Interview with Oakland Athletics General Manager Billy Beane
Thursday morning I spoke with Oakland Athletics General Manager Billy Beane by telephone. I asked him a few general philosophical questions, then a few specific questions about the Athletics.
SICKELS: Billy, thanks for taking the time to talk with me today. Generally speaking, when looking at pitchers and trying to judge their current value and future potential, do you have a personal preference for pitchers with velocity, or pitchers with command? Obviously you want a pitcher who has both, but if the choice is between a guy with plus velocity/stuff but shaky command, or a guy with average velocity/stuff and good command, which way would you lean?
BEANE: Well, that's a tough question to answer. It really is a case-by-case situation where you have to judge the pitcher on his own merits. You look at the velocity and his stuff, obviously, and you look at his command obviously, but you also look at his delivery, his size, his health record, everything.
Both velocity and command are components among others. Velocity is related to strikeouts, but they aren't always the same thing. What I find myself looking for from pitchers is the swing-and-miss. They can get that from velocity, but they can also get that by changing speeds and deception. There are some pitchers who have plus velocity but don't get the swing-and-miss, and other pitchers who don't have big radar readings but do get the strikeouts.
There is a general idea that velocity can't be taught but that command can. I think there is something to that, but there are exceptions.
SICKELS: In your own system, you have pitchers like Shawn Haviland and Paul Smyth who did improve their velocity compared to where they were in college.
BEANE: That's right, it does happen. And of course there are plenty of examples of pitchers with velocity who didn't have command, but who did develop command later. So that's what I mean when I say it is a case-by-case thing. Velocity or command isn't something that I look at as a rule of thumb, other than that we look for a pitcher who gets strikeouts, no matter how he gets them.
SICKELS: Can you walk us through an average day for you during the off-season? How busy is it compared to the regular season?
BEANE:Well, this job never ends. It depends on what part of the off-season you are talking about. In October, you work on things like contracts for next year, target lists for free agents, beginnings of trade talks. November is similar, but you might start preparing for arbitration and the prep for the winter meetings.
The period between the end of October and Christmas is very busy. It will slow down for a few weeks after Christmas to about the middle of January and that's the point where you might be able to take a vacation with your family, but even then you stay in touch every day, and it isn't long before you have to get ready for spring training. Even on days when you technically work 9-to-5, you are still talking phone calls on the way to the office or on the way home.
SICKELS: When you make a decision about a player, a signing or a trade, obviously both scouting and statistics play into it. But is there any role for "gut feeling" or "intuition"?
BEANE: That depends on how you define intuition. Some people would define intuition or gut feeling as the same thing as a wild guess. We have to be more objective.
SICKELS: Well, I was thinking of intuition more in the sense of your brain or your subconscious, not to get Freudian on you, but some part of your mind that is involved in pattern recognition that might notice something in a player that you don't think about consciously right away, but that comes into your awareness as an "aha!" insight.
BEANE: Oh, I would agree with that, yeah. Intuition, like what you are talking about, is what I would call the benefit of experience. You have all this past experience in your mind stored away, and something current will trigger a memory of that experience, I can see that expressed as intuition, and yeah, there is certainly a place for that, though when something like that happens, we'll still try to find something objective to back it up.
SICKELS: With the basic agreement up for negotiation as we approach 2012, what do you think of the idea of trading draft picks?
BEANE: I think it would be a great idea. I have always been in favor of that, it would create more interest in the draft for the fans, and as a GM anything that improves my flexibility is a good thing.
SICKELS: Will it happen? It always gets talked about but it never gets implemented.
BEANE: Well, I can't say for sure obviously, we'll have to see what gets negotiated. I would say that it is a better than 50/50 chance, but it is not guaranteed. We'll just have to see.
SICKELS: You've made some roster changes this year, bringing in David DeJesus and Josh Willingham, adding Hideki Matsui. With Daric Barton entrenched at first base, and with Ryan Sweeney and Conor Jackson around, does this make Chris Carter the odd man out?
BEANE: You never know what will happen when you go into spring training. I would rather have too much depth than not enough depth. . .people get hurt, have bad springs. With Chris, we remain very high on him, but Barton is the man at first base and we want Chris to get more outfield time. He is a good enough athlete to handle it, he just needs more experience defensively.
SICKELS: You remain high on the bat though?
BEANE: Certainly.
SICKELS: He had adjustment problems in the majors but played much better after the 0-for-33 beginning.
BEANE: Yes, he did. Carter has a history of slow starts when he reaches a new level, so we didn't expect he would dominate in the majors right away. We didn't expect him to go 0-for-33 either, but he adapted and stayed level mentally, and it wasn't a surprise to us that he did so. That fits his pattern.
SICKELS: Another outfield prospect, Michael Taylor, really struggled last year in Triple-A. But I just can't believe that what he did in the Phillies system was a fluke. What happened with Taylor?
BEANE: Michael is a great athlete, and he's also very intelligent. But like many smart players, he overthinks things when something is wrong. There were also some injuries involved, and the combination of the injuries and a slow start just built up. But we don't judge him just on one season, we look over his whole career. There was a lot of focus and attention on him last year and I think he pressed over it. With less pressure this year he can do better. We still like him a lot.
SICKELS: Your starting four looks set with Trevor Cahill, Gio Gonzalez, Dallas Braden, and Brett Anderson. How is Anderson's arm?
BEANE: Brett finished strong and is ready to go, we aren't worried about his health at all.
SICKELS: Gonzalez really put it together last year. Even when he struggled in past seasons, he struck a lot of people out, but the rest of it came together.
BEANE: Yeah, with Gonzalez we were looking over his whole track record like I mentioned before. The strikeouts were always there and he just needed some time and patience to bring the rest of it together.
SICKELS: Who is the fifth starter? You have many candidates. .. Tyson Ross, Bobby Cramer, Rich Harden, Brandon McCarthy, maybe Josh Outman.
BEANE: Yeah, we brought in several candidates and we fell like we have more depth than most teams do for the fifth starter job. We'll just have to see what happens in spring training, but any of those guys could get it. We know what Harden and McCarthy can do when they are healthy, but Cramer was really impressive late last year and will get a shot too. Anybody who pitches well in Mexico and the PCL needs to be looked at. Josh looked great in instructional league and looks fully recovered from surgery. We like our depth.
SICKELS: Any update on Pedro Figueroa's recovery from Tommy John? He was an intriguing prospect before he got hurt.
BEANE: Rehab is going well, no setbacks. We expect he will pitch in competition sometime in 2011, but recovery to full form can take two years so we won't rush it.
SICKELS: One final question. Eric Sogard looks like a nice sleeper prospect to me. Can he play shortstop?
BEANE: He will get the opportunity to do so in spring training. We like him a lot, he has a good mixture of skills.
17 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why in the world is he not concerned about Anderson's health?
It's because he derived his torque from the buttocks -- cityplANner
Because ...
… he’s a GM talking to a reporter/analyst, that’s why.
"Most overrated prospect in the minors." -- Bravesin07 on Madison Bumgarner
by criminal type on Feb 14, 2011 9:35 AM EST up reply actions
Because if someone
who’s desperate for pitching wants Anderson then it’ll be easier to trade him…
World Series attitude, champagne bottle life, nothing every changes so tonight is like tomorrow night.
Carter/MTaylor
I just don’t see the point in signing Hideki Matsui for Oakland. Obviously, Billy Beane et al must think that Chris Carter needs some additional work at AAA, but I don’t see the point in blocking him so definitively (at least initially). I don’t think Carter ever hits for BA, but I think his middle of the order potential is still undeniable.
As for Michael Taylor, sheesh, I’m not sure. A lot of the bloom appears to be off the rose, but I still agree with John that there’s something there (right?). He’ll go back to the PCL, but he’s even more blocked than Carter as Josh Willingham & David DeJesus should man the corner OF spots. Taylor doesn’t have Carter’s upside offensively but he figures to be a better defender in the OF. He’s also a year or so older than Carter, so this will be a pivotal campaign for Taylor.
Blocked?
Matsui, DeJesus, Crisp, and Willingham are all playing the last year of their contracts. Plus, don’t those 4 guys get hurt an awful lot?
Carter & Taylor haven’t earned promotions. One or the other (or both) will be on the 2012 Opening Day roster… It seems that Beane believes in younger pitchers, but will take it really slow with Power guys. and it will benefit the A’s to have Carter & Taylor around from ages 25-30 (Carter) & 26-31 (Taylor). Power really develops in those years for most players.
by Colorado Fan on Feb 14, 2011 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
I agree...
I found it confusing that they brought in so many OF’s. However, like Colorado said above, most of those guys are FA’s after the year, so it appears Taylor and Carter will get their shots assuming they perform well this season. There’s also DH AB’s to be had, so it seems like they will let the hot hands play this season, decide who they want to keep, and start mixing in the youngsters.
Arguably the worst thing a low-budget team can do is play prospects before they ready.
Why waste one of those cheap, 0-3 year, $400K seasons with a year of sub-replacement performance?
Better to wait a year until Carter/Taylor have MLE’s that suggest that they can be league-average players.
The Oakland A's: If you have a no-trade clause in your contract, we're in it.
by notsellingjeans on Feb 14, 2011 9:22 PM EST up reply actions
No Michael Ynoa question?
Just kidding, John. Awesome interview, thanks for posting it and thanks to Billy for giving it.
My usual Padres-centric post:
Why is Sogard highly regarded now that he is no longer with the Padres? He didn’t do anything to hurt himself as a Padres farmhand and he didn’t do anything outrageous as an A’s prospect to deserve new recognition…
Random Sogard factoid for you: When Sogard was with the A+ Lake Elsinore Storm in 2008, when the minor league season ended he led ALL Padres players (including Adrian Gonzalez) in XBH (65).
I hated Sogard’s inclusion in the A’s-Padres trade in Jan. 2010 and I hated Cole Figueroa’s inclusion in the trade this offseason… The Padres do a better job drafting and developing talent their reputation suggests – they’ve just failed spectactularly on first round picks (Bush, Carrillo, Antonelli, Schmidt, Dystra…) to earn the rep.
-peter
Sogard
I watched him play at ASU and am familiar with him back to his days at Thunderbird High School here in Phx.
If Sogard is your SS you are in trouble. He has pop for a little guy, but range, speed, and arm strength are not his strong suits.
FWIW, he was worse defensively at ASU than post season goat Brooks Conrad
Isn't Lake Elsinore one of those ludicrous California League parks
which have games where the teams score 50 runs?
I like Sogard and think he’s generally underrated (certainly wouldn’t call him “highly regarded,” unless you mean by A’s bloggers), but I can’t put much faith in power numbers in that environment.
"We don't want our people to be preoccupied with seminude, crazy men jumping up and down who are chasing an inflated object," said Sheik Mohamed Osman Arus, head of operations for the Hizbul Islam insurgent group.
No, not at all
In fact, it’s 425 to LC. Lake Elsinore is a without question, a pitchers’ park in a hitters’ league. In fact, most of the parks in the CAL are nuetral to pitcher-centric but the league is skewed by 2 parks (High Desert & Lancaster).
-peter
Great Interview John
My Thanks for posting as well; Thx to BB for accomodating, too.
I really liked that you asked him about using intuition & his response was interesting – not just that he uses it in the context that you suggested, but that he will then look to back it up objectively and not just discount it. Neat to hear that said by him. Makes me think that he is very thorough (I know, no surprise). Thx again, really well done, good questions.

by 















