| Sign Up | Google+

Fanposts

PRESENTED BY
PRESENTED BY

RA Dickey to the Jays for D'Arnaud and Syndergaard - What is your take?


Dickey has been traded along with Thole and an unnamed prospect for D'Arnaud, Syndergaard, Buck, and an unnamed prospect. The deal won't be finalized until/unless the Jays are able to extend Dickey.

Personally I think it was a great move for both teams.

Mets - they get a very good haul. D'Arnaud and Syndergaard are both potential difference makers.

D'Arnaud - His D is solid and improving. He needs a little more work blocking balls and isn't the best at throwing out runners but it's expected he can improve both. More importantly it's said he calls a solid game. He has solid power and decent contact ability. He doesn't have the best approach and has had more injuries than you would like from a catcher especially since it's been his knees and back. Based on catcher attrition this is a serious risk. But he has serious upside as well.

Syndergaard - Great pitchers frame, very good velocity, good change, improving breaking ball. He needs to improve his command and I don't like his pitching motion, I would prefer it smoother. But with his frame throwing at his velocity I could see him backing off a little and still not losing velocity - because as his frame fills out he could add velocity. The hope is he could become a TOR. Two years in a row I have heard much improved breaking ball but still haven't heard it's consistently plus - so I'm a little more pessimistic with this pitch. He has a fair ways to go but is very young. Does his command and breaking ball improve? If so he will probably be a 2 with a chance to be a 1. If not we are looking anywhere from a 3, a back-end starter, or a dominant reliever.

Jays - They got a fantastic pitcher that rounds out their rotation. It also gives them the ability to utilize Happ as a swingman which is very important with Johnson and Morrow on their staff.

Dickey - People have to stop this "one year wonder" nonsense. Or career numbers nonsense. His pre-knuckleball numbers are totally irrelevant. He has pitched like an ace the last three years. And since he is a knuckleballer the ERA is probably more important than peripherals and it's been excellent. His home/road splits are excellent, his dome numbers are excellent.

Another thing people undervalue IMO is impact. 6 WAR over one year is much more valuable than 3 WAR per year for two years - simply for the opportunity cost. For example if the Jays had 5 pitchers with 2 WAR value per year and you added a 3 WAR pitcher it only adds 1 win. Where a 6 WAR pitcher adds 4 wins and thus would add 4 times as much value. This type of thinking always occurred before the days of WAR and advanced stats, seems like it hasn't made it into the calculations yet. Or maybe I missed it somewhere.

Well, what do you think?

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Recent FanPosts

View All Fan Posts

The Next FanPosts

There are 34 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

Site Meter
tracking_pixel_5351_tracker