Stuff
Upcoming Teams:
Los Angeles Dodgers
Seattle Mariners
Milwaukee Brewers
Oakland Athletics
Philadelphia Phillies
The prospect lists bring in a lot of new readers, many asking what the grades mean. Here is the rundown.
GRADES AND WHAT THEY MEAN
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
Could you explain maybe a little bit more..
by cubsfan2883 on Dec 17, 2007 12:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
under this guideline...
by ScottAZ on Dec 17, 2007 2:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Its a question of positional scarcity, really
but lets just say Lowrie could put up his AA line from this year in the majors at some point(by no means a lock and im not claiming he will!).
.297/.410/.501 911OPS
Now, where would that put him among MLB SS? By OPS it would put him 2nd, right below Hanley and above Jimmy Rollins... and he's a more patient hitter than those two.
Now, even if we account for a dropoff in performance... lets drop him 100 points of OPS. He'd still be around 6th in MLB by OPS, above Tejada... If true, that's an A- player, and his ceiling is very tempting.
by alskor on Dec 17, 2007 2:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
by CrimsonLiederhosen on Dec 18, 2007 11:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
can't wait until the dodgers
by Bravesin07 on Dec 17, 2007 6:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks John
I understand that a B- would be someplace in between an B and a C. But I'm still trying to figure out what the difference between a C+ and a B- would be.
I'm probably totally speaking out of turn here and also raising a suggestion that isn't even close to new, but wouldn't a system that went A, A/B, B, B/C etc. make things a bit easier?
Then again, that probably doesn't provide enough room for differentiation.
by Einsteinhood on Dec 17, 2007 9:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs










