The Michael Pineda/Jesus Montero Trade
The big news in prospect-land today is, of course, last night's huge trade. The Seattle Mariners spent pitchers Michael Pineda and Jose Campos to the New York Yankees in exchange for DH/catcher Jesus Montero and pitcher Hector Noesi.
Some thoughts below the fold:
I was out of touch and off the internet last night and didn't hear about the trade until this morning. I logged onto Minor League Ball and saw a fanpost headline about a Pineda/Montero trade. My first impulse was that someone was discussing a fantasy trade, but then I saw that there were more than 100 comments in the discussion thread.
Of course it turned out to be real.
I have Jesus Montero rated as a Grade A prospect in the 2012 Baseball Prospect Book. I know he isn't a complete player. His defense is weak and he's basically a born DH, but I am completely sold on his bat, to the point that I do see him as a Grade A and one of the best prospects in the game even with his defensive limitations. I'm no Yankees fan and I don't think I can be accused of "east coast bias." Although Montero has spent two seasons in Triple-A, he just turned 22 in November. If he develops along any sort of normal age curve, he will be one of the leading hitters in baseball over the next decade.
Pineda, meanwhile, had a very strong rookie season for the Mariners. I had him rated as a Grade A prospect entering 2011 and he certainly would be again if he was still rookie-eligible. If he stays healthy, he will be a legitimate ace in the coming years.
Campos has a live arm but is at least two years away from being able to contribute in the majors. I think he can be a mid-rotation starter if all goes well.
I am busy with a family commitment at the moment, but I will have a more formal write-up about this trade later this evening. Thanks for your patience.
In the meantime, who do you think won this trade?
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wish there was a win/win option because this was a pretty even trade in terms of value
But comparing this to the Latos deal, I have to vote Yankees
I'm kind of on this end of things.
I don’t think it was a “win” either way. I think both sides got what they wanted / needed.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 14, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure I follow....
You’re using Latos as a negative factor but is that because you think Pineda is much better, more likely to succeed, or do you feel that Cinci simply gave up too much?
More to the point, how would you feel if the trade had been Montero for Latos?
For the record, Latos is only 13 months older than Pineda but has pitched 258 more innings.
Statistically they match up well on the basics, with a mid 3’s ERA, 1.15 WHIP while averaging 9 K’s and 3 BB’s per 9 innings. Latos has an edge in groundball (42.8% to 36.3%) and flyball (41.3 to 44.8) rates and this is reflected in their HR/9 rates – Latos 0.82 Pineda 0.95.
Considering that both pitchers have moved to hitter friendly parks, I would be especially concerned about those last rates. Latos’ home/road splits were pretty even while Pineda’s road ERA was much higher, but I’ve read that the underlying metrics suggest only a smaller reliance on Safeco.
A lot of people still feel Cinci gave up too much for Latos but I like what Tim Dierkes said in a chat recently, “…Latos. He’s as close to an ace as you could get on the trade market and they didn’t hurt their big league club to get him.”
With Montero penciled in as the Yankee DH for 2012, I’m again confused by your use of Latos as a deciding factor……the Cinci guys were blocked so wasn’t that also a win/win?
Anyway, I think Seattle got the better deal; kept Felix as face of the franchise (like Griffey was); finally got a DH to fill the big shoes of Edgar Martinez; dealt from a strength, with Hultzen, Paxton and Walker set to debut (2012,2013,2014 respectively?!) and likely overcome the loss of Pineda.
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof. -John Kenneth Galbraith, economist (1908-2006)
I Lean More Toward M's
Just because there need for hitting is much more dramatic than the Yanks’ need for pitching. Montero definitely adds instant pop to their lineup, and furthermore, Noesi isn’t a bad arm who is close to the bigs that probably could benefit in Safeco. That being said, I think it’s win-win for both sides, though if I’m a Yankees fans I like this a lot because they didn’t have to give up Banuelos or Betances in the deal.
What can I say...I like Colombia and I like Carlos Willoughby...It's win-win.
I don't think the Noesi/Campos swap is as bad as some M's fans seem to think
You trade readiness for upside. Teams do this all the time, and Campos’ upside comes with some risk.
Overall, relative to the current environment baseball is in, I vote the Yankees, but slightly. In an era where young pitchers with some success and high upside are significantly protected and highly valued, I think this is a good deal for them.
But as someone noted above, it’s really a decent deal for both sides. There’s some risk with Pineda and Montero, but one team needed pitching and one team needed hitting, and both guys have elite ceilings, even if both had their own issues (change-up (and perhaps injury concerns) and position). The M’s seem to be thinking that Noesi could step into the rotation and be decent sooner than later.
I like this trade more for the M's.
Pineda is a terrific talent, but they desperately needed a catcher, especially one like Montero.
Add in the fact that the M’s have Hultzen, Walker, Paxton, and Campos in their system, and I think they definitely won this trade.
This was also a great trade for the Yankees, but I love this move more for the M’s.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
Pineda is a terrific talent, but they desperately needed a catcher, especially one like Montero.
Montero likely won’t stick at C.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Really?
You think he’s going to be a DH?
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Jan 14, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions
Or 1B.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
Wonder what would happen to Smoak if Montero moved to 1B.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Jan 14, 2012 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
Montero has the potential to have a good enough bat to stick at DH and still provide great value for the team.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
There is about a 95% chance that he's going to be primarily a DH
He might play a couple of games at 1B or C, but little more
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on Jan 15, 2012 10:27 AM EST up reply actions
More a matter of believing in Smoak imo
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof. -John Kenneth Galbraith, economist (1908-2006)
Just forgot that Campos was in the trade.
Still, they have three elite talents in Hultzen, Walker, and Paxton.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Jan 14, 2012 2:32 PM EST up reply actions
If the Yanks viewed him as a catcher they don't trade him.
Simple as that. You don’t trade a catcher with that kind of offensive profile for anybody. Pretty clear the front office finally gave up on the idea of him catching.
You don't think an excellent young, cost controlled starting pitcher and potential ace is worth a catcher with a high offensive potential?
The Mariners are going to try him at catcher, regardless of what the Yankees thought.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 14, 2012 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
That's my thinking as well.
"Hakeem couldn't kick your ass cuz you were too
close kissin his!"- Sir Charles to Kenny Smith.
by bone31crusher on Jan 14, 2012 11:33 PM EST up reply actions
I thought you weren't a big Montero fan?
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 15, 2012 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
Follow the thread, KBR.
I’m consistent in my opinions on Montero.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 15, 2012 3:37 AM EST up reply actions
I was referring to your past comments on Montero
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 15, 2012 9:15 AM EST up reply actions
I think the answer still fits.
I’ve been consistent in my opinions on Montero.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 16, 2012 12:17 AM EST up reply actions
Draw
I think both teams made out well in this trade.
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
Sorry, unauthorized hotlinking of copyrighted material not permitted.
I am interested in what people's thoughts on this piece are I wrote
http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2012/1/14/2707200/montero-smoak-carp-and-wells-how-it-works
It’s not long, but the gist of it is it has been said the Mariners see Montero as being able to catch, at least to a certain extent. Thus I propose the Carlos Santana treatment, allowing him to stay in the lineup all the time, and how it fits around the other pieces.
Weird piece
You have Montero playing 1B part time when he’s never, ever played 1B professionally? From everything I’ve read, the people who say he can’t catch also say he can’t play 1B.
I know he hasn't played there yet, but I expect him to at least get work at it.
I don’t expect him to play many games there, just enough to see ow he is doing and see if he has the potential to play there in the future.
Who says that?
I say he can’t catch. I have no idea if he can play first base… but I sure as hell would give it a shot.
No one has ever said he couldn't play first base.
There is a profound difference between saying that “he wont play first base” and “he wont play first base FOR NEW YORK”. The reason should be obvious, his name is Mark.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 14, 2012 5:06 PM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't ever say any player was incapable of playing 1B
without trying them there first.
Some see a glass half empty, some a glass half full. I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be. - George Carlin
Just because I feel like nitpicking
Chipper Jones is essentially incapable of playing 1B because of foot issues that the Braves felt would be aggravated by all the extra movement that would be necessary there. But yeah, something like that is the only reason I can see for assuming a guy couldn’t handle 1B.
Trades a fair one for both sides.
Never been a Pineda fan but pssibly what…5 years of a cost controlled potential TOR arm? That’s great for the Yankees.
Montero is the best player in the deal…I do believe his defensive ability at C can allow him to survive there for a couple seasons. I think the Yankees liked him as a C enough but let the negative talk fester since talk is talk.
by SenorGato on Jan 14, 2012 3:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I don't think there's any chance he plays 90 games a year at C
But otherwise, I buy this. I think it’ll more likely be 15 at C, 15 at 1B and the rest at DH
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on Jan 15, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
Yankees
The Yankees won this trade on every level. When Mat Latos goes for Alonso, Volquez, Boxberger, and Grandal – and the Mariners have to give up a second top ten prospect to go along with a guy who has no defensive value whatsoever, the Yankees absolutely fleeced them.
I like Montero offensively – agree with everyone that he is going to hit in spades – but the market price for young pitching this season was so much higher and Montero’s value isn’t what it should be because of his defensive ineptitude.
Hmm...
I think Pineda and Montero are nearly equal in value. Noesi was a top 10 Yankee prospect a year ago and Campos is top 5 to top 10, depending on who you talk to.
If it is in favor of the Yankees, it’s only slight, not a fleecing.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 14, 2012 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
Montero
Is an order of magnitude better than any of the prospects who moved in the Latos or Gio deals.
Yeah, quantity over quality.
Not to say that the Latos returnees aren’t quality. Just not the same kind of quality as one Montero.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 14, 2012 7:33 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed here
I think it is a good deal for BOTH teams. The Mariners got a top 5 young offensive talent for a good young MLB pitcher. If Smoak continues to disappoint they will have their long term 1B answer, and if Smoak thrives they still have a great young DH.
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 15, 2012 12:38 AM EST up reply actions
completely shocking that Cash dealt Montero.
this could be his legacy… the guy who dealt Jesus Montero.
Finding elite bats is way harder than elite arms. M’s have 3 huge pitching prospects who aren’t far away plus Felix. Great deal for the M’s. How often do you get the chance to trade for a Jesus Montero with 6 yrs of control ahead of him???
by ThnkGoodnessforHowieRose on Jan 15, 2012 12:38 AM EST up reply actions
No!
M’s do have 3 great pitching prospects…..as do the DBacks and Cardinals. but…….
KC was in exactly the same position a year ago with Duffy, Montgomery, Lamb, Odorizzi and look at how that worked out.
It does seem odd that teams are more likely to have 3 “elite” arms than 3 “elite” hitters (I can only think of 2010 KC with Hosmer, Moustakas and Myers) but the attrition rate swings it to the bats and it’s not even close at the major league level, which is where you have to consider Pineda and Montero, even if Montero is still a rookie.
Look at a top 50 list and by the time you get to the bottom with the likes of Greinke and ARod, it breaks down to just 10 starters for 40 hitters.
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof. -John Kenneth Galbraith, economist (1908-2006)
tangent warning
but fwiw, i don’t really think KC’s trio of Duffy, Montgomery, Lamb (i guess you can tack on Odorizzi as well as a fourth piece) were comparable to the M’s and Dbacks’s three great pitching prospects
three A- for the Mariners (two A- and a borderline to be fair), and an A and two A- for the Dbacks vs. three B+ for the Royals is a pretty big difference
by blue bulldog on Jan 15, 2012 4:36 AM EST up reply actions
Yup
You can add Pittsburgh to the list this year with more “elite” arms, and I might even be forgetting another team.
Even then, a statement like “finding elite bats is way harder than elite arms” only works at the prospect level as it’s hard to dispute that the bats are more likely to develop.
Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof. -John Kenneth Galbraith, economist (1908-2006)
Crazy trade
My mind is still blown. Unless Montero somehow sticks at Catcher, which I guess is possible (props to tarheels24 above), I see this as a major win for the Yankees.
Montero was expendable and Pineda wasn’t as much, plus the Mariners gave up Campos as well to get Montero and Noesi (who I don’t like that much).
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jan 14, 2012 3:25 PM EST reply actions
Montero expendable?!?
huh?
by ThnkGoodnessforHowieRose on Jan 15, 2012 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
For the Yankees he was
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on Jan 15, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions
i don't think the Yankees
have any other bat prospects who are even close. Moreover, I don’t think that any elite bat prospect is “expendable.” That doesn’t really make any sense. Sure the Yankees will be able to score runs w/o Montero, but that’s another matter… doesn’t make him expendable. Their system has more top arm prospects than bats.
by ThnkGoodnessforHowieRose on Jan 15, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions
If Montero was expendable for the Yankees,
wouldn’t that make Pineda somewhat expendable because the Mariners are so deep with the young pitching? Is the drop from Pineda to Hultzen/Walker/Paxton greater than the drop from what Montero could be (even as a DH) to whoever they fill his old spot in the lineup with?
Both teams traded from a position of strength to fill a position of weakness.
I'm not so sure
Everyone seems to harp on Montero’s position issues and the fact that he didn’t hit as high as everyone wanted in his last half-season at Triple A (which is about as nitpicky as one can get) but everyone ignores stuff about Pineda such as his big home/road splits and his fall in the 2nd half…fact is, both guys are really talented, but (as with all young players) they aren’t without flaws. If the M’s get some guy who is a DH for the next 5 years but hits like a monster, I don’t see how they lose.
Win/WIn or Lose/Lose?
I like the idea of both teams trading strengths for weaknesses, and that both sides get strong talents makes this one to watch for the next 5 years or so.
With that said, putting a RH hitter in Safeco and a flyball RHP in Yankee Stadium gives this the potential for both teams to be a little disappointed in the results.
They both have the track records that point to better performance than most, but their new stadiums could very well hold them back in the traditional statistical categories that don’t correct for that, and could leave a fair number of fans wanting more.
That's my fear
As a baseball fan – and Mariners fan – I have mixed feelings about the trade but I could see it working out.
As a fantasy baseball player who owns both Montero and Pineda in a dynasty league, I absolutely hate it. I think it really hurts both their fantasy values.
Fantasy Value
I think it depends on your league categories. Montero is certainly hurt some at AVG/SLG, but I’m pretty confident that the Mariners are going to find him more PA than the Yankees, so his composite numbers could be just about the same (RBI compensated some by hitting 3rd or 4th rather than 7th/8th).
Pineda will certainly get more wins in New York, his ERA and WHIP will certainly take a hit because of the ballpark and competition in the AL East.
Competition?
Pineda’s divisional competition with the Mariners: Rangers, Angels, A’s
Pineda’s divisional competition with Yankees: Red Sox, Rays, Blue Jays, Orioles.
Montero is the kind of RH hitter that would succeed in Safeco
He has more than enough power to put it over the fence, and most of his power is to right field, where Safeco isn’t nearly as bad. Combined with his doubles power, and I see him hitting .300/.380/.550 in his peak
The winners were the teams
and the losers were the players (the principals). Montero and PIneda may actually perform slightly worse in their new environs/lineups than they otherwise would have had they stayed put.
"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever
"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.
by nostocksjustbonds on Jan 14, 2012 4:34 PM EST reply actions
Win/Win
I see this trade as a win for both teams because the Yankees have a lot of aging sluggers under contract who will need to DH several years down the road, and Pineda fills an immediate hole in their rotation — and will for years. He also has dominant stuff that will play well in the post season.
The Mariners future rotation of Walker/Hultzen/Paxton would look that much more impressive if Pineda was in the mix, but with those three elite arms coming along the Mariners can afford to trade a potential ace for a guy with Miguel Cabrera potential. The Mariners have had a hard time attracting big bats, so this will stick a big, fat, cost controlled bat in the middle of their lineup for years to come.
Montero vs. Cabrera
Montero just turned 22 and by that age Miguel had close to 1000 MLB AB’s including a 33 HR season. I would feel better if his minors walk rate was a little higher but I’m hoping for the best. He automatically becomes the M’s best RH hitter, so this should help a team that
is pretty vulnerable vs. LHP.
Maybe it’s just the trust factor. M’s traditionally have made questionable deals with big market teams, Buhner excepted. The ghost of Heathcliff Slocumb’s faded fastball still haunts the franchise.
I just don't think it's fair to lump unreasonable expectations on a young player barely in the majors.
Miggy Cabrera? C’mon. That’s setting yourself up for disappointment. I’d TAKE IT, but I’m not expecting it at all.
Fans are typically idiots.
by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jan 15, 2012 3:40 AM EST up reply actions
I think that you need to add a third option- Even/too soon to tell.
I know it seems like a cop-out, but that’s the way I feel. Most trades, you can get an idea of present value received and given. In this trade, both players are elite young players. While Pineda has a major league track record, he also carries the inherent injury risk that pitchers, particularly young pitchers, get hurt. He also has yet to develop an offspeed pitch needed to handle lefties in Yankee Stadium. Presently, with no further development, I think he’s a good 3rd starter. If he can make his change a plus pitch, stay healthy, and refine his command a little (he has good control/few walks, but he seemed to hang a few meatballs later on in the season as he tired out), I think he’s a LEGIT Ace (not a Gio Gonzalez “ace”).
As for Montero, there are two questions- 1. Can he pass as a catcher? and 2. Is his bat truly elite or simply good? If the answers are yes and elite, he’s a potential hall of famer. If it’s no and elite, he’s a top-tier 1B/DH. If the answers are yes and good, he’s a solid regular, and if the answers are no and good, he’s a low-end 1B/DH option for a bad offense.
Overall, when factoring risk v. reward… ignoring injury risk, I think Pineda’s a safer bet than Montero. As I said, he’s already a good third starter. Even if he doesn’t develop into a “better” pitcher, you still have a very valuable asset. He’s like a younger, pre-arb AJ Burnett or Brandon Morrow. Burnett and Morrow didn’t develop much in the majors, but Justin Verlander did, and he fits the profile of a great fastball/slider guy, except he developed his secondary stuff and improved his command.
While Montero’s non-injury-related floor is more of a low-end regular, I believe that the odds of him becoming an elite masher are similar to Pineda’s odds of becoming a perennial Cy Young Candidate.
I would imagine that one day, it will be obvious who won this trade. But if anyone says today that either team clearly won the trade, I wouldn’t agree. Fascinating deal, though.
by mkries on Jan 14, 2012 5:55 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Yanks win all the way
Montero is most likely a DH. We all know the Yanks desperately needed SP. And, as has been said, with the packages that had to be given up for young SP this year, the M’s got fleeced.
Why couldn't Montero be a 1B?
I think this is a pretty fair deal for both teams. If Smoak doesn’t improve this year the Mariners have his replacement and if he does improve they have two bats every team will want. Sounds good to me for both teams!!!!
Big Sexy
Follow KBR and Dewey on Twitter! @KBRandDewey
by King Billy Royal on Jan 15, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by 
















