Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Trade Rumor Thread part two

Ok, since the last thread seemed to be pretty popular I'm starting a new one.  10 days till the trade deadline, lets see what people are thinking/hearing

 

I figured it would be a good time to throw up a central gathering point for those rumors, or just an open discussion of the proposals.

 

Ideally this gets rec'd so we can follow the rumors/deals in one place rather then have 100 threads for different players.

Star-divide

Here are some players I expect to get moved (or be shopped) before the deadline: (also known as minimum word filler)

Ty Wiggington

Jeremy Guthrie

Roy Oswalt

David DeJesus

Scott Downs

Jayson Werth

Dan Haren

Corey Hart

Prince Fielder

Carlos Zambrano (if he has any demand)

Derrek Lee

Christian Guzman

John Buck

Chad Qualls

Jason Frasor

Comment 227 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You could also add Jose Bautista to the list. Supposedly the Giants are interested in Bautista.

"Dodger fans aren’t happy when foul balls get into their section, because it interferes with their playing with the beachball"- Mike Krukow

by 49er16 on Jul 21, 2010 7:54 PM EDT reply actions  

im hearing this but i cant find any links

by FenixL on Jul 21, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

i didnt look hard enough lol

by FenixL on Jul 21, 2010 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jon Heyman only tweeted about it today. No links yet.

"Dodger fans aren’t happy when foul balls get into their section, because it interferes with their playing with the beachball"- Mike Krukow

by 49er16 on Jul 22, 2010 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Here you go

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 22, 2010 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Guy's playing so far over his head

That it would be a very wise time to do it, if someone can pay present value instead of expected value.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 22, 2010 12:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not a fan of going after him either

that said, if Heyman is right and all we’d need to give up is Emmanuel Burriss-well then I make that deal in a second

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 22, 2010 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going to laugh when he turns back into Jose Bautista after Anthopoulos trades him

I don’t think there’s a GM that has impressed me more this year than him.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure I agree. Over his head? Maybe…fluke? Hell no. We’re also getting to a point where this is sustained production all the way from the last month of LAST YEAR’s season. He’s always had a pretty good eye at the plate; they’ve tweaked his swing and his bat speed through the ball is now ridiculous. Alex Gonzalez’s 17 homeruns w/ the Jays was a fluke; Bautista’s homeruns are legitimate.

by metafour on Jul 22, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here's a guy with a pretty extended history

The annals are littered with guys who had one big season, and a lot of those guys really only had a big half season. See, e.g. Ben Zobrist, Brady Anderson, Bret Boone, Luis Gonzalez, etc. Maybe he’s a little better now than he was before, but not that much better.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 23, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fausto Carmona

Pirates are rumored to like him.

by Woo! on Jul 21, 2010 8:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Carmona

I heard teams have discussed him but the Indians are not interested in moving him.

by Pup Dog on Jul 21, 2010 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why do people like Carmona still?

I know he had that great season in 2007 and he induces a ton of grounders… but still.

His contact rate and whiff percentage are at career-worst levels, and his 64/49 K/BB ratio is pretty ugly in 123 innings.

Plus, he’s owed $6.1M for 2011, so it’s not like he’s super cheap.

He’s a useful pitcher, but he doesn’t really seem to be a great guy to chase at the trade deadline.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 22, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

http://bullpenbanter.com

by gatling on Jul 22, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

-1

He’s an extreme grounball pitcher. Your silly peripheral rules do not apply. He’d be wanted because he has tossed 123 IP and allowed a .338 Slugging Percentage and a .325 On Base Percentage

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

the peripherals are pretty telling as to why he's been relatively successful this year

BABIP against is way down (.272), infield fly percentage is way up (12%) and HR/FB percentage is way down (6%). The regression will come sooner or later.

A good slg and OBP against doesn’t really mean much if they’re built upon fluky performance that will not be sustainable.

by jibs on Jul 22, 2010 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but he's not "extreme enough"

A 57% GB rate is good, but not crazy good like the 67% mark that Tim Hudson’s put up in 2010.

A 1.31 K/BB is going to be an issue no matter how you slice it. Particularly given the numbers that jibs listed above.

His BABIP is 26 points above his career mark, his infield fly percentage is 5.2% above his career mark, and his HR/FB is 4.2% below his career mark.

Just look at his ERA, FIP and xFIP, because they tell a remarkably similar story for his career.

career ERA: 4.49
career FIP: 4.50
career xFIP: 4.51

Sounds to me like this guy’s true talent is somewhere around a 4.50 ERA, and that’s just not that good. It’s useful, but you shouldn’t have to give up a bunch of talent and then pay $6M a year for it.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Okay

You have to remember, though, that these stats give an accurate picture of what his performance was. We’re still talking about a 26 year old pitcher, who has had at least one full year with an xFIP of 3.88, which also happens to have been his last full year without getting injured. I’m not saying that he should be valued as an ace, but he’s more valuable than your typical 4.50 ERA pitcher

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jul 23, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but he's not close to being the pitcher that he once was in 2007

2007: 81.7% contact rate, 8.6% whiff rate, 57.7% first-strike rate, 5.73 K/9, 2.55 BB/9, 64% GB rate, 3.88 xFIP

2010: 85.2% contact rate, 6.4% whiff rate, 55.7% first-strike rate, 4.67 K/9, 3.58 BB/9, 57% GB rate, 4.64 xFIP

It’s just not even close.

He’s missing less bats, giving up more contact, getting behind in the count more often, striking out less batters, walking more batters and inducing less grounders.

He’s not even remotely close to being the pitcher that he was in 2007, and I think that his ZiPS forecasted 4.43 FIP for the rest of the season is a pretty fair reflection of his true talent.

He’s a solid back-of-the-rotation pitcher that can eat some innings and he has a little upside, but I have a tough time believing that he’ll ever be the pitcher that he in 2007 again. And it’s not like he’ll be that cheap when he’s owed nearly $8M through 2011 and presumably Cleveland will want some quality talent in return as well.

As I said, he’s a guy worth having around, but I’m not giving up some good prospects in order to pay him $6M.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sure

I don’t think we’re disagreeing; he’s not as valuable as a 3.88 xFIP pitcher, but he’s not quite a 4.50 pitcher either. He’s somewhere in between

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jul 23, 2010 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

*your usual 4.50 pitcher either

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jul 23, 2010 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

FIP is always going to underrate guys who pitch to weak contact

If the ability to miss bats is considered a repeatable skill, then the ability to half-miss bats also has to be one.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 23, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

But it also does mean they'll be more prone to good and bad luck than other guys

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 23, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but it's not like his FIP is out of line with his ERA and xFIP

As a 26-year-old with nearly 700 innings of 4.50 FIP/ERA/xFIP, I have a tough time believing that he’s much better than that.

A big part of the reason that his FIP is at 4.50 is because of his above-average HR/9, and the primary reason for that is the strong GB rate that you’re presumably referencing.

He absolutely gets credit for his strong batted ball profile, in the form of a low HR/9.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Padres could use him.

Their pitching is very overrated and he might be the 2nd or 3rd best starter on that team right now. At least bounce Correia from the rotation. The only issue is the 6.1 million but maybe if the Indians kick in some cash, the Padres will send over a better prospect.

by Kenneth Arthur on Jul 22, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would argue that San Diego is a bad spot for Carmona

His best skill is the ability to keep the ball in the park, but that’s somewhat mitigated by pitching in a pitcher’s haven like Petco.

I’d like to see what he could do in Philly or Cincinnati.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 22, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ruben Amaro says...

…would Singleton, Cosart and Gose get it done?

by PhillyFriar on Jul 22, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please....

please, please, please make that offer to the Indians, haha

"God, I'm from Cleveland. When is it going to be our time?"

by BStal11 on Jul 23, 2010 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Eat all the salary

Kinda like how he got that guitarist guy, ya know., hah

"Swingles is Day to Day: IE: He’s being turned into a zombie, but they don’t want the world to know for another 5 days (retroactive)" ~Zonis

by Blicks on Jul 23, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

HE WON 19 GAMES ONCE!!!!!!!!!

STAR SP

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 22, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Damn

…you are an idiot sometimes :)

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOLZ

19 GAMZ IS 19 GAMZ BOIIZZ

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 22, 2010 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

thanks ants

thants :)

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 22, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

only the fact that he's a quality start machine...

any team in contention would love a guy who keeps his team in it until the later innings. People overreact to his low strikeout #‘s. The fact is, he’s a solid pitcher who knows how to get big league hitters out.

by smk1363 on Jul 23, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Paul Maholm

Dodgers are rumored to be asking around about him. Pirates fans are all about Dee Gordon and James McDonald judging from various websites.

by Woo! on Jul 21, 2010 8:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Paul Maholm...

with the Pirates kicking in some salary. Dee Gordon is a possibilty considering that the dodgers traded Carlos Santana for Casey Blake. Seems like a similar trade might happen.

ETHAN MARTIN!!!!

by joegonzo on Jul 21, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be shocked if they got that much for Maholm

He’s solid, but damn that would be overpaying by the Dodgers.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 21, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why not?

Gordon is risky.

Steve Z

by steve_z on Jul 21, 2010 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Pirates make this move

if they can absolutley fleece the Dodgers. I know Dodgers fans won’t want to hear this but I think its a possibility. Something like Maholm + Dotel + Cash for Gordon + Withrow/Martin + thrown is in something a cash strapped organization lacking the best trading track record may due out of desperation.

Hopefully that throw in is Sands =p

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why would they do that?

If they’re willing to give up that kind of package, they could land Haren. Maholm is a solid pitcher, but he’s not going to land that kind of prospect.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.....

I just hope Maholm continues his recent improvement, because people seem to think that he is closer to 2008 form than 2009 form. I think it is more likely the latter, especially with age.

by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 22, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well you could argue

Maholm has been better this year (slight margin, although Haren has been much better based on actually important stats, K/9, FIP etc.) so he may have a slight bit more perceived value or at least isn’t that far behind. His contract is much better (see Dodgers financial struggles + Blake/Santana trade) plus they are throwing in Dotel.

Still, I see your point, and stepping down a notch the Pirates may have to “settle” for something like Gordon + Gould + Sands (or maybe not sands? tough to get a read on his value imo)

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thoughts on that deal?

Maholm + Dotel + cash = Gordon + Gould + Sands?

What do you thinks realisitc if you throw in Meek or Hanrahan instead of Dotel?

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

as a Giants fan

I sure hope the Dodgers do that

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 22, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

To add to Gordon, Gould, and Sands? Idk, i think if you added Miller and Martin you’d have to at least add Withrow and Webster to get the Pirates to take that offer.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 22, 2010 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's ridiculous

There’s no chance there will ever be a deal where the Dodgers trade Gordon, Gould, Sands, Miller, Martin, Withrow and Webster for Maholm, Dotel and cash.

If you add Kemp, maybe.

Maybe.

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jul 22, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Ethier?

or does he make too much money for the PIrates?

by npurcell on Jul 23, 2010 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know what I was thinking

I was just trying to fleece the Pirates, and I apologize for doing so.

Just to be safe I’d add Billingsley.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 23, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that guy was being sarcastic

Because Gordon/Gould/Sands is obviously more than enough to land Maholm and Dotel.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Now I'm confused.

Do people really think that the Pirates can get Dee Gordon in a package for Paul Maholm?

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

unfortunately, some Pirates fans do

based off of the “They gave up Carlos Santana for Casey Blake” and “Paul Maholm is a lot better than people credit him for” arguments

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 23, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

How are those arguments related though?

So basically, because Maholm is underrated and the Dodgers have overpaid in terms of prospects for non-star players in the past… LA is going to give up their best prospect for Maholm?

What kind of reason is that?

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

They're not

The trend I’ve noticed is that most Pirate fans extremely overrate everyone in the system.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 23, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

don't ask me

that’s just what I’ve been seeing. Pirates fans (like most fans of teams), are just wayyy overrating players in their own system.

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 23, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not only that

Maholm actually ISN’T underrated and is actually terribly average. It boggles my mind that people think top prospects would be traded for him.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 23, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

At Satchel question (and then the last paragraph is a more general discourse)
Now I’m confused.

Do people really think that the Pirates can get Dee Gordon in a package for Paul Maholm?

No. First Gordon is more than worth Maholm straight up. If you throw in cash with Maholm TO THE DODGERS it gets closer, but its still borderline. Throw in Dotel and the Dodgers may throw give Gordon plus a decent prospect back (Gould/Sands). If anyone actually read what I wrote I asked about Sands, what his value is/was, etc, but instead people just gave back sarcastic and attacking remarks.

Given the Dodgers history and situation, I want someone to explain to me via a thought out, logical argument why the Pirates FO shouldn’t 1) offer Maholm, Dotel (both who the Dodgers have inquired on) and Cash for Gordon, Gould and Sands (not really expecting a positive answer) but then NOT settle for less than Gordon + Gould/Sands and a throw in.

That’s a #3 prospect (if you use Sickels) in a deep, but not top loaded system. That #3 is a SS who’s value is tied in his tools, is a solid risk, isn’t particularly young for his level, and isn’t super hot. It’s also a #8 prospect who is a pitcher in the low minors (far from a sure thing) and who is also solidly behind the Dodgers depth in prospects (Martin/Withrow). Yes he has the draft pedigree which knocks his value up a little. Last is Sands a guy I admitted I knew little to nothing about. He’s crushing the ball and is obviously on some helium (HM in Sickles rankings) but he’s playing 1B so he needs to be crushing the ball to have any value (again, I know nothing about his actual defensive value).

I’ve just started reading this blog alot this summer and I’ve learned alot and appreciate the knowledge here. Apparently though, knowledge comes with arrogance and a propensity to be a douchebag. You can take that as you want and determine who specifically I’m talking about, but I don’t appreciate it. I’m trying to learn and calling me stupid has no positive effect.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 24, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm still a bit unsure on the inclusion of Octavio Dotel

He’s a pretty bad reliever, and even if the Pirates cover his entire cost, I have no idea how his inclusion makes up for the difference between Gordon-Maholm plus the inclusion of a top-150 guy who’s carrying a lot of helium like Jerry Sands

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 24, 2010 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Even if you pay for part of Maholm’s contract and include Dotel, who isn’t really worth much, I see absolutely no reason to think that LA would give up Gordon for that.

He’s a top-level shortstop prospect with huge upside that’s already in Double-A. Those are really, really rare. You don’t give one of those up to get a relatively cheap No. 3 starter and an okay set-up man.

Giving up Gordon would mean getting an star-level player in return, and Maholm simply isn’t one of those.

I mean, Dan Haren just got traded for freaking Joe Saunders, Pat Corbin, Rafael Rodriguez and Tyler Skaggs. Do you really think that Maholm can land the Pirates Gordon? I sure don’t.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 26, 2010 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maholm is having one of his worst seasons

His walk rate is up, his ground balls are down slightly and his Ks are down. Haren is having a much better statistical season despite the ERA difference. I’m sure the Dodgers do want Maholm because of how much cheaper he is than Haren, but I doubt that they give up their premium guys in order to do it.

With the reliever thrown in, the Pirates could probably land something like Ethan Martin + Andrew Lambo. I’d also see if I could grab Scott Elbert cheaply since he’s gone AWOL. The Pirates can promise him an MLB rotation spot.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh

I hope we don’t touch Lambo. I think y’all are discounting the Dodgers irrational stupidity. At least that’s what I’m counting on.

Do you just think Gordon is untouchable?

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

For Paul Maholm he is

I’m not very high on Lambo, but he has some upside and would be a decent throw in.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't see

Maholm getting moved for less than Gordon. NH has come out and said he needs to be blown away or get young, cheap ML ready talent.

Ely + Gould + Sands for Dotel + Maholm + Cash maybe if that’s what we are looking for. Might have to step down from Gould a bit, but I’m not sure who to.

Our ML + MIL OF depth is such that we will probably only take elite sure things (someone like Jennings or Dom Brown) so I don’t see us taking Lambo. I see us going after Sands > Lambo.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

I could see something like that

Gould would be the prize of that package. I wouldn’t call any of those sure things though. Sands has become interesting, but he’s still an all bat prospect that will have to hit to be any good.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was talking

about if we took an OF. I know its dumb to worry about position over talent most of the time, but the OF is the only spot where the Pirates aren’t lacking now into the future

ML - Cutch, Tabata, Jones, Milledge

Minor Leagues - Presley, Marte, Grossman

When you have three guys like Presley, Marte, and Grossman and two guys pretty well locked into your OF for the next 5 years (Cutch, Tabata) you don’t take anymore Presleys, Martes or Grossman, which is what Lambo is.

That aside, I’d take that package, although I’d rather give up Ely + Sands for Gordon + semi-prospect X.

Gordon + Gould + C- prospect.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Much rather have...

Ethan Martin than Gould. If you guys are taking Gordon out, I think the most likely package is Martin+Elbert for Maholm.

ETHAN MARTIN!!!!

by joegonzo on Jul 22, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

is Elbert

back yet? I have not checked in awhile…

by St.Steve on Jul 22, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you guys CRAZY?

Just wondering. I wouldn;’t give up a red cent or, any prospect for a Paul maholm.

A Pirate would wet himself pitching a game that counts for something – lol

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is MUCH more likely

Though Ethan Martin would still be an overpay for Maholm. Lambo seems to have lost all his value…ugh.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 22, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps

But picking up the check generally gets a better return. Martin is clearly behind Withrow and Miller at this point so I could see the Dodgers dealing him.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with that notion

But still too much for someone as average as Maholm.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 22, 2010 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Martin

is too much for Maholm + Dotel +Cash?

By himself?

Are you crazy? If that’s all they’d offer I’d laugh and walk away, then laugh again before I’d get very far.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uhh

No one said Martin for Maholm + Dotel + cash. You said some ridiculous trade of Sands, Gould, and Gordon for those players and cash, but that was just insane.

I really don’t know where you came up with me saying Martin for Maholm + Dotel + cash.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 23, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

because

thats what this entire conversation has been about. The Pirates won’t move just Maholm to LA, its going to be a package of Maholm, Dotel, and cash, and we’re going to expect something in return.

Gordon + Sands + Gould is a pipedream. Gordon + Sands/Gould + trash isn’t. The Pirates won’t make the trade if they don’t get an semi-elite player back. Let’s not get carried away with how good Gordon is. He’s a semi-young (for his level) SS with tools and a mediocre year. This isn’t Montero or Smoak.

Rumor is the Pirates have asked for Ely and Gordon back. That’s probably too much, but Ely > Sands/Gould and since the above trade was at least considered a legitimate asking price and not a Hanrahan for Feliz (which people are blowing way out of proportion) request that was used to make a point (Read : Hanrahan isn’t cheap and thus not being shopped), it’s not crazy to ask for Gordon and another solid prospect.

Maholm + Cash is borderline acceptable for Gordon (again, a toolsy shortstop who is far from a sure thing) and you throw in Dotel and you get more.

I will agree with you that just Maholm for Gordon is crazy.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 24, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is a truly AWFUL trade. It makes my brain hurt to see offers that are this terrible. WPoeug;alkkwdgpoaiugsajdg;l

The Dodgers don’t need anymore terrible trades, please don’t give Ned ideas :(

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 22, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Id do the plus a million thing except I.m only one guy. Shoot, james McDonald might be as good as Paul Mahol Irf you just stuck him in the rotation for a while – or Charlie Haeger

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree on James

Not Charlie, because Charlie is much below average, but James could be about as good.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 22, 2010 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maholm is being underrated

He has a career xFIP of 4.32. He’s not a great pitcher, but he is a solid #3 inning eater who is signed cheaply next year.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sure

I’d like him better next year but, I wouldn’t pay any kind of price for him to impact my team’s pennant race – unless we were just terrible at 4-5 starter spot. Id much rather have a guy like Ted Lilly down the stretch.
maholm has never pitched an important game.

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well in that case

trade for Jamie Moyer. He’s 47 and oozes with experience. Obviously that makes him vastly more valuable.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 23, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

That’s not a solid 3 pitcher. The Dodgers rotation is good, but after Kuroda they have Padilla who isn’t great and Ely or Mcdonald. If Maholm came to the Dodgers he would literally be the 5th starter. I feel MUCH more confident going with Padilla in the 4 spot than I would with Maholm. Next year Maholm could be the #3 starter for the Dodgers, but I would be sad because it would mean the Dodgers would have one of the worst #3 starters in baseball.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 23, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes he is

What would you consider Joe Blanton? He has a career xFIP of 4.42.

How about Ted Lilliy? 4.35
Matt Garza? 4.44
Aaron Cook? 4.42
Mark Buehrle? 4.23

And it goes on like that. The offer was ridiculous, but so is your opinion of Paul Maholm.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 23, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Blanton is also extremely average

All of those pitchers are very average.

I don’t really subscribe much into xFIP anyway, I’d rather go off FIP, K/9, BB/9, H/9, K/BB, etc…

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 24, 2010 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Depends on the sample size

xFIP is the exact same thing as FIP but with a normalized, league-average HR/FB ratio.

For smaller sample sizes, such as a season or less, it makes far more sense to use xFIP rather than FIP. The latter is subject to huge fluctuations in luck on HR/FB that the former simply doesn’t have to deal with.

If we’re talking about multiple seasons, I can see the argument for FIP, because HR/FB does actually contain some skill; it’s just that it takes far more than one season’s worth of data to determine where that skill approximately lies.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 24, 2010 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m just not big into the idea that all pitchers should get a normalized homerun rate. It’s fairly obvious that not all pitchers all the same amount of homeruns and such. It’s why I’d rather just go with FIP over xFIP most times.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 25, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's perfectly fine to use FIP in large sample sizes, but when you're talking about only 100-200 innings, there can be a good deal of luck influencing a pitcher's HR/FB

xFIP does take into account the number of fly balls that a pitcher gives up. It’s obviously not perfect given that it regresses all HR/FB’s to a single, league-average figure, but I would argue that in small sample sizes that’s going to be more accurate than going with normal HR/FB and FIP as a function of that.

FIP and xFIP both absolutely have their uses, because over time the skill in HR/FB is fleshed out and FIP becomes a more accurate depiction of a pitcher’s ability. But I absolutely prefer to go with a regressed HR/FB in small sample sizes.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 26, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maholm's career FIP is 4.29

Yes, they are average, but they throw a lot of innings and are consistently average. That is a #3 starter.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 24, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maholm (and Blanton) would be the number 5 starter on the Dodgers. This leads me to believe that there is absolutely no reason to trade for them when the Dodgers could just use Ely, Mcdonald, or Monasterious in the 5th spot and not have to give up anything, though there would be slightly less production.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 25, 2010 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why because one dumb trade happened

would another dumb trade happen? People learn from their mistakes.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 22, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Number 4 pitcher at best?

Maholm is a #3 innings eater at worst and a #2 in a good season. Plus if you add cash and a reliever (Dotel/Meek/Hanrahan) Gordon + more is easily obtainable, especially if its one of the two younger, cheaply controlled relievers (who have frankly been much better).

I hope you’re brain is ready to explode because with your fiasco of a GM coupled with financial pressure Gordon goes from a small possibility to a pseudo-lock with a chance for much more. Santana/Blake all over again buddy.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

um
Santana/Blake all over again buddy.

I don’t see any players in these made up deals similar to that trade

by npurcell on Jul 23, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, #4 pitcher AT BEST

He has a career 4.29 ERA, 4.32 FIP, and 4.33 xFIP (those may be switched around but they are all correct)…THAT IS AVERAGE.

The Dodgers have 4 SP better than Maholm, possibly 5 if Mcdonald actually gets a shot.

This is bolded so it gets through to you.

I like how you’re ready to crap talk here when your team has literally been the joke of the league for 2 decades, that’s a smart tactic.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 23, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Talk

crap. When have I talked to crap? You came on here and started insulting my intelligence when I asked a question. I didn’t make a statement. I asked a question. Instead of a helpful answer, I received a personal attack.

The Dodgers have 4 SP better than Maholm, possibly 5 if Mcdonald actually gets a shot.

This is bolded so it gets through to you.

I like how you’re ready to crap talk here when your team has literally been the joke of the league for 2 decades, that’s a smart tactic.

Again, you insult me. Explain to me why I should bother listening to anything you say since it comes with a dagger.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 24, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay

I’ve thought about this briefly and I’m not helping anything soooo..

I’m sorry. We’ve gotten off on the wrong foot (Ivdown and others), and it’s my fault. I’m not here to argue with malice or make enemies. I’d much rather have constructive discussion and learn about baseball. So if we let bygones be bygones I’d much appreciate it.

I will say this in my defense though. While I did (somewhat) open myself up to deserved attacks because I’m a Pirates fan and because I’m not an encyclopedia of baseball knowledge doesn’t make my opinion wrong or worth less and doesn’t mean I can be insulted.

Again, I’m sorry and this will be my last post on this thread.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 24, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure I've come off as an asshole, and I'm sorry about that

But if there’s one thing that gets me riled up it’s talking trades, prospects, and defending players on my team :) I don’t mean any disrespect, I just really get into these types of talks, and I take proposals I believe to be bad too personally for whatever reason, haha.

I see where you are coming from, you want as much as you can get for one of your best starters. I’d feel the same if I was in your shoes. You do make some good points, I just think you might be expecting a little too much for your players. I wouldn’t mind getting Maholm, Dotel, and cash, but here is what I’d propose for that:

John Ely
Nathan Eovaldi
Scott Van Slyke

Not the best of prospects, but Eovaldi can hit close to 100 out of relief, but still does pretty well as a starter (needs to develop secondary pitches, though), and he made the HiA all-star team this year (if that means anything…which Idk if it really does, haha).

Ely showed for a couple months that he has the ability to pitch well in the MLB, but then just hit a rough patch, or may have just been figured out, it’s hard to tell so far. He’s back in the minors working out his problems right now though. Check out his minor league stats pre 2010, he’s been damn good.

As for Scott Van Slyke, he had his best year last year in the Cal League, and struggled in AA this year, so he was sent back down to HiA. He seems to be a fringe type of prospect, but he might be a throw in prospect with Ely and Eovaldi for this trade.

"Stop exploding you cowards!!!"

by Ivdown on Jul 25, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haven't read anything

other than local beat hack speculation, but I personally feel that Corey Hart ends up with ATL…for what exactly I can not say, but something like a Delgado and other low-level pitching pieces sound like it could be worked out from both ends.

by St.Steve on Jul 21, 2010 8:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly what I was thinking

If they wanted Bumgarner and Sanchez, then I don’t see them settling for Delgado and low-level pitching pieces

by Rduffiedc on Jul 21, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

it was

Bum or Sanchez….Maybe Minor and some other pieces, either way the Braves have the young starting pitching talent the crew need.

by St.Steve on Jul 21, 2010 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry

I meant OR, not and… just meant that it was major league ready pitching… and Delgado and low-level prospects aren’t major league ready…

by Rduffiedc on Jul 21, 2010 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Either way, worth more than normal Hart

You have to believe he’ll keep it up for the rest of the year and next year to think that price is even close to worth it.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 22, 2010 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I could see it...

Hart would be a decent fit in Atlanta and most likely guarantee them first place. Delgado or Vizcaino and another B level prospect could get it done. Maybe Delgado and Minor. Tough to trade both but it could be worth it.

ETHAN MARTIN!!!!

by joegonzo on Jul 21, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

couldn't see that

it’s too much

R.I.P. cwhitman412, Frederick0220, & Mets2k9

by doublestix on Jul 21, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It goes along with what...

they are asking. Both Minor and Delgado are around high level B prospects. Hart is worth about that much.

ETHAN MARTIN!!!!

by joegonzo on Jul 22, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

As a Giants fan

I hope Atl gets Hart

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 22, 2010 1:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

As a Braves fan

I hope SanFran gets Hart

"Check out this bitchin' homemade tesla coil!"

by bwellnjonesco on Jul 22, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

As a Brewer fan

I would give Hart away if someone would take Randy Wolf too.

"I agree but dont agree"

by juggernaut400 on Jul 22, 2010 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ouch!

That made me laugh though. I feel ya. Why don’t they can that manager too? He’s boring everyone there into a team-wide depresssion I believe.

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Truce

Give him to San Diego

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 22, 2010 3:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

The Padres are buyers!

I love it!

Id like to see it. They can afford to give up pitching talent since anybody can be a good starter in San Diego right?

Hart would help them I think. I have NO idea why everybody is so down on Corey Hart. He’s a decent ballplayer, in his prime, decent glove too.

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

His defense is supposedly below average

he’s probably not as bad as UZR says he is (-10 IIRC), but he’s not a great defender. He is also having a career year:

2010 OPS+: 142
Career OPS+: 111

Getting Hart now would be buying high and I think this level of performance is unsustainable

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 22, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope it doesn’t come to ATL, especially for the deal you mentioned.

by Braves24 on Jul 22, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

RE: "Carlos Zambrano (if he has any demand)"

Well then why not include anybody with an albatross contract who’s underperforming.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 21, 2010 10:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Again..

I just tossed out some random names. That list isnt inclusive or exclusive, was merely a way to hit the word limit. There have been a number of Zambrano rumors out there though.

by ADLC on Jul 21, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

You called?

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 22, 2010 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ted Lilly

Quick question to throw out there…

If your team is looking for a SP and Ted Lilly is available, what would you be willing to give up to get him?

I’d appreciate names, but a general overview would work, too.

by Outshined_One on Jul 22, 2010 12:21 AM EDT reply actions  

tough call

He’s a Type A at the end of the year, so the Cubs would need a really strong offer for him. Potentially big off-season for the team with regard to setting up next year’s draft, with Lilly being a Type A and Lee and Ramirez both being Type Bs.

Of course, I’m guessing the Cubs management will respond to this opportunity by resigning all three players to 4 year deals.

by mrkupe on Jul 22, 2010 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

I remember seeing something a couple of weeks back

where it was mentioned the Cubs would trade Lilly with an understanding they’d re-sign him in the offseason. The Cubs 1st rounder would be protected at this point, so a team would be looking at supplemental and 2nd round picks for him at best. Great start last night notwithstanding, I’d say Lilly could bring back a B grade prospect in trade though it should be from an NL team only. I’m not sure he’d survive the AL at this point.

http://bullpenbanter.com

by gatling on Jul 22, 2010 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ramirez

Isn’t a free agent next year that I’m aware of. He’ll be playing for a huge 2012 contract – club option – next season.

Lee and Lilly are though.

Here’s a crazy idea to float out there for fun – if the Cubs could get out from under the Zambrano contact somehow and with the Derek Lee money … big offer to Albert Pujols?!?!?

No, Im not a Cubs fan, though Im sure Id make a few of them happy with that thought eh?

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

You think he's going to opt out of $16M for 2011?

I know that he’s absolutely killing the ball right now, but I have a tough time believing that Aramis will turn down a $16M salary for 2011.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

How to get Lilly

The Cubs should give Lilly away to the first team willing to take Zambrano’s contract too

by FI2 on Jul 22, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Cubs are going to pass up those picks?

I’d consider the Zambrano deal spent money for the most part and just wait to deal him for other bad contracts to fill slots on a rebuilding team. Hold Lilly and Lee, take the picks next year. Getting out from under the big contracts would matter a lot more if the team had some legitimate major league cornerstones on the roster – they really don’t other than perhaps Starlin Castro. As is, they might as well just focus on player development.

by mrkupe on Jul 24, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Prince

Gordon and Hudson from White Sox to Mil for Feilder? Makes a ton of sense. White sox move vizquel to 2nd and start viceido with konerko at 1st and feilder Dhing?

What do you think?

by bigphisig on Jul 22, 2010 1:09 AM EDT reply actions  

No

The crew view Hudson as a #4 and need higher ceiling pitching in return. I love GBecks, and I know Melvin & co do as well—but they will look to re-sign Weeks to a reasonable deal and with Esco there is not much of a real need for Gordy…The sox simply do not have the prospects to make this work, even though Prince would be a perfect fit for them.

by St.Steve on Jul 22, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I concur

"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day."
-Frank Sinatra

by Kerm on Jul 22, 2010 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

I concur as well but it makes you wonder: where is the fit for Fielder? I’m not sure there is one.

by FI2 on Jul 22, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

the only ones the I have seen

and said from May on have been BOS and SF…They both could use the big bat, have enough prospects [especially pitching] and could actually be able to sign Prince to an extension [and also afford the 17+ MM that is coming his way via arb next year]…

by St.Steve on Jul 22, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oswalt rumor

IM a cardinal fan and talks have been Houston has been scouting our minors. So maybe Oswalt for Miller and bryan Anderson and craig? Replaces catcher, sp and 1st base next year. I realize miller is not ready and wont be up that soon. BUt he is a big prospect in a few years.

by bigphisig on Jul 22, 2010 1:11 AM EDT reply actions  

As a Cardinals fan

you should hate that deal.
It’s quite possible Oswalt will be paid more than he’s worth over the next year and a half. There’s also talk he wants his 2012 team option (15 mil, I believe) guaranteed.
Unless the Astros eat a ton of salary, it’d be tough to stomach giving up big-time talent like Shelby Miller.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 22, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

I figure some GM will fork over too much for Oswalt, but I don’t see Mozeliak being that guy. Seems more like a Ruben Amaro move.

http://bullpenbanter.com

by gatling on Jul 22, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

REALLY!

Having a rotation of carpenter, wainright and Oswalt in the playoffs for 3 more years is not worth a guy we drafted number 1 next year? Hes years away. We can win now. Even as a Cardinal fan I do this deal, our problem is the money!

MIller is the big peice but he is an unknown.
Anderson is a decent catcher but we cant use him soon.
Craig or any other player JAY?, IM even willing to give them a boggs type too. Are all depth we can afford to lose.

by bigphisig on Jul 22, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

You're confusing Roy Oswalt with ROY OSWALT

I don’t think he’s the same guy anymore.

by FI2 on Jul 22, 2010 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Am I missing something?

Lifetime ERA 3.22
This year 3.12

Lifetime Ks/9 7.4
This year 8.5

Lifetime BBs per 9/ 2.1
This year 2.4

… and its not like hes been throwing the ball poorly lately or anything. He tosseda 1-Hitter 2 starts ago. He’ll be 33 in late August, not 43. He’s younger than Chris Carpenter and you don’t see anybody giving him grief about his age.

by casejud on Jul 22, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

This after putting up

3.76 and 3.8 FIPs in the two prior years. It’s highly unlikely he’s improved at the age of 33.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 22, 2010 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Player performance is not uniform

I know there is a temptation to paint any kind of lesser performances a pattern of decline, especially in players above the age of thirty, but in reality it doesn’t necessarily work that way. Sometimes a player has a down year, or a couple down years, and then has a big resurgence for awhile.

This is especially true for pitchers, who don’t have nearly as predictable an aging curve as position players. Pitchers are more prone to career ending injuries but they can also sometimes perform at the same high level for a much longer time than a hitter.

In reality, Roy Oswalt has been remarkably consistent for a pitcher, and if 3.76 and 3.80 FIP are a pair of down seasons for him, and the worst seasons of his career… that’s fantastic. You won’t find that kind of consistency from any starter on the trade market this season, including the already-traded Cliff Lee.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's unlikely

Oswalt puts up another season like this. I realize a career isn’t entirely a bell curve, but it doesn’t stand by much reason. He’s also a very highly compensated player… Oswalt will make 38 million dollars from now until the end of 2012 if his last year does get guaranteed. He’d have to put up 9.5 WAR simply to be worth his contract. How much to be worth Miller alone? Let’s say Shelby Miller is between the 26th and 50th best prospect in baseball. Victor Wang values those guys at 4.44 WAR.
For Miller alone, Oswalt would have to be worth 13.9 wins above replacement over 2 2/5 seasons. To say that’s unrealistic would be kind.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 22, 2010 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm amazed how few people understand

Two important factors:

1. The value of a marginal win is significantly higher to a team contending for the postseason. A playoff appearance is very valuable, and making it deep into the playoffs is even moreso. So basically your calculations are completely bunk until you factor that in. And it’s a very important factor, likely almost doubling the value of each win.

2. An elite player like Roy Oswalt costs extra. Ace starting pitchers, middle of the order power bats—these players don’t get moved without a serious price involved. Even moreso when they are the face of a franchise like Oswalt is.

And no, I don’t think it’s that unlikely that Oswalt continues to perform like this. 6 wins may be pushing it but I don’t think 5 is unreasonable at all. And I don’t see any evidence that he has declined at all going by his velocity and peripherals over the past years. If anything I think you’re looking at normal variation, and perhaps him being mentally out of his game a little playing for a bad team for the past few years.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand the value increases

for playoff teams. I did a similar calculation for my own team, the Rangers, when they acquired Cliff Lee.
I agree with you to an extent. Why? Because while the Rangers wouldn’t win any deal in terms of overall value, he was a fantastic fit for the team. Why? He was replacing a truly replacement-level bevy of 5th starters (Harden, Harrison, Nippert) and (along with Lewis and Wilson/Hunter) creating a very strong playoff top 3. He also included a near-guarantee of two very high draft picks. Additionally, the Rangers’ system is very deep and can weather the loss of a few players.
Add to that fact that the Rangers have never won a playoff series and a surge could create great things for the franchise and its fans. If the Rangers so much as got to the ALCS, people would be giddy.

Oswalt is not on Lee’s level. Not this year, not last year, nor the year before. He’s paid substantially more. The Cardinals’ top 3 is already exceptionally strong. Shelby Miller is their only prospect who can be considered a top-tier guy.

If the Cardinals win a world series, It’s a win. There’s no other situation in which they’d come out on top.

I haven’t seen any study that elite players are worth more per win. Can you find a study on that front? I’m legitimately curious.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 22, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why is Oswalt not better than Haren this year?

In terms of ERA, Oswalt beats him 3.12 to 4.60. In terms of FIP, 3.23 to 3.92. In terms of xFIP, it’s tighter, but 3.42 to 3.39, so if you go only by that stat, then Haren is basically tied with Oswalt. For the previous two years, sure, Haren was better, but considering we’re talking basically about a one-year rental, this year’s performance seems to be the most important

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jul 23, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't bring up Haren

But let’s go into that. Haren is significantly younger, and has one of the friendliest contracts of any proven starter in baseball. His track record in the 3 previous years is just as impressive as Roy’s, if not more so. Better this year? Maybe, maybe not. But I certainly wouldn’t give up anywhere near as much for Oswalt.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 23, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haren is indeed good

But I think his so-called team-friendly contract has been overstated and the Astros could easily equal it by kicking in some money. Haren is owed $25.5M in 2011 and 2012. He has a 2013 option for $15.5M with a $3.5M buyout.

If Oswalt does demand his option be picked up, he will be guaranteed $32M in those two years.

This season is another story… Haren is owed a lot less money this year. But if the Astros could be convinced to kick in, say, $10M, it would be pretty equal in my opinion.

by OremLK on Jul 23, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also

I have a suspicion that teams may indeed like Oswalt more as a pitcher for this season. Not just because he’s performing better than Haren this year, but also because he’s a power arm who gives up fewer fly balls. Haren is more of a finesse fly ball pitcher. There are pros and cons to each, to be certain… but I know AL teams in particular are more skeptical of guys who profile like Haren.

by OremLK on Jul 23, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Indeed

but we’ve long been told Drayton McLane has a sense of inflated worth for his stars, which makes it tough to deal with that team. I don’t know that he’d be willing to throw in 10 million unless he was getting some really special prospects back.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 23, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

But maybe if Ed Wade can sell it to him as “buying the prospects” he would do it. I wouldn’t have thought it possible before this year, but then they went and gave the fifth largest signing bonus in the history of international free agency to Ariel Ovando.

by OremLK on Jul 23, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry

I’m not quite sure how I mis-read Lee as Haren. Some weird version of dyslexia, maybe?

As to your point, I entirely agree that over the next few years, Haren will likely be better than Oswalt. But, if we’re talking about just this year (which I think any team asking for one of them will be), then it’s a much closer call

TheSouthWing.com - A Magazine of essays, prose and poems

by OldProspects on Jul 23, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oswalt dealt with back issues more than usual the past two years, right?

It’s quite possible his down years were partially injury related, and now he’s been mostly healthy this season.

Granted the injury risk is high on Oswalt, but it doesn’t look like his performance if healthy should be a worry at this point.

by oplaid on Jul 22, 2010 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

John Lackey?

There was little outrage when the “smartest” GM in baseball agreed to pay Lackey a similar wage at a similar age for someone who might slightly behind Oswalt from a talent standpoint.

Fat man is no more,
Bursting on through Heaven's Door
Come on in, says Bill

by Wilbur Wood on Jul 23, 2010 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

The only way we give up Shelby Miller this offseason is if we are getting Dan Haren

Oswalt should cost like… nothing.

Giving up like Hawksworth and Jon Jay or something random like that should be enough to get Oswalt, with his contract.

The interesting thing with him is how much leverage the Astros have in this considering the reports that Oswalt wants to come to the Cardinals and will defer money on his option to make it happen. If the Cardinals are Oswalt’s only real choice, then the Astros really won’t be able to do anything other than drop him for relatively nothing.

Either way, I’m a bit apprehensive about picking up Oswalt. I’d much rather get Haren back, even if it costs us Shelby Miller. If we get Oswalt for some random prospect like Lance Lynn or something, though, I won’t complain too much.

by oplaid on Jul 22, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

You really think you can get him for that

He is, at worst, a top 25 starter. His whip and fip are identical to Ubaldo’s numbers, and hes in the top 20 in pretty much every statistical catergory. He’ll be 35 at the end of his option year, and hasn’t shown signs of regression.

Plus, as I said, $16M is actually pretty reasonable. Look at the deal Lackey just signed this past off season. Ben Sheets, Andy Petitte and Randy Wolf all got better then 10M/per

by ADLC on Jul 22, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are right that $16M is reasonable

What I just randomly threw out there probably won’t work, but my main point would be that it shouldn’t cost Shelby Miller.

$16M is reasonable, but Oswalt isn’t providing any surplus value over that $16M, even if he remains healthy, so why not just take that $16M and spend it on Cliff Lee in this offseason? Oswalt’s trade value is much less than say, Dan Haren, because he isn’t providing any surplus value over the amount of money he will be paid over the course of the deal. That’s why Haren would cost a Miller but Oswalt likely should not.

Granted the Astros may be asking for that, and if the Astros are required to front some of the money for the deal they may get that, but with the way Oswalt controls his fate and gets to decide which teams to waive his no-trade for, I doubt the Astros will receive what they really want.

by oplaid on Jul 23, 2010 12:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

A rotation of Carpenter, Wainright, and Oswalt in the playoffs would be crazy.

by Braves24 on Jul 22, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oswalt/Werth/prospects 3 way with the Phillies/Rays/Astros still being talked about

Stark reported that Phillies for some reason need to dump Werth to afford Oswalt and if that is the case it lowers his value. I don’t see the Rays offering Davis, or either of the top 2 prospects for him. I could see a deal involving say Moore or Colome and a Justin Ruggiano or lower level prospect for Werth.

by Dbullsfan on Jul 22, 2010 2:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Moore + Cruz

I’d much much rather see Colome go, and I like Cruz, just thinking of a C+ type of guy who is on he rise in Cruz. I’d consider a deal based around Davis for Werth

by Navi's_Navy on Jul 22, 2010 3:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

For Davis

I’m not sure the Rays wouldn’t want something more in return. I don’t know, maybe the draft picks help even it out.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 23, 2010 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I saw somewhere that the Phillies asked for Upton or Davis when the Rays inquired on Werth, so I think you’re right about this.

Anyway, my current obsession is with trading Werth somewhere (Tampa makes the most sense) in exchange for the “young major league pitching” Arizona wants for Haren. If Arizona would take Davis, Happ, and a midlevel piece or two for Haren (and I honestly think they might), then I’d even be in favor of the Phis ponying up Werth+ to get Davis.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 24, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds like the Yankees and the Tigers are in the lead for Haren, of course you never know with the way the rumor mill goes.

by OremLK on Jul 24, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seems like most of the Big Leagues is interested in Joel Hanrahan....

I hope NH sticks to a high asking price, because Hanrahan is just filthy. 59/14 K/BB rate in some forty innings, I believe. Plus, batters are hitting under .200 against him.

The Nats got taken in that deal, especially with Milledge tearing it up right now. Not a good move on Washington’s part…..

by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 22, 2010 9:43 AM EDT reply actions  

When Rangers asked about him recently

the Pirates told them it would cost Neftali Feliz. Pirates aren’t looking to move him unless they get wayyyyy overpaid.

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

A difference that I perceive

Is that Littlefield was asking that for players who were going to walk. I remember he told the Angels he wanted a young starting pitcher, a top SP prospect, and a midlevel hitting prospect for the last few months of Craig Wilson.

Huntington just doesn’t want to get rid of Hanrahan, so he’s setting the bar at a ludicrous level just in case somebody fell down and hit their head before they dialed him. He’s not seriously expecting his demands to be met, and he’s not initiating the call and then insulting the other GMs. That I know of at least.

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why?

If someone’s interested in one (or more) of the Pirates’s relievers, he should be dealt. There simply is no reason for a 100 loss team to hold onto relief pitching. Meek, Carrasco, Hanrahan, Dotel should all be dealt.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not against dealing any of them.

But they shouldn’t be given away. All but Dotel are playing for relative peanuts, and all are doing a decent to excellent job this season. Hanrahan looks like he could be a dynamite closer for a team, and there’s a lot of value there I believe, so why not take advantage of that value and ask for a high return? If nobody is willing to meet that return, you can ship Dotel out for a lower return, and let Hanrahan close, where his value should be even greater next year, assuming he’s good in that role as well.

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is likely true for basically every team in the league.

But if the Pirates went out and paid Cliff Lee to be the ace and got any kind of contribution from Morton/Veal/Hart/anybody next season, the Pirates wouldn’t be bad at all, and would still have a lot of potential help in the minors.

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Relievers are exceedingly unreliable from year to year

You deal them off while they have value, or else face a Matt Capps situation. This team is not anywhere close to competing and there is no minor league help coming for a few years.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 22, 2010 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's middle relievers though.

These two could each close, and have elite stuff. It’s not like they’re LOOGY’s or swingmen having decent years. They could be seen as two dominant closer types coming of age.

Or, they could fall apart next year and you could be right. But I like them much more than I have liked Capps for years.

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotta disagree with you there jar75

Hanrahan and Meek are very valuable assets that shouldn’t be moved unless the trade is substantial. They are bullpen arms yes but that makes it perfectly logical to keep two.

One will probably stay this good and will be more valuable to the Pirates over the next 3-4 years (their impending contention window). Considering their return will more than likely be maybe one B or B+ prospect plus a C or C+ high upside guy and a throw-in (mainly because other teams realize as well that relievers are volatile), why not just keep both.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

That said

I’d love to move them if we could get back what we wanted. Obviously the Rangers said no to Feliz but something like Font, Beltre, Kiker/Ross would certainly peak my interest.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crap

Pique! Embarrassing…

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 22, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

they are having good seasons

but not elite, and nothing really suggests that either are going to become elite relievers, although they both have opportunities to be well-above-average RPs, which are valuable, but definitely not worth a B/C+/throw-in package Mr. McCutchenIsTheTruth.

In my opinion, if Pittsburg got Font or Beltre and 2 throw-ins (certainly not of Robbie Ross’s abilities) straight up for either of Meek/Hanrahan, it would certainly be a good trade for them. Relievers are just too unreliable to consistently maintain good performance year to year, and I don’t know how you could justify giving up 3 valued assets in return for one above-average RP

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 22, 2010 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can't justify that kind of a package

but why do I want Font who may never be better than Hanrahan or Meek and if he does it’s not for a while, especially considering when the Pirates are on the cusp of competing for a playoff spot (obviously not this year, but if NH is an aggressive buyer which he’s hinted at, next year isn’t out of the question).

Keep them around unless you’re floored with the offer.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 23, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still wholeheartedly disagree

You want to get value out of the relievers when they still have value. As I said before, it is very difficult for RPs to maintain value on a yearly basis, and to do so, means that you are one of the more elite relievers in the game; which neither Hanrahan or Meek is. Getting cost-controlled assets, as Wilmer Font would be, is the best way to build a winning franchise, by building a solid foundation. You are correct that Font won’t be ready by next season, but I really can’t see Pittsburgh competing for a playoff spot in 2011. I mean, their rotation is just so awful that they would need every single player on their roster to outplay expectations next year to even have a shot at the playoffs; you don’t play baseball in mid-late September with a rotation that features 2 average pitchers at best, and then 3 guys that would be swingmen on any other .500 team, and it’s not like Brad Lincoln, Rudy Owens, or Daniel McCutchen is going to make that big of a difference next season.

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 23, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

the Pirates are on the cusp of competing for a playoff spot (obviously not this year

Say what?!

by Jeff Reese on Jul 23, 2010 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

inoseriously

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 23, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

The lineup might be close, but that rotation is going to suck

Obviously a lineup with McCutchen, Alvarez, Tabata, Walker and Milledge is going to score some runs, but I honestly have no idea how the Pirates could build a quality starting rotation in the next couple years.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 23, 2010 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

They can't

And while Lastings has been better than I thought he’d be, I’m not sold that he’s a wRC+ 103 type of hitter. Given his poor defense in the outfield, I don’t think he’s a winning piece.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 24, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do you build a winning rotation?

Trade for Carmona (a legitimate rumor), sign a free agent or two (which isn’t out of the realm of possibility – NH has hinted at it), and keep the pieces in place.

If you do trade for Carmona and sign say Bedard to a 2 year deal (yes his health is a risk, but for a low budget team its a risk that makes sense to me) …

then come 2012 the rotation options would be Maholm, Duke, Morton, Ohlendorf, Carmona, Bedard, Hart, Ascino, Veal, and the quartet of AA arms (Locke, Morris, Wilson, and Owens).

Does that make a great rotation. Not in the least. It’s probably won’t even be average, but combined with the bullpen (which you keep in place anchored by Meek and Hanrahan – Yes I know relievers are volatile, especially from year to year but you can’t have much better building blocks than Meek and Hanrahan) and the lineup its a plausibility that such a team would be in contention in a weak NL central that will get worse over the next two years.

Houston is terrible, the Cubs and Brewers are trending down, the Cardinals are treading water (granted they are very good) and the Reds are on the rise. That picture painted, if the Pirates also add say Stephen Drew (another somewhat legit rumor) then why not 2012 with a chance as early as next year

Personally, I’d rather be sellers and move as many people as we can, and shoot for a more realistic 2013 breakout followed by real contention in 2014, but its not as bleak as most think.

Da'Sean Butler - A Mountaineer Legend

by McCutchenIsTheTruth on Jul 24, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Feliz for Hanrahan is a rumor, jar75......

And, even if true, that makes you think DL and NH are similar?

You obviously have an irrational hatred for NH, which is fine.

But, you make some really stupid comments because of it.

by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 22, 2010 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

And, I would trade Meek for less than Hanrahan....

Both are pretty good, but Hanrahan has better stuff and I think a better season. Meek was quite lucky in the first half of the season in my opinion.

Hanrahan has the best pitch of the two as well (that being his slider).

If they were moved, there has to be a pretty good return. No urgency to move them, in my opinion.

And, if you don’t think the Pirates are going to get any help in the ‘next 2-3 years’ from their minors, you simply don’t know their minors, especially pitching at the Double A level.

by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 22, 2010 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a pretty strong rumor referring to Pirates asking price.

In no way did either team expect that to transpire though.

Are you saying it’s only a rumor or using it as proof of Hanrahan’s value?

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm simply saying we don't know if that transaction was actually discussed....

And, I agree…..NH didn’t think it would happen, just like the Rangers didn’t.

I just don’t get the big deal (if it did happen) why someone would be saying that is further evidence of NH being like DL.

The two couldn’t be further apart…..

by CabreraKilledMyChildhood on Jul 22, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

DK is pretty reliable.

It’s a rumor that he’s printing.

by Woo! on Jul 22, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't get

Why everyone is talking like $15 million per is so out of line for Oswalt. Its not like hes ancient, and outside of W/L his numbers compare favorably to others in his pay range. Would you rather have Lackey or Lowe?

by ADLC on Jul 22, 2010 9:45 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

he is a really solid #2 right now and going forward…I think it is just the consistent back flare ups that have some scared…

by St.Steve on Jul 22, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

No. 2?

I’d say he’s a no. 1, albeit on the low end side. He has the 16th best FIP among qualified starters this season, the 11th best xFIP, and the 19th best ERA. He hasn’t had any back issues this year either.

In terms of what he’s projected to do going forward, by ZiPS and such, it’s slightly below those numbers, but not by much.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would qualify “No. 1 starter” as “the top thirty pitchers in baseball”, just to be clear.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

I agree with your reasoning…

by St.Steve on Jul 22, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I find it bizarre as well. John Lackey is averaging about $16M per year for his age 31-35 seasons. In the free agency market, you could get never an equal or better pitcher of similar age on a two-year (or 2.5, I guess) deal at the same per-year cost.

by limozeen on Jul 22, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not out of line for Oswalt

It’s exactly what he’s worth, basically. He has picked up his pitching this season, but the past two years were down years so it’s not like you can expect him to continue pitching at this year’s level for the rest of his contract.

If he’s getting paid exactly what he’s worth, that means he has basically no trade value since you could just use that money in the free agent market to pick up those wins without trading away assets. Oswalt’s no trade clause makes it even tougher to get assets back in return as the Astros really have little leverage to make out in this situation.

by oplaid on Jul 22, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

need oswalt now not later

I agree but his value is for a team that wants to add now not in FA after the season. Plus him being signed for 1-2 more years actually should increase his value of course taht depends on payroll concerns which is why the cardinals dont have him yet. If we coudl get him for craig, andserson and something like Lynn, Mortenson or hawkswroth we do it in a second.

by bigphisig on Jul 22, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Do you Cardinals fans

Honestly believe the Astros are going to give up their best pitcher in franchise history for grade C trash? Seriously?

Any discussions for him begin with Shelby Miller. In fact, given the quality of your farm system (or lack thereof), you’re going to pretty much need to give Ed Wade a blank check to get this deal done.

If that’s too much for you? Too bad. We’ll trade him to somebody else, or hang onto him.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Eat his salary and take Miller and other Cardinals blue chippers

Simple as that.

"Swingles is Day to Day: IE: He’s being turned into a zombie, but they don’t want the world to know for another 5 days (retroactive)" ~Zonis

by Blicks on Jul 22, 2010 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Miller is the only Cardinals blue chipper

But sure, I’d eat some (not all) of his salary for a package of Miller, Craig, Vasquez, and Schneider.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

When did Miller sign?

Memory is that he didn’t sign until sometime last August, which (if I remember the rule correctly) would prevent him from being traded until the first anniverery of that date. Right?

by Toad on Jul 24, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would have read better with “anniversary”

by Toad on Jul 24, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, you’re right actually. He didn’t sign until the middle of August. I think he could still be included as a PTBNL though.

by OremLK on Jul 24, 2010 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Technically

but to get around the 1 year from date of signing you make him a PTBNL, which gives you a 6 month window from the date you make the trade.

http://bullpenbanter.com

by gatling on Jul 24, 2010 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. While I don’t think the Stros are going to get an earth-shattering haul for Oswalt — that’s just the nature of the beast as teams become more and more aware of the value of cost-controlled players — there’s simply no way the Cardinals can pull this off without surrendering Miller. I’m sorry, but the Jay/Hawksworth package mentioned above is laughable. You have to give up SOMETHING of value to get Oswalt.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 22, 2010 6:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

not sure about the are you serious part

If you look at my initial post I said the deal starts with miller and then I added a catching prospect and a hitter in the bigs that would replace the Berkman loss next year too. I dont think a bunch of trash has a chance but I said I would love it if it did.

by bigphisig on Jul 22, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was replying

To the nut I replied to above. Who said “Oswalt should cost… nothing” Then suggested Hawksworth and Jay are a even value. People have a really screwed up sense of his contract I think. Even if teams have to pick up his option 2yrs/32 is pretty reasonable considering what elite pitchers cost on the open market. And you are picking him up for a title run, which increases value.

by ADLC on Jul 22, 2010 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

reading joe strauss' article

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/article_4cb78092-16c7-5743-a56d-5323f0df8191.html

certainly makes me wonder whether or nor this trade will happen. He said

The offer was rejected earlier this week and included shortstop Brendan Ryan and another player. The Astros are seeking more players, hoping to include at least one minor-league player.

by toonsterwu on Jul 24, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

haha

Yeah, I would hope the Astros could get more than the .185-hitting Brendan Ryan and another random player. No reason to trade Oswalt in that case. Sounds like the Cards think they are the sole player in this market.

by mrkupe on Jul 25, 2010 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't think so

The rumors I’m hearing is that the Phillies are still hard after Oswalt, and are focused more on him than on Haren. Based on what I’m hearing currently, they sound like the most logical destination if he gets moved at all, and Astros president Tal Smith said this morning that he thinks Oswalt will be traded.

The Dodgers are also in but I don’t know how serious talks are.

by OremLK on Jul 25, 2010 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s especially insulting when the poster in question doesn’t even take the time to find out if it’s trash the Astros have use for. Jon Jay? Okay, fringe guy who could maybe be useful as a bench outfielder… except the Astros have three guys exactly like that at AAA right now, all having good seasons.

by OremLK on Jul 22, 2010 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

the Rays are "kicking the tires" with the Royals about Zach Greinke

while unlikely the Rays definitely have the pieces to make this deal happen if they want too. Depending on what the Royals want they can either go quantity or quality with TB. A package with Davis, Joyce, Moore, Lobstein or a Hellickson, Joyce, Lobstein

by Dbullsfan on Jul 23, 2010 4:05 PM EDT reply actions  

The Rays would definitely need to give up quantity for him

I have to imagine the Royals would want a package starting with Jennings and then a number of additional high upside prospects. I could maybe see the packages you proposed working. But if they’re looking to trade Grienke at all, it’s so they can fill a whole bunch of holes. One other name to throw into the mix would be Sean Rodriguez I guess, since you could move Zobrist back to 2B.

That said, I’m not confident that Grienke isn’t just getting worse. Walks are down a hair, but strikeouts are down significantly and home runs are way up. Some guys just have really short peaks.

Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."

by Brickhaus on Jul 23, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rays have the pieces...

…but is Greinke really enough better than their current pitchers to give up what he’s going to cost? There’s got to be some concern about his regression back to career norms after the career year last season.

He’s still a fantastic pitcher, no doubt, but he doesn’t seem to be the Best Pitcher In Baseball™ he appeared to have become last year.

It just seems like Haren or Oswalt would be cheaper (in prospects, at least) for a similar upgrade, if the Rays are even looking for pitching at all.

by OremLK on Jul 23, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haren traded to the Angels

Diamondbacks traded Haren to Angels for Joe Saunders, Patrick Corbin, Rafael Rodriguez and a player to be named.

by jibs on Jul 25, 2010 6:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Which, as a Rangers fan

makes me so goddamn angry I want to punch myself.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 25, 2010 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't decide

If the package that they got for him will lower Oswalt’s package value, or the fact that he is off the market drive up the price.

I also can’t think of a season where three pitchers as good as Lee-Haren-Oswalt all got moved.

by ADLC on Jul 26, 2010 7:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Adam Dunn

What grade prospects would you be willing to give up for Dunn?

by mwyche on Jul 26, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd imagine

He’s worth one top 100 prospect or somewhere close to that, but not as much as Cliff Lee brought back.

by OremLK on Jul 26, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think

He is the big bat on the market, with a team thats not that motivated to move him. Its gonna take a Smoak level prospect at least, either a A-/B+ guy or a young player with few years of team control.

by ADLC on Jul 26, 2010 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

White Sox

So, Im the White Sox, who have had zero production from the left side, and have three pretty rotten bats getting regular ABs in Kotsay, Jones and Pierre I would think Adam Dunn is a no brainer. Wouldn’t some combination of Mitchell or Danks with a couple lower ceiling arms work for both teams?

by ADLC on Jul 26, 2010 6:31 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't see why the Sox would give up a stud like Danks

plus Mitchell, who’s got huge upside, plus a couple more cost-controlled assets, for 2 months of a defensive liability, even if that defender is one of the better bats in baseball

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 26, 2010 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well..

He can DH in Chicago if they can live with CQ playing left. Otherwise, he could play a passable def himself. Pierre has been god awful. I don’t care how fast you are, a .321 OBP is just horrific.

I figured it was Mitchell or Danks and a couple other players. (And I meant Jordan Danks btw, Im not dumb enough to suggest them trading John.)

by ADLC on Jul 26, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

arggg

sorry about that, totally forgot both of the Danks brothers were in the same org. Still, if WAS was able to land just Jared Mitchell for Adam Dunn, I’d consider that a terrific move for them. Even with the injury, I think he’s going to be an extremely good baseball player.

Adoptive parent of Kyle Nicholson

by gore51 on Jul 26, 2010 10:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Minor League Ball Gameday, 5/25 MILB
Me_at_8_small
Minor League Ball Gameday Discussion, MiLB 5/24
Me_at_8_small
Today in Minor League Baseball Discussion, MiLB 5/23
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/22
Me_at_8_small
MiLB 5/21

Recent FanPosts

Small
Washington Nationals MOD 3
Xander_small
Red Sox MOD: Draft Room
Small
Padres MOD #4 (Final MOD)
Henrik-lundqvist-crossed-pads_small
MOD: Mets #6 (2012 Review)
Small
Good luck everyone.....
Small
Toronto Blue Jays MOD #6
Timmyace_small
MLB Mock Draft Round 1, 1s, 2, 3
Small
MOD#6 - Rangers (2nd Round - 93rd Pick)
Molina_small
Cardinals MOD #3

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Editors

Small Craig Goldstein

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter