Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Not a Rookie: Gio Gonzalez


Not a Rookie: Gio Gonzalez

One of the more enigmatic young pitchers in the game today is Oakland Athletics lefty Gio Gonzalez.  He entered 2010 as a huge questionmark, but has made significant improvements this year, currently 7-5 with a 3.50 ERA in 17 starts, cutting his ERA by more than two runs compared to last year. Let's take a look at his background and development as a prospect.

Star-divide

Gio Gonzalez was drafted by the Chicago White Sox in the supplemental first round of the 2004 draft, out of high school in Miami, Florida. He was considered a certain first round pick as an amateur, but his stock dropped somewhat after an argument between his mother and his high school coach (over his brother) got Gio dismissed from the team. He was also thought to be rather arrogant and with an off-putting personality. The White Sox liked his 88-90 MPH fastball along with his big-breaking curve, and he got off to a good start with a 2.25 ERA and a 36/8 K/BB in 24 innings in the Appalachian League. They jumped him up to Kannapolis in the Sally League in August, a huge jump for a high school kid, but he more than held his own with a 3.03 ERA and a 27/13 K/BB in 32 innings. Highly impressed with this, I gave him a Grade B+ in the 2005 book and ranked him as the Number 31 pitching prospect in the game.

Gonzalez began 2005 with Kannapolis again, posting a 1.87 ERA with an 84/22 K/BB in 58 innings, an outstanding strikeout rate. Promoted to High-A Winston-Salem, he remained effective with a 3.56 ERA and a 79/25 K/BB in 73 innings. His velocity went up a notch to 90-93 MPH, and he made further strides with his curveball and changeup. His combined numbers were 13-6, 2.82 with a 163/47 K/BB in 131 innings, with only 97 hits allowed. I gave him another Grade B+, ranked Number 34. He was traded to the Phillies in the Jim Thome trade; at this point, the main concern was that his scrawny body might not hold up under a large workload.

The Phillies sent Gonzalez to Double-A Reading for 2006. He struggled at times, going 7-12, 4.66 with a 166/81 K/BB in 155 innings, 140 hits. The K/IP and H/IP were strong, but his control was poor and too many walks resulted in an inflated ERA. His velocity was up into the 92-95 range, but mechanical inconsistencies hampered his control, and he losts his composure on the mound at times. The Phillies traded him back to the White Sox for Freddy Garcia at the end of the year. I was concerned enough about the command problems, his workload, problems dealing with stress, and the transaction pingpong to lower his rating a notch to Grade B, and had him at Number 39 on my list.

The Sox sent him back to Double-A, with solid results: 3.18 ERA, 185/57 K/BB in 150 innings, 116 hits. Again, the K/IP and H/IP were excellent, and he reduced his walk rate and home run rates substantially. His velocity, interestingly enough, was actually down to 88-93 MPH. But his secondary pitches and command were sharper, and his mechanics were more consistent. I moved him back up to Grade B+ and ranked at Number 11 on the prospect list.

On January 3rd, 2008, Gonzalez was traded again, this time to the Oakland Athletics. Gonzalez split 2008 and 2009 between Triple-A and the majors, pitching well in the minors, but getting hammered in his major league time.  His stats for Oakland:

2008: 7.68 ERA, 7.04 FIP, 5.17 xFIP, 9.0 K/9, 6.6 BB/9, 8.5 H/9
2009: 5.75 ERA, 4.47 FIP, 4.02 xFIP, 9.9 K/9, 5.1 BB/9, 10.3 H/9
2010: 3.50 ERA, 3.95 FIP, 4.39 xFIP, 7.3 K/B, 4.2 BB/9, 7.6 H/9

As you can see, his FIP and xFIPs were always better than his ERA;s indeed, if you trust xFIP he's actually slightly worse this year than last. His strikeout rate is down. On the other hand, his walk rate is down also, and continued progress in that direction will help him maintain his current performance. His velocity has actually been a bit better this year than in previous seasons, averaging 92.1 MPH compared to 91.6 in '09 and 89.7 in '08.

I interviewed Oakland GM Billy Beane back in November and he had this to say about Gio:


"Gio is a really interesting guy. Even when he's getting hit hard, he still strikes guys out. Ultimately we think it will play out in his favor. Gio is a very high-strung guy, high-energy, and sometimes that works against him. It will take him a little longer to get comfortable, but we understand that. Brett Anderson is the opposite, he's very calm and under control emotionally, but Gio is still learning to harness his emotions. We think he made a lot of progress doing that.
    If you look at his game-by-game lines, you can see signs that he's pulling things together. Back in July, he had a really bad game against the
Twins (ed.--10 hits and 11 runs allowed in 2.2 innings on July 20th), but he came back from that to pitch well against the Yankees (July 25th, one run in 6.2 innings) and Red Sox (July 30th, eight strikeouts in 5.1 innings) on the road. That's not easy in those environments, so he showed he could bounce back. We were also really happy with his last start, where he fanned 10 and didn't walk anyone (October 2nd against the Angels) in six innings. That shows the kind of potential he has. He just needs more time to put it together consistently, learn to channel his emotions when he gets amped up."


Gonzalez still has some adjustments to make; he's leading the American League in walks, and the component ratios show that he hasn't improved as much as the raw ERA indicates. Still, he's quite clearly made progress over the last two seasons, and at age 24 he still has lots of time on the clock.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

seems he's been around forever

but being only 24 means he could be scratching the surface of what he could be able to do, the stuff has always been there, if he ever gets to control his pitches and command the zone, he’ll be an ace

by Cesar V on Jul 6, 2010 11:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Long run...

I think he’s a pretty good 3 at worst if he remains healthy. He’s got the upside to be a good 2 with some 1 type seasons.

by SenorGato on Jul 6, 2010 11:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Easily my favorite pitcher to watch pitch.

Curveball is awesome, and ya never know what you’re going to see when he’s on the hill. I love seeing him harness control, and we’re really starting to see what he can do. Hopefully he keeps with the trend of improving every season, and eventually he’ll live up to his full potential.

Keep in mind, of course, that "the best defense of Derek Jeter's life" ranks somewhere in between "the best fiscal responsibility of Mike Tyson's life" and "the best not-getting-assassinated-ness of James Garfield's life." -FJM

by travdog6 on Jul 7, 2010 4:12 AM EDT reply actions  

+1 on curve

One of the more impressive curves I’ve seen in a while. When people talk about a curve needing to have shape, pull up some video of this guy.

by mrkupe on Jul 7, 2010 9:01 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Thanks for the write-up

Is there any reason he never got higher than a B+ from you, John? Seems like after 2005 and 2007 he would have been a good candidate for a higher grade.

by cookiedabookie on Jul 7, 2010 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

B+

Keep in mind that B+ is a high grade from me….I’m a tough grader.

I was worried enough about his workload, small frame, and the personality issues to keep him out of the A- range.

by John Sickels on Jul 7, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know control can be a fleeting thing for all pitchers, but especially those who never really learn to harness it

But at this point, Oliver Perez is looking more like Gio’s floor than his expected outcome. That’s a very, very good thing.

www.zekeishungry.com

by thejd44 on Jul 7, 2010 11:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Talented, but still a maddening pitcher to watch

Lazy comparison, but still reminds me of jonathan sanchez and oliver perez. Hecan dominate, but obviously has control issues. If anderson and cahill are good as we think, gio can compliment them as a solid #3. But the stretches of bad control and emotional issues are big hurdles from being an ace. I still am annoyed by his buddy ryan sweeney’s plate approach. The coaches need to teach him to pull the damn ball. Sweeney is 6’4", ive seen more in game power out of cliff pennington than him.

by MagicMike23 on Jul 7, 2010 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd like to see more power from Sweeney too, but...

That was kind of an awkward transition to something completely unrelated.

by ozzman99 on Jul 7, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Community Pitching Prospect #62
Small
Community Positional Prospect #65
Small
Overall Community Prospect #93
Small
New Cubs Draft Strategy/Player Development
Small
Stride Length, release point, and Drag
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #64
Small
5 yrold Dynasty Fantasy League team openings
Ryan_pic_small
Super Sickels Keeper League has one more opening
Small
Overall Community Prospect #92

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter