Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

Strasburg

Here's Lincoln Hamilton of Project Prospect on Stephen Strasburg on Oct. 13, 2009.

"As his hips and shoulders fully open, Strasburg's pitching arm goes through severe reverse forearm bounce (where the ball and the pitching elbow, basically go in opposite directions. In Strasburg's case the ball goes from towards third base to first and his elbow goes from towards first to third). Reverse forearm bounce is a major risk factor for elbow injuries including UCL tears which require Tommy John surgery to fix."

Very interesting. Here's a link if you want to check out the full article:  Here is the full article

Comment 44 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Post #12342438209789

On Strasburg…

Why not include this in any of those threads? This is an article that basically copies exactly what two different reports that I read say about his delivery. Yet another article showed a perfect comp with Steve Carlton’s (I believe) arm motion and Stephen Strasburg’s, and Carlton had very little injury issue at all in a very long MLB career. Pitching is a maximum effort motion with the arm that can easily lead to issues. Predicting a pitcher to get injured is like predicting a pasture full of cows to contain manure.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Aug 29, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Logical fallacy

“[Insert pitcher here] pitched that way and he didn’t get injured!” does not disprove the thesis that X mechanical issue increases the risk of injury.

by OremLK on Aug 29, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

How is that different from...

the corresponding logical fallacy: “pitcher X has Y motion and thus has a high risk of injury”?

Or for that matter, “Pitcher X has Y motion which caused Z injury?”

by slamcactus on Aug 29, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Those statements aren't saying they prove something

They’re setting forth a hypothesis, albeit one that’s tough to test without a huge amount of samples.

The logical fallacy is trying to disprove a theory about the probability of getting injured with one sample.

by nixa37 on Aug 29, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Both are flawed

…as hypothesis. You can disprove either with a number of examples. You teach a certain motion to lessen the damage on the arm, but the truth is that pitching is like banging your head against a wall. You may never get a concussion, but there’s a good probability that it will eventually happen.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

by biggentleben on Aug 29, 2010 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Nah

Strasburg deserves 1800 threads just based on his awesomeness. Can someone please start another one?

by guru4u on Aug 29, 2010 1:44 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

I called on the exact pitch - Joe Mauer's first career Home-Run at Target Field !!!

Why Oh Why did the D'Backs select A.J. Pollock over Mike Trout?

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Aug 29, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's not.

A little peer pressure in these instances is the best way to keep a site in line, rather than waiting around for an “authority”. For instance, right here I’m going to tell you that you should butt out, and let these things work themselves out. Peer pressure.

by PissedMick on Aug 29, 2010 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions   4 recs

What great logic

Someone asks the posters to let the mod and the owner of the site police it but you would rather (1) tell him to shut up and (2) chastise the original author for posting a topic for discussion on a discussion board. Let’s essentially have a penis measuring contest to decide who is right. Is this a junior high football team or what?

I personally think the topic is valid. A lot of people on this site gave Foster, Lincoln and all of PP a bunch of shit for going out on a limb with their assessment of Strasburg. “How could you possibly rank anyone but Strasburg the #1 prospect in baseball?” Nearly every other publication was willing to just award Strasburg a spot in the HoF and they went against the grain…not just to go against the grain, but because they had true reservations that have been somewhat validated. I get it, correlation doesn’t necessarily mean causation but they are trying to expand the group knowledge by taking what others have done a step further. They read up on red flags for pitching mechanics, then deduced which red flags are more severe (in their opinion) and more likely to lead to injury. To take the approach that you can’t figure out which motions lead to a higher injury risk and all pitchers hold the same risk is really lazy.

by jfish26101 on Aug 29, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heck PP doesn't even have Hellickson in their top 100

They think his shoulder is going to pop off, we’ll see…

by Bravesin07 on Aug 29, 2010 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

He's #77

Obviously doesn’t look good currently, but let’s see how his arm holds up.

by nixa37 on Aug 29, 2010 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well...

Let’s see what happens when Hellickson starts getting stretched out for 175+ inning seasons. He’s five years removed from being drafted and still hasn’t topped 152.0 innings in a single regular season.

AdamWFoster on Twitter
Projectprospect.com Founder

by Adam Foster on Aug 30, 2010 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh I agree completely

Hellickson’s ranking doesn’t look good on the surface right now, but he also hasn’t done anything to allay the concern that led you guys to rank him where you did. Its definitely a ranking that will take years to evaluate.

by nixa37 on Aug 30, 2010 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

laughable ranking here from PP

10 Fernando Martinez LF/RF Plus power/good contact skills may allow him to ascend to stardom some day

http://projectprospect.com/article/2010/02/23/2010-top-100-prospect-list

by Bravesin07 on Aug 29, 2010 10:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Why don’t you talk like this on their boards Braves? Should I go look for quotes about Sickels from their boards? :D

Keep hiding in the bushes.

by jfish26101 on Aug 29, 2010 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

My apologies

I probably should have posted this in one of the Strasburg threads already up on the site, but those seemed to be fading, and I thought this was interesting enough to stand on its own. I realize there should have been a better title.
This is my first fanpost, so I guess this is my rookie hazing.
I just wanted to generate some discussion.
Thanks, guys.

by soxaroundtheclock on Aug 29, 2010 11:27 PM EDT reply actions  

don't stress it

it’s an interesting discussion. welcome.

by BryceHarper on Aug 30, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you throw 100 MPH, you're incredibly gifted and also at a much higher risk for getting injured.

It’s a good reason why Rob Dibble only lasted so long. Why Joel Zumaya’s career was over before it really got rolling.

Yes, there are iron men. Men you can cite for being hard throwers that stayed healthy, but few who have pitched as hard as 100 MPH on a consistent basis. And they are the exception, not the rule.

If you drive a street bike down a busy street road at 80 mph every single day, I can predict you will get in a horrific accident eventually because the color of the bike is blue. But it doesn’t make my prediction true. It just means I knew that you were at a higher risk and I picked a cause. That’s it.

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 30, 2010 3:19 PM EDT reply actions  

because he's a freak of nature...

As Humbled Fan says, they are exceptions, not the rule.

And Ryan doesn’t have an entirely clean bill of health. He had elbow surgery in 1975.

by Alex Eisenberg on Aug 31, 2010 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nolan

Actually did have great mechanics, and he was one of the best conditioned athletes of all time…and he also might have been a freak of nature.

by LHamilton on Aug 31, 2010 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think some of the problem might be that Strasburg wasn't all that highly touted until he got to SD State and they transformed him into what he was.

When you start intriguing people early in high school, perhaps they start teaching you the right things earlier on. And I say this knowing almost nothing of high school baseball, just a hypothesis.

by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 31, 2010 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D'Arnaud the 'Next One?'
Firebeall11_small
Blazing Fastball's Top 300 Prospect Rankings
Small
Keith Law top 100 Prospects
Small
Overall Community Prospect #91
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61
Small
Community Positional Prospect #63 RUNOFF
Small
New 30 team League starting, need 12 owners
Small
Dynasty Dilemma
Small
Overall Community Prospect #90

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter