Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Prospects in the Andrew Bailey Trade

Andrew Bailey pitches against the Seattle Mariners on April 8, 2010 in Oakland, California. He was traded from the Oakland Athletics to the Boston Red Sox on December 28th, 2011  (Photo by Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images)

Prospects in the Andrew Bailey Trade.

The Oakland Athletics continued their active off-season with another major trade this evening, sending closer Andrew Bailey and outfielder Ryan Sweeney to the Boston Red Sox, in exchange for outfielder Josh Reddick, right-handed pitcher Raul Alcantara, and first baseman Miles Head.

Reddick is no longer a rookie and most fans should be familiar with him: he's young at age 24 (25 in February) and hit .280/.327/.457 in 254 at-bats for the Red Sox in 2011. The two prospects here are Alcantara and Head, so let's take a look.

Star-divide

Raul Alcantara, RHP: Alcantara is a 6-3, 180 pound right-handed pitcher, born December 4th, 1992 in Barahona, Dominican Republic. The Red Sox signed him as a free agent in 2009 and he made his North American debut in '11. He posted a 0.75 ERA with a 36/6 K/BB in 48 innings for the Gulf Coast League Red Sox, earning a promotion to Lowell in the New York-Penn League at the end of August. He was hit harder there, giving up 25 hits and 14 runs (6.23 ERA) in 17 innings over four starts, with a 14/6 K/BB, but he was young for the level at age 18.

Alcantara is a classic projection prospect. He already throws 90-95 MPH and should sustain his peak velocities more readily as he matures physically. His curveball and changeup are inconsistent, but they exist, which is more than a lot of pitchers his age can say. He throws strikes and keeps the ball down, collecting grounders at a decent clip and avoiding homers. He's only given up one homer in 126 professional innings. His strikeout rate is low for a guy with his kind of velocity at the lower levels, which indicates the need to improve his secondary stuff.

He's a Grade C+ prospect at this point and will need time to develop, at least three years from the majors.

Miles Head, 1B-3B: Head is a 6-0, 215 pound first baseman, a right-handed hitter and thrower, born May 2nd, 1991. He was drafted in the 26th round in 2009 from high school in Fayetteville, Georgia, but his draft position was deceptive. His signability was in question, and it took $335,000 to keep him away from college ball at the University of Georgia. He could have gone as high as the fourth round otherwise. Head split 2011 between Low-A Greenville (.338/.409/.612 in 66 games) and High-A Salem (.254/.328/.405 in 63 games), combining for 37 doubles, 22 homers, 50 walks, and 109 strikeouts.

Head features above-average power potential, but will have to prove that his swing and plate discipline will work against advanced pitching. He lacks the speed to play an outfield corner, and spent 2011 at first base. He has experience at third and may move back to the hot corner, where his arm will play well but his range may not.

Like Alcantara, Head is a Grade C+ type who has major league potential but still has things to prove. He could develop into a very productive slugger, but could also fizzle out as a Quadruple-A bat without a real position.


Comment 56 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Head

a lot like the typical Red Sox AAAA first basemen they develop. Bates, Anderson etc

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Follow me on Twitter - In Lax We Trust
The Lacrosse Radio Network - Unique Lacrosse Programming

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 28, 2011 10:33 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed

Yoenis Cespedes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW9ge8l3jY8

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Dec 29, 2011 12:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Isn't every Red Sox 1B

destined for AAAA when you have Adrian Gonzalez?

Ride the tiger...You can see his stripes but you know he's clean.

by James Westfall on Dec 29, 2011 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup

but this happened before they traded for him. Rizzo was the only 1B prospect of note for the past five years.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Follow me on Twitter - In Lax We Trust
The Lacrosse Radio Network - Unique Lacrosse Programming

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 29, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Not at all.

Anderson was an athlete who looked like a slugging 1B.

Head looks like he spends too much time on a couch. doesn’t look at all like an athlete, but has a quick bat. He may fizzle too but it would be for very different reasons.

by Rotofan on Dec 29, 2011 1:27 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Anderson

had one good year in AA. After that scouts started saying he had “doubles power”. How do you go from 30+ HR power to doubles power in less than a year?
His glove is soft and he GB% is way up. Not sold on him in the least. Oakland wouldn’t even take him for Rich Harden.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Follow me on Twitter - In Lax We Trust
The Lacrosse Radio Network - Unique Lacrosse Programming

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 29, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Harden deal fell through due to some more finite research into his medical records

Oakland would have been happy to take Lars Anderson at that time it seems (not to mention disburdening itself of the $500K or so Harden was in line to receive).

If your point is that Miles Head was likely more appealing to the A’s than Anderson as part of a package in terms of the Andrew Bailey deal, I do agree though.

by Matt0330 on Dec 29, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

No

Yup, the deal fell through. But remember that Oakland also would not make the move unless they got a PTBNL? The deal fell through anyways so it did not matter, but they wanted more in the deal before the medical reports were seen by Boston.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Follow me on Twitter - In Lax We Trust
The Lacrosse Radio Network - Unique Lacrosse Programming

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 29, 2011 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

the trade WAS announced as Anderson + PTBNL

Oakland got what they wanted, the trade was nixed on the Boston side of things.

by mrkupe on Dec 29, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

But Oakland would not take just Anderson and had demanded the PTBNL- that’s all I said

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Follow me on Twitter - In Lax We Trust
The Lacrosse Radio Network - Unique Lacrosse Programming

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 29, 2011 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

After that scouts started saying he had "doubles power"

Never heard anyone say this. He still shows plus raw power in batting practice all the time.

He’s also pretty athletic for a guy that size.

Lastly, Oakland DID in fact agree to trade him for Harden. The Sox nixed the deal after seeing Harden’s medicals.

by alskor on Dec 29, 2011 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

No, Oakland insisted on Anderson plus a PTBNL (rumored to be Alcantara)

When the Sox looked at Harden’s medicals they found to their astonishment that he was not completely healthy and asked Oakland to take just Anderson and get the PTBNL if Harden met certain performance milestones. Oakland refused and the deal fell apart at that point.

tko bira, masturbira -- Croatian proverb quoted by elcroata

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 29, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes.

Boston didn’t like his medical so they wanted to alter the already agreed deal. When Oakland refused Boston backed out.

by alskor on Dec 29, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup, that's what happened

and I remembered the rumor to be Brandon Workman as the player going over to Oakland because he had to be listed as a PTBNL as he had not been drafted since a full year.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Follow me on Twitter - In Lax We Trust
The Lacrosse Radio Network - Unique Lacrosse Programming

by Marisa Ingemi on Dec 29, 2011 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure you understand my point: Head is not much like Anderson as a prospect

So comparing the two isn’t terribly enlightening.

And you are incorrect about the Harden deal, which fell apart because the Red Sox didn’t want damaged goods.

by Rotofan on Dec 29, 2011 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

That would be

An improvement for the A’s from what they’ve been putting out there

"This has got to hurt"
"The Mets are going to be a powerhouse in 2010."

by Da.aron on Dec 29, 2011 3:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

John

Realistically, is there even an average chance for A’s fans to hope that Head can stick at 3B?

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Dec 28, 2011 10:38 PM EST reply actions  

3B

Head hasn’t played a game at 3B since 2009, when he played 9 games there. Why Olney referred to him as a 3B prospect, I have no idea. He’s exclusively been a 1B prospect.

by dbreer23 on Dec 28, 2011 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

There are real question whether he can play 1B; so 3B would seem out-of-the-question

He received poor reviews for his 1B defense as he has little range and struggles to pick low throws. He’s basically a non-athlete who can nonetheless get the barrel on the ball with a quick, slightly uppercut swing.

by Rotofan on Dec 29, 2011 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I like

Alcantara. Fairly interesting guy. Decent, but not great haul for the A’s. Could have done better, but added to the Cahill and Gio moves it looks solid

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Dec 28, 2011 10:46 PM EST reply actions  

I think it's pretty weak

When the best thing that can be said about the key player in the return seems to be that he’s ‘controllable’, it’s tough for me to be that optimistic.

I think Boston paid a practical pittance for 3 years of a relatively cost effective, knockout short reliever who will be more affordable than Jon Papelbon (or Ryan Madson/Francisco Cordero probably). Barring health (no small concern considering Andrew Bailey threw about half of his career IP during his rookie year), this is a clear & resounding win for Boston in my estimation.

by Matt0330 on Dec 29, 2011 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, couldn’t they have found a better prospect? This guy has been a major league closer now for several seasons.

by mytoemytoe on Dec 29, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I think it's a pretty comparable deal to the one that landed Marshall

and considering that Marshall > Bailey, though Bailey has two more years of control, I think they made out all right.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Dec 29, 2011 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah?

I dunno. I think Reddick and Wood are pretty comparable. Reddick’s floor is probably as a good 4th OF, his ceiling as an above average corner OF. Wood’s floor is probably as a fringe 5th starter, his ceiling as a solid mid-rotation innings eater.

Alcantara is young and all projection. Torreyes is the same age and probably has the same boom-bust quotient.

Head and Sappelt seem pretty similar, as I think both end up as AAAA/bench guys. I suppose if you are really high on Sappelt, this is where the deal tilts in favor of the Cubs. Personally, I think he’s an average CF for a few years at best, but more likely a decent 4th OF.

The Sox also got Sweeney in the deal, which doesn’t really change much in my estimation. He doesn’t provide much surplus value as a 2nd arb 4th OF.

So yeah, I think they are pretty similar.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Dec 29, 2011 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

But the A's would not have got Reddick without giving up Sweeney

So you can’t use that in your evaluation. Bailey for Alcantara and Head, and probably one other C+/B- type in place of Reddick had they kept Sweeney or Baily for Reddick and one of Alcantara or Head is probably more likely. At that point, neither one of those trades compete with the Marshall deal.
Although, I would say that even with the trade as is, I would take the Marshall deal. Sappelt is ahead of Head for me, as he has a much higher realistic value at this point as a 4th outfielder/platoon guy. Torreyes is way ahead of Alcantara for me. Wood and Reddick are pretty close. And the A’s still had to give up Sweeney, who still has value, at a sell low point.

by cookiedabookie on Dec 29, 2011 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it makes sense that what the Cubs got is overall a bit better than what the A's got

since Marshall > Bailey. My overall point is that both deals seem like fair value all around.

by Charlie Scrabbles on Dec 29, 2011 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

dude

quit acting like reddick and sweeney have the same value and cancel each other out of the deal. you’re completely high. reddick has more years of control and is a better player because he, for example, has any power at all. he was the centerpiece of the deal. it was not two trades, one with reddick for sweeney and then another with bailey for head and alcantara. that is not what happened

by wily mo on Dec 29, 2011 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

reining self in

actually you’re not saying exactly that. misread it / skimmed it too fast. thought i’d seen you say that last night.

so i guess i take that post back

by wily mo on Dec 29, 2011 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

No prob

Been guilty of doing the same before.

by cookiedabookie on Dec 29, 2011 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed on sweeney

physically he looks like the prototypical mlb player, 6’4" athletic, but stubborn plate approach. his defense regressed due to knee injuries. freakin cliff pennington and eric sogard could fluke into a hr, not sweeney. he seemed content with being an mlb player not much else. the sweeney i saw in 2007 was the same sweeney in 2011

by MagicMike23 on Dec 29, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

$$$

Bailey was scheduled to make somwhere in the neighborhood of $3.5M through arbitration. That may be the biggest point of the trade for the A’s. Other than that, the Sux got a bargain. There is no huge gamble with the players they gave up, and though Bailey has some elbow issues, he is likely a good pick up for them as insurance against the other offseason acquistions, like Melancon.

by Hairylady on Dec 29, 2011 6:19 AM EST reply actions  

Reddick

may still develop some… he is just 25 and may recover from the miserable August/September he had last year and learn to take a walk.

by Hairylady on Dec 29, 2011 6:26 AM EST reply actions  

Agreed

September wasn’t terrible, but August was certainly miserable. It will be interesting to see how he readjusts. His walk rate was WAY up in the minors this past year (14% BB, 7.8% for his career) so it is possible he changed his approach some. Even without improving much, he’s a decent player thanks to his defense and his power, and should have no trouble covering lots of ground in the Coliseum.

by acmcdowell on Dec 29, 2011 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Also can't forget his defense

Which is still a big asset in his new cavern/ballpark.

Joe, the reason we shout "WE ARE" and the reason the answer will always be "PENN STATE"

by Rogue Nine on Dec 29, 2011 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

he had a career .332 OBP in the minors. Its likely he will always struggle to get on base at the big leagues.

by Sniderlover on Dec 29, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Big Problem

for Boston will be having Bailey live up to expectations while pitching in that shoebox stadium, where even gnomes like Pedroia appear to be HOF hitters.

by Hairylady on Dec 29, 2011 6:51 AM EST reply actions  

Dustin Pedroia

A product of his environment if ever I saw one. Oh wait, that’s completely bonkos.

by Matt0330 on Dec 29, 2011 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=pedrodu01&year=Career&t=b

Looking at Pedroia’s career splits which are very close to even on PAs – you can see that he does get a jolt in 2Bs due to Fenway which affects his slugging, but he’s not exactly a terrible road hitter

by BobZupcic on Dec 29, 2011 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

When you're as financially hamstrung as the A's are, getting rid of the contract is more important....

…than who/what you get in return.

Bailey’s a dimestore closer coming off an elbow injury, the fact Beane got three players is a credit to him.

Beane didn’t trade three players, he traded three contracts, and got ten players in return.

Merry Christmas to him.

by Kelsdad on Dec 29, 2011 12:58 PM EST reply actions  

If the A's can't afford half a year of $3 million for Bailey

To wait for a better deal, than they might as well close up shop.

by cookiedabookie on Dec 29, 2011 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

what if Bailey suffers another injury and the A's are paying $3M to a player whose value is compromised?

I’m not sure they were going to get a better offer if what they were looking for was a close-to-the-majors starting caliber position player.

by mrkupe on Dec 29, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

"To wait for a better deal, than they might as well close up shop."

Careful what you wish for, Cookie..if the San Jose deal falls through, that’s exactly what will happen.

MLB will take over the A’s like they did the Expos and sell the team off for pennies on the dollar and they’ll end up in Vancouver or some such place.

by Kelsdad on Dec 29, 2011 1:48 PM EST reply actions  

It would be pretty interesting to see what happens if SJ doesn't happen.

My prediction would be New York.

tko bira, masturbira -- Croatian proverb quoted by elcroata

by WaddellCanseco on Dec 29, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

That's the first I've ever seen anyone mention NY...

But if baseball were a true free market, there’d be 5-6 teams in NY…

by okteds on Dec 29, 2011 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

San Antonio?

That would be interesting. California has five teams, why can’t Texas have three?

The bird is struggling out of the egg. The egg is the world. Whoever wants to be born, must first destroy a world.

by Stupendous Man on Dec 30, 2011 9:11 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think Portland, OR is on deck.

Not that they’re the best site available (though they are a bigger market than some existing MLB markets), but they seem the most desperate and probably will pony up the most.

by alskor on Dec 30, 2011 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Live in PDX

It’s so difficult to imagine MLB moving here. The Triple-A team left and even when they were here there was so little support. I’m not sure where you can get that anybody’s desperate here for MLB…

by AGuinness on Jan 2, 2012 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Minor League Ball Gameday, 5/25 MILB
Me_at_8_small
Minor League Ball Gameday Discussion, MiLB 5/24
Me_at_8_small
Today in Minor League Baseball Discussion, MiLB 5/23
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/22
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/21

Recent FanPosts

Small
Texas Rangers: Draft War Room
Small
Washington Nationals MOD 3
Xander_small
Red Sox MOD: Draft Room
Small
Padres MOD #4 (Final MOD)
Henrik-lundqvist-crossed-pads_small
MOD: Mets #6 (2012 Review)
Small
Good luck everyone.....
Small
Toronto Blue Jays MOD #6
Timmyace_small
MLB Mock Draft Round 1, 1s, 2, 3
Small
MOD#6 - Rangers (2nd Round - 93rd Pick)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Editors

Small Craig Goldstein

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter