Scouting Report: Brett Lawrie, 3B, Toronto Blue Jays
Brett Lawrie at the plate
I went to Omaha on Sunday, May 22nd, and took a close look at Blue Jays prospect Brett Lawrie.
Brett Lawrie, 3B, Las Vegas 51s: Yesterday was the Brett Lawrie Show: he went 2-for-4 with two homers and four RBI. In his last 10 games, Lawrie is hitting .375/.490/.800 with nine walks and four homers. On the season, he's at .346/.403/.633 with 11 homers and nine steals in 10 attempts.
Based on his track record, and what I saw Sunday afternoon, I am convinced that Brett Lawrie has everything needed to be a superstar. The only things that could get in the way are injuries or his own personality.
There were three cautions for Lawrie entering 2011: his plate discipline, his position, and his attitude. We'll start with the hitting.
Lawrie has always shown me good bat speed when I've seen him, but he's taken that up a notch this year. He's closed his stance slightly compared to previous observations, and his bat looks even quicker now. He is working counts MUCH more effectively than when I've see him in the past. One of his homers (the one pictured) was a long arching shot pulled to left center. The second one was an opposite field homer, a result of Lawrie making strong contact on an outside pitch and driving it perfectly. The one thing that was keeping him from fully tapping his natural power was impatience, but he showed a terrific eye in this game, and this seems deliberate: after posting a weak 4/23 BB/K in April, he's at 11/13 in May. When he was in high school, scouting reports indicated that plate discipline was one of his strengths. He didn't show much of that in his first two years of pro ball, but he is suddenly controlling the zone again. If he keeps that up, look out.
Defense: Lawrie converted to third base from second base this year. The results so far: a .922 fielding percentage, although combined with a strong 3.02 range factor. If you look at the boxscore for this game, you'll see that Lawrie made two errors. But that's not the whole story.
One of his errors went like this: the ball was hit to the gap between the third baseman and shortstop. Lawrie was playing slightly off the bag, but ranged far to his left, well into the normal territory of the shortstop. The SS seemed to misread the ball but Lawrie got to it, backhanded it, did a quick almost 360 pivot, and fired the ball to the first baseman one step ahead of the runner. His release was very quick and it was a very athletic play. However, the throw was off target and pulled the first baseman off the bag. The key here was that Lawrie showed great range and quickness to his left, and with more experience at the position that throw might well have been on target.
Another impressive play: Lawrie was playing back. The hitter made a perfectly placed bunt, Lawrie charged, scooped the ball, and made an off-balance, on-target throw to first base. The runner beat the throw for a single, but again Lawrie showed the requisite quickness and athleticism for the position.
My view of Lawrie's defense is this: he has more than enough range and athleticism for third base, has a quick release, and a strong enough arm. He just needs more experience.
He also runs well with more speed than you'd expect given his size. I didn't get to see him do anything on the bases other than a home run trot, but he's 9-for-10 this year with steals, much better than the 30/43 mark he posted last year.
Attitude: This is the big knock on Lawrie and one of the reasons (it is said) that the Brewers were willing to trade him.
Obviously there is only so much you can tell from just watching a player, but I kept my eye on him most of the game, even he wasn't the center of attention or involved in a play. Lawrie fidgets a lot. He seems to radiate intensity and energy. This can be somewhat off-putting, like when he fidgets during the national anthem when everyone else is still, but the upside is that his body looked alive far more than everyone else on the field, with the possible exception of Lorenzo Cain. Comparing Lawrie with Moustakas for example, Lawrie just oozes energetic power compared to Moustakas' solid, staid affect.
Lawrie's intensity manifested itself negatively when he got into an argument with the umpire about a check-swing strike three call. It looked like he almost got ejected (which would have really irritated me, it was just the third inning), but he pulled himself back in time and stayed in the game. There are all kinds of stories/rumors about Lawrie's personality and antics, but he plays with fire on the field.
To summarize, I really believe in Lawrie's bat. He has the tools to be a good defensive third baseman with experience. He plays very hard on the field. You don't have to be a nice guy to be a great player. If he avoids injuries, grows up a bit and learns to channel his energy and intensity, he's going to be a monster.
60 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As a Blue Jays fan
This sort of makes my day. Great write-up.
The personality stuff irks me, just because having players that are unlikable takes a way a bit of the fun of cheering for a team, but hopefully it’s related to the intensity, as you mention, and as he matures, that will become less of an issue.
Follow-up question
Based on this report, where would you rank Lawrie among the top position-player prospects in the Minors?
lawrie
Well I don’t know for sure, I’d have to analyze a bunch of other guys. Keep in mind that I him ranked at 12 pre-seaon, which is higher than most people ranked him. But he’d be even higher now.
I know I would put Harper, Trout, Machado, and Hosmer ahead of Lawrie. He’d be right there with Moustakas and Belt. So he’s in the top ten and perhaps top five. Lawrie is more athletic than Mous and has more versatilty than Belt, but his makeup isn’t as well-regarded.
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
brown
gotta put dom brown in there somewhere too.
Harper
Trout
Machado
Hosmer
Lawrie
Brown
Mous
Belt
something like that
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Thirtienth
I guess you’d support my ranking of #13 overall for Brett Lawrie, before the season started huh John?
Here’s how I had the position players ranked . . .
Harper
Trout
Myers
Nick Franklin
Moustakas
Machado
Hosmer
Lawrie
Hak Ju Lee
I had Franklin, Machado, lawrie, and Lee ranked higher than anyone else and I’ll stick by all of them still, even though Franklin isn’t playing great thus far.
You a bit down on Wil Myers? Not a Moustakas fan?
"if it first you don't suceed, maybe you just suck" - Kenny Powers
I believe it was Keith Law who said he expects Lawrie to get the call to the majors soon, do you agree John?
lawrie
his bat is ready. If they are willing to accept the fact that he’ll make errors, he can be up at any time.
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Anything would be better than Encarnacion
E5 hasn’t played there a lot this year but been horrible when he has. All the Jays other 3B options(if you exclude Bautista) are really utility guys. Figure they’re waiting out the Super-2 period and Lawrie will be up.
During Spring Training
I watched Lawrie at 3rd in a few televised games – You could see the range then. It was WOW. At this point his defense reminds me of a spectacular – but very young – SS who is learning where the outside of his range is – he’s making errors on balls most guys don’t even get to. As soon as his muscle memory knows what he can get to and make the play on – WOW!
Also, I hear he can hit a bit. His swing seems (to me) to be nearly Bautista fast .
John – Is Lawire gonna be a 30+ homer guy during his prime?
lawrie
I think he has that kind of power in his bat.
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions
defense
and i agree about the defense, totally.
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Defense
I have to disagree with you about his defense. Yes he has the athleticism and range, but his hands are just ok and his throwing is sub par. I was at the Thursday game of that Omaha/LV series, and did not like what I saw. I think he can improve slightly, but he is below avg defensively for me.
lawrie
I think the throwing will improve with experience. As for the hands, he’s never going to be a gold glove, but with that sort of range, if he gradually cuts down on the errors with experience, he’ll be fine there.
But that’s my opinion. :) He looked very good yesterday even with the two errors. If he didn’t look good on Thursday, maybe that balances him out to average?
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions
In Rogers Center
He should hit 30 homers annually
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on May 23, 2011 8:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Your report on his defense is very encouraging
It’s Lawrie’s glove that always seem to knock him down many prospect lists, so hearing that it could be good enough to stay at 3B is a very good sign. His improved plate discipline is also very encouraging. This statement surprised me:
Lawrie has always shown me good bat speed when I’ve seen him, but he’s taken that up a notch this year. He’s closed his stance slightly compared to previous observations, and his bat looks even quicker now.
One of Lawrie’s biggest strengths was his bat speed, which was why I thought he had 25+ HR power. Hearing that he’s IMPROVED his bat speed makes me giddy!
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
lawrie
he was lightning-fast yesterday.
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
This guy is going to be a stud
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
I just hopes he sticks at 3rd for my fantasy team :D
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on May 23, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah
thats kind of what I am thinking too
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on May 23, 2011 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions
braun
that is a decent comp with the bat.
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions
John
Now that you have seen Lawrie . . . and are raving about him . . .and you obviouisly have a very good understanding of age relative to league . . . can you attempt to explain why Lawrie would be a substantially lower ranked plasyer than Dustin Ackley?
I just could never figure this out. I have seen both of them play SECOND base, before Lawrie switched, and I thought Lawrie was clearly better there as well. It was just a position that didn’t suit his skills.
"if it first you don't suceed, maybe you just suck" - Kenny Powers
Ackley
Meh. Lawrie’s going to hit for a lot more (and may be a better hitter, minus the eye) but I don’t see that we need to bust Ackley’s chops over Lawrie’s recent successes. I’ve seen both and like both- Ackley blows a little more hot-cold with the bat, it seems at this point. Wieters/Posey/Tomato.
Oh, goyo70
Clearly you didn’t get the memo that this is how players are evaluated now. You take a player you “liked more” than “everyone else” and randomly compare them to a player who was “vastly overrated” by “everyone else” because it’s all about lists, and rankings, and why you’re smarter than “everyone else”. lol
by blackoutyears on May 24, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Nope
It sin’t actually. We can talk all day about players I was wrong about If you want to. You dont care about lists, or rankings, thats fine. But I DO.. That isn’t all, that matters but, i am completely interested in why we – as a group – rank people the way we do. And even where we do.
In fact, I even want to discuss why we make mistakes when we make them. I think its an interesting discussion. Im not saying Im better because I ranked a player, Lawrie, higher than Ackley. Im saying, what was the reasoning for ranking Ackley higher and was that flawed reasoning?
"if it first you don't suceed, maybe you just suck" - Kenny Powers
I'm sorry
I’ve checked the thread and I don’t see the part where I was talking to you. As you were.
by blackoutyears on May 24, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Getting there
If you weren’t talking to me, why don’t you try not talking about me as well? Or are you that obsessed? As you were
"if it first you don't suceed, maybe you just suck" - Kenny Powers
Funny part about that comp
Braun always had the athleticism to stick at 3B. He just never worked on his D enough, and Milwaukee eventually moved him to LF.
Time will tell whether Lawrie will work at his D at 3B hard enough. There’s no way of knowing that for sure though without talking to the coaching staff in LV.
lol
your right
Lance Berkman= Awesome, CJ Wilson= Jack@$$
Minor League Ball's 2010 Rookie of the Year Poster
If you didn't know by now, my screen name is sarcastic
by mathisrocks5 on May 23, 2011 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions
I think that omission will be their biggest regret from that list
"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- Niels Bohr
PP
I won’t bash other people’s lists. Certainly I’ve been wrong about guys before. And who knows, maybe Lawrie will wash out and make this article look stupid!
by John Sickels on May 23, 2011 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand this
but, we’re talking about a list of 100 prospects. I have to believe, even the most conservative lists would have at least had him at 80-90, but to leave him off altogether was pretty eye-opening, even before his breakout.
by asyouwish33 on May 23, 2011 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions
it wasn't that bad
Lawrie was coming off a good not great offensive season and looked like he was bound for a corner OF. Knowing what we knew at the time, I think it was a defensible decision.
The year before they had him at 40
He was a teenager in AA. Sorry, I don’t buy it. But I still enjoy reading project prospect. I think they do a good job over there. Like John said, we have our mulligans.
by asyouwish33 on May 23, 2011 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Personality
I don’t follow top prospects as intense as other people, but what is wrong with Lawries personality? Is he just super competitive, or does he start fights? Bad Attitude? Gotten a DWI or caught with Drugs?
Kind of ridiculous
I think I have a few buddies who might have the same facebook images that they may (or may not) regret.
by asyouwish33 on May 23, 2011 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I think it shows how young he really is
He seems to have matured and will continue to do so… But it’s good that he has a fire in him.
by Minor Leaguer on May 24, 2011 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions
John
How did you like the new ballpark? Prefer Rosenblatt?
I'm just a dude who likes talking to other dudes about other dudes.........in a straight way.
by tj.hendricks on May 23, 2011 11:58 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
regarding attitude, work ethic, and etc – if you listen to Alex Anthopoulos, he’s just as gifted there as he is on the field. Sure he has a massive ego (apparently) but that fuels him to prove he’s the best.
AA commented that when they sent Mike Mordaci (sp) to Vegas to help him fine tune his defense, then also told him they wanted to see him be more selective at the plate and Lawrie pretty much just flipped a switch and stopped making errors (presumably in response to the coaching) and started seeing more pitches and walking more.
It’s almost as if the guy can just decide to be better and go out and be better just like that.
I think the attitude question was more a matter of whether he’d pout or be angry when he didn’t break camp with the jays. He’d said upon leaving the Brewers system he was “done with the minors” which seemed very arrogant and that set off bells for some folks. also, apparently, he declined to play winter ball when the Brewers asked him to.
BUT it ain’t bragging if you can do it and so far he’s put up performance to prove his point instead of showing a bad attitude.
GM says nice things about prospect?
noooooooooooo kidding.
R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9
http://twitter.com/doublestix
Keith Law
I recall hearing Keith Law on the radio in Toronto a month ago or so, and while he didn’t go into much detail, he said that Lawrie’s make-up issues were far less apparent since coming to the Jays. Just one man’s take, but that made me optimistic.
how soon will he be called up?
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
i still think they want to wait on him.
I think the next guy to be called up will be Snider. He has started to swing a pretty good bat and from what i hear show some pop again. I see him being called up and then the next guy in line would be him.
As a jays fans im so excited with our futur, the likes of Thames, Lawrie, Snider, Goose, D’arneaud, Mcguire.
Brett Lawrie is the man
Still wish the Twins drafted him over Aaron Hicks in 2008……… for a while there i was thinking the Twins are smarter than me/we but now they’re not looking too good with Lawrie looking like a top 20 prospect & all the while playing 3B.
+ he’s canadian , Morneau Crain Tosoni et all
Glen Perkins is throwing 97 MPH in 2011 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! what the hell is he on?
Big fan of Juerys Familia and his repitoire
by SteveHoffmanSlowey on May 25, 2011 8:10 PM EDT reply actions
So
someone correct me if I’m wrong. From a fantasy prospective (defense only matters as far as switching positions) this guy is going to be similar to David Wright?
Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend
by McCutchenIsTheTruth on May 27, 2011 11:55 AM EDT reply actions
Thats what people think
http://rotoprofessor.com/baseball/?p=10063
A whole article from rotoprofessor stating just that

by 















