JERI's Update, and Question of the Day
Greetings! It's been a while since I've posted anything for John. He's driving through New Mexico, and has assured me that he will NOT turn left at Albuquerque (rim shot!).
Just a few updates in this post. First, and most importantly, we have the order site, www.johnsickels.net, set up for the BPB2010. Yes, it still looks like the work of a drunken monkey, and yes, I would be that monkey. However, the links work, and I'm hoping that it is pretty simple to use. The older PDF files and assorted hard copies we have available of past editions are posted on the second tab (on the left side of the site). I have reached a certain level of acceptance concerning my lack of artistic ability involving, well, pretty much everything.
Our older son has strep throat...he awoke Sunday morning, after an evening of trick or treating with two other families, with a fever of 103, and a really sore throat. We got the culture, and after the first dose of antibiotics on Sunday, he was already feeling much better.
So far, John, Jackson (the four year old) and I seem to be clear, as are our friends. Is it just our circle of friends, or do you guys notice that someone always seems to get sick 12 hours after a get together, so that both families have to be at red alert for a few days waiting to see who else will get the sickness spores.
NOW, for Jeri's Question of the Day...(Not a huge, groundbreaking question, I'm just really curious to see what you think...)
I'm guessing a fair percentage of you are watching the series. Does it diminish the fun/importance of the series since both teams are from the same geographical area? How much, if any amount, do you think MLB loses in merchandising and advertising revenue when there is a local series? Or, am I just a shallow fan for thinking it's a bit boring when the teams are neighbors?
Catch you later!
0 recs |
33 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Kinda
I just don’t care about the Yankees or the Phils- I’ve got no regional ties to either team (save for a Mets fan as a best friend, so I kinda hate the Phils) and I don’t really have a strong allegiance to any particular player (save Chase Utley and Nick Swisher, so that’s kind of a push). It sort of factors in, but not really.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Nov 4, 2025 12:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I was just talking about this the other day in terms of the Phillies being like and all-West Coast team. Ryan Howard is the only one of their starting eight that doesn’t have West Coast ties. Utley, Rollins, and Feliz were prominent players for California teams at some point, while Werth and Victorino were recognizalbe names in the Dodgers system for several years. Ruiz is from Panama. Ibanez was a Mariners favorite.
Not that these ties factor into baseball markets. Feliz and Victorino are probably the only two that at best have minimal impact on the post-season ratings. Phili and NY are such major baseball markets though that any loss in geographical ratings probably balances out.
I think it’s interesting how the two talk shows for George Lopez and Wanda Sykes were marketed. Lopez, more a West Coast comic, had promos running on TBS throughout the Dodgers and Angels series. Sykes, more of an East Coast comic, has promos running on Fox during the World Series.
by StickRat on Nov 4, 2025 12:42 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Uh huh huh huh huh... so.. uh.. if you're the monkey... can I spank you? uh huh huh huh
Does it diminish the fun/importance of the series since both teams are from the same geographical area?
No, but it does make me question the need for a whole day off to travel.
How much, if any amount, do you think MLB loses in merchandising and advertising revenue when there is a local series?
I think the “Subway Series” proved that an “all New York” championship allows the rest of the nation to tune out. The Angels and Giants series was not well received either.
Since 2004, there’s been barely any interest in the World Series, considering ratings of the past. I don’t know, really, if the problem is the teams playing or if it’s the way Fox maanges things. All indications so far seem to be that this WS is up form last year, but how much remains to be seen.
Or, am I just a shallow fan for thinking it’s a bit boring when the teams are neighbors?
It’s boring because the Phillies won last year and the Yankees have already won 26 times. In my heart of hearts I just hope both teams are killed in a plane crash because I don’t want either of them to win.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Nov 4, 2025 12:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
My money is on Fox's management
Since 2004, there’s been barely any interest in the World Series, considering ratings of the past. I don’t know, really, if the problem is the teams playing or if it’s the way Fox manges things. All indications so far seem to be that this WS is up form last year, but how much remains to be seen.
Constant product placements, two of the worst baseball announcers out there, too much fluff, advertisement-based breaks in the game, playing game seven long after the memory of summer has faded, and gametime scheduling that is inconvenient for everyone but FOX.
by JayWise on Nov 4, 2025 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
What the heck is up with starting a game at 7:57? It’s odd enough that most baseball games start at 7:05, or 7:10, but to start it at 3 minutes to the top of the hour is just stupid. I guess this way people on the East Coast don’t moan about the start being after 8. “Oh look the game starts at 7, we should be home in plenty of time to get some sleep before going to work in the morning.” Not!
Just my opinion — or am I the drunk monkey now?
This is our team, let's have fun with it! - dmitchell624
Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you're wrong.
by solace on Nov 4, 2025 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is it just
me or has Tim McCarver really gone downhill lately? I mean i remember him about 15 yrs ago being a pretty good announcer but now he is not
"More than likely JW never played sports above the youth level. It amazes me that he seems to have no concept on the common reactions of an adult athlete or their normal interactions between each other." - laxonto
by Michael Cave on Nov 4, 2025 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh it's definitely not just you
dude is a complete joke.
baseball rules.
by doublestix on Nov 4, 2025 4:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Almost as bad as listening to Congress.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
by demondeaconsbaseball on Nov 4, 2025 4:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I watched a game he broadcast in the late 80's on the MLB network this season
and he hasn’t changed a bit. He was just as awful then, people just weren’t nearly as informed as they are today and when you spewed unsubstantiated nonsense, it was just accepted because he played the game, it was assumed he knew what he was talking about. Today people question that nonsense.
Tools Whore
by Tyler on Nov 4, 2025 10:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That is actually an excellent pt
"More than likely JW never played sports above the youth level. It amazes me that he seems to have no concept on the common reactions of an adult athlete or their normal interactions between each other." - laxonto
by Michael Cave on Nov 5, 2025 10:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
McCarver
My friends and I watch Fox games just to wait and see how bad he sounds. Two years ago during a regular season game, Ryan Howard bobbled a ball and couldn’t pick it up the first two tries because he was rushing things and the runner was obviously safe.
McCarver: “How many times have you seen that? Never.”
Last year’s World Series, like Game 3 or 4 I believe, Victorino is on first, bluffing a steal.
McCarver: “The Phillies don’t have a stolen base tonight but it feels like they have three.”
Like seriously. And there’s other ones that are just classics.
“Giambi walks too much. He’s always clogging up the bases with all that walking”
“Watch Darren Daulton use his mitt like a glove”
http://www.shutuptimmccarver.com/tim-mccarver-gems/
"...It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again. Oh... people will come Ray. People will most definitely come."
by metsman128 on Nov 5, 2025 2:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This implies he was ever on top of a hill.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Nov 4, 2025 11:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he is awful
it’s shocking to me that fox hasn’t noticed
I love that not even he knew that he scored and he continued to try to put it in - Evilducks
by sharks on Nov 5, 2025 2:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Baseball and TV don't mix
I think its because baseball is not a good TV sport. You need to be at the game, in the environment to really enjoy a baseball game. Sure if its your favorite team, you can watch it on TV no problem, but if you don’t like both teams then you have a problem getting motivated. Not to mention that Tim McCarver is one of the most painful commentators to listen to.
by JFP on Nov 4, 2025 3:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
partial disagree, at least on the 'gotta be there'
I love listening to baseball on the radio, as long as the announcers are competent. Broadcasts out of Cincinnati, Milwaukee, LA, and San Francisco are my personal favorites (I’m an NL guy).
Can someone point to any really excellent television broadcasters? Seems like all of the high-profile ones get ragged on pretty good, (rightfully so, I think). I do remember being impressed by Al Leiter a couple years back, though only in a tertiary color commentator role.
by DevilsAdvocate on Nov 4, 2025 9:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Broadcasters
Well, I’m sure most agree that McCarver is terrible, but outside of that broadcaster preference is fairly subjective. Personally, I find Joe Buck to be awful. It’s like he’s reading out of the phone book when he does play-by-play.
Over the past few years, baseball has completely lost control of the presentation of its product in the postseason and that extends to the broadcast booth.
To me, baseball should INSIST that every World Series be broadcast by Bob Costas. I don’t care if he’s under contract with only NBC (and now the MLB network), make it happen. It’s a borderline crime against humanity that he is sitting at home while we are being subjected to Buck and McCarver…again. Here’s a sad fact, I believe this is 12th time Joe Buck has worked a World Series, which makes him the all-time leader in World Series telecasts.
While Costas would be at the very top of my list, I’d also have no problem with Jon Miller, Vin Scully, Dan Shulman, and a few others. It’s a shame that MLB has done such a poor job showcasing its product, especially in the broadcast booth.
by Lark11 on Nov 5, 2025 10:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the problem with Costas
Costas has been extremely vocal about his dislike of baseball’s economics, even during postseason broadcasts involving the same big-market teams that he’s critical of.
He is a hell of a broadcaster, but he’s uncompromising. It’s understandable that nobody who has any say in the matter is interested in having a guy with his views being the definitive voice in, say, a hypothetical Red Sox-Yankees playoff match. MLB and the networks have put so much time and effort into building up the mystique of the big market teams that they REALLY don’t want somebody who might knock that down. Better to go with the likes of Joe Buck, who is the broadcasting equivalent of macaroni and cheese.
Still, who wouldn’t delight in placing a bet on the number of times that Costas would refer to Mark Teixeira during the World Series as “the Yankees new ‘hired gun’”? I mean geez, even Mark Teixeira himself would probably smile sheepishly upon hearing it and go about his business.
by mrkupe on Nov 5, 2025 8:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not the geographical area
It’s that we know the Yankees are going to win and knew from the beginning because they spent half a billion dollars. I’m not holding it against them, they’re just doing what’s necessary to win, but it just takes away from it to know that the only reason they’re winning is because of what they spent in the off-season.
R.I.P Jazz #6
by was385 on Nov 4, 2025 3:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
In the interest of full disclosure, I'm a diehard Phillies fan
My guess is baseball makes a killing on Merch when the Yankees are in the WS (NYC is a huge market, and the Yankees rival the Cowboys, Red Sox and Tar Heels for sheer volume of frontrunner fans). NYC and Philly are top markets in terms of population and spending power. Honestly, I think this series or a Dodgers vs. Yankees World Series is MLBs dream money making scenario. A Brewers vs. Royals or Astros vs. Twins series would likely be a nightmare scenario for MLB in terms of merchandising.
by Cormican on Nov 4, 2025 3:35 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
your choice of a picture is outstanding.
"Ninety percent I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey.
The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
- Phillies pitcher Tug McGraw, on his plans for his $75,000 salary
by e-gus on Nov 4, 2025 3:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
My biggest problem is that I have to stop and think “Is there a baseball game tonight?” I shouldn’t have to think about this - it should be automatic. In other words, TV (FOX ) dictates too much. There is too much time between series and the “travel” breaks are too long. You simply lose interest in what is going on. Baseball still acts like they are the dominant sport in this country and don’t need to change and adapt in order to draw fans.
by KSM on Nov 4, 2025 4:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
love your joke about the website
Looks like it was made on Angelfire in the mid 90’s. Whatever works I suppose. I wasn’t going to say anything but since you did, I figure it can be laughed about.
by loop on Nov 4, 2025 6:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It only bothers me
Because I hate both teams with a burning passion.
Them being close to each other doesn’t bother me.
"I got my pregnant wife (the Yankee fan) with me. Hoping my kid learns to kick her everytime the Mets score." -Schifftis-
by future on Nov 4, 2025 7:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
geographical area
The closer the teams the more interesting it becomes. I think the subway series in 2000 was made more interesting due to the proximity of the two teams. I’m not sure if it has any real significance in merchandise sales, baseball is already a pretty regional sport and I don’t think the proximity of the teams would have any significant effect. It’s not like football where people will watch games for the sake of the sport and not for a particular team involved.
by daman316 on Nov 4, 2025 9:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Couldn't care less about the WS
But John ought to stop at Frontier Restaurant in Albuquerque (on Central/Route 66, right across from the UNM campus) and try their breakfast burrito.
by ozzman99 on Nov 4, 2025 10:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It's hard for me to be excited when the WS doesn't contain any teams from the middle US.
Pro baseball has always been a dream, so this is pretty freakin’ cool out here. -- Tim Steggall, undrafted Rangers minor leaguer.
by rooster on Nov 4, 2025 10:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
the only reason i could care more about a WS than this one is if...
A. The Royals are in it.
B The Cards are in it (so i can root against them)
I thought this was an awesome WS. Probably the best AL vs. the best NL team…tons of stars…it was definitely the best series in awhile
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Nov 5, 2025 12:02 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
for me
this series lacked luster because it was the two teams I was rooting against to make it there, for the first time ever I couldn’t even pick a team to root for. I heard that same feeling from a lot of baseball fans, and even some non-fans.
The one thing I get tired of hearing about is the size of the market of the two teams. I always kind of felt that people, and especially the media, would equate TV ratings of the world series to the popularity of the sport, that idea always kind of bugged me. Now we get all these ideas that the sport needs the big guns in the series for america to care, and I think that’s completely bogus. I for one just want to see different teams there every year, that I think would spread interest more, even if the TV ratings took a hit.
I love that not even he knew that he scored and he continued to try to put it in - Evilducks
by sharks on Nov 5, 2025 2:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Different Teams
But you have been seeing different teams there every year. There have been 13 different teams in the World Series this century.
2009: NYY vs. PHI
2008: TB vs. PHI
2007: BOS vs. COL
2006: DET vs. STL
2005: CHW vs. HOU
2004: BOS vs. STL
2003: NYY vs. FLA
2002: LAA vs. SF
2001: NYY vs. ARI
by FlipYrWhig on Nov 5, 2025 2:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Different Teams Part 2
Compare that to the 1970s:
1979: BAL vs. PIT
1978: NYY vs. LAD
1977: NYY vs. LAD
1976: NYY vs. CIN
1975: BOS vs. CIN
1974: OAK vs. LAD
1973: OAK vs. NYM
1972: OAK vs. CIN
1971: BAL vs. PIT
Just 8 different teams. And people weren’t complaining about competitive imbalance back then, IIRC.
by FlipYrWhig on Nov 5, 2025 2:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I know we've been seeing different teams now-a-days
which I have enjoyed, and was hoping it would continue, I wasn’t saying it wasn’t happening.
I love that not even he knew that he scored and he continued to try to put it in - Evilducks
by sharks on Nov 5, 2025 5:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
now-a-days
Oh, OK, sorry I misunderstood.
by FlipYrWhig on Nov 6, 2025 12:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs







