positional advantage between 1B and 3B.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Sep 30, 2025 7:56 PM EDT reply actions
Hosmer played in a much more difficult run environment
http://bullpenbanter.com/
by jar75 on Sep 30, 2025 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
I’m very impressed that Moustakas continued to hit when he was promoted to AAA, but his AA numbers were so warped by his home stats (his slg% was .496 higher), that I took his overall numbers with the proverbial grain of salt. In fact, Hosmer’s road #’s in NWA are far superior to Moustakas (.173 OPS higher).
I’ll grant some credit for positional differences, but it seems clear that Hosmer is the superior player. And Moustakas is real good.
by Burlin White on Sep 30, 2025 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Hosmer
just decided on this yesterday for my top 20. which will be done shortly. want to get this bad boy out before all the other ROYALS lists come out.
Hosmer is just a more complete hitter. he does everything well. i think he hit LHP better than RHP at AA.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
by doublestix on Sep 30, 2025 10:52 PM EDT reply actions
Hosmer is the better pure bat
His plate discipline is superb. If all goes well I can see him developing into a Lance Berkman-type hitter.
by deezle on Oct 1, 2025 8:25 AM EDT reply actions
Hosmer has the most potential I think
BUT I’M TAKING MOUSTAKAS!
And the reason is makeup. Moose is a no nonsense I’m going to kick your butt kind of make up> He’s going to do what he has to do. Hosmer is more of a follower type of personality. He can get distracted. Hosmer also had questionable character issues from some Facebook incidents. Knowing what I know, I want the guy who is going to be a leader and a guy who pushes the other guys around him to get better.
I take Moustakas.
Scouting the Royals
Royals Prospects
by 306008 on Oct 1, 2025 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
did you just pick Mous over Hosmer based on FACEBOOK incidents?
seriously?
are you 90?
by apoxonbothyourhouses on Oct 1, 2025 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
are you willing to ignore all of the Facebook incidents?
I think his point was that he likes Moose’s makeup much better than Hos’s - the Facebook stuff is just one of many components to 306008 making that preference.
The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Oct 1, 2025 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks SMG47
I base my opinion on his makeup on much more than facebook Mr. Apox. Facebook is the public knowledge so that’s why I cited it…..
Scouting the Royals
Royals Prospects
by 306008 on Oct 1, 2025 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
How many of the 20/50 best players in baseball would you say are great leader/character types?
Bullpen Banter
www.bullpenbanter.com
twitter: @alskor
by alskor on Oct 1, 2025 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions
And how would we even know?
I wouldn’t use the makeup thing in this case unless it was particularly a problem for one of the players. But considering that makeup isn’t considered an issue for either player, I’ll just take the one that I believe is more talented and polished.
Baseball is my preferred sport. It should be yours, too.
I'm an editor for Beyond the Box Score, an SB Nation blog.
by Satchel Price on Oct 1, 2025 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions
This
No one cares about the makeup of a player unless it’s an extreme to one end or the other, and a guy will have a career regardless if he has the talent. The difference is that the AAAA guy with tremendous makeup has a long career as a clubhouse guy at the end of the bench or bullpen while the guy with average MLB starter stuff and horrible makeup gets a very limited amounts of chances to prove himself before no one takes a chance anymore.
The reason guys like Elijah Dukes kept getting shots in spite of horrid makeup was the immense talent involved in the player. If Dukes had ever taken hold of one of his chances, we’d be talking about an All-Star player right now because the play when he was on the field was at that calibar, provided career growth. Josh Hamilton’s story is great, but honestly if he’s a borderline talent guy, that story never is allowed to happen. He would be a guy we’d have a “do you remember…?” special on ESPN about when he was promoted to head cashier at the local Wal-mart.
Extreme makeup can make or break you, true, but even then true exceptional talent will continue to provide opportunities while you correct the makeup issues. We’re not talking replacement level talent guys here, so the only reason to even discuss makeup is if it is a prolonged issue that is so extreme (drug use, propensity to fire weapons at random people, etc.) that it will prevent the talent from giving the player another opportunity. That is not the case with either of these players.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
by biggentleben on Oct 4, 2025 2:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Hosmer
1. I’m skeptical of Moustakas’s prolonged success. His inconsistency at the plate, lack of plate discipline, and questionable D mean that Moose has a very low floor and he’s basically got to do it all with power.
2. I’m assuming that Hosmer should be a good enough fielder at 1B or RF that he’ll make up most if not all the positional adjustment, considering Moustakas’s defensive deficiencies. Although, I’ve heard that Hosmer’s 1B defense isn’t coming along as hoped, considering that he’s pretty athletic.
The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Oct 1, 2025 1:25 PM EDT reply actions
Oh, and a HUGE caveat I forgot to mention
3. We’ve only seen a little bit of Hosmer, really just one season. Like any prospect, it’s never safe to assume that the rest of his seasons will go just like the one we saw.
The only people who really know where [the edge] is are the ones who have gone over it.
by SagehenMacGyver47 on Oct 1, 2025 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Moose has very good contact skills
Especially for a guy with his power.
http://www.crawfishboxes.com
by OremLK on Oct 1, 2025 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions
My issue is this:
I’d take Myers, ESPECIALLY if he sticks at Catcher, over both of these guys and it’s not really even all that close for me. If Myers moves to RF, I still take him.
He performed better than both Mous and Hosmer at the same places:
Myers, age 18-19:
Wilmington: .346/.453/.965
Burlington: .289/.408/.908
Hosmer, age 18:
Wilmington: .206/.280/.579
Burlington: .254/.352/.734
Hosmer, age 19:
Wilmington: .354/.429/.974
NW Arkansas: .313/.365/.980
Mous, age 20:
Wilmington: .250/.297/.718
It seems to me that Hosmer had a MONSTER year this year in Wilmington, but he was competing in the league for the 2nd time. Mous struggled as a kid who was a year older. Myers, however, was facing the competition for the first time and put up MONSTER numbers but then proceded to put up better power numbers as he went toe Burlington.
The issue, honestly, for me is that I have all 3 in a keeper fantasy league and I need to know which two to protect and which one to leave open to expansion. I’m leaning toward protecting Myers and bringing Mous up (i need a 3B). But i also have Trout (who will probably get fleeced). Oh, well.
by apoxonbothyourhouses on Oct 2, 2025 6:42 AM EDT reply actions
you need to throw out hosmer's first full season
his bad season wasnt a result of poor performance. the dude couldnt see! in high school my eyes went bad within a matter of weeks. i remember cursing at my coach when i got pissed because i couldnt hit a curve ball in practice. he told to me pick up the rotation and i responded with “what f*^&ing rotation?!”. it looked like a white blur to me. i went to an optometrist and found out i had -225 vision, got contacts, hit nearly .400 the following year. i can agree with your mous comp because that WAS performance related. id take myers over mous in a heart beat, but youre comparing apples to oranges with hosmer. not to mention hosmers line at wilmington is better. the other thing is, hosmer struck out nearly 20 less times in nearly 20 more games in wilmington than myers did. the lower k rate will give hosmer the better odds of maintaining his excellent obp and avg. that being said, myers’ k rate isnt horrible by any means.
my gut tells me moustakas is gonna flake out alex gordon style. to answer your fantasy issue- keep myers and hosmer. you’ll be much better off in the long term
by rangersfan24 on Oct 2, 2025 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions
I chose moustakas
Normally I’d take the guy who walks more.
But in this case moustakas has hit at AAA - 15 home runs and 25 k’s.
How often do we see power hitters that strike out so infrequently?
If I remember right, the only hitter recently with more home runs than strikeouts (over 30) is bonds in one of his better years.
Dimaggio and Williams did it a bunch.
That potential combined with the position advantage (despite me knowing nothing of his defense) made the choice.
That’ll be a fun offense if KC has some other players to complement these two with. I still expect more from Gordon at some point. But having two powerful hitters that don’t strike out excessively should be fun.
by Bay Ball on Oct 5, 2025 12:25 AM EDT reply actions
Mouse Tacos and Alex Gordon
I just look at Moustakas and I am afraid he will be Alex Gordon; exceptional minor leaguer, forgettable big leaguer.
by OmahaGiants on Oct 5, 2025 1:42 AM EDT reply actions

by John Sickels on 










