Albert Pujols Prospect Retro
Prospect Retro: Albert Pujols
Per reader request, a prospect retro for Albert Pujols.
Pujols was drafted by the Cardinals in the 13th round in 1999, out of Maple Woods Community College in Missouri. He was considered to be a promising bat, but there were questions about his defense, and many scouts thought he was too fat. Some scouts also questioned his listed birthday of January 16, 1980. He was born in the Dominican Republic.
Pujols made his pro debut in 2000, hitting .324/.389/.565 in 109 games for Class A Peoria, with 38 walks and just 37 strikeouts in 395 at-bats. He also got into 14 games at Class A Potomac, hitting .284/.341/.481, and went 3-for-14 in three games at Triple-A Memphis. I was extremely impressed with his bat, and gave him a Grade A- in the 2001 Minor League Scouting Notebook, rating him as the Number 18 prospect in baseball. I was a bit ahead of the curve on this. Baseball America put three different Top 50 lists in their '01 prospect book, written up separately by Jim Callis, Allan Simpson, and Will Lingo. The highest ranking for Pujols was #39.
While most people, including me, thought that Pujols would start 2001 in Double-A, he had a terrific spring training and won a starting job in the Cardinals lineup, hitting .329/.403/.610, quickly emerging as one of the very best hitters in baseball. His power has developed beyond where it was in A-ball, and he's maintained his exceptional plate discipline.
Did Pujols really come out of nowhere? He was a year ahead of schedule, but it's also true that Baseball America was tracking him, and I was tracking him, and other experts were tracking him too.
Comparable Players to Albert Pujols, through Age 24
Frank Robinson
Hank Aaron
Joe Medwick
Eddie Murray
Rico Carty
Jack Clark
Will Clark
When the WORST guy on your comp list is Jack Clark, you are a special hitter.
I think the only real question about Pujols is his age curve.
0 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Thank you, John. :)
Basically, if this were a graph, a slight increase toward the age 30 season, and slowly tailing off after.
by craig3410 on Sep 27, 2025 12:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
age
I'm not trying to dis on Pujols. He is one of the guys I go to see when the Cardinals come to Milwaukee. Not only is he an exceptional player, he is an exception person as well (from what I can tell). Last season I sat 3 row behind the Cards dug out and before his ab's or coming in from the field between innings he gave away his batting gloves amoung other things to the younger people in the crowd. It was at the end of the season and the Cards had the NL wrapped up. Rolen/Renteria didn't even play (which bummed me out, I got the tickets way in advance of the game in that location to see the defense from Rolen/Rent). That said, I couldn't help but think he was a lot older seeing him up close. I was 28 at the time and to think he was 4 to 5 years younger was sort amazing to a) believe or b) he didn't get blessed with aging looks for someone in the early to mid 20's.
Just my .2cents, he is a special hitter regardless of age and is intense to watch before/during the game how locked in he is for a meaningless game.
by FRANCHISEv2 on Sep 27, 2025 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way
Does anyone remember why his age wasnt verified back when all the guys were coming up older than their listed age a couple years back? Was it something to do with Albert already living here in the US? Did he go to high school here? Just curious...
by fatfrank on Sep 27, 2025 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
His birth certificate has been checked enough time
He's a very special hitter, and altough it seems like he's 30, he's not.
BTW, I'm 18, and I look like I'm about 15. :)
by craig3410 on Sep 27, 2025 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Checked
by CrimsonLiederhosen on Sep 27, 2025 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
age
As is implicit on this comment thread: is it Frank Thomas or Ted Williams?
I'd bet on the former, but only a nickel.
by wcw on Sep 28, 2025 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He went to high school
Hell, Barry looks only about 35 he must be 35!
by count sutton on Sep 28, 2025 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AFL
by LindInMoskva on Sep 27, 2025 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the best hitters
And he's defenitely special with his ability to not only hit 40+ HR's a year but also 40+ doubles as well as hit above .330... probably one of the best pure all around hitters in a long long while
by blinkshot on Sep 27, 2025 1:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Frank Thomas
The Age trend says players hit their peak from 27-30, but I can't imagine Pujols getting much better.
That's what brings me to Thomas. He was a two time MVP early in his career as we all know. His peak season was at age 26. He was still MVP caliber from 27-29 (high 170s OPS+), but he wasn't able to build upwards from the 212 OPS+ he put up in 1994.
I think that is the more likely path for Pujols than following say Ted Williams who was;
- on his own planet for a couple years through age 23
- went to war
- came back and picked up right where he left off
- Around age 29 slipped to being merely awesome before going to war again
- Came back in 1954 and was otherworldly again
by sfjg85 on Sep 27, 2025 1:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And just another thing
Do the injuries to Rolen, Walker, and the down year by Edmonds hurt Pujols #'s that much or has he just been unlucky? His OBP has gone up but his SLG is his worst since 2002. And what would one rate his defense at 1B now?
by blinkshot on Sep 27, 2025 1:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense
http://anaheimangelsblog.blogspot.com/2005/02/pmr-1b-david-pintos-first-base-numbers.html
by sfjg85 on Sep 27, 2025 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Theory
by AucklandGM on Sep 27, 2025 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
d
by rickieweekshof2028 on Sep 27, 2025 7:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thomas
by johnstjc on Sep 27, 2025 9:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re entry
by bluechipper on Sep 27, 2025 10:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah let's check his criminal record too
by sfjg85 on Sep 27, 2025 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SFJG
by CrimsonLiederhosen on Sep 27, 2025 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
of course
but what difference does it make? his stats are impressive and hes the best hitter in baseball right now regardless of when he was born.
actually, maybe he wasnt born, that could explain things, he was genetically created in a lab somewhere to be the ultimate right handed power hitter.
by lmao on Sep 28, 2025 1:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Palmeiro
by JFP on Sep 28, 2025 12:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
re: setup
Raffy used. Raffy Got caught. All MLB did was not look the other way.
Your version makes for a good Oliver Stone conspiracy film, but I don't see it as realistic.
by natsfan2005 on Sep 28, 2025 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
for conspiracy theorists
LOL!
by So Cal Bob on Sep 28, 2025 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IF Pujols was already
I don't know the complete facts and that's why I posed the question. But it seems to me if went to high school here then his birth certificate would have not been put under the scrutiny that some of the foreign players are put under today. There just wasn't the need 10 years back.
From my understanding, if a person/player had residency here in the US then the need to verify their work visa when the came back to the US was not there. Another example off the top of my head is Miguel Tejada. Again I dont know the exact stipulation, but I know its something along those lines.
Look, I love watching Pujols and think the things he has done are amazing. It has nothing to do with trying to tear the "KID" down, but I just don't believe the guy is 25 years old.
I guess nobody will probalby ever no for sure on Pujols or some of these other foregin players.
However, I do think Pujols will still be proucing at the level he is now in five years when he's 30 (Or 35, in "the guys trying to tear him down" mind) Hell, even Julio Franco is still a productive Major leaguer and look he's like 47 or 55 the "conspiracy theorists" say!
by fatfrank on Sep 28, 2025 3:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
circumstanial evidence
Pujols made an incredible leap forward in 2001 going from hitting .324/.387/.565 in the midwest league to hitting .329/.403/.610 in the majors.
That is an amazing improvement to make in one year, actually having a better year in the majors than the one he had the year before in low A.
It seems to me that huge leap forward is at least circumstanial evidence that Pujols is the age he says, since it is much more likely for a player to make that leap between 20 and 21, than between 24 and 25, or whatever the real age that some think Pujols was at the time.
by tinsmith on Sep 29, 2025 11:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
replying to your previous comment
by Isisaston on Dec 19, 2025 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs




