Milwaukee Brewers Top 20 Prospects for 2011
All grades are EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY and subject to change. Don't get too concerned about exact rankings at this point, especially once you get past the Top 10. Grade C+/C guys are pretty interchangeable depending on what you want to emphasize.
Feel free to critique the list, but use logic and reason rather than polemics to do to. The list and grades are a blending of present performance and long-term potential. Full reports on all of players can be found in the2011 Baseball Prospect Book. We are now taking pre-orders. Order early and order often!
QUICK PRIMER ON GRADE MEANINGS:
Grade A prospects are the elite. They have a good chance of becoming stars or superstars. Almost all Grade A prospects develop into major league regulars, if injuries or other problems don't intervene. Note that is a major "if" in some cases.
Grade B prospects have a good chance to enjoy successful careers. Some will develop into stars, some will not. Most end up spending several years in the majors, at the very least in a marginal role.
Grade C prospects are the most common type. These are guys who have something positive going for them, but who may have a question mark or three, or who are just too far away from the majors to get an accurate feel for. A few Grade C guys, especially at the lower levels, do develop into stars. Many end up as role players or bench guys. Some don't make it at all.
A major point to remember is that grades for pitchers do NOT correspond directly to grades for hitters. Many Grade A pitching prospects fail to develop, often due to injuries. Some Grade C pitching prospects turn out much better than expected.
Also note that there is diversity within each category. I'm a tough grader; Grade C+ is actually good praise coming from me, and some C+ prospects turn out very well indeed.
Finally, keep in mind that all grades are shorthand. You have to read the full comment for my full opinion about a player, the letter grade only tells you so much. A Grade C prospect in rookie ball could end up being very impressive, while a Grade C prospect in Triple-A is likely just a future role player.
Milwaukee Brewers Top 20 Prospects for 2011
1) Mark Rogers, RHP, Grade B-: Borderline B. Love the stuff, but command concerns keep me cautious with the grade.
2) Cody Scarpetta, RHP, Grade B-: Borderline B. Personal favorite for a couple of years, like Rogers I worry about his command but like his stuff.
3) Kentrail Davis, OF, Grade B-: Good tools, hits for average, I think he'll get on base. But what about power?
4) Amaury Rivas, RHP, Grade B-: Solid across the board, looks like a fourth starter to me.
5) Kyle Heckathorn, RHP, Grade B-: Huge ground ball specialist, another future fourth starter?
6) Wily Peralta, RHP, Grade B-: Another arm with solid stuff, though I don't like the dropping strikeout rate and deterioration in K/BB in Double-A.
7) Scooter Gennett, 2B, Grade B-: A very good hitter, needs to polish defense but could make a lot of noise in '11. Keep close track of him.
8) Jimmy Nelson, RHP, Grade C+: Starter or reliever? Fits into Brewers profile as a fourth starter type with decent but not exceptional stuff.
9) Caleb Gindl, OF, Grade C+: I think he's better than he looked in Double-A, but still more of a future role player than heavy duty regular.
10) Eric Komatsu, OF, Grade C+: Like Gindl, can be a good role player but unless he turns the power up he will be stretched to start.
11) Tyler Thornburg, RHP, Grade C+: Very good stuff, could move quickly if used in bullpen.
12) Hunter Morris, 1B, Grade C: Plenty of power potential, but something makes me wonder if he'll fully live up to expectations. I might be underrating him.
13) D'Vontrey Richardson, OF, Grade C: Outstanding tools, extremely raw. Can he refine them?
14) Tyler Roberts, C, Grade C: Strong power potential, needs a lot of defensive polish.
15) Eric Farris, 2B, Grade C: Forgotten man after injury season, but he can steal bases and has a good glove.
16) Khris Davis, OF, Grade C: Good power production in the Midwest League, but a bit old for the level. Grade will rise if he hits in Double-A. . .might be able to pull a Jerry Sands.
17) Logan Schafer, OF, Grade C: Should be a good fourth outfielder if he gets healthy.
18) Dan Merklinger, LHP, Grade C: Doesn't have blazing stuff, but good stats, protected on 40-man roster. Maybe a fifth starter.
19) Mike Fiers, RHP, Grade C: Older prospect at 25, fastball is average, but really knows how to pitch.
20) Robert Hinton, RHP, Grade C: Good fastball/slider combo could help in pen this year.
OTHERS OF NOTE: Eric Arnett, RHP; Nick Bucci, RHP; Chris Dennis, 1B-OF; Cutter Dykstra, 3B; Pat Egan, RHP; Taylor Green, 3B; Cody Hawn, 1B; Brandon Kintzler, RHP; Maverick Lasker, RHP; Matt Miller, RHP; Joel Pierce, RHP; Austin Ross, RHP; Jesus Sanchez, RHP; Zelous Wheeler, SS.
Trades tore the guts out of this system and there isn't much left. Rogers, Scarpetta, and Kentrail Davis are all capable of making an impact, but all three have significant questions as well. After that, you have a huge mass of guys who can be contributors but not stars or even regulars, or tools hounds who are very raw. One exception is Scooter Garrett, who I expect will sneak up on people this year.
There isn't much else to say about the Brewers. They are making a play to win this year, and that's a legitimate use of farm talent, provided you are prepared to recharge quickly.
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Missing
John—I thought you had mentioned you were going to include Lawrie, Odorizzi, & Jeffress in this write up.
The one constant through all the years, Ray, has been baseball. It reminds us of all that once was good, and that could be again.
no
he said two posts ago tha they were going to be slotted into their current organizations
time
after we get the editing done, I will go back and revise the Top 20 lists to reflect the changes.
Odorizzi: B+
Jeffress Strong B, may go B+
Lawrie B+
If Casey Kelly is a B, Jeffress should not be a B+
Makeup has to account for something.
Dewey and KBR are just.......too........sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!
The Wolfpac is looking for new soldiers! Change your logo to the black and red!!!
by King Billy Royal on Jan 7, 2011 11:57 AM EST up reply actions
Casey Kelly isn't as far along
all good prospects get higher ratings the closer to the big leagues they are just because they’re easier to evaluate.
Come one now, 10 MLB innings don't mean that much
Do you realize that Kelly actually has more innings in the high minors than Jeffress does?
Exactly
Dewey and KBR are just.......too........sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet!!!!!!
The Wolfpac is looking for new soldiers! Change your logo to the black and red!!!
by King Billy Royal on Jan 8, 2011 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
Just a question but since this is the last entry and you are about to go into editing and then send it off to print
Wouldn’t " All grades are EXTREMELY PRELIMINARY and subject to change." not really be accurate?
Nice work as always… figure I would razz you a bit while I still had a chance
JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook
Ouch.
They better do a good job drafting this year…
Arnett couldn't make the top 20 of this list?
How the mighty have fallen
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
Eric Arnett
My how the mighty have fallen. Can’t even crack the top 20 in this system?
My how the mighty have fallen
Eric Arnett not in the top 20
What joke am I missing?
TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems
by OldProspects on Jan 7, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions
No joke
Simply stated Arnett stunk so bad last season that a skunk would take offense. As someone who drafted him in a Dynasty league I’ve followed him closely. Keeping fingers crossed he can regain the form that scouts fell in love with, but he might be best suited for a back of the bullpen position.
by cyder7830 on Jan 7, 2011 6:08 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he did kinda come out of nowhere his junior year
i played for indiana in the fall of ’07, and he was nowhere near the guy we saw in ’08. made some huge changes fairly quickly WRT mph and command.
"If you hit .440 with 20 bombs, you don't have to do s---. You don't have to bring a glove to practice, just hit and leave whenever you want. You can bring a 40 and smoke a cigarette and call me from the parking lot asking me what time the game is, and I'll tell you. You can even say 'F--- you, Steve!' Actually, don't say that, that wouldn't be very nice." -Steve Friend, Head Coach, Chabot College Gladiators Baseball
scarpetta
Heard he had some mechanical tweak that was responsible for his sharp improvement in command in the second half of the season. Stuff sounds good enough for him to go places if the command is there.
interesting to see how he'll do next season
if he can have better command he could become a #2 starter
by ilikeburritos on Jan 6, 2011 10:36 PM EST up reply actions
Nah
He probably tops out as a #4, #3 in a perfect world sense. He will always be a starter but his stuff just isnt that impressive for the top of a rotation.
The endless line of potential 4th starters
Kyle Heckathorn gets a B- grade and the nod as a back-end starter because of his ground ball rate?
Please contrast him with Blake Beaven, if you would. It would appear Beaven’s biggest knock is his lack of K’s, whereas Heckathorn has the same issue. Heckathorn failed to sniff the level that Beaven began the season at— and won POY— yet is seven months older. Heckathorn romped through a pitcher’s A-ball league while Beaven cruised all the way to AAA.
Your blurb about Beaven was spun in a very negative light, whereas Heckathorn’s was made to sound promising. I am curious.
If you think you hate me now, wait until you get to know me.
beavan
I’m just not impressed with Beavan. Heckathorn throws harder. Beavan looks like an AAAA guy when I’ve seen him.
by John Sickels on Jan 6, 2011 10:30 PM EST up reply actions
Heckathorn...
He allowed a ton of unearned runs. If his unearned vs. earned runs came at the same rate as Beaven’s his era would have been in the low to mid 4’s instead of the high 2’s. That would not have looked pretty for a 22-year-old in the Midwest league.
I understand that statistics don’t tell the whole story. But how much faster is that fastball? Is his command up to Beaven’s level? Beaven is also headed into his age 22 season, and is a very big man who has thrown harder in the past. Does he not have the capacity to improve?
Sorry to talk about Beaven in a Brewer’s post.
If you think you hate me now, wait until you get to know me.
Reports I've read
..have Heckathorn parked in the low 90s, touching the mid 90s with excellent sink. Flashes a 60 slider, shows good command overall. Add to that, he has a better body than Beaven, and lacks the latter poor track record. And though his K rate isn’t great, it was solidly superior to Beavan’s.
Defenders in A ball make more errors than those at higher levels; not sure why that is Heckathorn’s fault.
I appreciate the scouting report
I don’t know much about Heckathorn beyond the stats.
If you think you hate me now, wait until you get to know me.
Two plus pitches and one serviceable
Heck has a plus sinker, and borderline plus slider. His four seamer is a serviceable one. Still think he could be a good closer one day, but with how ultra thin this system is he’s got to remain stretched out.
by cyder7830 on Jan 7, 2011 6:18 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Beaven's velo
Wasn’t it generally high-80s the last year or so? Sounded a tick below Heckathorn’s at least, not that velo is everything.
by blackoutyears on Jan 7, 2011 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
FWIW
I saw Beavan last year. Basically does anything to avoid a walk, pitched backwards to induce contact, approach won’t work in the majors. Doesn’t have very good arm speed, was high 80s-low 90s but no projection beyond that point. Below-average breaking ball, decent changeup that has average potential. Solid downward life on his fastball generates weak contact, better hitters with more strength will beat it. I was blown away when I saw where he ended up in the Baseball America TL Top 20 – he just isn’t that good.
I saw Beavan last year
I remember that, kupe. I’m probably basing my impressions off your report as much as anyone’s now that I think about it. lol
I remember himn getting tabbed with a stab in his delivery. Was that the case in your viewing(s)?
by blackoutyears on Jan 10, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions
Doesn't Heckathorn have a big arm too or am I think of someone esle?
Anyway, looks like a weak system after the trade.. Rogers has a long history of injuries though I have to say that I’m impressed he made it back and looks good doing it,
Excited
I may be more excited about Mark Rogers than I am about anyone in the entire organization. I really saw something at the end of last season. Signs of dominance in his velocity and stuff.
Kentrail Davis
i watched Davis’ season pretty close last season. He came out on fire with Brevard County for the first couple of weeks and then rapidly cooled off. After his demotion he was obviously stellar. I wonder what the reports are for Davis’ defense. And was his resurgence last season post-demotion a product of the weaker pitching, being out of the FSL, or did his bat really get going on his talent…..
The team said they sent him to Wisconsin because the climate would be better for a nagging hamstring injury.
Now that's great tasting chicken!
Wow...
And I thought the White Sox system was bad.
Wow again
Surprised to see that Garfield was not in the top 20. While his numbers have not exactly jumped off the charts, he has been very solid with what he has been given to work with. He is definately ahead of Tyler Roberts and is already full season proven, where as Roberts has not even played a full short season league yet. Remember, Garfield was the only catcher to call a no hitter for the entire system last season. I also notice that he has been picked to start in Brevard next season by a few of the periodicals including MLB depth charts. Where do you have Garfield?
What's your definition of "full season proven?"
If it just means “he’s played full season ball,” then sure, Garfield has done that. But he hit .245/.287/.318, so “he showed up all year” is probably the best you can say about him.
He’s young, but those numbers are a long way away from notability.
Now that's great tasting chicken!
WOW again
How do you have Hinton ahead of Kintzler? Kintzler sat in the mid 90’s in the fall league and struck out a batter per inning, also doesnt walk many guys. And based on his numbers last year he seemed like the top reliever in the system. Just wondering where you came up with it!!
Wow again
Mr. Lobner,obviously you didn’t have an opportunity to see Garfield play, because if you had, you would not be questioning what full season proven means!!!
lvbrew
I never posted anything about Kintzler or Hinton?
Catchers
Mr. Lobner, was just wondering what your background was with catchers? Maybe you know a little bit more than me, because I thought the main things with catchers are the relationships they build with the pitching staff and how they run a game. Hitting always comes second with catchers, because as I said before, if a catcher is a good hitter (9 out of 10 times) he will not stay at the position. It’s just too much wear and tear on players and most guys are not built for it or are unable or unwilling to do the gut check thats required. A catcher now a days cannot be fat or skinny, he needs to be flexible, muscular, quick on feet, and have a coaches head for the game.
John Sickels
Sorry Brewer Manure, i was directing that post towards John Sickels
lvbrew
No worries, you just had me scratching my head.

by 




















