clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Not a Rookie: David Murphy

New, 3 comments

Davidmurphy_medium 

Not a Rookie: David Murphy

David Murphy was drafted by the Boston Red Sox in the first round in 2003, out of Baylor. The 17th overall pick, he was considered a mild overdraft by many experts, as a lot of teams saw him as a second round talent rather than a first rounder. He had solid tools across the board and was polished, but there were questions about how much power he'd show with wood. He hit .346/.453/.397 in 21 games in the New York-Penn League after signing, but just .242/.329/.307 in 45 games in the Florida State League. Having seen him quite a bit in college, and considering the FSL to be a big jump from Baylor,I was optimistic at the time and gave him a Grade B in the 2004 book.

Murphy's 2004 season was disappointing. He hit just .261/.323/.346 in 73 games for Sarasota in the Florida State League, however he was hampered by a painful foot injury most of the season, and was never 100% physically. Even accounting for the injury, scouts were panning his power, and his strike zone judgment wasn't great. I gave him a Grade C in the '05 book, but noted that it wasn't quite fair to judge him until we got to see what he could do with better health.

He got the better health in '05, playing 135 games for Double-A Portland, hitting .275/.337/.430, okay but hardly outstanding performance. I wrote, "if you watch him play, he looks like a hitter: smooth swing, makes contact, doesn't swing at many bad pitches. But so far at least the numbers just aren't there. He works hard and is reasonably good on defense, but if he wants to be a regular he's got to boost the hitting." I gave him another Grade C, and was projecting him as a reserve outfielder.

Murphy began 2006 with Portland, hitting .273/.316/.436 in 42 games. Moved up to Triple-A Pawtucket, he put up similar numbers at .267/.355/.447, but showed improved plate discipline and a higher walk rate. He got into 20 games with the Red Sox, hitting .227/.346/.409. I wrote in the 2007 book that Murphy looked like he'd be a fine fourth outfielder, projecting him as a .260/.340/.420 hitter at the major league level, but not likely to hit enough to be a regular for a good team. I did raise his grade to C+.

Murphy spent most of 2007 at Pawtucket, hitting .280/.347/.423 in 100 games. In late July he was sent to the Rangers for Eric Gagne. The trade to his home state seemed to revive him; he hit .340/.382/.534 in 43 games for the Rangers. This was way beyond anything his MLEs implied he could do.

He came back to earth in 2008, hitting .275/.321/.465 in 415 at-bats, fairly close to my .260/.340/.420 "baseline talent" projection. He is a career .286/.334/.480 hitter at the major league level so far in 542 at-bats, though as he racks up more playing time, the impact of his 43-game burst with the Rangers in '07 on his stat line will gradually lessen.

What should we expect going forward? Is Murphy a good candidate for an age-27 performance spike this year? Looking at some projection systems:

PECOTA      .250/.309/.399
Shandler:      .282/.339/.469
James:           .277/.336/.450
CHONE:       .270/.330/.433
ZIPS:             .263/.319/.419

PECOTA is the least optimistic. James, unusually, is NOT the optimistic outlier this time. However, all of these projections are completely reasonable outcomes. No one seems to anticipate a performance spike beyond where he currently is.

Looking at comparable players, the top PECOTA comp is Paul O'Neill, which is intriguing given the fact that PECOTA doesn't like Murphy much for '09. Others include George Altman, Ben Broussard, Jim Northrup, Chris Richard, Brant Brown, Ricky Ledee, and Trot Nixon. Sim Scores bring up different names, Brian Giles, Rusty Greer, and Al Martin being the top three. The Greer comp is interesting: he hit .271/.355/.424, OPS+100 for the Rangers in 1995 at age 26, not far off of Murphy's .275/.321/.465/, OPS+106 mark last year. Greer broke through at age 27.

Generally, I agree with the consensus regarding 2009, though I think he's capable of adding a bit more OBP as he gains experience. Murphy should have a long career as a platoon/fourth outfielder, perhaps not living up to the expectations created by his draft status and his '07 outburst, but certainly a player with value. If he can boost his production against lefties, there's still a shot he could do something Greer-like.