Alex Gordon Crystal Ball

Gordon has made the Royals opening day roster, so this is a good day to do this one. This projection may seem optimistic, but I fully believe that he can do this if he stays healthy long enough. Think a cross between George Brett and Mark Teixeira.
Disclaimer: The Crystal Ball is an "educated opinion"...not to be taken TOO seriously and mostly for fun. I do put quite a bit of work into them, looking at similar players and trying to figure out how the guy in question might develop. Is there a fancy computer program? No. Do I just slop numbers on the page? No. It is less than a projection/prediction but more than just guesswork. The point is to stimulate discussion about the player.
0 recs |
44
comments
Comments
Wow
by Ryan Heimberger on Mar 22, 2007 12:49 PM EDT 0 recs
Only question
I could see that career path IF he stays healthy though. It's usually the injuries that derail guys like this.
by Brickhaus on
Mar 22, 2007 12:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
First ballot
The most impressive thing about this career would be the consistency - barely any decline until the last couple years.
Other things I notice:
1209 XBH's puts him comfortably in 6th on the All Time list. His XBH% is tremendous - 43% of his hits go for extra bases.
His career line (.288/.369/.526, approx) is similar to Willie Stargell's (.282/.360/.529) - very different career paths though, and less similar, but more contemporary, Scott Rolen (.285/.375/.515)
by sasquatch83 on
Mar 22, 2007 1:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Royals his entire career?
by goose102977 on Mar 22, 2007 1:03 PM EDT 0 recs
Wow
Where would this put him on a list of all time third baseman?
by Metty5 on Mar 22, 2007 1:04 PM EDT 0 recs
WOW!
by Con on Mar 22, 2007 1:09 PM EDT 0 recs
optimistic
by John Sickels on Mar 22, 2007 1:12 PM EDT 0 recs
what a bad ass
by wildthang on Mar 22, 2007 1:34 PM EDT 0 recs
Wow thats a huge CB
I love that you have him with the Royals his whole career. Even though I am a fan of an in division team I would love to see the Royals able to hang on to a player like this.... I know that the teams are just kind of guesses and secondary pieces to the puzzle though.
by VtTigers on Mar 22, 2007 1:37 PM EDT 0 recs
HOF
Brian
http://www.tigerblog.net
by Brian B on Mar 22, 2007 1:45 PM EDT 0 recs
Gordon grew up in NEB and is a royals fan
by royalsfan7 on Mar 22, 2007 1:48 PM EDT 0 recs
Big Money....
by VtTigers on
Mar 22, 2007 2:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It can, but
It is very early, but if there's any superstar the Royals will be able to hold onto, it's Gordon. Grew up a Royals fan, idolized George Brett, and really seems to want to win in KC.
That's one of the best things about Gordon and Butler. They know they're the future of Kansas City, and they're confident that they will either be the ones to turn things around or die trying. That kind of attitude is amazing to have on a team like the Royals. Combine that with new GM Dayton Moore's similar win-or-die attitude (he too grew up a Royals fan), and David Glass's newfound desire to spend a little of his hard earned Wal-Mart monies, and I think the Royals have a fighting chance to hold on to both Gordon and Butler.
And that, obviously, would be incredible. There just aren't many players that stick around with a single team their whole careers; there isn't much loyalty in the game today, just money.
Thanks for the prediction, John. Royals fans everywhere hope that you're right.
by ajohnst1 on
Mar 22, 2007 2:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
As I posted earlier
If he approaches this level in his first 6 years someone will offer him crazy money on the level of 20-25 million a year. If you want an idea of what he would get for that level of production... wait and see what contract Miguel Cabrera gets after 2009.
My point is that even as a Royals fan he will expect to be paid for his production. They won't be able to just bank on a cheap contract because of that. It still will take something in the 15-20 range per season IF he ends up like the CB.
But I digress because the CB isn't about where he goes as a player or what team he plays for.
I hope that part of it is dead on because even as a fan of a rival team I would love to see a small market team like the Royals hold on to a star.
by VtTigers on
Mar 22, 2007 3:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Except
The recent model of locking up young stars by buying out some of their arbitration years (and tacking on a team option year at the tail end)--Utley, Sizemore, Cain, McCann, etc. should apply even more to a guy like Gordon.
by Yakker on
Mar 22, 2007 4:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
We will see...
by VtTigers on
Mar 22, 2007 4:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Not that I'm disappointed
by ajohnst1 on Mar 22, 2007 2:51 PM EDT 0 recs
The real question here
by SmokeyJoeWood on Mar 22, 2007 3:03 PM EDT 0 recs
i don't mind
by cool hand Charlie on Mar 22, 2007 3:24 PM EDT 0 recs
Ballsy Call John
Dude, what's gotten in to you and your crystal balls lately? You've really been laying it all on the line for risky guys to predict like Gordon and Matsuzaka!
by NYCRoyal on Mar 22, 2007 4:31 PM EDT 0 recs
Recent CB's
Maybe John decided what the people MOST want to see is more best case scenario type Crystal Balls.
by drwmsu1 on
Mar 22, 2007 4:50 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Top 5 3rd baseman of all time
by Bravesin07 on Mar 22, 2007 4:37 PM EDT 0 recs
He's also
by Brickhaus on
Mar 22, 2007 5:55 PM EDT
up
0 recs
um....
by biggentleben on
Mar 22, 2007 11:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Ummm...
Right now, the list probably goes Schmidt, Brett, Matthews, Baker, and Santo.
by CubbieBlue66 on
Mar 23, 2007 1:42 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, if you're a hopeless Cubs homer
And Home Run Baker? That's Frank Baker, right? He of 96 career home runs??? He's not even better than Santo...let alone Chipper. What utter nonsense.
The list probably goes Schmidt, Brett, Mathews, Boggs, and Chipper (assuming a couple more productive years).
If A-Rod stays at third the rest of his career, he'll take top honors.
And if Gordon lives up to this crystal ball, he'll be in the discussion somewhere.
In 25 years, the list will look something like this: A-Rod, Schmidt, Brett, Gordon, Mathews. Heck, if this CB is true, Gordon might even be ahead of Brett. It feels so weird to say that, though...so I won't.
by ajohnst1 on
Mar 27, 2007 1:36 AM EDT
up
0 recs
before you scoff at him....
just to give you the list Bill James made after the 2000 season (which is what I refer to more than anything for historical rankings): Mike Schmidt is first, Brett second, Eddie Mathews third, Boggs fourth, Baker fifth, Santo sixth.....and Chipper Jones is 28th.
of course, Chipper's had a few more nice years since then, but his peak was definitely behind him. i would be surprised if James would rank Chipper ahead of any of those people today. and, no, James certainly DIDN'T bias the ranking against active players.
anyway, i'm not saying you're not entitled to your own opinion, but i definitely wouldn't be making fun of his if i were you....
by bleedjaxblue on
Mar 27, 2007 2:17 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah, I thought of that
Obviously, I knew when I looked at Baker's stats that he was playing in a different era. And the home run numbers are obviously NOT going to be there...but it doesn't seem like his other numbers are really there either, does it?
As for Santo and Chipper...to each his own. Chipper obviously played in a monster offensive era, but he's put up better numbers than Santo has. I'd actually argue that the biggest mark against Santo is not what he did but how long he did it for: he really only played 13-14 full seasons.
I'm not making fun, but, like you said, I'm entitled to my opinion.
by ajohnst1 on
Mar 27, 2007 11:50 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Boggs >> Chipper
by SmokeyJoeWood on
Mar 26, 2007 3:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Well...
by slurve on Mar 22, 2007 6:44 PM EDT 0 recs
Depends
He'd probably also be called up if Mike Sweeney got injured. And by if, I mean when.
He'll be up by September at the latest.
by ajohnst1 on
Mar 22, 2007 7:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Butler's D...
by KCSlayer on
Mar 22, 2007 8:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yeah
by ajohnst1 on
Mar 22, 2007 9:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think it is good, but...
by uga007 on Mar 22, 2007 9:53 PM EDT 0 recs
Wow
by Klostrophobic on Mar 23, 2007 2:11 AM EDT 0 recs
Im gonna shoot for the moon
by wildthang on Mar 23, 2007 2:31 AM EDT 0 recs
Not enough for some people, I guess....
by Lunkwill Fook on Mar 23, 2007 5:22 AM EDT 0 recs
maybeee
they think his career will look a little different?
count me in as one of the people who thinks he has a better career AVG, and steals more at the beginning of his career.
maybe some of those same people
(like me)
aren't sure he'll hit that many home runs,
or get that many RBI.
maybe it balances out.
give them their opinions back,
it's not yours.
by god allah star on
Mar 23, 2007 7:28 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Never enough
by Con on
Mar 23, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yep
I imagine that John is projecting a move from third to first (from the Teixeira reference) in Gordon's early-mid 30s.
by Mike Green on Mar 23, 2007 11:16 AM EDT 0 recs
Or from the George Brett reference
by ajohnst1 on
Mar 23, 2007 5:07 PM EDT
up
0 recs









