Not sure if there has been something similar to this on here (probably has) but I have been thinking a lot about how some of the current top prospects in baseball compare with what earlier prospects have done. would a 2011 Matt Moore be ranked ahead of a 2007 Homer Bailey? Would a 2006 Delmon Young be more hyped than Mike Trout is? I feel like prospecting has become more of a science even in the last 3-4 years than it was earlier in the decade. This could just be me but I feel like a lot more of the top prospects have actually panned out and I don't know if that is becasue we have simply had a wave of incredibly talented prospects in the last few years or because of better evaluation of young baseball talent. Like I said above there may already be a post discussing this, but I haven't been visiting the site as much in the last year and a half or so, so I apologize if I have just wasted anyone's time.