Chicago Cubs Top 20 Prospects for 2012
Chicago Cubs Top 20 Prospects for 2012
The list and grades are a blending of present performance and long-term potential. Comments are welcome, but in the end all analysis and responsibility is mine of course. Full reports on all of players can be found in the 2012 Baseball Prospect Book. We are now taking pre-orders. Order early and order often!
QUICK PRIMER ON GRADE MEANINGS:
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment in the book for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
1) Brett Jackson, OF, Grade B+: I love his broad range of skills...speed, power, patience, defense. Only problem is a high strikeout rate which could foretell adjustment issues and/or preclude a high batting average. A more complete player than newly-acquired Rizzo, so ranks ahead for me.
2) Anthony Rizzo, 1B, Grade B+: Acquired today from Padres for Andrew Cashner. Nobody should panic about 128 at-bats. Although he's not going to hit .300 in the majors, Rizzo should provide plenty of power and walks and I think he'll make the needed adjustments. Maximum outcome: Ryan Howard. Worst-case: Chris Davis.
3) Javier Baez, SS-3B, Grade B: 2011 first-round pick. Outstanding bat speed, should hit for average and power. Questions revolve around future position as well as volatile personality. Higher ceiling than Jackson or Rizzo but we need to clear these issues up first.
4) Matt "Scrabble" Szczur, OF, Grade B-: Borderline B. Grade under review. Outstanding tools but still learning how to play baseball. Uses speed very well, skilled defensively, should develop more power but plate discipline slipped in High-A.
5) Trey McNutt, RHP, Grade B-: Hampered by nagging injuries in Double-A and gets a partial mulligan, although stock is legitimately down a bit. I am concerned by low strikeout rate.
6) Dillon Maples, RHP, Grade B-: 14th round pick with second-round talent, hasn't pitched yet. Scouting reports point to number two starter potential, or perhaps a relief ace if he doesn't develop a changeup, or if his funky delivery results in durability issues. Grade speculative given lack of pro data.
7) Dan Vogelbach, 1B, Grade B-: 2011 second-round pick. I really, really believe in this bat. Enormous power combined with legitimate hitting skills and strong plate discipline. Main problem is jumbo size; at times he has carried more pounds than I do, and he's not a sedentary middle-aged writer. If he can stay in decent condition he could move quite quickly and provides a backup plan if Rizzo doesn't work out.
8) Junior Lake, SS, Grade C+: Borderline B-. Excellent athlete, with power and speed, great throwing arm. Poor plate discipline, erratic track record, and probable position switch hurt stock, but has tremendous upside. Much better physical ceiling than Vogelbach, of course, but I'm less confident in his ability to hit.
9) Welington Castillo, C, Grade C+: Considerable power with a great throwing arm, still somewhat raw with the glove. Spotty strike zone judgment could be an issue, but could supplant Geovany Soto eventually.
10) Dae-Eun Rhee, RHP, Grade C+: Tommy John survivor saw velocity boost, continued to throw strikes, and was extremely effective in High-A down the stretch, posted 32/5 K/BB in last 25 innings with 2.16 ERA. If he maintains that momentum in 2012, will break through and shoot up prospect lists.
11) Josh Vitters, 3B-1B, Grade C+: Placement is very difficult. You can make a case as high as eight or as low as 15. Strengths remain age (22) and contact ability, but still short-circuits himself with impatience. At some point he's got to produce more than this, and with the new regime in place he needs to take that step forward now.
12) Jeimer Candelario, 3B, Grade C+: Outstanding performance in the Dominican Summer League. Scouting reports are good, too. Unfortunately DSL performance is not particularly predictive, but he has good plate discipline and scouts are impressed with him. May face position switch. Could rank much higher once we see him in North America.
13) Marco Hernandez, SS, Grade C+: Solid performance in Arizona Rookie League, gap power, should hit for average, and can remain at shortstop. Could also rank much higher a year from now.
14) Chris Carpenter, RHP, Grade C+: Power arm pitched poorly in Triple-A bullpen due to command issues but looked much better in Arizona Fall League. Dominant when his command is working.
15) Rafael Dolis, RHP, Grade C+: Could rank as high as 10th if you aren't concerned by his poor strikeout rate in Double-A. Power sinker could get him significant major league innings in 2012 but will need better command to close. I don't like him as much as some other people do, but upper-90s sinkers are rare.
16) Zach Cates, RHP, Grade C+: Acquired in the Cashner/Rizzo trade. Often overlooked due to 4.78 ERA in Low-A, but he has a live arm and peripheral stats were much better. Breakthrough possible.
17) Ben Wells, RHP, Grade C+: Arkansas high school talent from 2010 draft is another sinkerball expert, impressed scouts in Northwest League. Number three starter upside.
18) Dave Sappelt, OF, Grade C+: Acquired in Sean Marshall deal. Perfect fourth outfielder with a broad balance of average tools/skills.
19) Ronald Torreyes, 2B, Grade C+: Acquired in Sean Marshall deal from Reds. Excellent performance record, hits for average, very reliable with the glove, but undersized at 5-7, 150. Can he do what Jose Altuve did with the Astros?
20) Reggie Golden, OF, Grade C+: Struggled with contact in Northwest League. A raw hitter, but power potential is quite impressive. High risk/high reward type.
21) Gioskar Amaya, INF, Grade C+: Hit .377 in rookie ball, lacks distance power at this time and needs better plate discipline. Long-term position unsettled as well, but a nice ceiling.
22) Tony Zych, RHP, Grade C+: Lively arm drafted in fourth round in '11, projects as a closer if he sharpens his command.
23) Shawon Dunston, Jr, OF, Grade C+: Excellent speed, but lacks strength/power and raw for a bloodline player. Good upside as a leadoff type but will take time to get there.
24) Aaron Kurcz, RHP, Grade C+ Good year as a swingman in Florida State League, excellent K/IP ratio with few hits given up, above-average stuff.
OTHERS: Jeffry Antigua, LHP; Dallas Beeler, RHP; Jeff Beliveau, LHP; Jeff Bianchi, INF; Lendy Castillo, RHP; Pin-Chieh Chen, OF; Zeke DeVoss, 2B; Jae-Hoon Ha, OF (a lot of people really like him but he looks like a tweener to me); Jay Jackson, RHP; Eric Jokisch, LHP; Austin Kirk, LHP (season collapsed after he threw the no-hitter);; Luis Liria, RHP; Kevin Rhoderick, RHP; Jose Rosario, RHP; Neftali Rosario, C; Hayden Simpson, RHP; Nick Struck, RHP; Yao-Ling Wang, RHP; Logan Watkins, 2B; Robert Whitenack, RHP.
The exact rankings of the players, especially 12-24, is quite difficult in this system, so don't get bent out of shape if you think the guy at 19 should be at 12 or something like that. If you are looking for guys who will help in the short run, someone like Sappelt would move up the list. Some guys in the "Others" section could see major league action soon and help out, including Jeff Beliveau, Rule 5 pick Lendy Castillo, and Nick Struck.
The major league roster needs a revamp, and the new Epstein/Hoyer administration is hard at work on that. But even before the Cashner and Marshall trades, the farm system had some good things going for it and was, in my opinion, underrated.
The weakness heading into the off-season was obvious: lack of impact talent close to the majors beyond Brett Jackson. Acquiring Rizzo helps with that. But there are very intriguing players at the lower levels who have the potential to develop considerably, particularly products of the solid Latin American and Asian programs. In this respect the Cubs remind me of the Indians system: there is a LOT of depth in C+ and "Grade C with upside" type prospects. Some of those guys will develop.
The biggest problem I see currently is lack of high-powered pitching. There is nobody here who looks like they can anchor a major league rotation with any certainty. That's not to say that there aren't live arms; there are quite a few, although most of them project better as relievers or back-end starters. There are a few candidates who can get beyond that, although they all have significant questions attached. McNutt had a bad year but could rebound, it is too soon to tell about Maples, and both Rhee and Cates could take big steps forward.
Overall, if I was a Cubs fan, I would be pleased with the level of depth, but anxious (in a good way) to see how the new front office manages the draft and international scouting to bolster what is already present.
59 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No problems with the list
Handful of folks who deserved B- or better. I disagree about a couple tiny things, but overall, pretty much what I anticipated, a deep run of C+ candidates. Out of curiosity, how much further would your C+ list have gone? I count at least 6-8 guys you left off that I could consider a C+.
Admittedly, mildly surprised you did completely leave Whitenack off of the write-up here.
oh as for Szczur
I’ve defended him before, but I do think B- is fair for him. The discipline trends were headed in the wrong direction before Daytona.
c+
There are probably 3 or 4 more guys who could be C+.
Whitenack I was a little skeptical about even before the injury.
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2012 12:14 AM EST up reply actions
interesting
general grading question – an arm like Beliveau, who has such a dominant season – is his limited future role and average fastball (likely portending a future as a LOOGY, at best, borderline setup), hard to rate higher than a C?
Concern on Whitenack on secondary stuff, or just not buyiing that the increased velocity would stay (the increased velo was there from spring all the way to injury)?
I’m mildly curious, although in the grand of scheme of things, it’s not the biggest deal, about the gap from Cates to say, Antigua (who at one point this year, you suggested could be borderline B-), Beeler (who I like better than Cates), and Struck (he’s an awful tough grade, pushed fast, but a lot of work to do in the upper levels).
As a total side note two, looking at Maples, his funky arm action reminds me a bit of Struck’s arm action.
questions
Both Antigua and Beliveau are likely going to be a C+ in the book. I like them both quite a bit, but LOOGY types hard to rate higher than that. Beeler lost a lot of dominance when he reached Double-A.
Whitenack…yeah, the velocity boost followed by a blown elbow makes me cautious that it will stick around. Also saw him look pretty bad in 2010 so that sticks in my mind.
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2012 12:23 AM EST up reply actions
hmm
Beeler’s numbers in AA were iffy, but he largely wasn’t ready for it, but stuff wise, I didn’t hear of a decline. Still heard low 90 sinker with decent-solid breaking ball/changeup. Was it just a performance concern or did you hear something about the stuff that bothered you.
If it’s performance, then I’m mildly wondering why Cates gets the benefit of the doubt, but not Beeler. Beeler’s only 6 months older than Cates, arguably has a deeper arsenal (3 decent-good pitches right now, whereas Cates is still, at least, most reports suggest this, trying to polish his slider up to a decent standard), more life on the fastball, gets a high rate of GB’s, and the better control (something that held in AA) seems to suggest a better chance at becoming a starter.
Admittedly, nitpicking a bit, no doubt about it, but I just don’t see the gap from Beeler to Cates.
hmm
Yeah, you’re nitpicking :)
No harm done. We could argue forever about C/C+ guys.
I gotta get some sleep. I have two 14-hour workdays ahead of me this weekend.
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2012 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
only nitpicking because you seemed
to suggest Beeler wasn’t a C+ and everything out there seems to suggest better arsenal, better control than Cates, with the only issue being that Cates got to be in the MWL all year.
anyhow, get some sleep. It’s a very solid list. A bit surprised at your bullishness on Vogelbach. I actually think it’s one of your best Cubs lists in the past decade.
Question
How would you grade Cashner and Na?
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
when a guy exceeds rookie status, I kind of put him out of my head, lol. Na is barely a prospect at this point, Grade C.
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2012 12:13 AM EST up reply actions
C might be nice the way the Cubs system shakes out right now
There’s a lot of C’s in the system that are a lot more intriguing than Na.
Surprising
I thought you would be much higher on Golden. Serious power, improved patience, solid defender, good speed (though he most likely won’t be a legit base stealer), and a good throwing arm.
Adoptive father of 18th round draft pick and future ace, BRANDON ALLEN
by Nnamdi Asomugha on Jan 7, 2012 12:15 AM EST reply actions
golden
I like Golden but the contact issues are enough to make me a bit cautious right now
by John Sickels on Jan 7, 2012 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
I think C+ is fair
I like Golden a bit, but when you are striking out that much in short-season, it’s a big warning flag. In Golden’s defense, though, IIRC, he was very raw coming out of HS, so here’s a case where the hope is that he’ll learn and develop over time, as he doesn’t have a bad eye at the plate.
i agree its a fair grade but
I just had a feeling John would rank him higher. Like around 15.
Adoptive father of 18th round draft pick and future ace, BRANDON ALLEN
by Nnamdi Asomugha on Jan 7, 2012 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
Big Jackson fan
I love the kids tools. If he can put everything together he is one of the few legit five tool threats. Hopefully the Cubbies give him a long look this spring.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 7, 2012 1:57 AM EST reply actions
anyone remember Hayden Simpson?
I was shocked that some cubs fans loved that pick
wasnt he something like division I pitcher? his talent didnt translate well
before there was law, there were the Cowboys!!!
not exactly fair assessment yet
Given his past illness (mono?), he reportedly wasn’t at full strength this last season.
too early to write him off
he had a ridiculously bad case of mono last year and reports from spring were that he wasn’t 100%. Then, after the season, they found a tear or fracture in his elbow, and it turned out he had been pitching with it all year. It seems clear that the injuries/mono had something to do with it -a guy doesn’t go from 90-95 on the fastball (depending on what reports you believe, but almost everyone had him as at least low 90’s out of college) to being unable to consistently hit 90 without something happening.
Unable to consistently hit 90?
He was having trouble hitting 87 midway through the year. I hope the elbow fracture is healed.
using Vitters as an example
Vitters has always interested me because of his approach at the plate. Unlike other prospects, I’ve never seen him described as having “holes” in his swing. And also considering that he spent his first few years in the minors catching up to the level of play and then being promoted right away before he had the chance to really pad his stats, doesn’t this lend itself toward a more positive outlook for his career than his final stat lines would indicate?
I’ve followed the Cubs minor league system fairly closely from the comfort of my couch the past several years, but I don’t really follow other systems, and so I don’t have a good comparison for Vitters in my mind. Can anyone provide past comps from other systems?
Unfair assessment of Austin Kirk
“Austin Kirk, LHP (season collapsed after he threw the no-hitter)”
That is not what happened at all. He pitched his no-hitter on July 4th. In his last two starts of July and 1st start in August he was dominant giving up a total of 2 runs over the 3 starts.
After that in the last month he struggled.
A fair assessment would be that Kirk was pitching his first full season schedule since being drafted from high school. He started 28 games, the most of any Cubs minor league starter and simply ran out of gas late in the season. Even with the late season struggle he finished with a 1.19 WHIP in his first full season
Kirk is still one of the top Cubs starting pitcher prospects. He’s still a top 10 prospect.
He still doesn't throw 90 consistently
Really good curve and a solid changeup, but that fastball will hold him back.
If Rizzo is Ryan Howard without the -9 baserunning runs, and good fielding,
that’s great, if he’s as valuable as Howard, it’s not.
serious?
Look Howard has his flaws, and arguably he’s not worth the $125M contract. But he’s still been worth about 23 WAR in about 6.5 seasons of play. You’ve got to be thrilled if Rizzo ends up as good.
Going for shock value?
Because getting a Ryan Howard player for Cashner would be a steal.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 8, 2012 10:58 PM EST up reply actions
I'm still a believer in Vitters, and I think the move to the OF will help him,
plus he showed some signs this season of finally figuring himself out offensively.
This is a big year for him, though, no doubt.
I don't think he's going to be in OF full-time
There’s really no one that’s going to block him at 3rd in Iowa next year as of now. Maybe Marquez Smith, but coming off the injured season he had and without a high ceiling, it seems doubtful. There were also indications last fall that they wanted him to get work in the OF in AFL (and he played some first there), but planned on him being back at 3rd. Now, new regime, so a lot is up in the air. But with Rebel Ridling likely needing AB’s in the OF, along with Brett Jackson, who looks to start there, my guess is Vitters starts at Iowa at 3rd, and dabbles at 1st/corner OF during the season. He did improve defensively this year (I noted it in a mid-season discussion with nixa, and KG said similarly in his Cubs write-up), but he’s still below average at 3rd.
Maybe, but that has nothing to do with Vitters, and more to do with Ramirez leaving.
Ian Stewart still has some projection in him, and maybe a change of scenery will bring it out, but if he continues to struggle, Vitters is the only in-house option to come up and play.
But the mistake to avoid is believing the Cubs moving Vitters to the OF is an indication they have given up on him.
Vitters is a heck of a player, and just like Oakland with Grant Green and San Diego with James Darnell, the move to the OF is a positive one.
It accelerates their arrival to the majors, and likely puts them in a better position to succeed.
How often do you see outfielders moved to the infield?
The Brewers took a really good player who happened to suck at third base and made him an MVP left fielder.
It took three years, but I don’t think they regret it at all.
Braun's bat plays in a corner outfield spot.
Vitters’ is hoping his bat will play anywhere at this point. His bat hasn’t been good enough to warrant moving him a new position.
--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
by jameslcrockett on Jan 9, 2012 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome job John
Yet another great list.
I myself, would consider Szczur a “B” and Torreyes a “B-” but am perfectly fine with where they’re both at.
I give the Cashner for Rizzo deal a true A for the Cubbies.
Yoenis Cespedes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW9ge8l3jY8
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jan 7, 2012 6:06 PM EST reply actions
I actually thought John was charitable with Szczur
He’s under the microscope in 2012. His game needs to advance to another level or two.
The Blackhawks and the Stanley Cup in 2010.
-1
I think Szczur is worthy of a B. His defense and baserunning are both plus, and when I’ve seen him he has hit consistently hard line drives. Doesn’t have a lot of loft in his swing, but he’s very strong, and I think power will come. Walks are my only concern, but he seemed to have good pitch recognition, so that’s probably coachable.
by PrincetonCubs on Jan 8, 2012 2:12 AM EST up reply actions
I can see it both ways
I mean, it’s not like he “can’t” walk. He showed some ability of it in Peoria, before tailing off after that first month, so it’s not a case of “instincts” here. That said, there’s got to be some definite concern about said rates, so I don’t think a B- isn’t unwarranted.
Bold prediction in 2012 Vogelbach will shoot up the system and become Jaff Decker 2.0 !!!
Yoenis Cespedes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW9ge8l3jY8
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jan 7, 2012 6:14 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Very interesting to see what McLeod and company do with this current crop
Josh Vitters? You can write him off. Yet another terrible pick by Tim Wilken.
Dillon Maples is the one name I will pay most attention to in 2012. Very intriguing prospect.
Anthony Rizzo? I like it that Jed Hoyer says he’ll start the season at Iowa. I think Theo and Jed were able to acquire Rizzo because his stock had somewhat fallen, or at least it had fallen in the eys of Josh Byrnes and Bud Black. I have faith that this kid pans out well.
Brett Jackson? I continue to worry over his ability to hit for average. Hope I’m wrong about that. Again, he will value from at least a half season at Iowa I believe. Let him work under the new Jason regime and see if they can cure the double hitch.
The Blackhawks and the Stanley Cup in 2010.
I understand Vitters hasn't been what Cubs fans hoped, but how can you write off a 22 year old that will start 2012 in AAA?
He’s not showing that he’ll be the player everyone hoped, but he still has a good opportunity to be a successful major league player. 2012 will be a very important year for him.
I hope Brett Jackson...
doesn’t spend one damn second caring about whether you worry about his batting average. You could be “wrong” about that, and he could still end up a very productive player.
--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
by jameslcrockett on Jan 9, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
Nice work John
Curious if you still held out any hope for Micheal Burgess?
" Tell me something Steve, How does a guy from Puerto Rico lose a ball in the Sun? "
Beliveau?
Cant give Beliveau at least a C? Why not?
by ibleedcubbieblue7 on Jan 8, 2012 2:20 AM EST reply actions
actually
John said above that Beliveau would likely be a C+. I think, for some, the general issue with grading Beliveau, as dominant as he was this past year, is that he still profiles as more of a middle reliever, and sometimes it is hard to assign high grades to guys whose future role may not generate that much value.
Cates BA Trade Writeup
Undrafted out of high school and after his first year at Northeast Texas CC, Cates moved to the mound full-time in 2010, just in time to pull down $765,000 from the Padres as a third-rounder that summer. Cates worked primarily as a catcher up through 2009 and still is learning the finer points of his new craft. He tends to pitch away from contact now and distrusts his changeup, while his delivery tends to be too mechanical and his release point too inconsistent. Cates pitches with an arm wrap in the back of his motion, but most of the time his athleticism allows him to get in position to throw his secondary stuff. Cates pitches at 91-93 mph with sinking and tailing life when he gets extension, but he leaves his fastball up and over the plate a bit too often. He tops out near 96 and does it easy, affording him a bit of natural deception. He shows some feel for a split-changeup, and scouts believe it can be average with more work. The Padres swapped out Cates’ curveball in favor of a slider in late August because he struggled to command his curve with his long arm stroke. He showed occasional ability to spin a curve, so his slider could develop into a weapon. Cates’ power repertoire and inconsistent mechanics suggest a future in the bullpen, and he’s ready for high Class A.
That is far less intriguing than some of the other reports out there about him. Still an exciting arm, and being so raw to pitching gives hope for more, but if we’re talking about low 90’s fastball, hoping for an average change, and a new slider, considering his age, I might prefer him to be fast-tracked as a pen. Seems like mixed reports on the ability of that changeup.
cates
I had a more positive report on him from Midwest League source, but it was from earlier in the season. Sounds like BA point about Padres changing his breaking ball is more recent information.
I still like him though.
by John Sickels on Jan 8, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
Lake
Hi John,
Like the list for the most part, but there is any reason why Lake is so high? Going into his age 22 season, and parts of five seasons in the minors, he still seems to be all tools. His strikeout-to-walk rate is atrocious, and he’s even worse in the field. The power looks to be coming around, but with the bad-looking peripherals, do you think he’ll even have a shot of putting it together in the majors? I just don’t know if he can improve his game after 5 seasons of atrocious baseball, despite having the tools. Are you a little more optimistic than I?
lake
he’s risky but I think he has a chance, yes
by John Sickels on Jan 8, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
BA on the Cubs System
(h/t Rob over at NSBB)
When I listed my personal overall Top 50 in the 2012 Prospect Handbook, I had Brett Jackson at No. 28, Javier Baez at No. 31 and Rizzo at No. 42, so that would put Rizzo third on an updated Cubs list. I like Rizzo’s power potential and think he’s the third-best first-base prospect in baseball (behind the Astros’ Jonathan Singleton and the Padres’ Yonder Alonso), but Jackson and Baez are up-the-middle players and Baez has the bat to be an impact player if he moves down the line.
None of Chicago’s other acquisitions would crack the Top 10. There’s depth in the farm system, so if I were updating the Cubs Top 30 I wrote for the Handbook, I’d put Torreyes, Cates and Sappelt (in that order) in the back half of that list. Torreyes is a career .364 hitter in the lower minors, but he’s also 5-foot-7 and lacks a second standout tool, so he’s really going to have to max out what he has to make it as a big league regular. Cates has a strong arm but is relatively new to pitching and has a lot of work to do, while Sappelt looks like a fourth outfielder who’s overmatched in center field.
In our preliminary system rankings in the Handbook, we put Chicago at No. 14. When we release our final rankings this spring, the Cubs’ moves will push them up a spot or two.
As for Volstad, I thought he was a nice pickup in the Carlos Zambrano trade. Chicago might have released Zambrano if it couldn’t have traded him. Though the Cubs had to eat $15 million of Zambrano’s $18 million salary for 2012, they got a young, durable starter. Volstad may not be more than a No. 4 starter because he doesn’t miss enough bats, but he’ll help Chicago more than Zambrano would have.
Honestly, last year they had the cubs 8th pre-Garza deal. I feel like BA grades the Cubs system better than … many Cubs fans.
Cubs fans are understandably jaded.
I’m holding out hope that a Soler or Cespedes signing will push the ranking up even further… or even a Garza deal.
--------------------------------
Just North of Wrigley Field
by jameslcrockett on Jan 9, 2012 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for this
It’s always good to have a better idea what the much-better informed fans on BCB are talking about.
Hopefully there’s good days ahead for the Cubbies.
"Keep pushin' til' it's understood. And these badlands start treating us good."

by 














