Minor League Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Brotherly Game for Philadelphia Union Fans!

Texas Rangers Prospects Discussion

Here is a thread to discuss Texas Rangers prospects. This is a deep system, LOTS to talk about here.

Is Derek Holland as good as I think he is?

0 recs  |  Comment 182 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Is Derek Holland as good as I think he is?

Yep

Nine in '09 series: Matt West

by jparks77 on Dec 13, 2025 1:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

If he's throwing mid 90's from now on

absolutely!

In 57 innings at A+ and AA he struck out 66 while walking only 11 and allowed 34 hits, only ONE of which was a bomb. After throwing 150 stellar innings last year, this kid is close. Count me among the believers

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 1:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

can i go ..

one day without reading about derek holland? this is getting ridiculous. i know he’s good and all that, but this is getting insane. this site has a mancrush on holland and i’d rather not hear about it any longer.

by psugator on Dec 13, 2025 5:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Probably not

when you’re reading a thread about Rangers prospects.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Dec 13, 2025 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sure

You can start by not opening the thread on the damn home page where John asks the question, “Is Derek Holland as good as I think he is?”

I bet I’m more tired of hearing people bitch about how tired they are of hearing about Holland. Because by posting it, you are thinking about him for longer than you had to, and guaranteeing yourself some smart ass replies… thereby causing you to hear/think about him again.

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 7:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That about sums it up

For as much as I think Holland is over-hyped here… it’s far short of the LincecumisGod.com stuff we saw here a few years ago. By posting that he’s literally just asking for more.

by slurve on Dec 14, 2025 7:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And you know ...

the Lincecum fanboys were right.

by Flynn Blake on Dec 14, 2025 12:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

I was and still am a card carrying member. I’m definately not on board the Holland bandwagon tho… I think he’ll be good - just not as good as some see him as.

by slurve on Dec 14, 2025 1:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I sort of agree

I don’t think anybody has really been predicting him to be a HoF prospect though. He’s just a guy with a very good chance (or as good as any prospect has) of being a very good pitcher, and maybe an outside shot of being an ace.

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 14, 2025 3:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Or the Cole Hamels

stuff, or any number of other flavors of the month.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 14, 2025 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

by alskor on Dec 14, 2025 3:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

doesn't he have fantastic control of three average to above average pitches?

Then yeah, I think he is as good as you. Are those pitches even average? I hesitated to say “doesn’t he have fantastic control of three plus pitches?” Would that be wrong john?

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Dec 13, 2025 1:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think he'd be a better pitcher than John, but not as good a blogger.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 5:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I had heard his breaking ball wasn't as good as we thought

Did I mis-hear?

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 13, 2025 6:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Holland

Plus-plus fastball, above-average/plus changeup, fringe average slider, good control?

It’s surprised me that nobody has thrown out the Johan Santana comp on Holland. Holland’s a little bigger and his secondary stuff isn’t quite at that level, but with that scouting report Santana was the first guy I thought of as a potential upside for him.

by mrkupe on Dec 13, 2025 1:13 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Upside

Yeah, I can see that as his potential ceiling, but not his most probable landing spot. Santana has more than a plus changeup. It’s downright devastating. Holland has a lot of work to do to have a second devastating pitch.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 13, 2025 1:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Further note

I think I’d still take Brett Anderson over Holland, but that’s just preference. I also think, though, that Holland is the best pitching prospect in this system.

by mrkupe on Dec 13, 2025 1:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yea depends on what you prefer

anderson is the safer bet, but i believe holland and feliz’s ceilings are both higher than either cahill or anderson’s

by dustinvandeman on Dec 13, 2025 1:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not Santana but Kazmir has been thrown out there.

Big discussion at lonsestarball on how to interpret that comp. Basically, not that a scout thinks he will become Kazmir, but ,like Kazmir, Holland can bring it and has a pretty good slider. I think I recall reading more about Holland’s change than his slider during his AA run, but the real story on Holland is his command of his fastball and the velocity he added this year. The question is whether the velocity will be there next year.

Go Rangers!

by rooster on Dec 13, 2025 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And while Im here, this is my take on our top 20

1Derek Holland A-(Cream of the crop. You won’t agree John because he has only had this year to shine. If he put these numbers up last year, he would be a lock for an A player right?)
2Neftali Feliz B+(Another possible A player, he possibly won’t develop two other out pitches which relegates him to a super-uber closer role instead of a mainstay starter. I think Rangers fans would still be okay with that)
3Justin Smoak B+(possible A player come next year, just needs to see a full year of ball)
4Mike Main B+(another year like last season and his stock will raise significantly. Three great pitches with control-wooo watch out)
5Martin Perez B- (Gotta love the high upside that this kid has and to show as much skill at his age you can’t help but to fall in love with him)
6Taylor Teagarden B- (a promotion to the majors last year saw him handle an out of control pitching staff very nicely for the short amount of time I saw. Can his bat translate though?)
7The King Andrus B- (errors might be his only down fall, but in this league it shouldn’t matter. But it will if he is still a Ranger)
8Max Ramirez B (Massive power which entitles him the nickname of MaxRam, probably better suited for a DH/3rd catcher role)
9Julio Borbon B (Questions about his bat should be overlooked. He hits for average, can play an above average D in center, and can probably man a lead off role for many years to come. And to think people were questioning us about drafting him where we did. It was a steal, imo.)
10Eric Hurley C+ (Wow has his stock fallen, but do to injury and an unbelievably great top 9 can you really complain?. He has a huge bounce back season…..that’s what I see in my crystal ball, john)
11Engel Beltre (Hype. Do you believe in it?)
12Blake Beavan(Flamethrower no more? I think his stock rises next year)
13Kasey Kiker (Maybe most have forgotten or will forget him, but I still like him)
14Wilfredo Boscan
15Jose Vallejo
16Niel Ramirez
17Tommy Hunter (Will probably round off the back end of a nice Texas rotation starting in ’09)
18Robbie Ross ( Maybe one of the biggest steals of last years draft John?)
19Wilmer Font
20Omar Poveda

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Dec 13, 2025 1:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think you confused

your B’s and your B-’s

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oops,

 WoW, you sir are right..:)

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Dec 13, 2025 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

that was NYTXFAN’s rankings, not what he expects from John. With the amount of B- and up prospects Oakland has, we have to have 15-18 guys in the A- to B- range

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 2:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know.

I was making the point that his grading was…harsh.

by LiamP on Dec 13, 2025 2:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Grades were a little harsh and I think Sickels will actually grade them higher than I did,

and yes they do have the number one system in the league in my eyes.

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Dec 13, 2025 2:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who are these 15-18 guys?

C — Teagarden, Ramirez
1B - Smoak
2B - Vallejo
SS - Andrus, Lemon
3B - ?
CF - Borbon, Beltre
OF - ?
P - Feliz, Holland, Main, Hurley, Hunter, Ramirez, Boscan, Murphy

Anyone else? Is Beavan really more than a C+?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 5:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

I’m not sure who they were referring to, but if you’re counting the ones you list as in that range, that’s 16 right there.

"So's your mom"-David Sloane

by gatling on Dec 13, 2025 5:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes I was trying to get some specificity on that very general comment

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 6:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Lemon is a B- or higher

You omitted Perez from the pitchers. Beavan is probably more than a B+, I would think.

by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2025 5:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What's the attraction of Beavan?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 6:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He once had awesome stuff

and he showed great control last year. If the stuff comes back, he’s going to be a great pitcher.

That’s the thought process anyways.

by FirebatM3 on Dec 13, 2025 6:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

First round pick in 2007...

…who debuted in full season ball and had a solid season.

by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2025 6:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Does that warrant more than a C+?

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 6:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

20 walks in 121.2 IP.

Mitch Moreland - Rangers 2009 Minor League Player of the Year

by RangerMad on Dec 13, 2025 6:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Strikeouts?

Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.

by doublestix on Dec 13, 2025 7:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

73

More towards the end of the year.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 13, 2025 7:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I could see someone

like Kiker or Robbie Ross getting a B-,

by FirebatM3 on Dec 13, 2025 6:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

at least several of that second tier of Rangers pitchers (Ross, Kiker, Boscan, Ramirez, Beavan, Poveda, Font) will get B-’s. My guess would be that Ross, Boscan, Beavan, Ramirez, and Poveda are the most likely, and Font and Kiker slightly less likely (for completely different reasons)

by JBImaknee on Dec 15, 2025 5:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone you mentioned

probably minus Lemon

definitely plus Martin Perez

possibly minus Murphy

possibly plus Robbie Ross

15-18 right there… you did well

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 6:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Kiker

woops, missed Kiker completely. He’s a possible addition, had a down year as far as guys making contact with him and him missing bats… but he was in the Cal league and significantly improved his control for the third straight year. Heard he showed up out of shape to start the year off and his velo was down from late 2007, won’t be surprised if John has him at C+

I am a believer in Kiker this year. I read some interview with him where he seemed a little mad at himself for the condition he showed up in. I have a feeling he’s gotten the sense that the competition bar has been raised, and we’ve always heard about that competitive mentality he has. He could show up in Frisco with something to prove, in the best shape of his life, and really jump back into the thick of things considering he’s just behind Feliz and Holland and just in front of a hoard of talent. Make or break year for Kasey

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 6:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You touched on something important in my mind...

I think one of the reasons the Rangers haven’t been able to turn their best pitching prospects into good MLB’ers is because of a lack of competition on the farm. Guys in the system right now are well aware they they are going to have to bring it day in and day out to beat out the other equal prospects for that next promotion. Add the Nolan ‘I hate panzies’ Ryan mentality to that and it doesn’t matter where you were drafted, how big of a bonus you got, or who your daddy is, you better be at the top of your game from day 1 to the end or you are going to be left behind very quickly.

by rothe on Dec 13, 2025 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So, in the past the Rangers couldnt develop good pitchers because their prospects didnt want it bad enough…?

by alskor on Dec 14, 2025 3:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not "want" it

But think about the dynamic. The more that talent interacts with talent, the more improvement you see. That’s the whole idea of the highest levels of professional sports. You have a bunch of guys that are high ceiling talents on the same pitching staff together, so they’re gonna know who they are competing with. We saw Beavan go from saying “I can pitch as bad as some of these guys” as a senior in high school, to saying, “I realized I’m not the only guy who can throw hard” a year later. Strikeouts aside, Beavan pitched really well for a kid that lost some real velocity. The lower levels of the minors definitely tend towards high levels of competition for rotation spots in the Rangers system.

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 14, 2025 4:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not exactly...

but they may have felt entitled to it. Or they may have seen that they were already light years better than their rotation mates so they didn’t see the need to strive to get better.

by rothe on Dec 14, 2025 9:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My Top 20

Prior to John’s (The Master) Evaluation…I’m sitting here:
1. Jarrod Saltalamachia, B-; Probably should be taken off the list, but he’s yet to start a season on the 40-man roster. He didn’t wow anybody last year…but he’s in the show and he’ll have an opportunity to show his stuff if he isn’t traded.
2. Elvis Andrus, B-; This guy has more potential than anyone on the list, but speed can’t get you all the way.
3. Justin Smoak, B-; The best hitter taken in 2008. Not sure what they are going to do with Chris Davis once Smoak is ready…or vice versa. Can’t move him higher since he’s at least 2 years away.
4. Chris Davis, B-; This guy doesn’t have the potential…but he does have the resume. I wanna see what he does in his second season before I get too crazy…but so far so good!
5. Neftali Feliz, B-; I didn’t have him projected to move up this fast, but he’s really making the case. I’m just a little bit worried that he didn’t have the same success at AA that he had at single A.
6. Micheal Main, B-; Has the potential based on single A performance, but didn’t look “special”…could go either way at this point.
7. Blake Bleaven, B-; Very much like Main. His stats were a little better, but he gave up the long ball too often. I like him, so I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt and say next season things turn around.
8. Kennil Gomez, B-; VASTLY under-rated in these discussions. Very similar stats to Main and Bleaven.
9. Derek Holland, B-; VASTLY OVER-RATED in these discussions. The stats look great…but I’m worried that he went up to fast. One more season of what he did in 2008, however, and it’ll be time for him to start moving up my list fast.
10. Max Ramirez, B-; I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt because he’s close…but his failures at AAA and MLB levels worry me.
11. Eric Hurley, B-; Got a chance last year and didn’t look great…but I think he’ll improve depending on his health.
12. Julio Borbon, B-; Putting up the numbers so far. Would like to see a little more power and see if he can hit .300 at the AAA level.
13. Neil Ramirez, B-; Good groundball pitcher, would like to see more.
14. Kasey Kiker, B-; He throws strikes, over 100/year…but it also shows in his ERA.
15. Tommy Hunter, C+; He’s got something…just need to see if he’s going to be successful at the MLB level. Need to see more.
16. Omar Poveda, C+; Good groundball pitcher, throws strikes…just not sure if there’s anything special that’ll make him anything more than a middle reliever.
17. Matthew West, C+; He’s still got a ways to go…but I gotta put a guy that hits .400 somewhere on my list.
18. Greg Golson., C; A top 10 prospect in the Phillies organization, he has the numbers to make a case for a trial run in the show.
19. German Duran, C; Lack of power worries me.
20. Matt Harrison, C; A good groundball pitcher that will probably never be more than an average middle reliever in a bad ballpark.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 2:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

" He throws it where he wants it, his breaking ball kept getting better and better and of course God gave him that special arm. He's great." ~ Neftali Feliz on Derek Holland.

by Kinslerhomer on Dec 15, 2025 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

comical

Just because I don’t have man love for Derek Holland doesn’t make it “comical”.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 5:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comical

in many ways, but let’s just start with calling Smoak the best hitter in the 2008 draft and then giving him a B-, and then listing Chris Davis - who is no longer a prospect - as a B- despite already having success at the major league level. Even if Davis doesn’t keep that pace up he’s earned better than a B-.

And Feliz. Everyone in baseball thinks this guy is one of the best ten or dozen pitching prospects right now and you give him a B-. Is B- your highest grade?

If Holland “moves up your list very fast” does that mean a higher ranking with another B- grade?

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 15, 2025 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Top 10 pitchers

Smoak is 2 years away…Davis has had a great START….to me a B- indicates that there has been a glimmer of “something” and it’s time for them to either build a case or fade away.

According to the “experts”, Feliz would be Top 10 in the American League, not MLB.
If I were to list my top 10 AL pitching prospects, it would look like this (“expert” rankings in parenthesis):

1. David Price (1)
2. Rick Porcello (4)
3. Justin Masterson (not ranked as prospect)
4. Brett Anderson (3)
5. Trevor Cahill (2)
6. Gio Gonzalez (8)
7. Brian Matusz (14)
8. Jeremy Hellickson (10)
9. Wade Davis (6)
10. Tyler Robertson (35)

13. Neftali Feliz (9)

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 10:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so you're

still saying that Kennil gomez and kasey kiker deserve an equal ranking as Holland and Feliz. And if im reading that right Davis does too?

ok you’re grading sucks, period

by blalock84 on Dec 15, 2025 11:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yes

The problem with your logic is you’re assuming Holland is some superstar. Most “experts” have him as a top 30 pitcher. Those same experts have Feliz as top 20 and Hurley as top 40. So if Holland is only about 10 spots better than Hurley…and Hurley is on par with the rest of the depth…why is it so outrageous that one might give Kiker or Gomez similar ratings.

Remember, I’m not saying Kiker is better or that Gomez is a “A-”…I’m just saying they are all in the same general ballpark.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 11:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously?

You weren’t joking? I mean, it wasn’t really funny, but for a lion I thought it was a nice try.

As for the rest, Holland isn’t a superstar, but he is a very good prospect. I have no idea who these “experts” are, but who still rates Hurley as a top-40 prospect?

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 16, 2025 12:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

superstar, or

not he’s still a way superior prospect

by blalock84 on Dec 16, 2025 2:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

i hope you're

just messing around, but if you arent, you’re list is ‘comical’ b/c you have the majority of the players rated exactly the same. Kasey Kiker and Kennil Gomez aren’t anywhere close to having the same grade as Feliz and Holland. I dont care how much you like or dislike a guy, they just arent in the same category. If Chris Davis was still listed as a prospect, i’d about guarantee you he’d be a top 10 or 15 player in the minors, he hit 40 HRs bt AA, AAA and the Majors. and i dont know where to begin with the rest of it….

i really think you’re just joking around and trying to rile up all the ranger fans here, if so, then bravo.

by blalock84 on Dec 15, 2025 8:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice

So everyone in the system is a B-/C+ player. Got love the consistency.

by aCone419 on Dec 15, 2025 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

?

You think he meant to say that they were all B+/C- players?

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 15, 2025 2:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe he thinks A, A-, B+, B, B- and C+ all look like “B-”

by alskor on Dec 16, 2025 1:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yes

Just because a team HAS a farm system, doesn’t by default mean they have “A” players. This isn’t Tampa Bay or Oakland. Salty was an A until he perfromed so sub-par last season. Every other guy on the list has shown “signs” of being “A” calibre…but none of them have more than a season of good enough stuff to warrant it. The other guy gave Holland an A- after one decent season. So Holland rates higher than Rick Porcello, Wade Davis, Jeremy Hellickson, Brett Anderson, Gio Gonzalez…because of ONE season?

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 6:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't Hollands ONE SEASON better than Porcellos ONE SEASON?

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Dec 15, 2025 7:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The problem wasnt your lack of "A" prospects

I think everone objected to the lack of B+s and Bs.

by alskor on Dec 16, 2025 1:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

flawed logic

Last time John came out with his book, Price was a B+. So you’re telling me Feliz can hold a candle to Price and is deserving of a B+ as well? I’d give Salty an B+…but he bit last year. I might give him a B, but he’s going to be fighting just to keep a spot against Teagarden. So he gets a B-. Smoak is too young to get anything higher at this point. Andrus would have gotten a B+…but he has no power. He would have gotten a B, but he has no defense. The way I see it, B-, C+, and a few Cs…that’s the Rangers system until some of those B- players step up and show that they can do it over two seasons and at the next level.

by Aslan on Dec 16, 2025 3:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I’d give Salty an B+…but he bit last year. I might give him a B, but he’s going to be fighting just to keep a spot against Teagarden.

So if he was on another team he would be a full “B?” THAT is flawed logic.

Bottom line is grading everyone in the friggin system a “B-” is silly.

by alskor on Dec 16, 2025 3:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

maybe

The bottom line is he went from being the second best catching prospect in the league (far and away)…to a guy that can’t take a starting job away from Gerald Laird. Ad now he’s sitting in spring training fighting another rookie for this year’s starting spot. None of that screams “talent”. None of that screams “B+” prospect.

Salty has the skills to be a clear winner in the battle between himself, Ramirez, and Teagarden…but at this point he’s either going to get traded of sit back and watch Teagarden take his spot…and that’s sad.

by Aslan on Dec 16, 2025 3:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

that Salty has question marks - and if you were downgrading him for those that would be appropriate. If youre downgrading him because he’s blocked by another player… that I dont really understand.

The way youve downgraded all these guys that pretty much everyone else has as Bs or B+s…. well, Im not saying youre wrong, and youre certainly entitled to your opinion… buts it a little weird… maybe even a little creepy. Too convenient.

14 guys - ALL of them B-’s…?

by alskor on Dec 16, 2025 3:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In That Case

Make me a list of all your players that are higher than a B- and would be number one on the Ranger prospect list.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 16, 2025 3:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just for the record

Last year, before he had pitched a single inning in the minors, John gave David Price not a B+ but an A. https://www.minorleagueball.com/2008/1/10/12229/1262

He also named him the #4 pitching prospect in the game. https://www.minorleagueball.com/2008/5/28/540416/2008-top-50-pitching-prosp

Considering that was the only year he ever got a ranking, I don’t think he ever graded him with a B+.

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 16, 2025 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the book

I’ll have to check the book when I get home. I believe I took that rankig directly from his 2007-08 Scouting Book, not the website.

My point was, ya don’t just hand out an A automatically to the best player in each team’s farm club. David Price could be one of the best pitching prospects of all time…maybe top 10, maybe top 15. Feliz isn’t even in the top 10 of current pitching prospects and is 9th in the AL.

I’ll put together a list of the top 10 players in the AL with a grade of B+ or better when I get home…I don’t have my list with me at wrok.

by Aslan on Dec 16, 2025 11:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't have the book with me right now

but I seem to remember he gave him an A in the most recent book, and the previous year he was still in college.

Of course not every team’s top player gets an A - only the top 6 or so players overall get As. And then another 10 or so get A-s. And then another 70 or so get B+. And then a 100 or so get Bs. You’re basically saying that the Rangers will have nobody in the top 200. Which is ludicrous.

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 16, 2025 10:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Link

https://www.minorleagueball.com/2008/1/10/12229/1262

2008, A. This was his ranking without having thrown a single pitch.

by aCone419 on Dec 17, 2025 5:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Salty isnt even a prospect anymore dude.

Not to mention this system is of quality if not better than Tampa and Oakland. You did a horrible prediction of the top twenty so just move on. You don’t know our prospects obviously.

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Dec 16, 2025 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My List

My list keeps players as prospects until they start the regular season on a 40-man active roster. Both Salty and Davis started last season in the minors and were called up during the season. Since both will start the year with the club this year, they will both be subsequently removed.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 6:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why do the Rangers get to have a 40 man active roster when other teams only get 25

Doesn’t seem fair

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 15, 2025 8:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So

A guy that starts the year on the 40 man roster but never gets promoted to the majors loses his prospect status? And say, a guy like Longoria that gets his contract purchased a couple of days past opening day still gets to retain his for a full extra season even though he had over 500 plate appearances in the majors? Good plan!

Well, I at least hope Longoria is your overall #1 prospect going into 2009.

by jibs on Dec 15, 2025 9:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

potato potawdo

Who cares? If it annoys you so much that Salty and Davis are on the list, imagine they aren’t and use your math skills to figure out how that changes the rankings. It’s really not that important.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 11:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I imagine there would be two more “B-”s somehow.

by alskor on Dec 16, 2025 1:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Salty was on the 40-man roster

He was already in the majors when they traded for him. I don’t think you know what the 40-man roster is.

by aCone419 on Dec 17, 2025 5:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yea, but no

…he started in AAA in 2008. The Rangers sent him down and then called him back up soon after. If the player isn’t on the active roster of the team at the start of the season, he is on my prospect list. I try to weed out guys that get sent down because of performance (sent to minors indefinitely), but like I said…Salty, Davis, and probably at least 4 more will come off the prospect list after opening day…because they will be on the active roster.

by Aslan on Dec 17, 2025 6:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I may be confused, or just have missed him

and this is going off the assumption thats its your list above, but Davis didn’t make your top 100 “prospects”?

by groundingout on Dec 17, 2025 11:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

oops!

Good catch!

#20, Chris Davis, 31.1

Sorry bout that.

by Aslan on Dec 18, 2025 2:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Anderson and Cahill are B+s, you cannot realistically put Holland at A-

and even Feliz is pushing it.

Personally, I’d put them all at A-, since they’re four of the 7 or 8 best pitching prospects in baseball, but what do I know.

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 13, 2025 1:56 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

They're all about even

I’d say they all deserve even grades, because none of them have done anything to say without a doubt that one is better than the other. I’m fine with top pitching prospects getting a B+, because of the uncertainty of attrition with pitchers.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 13, 2025 2:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, all 4 seem like elite pitching prospects to me

But A-, B+… whatever. Both teams know they have 2 of the 10 best arms in the minors.

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 2:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

this

Some of the most violent things I’ve ever seen were at Raiders games. And I’ve been to jail. - leopold bloom

by designatedforassignment on Dec 13, 2025 3:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

All 4 of those guys

are A- to me, all definitely top 10 arms right now.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 13, 2025 3:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are Anderson and Cahill...

…that clearly ahead of Feliz and Holland?

by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2025 3:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

His argument is that

Feliz and Holland aren’t far enough ahead of Cahill/Anderson to warrant a higher grade, and I agree with that. Holland has the best numbers with the least track record, Feliz has one plus pitch and walks some guys, Anderson is polished without the upside of a Cahill/Feliz, and Cahill still has some refining to do.

Again, I think most of us agree all these guys are A-, but John is pretty tough on pitchers.

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 4:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

.......... well met, sir

Your 2008 Athletics: It's Nothing Personal.

by PaulThomas on Dec 13, 2025 11:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOVE the top 3

imo teagarden overrated but will be a solid, above avg catcher due to the defense
alot of upside arms in lower minors…until rangers break the track record of developing and keeping good pitchers, there will be some doubt
it maybe the best farm system, but not the deepest…on the flipside IF their prospects turn out well, depth doesnt matter other than future trade bait

by Asfan4ever723 on Dec 13, 2025 2:02 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Depth

I think the consensus is that Texas does indeed have depth, just not a ton of high impact players at the superstar level. When you start running down the system level by level, you see that each level had guys that are seen as potential quality MLB players. The system is especially deep for pitching across all levels. I’d say this is the best farm system because of the depth.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 13, 2025 2:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Texas definitely has the depth,

no question about that. But the depth might be more along the lines of future bullpen aces instead of all starters, and major league everyday players instead of superstars. But they are stacked no question about that.

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Dec 13, 2025 2:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who has multiple superstars as prospects?

Feliz and Holland are arguably Top 20 guys. That’s two high grades. It’s not like they have 42 B- prospects or anything.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 5:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

If anything they have a ton of high upside guys, like font, boscan, feliz, holland, main, beavan, and then upside hitters like smoak, engle beltre etc

by FishHead on Dec 14, 2025 3:27 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So

Every team has a couple “potential stars”. That and a bus ticket can get you a ride to the store. For anyone to say that the Rangers have a better farm system than Tampa Bay or Oakland is crazy! I’d take Anderson/Cahill/Gonzalez over Holland/Feliz/? everyday and twice on Saturday. And I’d take Hellickson/Davis/McGee over Feliz/Holland/? also in a heartbeat.

And other than Smoak, they got no power hitters. now, if you have mad love for the Rangers…and you want to brag…they have the most quality talent at cather than any other farm system…bar none. There ya go…be proud.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Crazy

apparently a lot of people at Baseball America and Baseball Prospectus are crazy since they both say that Texas has a better system than Tampa right now, and is even with or better than Oakland. Did someone with a Rangers hat kick your puppy or something?

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 15, 2025 7:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

corrections

Baseball Prospectus has Tampa #1, Oakland #2, and the Rangers #3.
Bleacher Report has Tampa #1, Baltimore #2, and the Rangers #3.

If you want to say the Rangers are better because they have more depth SOLELY because David Price moved up and Carlos Gonzalez got traded…okay…but the bottom line is that the Rangers can’t take their top prospects and compare to Tampa and Oakland.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 8:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

uh ok

but i think you’re gonna be sorely disappointed by the majority of the people who rank farm systems…

by blalock84 on Dec 15, 2025 8:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

okay

If the majority of these people are Rangers fans with imaginary experts claiming that Holland is a cheese sandwich away from being the next Roger Clemens and Feliz is better than David Price ever was…then yes, I will be sorely disappointed.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 8:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I really need to rein in my mad love for the Rangers....

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 15, 2025 8:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we all know that you were just pretending to be an As fan

so as to be a spy for your true loyalty, the Rangers. Growing up in New York, it was hard for me to convince people that I’m not a Rangers fan, but I tried my best. Finally, though, my secret is revealed

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 16, 2025 12:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction for you

Those rankings you gave are for last year. 2008 is over sir.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 16, 2025 3:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I know nothing of Holland's stuff

but taking a look at his accent this season, I was immediately reminded of Brandon McCarthy’s ’04.

AIM: SouthSideCheat

by The Cheat on Dec 13, 2025 2:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Whoa, whoa, whoa

just because the guy’s a Dutch doesn’t mean he has an accent!

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 2:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not that there would be anything wrong with it if he did.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 13, 2025 5:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clearly

Smoak A+

by BuckyB on Dec 13, 2025 2:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No way...

Smoak should not be more than a B+. The only person in their system with a shot at and A is Neftali Feliz with Holland and Andrus with a shot at A-. They should have a lot of people with at least a B or B- like Smoak, Beltre, Main, Perez, Teagarden, Borbon, Beaven, M. Ramirez, N. Ramirez, and Hurley.

by joegonzo on Dec 13, 2025 3:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Smoak

He’s clearly a B+ player, especially when you consider Yonder Alonso was a B+. He’s not an A- yet, but he’s a strong B+.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 13, 2025 3:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

A+ is too high

for anyone except God on Sickels’ list, but what part of Smoak’s game pushes him down to a B? I could maybe see a B+ because of limited pro time so far, but a B? Great bat, solid defense, what is not to like?

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 13, 2025 3:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Never mind

I think I misread your post.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 13, 2025 4:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

With some of the B+ grades that have already been handed out

Smoak is a shoe-in B+

"Holland didn’t make that kid question his swing, he made him question his career path"

by trident on Dec 13, 2025 4:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Andrus

an A- with a .717 OPS?

by TCapone30 on Dec 13, 2025 7:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As one of the youngest

players in AA, who’s numbers improved every month? Yeah.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 14, 2025 12:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Meh

.717 is still .717 any way you slice it, and I say that as somebody who really likes Andrus.

He’s a very hard guy to evaluate, because A) he’s so young for his competition that you can’t expect all that much in the first place and B) he still profiles as the sort of player who’s probably never going to blow you away with his numbers until he reaches his physical prime. Like, if he played in Bakerfield this entire year, his line would still be something like a whopping .750 OPS, if I had to ballpark it without taking the time to check. It’s not necessarily a bad line out of a 19 year old shortstop with a Gold Glove, but to the sabermetrically inclined it’s nothing special. Middle infielders have always been notoriously difficult to evaluate under such criteria.

by mrkupe on Dec 14, 2025 12:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Even if he pans out

he’ll have that kind of OPS this year and his first couple years in the bigs as he grows and adjusts. I think it will be his 3rd year in the big leagues before he really takes off as I expect him to. Then he’s probably going to be a .750+ OPS SS with good defense. A valuable player.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 14, 2025 1:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

But that’s not an A- prospect. He’d need to be another grade or two higher as a hitter to go on that kind of ledge for him. Having to project to get a guy to above .750 OPS should make everyone pause.

by mrkupe on Dec 14, 2025 1:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No, there you're wrong.

This year, a .750 OPS would have been 4th among AL SS, and the defense would have been better than the 3 ahead of him (Peralta, Ramirez, Jeter). That’s a player in the discussion for best SS in the AL. And I think he’ll be above .750 in his prime, closer to .800.

How many of the NL SS that are hitting so well also have plus defense? It is very unusual to have a SS that fields well and also carries a bat above average for his position. Beltre did nothing to improve his mark from last year, but Andrus did nothing but help his.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 14, 2025 6:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rollins, Hardy, Reyes, Escobar all qualify. Hanley is good enough defensively

for his offense.

It's not the results, it's how you look going about those results -- Tim McCarver

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 14, 2025 8:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Andrus as an A- right now is far too generous

Andrus would need way more polish before he could be considered an A- right now. Just take another offensive prospect that just got an A- as a baseline in Matt Wieters. Wieters is displaying exceptional power right now, he’s got exceptional OBP and K/BB rates right now, and he projects to be a solid-to-great defender at a premium position in the majors right now.

Andrus has yet to display any real power and may never develop a solid power component in his offensive game. As such, he’ll probably need to rely on an OBP in the .350 ~ .400 range in order to sniff a .750 OPS. Given his K/BB rates I don’t think it’s a guarantee that he’ll carry that type of OBP into the majors. He’s young enough where either a power surge and/or a refinement in plate discipline could happen, but it is a major leap of faith to assume that either of those things automatically will happen.

And while everybody is penciling him in as an elite defensive MLB SS, he must have some things to work on in that regard given his 32 errors in 109 games as a SS this year.

I’m not saying that Andrus doesn’t have the potential to be an A- type prospect, but he’ll have to actually show improvements in the areas where he is lacking before he can deserve that sort of grade.

by jibs on Dec 14, 2025 11:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not that I think he should be A-

but you did pick the best offensive prospect in the game to compare him to. Moustakas or Hosmer would have been a better comp as they are likely borderline A-/B+. Andrus shouldn’t be A- though.

by groundingout on Dec 14, 2025 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Andrus OPS by month

April: .612
May: .665
June: .782
July : .805
August: .754

"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract

by tyd3311 on Dec 14, 2025 2:12 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Injury

It should be noted he was injured in the early part and after coming back from that injury he was really really good

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Dec 14, 2025 6:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Fine

A (leaning towards A+)

by BuckyB on Dec 13, 2025 4:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This thread feels incomplete without Dewey Finn's opinion!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
-Jonathan Swift

by King Billy Royal on Dec 13, 2025 3:24 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

haha

Honestly, Derek Holland should get the first ever A+++

He will make people believe that Rangers Ballpark is a pitcher’s park.

Now raise your goblet of rock. It's a toast to those who rock!

by Dewey Finn on Dec 13, 2025 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Are you actually being honest?

Or is this like when people say my heart literally jumped a beat?

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Dec 13, 2025 6:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Okay...

And Brian Matusz will make people forget he pitches for the Orioles. yeah right!

The problem with Ranger pitching talent is as soon as they get to play in the major league, they get shelled because dudes can hit softballs out of that park. Is Millwood a bad pitcher? No. Is Padilla a bad pitcher? No. But combine their ERAs and it equals most team’s entire staffs. The only thing worse than being a starting pitcher for the Rangers is finding out you just got traded to the Rockies.

by Aslan on Dec 15, 2025 6:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You

have singlehandedly done a tremendous amount of damage the reputation of Derrek Holland.

He should be everyone’s favorite sleeper right now but most of the people on this site are just sick of hearing how Superman wears Derek Holland underwear. I wouldnt be shocked if people were cheering for him to fizzle out for spite.

by alskor on Dec 16, 2025 1:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Holland

If Holland’s success relies on what I say or don’t say….well, that’s sad. I like the kid…believe it or not…I like his numbers. I lean slightly towards favoring Kennil Gomez and Beaven…but I could see Holland moving up fast if he has a 2008-09 like he did last season. And I do like Feliz, he’s surprised me. And I’ve been touting Smoak since before he got drafted. There’s talent there, I just need to see more of a pedigree than what these guys can do in one year in AA.

by Aslan on Dec 16, 2025 3:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The only reputation he'd damaged

is his own. Holland’s is fine.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 16, 2025 12:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

By position

These are guys that deserve mention:
C - Teagarden, Ramirez - both locks
1B - Smoak is a lock, Moreland gets honorable mention, Clark Murphy is a sleeper for next year. Moreland has played RF and may pitch some this year…
2B/SS - Andrus is a lock, Vallejo in upper teens maybe, Lemon hon. mention,
3B - Whittleman hon. mention, Matt West sleeper in ‘09
OF - Borbon, Beltre both locks, Golson hon. mention, Tim Murphy, Juan Polanco and Mike Bianucci are sleepers for ’09. Santana’s ceiling remains sky high, but he just strikes out too much.

RHP - Feliz - duh, Main, Beavan, Ramirez, Boscan, Hurley, all on. Font, and Wieland, maybes.
Gomez, Poveda, Pimentel deserve consideration; Castillo, Diamond hon. mention with too many questions. 2009 Sleepers are Tanner Roark and Reinier Bermudez.

LHP - Holland - duh, Perez and Kiker go on. Tim Murphy and Robbie Ross should be close.
Corey Young, Geuris Grullon, and Miggy De Los Santos are my sleepers for next year.

This system is as deep as any right now, weaknesses at 3B and power in the OF. More pitching than you can shake a stick at, and we’ve had discussions over at Lone Star Ball about just how they’re going to get enough innings for some of these guys in the three A ball league rotations, and maybe even AA.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 13, 2025 3:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think you meant Tim Smith in the outfield.

" He throws it where he wants it, his breaking ball kept getting better and better and of course God gave him that special arm. He's great." ~ Neftali Feliz on Derek Holland.

by Kinslerhomer on Dec 13, 2025 4:35 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I sure did

thanks.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 14, 2025 12:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

what is your def. of a sleeper

for prospect-hounds who know the system well?

by Goyogringo on Dec 14, 2025 1:20 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm talking of guys

I expect to be more noted at this time next year, and perhaps entering the discussion for the top 20-25.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Dec 14, 2025 3:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll take that

I think to make it simpler I would go with guys not in the top 30 or guys who improve their ranking by 10 or more spots.

by Goyogringo on Dec 14, 2025 4:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

What's not to love?

Holland throws hard from the left side, did great at all three levels that he pitched at, ended the year at age 21 in AA, throws with control, movement on his fastball. What else could he possibly show to be considered one of the better pitching prospects?

The guy not enough people mention in that system that I think could be great is Wilfredo Boscan. He has good size and might still grow an inch or two and will add 10-15 lbs., already throws in the low 90’s with movement, has terrific control and has a reputation for toughness.

Andrus will be like Vizquel in that the first few years in the bigs will seem like nothing special with the bat, but this guy has makeup galore. I would expect that he will hit in the .240-.260 range with minimal pop until he’s 24-25 and then start to add doubles and triples and maybe 30 points to his average. Whether this makes him a A-, B+, who knows, but I think he will require patience for the Rangers, and then he’ll be so worth it.

by mac37203 on Dec 13, 2025 3:48 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Geuris & Juan of the Fighting Grullons

You heard it here first, folks.

by naropean on Dec 13, 2025 6:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

of course, of course

I wasn’t trying to announce the Grullons to the world, but only a dumb nickname for them. Obviously we Rangers fans have known about those guys for a couple years through our wonderful Z-Hindman-Newberg-Parks prospect hounds, but I was just mentioning them for those on minorleagueball that don’t know of them yet.

by naropean on Dec 13, 2025 9:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah. sorry. that was a tad harsh.

For some reason I didn’t register your username from LSB.

Go Rangers!

by rooster on Dec 14, 2025 2:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I post sporadically

It’s easy to miss me. No worries.

by naropean on Dec 14, 2025 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Beavan

His first year in low A and people are writing him off after being one of the top prospects in 07 draft. He’s learning how to be a pitcher not a thrower, should not be written off. I say he had a breakout 09.

Also keep an eye on Joe Wieland, 4th round draft pick had a great debut.

by thebroman on Dec 13, 2025 8:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

oops

meant to say Beavan will have a breakout 09 - should read before posting!

by thebroman on Dec 13, 2025 8:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why complain?

The ERA looked pretty and he barely walked anybody . . .I think he’s a perfectly respectable prospect.

by mrkupe on Dec 13, 2025 8:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Duran Duran

German Duran was a B last year. Got sporadic playing time this year and didn’t do very well. Is he still a prospect or is he most likely going to be a UTIF?

by The Colonel on Dec 14, 2025 8:06 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Utility

He doesn’t qualify as a prospect statistically, either. 143 ABs. But he projects as a good bat utility infielder in my opinion.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 14, 2025 8:17 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He has something

but a B was always too generous. John was the only person (that I saw) to identify him as a legitimate prospect after 2006, so he probably had a good vibe after Duran’s breakout 2007. I’d say that he’s the kind of guy who looks like a backup/utility type, but who has enough pop that if he made some contact and got an opportunity, he could pop up as someone’s every day 2B at like age 27 or 28 and not have a bad year.

by Brett Perryman on Dec 15, 2025 1:15 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

4-H Club

Please rank Holland, Harrison, Hurley and Hunter 1 thru 4.

by The Colonel on Dec 14, 2025 8:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

1. Holland
2. Hunter
3. Harrison
4. Hurley

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 14, 2025 8:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd go

1. Holland (by far, at this point)
2. Hurley
3. Harrison
4. Hunter

Neither of Harrison or Hunter look like they will be more than a back end starter. Hurley probably won’t be, but I think that he stands more of a chance of being consistent than Harrison.

by Brett Perryman on Dec 15, 2025 1:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

question ...

Can I get some info on Robbie Ross and Clark Murphy? I just picked them up in a DMB deal and would like some detail info. Both guys seemed interesting and I took a flyer

by NYSOX on Dec 14, 2025 9:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ross

Supposedly viewed as a first round talent by some people, slid into the second round because of bonus demands. Small lefty (only 5’10", I believe), throws hard. Has been compared to Billy Wagner, like every small hard-throwing lefty.

Murphy was a high schooler who, according to scouting reports, had big raw power but issues with the rest of his game. No speed, limited to 1B defensively, but his bat may be enough for him to advance.

by Adam J. Morris on Dec 14, 2025 10:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ross Writeup

Kyle Boddy at Driveline Mechanics just did a writeup on his mechanics with some good background info, too. Link Here.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 14, 2025 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yea

he definitely could. He had some nice outlier stats in the Cal lg last year as well as a really good year in CLinton in 07. After he came back from an injury he pitched a whole lot better at the end of the year. Got a real nice Changeup/Fastball combo.

by blalock84 on Dec 14, 2025 5:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm interested to see where Moscoso will rank.

It seems like mid-teens is the general opinion of Rangers’ prospect followers.

Go Rangers!

by rooster on Dec 15, 2025 10:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Seems about right

I’m thinking of putting him somewhere between 17 and 20 on my list. Trying to decide where he slots against Robbie Ross, Joe Wieland, and Carlos Pimentel, the 3 who are 18, 19, and 20 for me.

Mike Grouse Interview - Rangers' Midwest Cross Checker

by Andy Seiler on Dec 15, 2025 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed
Start posting on Minor League Ball »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Punto_small
Milton Bradley = Kanye West of Baseball?
Small
If Mejia starts the year in the majors: Just how stupid?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ryan Westmorland
Small
Community Prospect #93
Small
Top Latin-American Prospects (2008/2009 class).
Small
Community Prospect #92
Small
Minor League Assignments
Small
Community Prospect #91
Yankees_small
Prospects on Major League Rosters Right Now!!!!!!!
Small
Community Prospect #90
Deadhorse_small
Jason Heyward Named Braves' Opening Day RF
Small
Too much talent - who do I cut (final update)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

In Association With

MLB -- FanHouse

  • Resurrected Carlos Silva Fits Neatly in Cubs Rotation
  • Red-Hot Tyler Colvin Wins Spot on Cubs
  • Obama to Throw Out First Pitch Opening Day in Washington
  • Angels Make Their Own Luck on Bases

SBNation.com Recent Stories

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Philadelphia Phillies, New-Look But Same-Look

+4 updates

Spring Training News & Notes, 3/29: Catching Up With Everyone

link

Twins Opt For Closer By Committee After Nathan's Injury

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Carew_small John Sickels


Site Meter