What Is Wrong With These Prospects?
What Is Wrong With These Prospects?
A look at five players who are not living up to expectations so far.
John Danks, LHP, Texas Rangers:
Current Numbers: 2-4, 5.45 ERA for Double-A Frisco, 44/14 K/BB ratio in 35 innings, 48 hits allowed, seven homers.
What is Wrong? Danks struggled when promoted to Double-A last year, and this looks like a continuation. He has good stuff, but seems quite hittable despite the fact that he throws hard for a lefty. Righthanded hitters seem to pick up his curveball pretty well, but this year he is getting killed by lefties, too (.364/.451/.727). Reports are that he is leaving too many pitches up in the strike zone. The good news is that his K/IP ratio remains very good, but he obviously has some adjustments to make.
Is There Hope? He is just 21 years old, so as long as he is healthy, yes there is hope. But Danks' timetable has to be pushed back. He won't see Texas this year, and unless he turns things around soon, a refresher course in A-ball should be on the table.
Andy Marte, 3B, Cleveland Indians
Current Numbers: .238/.327/.331 for Triple-A Buffalo, one homer, 8 RBI, 18 walks, 38 strikeouts in 130 at-bats.
What is Wrong?: He played well early but fell into a slump when the calendar turned over to May. No word about any hidden injury, although that's possible. It's also possible he is simply discouraged about not making the team in spring training. Given his age (22), the fact that he is still controlling the strike zone reasonably well, and his previous track record, I am not overly concerned about him long-term. His strikeout rate is up this year, possibly a sign of excessive power-consciousness. . . he may be trying too hard to hit for power in an attempt to get back to the majors. He is hitting much better on the road (.309) than at home (.207). He's also hitting just .115 with runners in scoring position. These are all signs of a player who is "playing tight."
Is There Hope?: Of course. I think he's just pressing right now.
Troy Patton, LHP, Houston Astros
Current Numbers: 0-4, 4.36 for Class A Salem, with a 39/16 K/BB in 33 innings, 34 hits allowed, two homers.
What is Wrong?: He posted a 2.63 ERA in 41 innings for Salem last summer, so his numbers this year represent a comedown, although he's looked better lately and the W-L is a bit deceptive. K/IP remains very strong. His control has been erratic due to mechanical inconsistency, which keeps him from having consistent touch on his curveball and changeup. At this point, the best news is that he has been healthy, without recurrence of shoulder soreness that dogged him at times last year.
Is There Hope?: Absolutely, given his age (20) and past track record. This is the first time he's really been challenged in pro ball. As long as his strikeout rate remains strong and his shoulder isn't sore, he still has a good chance to succeed.
Cliff Pennington, INF, Oakland Athletics
Current Numbers: .158/.274/.178 for Class A Stockton, two doubles, eight RBI, 15 walks, 24 strikeouts in 101 at-bats. Six steals in seven attempts.
What is Wrong? A good question! Pennington held his own in the Midwest League last year, jumping directly from the Big 12. But he has been overmatched this year. Positive sign is the fact that he is still drawing walks, but unless he starts to hit with more authority, that won't matter. There is probably some bad luck BIBIP here, and I really can't believe, given his college track record and what he did in the Midwest League, that he's a .158 hitter. His statistical splits don't show much.
Is There Hope? My guess is that he will pull out of this by the middle of June, but that the slow start will suppress his season statistics in a major way. If he can get his numbers back up to around .250 with a good OBP and some doubles, he should be happy.
Marcus Sanders, 2B, San Francisco Giants
Current Numbers: .194/.286/.272 for Class A San Jose, six doubles, eight RBI, 13 walks, 22 strikeouts in 103 at-bats. 12 steals in 14 attempts.
What is Wrong? Like Pennington (although not as extreme), Sanders is still drawing a decent amount of walks but just isn't hitting the ball with much authority. He seems to be having a hard time against righthanders, hitting just .162 against them but .273 against lefties. His home/road split is also extreme, hitting just .130 in road games. His strikeout rate is identical to last year's, which I take as a good sign: he's making the same amount of contact he made last year, but isn't having the hits fall in the same way.
Is There Hope? He's only 20 years old. Like Pennington, I expect Sanders will pull out of it. His hole isn't as deep as Pennington's, and by the end of the year I think his numbers will be pretty solid.
26 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pedroia
I am sure he is still a good prospect because of his contact skills, batting eye, and defensive ability. But, his lack of bat speed seems to be catching up with him a bit after hitting AAA IMO.
Bat Speed
by jankeessuck on May 15, 2006 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Deric McKamey
subject
by Josh @ Minor League Ball on May 15, 2006 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Response
His bat may not be too impressive in the majors, but his ability to draw walks and defensive ability should give him a pretty decent shot at playing regularly for somebody.
My biggest concern is that major league pitchers will be able to approach him very aggressively and force him to beat them. I'm not sure he's capable of doing that consistently.
Comments
Marte - maybe the Braves were right (how's the Renteria deal looking?). I agree with the fact that he is pressing, but his prospects for being great go down by the day.
Patton - he'll be fine. An elevated BB rate is what's keeping him from being extremely effective. Still has good K/IP and HR/9 rates.
Pennington - I am surprised by him. All the reports on him were that he is an athletic player, so his struggle to adjust so far is pretty shocking to me.
Sanders - Same as Pennington. His athletic ability should allow him to eventually adjust, although I do like his prospects a bit more than Pennington's.
Marte
It's like robbing Peter to pay Paul. Unless Marte is a complete bust, the trade was a terrible one.
by Emad on May 16, 2006 2:58 AM EDT up reply actions
nah
I don't know how likely that is or isn't... but Marte doesn't have to be a complete bust who doesn't stick in the majors for this trade to be good for Atlanta.
At the time I thought ideally LaRoche should have been the odd man out. Move Larry to first. Marte plays 3B and trade something lesser for Renteria (Bosox were desperate to rid themselves or ER). But of course Larry didn't want to move and while the Redsox probably would have unloaded Renteria for less talent in return but then they wouldn't have thrown in the cash in that scenario... GMs have constraints that bloggers like to ignore.
by natsfan2005 @ Minor League Ball on May 16, 2006 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Sanders
WHAT ABOUT CAIN...
Command, Command, Command
His velocity has been a consistent 94-96, touching 98 against the cubs.
by irwin @ Minor League Ball on May 15, 2006 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Cain
by FI @ Minor League Ball on May 15, 2006 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Excellent feature!
by FunWithHeadlines on May 15, 2006 5:39 PM EDT reply actions
I thought
i agree
whaddaya know, he hit a homerun today and drew another walk. I think by seasons end you will see 290/375/500 from laroche with about 18-22 homeruns.
Marte
by bads85 on May 15, 2006 11:50 PM EDT reply actions
Regarding Marte!
I think Andy Marte has been trying too much to hit for power and putting too much pressure on himself, probably seeing that he has a legitimate chance to make the Majors with the Indians as Aaron Boone is struggling at the ML level virtually as badly as Marte at AAA.
Plus, keep in mind that Marte has never repeated a level in the Minor Leagues; he always expected to advance to the next level with each passing year - playing at the same level for the first time in his professional career may be a bit frustrating for him, especially after having an impressive Spring Training.
I think he's trying too hard - I always had concern about him being a great player as he's never hit for a high BA (.300+,) but I still think he can be a solid player (Aramis Ramirez or better) for the Indians. After all, he's only 22.
Also, in his defense, the entire Buffalo Bisons offense has been shut down, with the possible exception of Ben Francisco. His BA has gone up, virtually everyone else, from Franklin Gutierrez to Ryan Garko to Andy Marte to Jason Cooper to Jason Dubois, have all gone down (though Buffalo scored 9 runs yesterday against Ottawa, Baltimore's AAA affiliate. Garko led the way with 4 hits, Gutierrez had 2 hits, Marte had 1 I believe, Cooper had 1 I believe, and Dubois had 1 or 2 hits, so maybe they're coming out of a 2-3 week slump.)
Just my 2 cents. :-)
Take care and have a great day!
DANKS
6IP, 3H, 3R, 1BB, 12K's
nothing wrong here........
by hometeamfan on May 16, 2006 7:50 AM EDT reply actions
Danks
Texas League hitters are pretty good. Most are even better when they know that 90% of what they see will be 4-seamers.
Rick Adair's philosophy for developing these guys has been to heavily emphasize the 4-seamer and they throw almost nothing but. The thinking, I'm told, is that unless you can locate the 4-seamer, the rest doesn't matter. There's no question that Danks's fastball has improved through this process, even if his numbers don't necessarily reflect it.
For me, Danks is underrated because his ERA / BA don't reflect how good he is. I've seen three starts and I still haven't seen anyone hit his curve (from either side of the plate). Admittedly, the means I've only seen him throw about six or seven of those benders.
I look forward to seeing what he'll do when they unleash him, allowing him to throw any pitch in any count any time.
BTW, his change is really underrated. He rarely throws that either (about 6-8 per start), but I've seen him go to it as a strikeout pitch and he almost invariably gets a swing and miss. Of course, after seeing 15 straight 4-seamers, the change really comes as a surprise.
Bottom line, for me, there's nothing wrong with this kid. He's pretty damn good.
Danks
pennington's numbers look atrocious
.208 BABIP
by guy incognito on May 16, 2006 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
FYI: Danks' last three starts
-- Like I said; nothing wrong here.

by 












