Detroit Tigers Draft Review
More from the AL Central, with the Detroit Tigers.
Detroit Tigers Draft Review
1S) Nick Castellanos, 3B, Florida HS: A first round talent who fell due to signability, Castellanos won't be cheap to ink but the Tigers won't let that stop them if past history is any indication. He has a strong bat, should hit for power and average, and can be a good defender at third.
1S) Chance Ruffin, RHP, University of Texas: Very polished with a great breaking ball and decent heater, Ruffin was overwhelmingly successful as a college closer this year and won't take long to reach the majors, though it may be more as a middle man. He draws comparisons to Huston Street at the same stage.
2) Drew Smyly, LHP, University of Arkansas: Lefty can hit 93 MPH on his best days, has good cutter, changeup, curveball, usually has good control. Solid pick in the second round.
3) Rob Brantly, C, UC Riverside: Best features are plate discipline and defensive athleticism, but scouts don't think he'll hit for power. He should get to the majors, though, at least as a backup.
4) Cole Green, RHP, University of Texas: Average-to-mediocre stuff, but a great feel for pitching and a successful record in a top college program. May be a fifth starter or long reliever and won't need much minor league time.
5) Alex Burgos, LHP, State JC of Florida: Burgos has average stuff but an excellent performance record, but lacks the projection for his velocity to increase. He's interesting, but a slight overdraft in my view.
6) Bryan Holaday, C, Texas Christian University: A senior, Holaday is a very good defensive catcher with a strong arm. He also has power in his bat, though not everyone agrees that this will translate against higher level pitching. But I do like the pick as an affordable player with a good shot at reaching the majors.
7) Corey Jones,2B, Cal State Fullerton: Second baseman with some pop, good speed, and a more-than-adequate glove up the middle.
8) Patrick Leyland, C, Pennsylvania HS: Decent catcher with offensive potential, but raw. Perhaps a courtesy draft since his dad is the Tigers manager, but most nepotism picks usually aren't in the single-digit rounds.
9) Tony Plagman, 1B, Georgia Tech: Another senior, has strong power in his bat but lacks tools.
10) Cole Nelson, LHP, Auburn: Big guy at 6-7, throws 90-92, has a good breaking ball, inconsistent. Might be a nice reliever someday.
FOUR OTHERS OF NOTE: 11-Brian Dupra, RHP, Notre Dame; 14-Patrick Cooper,RHP, Bradley; 17-Drew Gagnier, RHP, Oregon; 23-Dominic Ficociello, SS, California HS.
COMMENT: The Tigers made a big splash with Castellanos, but went conservative with the rest of the class, focusing on solid college players with limited upside but good performance records. Most of these guys could be useful role players and there was an interesting focus on catching. Ruffin, Smyly, and Green should all reach the majors quickly but aren't likely to be stars. The success of the draft will ride a lot on Castellanos.
0 recs |
20 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Getting Castellanos makes up for the decision to give up their first round pick to the Astros by signing Jose Valverde.
The Tigers got a better guy at 44 than the Astros got at 8 in my opinion.
by OremLK on Jun 11, 2025 2:05 PM EDT reply actions
Does it matter...
That Jose Valverde has been outstandingly outstanding?
by UncleBuck44 on Jun 11, 2025 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions
He could have given up zero runs in thirty innings at this point in the season and I still wouldn’t be sold on giving up my first round draft pick for a relief pitcher. But like I said, going overslot to get a natural first round talent (some think a top ten talent) in the middle of the supplemental makes up for it, somewhat.
by OremLK on Jun 11, 2025 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions
It's all about the big club
The 19th pick is a small price to pay for a shutdown closer. You need a good pen to win.
And like you said, they made up for it by spending big in the supplemental 1st round. If you’re going to do that when you lose a 1st round pick then there’s nothing to worry about. You come away with help now and later.
by UncleBuck44 on Jun 11, 2025 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m a firm believer in pulling closers off the scrap heap. Paying big bucks AND a first round draft pick for one is just wasteful.
by OremLK on Jun 12, 2025 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Would they have even taken a different player with 19, had they had it?
by limozeen on Jun 12, 2025 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Possibly
They might have gone with Zack Cox instead. Pay the money to a more polished player that was likely to give them a return on their investment.
Although with another 600-700K to crank out(assuming you switch Castellanos money to the 19th pick and pay slot at 44) you never know.
Maybe they sign Ficociello to make up for the loss of the pick. Pretend Castellanos was taken 19th and Fico was a supp 1st rounder. A bit of a reach but so were a lot of 1st round picks.
They have Valverde and Castellanos so Tigers fans should be very happy.
by UncleBuck44 on Jun 12, 2025 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions
This
I was angry we lost the pick (and still kind of am- we might have landed a Cabrera or an Allie if we had the extra pick) but getting Castellanos makes up for it.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 12, 2025 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the point is that it doesn’t really “make up” for it; it’s clear that this organization’s plan all along has been to pay over slot with its supplemental pick to make up for the loss of their first rounder. They got the player they wanted in free agency and the player they wanted in the draft.
by limozeen on Jun 12, 2025 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Awful draft...
Outside of Castellanos, I’m not sure there’s a single potential impact guy in that entire draft class (I’m excluding Ficociello who I highly doubt they will sign). Definitely in the bottom 5 in the MLB.
by Franchise887 on Jun 11, 2025 3:17 PM EDT reply actions
The Tigers need system depth badly
There’s little in the high minors, especially at first base and the outfield, so fast moving college guys can help improve overall system strength. There may not be impact players, but there’s a lot that can get to AAA and rounds 1 through 6 feature players that have a good chance of making the majors.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 11, 2025 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
As I replied below...
System depth should never, ever be a focus. You draft for talent, guys who can help your MLB club actually win games. When you draft for depth and backups, the result is a draft that doesn’t really help your MLB club at the end of the day. Who cares if a guy makes it to AAA? You need guys who can be starters on your MLB club, not your AAA team.
by Franchise887 on Jun 12, 2025 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually like this draft
They got 5 guys who will enter their top 30 in their first 5 picks-and if Castellanos decides he really wants to go to college the Tigers can focus their efforts on Ficociello
Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster
by Gobroks on Jun 11, 2025 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't count out the Tigers signing both
If Mr Illich wants to spend the cash, he will.
President, Vice President and Secretary of the Casey Crosby Fanclub.
Assist. Editor, Minor League Division, Bless You Boys
by David Tokarz on Jun 11, 2025 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions
If they could get both that would be incredible
Castellanos was the guy that I wanted my Giants to draft
Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster
by Gobroks on Jun 11, 2025 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
Also, something people haven’t talked too much about is the fact that Castellanos’ family is from Detroit even though he never lived there. So growing up all of his family has been Tigers fans. You can’t tell me that won’t make an impact on his decision.
by nborton on Jun 12, 2025 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Awful? Really?
Sure it’s not incredibly flashy, but there are a lot of guys who will move quickly thru their system. It’s not the sexiest drafting, but it’s not “awful.”
by DetroitTigersGeek on Jun 11, 2025 5:03 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Moving quickly is meaningless...
It doesn’t mean anything. Ask the Red Sox whether they wish they could have back the draft classes where they were picking guys like David Murphy and Brandon Moss because they could “move quickly”. You draft for impact, guys who can actually be starters (and hopefully at least MLB average), not backups. When you draft for backups and depth, you draft to lose.
by Franchise887 on Jun 12, 2025 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Its "okay"
I think all too often people get caught up with the guys who have the most upside despite how raw they might be.
While its important to draft high upside guys no matter what the bust potential may be, its also just as important to diversify with some guys who have a lower ceiling, but a higher floor.
That being said, while I fully understand the thinking behind drafting Ruffin (in all likelihood it was a pick made on the cheap to be able to throw more money at Castellanos), I’m not a fan of the Tigers drafting more RPs so high in the draft.
I feel you can get RPs from virtually anywhere, and I would’ve much rather had seen them draft a young SP with upside over a RP. A guy like Allie was still on the board.
I don’t have a real issue with Ruffin other than the fact that its probably the lowest priority in the Tigers system right now.
Keeping drafting SPs, and convert the ones that fail into RPs.
Overall though, the draft is an “okay” draft, but signing Castellanos is paramount.
With their history of getting tough signs on the dotted line, I feel like they just landed their 3B of the future.
2010 Tigers contracts coming off the books:
Maggs (18M)
Willis (12M)
Bonderman (12.5M)
Robertson (9.5M still being paid this year)
Inge (6.6M)
Damon (8M)
2011 is the year of the Tiger!
by sportznut3081 on Jun 11, 2025 6:52 PM EDT reply actions
From now on
Expect David Chadd to take a reliever or two in the top 2-3 rounds. He and Jeff Luhnow love their college relievers. Chadd usually gets them a little earlier than Luhnow but they both get them.
I should add that I don’t mind it that much as major league bullpens are about 100 times more important than they once were. It’s almost impossible to win without a good bullpen. Plus good relief prospects have pretty good trade value. The Cardinals got Mark DeRosa with a pair of relief prospects.
Chadd goes after relievers a little too early and too much for my liking. Luhnow does it right. Starting in the 3rd round is ideal. 2nd round is about the earliest I’d want one. He went after Chris Perez in the supplemental 1st round in 2006 but that was a BAD draft. Perez is pretty solid and not many guys have been.
by UncleBuck44 on Jun 11, 2025 10:20 PM EDT reply actions
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!
by John Sickels on 









