Kansas City Royals Draft Review
More AL Central analysis, featuring the Kansas City Royals
Kansas City Royals Draft Review
1) Christian Colon, SS, Cal State Fullerton: I don't know why some Royals fans are down on this pick; Colon should be a very good player, with defense, some power, some speed, and on-base ability. Picking fourth, they weren't going to get the one of the Big Three, and there wasn't much difference in the rest of this draft class between Colon and other first rounders. I think this is a good pick that balances talent, affordability, and team needs just fine. He's a future major league regular shortstop, and there aren't many of those in this class.
2) Brett Eibner, RHP-OF, University of Arkansas: I love Brett Eibner, and this pick could be a real steal, given that he has first round talent as both a hitter and pitcher. I'd let him hit first if that's what he wants, and if it doesn't work then you can move him to the mound with less mileage on his arm.
3) Mike Antonio, SS, New York HS: Hailing from New York City, Antonio is talented, but rather raw. He's probably a third baseman in the long run, and may or may not hit enough for the position. This strikes me as an overdraft by a round or three, but they have time to develop him and aren't in immediate need of third base help.
4) Kevin Chapman, LHP, University of Florida: Lefty closer, works at 91-94, has a wicked slider, with enough stuff to keep closing and not be confined to a LOOGY role. Could help in the bullpen pretty quickly.
5) Jason Adam, RHP, Kansas HS: Local talent, which the Royals have been collecting: they don't want any more Albert Pujols debacles. Projectable, throws in the low-90s, has a good curve, should be signable away from college ball at Missouri with second round money.
6) Scott Alexander, LHP, Sonoma State University: Live lefty arm at 90-93 MPH, but inconsistent in college due to mechanical issues. Has more developmental potential than most college pitchers, but also more risk.
7) Eric Cantrell, RHP, George Washington University: Excellent performance record with mediocre stuff, gets by with sharp command.
8) Michael Mariot, RHP, University of Nebraska: Another regional talent, smallish at 6-0 but hits 93, started in college but may fit best in bullpen.
9) Whit Merrifield, OF, University of South Carolina: Features touches of power and speed, not overwhelming in any one area but has few real weaknesses, either. Could be a nice utility guy.
10) Tim Ferguson, OF, University of Mississippi: Stole 24 bases, makes contact, good glove, lacks power. Future fourth or fifth outfielder.
FOUR OTHERS OF NOTE: 13-Jon Gray,RHP, Oklahoma HS; 15-Jason Mitchell, RHP, UT-Arlington; 18-Brian Fletcher, OF, Auburn; 28-Murray Watts,1B, Arkansas State.
COMMENT: I like the first, second, fourth, and fifth round picks a lot, and Eibner has been a particular favorite of mine for awhile. Other picks include a mixture of raw upside with polished college performers. Some Royals fans seem puzzled by the draft, but it looks reasonably diverse to me if you consider what each player actually brings to the table.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
John, do you have any thoughts on how heavy the Royals draft was with colege players
37 out of 50 picks this year, which we have been debating over at Royals Review for the last few days.
Do you think this is most likely reflective of a shift in draft philosophy or a one-time occurrence due to peculiarities with the 2010 draft pool?
Waiting for April.
draft
They started to lean more to college last year in the middle rounds, too. My guess is that there is a shift in philosophy to some extent, although the natures of the talent pools in each particular year may overstate it.
Both this year and last year they picked a mixture of upside and polish, as opposed to 2007 and 2008 when it was mostly just upside.
I think a good organization needs a diversity of talent….diversity of origins, mixture of upside and polish. Even in this class, which was mostly college, they picked both raw guys and polish guys.
by John Sickels on Jun 11, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I feel like the Royals could get the last laugh on Colon
No, he doesn’t have a ton of upside, but he could be an above-average major leaguer who progresses quickly while half the other players they could have chosen flame out in the minors.
Bad Left Hook - The SB Nation boxing blog
"Baseball is played on the field, not on a calculator."
I love Colon
IMO he was definitely a top 10 prospect-probably a top 5
Proud father of Mike Krukow (who is more than 3 times my age)
Grab Some Pine, Meat
Still cheering for Kevin Frandsen
John Bowker: One of the 3 best OF's on the Giants roster
I think a lot of the disappointment in Colon is that so many mock drafts and internet scouts had him going in the middle-, to late-1st round, and they had a lot of disparaging things to say about his D. The near-universal consensus was the he would have to move to 2B.
I’m with you John. I think Colon is great pick. He will almost surely be the first player chosen in this draft to make it to the majors (assuming that he signs). I’ve seen him play on TV a lot over the last 2 years and I don’t think he’ll have any trouble sticking at SS in the majors. H doesn’t have the best tools, but he gets the most out of all his tools by using his baseball knowledge and instincts to be in the right place at the right time. When you watch him play, you’ll notice that the game seems to slow down when he’s involved. In other words, he always seems in control and in position to make the catch, the throw, the hit, the steal, etc., to get the job done. You can see what a calming influence he has on his teammates, expecially in the field.
"There ain’t much to being a ballplayer, if you’re a ballplayer." - Honus Wagner

by 

















