James Loney Crystal Ball
Question for Discussion: Does Loney develop his power further, or concentrate on batting average, or develop both into a superstardom package?
Disclaimer: The Crystal Ball is an "educated opinion"...not to be taken TOO seriously and mostly for fun. I do put quite a bit of work into them, looking at similar players and trying to figure out how the guy in question might develop. Is there a fancy computer program? No. Do I just slop numbers on the page? No. It is less than a projection/prediction but more than just guesswork.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
Looks like...
by Gudy2Shoes on
Feb 14, 2007 4:30 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
some injuries, some great years
by benaiah on
Feb 14, 2007 5:07 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
My opinion
by royalsfan7 on
Feb 14, 2007 5:21 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Loney
I agree with Benaiah, Loney has considerable power potential. Seeing him in the majors last year, two things were made clear, Loney has superb plate-coverage and he always hits the ball hard. He worked a 1-2 count against Jason Schmidt last year full, saw about 6-7 pitches total, and pulled a 94mph fastball on the outside corner nearly into McCovey cove. It was a monster blast - not something you see from the Doug Mientkiewicz's of the world.
Loney doesn't really lack power, he gets plenty of extrabase hits - he lacks homeruns. I think the paucity of HR's in his track record is a reflection of his approach (he just doesn't look for homeruns pitches, he's looks for pitches he can drive into the gaps and up the middle) rather than a lack of HR-power. If he can look for HR pitches more often, without sacrificing his contact rate or batting average he'll be an allstar.
by sanchez101 on
Feb 14, 2007 5:29 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
You know who this comps close to?
http://www.baseball-reference.com/g/garvest01.shtml
spooky...
by kings33 on
Feb 14, 2007 6:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
IMO
by Brickhaus on
Feb 14, 2007 8:40 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Why?
by sanchez101 on
Feb 14, 2007 10:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Because
by Brickhaus on
Feb 15, 2007 9:55 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I See...
by CanuckDodger on
Feb 15, 2007 10:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2015?
by dlpme77 on
Feb 14, 2007 8:51 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Garvey comparison
Nice touch to return Looney to Houston for a spell, too.
by C on
Feb 14, 2007 10:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
reminds me of paul oneill
by realityconquest on
Feb 15, 2007 12:54 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
definitely like the projections
All in all, that's a great career Loney has, and I think it's a pretty accurate projection. The funny thing is, as you mention, he could develop a lot more power or hit for a much higher batting average than you project for him; at the same time, your "balanced" projections likely give him a career in the 90th to 95th percentile of his range.
The only thing I might suggest is that he will strike out even less than you have him doing. Last year, in both the majors, he looked pretty impossible to get a pitch by, even at the season's start (and the year's worth of Triple-A stats -- 34 Ks in 366 ABs as a 21-year-old -- show it too). Even the 10 Ks in the majors were mostly against tough relievers as Grady Little tried his damnedest to completely misuse Loney for the month of September. Still, it's a minor quibble, and I think Loney would be blessed to have a career as long and as steadily productive as this one. I just hope the Dodgers sign him to an extension that you don't foresee.
by bleedjaxblue on
Feb 15, 2007 1:09 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
2021
by JRB on
Feb 15, 2007 10:00 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
2007
by SethSpeaks on
Feb 15, 2007 1:20 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Nomar Injury
by FlipYrWhig on
Feb 15, 2007 10:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sweet
by coreyt on
Feb 16, 2007 12:42 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not A Superstar
by CanuckDodger on
Feb 16, 2007 1:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
too little
So I would say that we could expect 375 homers, 1500 RBI's, .385 OBP and 5 or 6 all-star appearances.
by Sage Sam on
Feb 19, 2007 12:27 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs








