Double-A Transition Monitor: Alex Liddi, Conor Gillaspie
Double-A Transition Monitor
Alex Liddi, 3B, Mariners: Alex Liddi hit .345/.411/.594 in 2009, with 23 homers, 44 doubles, 53 walks, and 122 strikeouts in 493 at-bats. The caveat, of course, was that he did this at High Desert in the California League, where my dachshund dog could hit .300. This made Liddi's Double-A transition in 2010 critical for his future. He passed it just fine, hitting .281/.353/.476 with 37 doubles, 15 homers, 50 walks, and 145 strikeouts in 502 at-bats for West Tennessee. On the negative side, he struck out more often and his walk rate dipped, but overall he held his own. Indeed, if you look closely at it, he actually had a better year this season in some ways.
His OPS was +14 percent compared to the Southern League average, not spectacular but credible for a 21 year-old making his debut at that level. In 2009, his OPS was +32 percent compared to the Cal League. . .however, a lot of that was because of High Desert, where he posted a 1.158 OPS. On the road last year, he posted an .849 OPS, which was +12 percent compared to the Cal League average. If we discard the High Desert numbers due to the conditions there, he actually "produced" just as much this year as last year, at least by that measure.
Liddi is still working on his defense and made 27 errors at third base this year for an inadequate .909 fielding percentage. He also spent some time at first base, although despite the Es his glovework is considered promising at third by many scouts due to his arm strength and hands. I'd leave him there for now and see if his reliability improves as he gains experience.
Overall, while Liddi still needs work with contact and fielding reliability, I like what he did this year enough to raise him from a Grade B- to a Grade b.
Conor Gillaspie, 3B, Giants: Another player making the move from the Cal League to more difficult competition is Giants third sacker Conor Gillaspie. He hit .286/.364/.386 last year for San Jose, regarded as disappointing especially in the power department. His OPS was league-average. Jumped up to Double-A Richmond this year, he hit .287/.335/.420, which doesn't look much better on the surface. His OPS improved a bit to +3 percent. However, Richmond is sort of the opposite of High Desert: it's a tough environment. He hit just .253/.303/.378 at home, but a much more impressive .320/.365/.460 on the road, which as more like what the Giants were looking for when they drafted him out of Wichita State.
He made some progress on defense, lowering his error rate significantly (.908 FP last year, .946 this year), and reportedly improving his range and reactions at least slightly. His range factor improved for what that's worth. Total Zone isn't out yet, but it will be interesting to see if that jives with the other data.
I still don't know if Gillaspie will have enough of a bat to be a regular third baseman, but he made enough progress to go from a Grade C to a C+.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Gillaspie
As a Giants’ fan I am not quite sure what to make of him. Considering that the Giants gave him a major league deal and a large bonus, they will give him every opportunity to succeed/fail.
Last year he had a fantastic BB:KK ratio. 55:68. That was at least something to be optimistic about. There were quotes floated out there that he had a better eye than most of the umpires. No, I am not exaggerating, things like that were really said, lol….Other than that, his year wasn’t very good. I heard eyewitness horror stories about his defense at 3B in San Jose and I think I remember him even DH’ing a decent amount.
This year he got off to a slow start and I think a lot of Giants’ fans wrote him off. Like other guys in Richmond he turned it on when the weather got warm and he finished with decent numbers. He K’ed almost an identical amount as he did in San Jose, but his BB’s dropped. He went from having above average plate discipline to below average. I think it is pretty safe to assume that the Giants’ are trying to get him to be more aggressive and drive the ball as his slugging did increase. His OPS was the same as in San Jose, what he lost in OBP in Richmond he replaced with SLG. I didn’t hear anything about his defense this year.
When he was drafted Bill Mueller comps were suggested. His lack of defense makes that seem pretty unrealistic to me at this point. I would think his upside at this point would be more like Dave Hansen.
by Sgt. Dingleberry on Sep 12, 2010 11:18 AM EDT reply actions
Dave Hansen!
That reference made my day. lol and thx
by blackoutyears on Sep 12, 2010 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
Liddi...
I’m really not a fan, honestly. He doesn’t have a glaring weakness, but he doesn’t have any real strengths either. That is, he’s good enough to be an above average minor leaguer, but I’m not sure any of his skills are strong enough to play at a higher level. I think his upside is 2nd-division starter, and have pretty serious doubts that he’ll ever be able to contribute to a good team in more than a bench role.
You have to figure
Liddi should be behind in development compared to other 21 year olds because where he is from and the amount of baseball he was able to play / level of competition to compete against. I could see his bat being like a Jesse Barfield kind of player, both good athletes with good power but some hole in the swing.
Stats are not a euphemism for tits
I'm well aware of his background.
I’m not looking at his stats as a basis for my opinion. His stats are fine. Not great, but fine. I just don’t see the tools necessary to develop into a major league regular.
Liddi finished the season on a high note going 10 for 19. Can’t wait to see him in Tacoma soon.
Jeff Wise
http://www.baseballhittingtipsonline.com
by Baseball Hitting Tips on Sep 13, 2010 11:07 AM EDT reply actions

by 



















