Not a Rookie: Billy Butler
Not a Rookie: Billy Butler
Billy Butler was drafted in the first round in 2004, 14th overall, out of high school in Jacksonville, Florida. Most teams thought he was a supplemental or second round talent due to his poor defense at third base and ugly body, but the Royals insisted that it wasn't a budget pick and that his bat was exceptional. They loved his combination of bat speed and strike zone judgment. Butler's pro debut was outstanding: .373/.488/.596 in 74 games for Idaho Falls in the Pioneer League. I was impressed and gave him a Grade B+ in the 2005 book, ranking him as the 44th best hitting prospect in baseball. My theory was that the bat was real, and even if he had to move to first base that he would hit enough to justify the rating.
Butler skipped past low-level Class A in 2006, beginning the year in the California League at age 19. He hit .348/.419/.636 in 92 games for High Desert. Everyone hits at High Desert, but he was young for the level and scouts loved the bat. He hit .312/.353/.527 in a 29-game Double-A trial, showing that the Cal League numbers were not an illusion. His batting stance was a bit unusual, and defense was obviously an issue. He shows a pretty strong arm, but lack of mobility knocked him off third base. The Royals were trying him in the outfield by the end of the year. I gave him another Grade B+ and moved him up to Number 29 on the hitting prospect list.
Butler spent 2006 in Double-A, hitting .331/.388/.499 at age 20. Any doubts that scouts had about his somewhat unorthodox stance were eased. I was also very impressed by his low strikeout rate: just 67 whiffs in 477 at-bats. The attempt to make him an outfielder brought very mixed results. He worked at it, and by the end of the year his glove was rated as poor rather than really terrible. Scouts were already projecting him as a born DH, but with a bat that would give him a long career. I gave him a Grade A- and ranked him at Number Seven on the 2007 hitting list.
The plan for '07 was for him to spend most of the year in Triple-A polishing his glovework, but Kansas City's need for hitting pushed the timetable up. He hit .292/.412/.542 in 57 games for Omaha, then .292/.347/.447 in 92 games for the Royals. Obviously he's a first baseman at best, and DH work seems best suited for him.
Exactly how good can Butler be with the bat? If he continues to develop, at his peak he could be something like a cross between a healthy Mike Sweeney and Edgar Martinez, combining a high batting average, terrific plate discipline, and a high slugging percentage. I think his power production is only going to increase; he hit 23 doubles for the Royals and some of those are going to turn into homers as he matures. In the minors he showed excellent BB/K ratios (43/32 in 203 at-bats for Omaha last year) and as he gets used to the majors that will carry forward.
Some additional questions. Will he peak early? He has a "bad body" and might not age particularly well. However, his low strikeout rate is, I think, a positive marker. Many hitters with "old player" skills have high strikeout rates to go with high walk rates, but Butler is more of a pure hitter than a slugger, and I think that will help him maintain his production assuming decent health.
As for the short run, projections for 2008:
Bill James: .297/.365/.473
Ron Shandler: 294/.364/.454
ZIPS: .288/.360/.471
Me: .293/.359/.465
All those projections show Butler adding some power this year. Certainly that can happen. But what if we see a batting average spike instead of (or even along with) a power spike? Could Butler challenge for a batting title even sooner than most people expect?
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that, barring a catastrophic injury of some sort, Butler will be an excellent major league hitter. But the exact shape of that excellence is still a question. He has the long-term ability to hit .340-.350 eventually. He could be a 30+ homer guy if he concentrates more on power at the expense of batting average. With a maximal outcome, he could do BOTH at some point.
The sky is the limit here, and it will be fun to see what happens.
Tweet
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
not that funny, but funny
What happens when you a combine a high batting average with a high batting average.... WOW that is one HIGH batting average.
I'm thinking like .470
by babaoriley7 on Feb 7, 2026 1:21 PM EST reply actions
its not a batting average
by nyybaseball99 on Feb 7, 2026 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
no way dude
by wily mo on Feb 7, 2026 1:54 PM EST up reply actions
Not a Rookie: Billy Butler
My concern is that a guy this young doing nothing but DHing is going to contribute to being out of shape and slower, even with the bat. At his age, I believe constant work will make him a decent fielder. Heck, he's on Kansas City, the minor league of the Majors. A good place to get a lot of work on improving his game.
by BaseballSteve on Feb 7, 2026 2:22 PM EST reply actions
Re: not a rookie
by Jgaztambide on Feb 7, 2026 2:28 PM EST up reply actions
yes.
of course i also like it because i have all of gallardo, butler, salty and lincecum on my fantasy team
by wily mo on Feb 7, 2026 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
Great addition
by drwmsu1 on Feb 7, 2026 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
sorry
Yes, if he can prove he can legitimately play the position he should be allowed to play. But if he can't even play a "below average" first base, then no.
by doublestix on Feb 7, 2026 5:12 PM EST up reply actions
Right on!
The Royals are very capable of posting a winning record in 2008. Butler was only one of four outstanding rookies playing for KC last year, joining Bannister, Soria and Gordon.
Talent is flowing into KC over the last two years, not the other way.
by James Quinn on Feb 8, 2026 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
I hope...
perhaps he has a 'bad' glove because he hasn't been allowed to stay at a position for very long...
I love this kids bat though...
by dbimberg on Feb 7, 2026 2:31 PM EST reply actions
I don't subscribed to this thinking
Can they turn into homers? sure. ARE they? I don't think you can say difinitively. I think the chances are more likely when you talking about a young physically immature player, but I think Butler is about as big as he is going to get, isn't he? A little bit of a homer review in opinion. I like Butler, but I still have questions.....questions that can be easily answered in short order but still.
My point is, if they DON'T turn into homers, where does he go from there? I'm not sure a sub 800 OPS with no speed plays at DH for very long.
by HuskerBob on Feb 7, 2026 2:34 PM EST reply actions
Every prospect has question marks
by Yoda on Feb 7, 2026 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
i know, seriously
by wily mo on Feb 7, 2026 3:46 PM EST up reply actions
Alot of the same things
by HuskerBob on Feb 7, 2026 4:12 PM EST up reply actions
Just real quick...
That is more applicable to a guy like Mauer than a guy like Butler.
by grozzy on Feb 7, 2026 4:27 PM EST up reply actions
sure
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Billy-Butler.shtml
butler yearly HR totals: 10, 30, 15, 21
lowest minor-league SLG: .499
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/B/Sean-Burroughs.shtml
burroughs yearly HR totals: 6, 2, 9, 3
highest minor-league SLG: .479
similarity index: "low"
by wily mo on Feb 7, 2026 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
+1
you make a good point though too -- Burroughs is sort of the anti-Maddux for irritating player comps.
by bleedjaxblue on Feb 7, 2026 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
Great
My post was specifically in reference to the thinking that doubles automatically turn into more homers as a player matures. Like you said, this same line was used for Burroughs and countless other prospects. It doesn't always hold true. If Butler posts a ML OPS anywhere near 8 balls his career path is going to very different from the one John suggests.
An alternate ending would be Mark Grace circa 1991 when after hitting over .300 with an OPS around 800 the Cubs told him he needed to hit for more power. He went on to hit .273 that year. Luckily for him he recovered. Grace had the gold glove defense to fall back on to add to his value. Butler will most definitely have to produce power numbers.
by HuskerBob on Feb 8, 2026 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
I think you might be a little too concerned with
by OldProspects on Feb 8, 2026 2:07 AM EST up reply actions
sure
i do think it's quite possible that he's more of an edgar (45 doubles + 25 homers) than a manny. but i don't think his power is going to be a problem.
by wily mo on Feb 8, 2026 8:10 AM EST up reply actions
+1
by Boxkutter on Feb 8, 2026 9:16 AM EST up reply actions
Question:
by Boxkutter on Feb 7, 2026 4:57 PM EST reply actions
the difference
by doublestix on Feb 7, 2026 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
And
by Brickhaus on Feb 7, 2026 6:23 PM EST up reply actions
differences
- barton is a lefty
- barton walks much more often
- barton's defense is merely poor, as opposed to "horrible" or "nonexistent"
- butler is bigger and stronger
- butler has shown more power so far
by jpahk on Feb 7, 2026 9:48 PM EST up reply actions
Butler
by Daniel Berlyn on Feb 7, 2026 9:25 PM EST reply actions
Thanks for the Not-a-Prospects!
by DMB Grays on Feb 8, 2026 12:24 AM EST reply actions

by John Sickels on 









