2007 San Francisco Giants Prospects

2007 San Francisco Giants Prospects
- Tim Lincecum, RHP, Grade A (terrific)
- Jonathan Sanchez, LHP, Grade B (a solid pitcher if he stays healthy)
- Marcus Sanders, 2B, Grade B (this assumes that his shoulder injury was the cause of his problems last year. I am not certain of this grade and am open to arguments either way).
- Billy Sadler, RHP, Grade B- (I like him best of all the middle relief candidates)
- Kevin Frandsen, 2B, Grade B- (is this too high?)
- Eddy Martinez-Esteve, OF, Grade B- (this assumes good health)
- Emmanuel Burriss, SS, Grade B- (borderline C+ but draft status boosts him a bit)
- Fred Lewis, OF, Grade C+ (I like him better than this grade implies but he's getting old for a prospect)
- Nate Schierholtz, OF, Grade C+ (I keep going back and forth on this guy)
- Travis Ishikawa, 1B, Grade C+ (Good glove, mediocre bat for a first baseman)
- Brian Wilson, RHP, C+ (another middle relief candidate)
- Brian Anderson, RHP, C+ (another middle relief candidate)
- Eugenio Velez, OF, C+ (added to 40-man roster after strong '06 but already 24)
- Ben Copeland, OF, C+ (possible fourth outfielder eventually, perhaps should be grade C)
- Osiris Matos, RHP, C+ (another middle relief candidate)
- Clayton Tanner, LHP, C+ (young pitcher a long way away)
- Antoan Richardson, OF, C+ (speed demon but can he hit at higher levels?)
- Justin Hedrick, RHP, C (another middle relief candidate)
- Joseph Martinez, RHP, C (good control)
- Jesse Floyd, RHP, C (interchangeable with guys below)
Young pitchers Pichardo and Pucetas are being considered for the Top 20; this is all a work in progress.
The Giants in a Sentence: The Giants have some interesting relief arms after Lincecum and Sanchez, but have shown little ability to develop hitters with plate discipline or plus offensive potential.
This list took forever and it is really not done yet, but I wanted to get it out there since it is already late. There is a large mass of Grade C type guys who are marginal prospects or just too far away to tell for sure. The only guy I'm really certain about at all is Lincecum, which is a no-brainer. I like Sanchez a lot, but all the other guys have at least one question mark and in some cases several. Injuries were also a huge issue. I may also be too generous with some of those C+ grades and some of them may get reduced to regular Cs later on.
Note: Remember that ALL GRADES ARE PRELIMINARY. There is a lot of slack in the B-/C+/C range and players may move up and down depending on how my thinking progresses. Feel free to make comments, point out sleepers I may have missed, etc. Note that there is only a limited amount of space in the book, and the max I can do is 35-36 players per team.
Of course, the best thing you can do is buy my book
0 recs |
163 comments
Comments
re
by bootsy on
Nov 26, 2006 6:31 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
yep
by PooNani on
Nov 26, 2006 6:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah as good as Lincecum
by Havok1517 on
Nov 26, 2006 7:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
94 MPH
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
drB
by z4 landshark on
Nov 26, 2006 8:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lincecum
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lincecum
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lincecum
by slurve on
Nov 27, 2006 8:04 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Size
Remember Pedro was shipped off in one of the worst trades in baseball history because Tommy Lasorda thought he was too small to be a decent starter.
by Roger on
Nov 27, 2006 11:48 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cowart?
Also, Adam Witter?
by nostocksjustbonds on
Nov 26, 2006 6:40 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm not a pacifist, I'm a...
Personally, I wanted to see McBryde in the top 20. BA went sorta bonkers over him a couple weeks ago, and he does seem to be totally injury free, not to mention tool-laden.
by multiphasic on
Nov 26, 2006 7:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cowart
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:59 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cowart's delivery
I do think that he could make it as a starter if he gets to the majors, a la Reuter. He'll definitely be interesting to follow. Does he start 2007 in San Jose, Augusta or...Connecticut? I'm guessing San Jose, but sometimes I can't tell how they decide those things.
by nostocksjustbonds on
Nov 26, 2006 10:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cowart, Witter and McBryde
When he comes set, he's bent over at the waist, almost like he's in a three-point stance in football, but his left leg is halfway down the mound. He lifts the foot barely, doing practically a toe-tap, and then he pushes off with his rear leg. The motion is a true underhand, dirt-scraping with the knuckles.
He probably has no more power to gain off his pitching unless he does a real change to his motion, but then he may lose his control.
I agree that he probably won't be an effective starter at the highest levels, but with his motion, his superb control and his ability to throw a couple of pitches with consistency, he's a very intriguing relief prospect. And I wouldn't say never about the starting.
Witter: I didn't get to see much of him. Natural power swing, though it's not heavily projectible. I've heard reports that his defense is lacking, but unlike Sandoval before him, the Giants don't plan to move him elsewhere.
McBryde: The funny thing is, he might be a better reliever than an outfielder. But he's a very good outfielder with plus defense and speed tools, and solid enough hitting. He'll probably never become a power guy, but he's not the type who needs to be to be successful. He will have to stave off lingering doubts about his legs and health after missing most of 2006's college year with a severe Hamstring injury.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:13 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Valdez?
How does the TJ surgery effect his roster standing?
by Bhaakon on
Nov 26, 2006 6:46 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Daniel Griffin
by tupelodylan on
Nov 26, 2006 6:50 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
griffin
by John Sickels on
Nov 26, 2006 7:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry, John
I know Whitaker pulled an oblique very early in the year. He came back briefly then, according to a knowledgeable source over on mccoveychronicles.com, he developed some kind of elbow problem and had surgery. Must not have been TJ because he's supposed to be ready for spring training. I'm not sure non-TJ elbow surgery is reassuring. As raw as Whitaker is, he can ill afford to lose development time to multiple injuries. Not ready to say he's a bust, but he's skating darn close to the edge.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 8:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Griffin
However, since a lot of Griffin's upside depends on his curve, any injury will be very, very impactful on his rating.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:15 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good Job!
IMO, you are being generous with the C+'s. Thank you.
I would rank Frandsen higher, not lower.
I would probably rank Burris higher.
I would probably put Schoop in the top 20, more by default than anything.
Craig Whitaker and Dan Griffin are two injuries that could come back strong, but very iffy.
I know Angel Villalona has not played yet, but just reading the tea leaves, a top Dominican prospect, high signing bonus, Scott Boras throwing dust in the air..........I would rank him #2 just because everyone else below Lincecum is just so bad.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 6:57 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed on Frandsen
by StickRat on
Nov 26, 2006 8:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Toronto or San Francisco?
by Jurgen on
Nov 26, 2006 6:59 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
toronto
I just dont know if Ricky Romero has what it takes to be a starter in the majors. Maybe, a reliever..?
by z4 landshark on
Nov 26, 2006 8:10 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, but...
by Jurgen on
Nov 26, 2006 10:21 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
EME
by cinqua on
Nov 26, 2006 8:49 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
No way
by Jurgen on
Nov 26, 2006 10:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
EME
If Manny Ramirez can play left field for an AL team, EME's defense is nothing that makes him a so-called 'AL Player.'
His health is the more pertinent issue, and how he'll come back from labrum surgery is a big deal. That said, he came back from labrum surgery on his throwing shoulder in 2005 and had a very good year, so coming back from the labrum surgery on his non-throwing shoulder this year, with more time in the offseason to rest, shouldn't be a problem.
As a hitter, he's one of the best I've seen in the Giants system. Very good pitch recognition, sweet swing, solid power that can grow with health. I think a C+ is a low ranking on him.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:19 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nathan Pendley
by StickRat on
Nov 26, 2006 8:54 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Lefty Relievers
The Giants drafted a whole bunch of lefty reliever types in 2006. Paul Oseguera, from UCLA, had a rough start at Salem-Keizer, but turned in some spectacular strikeout numbers in August. Ryan Paul got a late start due to the College World Series with CS Fullerton, but he's another big lefty. He had a high ERA, but that was inflated by a couple of terrible outings from what I remember. He had some very good outings too. Steve Calicutt is another LHRP who pitched pretty well for S-K.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dr B. ...
I've been impressed with Quinowski's numbers. Haven't seen him pitch yet. It's tough to believe if he's pumping 95 that he'd still be an unknown, but stranger things have happen. I don't know how many people were raving about Brian Wilson a year or two ago. I really like Oseguera. He had a pretty heavy workload at UCLA, appearing in 29 games. I saw Ryan Paul in college. Not terribly impressed. Good velocity but he needs to rub some funk on it.
by StickRat on
Nov 26, 2006 9:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd Love It
I'm a teetotler so I'll have a coke while you have your beer. How's that?
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sounds like a plan
by StickRat on
Nov 27, 2006 5:10 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Quinowski
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Redlands High/Riverside CC
Riverside CC is a perenial baseball power, and went through College Of San Mateo to win its last state championship. Both Scott Feldman and Mike Mooney played for that CSM team.
by StickRat on
Nov 28, 2006 2:14 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
EME's health
by philly on
Nov 26, 2006 8:56 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Move them all down
by RMF on
Nov 26, 2006 8:59 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
B+?
I agree that most of the C+'s are too high. The problem with the Giants system is that it's very hard to figure out which ones are too high and whch ones aren't. Most of these kids have some upside which could surprise a lot of folks. On the other hand, most of them have significant warts too.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 26, 2006 9:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What is the ETA on
by NYYLover1000 on
Nov 26, 2006 10:35 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
tim
by z4 landshark on
Nov 27, 2006 1:16 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lincecum
by doublestix on
Nov 26, 2006 10:19 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Cal League parity
And this "hitters league" really didn't have any hitters in the league...
(Baseball America said in their write up that the "depth of talent was severely lacking", then cites these as the best hitters: Reid Brignac, Carlos Gonzalez, Travis Buck, Jonathan Herrera and Emilio Bonifacio)
...and much fewer during the time Lincecum was actually there.
From Aug. 1 to the end of the year:
Brignac was in AA
Gonzalez was in A+ for 37 AB's in AUG (never against Lincecum)
Buck was on the DL in AA
Herrera was there, but no ABs v. Lincecum
Bonifacio was there, but again not even 1 AB v. Lincecum
Now I do understand that it's a "hitters league" because hitters tend to put up better numbers there...It's still A+ and the hitters probably can't keep up with a high end fastball with other pitches to compliment it.
John, I would wait to see him play some ball at AA and put up more than 100 IP against a league before we just give a guy an A rating (There's no way he deserves the highest rating you can give a player based on these low numbers). A- may be too high as well, I can see it though with all the excitement about him.
by phiago on
Nov 26, 2006 11:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lincecum
I love Lincecum and he's got as much potential as anyone, but honestly, isn't his best-case scenario for him next year what Matt Garza did this year? And wouldn't that be fairly extraordinarily rare outside of Garza?
I can't see Lincecum at a straight A and Garza at an A-. If you ask me, it should be the other way around.
by limozeen on
Nov 26, 2006 10:47 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Well...
What a crappy system. Didn't they sign some guy last year from the Dominican with a 98 MPH fastball and a sick slider? What happened to him?
by SenorGato88 on
Nov 26, 2006 11:26 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Waldis Joaquin
by Derelict on
Nov 26, 2006 11:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Schierholtz
by Savoy on
Nov 26, 2006 11:42 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Schierholtz
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 27, 2006 1:27 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Schierholtz
He dealt with hand issues starting in May, and that plagued him most of the summer, but he came back with a strong August that made his overall numbers passable.
But then, he had a poor HWB stint, albeit in a league that heavily leaned towards pitchers.
Schierholtz has awesome power but the concern was his strikeout numbers. To Schierholtz's credit, he dealt with them and focused on improving in Double-A, and in a pitchers league, dropped his K rate considerably although his power did suffer.
I think he's one of the best hitting prospects in the Giants system, but he's obviously not perfect. He's prone to slumps and has had injury issues, albeit he's played through them.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:25 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dodgers and Mariners!!
by RollingWave on
Nov 27, 2006 12:40 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Response
The only pitching prospects who are clearly superior to him in my mind are Hughes and (if eligible) Garza. Bailey may be better but it's a very competitive comparison. It wouldn't be surprising at all if Lincecum proves to be the best of them all.
by mrkupe on
Nov 27, 2006 2:51 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
My thoughts
I do think Wilson isn't just a middle relief candidate, but is a closer candidate and a very good one. He has the so-called stuff, but he also has the mentality.
I wonder if it's telling that two of the top three pitchers in this list (the ones not named Lincecum) are ones with very consistent control issues, and if that doesn't rank as high of a red flag for John as it does for me? I'm still very hesitant on Sanchez, myself.
It is nice to see Hedrick and Martinez get some recognition.
However, if I had one thing I'd argue about on John's list, it's Frandsen. B-??? Come on. No, he doesn't have the 'potential' that a lot people want to find on lists, but what he does have is no small bit of skills, and what's more important, he gets the most out of them, and has done so consistently. He may never be an All-Star, but he will give some team a strong performance at second base, with good doubles power and be a threat on the basepaths, and he'll play better defense than he showed this past year.
I truly believe that, even if he doesn't have the 'potential', Frandsen will have a much more successful career than 2/3rds of this list. And I could probably run that up to 3/4ths.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 3:34 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Tim Lincecum's Durability
Go to www.calleaguers.com and click on Tim Lincecum to see a 41-second clip of Timmy pitching against Cal this spring. Look at the incredible pushoff he gets from the rubber. It is said to be the best since Nolan Ryan. Look at how he uses his whole body when he pitches, reducing the strain on his arm.
Go to dectovision.com and click on POTD pitchers at the bottom right of the home page. Then click on Tim Lincecum and then Tim Lincecum mechanics to see how exceptional Timmy's mechanics truly are.
Timmy has never missed a start or even had a sore arm. In his two-hit, 18-strikeout shutout over UCLA this spring, he threw 146 pitches. Pitch #146 was delivered at 95 mph. The following day Timmy was viewed easily playing long toss from foul pole to foul pole.
Timmy has never thrown an inning above High A, but in his regular-season professional career, he has struck out 58 batters while allowing only 14 hits. That's a ratio of 4.14. We're talking only Class A here, but the best career major-league record for K/H is 1.51 by Randy Johnson. The single-season record is 2.22 by Pedro Martinez in 2000. The Giants single-season record is 1.52 by Jason Schmidt in 2004. Beginning to get the idea that Timmy strikes out a lot of batters and is pretty hard to hit?
Timmy isn't perfect by any means. His control needs work. It doesn't appear his fastball has the hop that Matt Cain's does, which means he may give up more homers than Matt. But his fastball has touched 101 and he consistently throws it in the 94-97 range. His waterfall curve ball comes in 15-20 mph slower and has a tremendous 11-5 break. While both pitches are rated plus-plus, the curve is Timmy's best pitch. Timmy is also said to throw a changeup, slider and knuckleball, but he's been pretty much a two-pitch pitcher as a professional.
Timmy's pitching at San Jose in the California League has been compared to Danny Almonte's pitching in the Little League World Series, so two pitches may be all he needs.
The most pitches Timmy has thrown in a professional game was 94, when he opened the California League Northern Championship series. The pitch was a high, outside fastball at 96 mph that was swung on and missed. Timmy went seven innings, also his longest professional stint in innings.
If not for a dropped third strike, he would have been out of the seventh inning after only 84 pitches, although he more typically averages about 16 pitches per inning. In that particular game Timmy was more efficient than dominant. He yielded five hits, walked one and struck out "only" 10.
One observer has nicknamed Timmy "The Future." For Giants fans frustrated with the team's lack of position players at present, that's a pretty apt nickname. Timmy also has been called the "Freak of Nature" and "Seabiscuit." To relieve tension he does back flips or walks on his hands.
Timmy's dad, who taught Timmy his motion and whose own motion is said to have been indistinguishable from Timmy's was once clocked at 88 mph -- when he was 55 years old. Likely beginning sometime next season Timmy should be relieving (as a starter) the growing tension of Giants fans. With his solid mechanics, he should be doing so for a long, long time.
If he still throws 88 mph at age 55 as his dad Chris did, he could be Livan Hernandez 33 years from now.
Those of you who are worried about Tim Lincecum's future durability shouldn't be. It seems to run in his family.
by sharksrog on
Nov 27, 2006 3:59 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
cool family
Seriously, since I don't know much at all about the Giants farm system, I have enjoyed reading the comments, especially the debates about Lincecum. Let's all hope he stays healthy and can reward baseball fans for years to come.
by Savoy on
Nov 27, 2006 9:25 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Brute and Shark
Love the story about Timmy's dad. Sounds like Tim is already collecting a few nicknames. Over at MacChron they're calling him Tim the Enchanter. Wonder which one is going to stick?
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 27, 2006 9:30 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks, DrB
Hopefully, next year will be a better year for Giants prospects than this year was, with most of the top guys suffering injuries and slumps.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 7:09 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll have to disagree
First off, Garza started 2006 in High-A which is the same level that Lincecum dominated in 2006. He was in the pitcher friendly FSL and posted a 1.42 ERA with a 5.48 H/9, 2.23 BB/9, and 10.76 K/9 in 44.1 innings.
Let's examine Lincecum last year in High-A in a hitter's league (it's the park factors just as much as the talent, so don't give me the BS that some guys were promoted to AA). Including the postseason, Lincecum posted a 1.81 ERA with a 4.67 H/9, 3.37 BB/9, and 15.05 K/9 in 34.2 innings.
Besides the walk rate, which was respectable, Lincecum dominated High-A and put up a far superior K/9 while allowing a hit less per 9 than Garza.
Based on that information and my opinion after watching both guys pitch that Lincecum's FB/CB combo is better than anything Garza brings to the table.... it's safe to assume that Lincecum is already just as good of a pitcher as Garza.
If the Giants wanted Lincecum in the majors to start 2007, I'm pretty sure he would put up respectable numbers.
Also note how major leaguers ripped Garza's stuff apart. His H/9 ballooned to 11 while his K/9 dropped below 7 and his BB/9 raised over 4... that means you're hittable and not dominant.
Lincecum's upside seems higher than Garza's and I'd be the first to bet that his 2007 season will be better than Garza's 2006 season.
by youALREADYknow on
Nov 27, 2006 11:33 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Rumors
by Metty5 on
Nov 27, 2006 3:14 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
no
by youALREADYknow on
Nov 27, 2006 3:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Matt Palmer
Just wondering if anyone knows anything about Palmer so I have some ammo to smack back at him. :)
by The Colonel on
Nov 27, 2006 4:30 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Matt Palmer
At 27, that's old for any prospect. It's harsh, but hell, there are some people on sites like this who think 23 is old to be major league rookies. Those people are foolish morons, but it's an example of how age affects how people see things.
To be more reasonable...Palmer had a spectacular year in Connecticut, but it was the 4th year he'd been in Double-A. It's expected that when you repeat a level, you do better there, and he's been repeating (and yes, improving) at double-A since 2003.
Also, a reliever who repeats levels is often viewed with suspicion. Palmer was a reliever until this year, the first year since his pro debut that he was primarily a starter. Why didn't he move up to Triple-A before then?
The answer to that: injuries. I'm afraid I don't know what afflicted Palmer in 2005, but he missed a significant portion of the season. It is nice to see he came back, though.
And, finally, his numbers in Fresno, while good for the league, are not mind-blowing good numbers.
That's not to say Palmer doesn't deserve credit for what he did. He stepped in for Sanchez in the rotation in Double-A and dominated. And he finally made a push to get higher in the system. That's no small thing, and his numbers in Fresno were solid.
But he doesn't have any one overwhelming major league pitch, nor does he have the plus plus control that a major leaguer with no great pitches would need to survive.
Palmer's got an outside shot of becoming a major leaguer, most likely in a long/middle relief role. But he's not the type of player that should make the tops in a list like this.
He did fairly well on my list.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 7:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Linc
He wasn't just good this year. He was dominant and absolutely over matched hitters at A+. That was just the start.
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 4:41 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
The odds are stacked
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 4:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So what?
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 4:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There is no evidence
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 5:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nowadays
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 5:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay,,,
...then look at the former starting pitchers that have turned relievers with same size and similar stuff. I think you'll find more similarities here.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 5:29 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
How many are there?
The fact that there are a few glaring success stories is what stands out in my mind. Oswalt, Hudson, and Pedro. That's arguably 3 out of the top 10 pitchers of the last six or seven years. Peavy is roughly that size, and Kazmir is pretty close. Maybe that points to only 4-8 years of ace-level stuff, but again, its a small sample size.
I'm sure there are a bunch of guys who got hurt or didn't work out, but I could make a list a mile-long of 6'5" 220 pounders in the same boat.
by hammystyle on
Nov 27, 2006 6:26 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Linc is listed at
There are roughly 150 starting pitchers in the MLB and there are only 9 starting pitchers (mlb.com) in the entire MLB that are listed under 6'0 tall, though teams sites aren't always accurate. It has been rumored for years that Pedro is more like 5'9. Many guys including Lincecum might actually be smaller than listed and I think he's about 5'8-5'9 like Pedro.
M Hampton 5'10 195 90 mph fastball
B Colon 5'11 250 97-98 mph (not a small frame)
W Rodriquez 5'11 160 92 mph fastball
C Gaudin 5'11 165 94 mph fastball
G Chacin 5'11 195 92 mph fastball
P Martinez 5'11 180 96 mph fastball
C Hensley 5'11 190 92 mph fastball
I Snell 5'11 190 96 mph fastball
G Perkins 5'10 195 94 mph fastball
T Lincecum 5'10 160 98-100 mph fastball
So, according to team listings only 6% of the the 150 starting pitchers in baseball are under 6 feet tall and none of these pitchers except maybe Snell, Colon, and the Pedro of old can/could dial it up over 95 consistently, which makes it only 3 of the 150 (2%) pitchers in baseball under 6'0 that routinely throw it over 95 mph. Take Colon out because he obviously has a hefty body type and that leaves 2 pitchers out of the 150 (1.3%).
To clarify, only 1.3% of current major league starting pitchers are similar to Lincecum in terms of size, stuff, and frame. Now, Oswalt and a few other guys might actually be under 6'0 feet tall but that same rule should be applied to those SPs that are listed under 6'0 by their teams. Many of those guys, including Lincecum and Pedro could easily be smaller than their already small listings. That still doesn't take away the large injury risk associated with pitchers similar to Lincecum (even though he has not has any history). He also has not pitched much more than 40 innings as a pro and his arm certainly hasn't faced the rigors of an entire MLB season.
There are far more comparable pitchers to Lincecum currently pitching and excelling in relief like Tom Gordon & Billy Wagner. I like Lincecum starting as long as he is able to pitch with the velocity he has shown but any decline there and his effectiveness diminishes. I like the guy a lot as he is now but I have to count the numbers against him.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 8:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This post proves nothing
by slurve on
Nov 27, 2006 8:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It proves that
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 9:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Injury Risk?
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 27, 2006 10:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
that would take too much time
Small List of current pitchers similar in stature with an injury history...
Pedro
Hampton
Oswalt
Kazmir
Chacin
Fossum
Hudson
Gordon
Wagner
Rivera
Street
Find one current regular starting pitcher with similar size that hasn't had an injured past.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 11:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Size to a pitcher frame makes a difference but:
by NYYLover1000 on
Nov 27, 2006 11:40 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mark Prior
This is a fact:
There is no current MLB starter that has the same body type, stature, and stuff that Lincecum does. There are barely any pitchers in major league baseball that are as small as Lincecum is without the stuff. But there are a few major league RPs that do. Maybe Lincecum is a throwback to the starting pitchers of old but I wouldn't bet on it.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 11:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Thjat would take too much time"
That list again proves nothing. Nada, zero, zip. I can list medium sized pitchers or larger pitchers that have had injuries all day. I doesn't mean their size has/had anything to with injury. I can also list a bunch of pitchers that were born on Thursday with injury histories. It doesn't prove anything that links high injury risk to what day of the week you were born.
by slurve on
Nov 28, 2006 12:49 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I concur
by yoda1 on
Nov 28, 2006 1:11 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pitch Count
Timmy DID throw 146 pitches in his two-hit, 18-strikeout shutout of UCLA, but he threw pitch #146 at 95 mph. Even more impressive, he was seen comfortably throwing long toss from foul pole to foul pole the following day.
by sharksrog on
Nov 28, 2006 5:00 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I listed some
I proved that Lincecum is in the vast minority of MLB starters and in a league of his own in terms of velocity assosciated with his size amongst starters. There is no current starter that throws as hard as he does for his size, period. Whether that means he will suffer arm issues after not having any whatsoever I don't know. But a small guy throwing that hard over the course of a major league season doesn't bode well in my mind.
The 4 best case scenario pitchers comparable to Lincecum are Pedro, Oswalt, Gordon, & Wagner and all 4 have had numerous injuries. Pedro and Oswalt have had a lot of injuries and they don't throw as hard! Also, the only 2 to match Lincecum in velocity is Wagner and Gordon (converted starter), both RPs and both injury risks. People can take it as they want but Lincecum is an anomaly among current starters and that is a fact.
If I had to predict Lincecum's future I'd say he is an excellent to good starter for 4 or 5 years then has serious arm injuries and becomes a successful closer for many years after that. Maybe he becomes a stud starter for 20 years and I change my tune but that would come with no precedent for a guy his size, frame, and velocity.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 1:25 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
pitchers have injuries
by slurve on
Nov 28, 2006 2:33 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
4-5 years?
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 28, 2006 9:16 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't think
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 11:46 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pedro Martinez did it...
He had horrible mechanics though, the way he violently ended his delivery messed with his hip and his shoulders alot.
by SenorGato88 on
Nov 28, 2006 11:57 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pedro
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 12:03 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pedro
by yoda1 on
Nov 28, 2006 1:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 4:37 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OMG!!!
"I think its dumb to compare Lincecum to a future hall of famer."
....please meet....
Pedro
Hampton
Oswalt
Kazmir
Chacin
Fossum
Hudson
Gordon
Wagner
Rivera
Street
You have no problem tossing Pedro's name out there to show how small guys get hurt, then you claim sacrilege when someone else uses Pedro as a comp.
by slurve on
Nov 29, 2006 12:28 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sure I can
Lincecum mirroring Pedro's hall of fame career (btw Pedro will be the only righty since before WWII to be under 6'0 and be in the HoF) or Lincecum mirroring Pedro's injury history?
The choice is easily injury history when having to choose between the 2 options that would happen most likely. Unless, you're saying Linc will be a hall of famer, which I doubt you are.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 30, 2006 3:22 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No dipshit
What was said: "remember when Pedro was throwing 95+ consistently?"
and...
"(Pedro) worked in the upper 90s during his peak."
To that you say it's stupid to compare Lincecum and Pedro. In term of a smaller pitcher throwing hard - that was the comp and you yourself used it, then you try to discredit someone else using it by say we're talking about Lincecum putting up like numbers.
by slurve on
Dec 1, 2006 11:48 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's not wrong!!!!
HELLOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
YOU DID THE SAME F'N THING YOURSELF!!!!!
by slurve on
Dec 1, 2006 12:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No
I backed up what I said and my logic to support my opinion on Linc.
by Havok1517 on
Dec 1, 2006 12:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Linc
by Havok1517 on
Dec 1, 2006 12:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
huh
Please stop with the 5'11 who throw 100mph. Because that is not Timmy's working speed.
by playingwithfire on
Dec 1, 2006 9:08 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
for 1
by Havok1517 on
Dec 2, 2006 5:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lincecum's Build
by DrBGiantsfan on
Dec 2, 2006 7:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've met Tim for an interview...
He's no shorter than 5'10, and I'd say he's 5'11 even. I know people under 5'10, and he is clearly NOT under 5'10.
Judging height by pictures of a guy on the mound is a lot like trying to judge someone's hat size by looking at a picture of them in a helmet...it's 'clearly' not accurate.
by BruteSentiment on
Dec 5, 2006 6:42 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank you
by slurve on
Dec 2, 2006 7:27 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No you are not the only one
by yoda1 on
Dec 5, 2006 12:59 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Horrible mechanics
by Roger on
Nov 28, 2006 6:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
4-5 Excellent Years
by Roger on
Nov 29, 2006 9:35 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He doesn't know why either
by slurve on
Nov 29, 2006 12:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There is no evidence
If not for Timmy's great motion, flexibility, conditioning and history, I too would be worried. But the more I have studied Timmy, the less likely I think he is to become injured. He indeed appears to be "Seabiscuit" and a "Freak of Nature."
by sharksrog on
Nov 28, 2006 4:44 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
retarded
I can see undervaluing Lirano because of his injury concerns or being skeptical about Matt Cain because he had problems early but Lincecum has never had an injury. Never. How can we say that he is an injury risk? Its not like he is 17 or anything either. He is 22 and has never missed any time due to injury.
Ya know... I am a little concerned about Phillip Hughes because apparently his great great uncle on his father's side had a nasty opium addiction and I think we can all say that due to that history he should probably be a B- prospect.
by caintastic on
Nov 27, 2006 6:02 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
common sense
Until he goes down with any significant arm injury, the injury talk is a load of BS. Unless you are the almighty God or whatever particular deity (if any) you believe in, you have absolutely NO PSYCHIC ABILITY to predict an injury out of nowhere.
Francisco Liriano, Adam Miller, Nick Adenhart, and more have gone through TJ surgery and people seemingly ignore their injury risk and would not hesitate to rank them among baseball's top pitchers.
When Lincecum gets injured, we'll cross that bridge. Until then, you can't hold your insignificant hunches against him.
by youALREADYknow on
Nov 27, 2006 6:35 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Just fyi
by Havok1517 on
Nov 27, 2006 6:51 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thanks
It still doesn't disprove the point I was making though, he was a guy who had a major arm injury.
by youALREADYknow on
Nov 27, 2006 6:56 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's funny
by yoda1 on
Nov 27, 2006 7:00 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Injury possibilities
The point about Tim's father was kind of breezed by.
What he taught Lincecum wasn't just mechanics, it was a philosophy. The philosophy was that flexibility is everything to a pitcher's health and ability. An ESPN Mag article this summer related that most pitchers arm motions result in the body trying to throw the ball, and that the motion of the arm essentially results in the arm being pushed away from the body, fraying tendons and connections. That's what causes injuries.
So what Tim's father taught Tim was physics, not strength. Tim uses his body to put as much momentum as possible into his throwing motion. The result is that his pitching is much more akin to him slinging the ball as if from a slingshot rather than push it like a shot put.
His pitching motion is unlike any other, so basing injury expectations on others who don't use the motion makes little sense. To re-quote Hammy, "How many are there?"
Find me pitchers who have used the same motion as Lincecum and who have had major injury problems, and I'll consider that Lincecum might become an injury case. Otherwise, I won't project anyone else's injury history onto a player who has none.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 7:24 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Confident?
Yes, Tim Lincecum is an injury risk. So is Matt Cain, Felix Hernandez, Justin Verlander and any other pitcher you can think of. I do think the higher velocity and greater break on breaking pitches SLIGHTLY increases risk due to more stress on the arm. Until somebody can show me a statistic, I don't think size has much, if anything to do with it.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 27, 2006 8:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If he's a pitcher, he's an injury risk
That said, does someone who reads BP know if Carroll has weighed in on the Lincecum debate? I can think of no man around that I think is more of an authority on health of baseball players. What he says would be an opinion I'd trust.
I'd almost buy a BP subscription just to read his column.
by BruteSentiment on
Nov 27, 2006 10:15 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Will Carroll
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 27, 2006 10:17 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
from today's BP chat:
Q: Will, there has been a lot of talk about how Tim Lincecum's size is a big negative because it makes him an injury risk. While it make sense from a physics point of view, Has there been any study that links pitcher size to injury risk? Thanks
Will Carroll: No study I'm aware of. I'd love, love, love to see Lincecum in a high-speed study to see just how much stress he's putting on his joints. Odds of that happening are roughly that of me hanging out with supermodels. (Wait, I do that.) Actually, I'd like to see EVERY pitcher, especially the minor leaguers, have this type of study. Given the contracts being handed out now, the costs of these type of things become an even smaller percentage of payroll and potentially more valuable.
by irwin on
Nov 29, 2006 11:24 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This May Seem Strange
By the way, when you go to calleaguers.com and click on Tim Lincecum to see video of his motion, go to scouting reports at that same site. Go to 2005 and to the San Jose Giants. Then look at the scouting report on Jonathan Sanchez (who pitched at San Jose in 2005). At the bottom of the scouting report is a 20-second-or-so video of Jonathan.
Look at his video and at Timmy's and tell me that Timmy doesn't look like less of an injury risk than Jonathan, as much as I like the slender southpaw.
by sharksrog on
Nov 28, 2006 4:53 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Tim's curve appears to come off nice
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 11:45 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 12:04 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is it?
by yoda1 on
Nov 28, 2006 4:34 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
much more dumb
Clemens has long said the reason he's been able to pitch as long as he's been able to is because of workouts he's put his body through and the build up of his legs. Lincecum is tiny and nothing anyone can say can change that.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 6:14 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Small
I've read every single one of your posts and have yet to find anything in even one of them that links size of pitcher to injury risk. It's real simple. Give us a study that compares pitcher's size with injury risk that shows that correlation or give it up already. Sheesh!!
BTW. As I've said before, yes, Tim Lincecum is an injury risk. He's a friggin' pitcher for crying out loud.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 28, 2006 7:05 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No studies
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 7:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And by the way...
by yoda1 on
Nov 28, 2006 7:27 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Check this out!
In my eyes, its the combination of Lincecum's short stature, small frame, and extreme velocity, therefore body stress, that make his major league prospects and lasting abilty cloudy.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 28, 2006 7:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Finally!
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 1:43 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Comments On Article
- Interesting that from age 25-32 is a 7 year career. The category with the highest survival rate was 34% confirming that most pitchers haver fairly short careers no matter what. Irrespective of whether they have injuries or not, pitchers like Pedro and Oswalt have already had much longer than average careers.
- The study doesn't say why they dropped out, or whether the dropouts had their performances evaluated. It's possible that many oif the dropouts did so due to performance issues rather than injury, that the performance stats and survival stats were done on different populations.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 10:13 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 2:36 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Proof
It's a very interesting study with some valuable information. Like most studies, it appears to have some methodological limitations.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 2:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ummm
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 5:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ummm....
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 5:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 5:38 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It shows data
by Havok1517 on
Nov 29, 2006 5:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Short, thin whatever
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 6:02 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Proof
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 5:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 5:59 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you actually read the article?
"...thin pitchers are much less likely to have long careers than any other group, and those that do stay around are much more likely to end up in relief..."
Lincecum is certainly thin.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 29, 2006 6:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 7:30 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What?
I mentioned that many times and even said that was a greater influence on his durability than his height.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 29, 2006 7:49 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OK so it wasn't you
"I still have serious injury doubts about his size and build combined with his reported velocity and stress he'll put on him arm during full MLB seasons."
by yoda1 on
Nov 30, 2006 1:13 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep, that was me
In order of importance to injury...
- build (think frame)
- velocity
- height
by Havok1517 on
Nov 30, 2006 2:03 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're Horse Looks Dead......
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 30, 2006 9:41 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not everyone is equal
I used to be the biggest Oswalt critic mainly due to his size then mechanics (max effort delivery) and groin injury concerns. I did not believe that he would be successful for as long as he has been. So never again will I downgrade a pitcher due to his size.
by yoda1 on
Nov 30, 2006 10:54 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Support
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 8:41 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Question is.....
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 30, 2006 9:40 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Profiling
As DrB points out, pitching is a risk factor for injury...period. Just like driving is a risk factor for any driver on the road.
Let's take Driver A at 5'11" 160 lbs and Driver B at 6'4" 220 lbs. Would either driver be at risk for injury behind the wheel of a moving vehicle? Of course. Would that risk increase if each were driving 98 mph? Most definitely. Would Driver A sustain more injuries than Driver B if both were to crash at 98 mph? Perhaps, but this is a question of degrees rather than absolutes. All things being equal, who would you rather have driving Miss Daisy?
Now let's say Driver A has a spotless driving record with no history of prior accidents while Driver B has had several crashes in the past. Furthermore, let's also say Driver A is a focussed and careful driver, who has even taken a course on safe driving, while Driver B drives distracted and has had no special training. Let's even say that Driver A drives a Volvo, while Driver B putts around in a Yugo. Who would you choose now? Sure, this is a somewhat curious analogy, but is it totally off base considering the ongoing debate about Lincecum being an injury risk simply based on his physical characteristics?
Adding a further word about profiling, the article in the link that Havok provides actually weakens his/her argument.
"It's clear that height has no real effect on whether or not a pitcher can shape a long career for himself, but weight certainly does."
-While it is unlikely that Lincecum can increase his height, he certainly can take steps to bulk up, and I'm sure the Giants will look into "legitimate" methods to help him do so.
"One theory would be that some of the pitchers I bunch in as overweight aren't really fat so much as they muscular."
-The author brings up the point about muscularity being a factor in a pitcher's longevity. I don't know about Lincecum's body type personally, but I would venture to guess he could be described as sinewy. This brings to mind another small, thin, sinewy athlete who could hold his own against much larger opponents...Bruce Lee.
"thin pitchers are much less likely to have long careers than any other group, and those that do stay around are much more likely to end up in relief."
-I don't think the Giants would mind much if Lincecum's career followed the path of Dennis Eckersley rather than the path that a perfect physical specimen such as Mark Prior appears to be taking.
by baseballjunkie on
Nov 29, 2006 10:22 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
one comment on the article
I think Linc will be very successful starting if he can stay healthy and if he moves to the pen and keeps his stuff then I think he'll be successful there too. I just question his future durabilty. Call it a hypothesis or a hunch but it is just my feeling on the guy.
by Havok1517 on
Nov 29, 2006 12:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Stamina
I've seen him, and I've gotta say he is real small for any player let alone a pitcher. I wonder how he'll stay strong over the course of a full season pitching every 5 days.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Nov 29, 2006 2:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Timmy's College Pitching Schedule
Once he started a game on just three days' rest, but in every other instance, he had at least the normal four days' rest between starts. In a handful of cases Timmy DID start just once a week -- but in those instances he pitched anywhere from a third of an inning to two full innings of relief to keep him sharp.
Timmy's college coach felt he was the best pitcher he had seen at the collegiate level, so he was reasonably careful with Timmy. If Timmy was going to start again soon, he tended not to stretch him out too far. And if he had a week between starts, the coach used him in relief between starts.
Timmy threw 125 1/3 innings for the University of Washington in 2006, but he did so over nearly four months. Timmy's first start came on February 10th, and while I can't remember the date of his last start for sure, I believe it was May 31st. I'm virtually certain that it wasn't prior to that date.
Timmy wound up throwing about 2600-2700 pitches in 2006 (college and professional combined). He did so over precisely seven months (February 10th through September 9th). In comparision, Matt Cain threw just over 3200 pitches over a little less than six months.
From viewing the pitch count in about a third of Timmy's 2006 starts, I believe he averaged just over 16 pitches per inning. Matt averaged 17.34 pitches per inning while striking out batters with little more than half the frequency Timmy did (although their competitive levels were far differnt).
The most efficient I saw Timmy in the three starts I witnessed was his last one. He wound up throwing 94 pitches over seven innings (13.4 pitches per inning), but if not for a passed ball and subsequent bad throw to first base to complete the strikeout, Timmy would have polished off the playoff team in just 84 pitches over the seven innings. That would have been only a dozen pitches per inning, and I wonder if the Giants would have brought him out for the eighth.
In the three starts I saw Timmy make, he averaged 15.2 pitches per inning. If the catcher had held the third strike in question or at least not misfired with what was a rather easy throw to first base, Timmy would have averaged 14.6 pitches per inning in those games.
Given that he was striking out batters at a rate of more than 15 per nine innings, that was pretty efficient pitching.
by sharksrog on
Dec 1, 2006 4:28 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pitching Schedule
Tim's last college appearance was, indeed on May 31. If his first start was on Feb 10, that's a 16 week season. He made 17 starts and 5 relief appearances in those 16 weeks. Hmm.....looks like about 1 start/week to me. That's an impressive workload for a college pitcher, especially with how deep he generally went into game, but it's a far cry from 120 pitches every 5 days for 30 starts that a frontline starter would get in the majors.
by DrBGiantsfan on
Dec 1, 2006 9:43 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let me just say...
Thank you,
Yoda
by yoda1 on
Nov 29, 2006 1:57 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't speak for John
We can conclude that John is giving Linc an A based on ability and/or potential. To automatically give a player a significantly lower grade, as Havok suggests, because of shortcomings (pun intended) which he has never even exhibited yet is not in the spirit of this exercise, in my opinion.
Linc will probably spend his entire career having to prove his detractors wrong, and if that serves as motivation to make himself the best player he can be, then more power to him.
by baseballjunkie on
Nov 29, 2006 3:45 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Havok's list
B Colon 5'11 250 97-98 mph (not a small frame)
W Rodriquez 5'11 160 92 mph fastball
C Gaudin 5'11 165 94 mph fastball
G Chacin 5'11 195 92 mph fastball
P Martinez 5'11 180 96 mph fastball
C Hensley 5'11 190 92 mph fastball
I Snell 5'11 190 96 mph fastball
G Perkins 5'10 195 94 mph fastball
and
Pedro
Hampton
Oswalt
Kazmir
Chacin
Fossum
Hudson
Gordon
Wagner
Rivera
Street
I'll bet a fair amount of money that the list performs better than league average over their careers. Does that prove that smaller pitchers tend to be better? No. Maybe what it proves is that there's a real bad bias towards short pitchers in the MLB and those that made thru the Milb tend to be very good and plays at a level above league average. But that's just me guessing. Anyway, it's foolish to bet on ANY pitcher becoming a front-line starter after his first half season as a pro because there's way too many things stacked against him. Pitchers in nature are high risks, no matter the size.
The fact of the matter is that Lincecum has never even complained about any soreness at all in his pitching career. Much less a major injury. And it's foolish to look over that fact and think he'll get hurt simply because of his size. Will he get hurt? Probably, it's a rarity when pitchers DON'T get hurt sometimes in their career for a significant amount of time. But that's not because he's small. It's because it's only natural. And I've read from at least 3 sources that the respectful authors loves Lincecum's delivery. Is it strange? Yes! But it could also be revolutionary. I'll take their word that the delivery is extremely efficient while not putting much stress on the arm.
Also, if there is a weird player every 10 years that does everything different with amazing result. I like the chance that it will be Lincecum's decade coming up.
by playingwithfire on
Dec 1, 2006 12:12 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
forgot to mention
by playingwithfire on
Dec 1, 2006 12:13 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2007
Last night Giants manager Bruce Bochy was interviewed on the Giants flagship station's "Hot Stove League" show. One of the two interviewers was Giants radio announcer Dave Flemming.
When the subject of Timmy came up, Bochy indicated that how fast a player could advance through a system was determined by many things including stuff and makeup. He said that some players were even able to jump to the majors a year after or even right out of college. He then went on to say that Timmy is above-average in all those factors. He said it all in a very low-key fashion, but it appeared to me that Timmy will actually get a chance during spring training to pitch his way onto the Giants staff.
In my mind, the two factors that could augur against a strong enough spring from Timmy to turn the Giants plans around would be that his waterfall curve is unlikely to break as much in the desert as it would in, say, the heavy air of San Francisco. Second, Brian Sabean is DEATH on control from a young pitcher. And control hasn't been Timmy's forte to date.
In Timmy's last professional outing, he walked only one batter -- and that one after a dropped third strike prevented his seventh of pitching from being completed after 84 pitches. But I believe 2006 was the first college season in which Timmy got his walks below even five per nine innings. As a professional he's done better (more in the low three's per nine innings), but control is probably an even bigger issue for Timmy than his having command of only two pitches at this point.
Timmy's fastball and curve (which he throws about two-thirds and one-third of the time, respectively) are both plus-plus pitches, so he may need little if anything more. If Timmy could ever learn to control his changeup, slider and knuckleball (Yes, he even has a knuckler!), he would be darn near unhittable.
Heck, he's pretty darn hard to hit as it is. His penultimate pro outing last season was a five-inning one-hitter (73 pitches) in which the lone hit was an infield scratch that would very likely have been turned into an out by Omar Vizquel, and the loudest-hit ball off his pitches was a looping liner by a righthanded hitter that found its way into the right field stands about 50 feet short of the wall.
In fairness though I should mention that his final (87th) pitch the first time I saw him was a high, inside fastball (94 mph if I remember correctly) that went out a lot faster than it came in. It came in a minor-league game, but it truly was a major-league homer.
Timmy has enough on his fastball to blow it by guys high, but he'll likely give up a lot fewer homers if he keeps it down.
I guess the two factors that have me most excited about Timmy are his extremely high strikeout rates both as a collegian and as a pro.
Timmy had something like 42 more strikeouts than any other NCAA pitcher last season -- just missing the 200 mark at 199 -- and I don't believe any professional pitcher came especially close to striking out as many batters per nine innings as Timmy did at short-season Salem-Keizer and High A San Jose.
And just as important is Timmy's history of no arm problems and that his own dad was clocked at 88 mph -- at the age of 55! Timmy Lincecum could conceivably be Livan Hernandez in another 33 years.
What he is today is a non-sanforized righthanded version of Randy Johnson. With the build of Roy Oswalt. With a pitching motion that has been compared to Kevin Brown. With the push off the pitching rubber of Nolan Ryan. And what has been described as the fastest arm speed ever.
Is it any wonder Will Caroll of Sports Illustrated and Baseball Prospectus said that considering ability and injury likelihood, if he had the opportunity to start a franchise with just one pitcher, his choice for the next ten years would be one Timothy LeRoy Lincecum?
by sharksrog on
Dec 1, 2006 3:36 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs





