FanPost

Giants MOD #2 - Finalize Round 1 Board, Round 2 discussion

MOD #1 is getting a bit cluttered so it's time for MOD #2. Below I'll list my board, top 10, with a 1 sentence pro and con for each. This is MINE, not OURS. Ours will be a combination of mine, shankbone's and Nnamdi's. I know I personally was getting a bit tunnel-visioned in the last thread, defending my guys to the point of not looking in other places, so I'll try to do better.

Also for this thread - Round 2 discussion. Do we want to take a hitter if we go pitcher in the first, and vice versa? Should we just build a board and pop the highest guy left (BPA style)? If we go college, should we go HS, and vice versa? Things like that.

Ok, my board as of 9AM, 5/20/13:

1. Phil Bickford, RHP, CA HS - PRO: Up to 97 with the fastball, with two secondary pitches that are more advanced than you usually see from a high schooler. CON: Shaky mechanics.

2. Chris Anderson, RHP, Jacksonville - PRO: Showed 96 earlier this year, has a plus slider, good size for a workhorse. CON - has been worked extremely hard by JU coaching staff, currently lacking third pitch.

3. Eric Jagielo, 3B, Notre Dame - PRO: I've been pretty vocal on him. 60 future power, good control of the strike zone. CON: May not be a 3B long term, moving to LF or 1B.

4. Jacob Brentz, LHP, Missouri HS - PRO: Up to 97 from the left side, when he dials it back he's got good command + sink. CON: Secondary offerings need work.

5. Matt Krook, LHP, CA HS - PRO: Projectable lefty sits in the low-90s with a good curveball. CON: Needs to work on secondaries, has some mechanics issues that will need to be cleaned up.

6. Austin Wilson, OF, Stanford - PRO: Lots of tools, especially big time power, above average in right. CON: Stanford swing needs a bit of work.

7. Alex Gonzalez, RHP, Oral Roberts - PRO: Shows 4 pitches, 3 of them plus, generates a lot of ground balls. CON: Concerns over long term durability because of build, below-average competition in college.

8. Hunter Dozier, SS, Stephen F. Austin - PRO: Likely a 3B or 2B in pro ball but with a bat that will play for the position. CON: Competition was poor. I'll own up to the fact that I just don't know a lot about him, going on shank's confidence in him here.

9. Andrew Thurman, RHP, UC Irvine - PRO: Polished college pitcher in the Chris Stratton model, four good pitches already. CON: Has faded a bit down the stretch, not a lot of upside left, could be a #4 at best.

10. Dustin Peterson, SS, Arizona HS - Throwing a HS position player to end my board. I like Peterson better than either Travis Demerritte or Peterson's older brother, D.J. PRO: Decent hit and power tools, athletic enough that he'll likely stay in the MIF in pro ball. CON: Not a shortstop going forward, no tools really stand out.

That's my ten. Interested in hearing yours. Let's get a first round board firmed up and move on to second round discussion.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Minor League Ball

You must be a member of Minor League Ball to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Minor League Ball. You should read them.

Join Minor League Ball

You must be a member of Minor League Ball to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Minor League Ball. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker