Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

The Top 20 Position Players Age 25 & Under

Evan_longoria_20_medium

via www.sawxblog.com

Here's my list. What's yours?

Full article: http://bit.ly/9v5yYl

The Top 20 Position Players Age 25 & Under

  1. Evan Longoria
  2. Justin Upton
  3. Troy Tulowitzki
  4. Ryan Zimmerman
  5. Jason Heyward
  6. Carlos Santana
  7. Carlos Gonzalez
  8. Buster Posey
  9. Colby Rasmus
  10. Matt Wieters
  11. Domonic Brown
  12. Bryce Harper
  13. Mike Trout
  14. Matt Kemp
  15. Jay Bruce
  16. Desmond Jennings
  17. Gordon Beckham
  18. Andrew McCutchen
  19. Mike Stanton
  20. Delmon Young

 

 

The Rationale

1. Evan Longoria - An elite bat and historically good defender at an important position. Bill James once wrote that he considered writing a book about the greatest team ever but that he decided it against doing the project. His rationale was that you can't write a book saying the 1927 Murderer's Row Yankees were the GOAT because its been said 1,000 times... but you also can't write a book saying they aren't the GOAT - because they were. Longoria is the '27 Yankees of these kind of lists. I hope to give you something worth reading despite that, though.

2. Justin Upton - All the talent and tools with production to match. He still has room to grow his game and that's kind of frightening. A number of similar players made my list here... in fact, a full 10 of the 20 are NL outfielder. I was disturbed when I looked up and noticed this. Upton is a similar player to a number of these guys... but he's the best of them.

Star-divide

10. Matt Wieters - If he had retained his prospect status last season I likely would have slotted him behind Strasburg and ahead of Heyward. Obviously his stock is down from there. Why the struggles? I think its the same thing as Gordon Beckham. He never had to deal with a slump before and his confidence has slipped. Its very, very hard to play baseball well when you aren't confident in your game. My gut says he still ends up better than Posey... but I can't give him the edge when Posey is executing so well. Pretty shocking that in the year since his MLB debut not one but TWO young catchers have surpassed him.

20. Delmon Young - I never gave up on Delmon... but I do think that what you see now is what you will get in the future. His approach at the plate doesn't leave a lot of room for further growth and I see no reason to think his glove will improve. He's turned himself into a very valuable player so far and I think the Twins will happily take that.

 

HM: Ackley, Andrus, Butler, Fowler, AJax, Jesus Montero, Moustakas, Will Myers, Snider & Ian Stewart

Dustin Ackley - He'll be fine. I'm not one of those who jumped off the bandwagon. I'm just not comfortable going any higher with his defensive issues and lack of power.

Elvis Andrus - Lack of secondary skills still an issue.

Billy Butler - Really love the bat, but prefer lesser bats with defensive value. Tough call.

 

More explanation in the full article. Articles on the Top 20 Pitchers Age 25 & Under and a wrap up focused on The Best Fantasy Prospect Age 25 & Under will be posted in the next few days.

As always, thanks for reading. Very interested to hear the opinions of the many posters I respect here. Thanks again...

-alskor

Comment 190 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This was really difficult.

It sounded fun when I started it… but man, torture to make some of these decisions. The pitchers were even worse. I expect a lot of negative feedback on that one. Just brutal.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Question

I love the rankings and will try to think of mine later. Why did you put Jennings ahead of McCutcheon when McCutcheon is already performing at a high level in the majors and they both have similar skill sets.

by King Billy Royal on Jul 15, 2010 9:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Power projection probably.

by jfish26101 on Jul 15, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was one I debated for awhile.

its still too early to make a call on McCutchen’s glove, but what we do have shows him as an average at best defender. Both UZR and +/- are pretty negative on him… but I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt anyway and say he’ll be fine. His glove has always been a little bit of an issue, though. From BP in 2008:

[McCutchen] often needs to compensate with speed to make up for his poor jumps.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8393

I think there’s at least some evidence that Jennings can be a plus defender. TotalZone really likes him. He’s virtually the same tool set as McCutchen but with better jumps on balls. Jennings’ routes need some work, but I’m much more optimistic that will improve over McCutchen’s jumps.

Basically, I think McCutchen will have a little more power but that Jennings will more than make up for that difference by walking a bit more and playing a better CF. Its certainly not a big difference, though. They’re super close and if someone wanted to flip them I wouldn’t bicker with them.

& thanks for the kind words.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting…

So you think McCutchen is likely to have more power than Jennings? Do you think either can sustain a SLG above .450 then?

Seems people really though Jennings would develop power. Trout seems to have taken over that camp by storm.

by jfish26101 on Jul 15, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

a little more power?

Have you seen McCutchen’s bat speed? It’s sick. I watched him go after a 98 mph fastball late and still hit it out in front of the zone and yanked it foul. Absolutely crushed it. I think it was against Verlander.

If he doesn’t have power it won’t be from lack of bat speed.

by pedrophile on Jul 17, 2010 1:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, it won't

His power does primarily come from bat speed/squaring up the ball, I agree. Jennings also has great bat speed and squares up the ball. I really don’t see McCutchen hitting a tremendous amount of HRs. I’d grade Jennings maybe a 45-50 potential power and McCutchen maybe a 50-55.

by alskor on Jul 17, 2010 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but McCutchen could really rack up doubles and triples with his speed

I think it’s fair to say that McCutchen’s power is superior to Jennings’ power.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 17, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. In fact I said so above.

I just think Jennings will be a superior defender enough that it overtakes the difference in SLG.

by alskor on Jul 17, 2010 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also...

is it your contention that Jennings won’t similarly use his speed…?

by alskor on Jul 17, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, he absolutely will

I wasn’t saying that Jennings wouldn’t, but merely that McCutchen could probably get some additional XBH solely from using his speed, something that Jennings can presumably do as well.

McCutchen can still put up a pretty high ISO even with only 15-25 homers if he’s got 40+ doubles and around double-digits in triples.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 18, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve never done a ranking list perse so I always have a hard time being critical of anyone who takes on the task.

That said, Myers seems awfully high. The 28th player in all of baseball (any level)? I’m guessing you are expecting him to not only stick at C but be above average defensively? Placing him 28th on a prospect list is one thing but it seems awfully aggressive when you throw in all the MLB guys to.

by jfish26101 on Jul 15, 2010 9:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm certainly sensitive to that idea.

I expected to have him higher. He started off much higher on my shortlist but I kept having to slide him down a little. Not wholly comfortable with having him this low to tell you the truth.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Trout

Half a good season doesn’t earn trout a spot on this list for me. Just can’t do it for a guy that young with so little track record. Really, same goes for Santana, Brown and Stanton (and Harper). Three months of good performance (or less) isnt enough for me. Kemp should be higher, IMO. Also don’t like Weiters being below two guys that a year ago he was considered much better then.

Guys you are missing in my opinion;
Snyder (my own favorite underrated player)
Sandoval
A. Jones
Coughlin

by ADLC on Jul 15, 2010 9:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Also

Asdrubel Cabrera.

by ADLC on Jul 15, 2010 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm a big Asdrubal guy...

but I can’t in good conscience put him on this list. He wasn’t hitting much before the injury and his defense is much less impressive than many thought it would be. He is certainly someone who could fly up a list like this with a good second half.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

-Travis Snider was an honorable mention.
-Adam Jones was considered… I don’t know that his glove turned out to be anywhere near as good as advertised. I’m also not confident in his bat getting any better. He’s close to this list though. Might be the best player off it.
-I have not nor did I ever have any faith in Chris Coghlan. He’s a bad fielder and I think what you’re seeing this year is a lot closer to his true talent level.
-I’ve similarly never been a believer in Pablo Sandoval. He’s going to have to move to 1B soon enough. Don’t think his bat is anything special there, though he’s a good hitter. I don’t think we’ll ever see him approach what he did last year, where he ran into a bunch of balls. He’s better than he’s playing right now… but I’d rather have the guys I listed and its not particularly close.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Coghlan

Is a pretty decent fielder in LF, and wasn’t bad as an infielder in the minors. I happen to think hes a lot closer to a .300 hitter then .280 hitter, but defense shouldn’t be a hit on him.

As for Sandoval and Jones, I think you are overrating guys with zero track record over guys who have some proven performance.

I get it though that you are really overrating defense over what I would, so that fine, but I just can’t agree with your selections of all those rookies/minor leaguers

by ADLC on Jul 15, 2010 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look Dude

I made a spelling mistake.. dont be that guy.

by ADLC on Jul 15, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh Coghlan

My bad, Sorry about that, I truly didnt know who you were talking about. Just because we had the whole Steinbrenner thing, doesnt mean I was trying to be an a-hole.

by Yankees10 on Jul 15, 2010 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kemp

Too low. While he has scuffled a bit this year (although his year end #‘s will probably still be pretty good), he has already demonstrated offensive production that is equivalent to Dom Brown’s ceiling for example. Matt Kemp’s “floor” is his 1H-2010 report card, his ceiling is a multiple MVP top 3 finisher. That trumps pretty much anyone still in the minors.

Fat man is no more,
Bursting on through Heaven's Door
Come on in, says Bill

by Wilbur Wood on Jul 16, 2010 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Kemp should be in the top 5 in this kind of list, not all the way down at #14. No way I take Harper, Trout, Rasmus, Posey, Brown or Wieters over him for sure.

by guru4u on Jul 16, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Like I said in the write up

I expected to have him much higher… but I’m not sure he justifies it anymore. He’s had one season where he slugged >.500 and that wasn’t in the last three years and was a shortened season. His defense in CF kind of stinks. So, what is he really? a corner OF who isn’t a good defender and who posts wOBAs around .350. That’s just not that valuable.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

These are good points

But I still dint think they’re enough to place kemp below guys who are still mostly projection. Keep in mind that there’s a healthy chance we have not yet seen kemp’s peak.

I could see a case for rasmus above him, though I’m also wary of his peripherals this year, but not trout and not Harper if he is considered as an OF. I’d have to think more about carlogon, but am wary of that placement too.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 2:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don't want to cop out here...

but its not like a whole lot separates the guys in that part of the list. I certainly understand people taking McCutchen or Kemp over the guys above. Its a very valid position. I think they’re all a) similar; and b) great. I made my choices and I tried to explain my rationale on why… that’s the order I’d take them and I stand by it. I don’t think for a second this is the only reasonable way to rank them… just the choices I made.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not a cop out

and I’m not trying to be pedantic here. I don’t usually get too worked about where player X is ranked in absolute terms. In this case, it’s more philosophical – I think what Kemp has already done is a pretty high bar, it could still go higher, and I doubt any one minor league OF on this list has a > 50% chance of exceeding whatever Kemp’s career ends up being. Someone surely will, but identifying that one…well, odds are not good.

by siddfynch on Jul 17, 2010 3:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Have to disagree

Zimmerman has a higher:

-2010 wOBA
-Career wOBA
-2010 SLG
-Career SLG
-2010 ISO
-Career ISO
-2010 BB rate
-Career BB rate
-2010 K rate (Kemp has a massive 28.6% K rate…)
-Career K rate (…and over a quarter of the time [25.5] for his career…)

The only place where Kemp is appreciably better than Zimmerman is in speed – and Kemp gives back much of the value there with his many caught stealing. Zimmerman is the clearly superior player virtually every way we can measure it.

I think there is a cognitive dissonance between what Matt Kemp actually is and what people think he is. As I admitted above I suffered from the same delusion until I investigated further for this article and was surprised.

Kemp is a very good player… and its not like it would kill your franchise to take him over Zimmerman… all the same I feel it would be a mistake. You’d be giving up value, wins and taking the lesser player of the two.

by alskor on Jul 17, 2010 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Crap. This should be down as a response to guru4 below

I typed it out once with all the numbers and lost it when the browser crashed. I came back to type it again and put it under the wrong post… damn. Long day…

by alskor on Jul 17, 2010 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whew

Glad to see that was a misdirect, cuz I basically agree with you. And with Philly Friar, below, who points out that Zimmerman is underrated. I did some assessments this offseason and realized Zimmerman and Longoria are mighty close. Zimmerman had really slipped under the radar to me until then.

by siddfynch on Jul 17, 2010 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Out of place or not...

…completely agreed. Ryan Zimmerman is still criminally underrated, probably as a result of playing for a team that hasn’t sniffed the playoffs in its D.C. history. But the power has come around, the strike zone discipline is very good, and he provides premium defense (the best in the game, IMO, all due respect to Longoria).

I don’t really think you can fashion an argument for Kemp over Zimmerman. Not that Kemp isn’t a very good player, mind you, but I take Zimmerman 100 times out of 100.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 17, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

100% agreed, Zimmerman is one of my favorite players

The fact that he isn’t mentioned among the game’s elite is truly an omission.

He placed No. 6 on FanGraphs’ trade value series, which seems entirely perfect for a guy that put up 6.6 WAR last season and is actually playing even better this season.

An elite defensive third baseman capable of batting near .300 with a strong walk rate and 30+ home run power.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 18, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

This was my initial serious thought when I saw the list (bumgarner joke aside). I think what kemp did last year is close to the best-case ceilings of these guys in the minors, and kemp already did it in the majors, and well before his traditonal peak years. I think it’s expecting too much of guys like trout to say they’re so likely to surpass where kemp already has been, that we can already rate them higher.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 2:35 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I'm not nearly as high on Kemp after what he's done this season

Not only is he proving to be a major liability in center field, but his base-stealing numbers are pretty awful (15-for-25) and his bat isn’t playing as well this season.

I take Colby Rasmus over Kemp a million times over.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup.

I really expected him to be top 5 when I started… but the more I looked I felt I just couldn’t justify it and he kept dropping. I would typically mention his name fairly quickly if you had asked me the best young players in the game…

He’s still in pretty good company where he is on this list…

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty surprised that people are so bent out of shape with Kemp's placing

There seem to be a lot of pink flags with this guy:

- The awful defensive metrics in 2010
- The ugly SB marks in 2010 (15-for-25)
- The increased K rate and decreased contact rate

He’s hitting for more power, and he’ll certainly benefit from some improvement in his BABIP, but I think that his peak is going to end up being pretty close to what he did in 2009 if he’s continuously regressing as a defender and base-runner.

Just making the top-20 in general seems to be more than enough for Kemp.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

"bent out of shape"

I don’t think this us accurate – I’m seeing a nice conversation regarding a guy that’s still enigmatic while trying to place younger guys with less track record in relation to him.

I fully expect kemp to get slower and slide down the defensive spectrum as he ages. But his hitting arc may still be on the upswing ( the pd is a concern, but is not conclusive yet), and and will be independent of those.

In other words, he’s got a few arrows in his quiver, which spreads out the upside and the risk.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 3:09 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, but I think it's entirely fair to put guys like Rasmus and McCutchen over Kemp

Because those guys are sure-things to stick in center field long-term, and both of them have similar upsides offensively, with McCutchen’s maybe being a little behind the other two.

I mean, I probably wouldn’t put Trout, Brown or Harper in front of Kemp, either. Not yet, at least.

Also, I didn’t mean to insinuate that anyone here was being disrespectful or anything; I was simply making the point that some people seem surprised by Kemp’s low placement, and I don’t really understand that.

I think the real problem isn’t so much that Kemp is too low, but rather that Trout is too high.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we're in agreement

Probably regarding each of these OFs. But where would Carlos Gonzalez be? He’s a bit of an enigma to me too.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 3:21 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think CarGo is a really tough guy to get a grasp on

But if you buy into his bat, which alskor clearly does, then his placement really isn’t too crazy.

He’s a solid defender in center and a plus defender in the corners, and he has the speed to be a 20-25 SB guy. If you buy into the power and believe he’ll improve his K/BB numbers, Gonzalez has the looks of a legitimate star.

I’m not as optimistic as alskor is, but his excitement is understandable.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I heard someone the other day say that CarGo was the next Kemp

And I do think their skill sets are pretty darn similar. But again, I’d rather have the guy that has already done it for more than half a season.

by guru4u on Jul 17, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, I take Kemp over Gonzalez

But I think that it’s a lot closer now than it was in, say, March.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 18, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

This sounds like the argument I was hearing a couple months ago

When I said I would take J Upton over Heyward 100 times out of 100 (to which I was called some names, etc.). I think this argument ignores the tool set, and it ignores production that we have already seen (which I think most would argue is not a fluke).

If you asked me to start a team and told me I had a choice between Kemp and Ryan Zimmerman, I would take Kemp in a heartbeat. Zim’s D is better, but Kemp is better at pretty much every other aspect of the game.

by guru4u on Jul 17, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kemp's better at playing in a bigger market

and for a good team.

Zimmerman’s the better player, you really shouldn’t need to argue that with anyone.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 18, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be hesitant to write off Kemp with such a SSS

Kemp has been a mess this season, but quoting 3+ months of defensive metrics as his declining CF ability is really unfair. He’s had his problems out there it seems, but his whole year has been off. Same with the SB. I’m willing to concede that he may be getting worse in the field and on the bases, but to take a bad 3+ months and use that to write off any improvement (when he’s still 25) seems a bit short sighted. If Kemp puts up similar K rates, SB%, and fielding stats at this time next year, I’ll join you in thinking that 2009 was his peak. Until then, I’ve got to go off his consistant improvement and minor league numbers, and presume that this year is more of a bump in the road.

by Burlin White on Jul 19, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well...

-the defensive metrics I’m looking at aren’t limited to this year. He’s only been in the positive by UZR one year so far. DRS is a little more positive in the past, having him around average, but HATES him this year (an atrocious -17).

-I’m hardly writing him off. I still think he’s one of the better young players in the game and would love to have him on my team

-Many of the guys who are slotted above him profile as not just a little better than Kemp, but as excellent glove men…

I really do like Kemp a lot, though.

by alskor on Jul 19, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Overstatement

I understand the sentiment, but I think both rasmus and kemp are still at a stage in their careers where things could swing substantially in one direction or another (as opposed to say longoria or zimmerman). I think there is still too much unxertianry as to what they could become to say that one is hugely more likely to be way better than the other.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 3:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Whoops... read it quick and thought "SIMON Castro."

I’m somewhat down on him again. Wasn’t a huge fan last year and then really warmed up to him over the offseason. His lack of secondary skills bothers me. I’m not convinced anymore that the power is coming… it still could and I wouldn’t be surprised, but I’m not betting on it at this point. Prospects whose major strength is the hit tool scare me.

In retrospect I think I cut him too early and he should at least have been an honorable mention. Starlin bothers the hell out of me. I should just call him “waffle” because I’m so schizo about this kid. Next week I’ll probably love him again.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

his power isn't coming?

yeah, b/c he’s had such a large sample size.

jesus, some of you. every scout i’ve ever read has said he will be a 15-20 HR guy at least. EVERY. ONE. plus, he’s only 20.

by apoxonbothyourhouses on Jul 19, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, I totally forgot about him when reading this. And I have no excuse, as I’m watching the Phillies/Cubs game right now.

I have to think it was a brain fart from alskor.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 15, 2010 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah... don't know if I'd call it a brain fart...

He wouldn’t be super high on this list. Even when I was high on him I’m not sure I’d slip him in any higher than right above Beckham. Definitely cut him too early and feel now I should have taken a longer look at him. He is only hitting .270/.333/.383 btw.

I’ve never been a gigantic fan, though… on my preseason top 100 he was #56. To be fair I did equivocate then and say in April if I had done a list then he would have been higher…

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

In my mind, the big problem with Castro is that the Cubs rushed him. He was doing quite well for himself in AA and, rather than give Castro a shot at AAA and an opportunity to adapt to higher quality pitching, the Cubs instead decided to throw him to the wolves. It’s worth keeping in mind that he’s only 20 years old and (I believe) is the youngest player in the majors right now. There’s still plenty of projection and growth left in Castro.

It’s worth putting Castro’s season in context, imo. He’s done quite well for himself, considering his age and situation.

by Outshined_One on Jul 15, 2010 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ah...

You’ve got me wavering again.

Good points. Definitely should have been an HM.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s what I meant with the “brain fart” line — that I figured he’d at least be an honorable mention. Then again, I’m a big positional scarcity guy.

To back up Outshined… Castro’s controlling the strike zone reasonably well (9.0% BB, 17.1% K), and the advanced fielding metrics seem to really like him (2.6 UZR, +8 DRS). Pretty impressive for a 20-year old.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 15, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still think Lee pushes him off SS, assuming he can develop. I’ve seen 2-3 guys really push Lee up their lists quickly this year. I just think his tools will force a move, should be interesting to see what happens there though.

by jfish26101 on Jul 15, 2010 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just meant I considered him and f***ed up anyway

I wish I could say I had a brain fart and forgot about him… but I just rushed to judgment on him and forgot to adjust for a few things.

I’m saying more like stupidity on my part than a “brain fart.”

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh, don’t be too hard on yourself, buddy. Like I said, I was watching the Cubs while reading your article and didn’t put 2 and 2 together!

by PhillyFriar on Jul 15, 2010 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks. I'm adding Starlin Castro as an HM

You guys made a solid case and I think you’re right.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good man

I think this is similar to the discussion on Matusz, where gauging a the initial major league performance of a player who’s been aggressively promoted (and thus has scant minor league data for crunching) is treacherous. Castro and Andrus have both been pushed, and I’d say that Andrus has responded by taking a step forward this year, even as we wonder where his power will settle. I won’t be surprised if Castro has a solid second half and takes a similar step forward in 2011. Having seen both these guys I’m pretty darned impressed with their advanced approach, and in Andrus’ case with his work ethic and accountability.

by blackoutyears on Jul 16, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I think that Castro has to be there

Not only is his .280/.341/.405 line solid for a shortstop, but it’s pretty exceptional for a 20-year-old shortstop with 57 games of experience above Single-A.

He’s already a quality defender at shortstop and there are a lot of reasons to believe that he’ll only get better offensively. He’s got the bat speed to show more power than he already’s shown, and I’m pretty impressed by the solid BB/K numbers in the majors so far.

I’m pretty big on Castro, I think he’s going to end up being one of the best shortstops in baseball. That is, unless the Cubs manage to screw him up somehow.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

K:BB

for Castro won me over too. I expected his solid minor league rates to carry over eventually, but so far he’s controlling strikeouts reasonably well while not skipping a beat on drawing walks. The last eight games or so have really helped his slugging as well, as he’s been doubling and tripling. That XBH power is something to watch for in the second half. That and seeing whether or not he wears down. He logged just over 500 PAs in 2009, so hopefully he should be conditioned.

by blackoutyears on Jul 16, 2010 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't get me wrong

He has his share of red flags and potential downsides. However, as a Cubs fan, he’s one of the very few people in the organization who have me feeling optimistic about the future.

Still, thanks for the banter!

by Outshined_One on Jul 15, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

One more question

Where would you put Anthony Rendon on this list?

by Outshined_One on Jul 15, 2010 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good question.

Pre injury I’d say right next to Trout.

Post injury I don’t think he makes it. Have to learn more about severity of the breaks still… but I’m pessimistic.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great stuff here. I can imagine how hard a list this was to compile, and while no one’s going to agree with everything, it certainly passes the sniff test. You’ve explained your reasoning well for some of the more “controversial” choices, too.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 15, 2010 9:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I like it a lot. Joey Votto is 26, otherwise alskor

….lets say Votto was 25 born in september of ’84 and not ’83

where would he rank on this list?

Wow Blackburn makes nearly identical money as Baker does now....

by SteveHoffmanSlowey on Jul 15, 2010 10:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks. Votto would have to be pretty high...

I’d find it hard to leave him out of the top 10, definitely. I’ve always been a big Votto guy. Really tough to place him among the catchers, though. I’m thinking right around Rasmus… and I’d really need to think it over more. Tough call.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Billy Butler has to be there.

I really don’t see how he isn’t. I: don’t think his defensive value is enough.

He should probably be at least #5

by vic1124 on Jul 15, 2010 11:06 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a tough cut...

but he’s a 1B and not even a good 1B defensively. He’s been worth 15.7 runs with bat this year… looking at some of the MLB guys on this list we have Gonzalez 11 runs offensively), (McCutchen (10.2) and Delmon (8.5).

Most of the guys on these list are certainly within shouting distance of Butler offensively. When we look at what those other guys add with the glove compared to the negative value Butler brings in the field… well, I don’t think you could convince me a team would be better off with Butler. Butler would be one of the best hitters on this list… but that’s only half of the game.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with this

Butler is a pretty great hitter, but I have a tough time getting too excited about him when he doesn’t have exceptional walk rates or power numbers, and he offers little to no value with his glove.

He’s a great hitter, but not so great that it offsets his lack of value in every other facet of the game.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doing it in the MLB>doing it in the minors

Butler is doing it for his second season now. His glove is getting better and his power is developing which i think he will probably have the same amount of home runs he did last year if not a few more so maybe 25. Now that isn’t great for a 1B but to not put him on that list compared to your 6-25 is crazy to me IMO.

by vic1124 on Jul 16, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, using that rationale would mean EVERY prospect should be behind every major leaguer.

That’s obviously not right… its just a matter of where we each draw the line. I do really love Butler but he’s not some sort of standout performer as a DH. If he played any other position and even played it below average he would likely make the list.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also, it's worth noting that Butler isn't really a DH

He’s been Kansas City’s everyday 1B all season, with surprisingly solid (and identical) UZR and DRS marks of 0.0, respectively.

I just need to believe that his peak is higher than a .375-.385 wOBA, and I’m not there yet, although I really like his improving BB/K numbers.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 17, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

His power is down in 2010

His isolated power is down from .191 to .159, and ZiPS projects him to finish with 45 doubles and 18 homers after hitting 51 doubles and 21 homers last season, albeit with a lower batting average and less walks.

It’s just that there are numerous guys hitting just as well as Butler that do offer valuable defense and do run the bases well. I think he’s worth mentioning, and you could probably convince a lot of people to put him in the top-25, but his omission here is pretty understandable if you’re not expecting him to get much better from here.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 17, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Potentially, sure. But Butler’s a far safer bet, and I feel pretty confident we haven’t seen his upside yet. I’m risk averse, so given the choice between the two, I’m taking Butler.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 19, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carlos Gonzalez

He has some serious Home/Road splits…I dunno if i’d put him in the top 10

Home: .359/.399/.653
Road: .266/.287/.405

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 15, 2010 11:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Its definitely a concern

and I looked at it. If I thought his batting line (.314/.346/.532) were his true talent level he’d be closer to #1 on this list.

He’s still hit 19.4% line drives on the road and played some pretty decent defense in CF. Then again, I was always high on him as a prospect… and I’m assuming at age 24 he continues to get better as a hitter and refine his approach some.

by alskor on Jul 15, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I definitely think he'll improve (which is scary)

Though I think I’d take McCutchen over CarGo, but that’s just my opinion

Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster

by Gobroks on Jul 15, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a really tough call

McCutchen has much better plate discipline, but I don’t think his bat is nearly as potent. I’m not sure which I’d rather have.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 16, 2010 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think I'd take McCutchen

I like CarGo a lot, and there’s probably a little more upside there, but I worry about his bat.

His contact and whiff rates aren’t too good, and his exceptionally aggressive approach at the plate has manifested itself with a 4.6% walk rate.

I like McCutchen’s 40/59 BB/K a whole lot more than CarGo’s 16/76 BB/K.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

A 19-year old doing great things in A ball doesn’t rank higher than Andrew McCutchen right now. He’s a superstar in the making.

by Woo! on Jul 16, 2010 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

yep

This is a classic overrating young prospect list, underrating the guys who have had time to show a flaw or two.

by scooter on Jul 16, 2010 6:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

That was my feeling

Something needs to be said for track records.

by ADLC on Jul 16, 2010 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am also hesitant for most Angel's hitting prospects

Kendrick, Kotchman, Wood, McPherson all failed to live up to the hype for various reasons. They just seem to have VERY hitter friendly parks.

by King Billy Royal on Jul 16, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure that 100's of players play in that league and many have played that park and none have done what Mike Trout did.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not defending the super love of Trout or anything like that, but its unfair to compare those hitters to him. I don’t know a lot about the history of the Angels minor league teams, park dimensions and all that, but I can’t find anything that shows me that any of the four players you mentioned ever played in Cedar Rapids. And for example, Kotchman never put up great numbers – he was always a bag of “potential”

by Kenneth Arthur on Jul 16, 2010 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

And, just to add, none of those guys had Trout’s tools. People might be getting a bit carried away with Trout, but it’s easy to do so when you see tools and performance mesh in one package.

by PhillyFriar on Jul 16, 2010 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brandon Wood K’s a lot, but he have great tools

by LCT on Jul 16, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not down on Trout

But putting him ahead of guys like Kemp, Bruce, and McCutcheon just seems way too high for a guy who hasn’t sniffed AA yet.

by King Billy Royal on Jul 16, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

My only concern is that his stat line is inflated by average...

Kotchman had a 834 OPS.
Kendrick had a 976 OPS.
Wood had a 726 OPS.
McPherson had a 808.

Kendrick stat line resembles Trout the most, although Trout’s walk rate was much much better, and his speed is better, while Kendrick was showing more power and more XBH. Trout is also much young than Kendrick was at the same level.

But, the same yellow flag that should have applied to Kendrick then, should now apply to Trout, in that they both hit 360+ in the league, which made their stat lines look much better.

Poster formerly known as artie

by beastball on Jul 16, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely...

There are differences, for sure, and Trout is definitely a better prospect at the same stage of development than Kendrick was. However, Kendrick’s is just one example where diving a little deeper into performance can reveal problems that make the possible performance drop less disappointing.

Anyway, Trout will be an interesting study to see if these high average fueled stat lines are a problem or not.

Poster formerly known as artie

by beastball on Jul 17, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

-I don’t think the average is a fluke, though. He’s been killing the ball. There’s a reason he has a high BABIP and its not luck on BIP. Scouting supports this.

-I also don’t think his OBP is a fluke. He’s walking a more than healthy amount of the time(12.6%) and has an excellent approach at the plate. BB:K ration of 46:53. Scouts like his approach a lot.

-Nor do I think the SLG is a fluke. ISO of .165 (Teenager in the Midwest League). Lacing the ball all over the place and his swing hints at much more power to come. Again, scouting supports this, too.

-If we (for the hell of it) adjust his AVG down pessimistically calling it luck… well, his line would still be off the charts for a teenager in the midwest league.

-Oh and he’s a plus defensive CFer. And the 44 stolen bases.

Trout is just THAT good. I think a year from now this will be immediately obvious to everyone. If I’m wrong so be it. It won’t be the first time and it won’t be the last…. I’ll take my lumps and admit I was wrong if that’s what happens. Right now, I like this kid enough to stick my head that far out here. He’s absolutely filthy. I think he’s going to be extremely fun to watch… and very valuable in all facets of the game. I think he’s a franchise cornerstone kind of guy.

by alskor on Jul 17, 2010 3:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand the logic...

and I probably come off more pessimistic than I really am. I like Trout as a player and a prospect. That said, I think he’s getting over-hyped right now. And this is probably an “agree to disagree” thing, and we’ll just have to wait and see. That said….

I’m not doubting any part of his game except his average, and the more of that he loses, the less impressive he looks and the drop off is quick. Kendrick is the best, latest example of how high average can hide problems. Kendrick’s line looks great when he’s hitting 340-360, but when he’s hitting 300, it doesn’t look so great. Trout has more to fall back on than Kendrick with walks and speed, which is why I like him better than Kendrick at the same stage.

And, something a little unrelated, but perhaps revealing, was the BP comp for Trout being Damon, and if you look at it, statistically speaking, that comp seems pretty good. Damon landed in the top 10 after his high A season, and was in the majors the next year. Trout could follow that same path and could post similar numbers in the majors.

But listing Trout that high over people like Stanton or Kemp doesn’t seem justified. It seems to be more of a reaction to Stanton’s first run in the majors and Kemp’s recent struggles than anything. If Stanton were still posting 1.200+ OPS in AA/AAA as a 20 year old with 80 power, or Kemp was still posting a 900 OPS in the majors, I’m not sure there could be an argument to place Trout higher than either of them, and maybe others.

But, it’ll be fun to wait and see!

Anyway, I’m more interested in Trout for the very reason that his stat line, and ranking seems to be boosted by a high average. There’s been several prospects in the past that also were treated that way, and I just want to see if there’s anything to it.

Poster formerly known as artie

by beastball on Jul 17, 2010 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Walk rate

Have you checked Kendrick’s in the minors? No comparison. Let’s see what Trout does as he moves up, but so far there’s no basis for comparing the relationship between his avg and OBP and Kendrick’s, which has been completely avg -driven his entire career. Trout’s on-base was almost 100 points higher than his avg at Cedar Rapids. He has a 12.1% walk rate in his minor league career if I’m not mistaken. At this point they do not seem like comparable players at all.

by blackoutyears on Jul 20, 2010 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

There is a comparison...

I conceded that Trout has better walk rates and speed, but the point is that his surface stats are impressive while hitting 360, just like Kendrick, and if he were hitting 320, then it would be far less impressive. And if he were hitting 320 with a sub 900 OPS I doubt we would still be talking about him as a top 5 prospect?

Poster formerly known as artie

by beastball on Jul 20, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I still would.

I never use OPS anyway, but he’s an excellent defensive CF with great speed and a projection for much more power. Scouts adore him and he’s been hitting the ball hard to all corners of the ballpark. This isn’t a high BABIP fueled mirage.

by alskor on Jul 20, 2010 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Beastball, you’re missing the point. Kendrick has to hit .330 to put up a .360 on-base. Trout, as it stands now, probably still posts an on-base of .400+ if he hits .320, so no, the comparison is poor. Trout has far more plate discipline that Kendrick has ever shown. There’s a difference between an OBP that’s almost completely avg-driven, as Kendrick’s has historically been, and one that is a result of both strong avg and a robust walk rate as is currently the case with Trout. The guy who walks stands a much better chance of providing value even when he’s not hitting for avg.

by blackoutyears on Jul 20, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh and thanks for posting the list!

I appreciate the work it takes to build the list, and the patience it takes to debate your decisions.

Poster formerly known as artie

by beastball on Jul 17, 2010 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

By this rationale I should rank every major leaguer over every prospect.

I explain this more in my intro on the full article… obviously that would be a less than optimal outcome.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats a fair argument though

If you are listing the top 20 players under 25 I am hard pressed to put most minor leaguers on there. They arent the top 20 players AT THIS TIME. They may have the talent to eventually get there, they may have a ceiling that high, but they aren’t top 20 players right now.

by ADLC on Jul 16, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then we'll have to just disagree on that point.

I think that’s a shortsighted view that can look really bad in even a few months.

As I said in the intro, this is about predicting what will happen. If you want to see what has already happened you can easily check the fangraphs leaderboards.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think

Picking a bunch of unproven players as the top 20 under 25 is far more likely to look foolish. Again, I like your list as far as potential goes, but to call them the Top 20 in that age range is just putting the cart before the horse.

by ADLC on Jul 17, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

You didn't make it easy on yourself

mixing major and minor leaguers! You’ve got a strong constitution. I’m tentatively in the camp that lobbies for Billy Butler. I know that in the Age of WAR that his defense dings him, but I think he’s an already good hitter with a chance to be excellent. He’s basically replicated last year’s performance while signficantly reducing his strikeouts. I don’t have to tell you that historically that’s one of the clearest indicators of an impact hitter.

by blackoutyears on Jul 16, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Don't you worry about the relative lack of walks and power?

I’d like to see more than a .161 ISO and 10% walk rate from my first baseman if he’s supposedly an elite-level player.

The guy has to bat like .330 or he’s only a decent everyday first baseman.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do to some degree

but I’m looking at a guy who’s putting up on-base percentages of .363 last season and .389 this year while not walking more than he does, and he may well be a credible batting title contender on an annual basis for the henxt few years. I’m with you because I generally want the higher walk rate, but if the player makes enough contact, displayed especially in his decreasing strikeouts, then I start treating him as outside the box a bit. You have to give him some credit for increasing his walk rate while cutting the strikeouts.

The over-the-fence power is the question for me, but considering his other skills and his age, I think he has a shot to add five to ten more homers in his prime. At this point he’s not entirely unlike Sean Casey for me as a hitter, though here’s hoping he ages better than The Mayor did. I understand the expectations for 1B are high, but I’m not entirely willing to let positional expectations throw the baby out with the bathwater.

by blackoutyears on Jul 16, 2010 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, for sure

And I like the Casey comp, that’s exactly the kind of thing that I worry about.

Guys like Sean Casey, who don’t have big power or walk numbers for a 1B, really peak with WAR marks in the 4-5 range. And if I’m talking about the 20 best young players in baseball, I wanna see a guy with higher peak potential.

Butler can definitely be better than Casey, but I’ll hold off on my hopes for him as an elite 1B until he up his walk rate into the 12-13% range or shows more power than he has so far.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 17, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think

you’re overrating the number of these guys who are going to pay off. How many more highly touted colleagues did Casey surpass in his career? That said, he’s one possible outcome for Butler. I expect Butler may well be consistently better. We’re not talking Lyle Overbay here.

And Casey’s walk numbers are very good in light of his extremely low strikeout rate. His contact ability was way above average. ~8.50% walks, but 10.2% whiff rate. No, his value in his 20s was more than solid, and he was a reasonable defender.

by blackoutyears on Jul 20, 2010 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

The only player that I would make a hard case for to be in the top 20 would be Elvis Andrus.

And understand that’s coming from the biggest Dustin Ackley fan here. He’s not even 22 yet and he’s already proven to be a 3-win player. Gordon Beckham is 23 and he’s been worth 2 wins total in 181 games.

by Kenneth Arthur on Jul 16, 2010 12:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Andrus

(response to below, too).

Yes, he exploded onto the scene as a fairly valuable player. I think it would be a mistake to assume he keeps getting better linearly. Where can he really improve his game? I have a real hard time thinking his patience or power will improve that significantly. I expect them to get a little better… how much better can we reasonably expect them to get? I don’t want to go so far as to say he’s maxed out his potential by any means… but I’m just not confident that he’s going to improve that much.

He’s in pretty rare company where I’ve placed him… I don’t think its a slight. He’s a very good player.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just think, when you're a 3 WAR player at age 20, the margin for improvement doesn't have to be that great.

But when you’re a 2 WAR player at age 22, like Beckham was last year, the margin to get better is greater and you have less time to do it.

Andrus doesn’t have to improve his defense one bit to be a valuable player for the next 10 years. I can’t imagine that his offense would slip that much either. Even with his flaws he was a 3 WAR player. When Beckham was near his peak capabilities as a rookie, he wasn’t close to that good. That’s the difference for me.

by Kenneth Arthur on Jul 16, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its a fair point.

…but I do expect Beckham to make that leap and I don’t see Andrus improving a whole lot. Also, Andrus had to get a little lucky with the bat to reach the 3 win plateau.

& Beckham was extremely rushed to the majors, fwiw.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Elvis Andrus

I belive Andrus should have been one of the top 20. Jason Heyward and Elvis Andrus became the 41st and 42nd players to become all-stars at the age of 21 or younger.

Here is some research Adam Morris did about Andrus’s 2009 season:

Elvis had an OPS+ of 82 last season. Well below average, to be sure.

However, it was the 8th best OPS+ for any 20 year old (or younger) major leaguer playing at least 100 games at shortstop.

Only 9 players have posted an OPS+ of at least 70 (which sets the bar fairly low) while playing at least 100 games at shortstop in his age 20 (or younger) season.

Robin Yount did it 3 times. He’s in the Hall of Fame.

Edgar Renteria did it twice. He’s a five time All Star.

Alex Rodriguez did it. He’s the second best shortstop of all time, and will be in the Hall of Fame.

Arky Vaughan did it. He’s in the Hall of Fame, and probably the third or fourth best shortstop of all time.

Alan Trammel did it. He’s not in the Hall of Fame, but he should be.

Travis Jackson did it. He’s in the Hall of Fame, although he probably shouldn’t be. But he was a damn good player.

Cass Michael did it in 1945, when the majors were so decimated by WWII that a one-armed outfielder got regular playing time.

Whitey Witt did it in 1916.

And Elvis Andrus did it.

by Tex2044 on Jul 16, 2010 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

more from Adam Morris

Elvis is still on pace to walk about 80 times this year. If he makes it to 80 walks, below is the company he will be in. Add this to his outstanding defense.

Here is the complete list of players who have walked at least 80 times at age 21 or younger:

Ted Williams (twice)

Mel Ott (twice)

Al Kaline

Joe Morgan

Rickey Henderson

Eddie Mathews

Jimmie Foxx

Harlond Clift

Donie Bush

Curt Blefary

Ed Yost

by Tex2044 on Jul 16, 2010 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting perspectives

But, that filter of 100 games at SS at age 20 seems like it would leave very few players. Did the article you quote relay how large this pool was? If Andrus is 9th in a pool of only 15, sitting “9th all time” is not as impressive.

Would also be interesting to see how many names on that list of 100 at age 20 are memorable players.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 2:28 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Agreed that Andrus' omission is a bit surprising.

A 21-year-old shortstop that plays plus defense, has very good contact skills and a walk rate over 11% sounds like a pretty exciting player to me.

Maybe I give him a little too much credit for the OBP/defense combination, and the lack of power could become an issue at some point in the future, but I think that Andrus is on pace to become the best shortstop in the AL pretty soon.

I like baseball.
I write for Beyond the Box Score and The Hardball Times Fantasy

by Satchel Price on Jul 16, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Understood

And I’m saying I’m curious to see who these were. And if there were 9 of them, that adds some context to the “top 9” rhetoric.

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 3:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Eh

I was referring to a list of all ss that had played those 100 g at age 20, but was also thinking ahead to a follow up assessment. For the item at hand, I understand andrus’ showing puts him in rare company, most if which has been all-star caliber

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 7:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Eh

I was referring to a list of all ss that had played those 100 g at age 20, but was also thinking ahead to a follow up assessment. For the item at hand, I understand andrus’ showing puts him in rare company, most if which has been all-star caliber

by siddfynch on Jul 16, 2010 7:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Broken link?

Am I the only one getting a 404 error message with the link? Also tried loading Bullpen Banter directly but can’t find the article.

Really curious to read the whole thing.

by FI2 on Jul 16, 2010 12:58 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Same here

"The A's have to be setting some record this year for simultaneously maximizing team quality and player anonymity. I guess that’s sort of their thing though." - Luke in MN

by hero66 on Jul 16, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Same

It’s annoying, because I can’t manually find the article on their site either. Ditto with the search tool on their site.

by RM on Jul 16, 2010 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seems to work for me

but my brother told me the same thing.

For some reason if you own a login and go to the site without logging in it seems to get stuck on the old cached version, showing one story before last at the top. Login and refresh and it updates. I’ve been thinking its a firefox issue… I’ll talk to the guys about it though, thanks.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here’s my list. What’s yours?

1. Evan Longoria
2. Justin Upton
3. Jason Heyward
4. Troy Tulowitzki
5. Ryan Zimmerman
6. Carlos Santana
7. Colby Rasmus
8. Domonic Brown
9. Andrew McCutchen
10. Buster Posey
11. Carlos Gonzalez
12. Matt Kemp
13. Bryce Harper
14. Anthony Rendon
15. Adam Jones
16. Mike Trout
17. Mike Stanton
18. Elvis Andrus
19. Pedro Alvarez
20. Matt Wieters

by Adam Reynolds on Jul 16, 2010 6:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Just ran a report from my database:

Name Last Name , POS , TEAM
1 Justin Upton , RF , ARI
2 Evan Longoria , 3B , TB
3 Troy Tulowitzki , SS , COL
4 Andrew McCutchen , CF , PIT
5 Jason Heyward , RF , ATL
6 Jesus Montero , C , NYY
7 Elvis Andrus , SS , TEX
8 Carlos Gonzalez , LF , COL
9 Billy Butler , 1B , KC
10 Michael Stanton , RF , FLA
11 Pablo Sandoval , 3B , SF
12 Adam Jones , CF , BAL
13 Ian Stewart , 3B , COL
14 Domonic Brown , CF , PHI
15 Jay Bruce , RF , CIN
16 Asdrubal Cabrera , SS , CLE
17 Colby Rasmus , CF , STL
18 Dexter Fowler , CF , COL
19 Desmond Jennings , CF , TB
20 Dustin Ackley , 2B , SEA
21 Justin Smoak , 1B , SEA
22 Gordon Beckham , 3B , CHW
23 Mike Trout , CF , LAA
24 Carlos Santana , C , CLE
25 Mike Moustakas , 3B , KC
26 Buster Posey , C , SF
27 Fernando Martinez , LF , NYM
28 Travis Snider , LF , TOR
29 Delmon Young , LF , MIN
30 Chris Carter , 1B , OAK

Haper would right behind Smoak, Rendon would be right ahead of Harper. I would also put Austin Maddox after Posey if I were counting unsigned players.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 16, 2010 6:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Alvarez was 31

Blanks was 32.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 16, 2010 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Carter over Alvarez...

Really? Do you mind explaining?

ETHAN MARTIN!!!!

by joegonzo on Jul 16, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better

bb rating, speed rating, power rating and contact rate at a higher level. I’m sure he will be higher than Carter at the end of the year.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 17, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maddox

Talk about mixed signals. Excellent power, but the K:BB is woof, even for a frosh. He has major improvements to make before there’s any reason to think his other numbers will translate. Of all the college players out there, why does your database rate Maddox that high in particular?

by blackoutyears on Jul 16, 2010 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I wouldn't put Maddox that high

He’s first base bound and he needs serious work on his K/BB.

by Jeff Reese on Jul 16, 2010 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just put the top hitters from

the 2010, 2011 and 2012 draft in there for the hell of it.

I am very confident in Maddox and that’s why he’s #1 for the 2012 draft for me.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 16, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really

I think jar said it as I would almost word for word. It really is rare for a college guy with those walk and whiff rates to thrive as a pro. Never say never, but when you factor in that he’s almost certainly a 1B for scouts already, it’s hard to see him as 1-1 in a draft. 2012 is a ways off, and he could make the leap, but he could just easily go all Victor Sanchez too.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Diekroeger or Brian Goodwin were ahead of Maddox as juniors, and I like Brian Johnson as a hitter more than as a pitcher (Brett Eibner caliber at both probably) and I think he’s going to be buzzing by then. A freshman who really popped up in the post-season for me was Max White of Oklahoma. He looks like a total galoot on first glance because he’s hulking and long-waisted, but he has a good swing that should get better and he’s more athletic than he looks.

by blackoutyears on Jul 16, 2010 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I'd definitely put Goodwin and Diekroeger ahead of Maddox

IF Maddox continues to mash, he’ll probably go in the middle of the first round, but I’m not sure if he can get higher than that. There’s a good bit of talent in that 2012 college class and the HS class sounds solid too from the little I’ve read (McCullers being the favorite for 1.1 I think).

by Jeff Reese on Jul 17, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can see that

I’ve heard good things about McCullers but he’s a short righty, so you never know. I haven’t seen White but I’ve heard good things.
I have seen Maddox hit about 20 times or so and he never hits the ball weakly. He probably will end up at 1st but I think this guy is a hell of a lot better than Victor Sanchez.
Considering a guy like Josh Sale fell to #17 this year means you guys are more than likely right, but I still love his bat more than anyone else in that class.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 17, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

McCullers

may end up a position player yet. Strong bat and a plus INF arm. I didn’t think he was that short when I saw him — PG has him at 6’2" FWIW, and he looks at least 6’0" on video — and he’s well put together and hasn’t started his junior year, so he may grow. Great projectability there.

Sanchez is just a cautionary name when assessing college freshmen with top power and poor walk rates. The walk rate is a bright red flag with college guys. Maddox has two years to turn it around. And I think most would say that Sale is a more polished bat than Maddox. Maddox was known to have big holes in his swing as a high schooler and scouts were really split on him. Sale was considered by many to be the best h.s. hitter in this draft. Different profiles.

by blackoutyears on Jul 20, 2010 1:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not a Justin Smoak fan?

Sorry if that’s in the full article. I can’t seem to get that to come up.

Fans are typically idiots.

by The Typical Idiot Fan on Jul 16, 2010 8:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm actually a HUGE Smoak fan

Paid out the ass for him in my favorite fantasy league. No way am I confident placing him high on this list. Being a 1B really hurts a guy’s value. Like I said above… Billy Butler only made HM… its tough.

Smoak would be in the group just below the HMs right now… he definitely has some upside there, but his platoon problems bother me. I think he’s going to be excellent, but right now I can’t justify him making this list.

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

since you mentioned platoon splits

what about Upton? isn’t he pretty much an extreme splits guy two? Nobody really talks about it with him, but he’s pretty much a 800 OPS guy vs rhp. . . last year around a 400 pt split differential

by SoCalSoxFan on Jul 18, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Its a good point...

but:

-Smoak is a 1B while Upton is a very good defensive RF. I need a 1B to mash – and every potential hole in a 1B’s offensive game is magnified… whereas Upton gets the benefit of the doubt because of the rest of his game to some degree.

-Upton doesn’t have as big a split this year at all. For his career its not huge.

-Upton hits both LHP & RHP well… Its not like he struggles against RHPs… he just flat out destroys LHPs. Its not like his .277/.333/.447 last year vs. RHP was a bad line.

-Contrast to Smoak, who shouldn’t have an issue since he’s a switch hitter… but has had problems so far (SSS) and its bothers me a little. Also, I believe KG or maybe Frankie Pilliere had a quote saying scouts were down on his swing as a RHH recently… lack of confidence from that side or something of that sort. Can’t seem to find it. I’ll take another look.

-There are plenty of elite, valuable players with platoon splits… so its not the end of the world anyway.

-I’m not terribly concerned that Smoak will have a long term platoon problem… but its definitely a data point against him for now that just bumps him off the bottom of the list. I remain very high on him and my man crush on him is going strong the last couple days! Just hard for a guy like Smoak to make headway against all these guys who play plus defense in the OF and hit like we think 1B should hit. This a pretty exciting crop of young players we have around the game right now.

by alskor on Jul 18, 2010 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

upton

definitely has huge all around value, but i don’t recall anyone ever bringing up that he’s “just” an 800-820 OPS guy vs rhp.

I know if I’m building a team, I’d love an Upton, but I’d prefer a bunch of lefty or switch hitting studs (not easy to build a team like that).

by SoCalSoxFan on Jul 18, 2010 1:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

About “confidence issues” on the original poster’s list…under Matt Wieters at #10, you note that his subpar .298 wOBA this year is due to confidence issues of never having faced adversity before in baseball. Similarly, the same is said about Gordon Beckham’s .270 wOBA.

A bit further down, for Andrew McCutchen, you simply note that his .357 wOBA is short of expectations, and I agree. He posted a .368 mark in almost 500 plate appearances last year. A lot of the lowering of this year’s mark is in the month of July, as he has had a slump for a little bit. How do we know he isn’t suffering from confidence issues from facing adversity this year? How do we spot simple crises of confidence from legitimately doing badly?

by Adam Reynolds on Jul 16, 2010 10:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Its certainly possible.

Look, I really like McCutchen. His ranking wasn’t as much about his bat as it was about his glove. Most of the other similar players on the list are exceptional defenders. I think McCutchen is a subpar defender despite his speed and that hurts him a lot.

… and its not like he’s hitting poorly or anything. I typically don’t look that much at traditional stat lines… focus a lot on K rate, BB rate, ISO, stuff like that… McCutchen looked pretty good on all those counts… but I do have to admit I’m not sure how much better he will hit than this.

Beckham and Wieters… they are really struggling. I think they’re significantly better than they’ve shown. Hard for me to believe that even if McCutchen is also suffering from confidence issues that he can be anywhere near as much better than his line as Beckham and Wieters could be. There just isn’t the wiggle room there.

My main point here on Beckham and Wieters is that they never struggled in the minors, though. McCutchen did. Wieters and Beckham were both fasttracked and this is the first slump they’ve had since… what? high school? little league? Follow me…?

by alskor on Jul 16, 2010 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that a -5.1 UZR in 1700 innings is a concern, but we need more data than just over a season for that number to have much predictive value. If he put up defensive numbers like Kemp’s at this stage, I’d be more concerned. I think Cutch has the athleticism to get better with experience in the next couple of years.

McCutchen stacks up well in the peripheral stats of ISO/BB/K, as he’s been first in ISO and BB rate of the trio, and second in K rate. I agree that McCutchen won’t improve as much as the other two, but he was a stone’s throw away from a .380 wOBA in his rookie season. Just a little bit of power just due to age would get him to at least that mark regularly.

Wieters and Beckham project to be quality players, but confidence issues can only really cover so much when this many at bats are on the ledger.

Wieters has 683 PAs at the big league level already, and Beckham has 738. The result is 92 and 90 wRC+ in more than a full season’s worth of work.

Beckham and Wieters will improve, and they have tools out the wazoo. But it’s hard to fully separate the MLB production at almost 800 at bats when one toolsy top prospect is producing and the other two have scuffed in a reasonable sample size.

With offensive numbers being more reliable than defense, this is more of a consideration than Cutch’s defense. Beck/Wieters are going to get stronger, but .380 wOBA is a much steeper climb from .316 than it is from .363.

That’s just my take, and I respect disagreement.

by Adam Reynolds on Jul 17, 2010 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for doing this

I really think this is what prospecting should be about, moreso than what prospecting sites really do. It’s not like a player’s development just stops when he reaches the majors, he’s just developing at a higher level. Players reach the majors at different ages not necessarily due to merit but because of different situations for different teams, so it seems odd to me that they lose their prospect status because of something as arbitrary as major league time when in reality they are still just as much of a prospect as some guy still performing in AAA.

Anyway, I like the list, wish I had more time to critique it but I’m out of town so I can’t think about it too much until I get back early next week.

by oplaid on Jul 17, 2010 1:36 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree

this is something I am trying to do at my site. I don’t even want to cut it off at 25, I am trying to be able to compare the value of a player in the minors against a major leaguer, not just under 25 guys.
I’ve put in tons of work and haven’t rolled much of it out yet but it isn’t too far off. My list I posted is just one thing. I want to be able to put out a report on whatever someone wants.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 17, 2010 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

do you have a glossary for your PDF?

Vision?
trade value? some of the guys seem to have similar trade value numbers, but seem to have vastly different prospect status.

by SoCalSoxFan on Jul 18, 2010 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

vision is basically bb rate

The trade value is something I just started working on and I see a lot of flaws in it. Each player has 3 trade values and they can be vastly different depending on what the emphasis is, young players or major league ready guys.
Jurickson Profar is a guy who the Rangers would value a lot and his value is less than Jeremy Jeffress. That is just silly, but I will work it out.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 18, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its a very interesting concept.

I’m just skeptical a numbers only based can arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. These are prospects and scouting reports are, IMHO, a good bit more important that results/numbers/stats. These are young men who are often inconsistent… and are still developing their game and advancing by leaps and bounds – rarely in a linear pattern. The prospect who gets slightly better results at each level with no bumps in the road is the rare exception. Judging these prospects wholly on results or even specific markers within their results is like looking at less than half the picture. Rankings of prospects based mostly on results/stats/numbers are a very effective way of measuring what a guy has done already (which does have its uses)… but I have serious reservations about using numbers in the absence of scouting to try to predict what a guy will do in the future. & I am as stats oriented a guy as you will find. Full blown Bill James fan.

I’m not saying endeavors like yours aren’t worthwhile – we can certainly learn important things from them… I just caution everyone that the story doesn’t end there.

by alskor on Jul 18, 2010 1:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

When I started this, I thought I could just have a formula using just numbers and no scouting information but I couldn’t.
The current iteration I have has a floor and a ceiling rating, based on my opinions and things I have heard and read. There are very few players in the minors that I don’t know a little about. If I don’t, I search until I find something.
It is not as simple as I thought it would be when I started but this seems to work. With just my formula, it gets some unusual results. Guys like Mike Baxter and Erik Komatsu are very high there and shouldn’t be, but it catches guys like Brandon Laird who many people don’t know about.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 18, 2010 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I really appreciate the nice comments from everyone.

I fear you all may be less forgiving when I release my rankings of the pitchers. This one was excruciating to do and I’m still not happy with it. There are a tremendous amount of good young pitchers in the game right now and they all have strong elements that recommend them. There just really isn’t much that separates most of them. Plus… so much of the young pitchers is projection for the future… and that’s a lot of opinion, so its absolutely guaranteed to result in disagreement. Opinions on stuff, opinions on potential, even opinions on severity of injuries w/ regards to the future. The people who have problems with projecting young position prospects over successful MLB position players will be absolutely mortified by some of the pitcher rankings, I’m sure. It was never my intention to be strictly objective here… as I don’t think that is the best way to make a list. Be forewarned that the ranking of pitchers is far more subjective than the position players. The ground we walk on is far less solid and there are far less numbers to support my positions. I’m already annoyed by how the article came out, to tell you the truth. I keep rewriting it, trying to explain my decision further. There is no way to please everyone (nor would that be my goal)… but do bear in mind I abhor people who take controversial standpoints they don’t support in order to gain (negative) attention. I absolutely never do that. I hate reading things like that and I respect the people who read my stuff too much to bullshit them like that.

Back to the point though… really appreciate the comments, thank you all for the feedback and for checking out the site. Its a labor of love for all of us and we deeply thank you for taking the time to check it out. We also respect your opinions a great deal so I’m very happy that this post generated so many comments (even if they weren’t all particularly happy with me!)

Thanks,
Al Skorupa (alskor)

by alskor on Jul 18, 2010 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great Job!

I look forward to the pitchers. Pitchers are volatile and can change quickly. Rick Porcello had sky high stock last year and has dropped a lot this year, but he still has the same potential. Where do you put Joba? Based on his potential elite bullpen arm or the hittable version that we have seen.
Pitchers can go so many ways so quickly and are very tough to nail down. As long as you have a reason for your decision, it is a respectable one.

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 18, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pitching

is going to be scary. I completely agree that there are a lot of compelling young arms and that restricting yourself to U25 guys means that, by definition, you’re ranking them at their most volatile. Good luck!

by blackoutyears on Jul 20, 2010 1:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

You aren't kidding.

Here’s a shortlist I worked from:

Strasburg
A. Vizcaino
B. Anderson
Billingsley
Britton
Buchholz
C. Withrow
Cahill
Cain
Chapman
Cosart
Cueto
Danks
Drabek
F.Hernandez
Feliz
Friedrich
G. Gonzalez
Gallardo
Gibson
Hanson
Hellickson
Holland
Hudson
Hughes
Kelly
Kershaw
Lamb
Latos
Lyles
M. Perez
Masterson
Matusz
Matzek
Medlen
Montgomery
Parker
Pineda
Price
R. Delgado
Romero
S. Miller
Scheppers
Si. Castro
Teheran
Turner

Nightmare. I’m 100% sure I’m going to get killed no matter how I rank them. Everyone sees the perfect projection in their own pitchers… I’m a little scared!

by alskor on Jul 20, 2010 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be willing

to post mine and get tore up if it would make you fell better :)

http://milbprospects.blogspot.com/

by Matt Garrioch on Jul 20, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ha!

Misery loves company. It’s all in fun, and I think far more people appreciate it than will pillage you. There have been some really good debates on here as a result of the hitter list.

That list is daunting. Holy crap.

by blackoutyears on Jul 20, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

by all means!

If you flank them it will prevent the snipers from setting up a kill zone at least!

…and obviously, I’d like to see your opinion, as well…

by alskor on Jul 20, 2010 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s not like a player’s development just stops when he reaches the majors, he’s just developing at a higher level.

Unless you’re McCutchen, apparently. :)

by Adam Reynolds on Jul 19, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ha.

I really do like McCutchen. He could easily have been higher…

…its not like he made my list of “20 Worst Positon Players Age 25 & Under…”

by alskor on Jul 19, 2010 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jay Bruce

Overall, I like the list except for the placement of McCutchen (already discussed ad nauseum) & Bruce. I love Bruce’s power potential and he is a plus defensive RF, but his offensive performance to date has been a little disappointing. In fact, he’s walking less, striking out more, and hitting for less power in 2010 than he did in 2009.

He’s probably still a top 20 guy for me based on sheer talent, but I’m not sure how at this point how he can be rated above McCutchen based on MLB performance.

Thanks for putting this together.. it’s definitely interesting to think about.

by jc3 on Jul 18, 2010 12:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, put McCutchen in RF and he's virtually the same defender Bruce is, maybe a little worse

If we assume the positional adjustment for CF→RF is correct (and we should). If you asked me to peg it right now I’d say Cutch is around a -3 CF and Bruce at least around a +5 RF (with a case to be made for higher). Obviously its early in both their careers and that could change… but I prefer Bruce’s glove. McCutchen just doesn’t get good reads or jumps and I’m skeptical how much he can improve that… he’s already using his speed to make up for it as much as possible… and its not like he’s going to get faster.

As for the bats, I’ll take Bruce. Obviously there is some projection in that… but I think you all see where I’m coming from there. I wouldn’t blame anyone for taking McCutchen here… he’s certainly been a hitter so far… as I’ve said, this isn’t about the past but about predicting the future, otherwise I could have just cut and pasted a leaderboard from fangraphs and moved on. My preference is Bruce going forward.

I’m not sure how at this point how he can be rated above McCutchen based on MLB performance.

None of this is based wholly on performance to date. Performance to date has strong predictive value, of course, but more goes into the projection aspect than that.

McCutchen is one of the most controversial players on this list… and I expected that. If I was confident he was a +5 CF defensively he would probably be right above or below CarGo and top 5ish. I’m worried about McCutchen’s defense and I’m not sure how much better he’s going to hit. Even with that, he is really good right now and a good portion of this is me predicting other guys getting better around him.

I love Bruce’s power potential and he is a plus defensive RF, but his offensive performance to date has been a little disappointing

He is posting a career high wOBA in 2010. This is his best offensive season so far.

RJ Anderson came out with a great article on Bruce yesterday:

This is Jay Bruce’s third big league season. He improved from year one to year two and has since improved even more from year two to year three. At age 23, he seems to be on the right track towards projected stardom.
The most glaring improvement for Bruce is his offense.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/jay-bruces-oddity/

Caveat: much of his improvement is BABIP fueled… though that does NOT mean we should chalk it up to luck.

by alskor on Jul 18, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Delmon Young

just don’t think he belongs. He’s a year and a half older than say, Ike Davis, with the same WAR. I understand the issue with 1Bs needing to rake, but so does a corner outfielder, especially one who isn’t great with the glove.

Ike has been better than Smoak although I still think Smoak will be better in the long run. But i think I’d have to put Moose in the top 20 for Delmon Young, despite his decent bounce back year.

by wobatus on Jul 19, 2010 2:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minor League Ball: Where the Future of Baseball is Discussed

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Catch-22: Is Travis D’Arnaud the ‘Next One?’
Bullpen_banter_logo_small
Bullpen Banter's Top 100 Prospects: 100-51
Hal2_small
AA and MLB hitting production by AA batters between 1995-2002

Recent FanPosts

Small
Community Pitching Prospect #62
Small
Community Positional Prospect #65
Small
Overall Community Prospect #93
Small
New Cubs Draft Strategy/Player Development
Small
Stride Length, release point, and Drag
Small
Community Pitching Prospect #61 RUNOFF
Small
Community Positional Prospect #64
Small
5 yrold Dynasty Fantasy League team openings
Ryan_pic_small
Super Sickels Keeper League has one more opening
Small
Overall Community Prospect #92

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

March2111_084_small John Sickels

Jeri_avatar_small mssickels

Authors

Headshot_small dougdirt

Mblpglogo_small Matt Garrioch

Small SethSpeaks

Osnation2_small Jordan Tuwiner

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Small Marc Hulet

Moderators

Small mrkupe


Site Meter